Honestly i dont mind it being broken. What people don't understand is Taker WANTED the streak to end. He was literally begging for someone to beat him, but everyone just said "no" out of respect. Therefore, im fine with it because even Undertaker wanted it to end.
It was a good thing that lesnar got to be the one that eventually ended the streak as he's probably one of the best as athletes of the generation & it only added to his dominant persona that he carried for many more years
@@saqib7965 wow bro, you said something real thought provoking and valuable there. Its scripted so who the fuck gives a shit what happens in it right? I mean the Avengers is scripted so who cares if Ironman dies in it right? So what if the last season of Game of Thrones was shit. It's scripted so why do people have a problem with it? You have opened my mind and made me see reality. I'm going to now no longer care what happens in any movie or show, invest in characters or storylines or what happens in them because hey, it's scripted so it doesn't deserve anyone's attention. Profound man. Pat yourself on the back there buddy, you've really made a whole lot of difference today.
If Roman had ended the Streak and THEN go into the Tribal Chief gimmick he'd be up there with the most hated heels in history. The biggest problem WWE had with Roman was their insistence on running with him as a babyface. He should have been a heel since the beginning
Tribal chief gimmick has gotten stale now.. It's the same thing every PPV.. One of the Usos or sikoa helping him retain.. Then roman taking few weeks off and then coming back near to a PPV
@@CactusJack252this is correct. They could have turned Kane into the absolute unstoppable monster he truly was. I still think it should have never been broken. But if they were going to do it, Kane wins that first Wrestle Mania match, beats him at backlash again. And then Kane moves on defeating everyone else, goes onto win the King of the Ring, gets his title shot at Summer Slam and wins it. Undertaker challenges him for Survivor Series for the championship, Kane agrees, but Paul Bearer adds the stipulation that Taker never gets another title shot again. Kane wins again. And continues taking on all comers outside of The Undertaker and wins all of them. The Royal Rumble comes, Undertaker draws the first spot, goes the distance and wins the Rumble and then finally vanquishes Kane at Wrestle Mania, the rest of the roster comes out and gives Undertaker a standing ovation as Kane's year and a half plus of terror finally comes to an end. I understand all the reasons it never happened, from Austin, to Glenn Jacobs not wanting to end the streak and he knew he was already a made man just from the feud so far. And besides we never would have gotten the streak becoming what it did had Kane won. But the streak definitely shouldn't have ended and neither Brock, or Roman needed it. If anyone was going to do it towards the end of his career it should have been Bray Wyatt frankly.
I understand Undertaker's point of view, but somehow I don't like the idea of Roman beats him. Moreover, should Roman use the nuclear heat he received right after Wrestlemania to turn heel?
it was also around the time where everyone hated roman, and he wasn't even that interesting. then he had this whole this is my yard now, believe that gimmick going. tribal chief is way better lmao. still dont like him though
@@lollipoprei830 yeah I agree with you about The Tribal Chief, no offense to the real person, this gimmick is good, but I somehow feel a bit forced and unreal
The "big dawg" should've been a heel, get hated on & be a confident, pushy character. Then, Roman should be missing for a month or so & and reappear, but everyone questioning what happened or who he was-----Cut a dope promo revealing bits of who he was then a fued with another top star that he was the "Tribal Cheif"
@@lollipoprei830The legit problem with u wwe fans is than u don't approve wrestlers on the basis of their in ring performance. What y'all do instead is like the one that are boring suckers when it comes to wrestling, but are pretty good at cracking vulgar jokes like :- stone cold, John Cena, edge, Shawn Michaels. Roman Reigns so far possessed a great of everything u need someone to call a wrestler: good physique, skill set, speed, agility, coordination, explosiveness. And it's actually hard to find a guy of his size(*120kg frame) who's as athletic as him. And he's actually been using his physical abilities the best way he can. He's wrestling matches were the most interesting when he was playing the big dog gimmick. But sadly most wwe fans don't understand what wrestling is all about or even what wrestling is . If promos and jokes are what u fans care about then u better switch to stand up comedy. How could fans be so stupid that they don't recognise a true talent. Wwe ruined Reigns on the demand of the stupid fans.
@@thuandattran6315he is the champ whether any one likes it or not, people just like hating on him because he is the rocks cousin, people are always going to over shadow his legacy because the rock.. not saying you but in general
I was at that rasslinmania. You can see me my brother and 2 cousins bout 20 rows behind Taker's hat on the side of the ramp. I remember slapping hands with Goldberg. Goldberg had leather feeling hands.
I like the Undertaker, but I really didn’t like the match between him and Roman at WM33. Specially with how Roman was getting the negative attitude towards him. Had it been the heel Roman we know now, it probably would’ve been a much interesting match.
First of all, the streak should've never ended, but we all know how Vince McMahon likes to screw things up. If they really wanted to end the streak, then it should've been done by Taker's longtime rivals like HBK, HHH, or Kane, not by Lesnar and Reigns.
That's not how the business works. Shawn, HHH, and Kane were at the end of their careers. They were already made men and wouldn't benefit from ending the streak + would retire in a few years. It was always going to be ended by someone who had many years left in the company. That said, Brock did not need it either, IMO, because he was a made man too.
Except Taker wanted the streak to end ages ago. First to Randy Orton, Kurt Angle, Mark Henry, and Edge to name a few. He just wanted it to end in a way it would benefit the company and the star (preferably an up-and-coming). So that said, he wasn't totally sold on the idea of losing to brock because Brock was already an attraction
Been watching for a long time, back to like 1996 and Roman’s celebration after the match is one of my all time favorite moments. I didn’t like Roman at all and was failing to see “it” in him and that match opened the door for me. It still took 3 years for me to acknowledge him but it started there. With Brock it was a shocker, when Roman faced him there was no question.
If streak was going to end; it should have been done either by someone Taker wrestled in WMs many times (like HHH, HBK or Kane) or by a fresh talent who would be the main guy. Brock Lesnar ended the streak and appeared just few times in 2014. If Taker vs. Reigns happened when Taker was undefeated and Reigns had the current gimmick, that would be way more interesting than their match in WM33.
Bitch and moan all y'all wanna.... But Streaks end and LEGENDS LIVE FOREVER. HAIL THE.... UNDERTAKER!!! #CVVClips #StreaksDoEnd #LegendIsForever!!! #HailTheDeadMan!!!
The issue with Roman beating Taker at Mania was that Taker was one of the most loved guy in wrestling at the time (and ever), and Reigns was seriously struggling with being portrayed as a good guy. I wasn't into wrestling at the time so when I looked at the results after the show, I just assumed that Reigns was supposed to be a heel.
Brock vs undertaker match is remembered till that even with people who don't watch wrestling anymore, and i remember any undertaker match more than against roman becoz it was a bad match
He squashed John Cena only to lose against Roman. The worst match of all time. Roman's promo on raw night after wm was the most disliked wwe videos on yt. 😂😂😂
if the streak was gonna get broken he should’ve retired after the brock match having a few forgettable matches at mania and then losing AGAIN ruined it for me
In my opinion John Cena defeating the streak would've justify the ending of Streak as Undertaker vs John was a dream match then and John could later be defeated by Roman Reigns, saving both the streak and Romans career.
Just goes to show how much taker is the business man yes he's a wrestling fan but he knows when guys hlneed a push and he knows when to be selfless bigger picture and all.
Adam Blampied proposed a 'how wwe should've booked' video with Cena beating the streak. In a nutshell, Cena put up leaving the WWE for a year if he lost, and then cheated to break the streak, turning heel in the process.
Roman reign era markest the worst era of wwe. Where we have to see part time main eventers and championship being held hostage. Undertaker did diserves to the fans by losing to him
Sad part of the streak ending is that it was to Lesnar and now with the recent allegations his reputation is ruined whether they are true or not. If Lesnar gets the Benoit treatment and is wiped from everything WWE will that mean never showing or discussing the end of the streak?
The night after WrestleMania 33 there was nuclear heat on Roman Reigns almost felt wwe is going to turn him heel Haven't heard that much boos for a wrestler since Shawn Michaels in Canada In hindsight Taker probably regrets now dropping his streak to Lesnar who is being cancelled now , he should have put over younger talent or retire undefeated it was the worst booking decision wwe made in last 20 years
He didn't want to drop it to Lesnar that was all Vince's doing he had a job he did it but the fact that Lesnar is being cancelled (which just shows how weak society is by prejudging the outcome like that) has nothing to do with it. He didn't like it because Brock didn't need it he wanted to give it to someone who could really do something with it like Roman
I feel like the streak should have ended just for the pure shock factor of when it happened. The whole point of wrestling is to create moments that you’ll never forget and that is arguably No1. However, I do believe they wasted it on Brock Lesnar when he didn’t need it. Roman would have been perfect for it, especially if they were turning him heel “This is my yard now” is still one of the best promos ever delivered.
Had Roman been the Tribal Chief/Head of The Table (HEEL) then he would be perfect to beating the Undertakers streak unlike then which felt that it wasn't right. I'm just surprised Brock did it first, which felt like that had to be the end Undertaker career, a proper final match.
Streaks are usually broken anyway. If anyone was to break the streak in the most believable way it would be Brock! On the other hand, if anyone needed the win over the undertaker I agree with the decision of Roman winning since he’s the future of the business. Personally, if I had Undertaker defeated Brock and Roman at those respective mani matches-if I had my way I would have Bray Wyatt beat the streak
I'd buy that if weren't for the fact that Roman was also a Grand Slam Champion, a former Royal Rumble winner, five time consecutive Royal Rumble finalist, had broken Kane's Royal Rumble elimination record, had clean finishes over Triple H, John Cena, Seth Rollins, Brock Lesnar, AJ Styles, and Chris Jericho, and was otherwise built as an unstoppable superman with every accolade the business had to offer for nye on a decade. Currently, he holds a record of having the _second_ most Wrestlemania main events, only one behind Hulk Hogan. The fact that all that and more _still_ wasn't enough to sell him as the new face of the company should have spoken volumes. Fact is, WWE actively sacrificed the best years of dozens of promising storylines and careers (including Kevin Owens, Seth Rollins, Dean Ambrose, Finn Balor, and Drew McIntyre), as well as undermined the achievements of previous legends (including Kane's RR record, Brock's breaking of the Streak, and the status of every Grand Slam champion) by feeding them all to a man the fans had actively and near unanimously rejected for nearly ten years. No one, and I mean _no one,_ has benefitted from Roman's run. Everyone he has worked with has seen their careers slow to a crawl or die completely. Because everyone and everything was actively knee-capped in an effort to sell Roman as the "next big thing." Roman rarely being in the ring has been a godsend to the product, and has giving some much needed breathing space to the rest of the business. After 12 years of work it's (begrudgingly) fitting to label Roman as a veteran in the company, and it's historically a veterans duty to help build new superstars and cement the future of the business, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. I can't say that Roman's run has permanently damaged the business without sounding hyperbolic, but I know that me and many others have completely tuned out of it for that exact reason. I don't think WWE's desperation to build a star has ever crippled its product so widely in its history. Not with Hogan, not with Cena, not even with Triple H. Credit to Taker for keeping loyal to the product and its booking, but I calls it as I sees it. Roman was a mistake.
Taker wanted roman to end the streak. At that time roman would have gotten shitted on badly by the fans if that had happened. Look how they treated lesnar who is a legitimate bad ass and top already established brock lesnar. Wrestling fans are no joke buddy.
It’s kinda funny. People were mad when he was scheduled to come back to face Aj cause if that emotional ending against Roman. But in some respects that match against Roman was his retirement match after all cause he didn’t have another match in front of a crowd. The match with aj wasn’t a traditional match.
Brock Lesnar should have been his last match. For it to push him that much, and the fact that undertaker's legacy has already been solidified tenfold, it's okay for him to suffer as one of the greatest, if not the greatest, wrestler of all time to let someone else get a major push 💯💯💯🫡🫡🫡
1. Streak should never have ended. 2. If it HAD to end, it should have been at WM25 with HBK (followed up by Taker beating and retiring HBK at WM26). 3. If he already lost to Brock at WM30, that should have been the end of it. 4. This was a terrible idea. Roman Reigns is not on the same level as those other guys.
The streak should either, never had ended. Or only have ended by Roman Reigns. But not at Wrestlemania 33. He was beat up and should never have even been in the ring that night I think the 2014 rumble was the perfect rumble for Reigns to win, instead of batista and then reigns challenging Orton that year. But then the following year, they should have had Taker vs Reigns. A year after Taker had beaten Lesnar
Taker losing to Roman made a hell of a lot more sense than Taker losing to Brock did. That being said in my opinion if he was going to lose to anyone it should have been either Punk or Bray Wyatt, otherwise he should have retired undefeated at Mania.
The Streak never should've ended, I'm gonna say that. Now he seems not as luxurious as he should've been... but he should have lost it to Roman, because that win Roman got, doesn't really mean shit.
The streak was bigger than Taker at a certain point after Taker was just around for about 1 match a year, so even if he wanted it to end, it shouldn't have at that point nor should have been his decision. If nothing else the Streak could have been teased forever as a match at Wrestlemania including the buildup to it for many more years. To add insult, a glorified midcarder then took a victory off Taker at a Wrestlemania. Now the magic is completely gone.
I wouldn't say that it's just that Brock shouldn't of been the one to do it Kane and Orton had a case back in the day Roman also has a case going into a proper heel run as the big dawg or just someone he didn't face that could do with that pop
A lot of people hated that Roman Reigns beat Undertaker that year but this is my thing and take on it I wasn't mad That Roman reigns won I was Sad because I thought at the time Key word at the time that it was undertaker last match
To those saying taker should have been defeated..let me just tell you that loss didnt lost any respect aur greatness of undertaker but just respect and greatness for roman a little ofc taker is the best
Roman reigns was the guy to end the streak but Brock never need it that type of status he was already a world champ plus ufc champ Roman was the future but realistically taker should’ve just stop after 20-0
That match wasn’t John v taker it was taker v James else worth in disguise cah y is one of the 2 biggest names in WWE history matches lastin for 3 minutes
I wouldn't say as the Tribal Chief but I would like a proper heel run as the Big Dawg that could work so my vision is essentially Mark Henry's Hall of Pain but done right with it lasting much longer and more devastating. No bloodline just the Big Dawg unleashed.
The streak should never have ended. Taker should have retired after beating Triple H for the third time at Mania.
Honestly i dont mind it being broken. What people don't understand is Taker WANTED the streak to end. He was literally begging for someone to beat him, but everyone just said "no" out of respect. Therefore, im fine with it because even Undertaker wanted it to end.
I think it’s good for it being broken, when Brock was at his most dominant around wrestlemania 30
It was a good thing that lesnar got to be the one that eventually ended the streak as he's probably one of the best as athletes of the generation & it only added to his dominant persona that he carried for many more years
It's all scripted who cares
@@saqib7965 wow bro, you said something real thought provoking and valuable there. Its scripted so who the fuck gives a shit what happens in it right? I mean the Avengers is scripted so who cares if Ironman dies in it right?
So what if the last season of Game of Thrones was shit. It's scripted so why do people have a problem with it? You have opened my mind and made me see reality. I'm going to now no longer care what happens in any movie or show, invest in characters or storylines or what happens in them because hey, it's scripted so it doesn't deserve anyone's attention. Profound man. Pat yourself on the back there buddy, you've really made a whole lot of difference today.
If Roman had ended the Streak and THEN go into the Tribal Chief gimmick he'd be up there with the most hated heels in history. The biggest problem WWE had with Roman was their insistence on running with him as a babyface. He should have been a heel since the beginning
Agreed
Tribal chief gimmick has gotten stale now.. It's the same thing every PPV.. One of the Usos or sikoa helping him retain.. Then roman taking few weeks off and then coming back near to a PPV
@@shreyassm4096nothing wrong with his gimmick. What has gotten stale is his championship run.
@@vaisakhgeeth I mean he should at least win some matches without interference! And also he is a part timer.. Shouldn't be a champion anymore
@@shreyassm4096 He is a heel. They want us to hate him. It isn't like he is incapable. He was dominant and winning matches alone in the beginning.
The running into the ropes is somehow charging his spear up 😂
When you do something like running ropes you go faster so that is the idea that Roman hit him as hard as he ever hit anybody with a spear put him away
It increases your momentum
And taker just stood there waiting
@@theindestructibleone483 he took like 10 spears
It does dummy. The ropes spring you forward faster than when you hit them
The streak should've never ended
Shut up!!
True
The only person to end the streak should have been Kane. No one else should have been given a thought.
@@CactusJack252this is correct. They could have turned Kane into the absolute unstoppable monster he truly was.
I still think it should have never been broken.
But if they were going to do it, Kane wins that first Wrestle Mania match, beats him at backlash again. And then Kane moves on defeating everyone else, goes onto win the King of the Ring, gets his title shot at Summer Slam and wins it. Undertaker challenges him for Survivor Series for the championship, Kane agrees, but Paul Bearer adds the stipulation that Taker never gets another title shot again. Kane wins again. And continues taking on all comers outside of The Undertaker and wins all of them.
The Royal Rumble comes, Undertaker draws the first spot, goes the distance and wins the Rumble and then finally vanquishes Kane at Wrestle Mania, the rest of the roster comes out and gives Undertaker a standing ovation as Kane's year and a half plus of terror finally comes to an end.
I understand all the reasons it never happened, from Austin, to Glenn Jacobs not wanting to end the streak and he knew he was already a made man just from the feud so far.
And besides we never would have gotten the streak becoming what it did had Kane won. But the streak definitely shouldn't have ended and neither Brock, or Roman needed it. If anyone was going to do it towards the end of his career it should have been Bray Wyatt frankly.
it shouldn’t have ended to brock
Taker should've retired after 20-0.
Or retired at 21-1
Hell no, we don't get that awesome match against Punk. You've lost ya mind
I understand Undertaker's point of view, but somehow I don't like the idea of Roman beats him. Moreover, should Roman use the nuclear heat he received right after Wrestlemania to turn heel?
it was also around the time where everyone hated roman, and he wasn't even that interesting. then he had this whole this is my yard now, believe that gimmick going.
tribal chief is way better lmao. still dont like him though
@@lollipoprei830 yeah I agree with you about The Tribal Chief, no offense to the real person, this gimmick is good, but I somehow feel a bit forced and unreal
The "big dawg" should've been a heel, get hated on & be a confident, pushy character.
Then, Roman should be missing for a month or so & and reappear, but everyone questioning what happened or who he was-----Cut a dope promo revealing bits of who he was then a fued with another top star that he was the "Tribal Cheif"
@@lollipoprei830The legit problem with u wwe fans is than u don't approve wrestlers on the basis of their in ring performance. What y'all do instead is like the one that are boring suckers when it comes to wrestling, but are pretty good at cracking vulgar jokes like :- stone cold, John Cena, edge, Shawn Michaels.
Roman Reigns so far possessed a great of everything u need someone to call a wrestler: good physique, skill set, speed, agility, coordination, explosiveness. And it's actually hard to find a guy of his size(*120kg frame) who's as athletic as him. And he's actually been using his physical abilities the best way he can. He's wrestling matches were the most interesting when he was playing the big dog gimmick. But sadly most wwe fans don't understand what wrestling is all about or even what wrestling is . If promos and jokes are what u fans care about then u better switch to stand up comedy. How could fans be so stupid that they don't recognise a true talent. Wwe ruined Reigns on the demand of the stupid fans.
@@thuandattran6315he is the champ whether any one likes it or not, people just like hating on him because he is the rocks cousin, people are always going to over shadow his legacy because the rock.. not saying you but in general
Selfless Person, giving back to the business & his passion as much as he can.... Good ❤
Taker is the final Boss
Yes bro 😊😊
I was at that rasslinmania. You can see me my brother and 2 cousins bout 20 rows behind Taker's hat on the side of the ramp. I remember slapping hands with Goldberg. Goldberg had leather feeling hands.
*WrestleMania not rasslinmania lil buddy
@j.c.2514 well bahgawd you. You ain't no real rasslin fan than. You must not be from the real rasslins times likes I am.
Enlighten me what is rasslinmania?
@@evachee7594no im more intrested in these "real" rassilin times
Would've worked as current roman
In my opinion Roman should've been the one to end the streak. The heat he would get after ending the streak would be unimaginable
In hindsight now that we know what a stinker of a match that was, it should’ve.
That would've been the worst thing, people would've started boycotting lol
Undertaker agrees with u he wanted it to be roman
I heard in an interview that for taker, brock didn't need that win because he's already brock
Roman Reigns is absolute garbage
I like the Undertaker, but I really didn’t like the match between him and Roman at WM33. Specially with how Roman was getting the negative attitude towards him. Had it been the heel Roman we know now, it probably would’ve been a much interesting match.
I didn't like how Roman's catchphrase used to be takers during 'the American badass'
Ending steak will always be the dumbest and stupid move in wwe history .. taker could have retired with streak on
Last Line : Saying Goodbye 😔😔 G O A T SIR UNDERTAKER ❤❤❤
Crazy to think Undertaker is retired, how time flies
The Invasion Angle, DDP being a stalker & ending Undertakers streak are the 3 dumbest decisions Vince ever made.
Well, there's also Undertaker vs Goldberg in 2019
@@cokeysmurf2436 never saw thar one
@@FathersUnited-fu You're lucky lol. It's probably both men's worst match. If you watch it, you'll feel embarrassed
Undertaker made the decision to end the streak not vince
@@THEMEISTER004 False
Cena basically did this for Taker. After he lost to Reigns last year, many people were pissed and thought Taker was washed up.
I remember this. The raw after mania Roman recieved massive cheers . Just like WWE had planned lmao
Lmao 😂
This is my fart now.
First of all, the streak should've never ended, but we all know how Vince McMahon likes to screw things up. If they really wanted to end the streak, then it should've been done by Taker's longtime rivals like HBK, HHH, or Kane, not by Lesnar and Reigns.
Facts!
Lesnar went into business for himself
That's not how the business works. Shawn, HHH, and Kane were at the end of their careers. They were already made men and wouldn't benefit from ending the streak + would retire in a few years. It was always going to be ended by someone who had many years left in the company.
That said, Brock did not need it either, IMO, because he was a made man too.
Except Taker wanted the streak to end ages ago. First to Randy Orton, Kurt Angle, Mark Henry, and Edge to name a few. He just wanted it to end in a way it would benefit the company and the star (preferably an up-and-coming). So that said, he wasn't totally sold on the idea of losing to brock because Brock was already an attraction
@@vta2265 ending the streak didn't benefit the company
Been watching for a long time, back to like 1996 and Roman’s celebration after the match is one of my all time favorite moments. I didn’t like Roman at all and was failing to see “it” in him and that match opened the door for me. It still took 3 years for me to acknowledge him but it started there. With Brock it was a shocker, when Roman faced him there was no question.
Because it’s Roman Reigns. They had him beat everyone. Why would Undertaker after the streak was already broken be an exception
Because Undertaker is the most dominant wrestler of all time man is the 🐐
@@bigdic1kinda obvious he would be the guy when he's in the world title picture immediately after losing it
If streak was going to end; it should have been done either by someone Taker wrestled in WMs many times (like HHH, HBK or Kane) or by a fresh talent who would be the main guy. Brock Lesnar ended the streak and appeared just few times in 2014. If Taker vs. Reigns happened when Taker was undefeated and Reigns had the current gimmick, that would be way more interesting than their match in WM33.
😂😂😂 the fact that Roman did a run across the ring spear to win as if it was the video game No mercy on Nintendo 64 kills me
I know you were tired we love you always Roman needed his bubble broken 💔 nice seeing you again miss you now you can spend the time with your wife!!!!
Bitch and moan all y'all wanna.... But Streaks end and LEGENDS LIVE FOREVER. HAIL THE.... UNDERTAKER!!!
#CVVClips #StreaksDoEnd #LegendIsForever!!! #HailTheDeadMan!!!
Hail the one and ONLY big dog, Undertaker.
I like how loyal are all superstars to wwe
The issue with Roman beating Taker at Mania was that Taker was one of the most loved guy in wrestling at the time (and ever), and Reigns was seriously struggling with being portrayed as a good guy. I wasn't into wrestling at the time so when I looked at the results after the show, I just assumed that Reigns was supposed to be a heel.
Leaving on a loss at the most important stage of the business is crazy Taker.
This was a question I had as well
Brock vs undertaker match is remembered till that even with people who don't watch wrestling anymore, and i remember any undertaker match more than against roman becoz it was a bad match
He squashed John Cena only to lose against Roman. The worst match of all time. Roman's promo on raw night after wm was the most disliked wwe videos on yt. 😂😂😂
He lost to Roman first then squashed John Cena.
But Roman may the face of wwe but legendary undertaker must face of wwe and WWF after his retirement 😢😢
It killed any person likening roman, i remember hating Roman at the time, after this match, i was like fuck wwe i'm not watching anymore
Taker ended up coming back the next year and "wrestling" Cena.
if the streak was gonna get broken he should’ve retired after the brock match
having a few forgettable matches at mania and then losing AGAIN ruined it for me
In my opinion John Cena defeating the streak would've justify the ending of Streak as Undertaker vs John was a dream match then and John could later be defeated by Roman Reigns, saving both the streak and Romans career.
Roman's "charging" the spear with the ropes is so badass
Just goes to show how much taker is the business man yes he's a wrestling fan but he knows when guys hlneed a push and he knows when to be selfless bigger picture and all.
BTW, this is just my opinion
Brock and roman went on to be the main guys for the next near decade. So it worked as a way of giving back and keeping things going.
When people are asked who is on your top 5 wrestlers of all time, The Undertaker never gets mentioned. To me, Taker is number 1. Hands down.
Adam Blampied proposed a 'how wwe should've booked' video with Cena beating the streak. In a nutshell, Cena put up leaving the WWE for a year if he lost, and then cheated to break the streak, turning heel in the process.
I think streak should have never ended. And that too for some recent guy!! There was a reason his streak was meant to be there!!!
Edge : Reigns is that guy (who should end Taker's streak)
I still feel that Roman should’ve been the one who broken the streak thus given us this version of the tribal chief and I stand on that 1003 %
Undertaker was much more than the streak
Roman reign era markest the worst era of wwe. Where we have to see part time main eventers and championship being held hostage.
Undertaker did diserves to the fans by losing to him
I still see it different as a fan of Taker for life. It should never happened
Thank god for him continuing so we got the boneyard match
If anyone was to beat the streak, it should've been The Legend Killer Randy Orton.
Sad part of the streak ending is that it was to Lesnar and now with the recent allegations his reputation is ruined whether they are true or not. If Lesnar gets the Benoit treatment and is wiped from everything WWE will that mean never showing or discussing the end of the streak?
He the best
The night after WrestleMania 33 there was nuclear heat on Roman Reigns almost felt wwe is going to turn him heel
Haven't heard that much boos for a wrestler since Shawn Michaels in Canada
In hindsight Taker probably regrets now dropping his streak to Lesnar who is being cancelled now , he should have put over younger talent or retire undefeated it was the worst booking decision wwe made in last 20 years
He didn't want to drop it to Lesnar that was all Vince's doing he had a job he did it but the fact that Lesnar is being cancelled (which just shows how weak society is by prejudging the outcome like that) has nothing to do with it. He didn't like it because Brock didn't need it he wanted to give it to someone who could really do something with it like Roman
Either the streak should've been lost to Roman first or it should have stayed intact Brock didn't need an up.
My man said legitimate ending and then proceeded to have two more mania's with Cena and Styles
streaks are meant to be broken everybody
I feel like the streak should have ended just for the pure shock factor of when it happened. The whole point of wrestling is to create moments that you’ll never forget and that is arguably No1.
However, I do believe they wasted it on Brock Lesnar when he didn’t need it. Roman would have been perfect for it, especially if they were turning him heel
“This is my yard now” is still one of the best promos ever delivered.
Had Roman been the Tribal Chief/Head of The Table (HEEL) then he would be perfect to beating the Undertakers streak unlike then which felt that it wasn't right. I'm just surprised Brock did it first, which felt like that had to be the end Undertaker career, a proper final match.
It was time to pass the baton 🎉 🙏 🪦 Taker
Saying goodbye, didn't take fight Goldberg afterwards
Nah bro it should have ended with that last match with Triple H Undertaker and Michael’s, Undertaker was synonymous with the streak at Wrestlemania
At 1st I thought he was talking about another wrestler named "Russel Maneia" as well as the undertaker lol
As a fan of take for about years I didn't knew roman defeated him that's how forgettable that is.
I bet now TKO will change it and say Roman ended the streak after the allegations.
Lol Brock is literally erased like Benoit in the WWE recent opening clips. They will go with Roman on this.
That ain't happening.
It would've made much more sense if the streak had not been broken. Yeah Roman really should've been the one to break it.
Why Undertaker never faced The Rock or Stone Cold Steve Austin in WrestleMania in Attitude Era?
Streaks are usually broken anyway. If anyone was to break the streak in the most believable way it would be Brock! On the other hand, if anyone needed the win over the undertaker I agree with the decision of Roman winning since he’s the future of the business. Personally, if I had Undertaker defeated Brock and Roman at those respective mani matches-if I had my way I would have Bray Wyatt beat the streak
I'd buy that if weren't for the fact that Roman was also a Grand Slam Champion, a former Royal Rumble winner, five time consecutive Royal Rumble finalist, had broken Kane's Royal Rumble elimination record, had clean finishes over Triple H, John Cena, Seth Rollins, Brock Lesnar, AJ Styles, and Chris Jericho, and was otherwise built as an unstoppable superman with every accolade the business had to offer for nye on a decade.
Currently, he holds a record of having the _second_ most Wrestlemania main events, only one behind Hulk Hogan.
The fact that all that and more _still_ wasn't enough to sell him as the new face of the company should have spoken volumes. Fact is, WWE actively sacrificed the best years of dozens of promising storylines and careers (including Kevin Owens, Seth Rollins, Dean Ambrose, Finn Balor, and Drew McIntyre), as well as undermined the achievements of previous legends (including Kane's RR record, Brock's breaking of the Streak, and the status of every Grand Slam champion) by feeding them all to a man the fans had actively and near unanimously rejected for nearly ten years.
No one, and I mean _no one,_ has benefitted from Roman's run. Everyone he has worked with has seen their careers slow to a crawl or die completely. Because everyone and everything was actively knee-capped in an effort to sell Roman as the "next big thing."
Roman rarely being in the ring has been a godsend to the product, and has giving some much needed breathing space to the rest of the business. After 12 years of work it's (begrudgingly) fitting to label Roman as a veteran in the company, and it's historically a veterans duty to help build new superstars and cement the future of the business, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. I can't say that Roman's run has permanently damaged the business without sounding hyperbolic, but I know that me and many others have completely tuned out of it for that exact reason.
I don't think WWE's desperation to build a star has ever crippled its product so widely in its history. Not with Hogan, not with Cena, not even with Triple H. Credit to Taker for keeping loyal to the product and its booking, but I calls it as I sees it. Roman was a mistake.
Taker wanted roman to end the streak. At that time roman would have gotten shitted on badly by the fans if that had happened. Look how they treated lesnar who is a legitimate bad ass and top already established brock lesnar. Wrestling fans are no joke buddy.
The reason Undertaker cuz script writer tell him to lose simple 😂
Sir don't say goodbye
It’s kinda funny. People were mad when he was scheduled to come back to face Aj cause if that emotional ending against Roman.
But in some respects that match against Roman was his retirement match after all cause he didn’t have another match in front of a crowd. The match with aj wasn’t a traditional match.
Brock Lesnar should have been his last match. For it to push him that much, and the fact that undertaker's legacy has already been solidified tenfold, it's okay for him to suffer as one of the greatest, if not the greatest, wrestler of all time to let someone else get a major push 💯💯💯🫡🫡🫡
Ending streak was worst decision
Watching him since kid, I’d say the streak should never have been broken in the first place.
d_i_c_k move vince.
Taker beat Tripple H 2 Times and i am happy 😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤❤❤❤
3 times
Takers streak should have never ended stupid business decision. And to lose to Brock and Roman was even worse
Either the streak should of never been broken or undertaker should of retired after the steak was broken
Brock Lesnar deserved ended the streak i love you Lesnar ♥️♥️♥️♥️🦁👑👍
Kane shouldve broken it, it makes way more sense, kayfabe wise
Brock is the only wrestler I could accept ending takers streak. Still kinda mad it happened, but if had to, Brock was the right guy.
Breaking this Legendary Streak.
Biggest blunder made by Vince 👎🏽
1. Streak should never have ended.
2. If it HAD to end, it should have been at WM25 with HBK (followed up by Taker beating and retiring HBK at WM26).
3. If he already lost to Brock at WM30, that should have been the end of it.
4. This was a terrible idea. Roman Reigns is not on the same level as those other guys.
Makes sense 😀
The streak should either, never had ended. Or only have ended by Roman Reigns. But not at Wrestlemania 33. He was beat up and should never have even been in the ring that night
I think the 2014 rumble was the perfect rumble for Reigns to win, instead of batista and then reigns challenging Orton that year. But then the following year, they should have had Taker vs Reigns. A year after Taker had beaten Lesnar
❤❤❤❤❤
Taker losing to Roman made a hell of a lot more sense than Taker losing to Brock did. That being said in my opinion if he was going to lose to anyone it should have been either Punk or Bray Wyatt, otherwise he should have retired undefeated at Mania.
The streak should have never been beaten ever
Roman reigns should’ve been the one to end the streak since he was the new upcoming face of the wwe
The streak should’ve ended there. Roman deserved that prize, Brock didn’t need it.
The undertaker wrestlemania
I wasn't mad at that match on raw the biggest hate on roman reigns should have said it right there ACKNOWLEDGE ME
The Streak never should've ended, I'm gonna say that. Now he seems not as luxurious as he should've been... but he should have lost it to Roman, because that win Roman got, doesn't really mean shit.
The streak was bigger than Taker at a certain point after Taker was just around for about 1 match a year, so even if he wanted it to end, it shouldn't have at that point nor should have been his decision.
If nothing else the Streak could have been teased forever as a match at Wrestlemania including the buildup to it for many more years. To add insult, a glorified midcarder then took a victory off Taker at a Wrestlemania. Now the magic is completely gone.
Streak should’ve never been broken man
I wouldn't say that it's just that Brock shouldn't of been the one to do it Kane and Orton had a case back in the day Roman also has a case going into a proper heel run as the big dawg or just someone he didn't face that could do with that pop
A lot of people hated that Roman Reigns beat Undertaker that year but this is my thing and take on it I wasn't mad That Roman reigns won I was Sad because I thought at the time Key word at the time that it was undertaker last match
To those saying taker should have been defeated..let me just tell you that loss didnt lost any respect aur greatness of undertaker but just respect and greatness for roman a little ofc taker is the best
Roman reigns was the guy to end the streak but Brock never need it that type of status he was already a world champ plus ufc champ Roman was the future but realistically taker should’ve just stop after 20-0
That match wasn’t John v taker it was taker v James else worth in disguise cah y is one of the 2 biggest names in WWE history matches lastin for 3 minutes
Roman beating Taker did absolutely nothing in terms of pushing him.
I never liked the idea of streak ending but i think Roman reigns as the tribal chief is the best choice to end the streak
I wouldn't say as the Tribal Chief but I would like a proper heel run as the Big Dawg that could work so my vision is essentially Mark Henry's Hall of Pain but done right with it lasting much longer and more devastating. No bloodline just the Big Dawg unleashed.
Never that why now wwe fans is decreasing
Undertaker lost to put someone over who none of us actually wanted in the first place and still don't. Wasted.
Streak shouldn't have ended, but if it had to then it should been Roman instead of Brock.