A Deep Dive into GM's Newest 2.5 LK0 TURBO I4, This Week on jmcGarage Talk!!

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
  • In this video of jmcGarage Talk I take a closer, detailed look at GMs all new 2.5 Turbo I4 found underneath the hood of the 2024 Chevy Traverse. GMC Acadia, and Buick Enclave. #review #turbo #chevytraverse #gmcacadia #buickenclave #inline4

Komentáře • 65

  • @raymondaparris5140
    @raymondaparris5140 Před měsícem +6

    This engine is smooth, quiet, and powerful. It was designed for reliability using diesel engine technologies and specifications plus tested using the equivalent of a million miles in development. GM would not make such a strong commitment across their SUV and truck brands without doing the due diligence to mitigate failures. I have driven all popular 3 row SUV’s and bought the GMC Acadia Denali for the size and to get a light color interior. This thing is tight and as quiet or more so as anything out there today. In my case, I have a dealer quite close plus there are many GM dealers along the routes I travel most and this was a major factor in our decision.

  • @Zydek28
    @Zydek28 Před 2 měsíci +6

    This LK0 engine is going to be THE ONLY option for the ‘24 Chevy Traverse, ‘24 GMC Acadia, ‘25 Buick Enclave. I wish they would’ve stuck a turbo on a V6 instead.
    GM must be confident in this LK0, sticking a brand new motor in 3 vehicles all in the same 12 month span 😮

  • @johngerwig8064
    @johngerwig8064 Před dnem +1

    I was all excited about driving the new Acadia and wow, what a disappointment. The vehicle itself looks nice and the interior is outstanding. The engine was pathetic and underpowered for a vehicle of this size. It also sounded like it was going to explode when I really stepped on the gas. The whiny and screeching from this thing was unreal. Sure, you can get it to move down the highway just fine, but the lack of acceleration off the mark was very disappointing. No way I would pay $60k for a something with a little four-banger turbo. I think GM really missed the mark here and I suspect that down the road we'll see lots of issues with this engine.

  • @PWRVTEC
    @PWRVTEC Před 2 měsíci +2

    the 3.6 LGX in my 2021 Colorado requires intake manifold to be removed for 3 of the driver side plugs smh... Also using the engine coolant for the Water to air intercooler is IMO not as good, A separate one would cool better, but depends on boost I guess in this case.

  • @user-yu1vm1ob2w
    @user-yu1vm1ob2w Před 2 dny

    Why the big concern about spark plug maintenance? Change every 100k miles.

  • @Drumma4life7
    @Drumma4life7 Před 2 měsíci +2

    My sister is in love with the new Acadia and could care less about a lot of the things we men care about regarding this 4 banger - my question is what’s your opinion on projected life expectancy and are there any aftermarket modifications that can improve performance that you’d recommend?

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 2 měsíci +3

      Keep after those oil changes and if possible add a catch can to help prolong the life anyway you can

  • @bostonaviation2010
    @bostonaviation2010 Před 2 měsíci +4

    It doesn't have cylinder deactivation.

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 2 měsíci +1

      It's bigger brother which this engine is based heavily upon does and the head design between the two are nearly identical.

  • @randywilliams5042
    @randywilliams5042 Před 2 měsíci +2

    All vehicles are harder to work on today. Have a 2013 Lincoln with an internal water pump.$2200 to repair.

    • @dm19609721
      @dm19609721 Před 4 dny +1

      that must be the 3.5 l engine....In Canada that would be a +$3000 repair bill....tis the reason I stayed away from the Explored/Edge that ran the 3.5L engine....I heard to eco boost is a total disaster.

  • @roymartinez4054
    @roymartinez4054 Před 3 měsíci +4

    Really surprised about the gas mileage. It’s as terrible as the 3.6 they had before.

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 3 měsíci

      You are not wrong

    • @dm19609721
      @dm19609721 Před 2 měsíci +1

      what did you expect, it's hauling a lot of weight

  • @user-yu1vm1ob2w
    @user-yu1vm1ob2w Před 2 dny +1

    2 cylinders and still only 21 mpg

  • @familydad3241
    @familydad3241 Před 3 měsíci +4

    Probably in the 3500 too these days

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 3 měsíci +1

      Knowing GM and the direction they are heading towards it would not surprise me in the least bit

  • @elgatosamurai9517
    @elgatosamurai9517 Před 2 měsíci +2

    Pushing me away from these crossovers with such engines. What a let down. Was considering a 24 Traverse RS or 25 Explorer ST, but even the explorer has a horrible reputation…

  • @b.7660
    @b.7660 Před měsícem +1

    Hello, I enjoyed the video. I am a subscriber waiting for the new Traverse to be released in Korea. I know that this engine is also used in the Traverse. After analyzing and driving this engine, do you recommend it? Do you not recommend it? Also, does it respond quickly and quickly when starting off? For example, sports mode

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před měsícem

      It's an ok engine but servicing the engine would be a bit of a challenge

  • @kyleerickson3382
    @kyleerickson3382 Před 2 měsíci +1

    really hope they put a diesel in it that 3.0 duramax is fantastic

  • @jeremypilot1015
    @jeremypilot1015 Před 3 měsíci +3

    Why are slapping turbos on everything? The original 2.5 Iron Duke got 30 MPG in a Chevy Celebrity back in the 80s. Never needed a turbo, and pulled those wagons with a quickness down the highway. Rode in one all the way to Arizona and back never had a problem.

    • @onsightwoodworks
      @onsightwoodworks Před 3 měsíci +1

      It’s to make everyone happy at the sticker! It’s an easy way to get better gas numbers and power! Hints the mustang, Silverados, Toyotas, etc. little engines, better power numbers and mpg.. it’s just a big circle game

    • @jeremypilot1015
      @jeremypilot1015 Před 3 měsíci

      @@onsightwoodworks Right but here we are not really getting any of those things and we end up with an unreliable POS. I am old enough to remember when we did this before in the 80s Turbo Charge everything and it flopped because it beats up an engine, they don't last as long.

    • @prestondeters5093
      @prestondeters5093 Před 3 měsíci +2

      @@jeremypilot1015 Big difference is weight of the vehicle itself. Vehicles are much heavier than they used to be. I'm sure if you compared directly that old vehicle to this new one, you would feel a major difference in power. These engines are also built specifically to be turbocharged. It isn't the 80s anymore. Blocks and all internal parts are much stronger these days. You can easily make a reliable, turbocharged engine.

    • @jeremypilot1015
      @jeremypilot1015 Před 3 měsíci

      @@prestondeters5093 That is absolutely not true. I owned a 76 Cadillac Sedan De Ville that weighs more than a modern Silverado.

    • @Clay-ul6kz
      @Clay-ul6kz Před 19 dny

      @@prestondeters5093speed limits is a factor too, 55 back then 85 now.

  • @CalgaryHyundai13
    @CalgaryHyundai13 Před 3 měsíci +2

    I've not read anywhere that this is Active Fuel Mgt system

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 3 měsíci +1

      That head design is heavily based on the 2.7 I4 which does have active fuel management

    • @Maxwell1989
      @Maxwell1989 Před 25 dny

      ​@@jmc6000can you reach out to GM?

  • @joseprprprpr
    @joseprprprpr Před 17 dny

    Have you heard any failures/early issues come up with this engine?

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 16 dny

      None with the engine so far but the transmission on the other hand is a different story

    • @Crraziee
      @Crraziee Před 13 dny

      @@jmc6000what’s the info on the transmission?

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 13 dny

      @Crraziee the new 8speed is been having some issues with failures happening early with leaking fluid is the 1st sign

    • @Crraziee
      @Crraziee Před 13 dny +1

      @@jmc6000 ah that’s a bummer. Was looking at the Acadia vs pilot and others and I really wanted to like the Acadia. I’m not too fond of the pilot either in general but that engine has loads of space to work. Not a fan of cylinder deactivation though.

  • @Maxwell1989
    @Maxwell1989 Před 3 měsíci +3

    How do you like the performance

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 3 měsíci +1

      It's OK but nothing to write home about.

    • @onsightwoodworks
      @onsightwoodworks Před 3 měsíci

      Agree! But it’s not bad for a midsize truck! Coming from a hemi 6.7

    • @Maxwell1989
      @Maxwell1989 Před 3 měsíci

      @@jmc6000 did you use sport mode?

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 3 měsíci

      @Maxwell1989 I did and it felt close to the same as normal

    • @Maxwell1989
      @Maxwell1989 Před 3 měsíci +2

      @@jmc6000 well from the other reviewers they said once the sport mode is selected a really livens up and is ready to accelerate

  • @itzraylensfamily5622
    @itzraylensfamily5622 Před 24 dny +1

    Where is the water pump located?

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 23 dny

      Outside in front of the engine driven off the serpentine belt

  • @rajandseema123
    @rajandseema123 Před měsícem +2

    Engine looks like a big headache..

  • @DaleMinar
    @DaleMinar Před měsícem +1

    There is no substitute for displacement.

  • @PapioRed
    @PapioRed Před 13 dny +1

    Thank you for this video, what an absolute disaster from a design point of view.

  • @jordank8402
    @jordank8402 Před 2 měsíci +1

    Deep dive but no output information? Come on buddy, throw us a bone on numbers, including towing capacity (5k). Also, no DOD/AFM for this, and the Buick model is the Enclave.

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 2 měsíci

      The 2.7 that it is heavily based does have afm unfortunately

  • @tacoysandifersr.5385
    @tacoysandifersr.5385 Před 18 dny +1

    Oh boy you give this engine 35,000 miles and watch the problems and going to be spendy

  • @Electricmarquis
    @Electricmarquis Před 2 měsíci

    What was the spec oil weight in this 2.5?

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 2 měsíci

      Full Synthetic 5w20

    • @Electricmarquis
      @Electricmarquis Před 2 měsíci

      @@jmc6000 At least its not a 0w-something. Perhaps for spark plug change leave coolant hoses connected and disconnect TB and turbo ends. Might have enough movement to allow coils to come off. Is the plug change interval same as coolant?

  • @TheConsumersHonestReview
    @TheConsumersHonestReview Před 2 měsíci +3

    This engine is noisy and loud at idle and this is Not Good !! I’m unhappy with the noise

  • @daggumschmoop
    @daggumschmoop Před 3 měsíci

    I haven’t seen anywhere that says the 2.5l has cylinder deactivation. Even the EPA cert application says it doesn’t have cylinder deactivation or AFM.
    If it does have it, I haven’t noticed it like I did on my ‘20 Blazer

    • @jmc6000
      @jmc6000  Před 3 měsíci

      The cylinder head is based off of the same design as the bigger 2.7 which does have cylinder deactivation

    • @AllThingsMech
      @AllThingsMech Před 3 měsíci +2

      @@jmc6000 "based off of" doesn't mean identical though. With the abysmal gas mileage ratings this thing is getting, I'd be very surprised if it actually did have AFM. If it does...GM has a lot of work to do.

  • @CalgaryHyundai13
    @CalgaryHyundai13 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Enclave? haha

  • @mard326
    @mard326 Před 4 dny +1

    junk

  • @dw8555
    @dw8555 Před 3 měsíci +2

    Horrifying!😧