Ultimate Graph of the Universe Shows We Live In a Black Hole...But Do We?
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 05. 2024
- Get a Wonderful Person Tee: teespring.com/stores/whatdamath
More cool designs are on Amazon: amzn.to/3QFIrFX
Alternatively, PayPal donations can be sent here: paypal.me/whatdamath
Hello and welcome! My name is Anton and in this video, we will talk about the ultimate logarithmic graph ever made - the one showing us everything in the universe!
Links:
pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compton...
#physics #universe #blackhole
0:00 Physics and log graphs
1:30 New graph and what it tries to do
2:50 How objects condensed into stuff
3:30 How the study was done - focusing on the extremes
4:00 Hubble radius
4:20 Compton limit
5:35 Max size to mass ratio - black holes
6:15 Potential suggestion universe is a black hole
7:40 Overall summary of this graph
8:10 Instanton - the crossover of both ideas
8:35 Universe came from instanton
10:30 Do we live inside a black hole?
12:30 Unanswered question - forbidden areas and double forbidden region
Support this channel on Patreon to help me make this a full time job:
/ whatdamath
Bitcoin/Ethereum to spare? Donate them here to help this channel grow!
bc1qnkl3nk0zt7w0xzrgur9pnkcduj7a3xxllcn7d4
or ETH: 0x60f088B10b03115405d313f964BeA93eF0Bd3DbF
Space Engine is available for free here: spaceengine.org
Enjoy and please subscribe.
Twitter: / whatdamath
Facebook: / whatdamath
Twitch: / whatdamath
The hardware used to record these videos:
New Camera: amzn.to/34DUUlv
CPU: amzn.to/2LZFQCJ
Video Card: amzn.to/2M1W26C
Motherboard: amzn.to/2JYGiQQ
RAM: amzn.to/2Mwy2t4
PSU: amzn.to/2LZcrIH
Case: amzn.to/2MwJZz4
Microphone: amzn.to/2t5jTv0
Mixer: amzn.to/2JOL0oF
Recording and Editing: amzn.to/2LX6uvU
Some of the above are affiliate links, meaning I would get a (very small) percentage of the price paid.
Thank you to all Patreon supporters of this channel
Special thanks also goes to all the wonderful supporters of the channel through CZcams Memberships
Images/Videos:
Pablo Carlos Budassi www.pablocarlosbudassi.com/
Andrew Z. Colvin CC BY-SA 3.0 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_...
hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...
Richard Powell CC BY-SA 2.5 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercl...
Licenses used:
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
creativecommons.org/licenses/... - Věda a technologie
Instanton is the word thats used to explain how fast Anton creates these videos everyday
I thought it was pronounced inst-Anton.
Instantontoninstanton
I think it's certain that "the answers" to all our unanswered questions about what and how the universe *is* will turn out to be far, far weirder than we ever anticipated, or can even imagine.
Agreed.
The answer is 42.
... being fed bs ... indeed. 😆
I think it will be so simple & straightforward it will be a "smacks forehead - aha" moment
Then how will we even know?
What's actually crazy to me is how visualizations are so powerful that simply putting everything on a graph revealed new potential ideas in a field that's already so saturated.
You can calculate how fast the universe is going to grow by measuring how much mass is revealed as the universe expands. if more mass is revealed, that means that the universe will increase in mass and needs to grow bigger to maintain the Schwarzschild radius.
if the graph is correctly made of cource (reference to all Earth maps that aren't accurate at all)
@@greengoblin9567 What does "mass is revealed" means?
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 When time passes, the observable universe increases in size because more light is able to reach us. This means that time is proportional volume of the observable universe. This is similar to a black hole, because the roles of space and time are reversed past the event horizon. This is the same if the observable universe is a black hole.
@@greengoblin9567 "When time passes, the observable universe increases in size because more light is able to reach us."
That's right.
"This means that time is proportional volume of the observable universe."
That's wrong. Please read up on what the word "proportional" actually means.
"This is similar to a black hole, because the roles of space and time are reversed past the event horizon. "
Yes, the roles of space and time are reversed. So what?! In what way does this make it similar to the expansion of the universe???
"This is the same if the observable universe is a black hole."
Not at all!!! Actually, it's totally different, not "the same"!
Science aside, I love that one of the authors of the study is named Lineweaver. It's perfect, like something out of a DnD campaign or a novel
He totally weaved the lines on the graph
If I had a name like that, I would make sure my career was related to lines in some way lol
He's an amazing person to talk to. I'm sure he'd be a pain to run a D&D game for cause he'd bust all the DM's plans. :)
Like Chase CEO JP “Diamond”
(Money 🦀)
Or Donald “Trump”
(Wins, even in Politics)
Elon “Musk”
(the smell after not showering in exchange for innovation) ok this one is a joke but there is definitely a study out there that attributes success to given/family names
@@mvflp2218 Totally lol. My married name is a kind of water spinach 🤣 I wonder where that will get me in life? I do love vegetables...
If we are inside a black hole, does the coming heat death of the universe mean that our binding energy will someday escape as Hawking radiation?
Wow that question really got me thinking....
Perhaps. Who the heck knows.
Depends on the laws of the physic of the universe in which the black hole is.
The binding energy will be converted into rain, probably chocolate flavored.
Quick! Calculate the expected energy loss through hawking radiation of a black hole the size and mass of the universe with the observed and expected loss of energy of our universe
Noble prize is yours my friend
Hope we will learn more about the “instant Anton” in future videos!
nice one! thanks for the laugh
Instant Anton. Just pour water and grow your very own wonderful person.
From the nothingness of a thought, matter can be created. A thought weighs nothing and has no substance yet can exert force on bodies. Animals are telepathic and people have the most advanced thoughts and record history, and animals have ESP as well. The instanton is a thought, the infinitesimal smallest thing possible, aptly named for Anton Petrov (maybe). His explanation was excellent and I would have had a hard time understanding this chart without his help.
If in a black hole it really matters where we are relative to the incoming accretion disk, where matter there take billions of years to circulate into the center regions. If our location is not far from the greatest forces spaghettification happens. If a supermassive black hole becomes so strong it consumes all of the matter in a galaxy becoming intensely bright but then becoming a quiescent gluon mass with powerful gravity appearing dark. It might be that dark matter is these gluon masses that are huge, and may be a large part of the humongous voids that are the main feature of the Universe, but this is speculation.
@somescientist3821,
Braintrap! Watch out, Black Holes are tricky. If we are inside a BlackHole, the accretiondisk is non existent for us. That is outside. Disprooves another assumption from the video, about the density outside. 🚀🏴☠️
@@busybillyb33
😂👍🏻
I love how this person put together this graph. It's something I've day dreamed about a ton. The very small & the very large & where our limits are. They theorized perfectly about the realms that are beyond our reach. Huge props to who ever made this graph. It's a great mental model
Seriously, this paper is bunk. They put the hubble radius on the graph like a physical object; it's not. Even when referring to the entire universe; it doesn't belong on the graph, the universe IS the graph.
@@kenengel620 My beef too with the video, I can understand it if they added it for reference while plotting "sizes", but materializing the observable universe as an object with distinct property feels like a stretch.
Anton, as much as you can explain these things to a dumb guy like myself, I’m still blown away from the massive information of the universe. Great vids!
just a little downplay: he’s just reading articles and this task not even quick cause when I was invested and had enough time, I observed that I was up front and he posted things i was reading weeks ago. I want to say that he is not superhuman and knows this all to present it to us, it’s “just” a news show.
@@fabulamcafeeSo where are your videos? Not sure what your flex is. You used to read articles when you had more time? Congratulations, Mr. Smartypants.
@@johnn.2017 wtf. i could flew btw, but my intention was to explain that anton is not smarter than us and that tyy7760 could be like him, if he finds the time to create videos.
@@fabulamcafee Sorry, the encouraging part of your comment was not clear. I'm guessing that English is not your first language (which to me means you're smarter than me; I only speak one) so I apologize that I did not understand your intention. Have a great day, beautiful person!
@@johnn.2017 communication is about sending and receiving. i guess i have to "send" better to not be misunderstood. wish you good.
Brother, your videos, in their way, have helped me through a lot of years. Thank you. Please never stop being the wonderful person you are.
So if we live in a black hole... does that mean each black hole in our universe contains a universe themselves? Maybe all of reality is just an infinite series of black holes? We live in a bag of infinite holding.
Look up lee smolin and cosmic natural selection. It indeed proposes that every black hole creates another universe with slightly different laws and overtime (hence natural selection), universes tuned to creating the most black holes will become dominant, what’s more is we happen to live in one such universe which is very nicely tuned for creating black holes.
A bag of infinite other bags. Maybe each one with different rules and existance.
No. The matter/energy of this universe will all exit through black holes that converge into the singularity that will spawn the next universe.
@@sprightlyrandom1550I disagree. I think all black holes lead to the same next universe...the singularity that spawns it anyway.
It would certainly explain where my missing socks go when the wife does the laundry. If we add up all the socks that go missing in the laundry, that mass must be somewhere. There's no black hole close enough to explain the phenomenon, but if we're already inside a black hole, that makes perfect sense.
yeah i noticed this a few years back that the density of the universe is very close to the critical density you would need to make a black whole of the size of the entire universe.
wow, this way of putting things together is one of the most exciting things Anton so far has brought to us!
it also makes him really deserve the title "Instant Anton" !
Child me feels a lot of validation now. Been thinking this for almost 30 years ever since I started to get into Hawking’s works.
Did you also see where they made wrong assumptions? BlackHoles are tricky! But they solve a lot of cosmologic confusion, if thought thru to an end .... 🚀🏴☠️
Did you miss where he said we don’t live in a black hole
He did not say that. He said its unlikely because no one knows why the external Universe should be empty. I have an explanation for that and it makes absolutely sense that it is empty. Because everyone misses the Time dialation. And the fact, that from our perspective of the time dialation "we" or our Blackhole would have swallowed everything in existance that it coukd have ever collided with literally in all eternity of time of the mother universe in one splitsecond in our time perspective. Everyone who does not understands this just misses the time dialation.
@@diefirmenwandler8667 he said we should assume we’re not living in a black hole..Word for word. And the problem is with density, not time dilation or as you’re putting it “the time dialation.” Its dilation. And there’s no “the time dilation.” It’s just time dilation. No one is missing time dilation at all, that’s a difference found in general relativity. It has nothing to do with making or explaining zero density. I’m not trying to be rude but the way you’re speaking about it makes no sense whatsoever for this topic. You wouldn’t apply time dilation as a difference for what the black hole is swallowing elsewhere and us when the issue is that there’s no zero density according to our math and to try to force there to be would contradict mountains of established physics
12:14
Anton every time I listen to you I am mind boggled. you are able to explain in simple language the most complex of subjects - I think you are wonderful. God Bless You - you are the smartest person on the internet.
Another bot comment
@@DolphLundgrensDolphinDungeon Anton uses bots?
@@thrwwccnt5845 could be anyone
Congrats to who made this graph is so simple, since it points out something that's intriguing just by laying out what we know. 😆 love your videos Anton, my mind is buzzing with ideas and intrigue! 👍👍
This is an amazing paper you’re detailing. This definitely is in line with what Neil Turok is saying. Watch his recent PI public presentation. Universe is simpler that we expect it to be. Thank again for your hard work in sharing this with everyone!!!!!!!🎉
I've long wondered whether we experience the "arrow of time" because we are inside a black hole and are bound to always head towards the singularity.
Time dilation in this context is simply the observable effect of speeding up sufficiently to ever so slightly divert our future light cone away from that singularity, thereby slowing our fall towards it (keeping in mind that time and space are swapped inside a blank hole).
I'm no scientist though and these are just my own rambling thoughts. 😊
All in all we’re just perceiving a cosmic process. Time in one direction. The fact that other intelligent beings perceive time differently doesn’t seem far off. Just not the reality of our specific condition. Just endless possibilities.
That's interesting. Of course, the Third Law states that entropy in general always increases. The truth may lie in the fact that we need to move towards entropy to be able to act against it, to create order. But, if total order was the final "end state", then the universe would be entirely uniform and immovable - thus a "singularity".
So, perhaps the other black holes we perceive (or rather "assume") are actually reverse running universes that we cannot reach because their "arrow of time" is the opposite of ours, and we are perceived as a simple black hole as seen from those universes.
I always viewed the "arrow of time" of physical time as unavoidably pointing towards the heat death of the universe due to the unavoidable inevitability of total entropy of the universe's _closed system_ , that its "accelerating expansion" nature is inevitably leading us towards.
(Eng is my 2nd language, so pardon me if that sentence doesn't make any sense.)
I wonder if anyone has ever compared these two ideas (yours and mine), and come up with a probability comparition.
Even this video ties into the argument that I present: It explains whether the universe is a closed system (i.e. it has a boundary) or an open system (i.e. no boundary -> we live inside a black hole.
Turns out, there is a boundary to the extire universe, which leads to...
The universe is a closed system
It is unavoidably moving towards an entropic heat death
This makes the arrow of time itself unavoidable
i.e. _physical_ time always marches forward.
Related: So, going back in time should not be possible. Hence, *reality* won't ever have to confront many of the time-travel paradoxes that such time-travel would cause.
But, that doesn't take away from the fact that considering these praradoxes is still fun, and they sometimes lead to cool sci-fi stories.
If a black hole is inside a black hole do space/time swap back to normal in the inner black hole or do they get twisted even further? 😅
Thanks!! I stared at that chart for an hour when it came out and got nothing from it. This really helped, so now I’m going back again.
InstAnton was first introduced to me by our rock star Anton!!!!
Thanks, Anton, for the InstAnton reference! I'm now on my way to an entirely new area of study!!!☮ We love you and keep on doing what you do.😀
This aligns with my assumptions about universes and black holes!
"Hello wonderful Quantumobjects"
instAnton - around 14 billion years ago
So the answer to the meaning of life, the universe, and everything is ......
*"instant Anton!!"*
What a brilliant thing to do -- to get a really big picture including everything we know.
I love integrating all these disparate parts and concepts into one graph -- but I never would have had a clue what the graph meant.
Thanks, Anton, for using your great gift of teaching to help me comprehend so much more every day.
You are like an " Inst-Anton" for the universe of my scientific mind ...
What a fascinating topic. Very intriguing! Love ya, Anton!
8:41 All praise Anton creator of the Universe.
Thanks for creating the universe Anton! I’d been wondering why the days were getting darker recently and thought it might be that winter but it must be due to the black hole we’re living in instead.
Great video as always. Thank you for putting so much effort into explaining what gives you purpose. 👍
I subbed because of that smile. You have great energy. Thank you so much.
The opposite side of the graph is an anti-universe, where basically everything is inverted. The negative density, or zero density, would be maximum density of antimatter and zero density of matter. So even time could be negative, meaning the opposite of our sense of time, where entropy increases indefinitely, this negative would be similar to watch time in reverse where entropy “decreases” in relation to our sense of time. Well, that’s my interpretation.
People think way to much in jing and jang.. i mean, darkness, whats it really? Its the absence of light, and not its own thing. Coldness, its not its own thing to, its the absense of heath.. i dont think a “shadow realm” like you suggest exist. There could be one, but it wont be a plain inverted copy of our universe atleast.. a lots of negatives dont really exist but ate just defined by human to make our realm make more sense.. another one, what is silence? Its not an anti sound, its just no sound..
@@ClosestNearUtopiayou have a point but so do they; both matter and antimatter exists and act as two sides of the same thing. The absence of antimatter in the Universe, and thus the opposites being imbalanced, could be explained by their hypothesis. However, as you say, other non-physical properties like entropy and time being inverted is questionable, especially since antimatter functions exactly the same as matter with regards to the laws of the Universe.
@@kingdmind yes its true some things do have a negative if itself. But are they really the inverse of what we think it is? I mean If i will play a song, and will play the same song with the phase inverted, it will cancel each other out and the sound will be gone. Just like how we make active noise canceling. So we cancelled out noise with noise, and not noise being canselled out with anti noise we cant perceive, by listening to the tracks separately there is also no way to tell if a sound is a invert of itsself since it already consited out or a wave. Just like how we mix sinuses its is possible to cancel things out with more of it.
You should read "A Clash of Cymbals" the last of the "Cities in Flight" series by James Blish, in which he posits something very like this, with an anti-universe that's approaching our own an will shortly intersect with it.
@@davidandrews2972 so what if, what if our counter galaxy will meet, will that mean we end up in a paradox not existing and or even be erased from time, will we crystalise? Whats going tho happen!!
I need to put that graph on a wall. Wonderful!
Great Video *-SCATTERED PHOTON-* , keep up the good work!
I really enjoy your videos. Thank you for sharing
You are a wonderful person
Of all your videos I've seen, this has to be in my top 5 favorites! Great topic, thanks for covering it 😀
I started to wonder about 15 years ago if the Big bang was a bit like the creation of black hole from the inside or a white hole. And the more I've read about the holographic Universe and Leonard Susskind work, the more is starts to make sense.
And when you realize that each black hole in our Universe might become a universe, it makes the head spin.
It reminds me of a video game I’ve played called Destiny. The awoken lived within a pocket universe inside a black hole. I’ll give you lore excerpt for understanding.
_---"We have detected a pattern that was imprinted into our universe by its ancestor: a fingerprint of the initial conditions into which existence was born. From this information, we have confirmed the most primordial of Awoken myths. Our universe is a subset of another. We live within a singularity, a knot in space-time, that orbits a star in another world._
_"Conventional relativity would suggest that time outside an event horizon passes quickly compared to a clock within, but our universe has a peculiar relationship with its mother. Thousands of years have passed for us on the Distributary. Outside? Centuries, at most. We are a swift eddy in a slow river._
Space is a "fabric" eventually its bound to tear. All that mass finally rips the fabric, boom big bang on the other end
Did you miss the argument in the video (and the paper) showing that we do _not_ live inside a Black Hole?
@@joshlewis575 So you didn't understand that calling space a "fabric" is just a metaphor?
Doesn't our Big Bang model sound alot like a large scale anti matter reaction?
What if the two are connected somehow? A volume of space filled with antimatter suddenly has matter introduced and a huge "explosion" and chain reactions occur ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
it's always good to introduce varying perspectives to make one think
thanks for the information anton
That was so intriguing! I love this. Anton you are the best at what you do.
Double forbidden physics, just fantastic!
I do think it’s an interesting concept. The fact that the farthest galaxies are moving faster away from us always made my peasant brain suspect they’re just falling closer and closer into a black hole than we are
Thanks Anton for explaining this graph. I was intrigued when I first saw it as it raises some fascinating possibilities.
"... instant Anton ..."!!!! Your videos are always interesting, (relatively) easy to understand. Keep it up!
I had gotten spooked when I saw this graph a few days back. Glad you could explain it so brilliant. I think a three dimensional graph of the same would stirr things a bit 🎉
and what's the third axis then?
@@cobaliusI’d add temperature 😅
We are so fortunate to be living in a golden age of scientific discovery, and to have charismatic personalities to translate the technical into the digestible. Cheers Anton!
no kidding! and Anton makes it so accessible for us all, it's amazing.
Absolutely fascinating. Thanks Anton 😊
It's black holes inside black holes, all the way down and up. Popping in and out of existance in a scale invariant quantum foam, exapnding and collapsing in a never ending battle to balance the energy density of an infinite spacetime
Between all this chaos there's humans trying to figure out stuff.
Exactly... Yes, just what I was thinking!🤔👌
I’ve always had that theory we are the creation of another universe black hole or singularity!
Theory means that you've done the math, and your model fits all known data, no matter how diverse.
@@_John_PThe William Hypothesis
same
@simontmn Don't make fun of the creator, the great Buckman of all Buckmans.
same! and I also have the munchies
thanks for this. glad you’re feeling better. hair looks good, too
Thank you Anton for all information you give us!
The rule that an object forms a black hole when it fits inside its Schwarzschild radius only applies to static objects. The universe is expanding so it escapes this condition. However, white hole models of the big bang universe are possible if we are prepared to give up homogeneity outside the observable universe limit, and why wouldn't we be?
If somehow homogeneity breaks outside of OUR observable universe (why? are we SOOOO special?) it makes no fuckin mathematical sense that inside of any even remotely resembling black hole would be homogeneous. It pains to even here such thoughts, honestly, as Swarzshield black hole for which that radius is coincidentally similar to radius of observable universe at exactly THIS POINT IN TIME is nothing like the universe we observe. Applying Sw radius to the universe is like saying that water has consciousness because it's roughly the same density as human.
As a scientifically-literate layman, white-hole models of the Big Bang are my favourite area of speculation in cosmology. I can't explain why, but it just seems like such an aesthetically pleasing concept. I'm prepared to throw the idea away if evidence mounts against it, but until then, I'm rooting for it!
@@avelkm Humans are conscious in that they try to obey the laws of morality. Animals are conscious in that obey the laws of nature/instinct. Particles are conscious in that they obey the laws of physics by how they were designed/their observable properties. It's not a stretch when you take it down these steps. Humans came out of this universe. I think panpsychism is the most valid theory of consciousness we have at the moment. I think consciousness is best defined as what level of awareness you are at. It takes a bunch of conscious particles to ultimately create a conscious being. I don't think the cells in your body know they have created a human being, and it is certainly true these things are more aware than a rock. Eventually these multiple levels of awareness compound and stack on top of each other until we reach our level of awareness.
Please leave conspiracy stuff to dedicated feeds.
@@avelkm If you want to understand cosmology beyond the pop-sci level I suggest you start by studying the Lemaitre-Tolman model.
Brilliant! So many thanks for this Anton!
Always learning, thanks 😊
I love the humour I've recently been seeing in the videos :)
Instanton: Anton instance, worldwide known to be both unique and wonderful.
Amazing episode! Thanks!
Man u are awesome, and explain things so well. Great work buddy 👏👏👏
I would honestly not surprised if this were actually the case. It makes intuitive sense if you vaguely understand the concept of black holes and just how the universe functions.
Makes even more sense the more you understand. Eggheads are gonna dismiss this because it makes the dark force obsolete. 🚀🏴☠️
12:14
I just learnt that Anton is the building blocks for the answer to everything 😂
Wonderful video with wonderful insights!
Good vid as always!
(inst)Anton created the universe, and now he's here to explain it to us! 🎉
I've been waiting for over a week, in hopes that Anton would cover this paper. Dreams do come true I suppose 🎉
My favourite part of your videos is your greeting: Hello, wonderful person! Thank you! You make my day, every day!
Deep and fascinating episode, thanks, Anton!!
I always wondered if black holes were just more universes since I don't see if there are any observable white holes. I had the idea that maybe all that matter is just another big bang for another universe.
@Anton Petrov
Please read this:
I have a somewhat broken time perception which makes me able to percieve time kind of as one singular piece. I tell since more than a decade even since before I have ever heard from that believe from anyone else, that we live in a blackhole. And I also think that we see the things at the edge of the universe in realtime. Just that the time there runs infinately slow compared to ours (from the outside perspective - not from ours). And the same goes the other way around. Also the speed of light towards oneself is infinitely fast and the other way around its half the "speed of light c". Making the information speed equaling C. (There is a nice Video about it why mankind has never really measured the actual speed of light and its also not colliding with the relativity theory) And even albert Einstein said his concepts are only true if what I said is assumed to be wrong.) The attribute of this configuration causes oneself to be always the one thing in the universe that moves the fastest through time. But at the edge of the event horizon we run infinitely slow viewed from everything outside the Event horizon. Because viewed from the outside we are a singularity like a punct like entity where the time runs infinitely slow.
So what does it mean. That means that from outside perspective. The universe should have appeared in a split second at the beginning (to our timestandards (consuming the Star or whatever comparable entity accumulated the mass in the beginning.) In the center it would have formed, and then expanded as long as the "star like entity" collapsed into it. Then the time dialation kicks in. From the inside as it runs infinitely slow compared to the outside. All the time of the external universe from the outside will have passed within the fraction of a second from our inside perspective. So everything that this Blackhole will ever collide with within Quadrillions of Quadrillions of Millenia will happen in a splitsecond from our perspective until there is nothing that can further all into it. (Dropping the density outside to Zero). Because everything that could have ever been fallen into the Blackhole ever, happened in the first second of our Universe. So the density outside is zero exept all other Blackholes that had escape velocity at one point.
So our universe probably expanded ridigulously fast in the beginning filling everything then gettin filled even more but slower and then slower and slower until nothing could fall into it anymore throughout eternity and then it just expanded into the direction of time. (Once spacial or time dimensions run to infinity they flip on the axis and become the other.)
It absolutely makes sense. We live in a blackhole. And I have more arguments but if anyone has a different opinion please prove me wrong.
Thanks for everything, Anton.
thanks for highlighting this. it is an ingenious presentation, which will surely lead to lots of insights.
Maybe we live in another universes hypothetical universe in a black hole.
This. It could be endless, made a posit via comment a few videos back about this: an endless loop from one point to the other, universes within each black hole within each universe.
How insane would it be if it were true 🤔
@@TrayTerrawell physics likes fractals
Infinite regress.
its turtles all the way down
@user-qd3fm8te8oBlack holes are not theoretical objects.
If we live in a black hole, therefore in a confined space, this wouldn't explain dark matter? Think for a minute, we know that massive objects distort space itself, therefore the space itself has some type of fluid characteristic, like when you put a object in a container with water, and you move the container, the object will have resistence against the fluid, why not the objects in the observable universe behave the same way?
If space is a fluid it would be something far exceeding a superfluid, and so it woulsnt care about friction or resistance.
Dark energy could be the evaporation of our hypothetical black hole universe. The universe is losing energy and getting colder. And this is the effect dark energy has on the energy density of our observable universe.
What are you getting at is unclear.
No gas in space to push. No flying or swimming. Fluid dynamics goes out the window when there is only radiation and virtual particles. Virtual particles are "real" particles that come into existence long enough to interact with its anti particle. They quickly destroy each other. This is the premise of hawking radiation.
I'll try. If BigBang is a BlackHole, just only observed from the opposit end, it would show dark forces as fairy tales, what they truely are.
Thats about as far as anybody can get out of yout writing.🚀🏴☠️
You are on the right track. Space can’t be in the same space at the same time. That is to say, planckspace cannot superimpose itself on another’s instance of planckspace. This means that space itself behaves like a particle. Wrap your head around space as a particle and everything will start making sense.
I want an Instant Anton mug! Great topic, thanks 🙏
Thanks, Anton! You're the best
I think a simpler way to marry quantum physics and classical mechanics is to try to create particles out of nothing but gravity and light. I think the key reason particles exist is because it isn't possible to hit a singularity. Anything that would move toward a singularity would miss it. If that thing is attracted to the singularity somehow, it would necessarily orbit it. The orbit could be infinitely tiny but it would never be able to hit it. The movement would never end. I think fundamental particles are light orbiting infinitesimally tiny singularities.
Infinite focus on a time variation approaching zero… mix this limit (which is the definition of derivate) with Laplace Transform, but in frequency domain
that would be an interesting idea, but singularities that small would dissipate away thanks to hawking radiation, by way of the singularities pulling apart the spontaneously generating particle-anti particle pairs
Unless they're not gravitational singularities, I guess
@@Gogglesofkrome Or if they are naked singularities.
Is it possible for a black hole to get so big that it just suddenly dissolves because it's density does not allow it to retain its nature of being a black hole?
That's basically the end result of Hawking Radiation, no? The Universe just hasn't existed for long enough for any naturally formed Black Hole to dissipate this way.
Iirc, plenty of man-made black holes have destroyed themselves thanks to this phenomenon. This was the source of the backlash regarding the large hadron collider when it first started running, because its collisions create miniature black holes, and we didn't have conclusive proof yet that they wouldn't escape containment and consume the planet.
Naked singularity is a theory that you will probably find interesting.
According to General Relativity theory - no, it would still remain a black hole with a horizon and all its other props.
@@thedeemon Thank you for the answer, while watching the video the idea of a black hole growing so big and losing it's density enough to not be a black hole anymore would probably result in a really big bang. Next question, how fast would the universal expansion rate need to be to tear apart a black hole?
@@MasterElements Remember that black holes, as they are described in GR, are vacuum solutions of Einstein equation: all their mass is concentrated at the singularity (point or ring), and the rest of the volume is empty space. That's what allows them to have formally low density - you divide the mass in singularity by the volume of empty space around, limited by the horizon. So this low density doesn't mean the black hole is weak or smth. So, even if there is strong space expansion factor, since BH's mass is still concentrated at singularity, nothing can make it unwrap or tear apart.
I sometimes experience "instant Anton", whenever anton uploads and I get a notification and instantly tap on it!
Mind bending. Thanks Anton!
In a way we are in a black hole. Because of the increasing expansion of the universe there are parts of the universe we will never 'see' and will never 'see' us because expansion is moving us apart to quickly for light to ever travel that increasing distance. This is called the Lambda horizon. However that also means every part of the universe will at some point become its own 'black hole' as it relates to distance other parts. Though I think its more of an event horizon than a singularity.
There is a cosmological event horizon, but a black hole is defined (loosely) as a compact region of spacetime hidden behind a horizon.
About 30 years ago, I was lying in bed working out the likely "Schwartzschild Radius" size to calculate whether the Universe could be a "black hole" that would not need extreme phenomena happening within our visible universe. I decided the Universe was big enough to have an immense Schwartzschild Radius whose event horizon wasn't easily obvious.
SchwartzschildRadius derives from mass, but the BlackHole is still only a dot in spacetime. A point with essentially no radius, no dimension.
Oh, was there just a magic word? BlackHoles are actually forbidden by quantum physics. Neutronstars are already good for eggheads headaches. Merge two and the damn thing decreases its size dramatically. Not enough that, it eats everything that gets near. Into a point .... 🚀🏴☠️
We can detect black holes from 13 Billion light years away, but we don't even know how many tanks does Russia have.
(Unrelated)
❤❤❤❤thanks Anton.. for this and all other great reports🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷👍👍👍❗️
So I am a complete lay person who loves your videos so much. You make complicated issues seem much more simple. And I LOVE your smile at the end of the video. I did have a thought though; Wouldn't the accordion style universe ("Big Bounce") help explain the Zero point as you were saying?! If this is a nonsense question. please forgive me.
If the universe existed inside a black hole, could that explain why it's expanding?
In all likelihood it isn't expanding. The theories on the expanding universe have struggled a lot to stay afloat in light of younger galaxies exhibiting the same observable effects as the older galaxies in many cases. That said, it's possible everything is getting smaller, which creates the effect of things moving away from us/shrinking. If you were standing a few feet away from me and started shrinking to the size of an ant, it's easy to say you're shrinking, but if you're a quarter mile away and I can't even tell what direction you're facing, it looks like you're moving away from me. If the James Webb telescope has discovered anything, it's that we had barely a clue as to how far things actually are. At this point it's looking like the speed of light isn't so much a factor in our ability to see out into the universe as our ability to see things relative to other things to gauge their real distance.
No, if, we did not expanding, Black hole is kollaps, If we started as a exploding black hole, we goin the right way. Only my thords
@@hurtighansen1what
@@grawss >That said, it's possible everything is getting smaller, which creates the effect of things moving away from us/shrinking.
I'm glad this idea is catching on, in combination with a fractal-like universe of black holes inside black holes.
Assuming that intergalactic space contains a given number of atoms per cubic meter, we can predict a consequence of math for the absorbing and scattering of photons as it passes through light years of said space. Factoring in interstellar space, we have a greater impact on said photons. This is called attenuation and it gives the impression of expansion. Go put a magnifying glass on some very small print. Inside the relative bubble of the magnifying glass, all the print is readable. Outside of the bubble everything is micro print. By moving the magnifying glass you can change the relative position of "now" and "here". In this way our galaxy appears as a fuzzy red blob from the fuzzy red blobs we are seeing with our telescope. Hope that helps you. Basically the universe is as developed there as it is here. The fuzzy red blobs are now fully formed Galaxies in the bubble of their own relativity but we can't see them as they currently exist.
An expanding universe implies a point of origin. Should it be assumed that since the observer is always the center of the observable universe that there is no point of origin beyond the observer?
Well, the observer isn't the center. That seems unlikely. Why would it be.
@Happy_Broom: "An expanding universe implies a point of origin."
No, it doesn't. Why do you think so?
@@bjornfeuerbacher5514 if it's expanding, it started somewhere, no?
@@father3dollarbill The expansion started everywhere at once, not at one single point.
8:41 It's about damn space-time, we named something after Anton!
2:24 I had the opportunity to listen to Prof Charles's lectures on astrobiology during my post-grad. Truly an amazing person and a passionate researcher!
Instant Anton, the start of everything. I like that.
🕉It was quite funny to see how Anton just realized that he was the center of the universe and the cause of everything in his life that manifests itself from instant)🙏
Imagine when he finds out we are him and he is us, that we all exist simultaneously in infinite space time nexi, time-space nexi and ‘out’ of time and space. 😊
the mathmatical model of a blackhole and out universe have been very similar for decades, this isn't really new, just a new visualization of it. this makes sense also. i first saw the models in one of Stephen Hawking's books from over 20 years ago. it makes you wonder about some things.
NO IT DIDNT!!......YOO DIDNT WONDER BOUTA THING!!!😠
"Ultimate Graph of the Universe Shows" sounds downright bureaucratically Vogoun.
Thanks for the video, Anton!
Intructor Anton instructing us on instanton is something I needed
I'm curious if we are in a black hole, what physical properties, if any, might differ from our own in the black hole containing universe
Maybe the outside obeys quantum physics.
Nothing would be different. Except that dark forces would be even more unlogic than now. 🚀🏴☠️
How much energy would it take if you concentrated it in one place before you make matter appear according to E=mc^2? And what would happen if you concentrated that energy at the centre of a black hole and a piece of matter came into existence? Would the black hole turn inside out?
I think according to this graph, the Instanton's mass might be the number you're after. But it's mass/energy and density together that allow the two to interchange.
More accurately you could ask: What's the smallest possible amount of energy I could condense into a very small point and end up with massive particles?
Oh my sweet child... (no). You can have an answer for that. Open Wikipedia and look for mass of any "matter" particle. They are expressed in eV (MeV for protons and neutrons) which are ... units of energy!!! We create matter from energy all the time in particle accelerators, it's what they are built for. And it's not a lot at all.
kind of answered your own question there! how much matter do you want? 90 million billion joules will get you a kilo according to e=mc^2. if you only wanted a breadcrumb, say then 90 gigajoules should get you a decent one. of course, density and avagadro, binding energy of a nucleon etc. are going to complicate things somewhat and atoms are famously empty so you would have to distribute the energy fairly unequally over the expected volume of your wanted material.... yeah. not as easy as i thought it'd be.... anyway, 90 jiggajoules is the energy content of 750 gallons of gasoline. if you could burn all that within the space of a breadcrumb then you'd get a toasty, tasty result! :)
Fascinating stuff! Any ideas what the third corner of the triangle might represent?
Finally, someone else is thinking along my idea of how we exist.
We have to be inside a black hole in order of matter to exist, as energy needs to be traveling near the speed of light in order to become matter.
Assuming that we can't get out of the universe then the conclusion is quite straight forward and quite simple: we might as well be in a black hole, however it makes no difference because we're stuck in.
A question: if a blackhole is created by a super massive star collapsing, does that mean that universes are created from such thing happening? It just seems so obscure and unlikely
Thats a micromass black hole. Its therefore only a tiny universe. Assuming Bang & BlackHole are two opposit ends of same phenomenm. 🚀🏴☠️
As others have mentioned, you must also consider time dilation and the reversal of time & space inside a black hole. From the point of view inside, all of time has happened regarding all that is outside of it. Perhaps a constant recursive situation between all black hole universes.
@@NefariousKoel buddy time dilation is appropriate for describing effects around or near a black hole. Not inside a black hole. Again you people are running around acting like you understand time inside a black hole
😊 loved this. Very interesting.
It's instant Anton hahaha, always have the most informational videos with little to none click baits ty for all your vids
God said, "Instant Anton.", and Creation replied, "Hello wonderful person!"
What if we draw that graph 5 billions years ago when observable universe was smaller?
It honestly makes zero sense, implying that we are once again somehow special and are situated just in the center, and also somehow universe is homogeneous on a big scale and then suddenly stops. I highly doubt black holes are homogeneous inside, it doesn't make any sense. But Anton already said that it breaks all physics. Intriguing coincidence though.
It has never been smaller. It has always existed. It will always exist.
@@generator6946Yikes.
5 billion years ago it's not that the universe was smaller. It's the fact that long ago no one was observing the universe per se, and had no tools to observe as far as we can today. Currently, our biggest hurdle is getting data beyond what we can currently observe which will require better tools and advancements in technology. Even then we will still not be able to answer every question as I'm sure even more questions will arise.
That's an interesting question. I like your thinking/reasoning skills. My interpretation of your question is this:
Since the universe has been expanding (and accelerating) during the last 5 billion years but the mass has remained constant, the mass density ratio of the universe is lower today than 5 billion years ago (and is constantly going down over time as the universe continues to expand). In short, today the Hubble Radius is on the line as shown at 6:08 in the video but would not have been on the line 5 billion years ago when the universe was smaller but had the same mass (a more dense universe).
If my understanding of your thinking is correct then the answer to your question is no. Your reasoning is fine but when dealing with (natural) log scales, perspective changes extremely fast. One unit of change on the graph is an order of magnitude. Two units of change is two orders of magnitude and so on. In short, the volume of the universe could double, triple or quadruple and it would be a minor nudge on the graph.
If it helps, imagine the Empire State building (102 floors). If we represented it in natural log floors, it would only be two stories tall. The average building in the US is ten stories or less (1 natural log) while the Empire State building and all taller buildings are only 2. We would have to build a skyscraper 1,000 stories tall to make a 3 story natural log building.
This is so cool! ❤
The Instant Anton is my reaction to a video of yours after work. (I also recognize the Instanton as yours)
I think i've learned more from instantAnton in last 6 years than i learned in 32 years of my life in schools university and beyond . thanks
Been saying for maaany years black holes are big servers, makin universes out of the information extracted from the things they eat. Kinda fun to see that something similar actually is being looked into nowdays 😂
When I was a little kid I was extremely fascinated with black holes. Then in high-school I suggested to my friend what if the universe rinse-repeats itself by every black hole consuming one another and a big bang is made from 1 black hole that contains everything
@@Antelopesinsideme yeeeh thats kinda that im thinking too! Black holes would be a nice multiverse explanation aswell haha
@thaflowie only if they didn't tear everything entering them into nothing, then the thought would be more settling...lol
@@Antelopesinsideme yeah but if u look at it like: it tears everything down to its basic information then like a computer that information is used to creates something like a simulation universe in there it can still add up 😂 dont ask me how it could do that, but i like to think that we're like small programs floating in the information soup and reading the information into something visible hahaha