The Death & Suffering At The Dark Age's Bloodiest Battles | Medieval Dead | Chronicle
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 20. 06. 2024
- This series reveals true stories of medieval life by examining the skeletal remains that lie buried below the earth's surface. Combining atmospheric, dramatic reconstructions of gripping stories with archaeological science, Medieval Dead takes viewers deeper into the Dark Ages than ever before.
The series traces and sifts through the remains of the Medieval Dead.
00:00:00 Richard III's Lost Chapel
00:46:39 Last Stand at Visby
01:32:39 Agincourt's Lost Dead
Welcome to Chronicle; your home for all things medieval history! With documentaries covering everything from the collapse of the Roman Empire to the beginnings of the Renaissance, from Hastings to Charlemagne, we'll be exploring everything the Middle Ages have to offer.
Subscribe now so you don't miss out!
Chronicle is part of the History Hit Network. To get in touch please email owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
It's like Netflix for history... đș Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'CHRONICLE' đ bit.ly/3iVCZNl
It's like Netflix for history... đș Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'CHRONICLE' đ bit.ly/3iVCZNl
As much as we (and I) complain about all of the problems we have in modern life Iâm really really glad I was born in this time period.
It's highly likely many people said the same thing all those centuries ago.
No joke.
Its hurts so bad to just bump ur hands in the cold !! I couldn't imagine hand to hand combat in the âïžđ„¶ winter!!!!
They should do another documentary with just thirty minutes of animated medieval skeleton combat. I would watch that on a loop.
I was in a prison riot in 1995 that left 2 dead and many hurt. Just the sounds of people being hit and kicked will always be in my brain. I saw a man crawl begging for help while his guts were coming out. It was disturbing and scary as hell. I can't imagine 60,000 going at it with swords!!!
I know one thing.. our ancestors had to be some pretty tough people, all down the line from the very beginning of our species. The hardships, diseases, horrific wars and starvation etc- they all survived it to enable us to be here in present day.
Iâve thought this many times. The plight of human beings is truly an amazing one!
Its called time travel
Facial reconstruction would be interesting.
My ancestors were involved in the "Wars of the Roses" and were participants at Towton and Bosworth. I admire these men, on both sides, who fought such a brutal war. I'm a pretty tough guy, but wonder how I would have held up.
You probably would have died from some disease before you even made it onto a battlefield.
That's life.
I know, I too wonder about the same thing, not just the times during the civil wars, but about 14th or 10t century Europe, or the Roman Republican or Imperial periods, during the early Greek city states or the time of Sumer.
I think my mind would be excited, my heart would be super excited, - but I'm afraid I must suggest, that my body would be super dead ! đ„Ž
It all kinda feels like to me as though I were thumbing through a book about all of mankind's time here on Earth, and as I neared my-own time and the turning of pages grew ever slower, I feel like these folks above would rather end-up being on the very same page as myself, and just yesterday. These people and times, places and events, are really just over your shoulder.
And Towton, that battle is legendary ! -
If you've relatives from that, - you're a bloody celebrity in my view ! đ
@@user-up8jx3mt6j since our population is so much more multiplied today than it was back than, the rate of meeting people who have relatives which participated must be like 1 in 15 at least. So, I dont really think it would be thaatttt crazy. Still, interesting.
Richard II Plantagenet is a first cousin, I'm not sure who was in it. I should search for a list of combatants at Towton and see who I have an my Ancestry bingo card.
Lots of Plantagenets, so I'm sure there's a few.
You know if you think about it the entire Island of England is one gigantic grave.
That's the actual rich history and legacy the English empire is so proud of.
Let's dig them up!
England is very small
the whole planet is one giant grave!
Fascinating. The story really came to life for me when both armies tracked along opposite sides the river, the French eager to force engagement while the English desperately trying to evade.
Nice to see the medieval dead series in high quality, thank you
I cant imagine how excellent this video would be if it wasn't saturated with ads every 90 seconds.
I forget about ads since I have premium. I don't have cable or satellite so paying $14 a month to download and have no ads is worth it. The best feature is being able to turn my screen off and sleep while listening to a video like this.
adblocker maybe??? i havnt seen a ad in many years
â@@jrmckimno man don't do that. It like paying for Satan to run in a presidential campaign. They are truly evil I would never pay them a thing regardless how much better it may be.
â@@user-mi9cj6vt1m how? wat? Pls help us all
Man it's a good thing these cameras were so close to the people interviewed; I would have hated to see the tops AND bottoms of their faces in the same shot.
@@michaelmurdock4607 wouldn't they have permission from the copyright holder so that issue would be moot
9
Any time you see shit like this it's to avoid being struck down by the CZcams copyright system.
NOBODY is that going to be that stupid as to think to zoom in like this for no reason.
@@michaelmurdock4607 I don't think its trying to evade copyright issues. The channel says it's part of History Hit network. Im guessing the weird angles are an effect of converting the old tv episode to CZcams.
@@frustrateduser9933 read well because thatâs not what is written.
I have visited Towton battlefield and am going again next week. I had ancestors who fought in that battle and in the battle of Bosworth field. I am a descendant of Anne, the daughter of Richard Plantagenet as well.
I feel so incredibly certain that I understand why the militiamen were buried in their armour.
To honour them.
The Danish mercs likely understood that the militia had been locked out of the city they were trying to protect, choosing then to essentially fight to the death, in a battle in which their loosing would have been a forgone conclusion.
As professional soldiers, itâs doubtful this sacrifice would have been lost on the Danish kings men, nor the would it the king himself.
As far as the value goes, they had too much of it already waiting for them. I donât think anyone mourned their decision to bury the militiamen in their armour as opposed to loot it for its value.
Yes. They were an invading, plundering army, but they were still human, and soldiers at that. I truly believe they let their adversaries be buried in their armour as a way to honour them.
I wonder if any soldiers freaked out and made a run for it.....I would've.đąđ„
"Medieval Dead" is _[no joke]_ the original title that Sam Raimi wanted for _Evil Dead: Army of Darkness..._
Amazing information. Fantastic series. Thank you for sharing this knowledge.
Iâm not sure I can take people seriously when thereâs only one building on a site and it takes them 15 years to locate it because someone moved the front door.
Then you can't fathom the length of time that's passed between its construction and modern times.
"Do you mind if we dig under your house and pull out all the bodies of people who died violently there?"
"We found a bunch of skeletons under your dining room."
I wonder what was going through the home owners' minds at the time. đ€
This is actually so very sad. These men suffered greatly. And for what reason,...in the end it doesn't matter. RIP soldiers
I think it matters. Most wars are utterly stupid.
" i tried so hard and got so far but in the end it doesnt even matter "
King Edward IV was crowned king during this battle. He was one of the better kings but in the end the Tudors came and started lobbing heads off and changing religions and things, soâŠ.yeah the Linkin Park song âin the endâ seems appropriate
Welcome to life!!!!
@@patricialeighton9893 had to fall to lose it all. But in the end it doesn't even matter.
I put my trust in you, push3d as far as I can go, but for this theres only one thing you could show.....
Think about this. It was like a decade before Columbus sets sail to find the new world. We think about this time as though it were shortly after the Romanâs. But it was over a thousand years after them. Man really didnât advance much until 150 years ago
Rome fell in 1453 with Emperor Constantine XI
And Lief Erikson was in Nfld before Columbus hit an island, by 500 years.
This was a few hundred years after the Vikings were in Canada.
The industrial age was only approx 1850s
Egyptians went to a America far before Columbus he was like the 450 person to go there and he was evil and horrible to the natives
yep they got tired of killing off one another from Europe so they sought out new killing grounds such as they did in America and had a field day at it with my ancestors here in Americađ they killed off up to 60 million of them.
The War of the Roses, talk about the ultimate Family Feud. I don't think anyone involved in that one cared what the survey said though.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Medieval Dead! ââź
Chivalry certainly did exist on the battlefield. Chivalry is misunderstood to mean fighting with honor and protecting the innocent and all that, however it really represents the vows made by a knight during their knighting ceremony, which could be anything. The knights vows were whatever they chose to make during the ceremony this could include fighting with Honor and protecting the innocent or it could mean fighting aggressively and never losing a battle or avenging a friend or serving a king or a lord or another nobleman it could be to travel lands, it can be to sire children. A medieval knights vows could literally be anything. chivalry meant nothing more than upholding those vows which sometimes included fighting honorably and protecting the innocent but those were not the vows every knight took.
It's insanity how the previous archeologists didn't excavate each skeleton completely before moving on to the next. It must have been total madness trying to build skeletons with bones that belonged to the same person
Professional archaeology is relatively new. It was the domain of hobbyists for a long time especially in the Victorian days.
Most Excellent!
It must have really sucked sliding around the snow and freezing mud in those shitty armoured shoes
or....extremely fun, depending what side of the hill you're trying to travel
Today it is easy to admire the architecture. These buildings and the religious practices behind them are part of the reason there is so much suffering in the world.
From what I could see, it seems clear the fallen were stripped of everything before interment.
Armour and arms werenât cheap!
Awesome doc!
11:40
"We dont attack each other with big clubs or machete like things anymore"
*LOOKS SIDEWAYS AT LONDON*
You sure about that mate?
I think he meant in combat battles.
Maybe not many hand to hand battles in your neighborhood but itâs a big world, not everyone is armed like Americans
I just want to congratulate you on the thumbnail. I love it!
2 hours in I realized the title was medieval dead, not evil dead
Whers my boom stick
can i get a bowl or two of that?
Right, this is the documentary about Ash going back in time
Yeah that English guy back in 1836 found Ash's Oldsmobile and didn't know what it was so he buried it in that church yard!
The bone specialist speaks so laboriously it's exhausting to listen to
People seem to forget that chivalry was for nobles for the most part. The common soldier was not subject to it and so inevitably they murdered each other when opposed so that the other guy didn't get them first
Them not taking the armor off of the bodies has to do with the honor of the Dead fighting well. They weren't trained they were outnumbered and yet they stood their ground even though they were back against the corner and they fought to the end and they were fighting Danes. Danes are well known for being those types of warriors holding honor and respect above just about all else.
So for these people to have fought them so bravely they're showing them their honor by letting them keep their armor and burying them with it because that's what they would do with their dead.
I thought it had to do with the time of year and how quickly the bodies started decaying.
@@shaggyrumplenutz1610 Its probably a combination of multiple things. But the fact they buried them to begin with rather than letting sit out and rot shows the level of respect they are showing. Usually Danes would only take time to bury and honor their own dead, not the enemy's dead.
@@Dr-Froman makes me wonder if they kinda felt sorry for them being forsaken like they were.
I thought, conversely, that their was actually a knightly ritual of the opposite - of stripping the enemies "iron", their armor, off their bodies. I suppose the point might be that you can tell a lot of how the belligerents viewed each other by whether they left their armor on?
Bullshit, battles weren't chivalrous and nor was the aftermath. No one leaves money on the dead to rot because of some stupid idea like "honor"
Money is money. Valuables are valuable, regardless of how they were obtained. The only reason you leave arms and armor on the battlefield is because it's not worth taking. Either their gear was so trash and outdated that it was worthless or the body was too decayed to strip
It is very certain that the Tudors did everything possible to erase any positives references to Richard III, who, by all unbiased accounts, was an excellent ruler. They would not wished to have any Shrine exist due to his benevolence.
Yeah except for that little child murder thing. That's kind of morally questionable but hey...... A wise man once said "When you play the game of thrones, you win or you die" so..... Fair play I suppose đ
Amen. Richy 3 is my boy.
@@matchavez8530 you mean that think literally all kings did regularly? Dude was raised in a civil war. While he prolly did it. I'm not sure. He admitted all faults but never adm I t thag. The boys sister Elizabeth never blamed him.
FYI, Richard even had the field plowed for the remaining bones and teeth of the Lancastrians, and had them properly buried elsewhere, with all honors. Look it up. Richard wasnÂŽt a bad king at all. Quite the contrary. And he fought in the midst of this very battle. Not at the outskirts. And survived. With his 80 degree scoliosis. What an astounding fighter he must have been!
Didn't he murder his two nephews to steal the Crown: how benevolent!đ«€
What makes these Graves unique was that the gotlanders were buried with their armor. For obvious reasons this was not usually done.
Armor was usually super expensive right? Theyâd strip it and reuse it? Why weâre they typically not buried in their armor?
@katieneubaum4284 For the reason you just explained though in this instance I think it was more to keep it from the gottlandrrs should they try to reuse it.
The crest on the Visby armor... Could it be a hint at the war of the roses? Three roses for three houses. Tudor, York and Lancaster.
The people behind the walls at visby are were cowards. Imagine standing there watching people beg and then be slaughtered whilst youâre safe behind grey walls. Unreal.
They were smart and alive.
@@klockwerk1 they were rich and greedy.
sort of like NATO standing with advanced technology of war whilst Ukraine is destroyed
Completely different time, world view, and lifespan. It's pointless to place moral judgement on history (although inevitably we are lured in). However, that does not mean romanticize it. But, we can judge the present, use history to understand from whence our issues came, AND FIX THEM.
â @@RobertJamesChinneryHobviously itâs not the same at all, nato has flooded Ukraine with arms, large, small, modern and out of date, as well as thousands of improvised weapons like bomb drones and such.
In fact, Ukraine gave up their nukes for a promise that this wouldnât happen, yet it has happened and despite the flood of weapons Ukraine is still a battlefield
I love the guy with the metal detector.
That whole introduction he had was like watching a skit.
The Detectorists!
25:03 Oh my god I'm going to have nightmares for days
Both man and woman have endured the hardest pasts!
Them all being from England and knowing that new buildings were just built over defunct older structures and not considering that possibility makes me question the worth of their degrees.
I do enjoy this type of a stuff but never understood what was gained by the desecration of these grave sites
Way too many commercials. YT extorting people to buy their "service" is not acceptable - especially on history programs.
Itâs going to be hard to lop a foot clean off of someone thatâs on their back kicking up, but if you have your weight all standing in one leg, like you would when trying to reach in for a cut. Same with cuts to the inside of the leg, when lunging forward you step in, this exposed your lead leg and the inside is more exposed, usually at a more oblique angle so the cut could bite in.
You could definitely be right tho, certainly men were routed and killed in flight often, but I think their explanation is more likely from the evidence shown
1:25 So in melee fighting it was probably stabbing and cutting at anyone not looking or double teaming anyone in front. Leg kicks in modern Kick Boxing or MMA come to mind. Two groups stabbing and probing, those just behind stabbing at exposed parts.
Any explanation why this house was built in place of a historic chapel?
So what this show seems to say is that all these poor men died so a man could be king for 2 years?
No, so that his brother could be king. Richard III stole the crown from his brother's heirs. 2 boys that he had murdered. This is why he was so hated.
Edward IV âwonâ the wars of the roses, at least for a time, and he ruled for 22 years. His son Edward was supposed to succeed him, but his brother Richard usurped the throne and the child under his care disappeared. Thatâs why people hate Richard so much.
So massive and major influencing history soldiers were horribly killed so so many itâs mind blowing
Not only is this not the dark ages, it isn't even the Middle Ages.
Richard III was not the "successor" of Edward IV: it was Edward V, son of Edward IV. He was never 'crowned' but he was the recognised successor. It was not necessary to be crowned to be King. Edward VIII was never crowned.
Simon the Metal Bounty Hunterđđ
One and done.
đđ»
Iâm praying that the people in that church courtyard are aware of their brave dead secured below that window and the date 1838.
a good show ruined by too many dam ads
43:20 yall think the way they covered the map with his head when he points ouut the possible western wall was covered on purpose???
One minute in and I get a commercial.
I will take my "Hit" from a proper and true source-a University level History book.
Dig down the center of the hall.
My shins hurt...
1:29:24 Bernard Cornwell, in his writing, mentions the phrase, â beware the blow that comes from beneath your shield.â
If the militiamen were using shield wall tactics, apparently it was a common tactic to attack the only part of the rank of men that is not covered by the shield wall, the lower legs.
My God the damn Danes were the original Ankle Biters
"I found that mass grave.. " thought it was the builders
I always wonder about dna testing for these type of show like the 3 bodies they found in the first episode but then Iâm not a scientist and donât know how long dna is okay for
I believe they use the teeth when it comes to older skeletons like these.
Yet again, I have seen this before. Why donât they put the original airing date???đ€·đ»ââïž
Thank you for your comment. I was wondering when I saw the title, but hoping it was new. Now I have to find something else to watch.
OH, you poor thing.
Even with all the death and suffering of the Dark Age, you can tell the people really took pride in their appearance from the photos from back then. Don't be a dark ageist!
Our ancestors were magnificent . We are a true embarrassment
Imagine the dead seeing what their doing screaming I died from so and so
Iâm watching while commenting and Iâll delete if I come across the answer, but it seems most of the deceased were not buried with their armor. Would they really have taken the time to remove it before burying someone?
I'm guessing it depended on the circumstance. If you were killed and were on the losing side your swords and armor would be taken as it was worth a lot. If you die and you are on the winning side you might get buried in your armor?
It speaks to the wealth of rhe town that the swedes thought not to bother taking the armor to repurpose or sell.
Are any of these three battles in "the Dark Ages"?
Medieval Dead: Fistful of Boomstick
I get that we find all of this amazing. However I assume these people were buried for a reason. Why dig them up again only to have their bones stored in shelves? I'm firm believer in letting the dead rest and respecting how they buried per their customs.
From a practical perspective, if we keep every grave in situ, we'll need a lot more war, disease, & early death to have room for the growing population of the world.
At a certain point a dead body starts to stink, it Ramps up quick so you better deal with asap or just get used to the smell and health hazard but at a certain point they just smell like dirt and arenât much health hazard.
Personally Iâd think it would be nice to get out and stretch your legs after a couple hundred years in the groundâŠ
In all seriousness, if Iâm dead then I doubt Iâll care what happens to my remains but maybe thatâs just me, being outdoors a lot really shows me how nature recycles
I doubt they wore full body armour like that, if they found tips of scabbards tgey woukd have found more bits of metal from the armour i would have thought.
A career as a grave robber
This is the reason for premium membership... advertisement every 5 minutes
Why would dead warriors be buried in armor? Chainmail and plate armor suits were expensive and hard to make-why throw it away? Or was there superstion about wearing a dead man's armor?
Sounds like maybe the gravediggers got to them before the pickers did. You're right, that stuff was very expensive and they wouldn't have just left it.
The battle of Visby - all the dead were buried in armour - because it was summer and the bodies swelled up , and also because their armour was outdated
@@michaelmurdock4607 And you don't want your elbow joint to lock up when defending against an attacker : )
The Gotlanders were said to have been operating as mercenaries and pirates. The bodies swelling in the heat and causing such a stench meant they just wanted to bury it. Much of it had leather and cloth so it would have been worthless from the putrid smell. Not many weapons were recovered.
they theorize about this in the video btw... maybe the danes/mercs were pressed for time and/or maybe they didn't want to deal with the potential of disease as the armor was regarded low quality.
basically even though the armor was valuable, it wasn't valuable enough.
you also gotta take into account that they would need to drag all this heavy metal along with them on their wagons and ships.
imagine having the armor sets of just 100 men, that's like at least a ton or two of weight to carry around + all the other stuff they need to carry with them, like their own armor/weapons, food, tents etc.
Something is off with this video, it's zoomed in too much.
He had Papist in his family.
So...?
Tim is really handsome. đ
Yeah we were badass motherfuckers once. Some still are.. this video is good to fall asleep too.
_"Our use of the phrase "The Dark Ages" to cover the period from 600 to 1000 marks our undue concentration on Western Europe .... From India to Spain, the brilliant civilization of Islam flourished. What was lost to Christendom at this time was not lost to civilization, but quite the contrary .... To us it seems that West-European civilization is civilization, but this is a narrow view."_
- Bertrand Russell
Irrelevant.
As this is about Europe yes it is called the dark ages.
@@terintiaflavius3349 It was early Renaissance
Western people talking about their own history -who would have thought!!!!Your comment is totally irrelevant.
@@kaloarepo288 Exactly what I said.
Wow. So many ads and popups, I can't follow the narrative.
Anyone checked our Scary Spooky Skeletons this Halloween season? đ» đ 𩮠đ
The English on Palm Sunday.
It's obvious to me when I see the legs and feet cut like that that a lot of these men were basically routed and retreating their backs against the wall so to speak they would do what any person being killed with a blade would do that is fall down backwards protecting the head and torso while trying to kick at your assailant putting your legs in the air just like a UFC fighter does when they get hit and fall down trying to preserve the position of full guard and jiu-jitsu so while they were flailing and kicking up at their attackers it was a feudal tactic of a dying man and that would explain so many like wounds and feet wounds especially to feet cut off in one blow you kick your feet up while on your back with your legs closer together and they're struck in the ankle as if striking one limb! That would explain the wounds to the legs and ankles from the inside of the leg .
Punctuation, dude.
Some of the commentsâŠ..đ€Šââïž
I love this but...."savagest"? I guess that word just made it to Canada thanks to you and I'm not sure how to feel about that.
Wtf are you talking about man lol Youâve never heard that word before? You live under a rock?
@@Onlytheclouds Indeed, there are many books under my rock and not one of them has that 'word' in it.
Thanks for guns
Hahaha â€ïžbest comment!
Opens up with an ad. _FIVE MINUTES LATER_ another ad. Why am I paying CZcams to avoid ads?
Didn't Edward fight and win the battle with his homeboy Warrick? Why are they talking about Richard the third?
Edward didn't beat and kill Warwick until 1471 about a decade after the battle of Towton.
Because Richard fought at the battle and had this chapel built to commenorate both of his friends and enemies who fought at the battle. He even had the field PLOWED for the remaining bones of his enemies, and had them reburried.
Imagine dying battle, only to be dug up a couple hundred years later to have your skeleton put in a museum storage closet.
I've never scence anthropologists handle items, w no gloves on hands. Ugh!
Faux scientists, total amateurs. These History Hit documentaries (so-called) disgust me.
Could this type of documentaries be rated according to appropriateness for certain ages?
Do you know if a website has this info?
those are people you cant keep remains in a box on a shelf no respect
Theyâre dead. And have been for a long time. I dont think they need their bones anymore.
Why was there so much war
Religion and family inheritance. These were power hungry leaders !
Men
Because pregnant women weren't allowed to drink
Is*
Ok the lady talking about agincourt and how the French army would have been âwearyâ and ârunning out of foodâ as well really doesnât seem like she knows what sheâs talking about lmao. The battle was literally on French mainland soil, in what world would the French be starving on French soilâŠ.is she saying they were unable to feed their current population as is? Thatâs literally all theyâre doing when theyâre in their own lands with said army, the food just has to be more concentrated in the area for the time being. The English were on foreign soil and needed to maintain extremely long supply lines(for the time, supply lines across the English Channel and a ways into France are fairly long and difficult to maintain in that time). She seemed to really underplay the significant French advantage in the battle, either out of some biased view for whatever reason or just to play devils advocate. I get trying to critique common misconceptions, but even today ALL rumors or myths/legends are based on or have some inherent truth theyâre based off of to begin with. The same goes for agincourt, sure it could be exaggerated at times Iâm sure but thatâs just the way it is when a glorious victory is achieved in the face of insurmountable odds.