Neil deGrasse Tyson vs Piers Morgan | "Dinosaurs Would STILL Be Here If They Had NASA"
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 01. 2024
- Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson returns to Piers Morgan Uncensored for another fascinating sit-down discussion with Piers Morgan about the benefits and dangers of Artificial Intelligence, social media, the universe and more.
Watch to find out Neil's answers to some of the big questions, such as what planet he'd live on other than Earth, what he thinks the biggest unanswered question about the universe is and how likely he thinks it is that the planet will be hit by an asteroid.
Subscribe to stay up-to-date on all Uncensored content.
Follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on:
Twitter: / piersuncensored
Instagram: / piersmorganuncensored
Facebook: / piersmorganuncensored
TikTok: / piersmorganuncensored
Follow Piers Morgan on:
Twitter: / piersmorgan
Instagram: / piersmorgan
Piers Morgan Uncensored is now available on TalkTV, Fox Nation and Sky News Australia!
#neildegrassetyson #piersmorgan #artificialintelligence #interview #piersmorganuncensored #talktv #science - Zábava
Piers Morgan never passes up an opportunity to boast about how he did the last TV interview with Steven Hawking lol
The funny thing is that Neil deGrasse Tyson is the one who actually had the last interview with Stephen Hawking
lol 😂
Typical narcissist...
Piers Morgan is a religious fanatical Catholic. He does not respect science at all.
If a huge asteroid was headed to Earth, he'd be praying, whilst Nel would solve the issue.
To be fair, Stephen Hawking's totally relevant to the conversation.
Finally a Chill Conversation with Piers Morgan
C 16:55
Piers Morgan doesn't need to shout down the guest when he starts saying something unacceptable to the narrative.
One of Neil's best. His observations about the societal cost of our poor understanding of probability and statistics. Also, how we may or may not be wise enough to ask the right questions to sustain ourselves.
Neil's the type of guy to wake his kids up to tell them he's going to bed
😂
🤣👍
😂c'mon
😂😂😂
Trolls don't even try to make sense any more ...
We need more interviews like this in the world. Learning, laughing- it's awesome.
"Learning"... 🤣 🤣 🤣
It's fun, I wish he was my teacher back in my school days
me too friend.@@delharry4392
i had 6 grams of mushrooms last night, woke up with a masters in Astrophysics .
And a sore bunghole? 😂😂
Impressive!
Tremendous
I figured out quantum physics after a really huge joint just after the Boxing Day tsunami.
Love science and this gentleman is fun to listen to.👍
even piers thinks so too!😂
25:55 THAT slip of the tongue is scaaary
Yikes
So scary wow ignore the clarification and you have a good conspiracy to eradicate humanity by the elites 👍
He's not wrong, but that's not what he would use it for.
Absolutely someone with the intent could design a highly lethal biological weapon in the form of a new disease
I think he meant to say help us develop new drugs for new diseases*
Yeah that’s crazy.
This is not a scientist, this is an activist.
You're qualified to make that assessment? Laff. I will keep listening to Neil!
He is an astrophysicist
I was saddened when he justified the vaccine as safe and effective. Definitely being an activist on that topic.
@@ShawnDrymen lmao yeah bro I'm afraid of vaccines too
Dont become one, put politics aside and just enjoy what they have to offer.
Really enjoyed this, nice one talk TV
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 Neil *deGrasse Tyson discusses his book "Starry Messenger" which emphasizes viewing things from a cosmic perspective, referencing the impact of seeing Earth from the moon.*
01:08 Tyson *highlights how the cosmic perspective can diminish tribalism, emphasizing humanity's shared existence on Earth.*
04:20 Reflecting *on Stephen Hawking's concerns, Tyson discusses the potential risks of advanced artificial intelligence, emphasizing the need for human oversight in critical decisions.*
08:18 Tyson *discusses the limitations of current AI capabilities, expressing skepticism about AI achieving genuine sentience or inventing new knowledge.*
11:18 Tyson *debates the possibility of AI reaching a point where it can think for itself and make autonomous decisions, expressing doubt about the near-term likelihood.*
15:25 Tyson *discusses the erosion of trust in science due to misinformation and the need for improved public understanding of scientific methods and statistics.*
19:55 Tyson *reflects on the unanswered questions of the universe, emphasizing a shift in focus from specific questions to humanity's capacity to answer them collectively.*
20:37 Tyson *discusses humanity's ability to ask the right questions and Elon Musk's views on colonizing other planets.*
21:03 Tyson *shares projections about Earth's population leveling off around 10 billion and discusses Mars as a potential terraforming candidate.*
22:21 Tyson *explains the purpose of colonizing Mars as a backup plan, emphasizing the importance of deflecting asteroids over planetary colonization.*
24:12 Tyson *reflects on humanity's wisdom in managing technological advancements and the need for a cosmic perspective to guide decision-making.*
25:21 Piers *Morgan admires Tyson's tie, leading to a playful exchange about planetary classification and AI's potential benefits despite concerns.*
Made with HARPA AI
I need a summarized navigation to this navigation 😂
So what would Hitler do with AI? What would Hitler do with atomic bomb? So who is scary the creation or the creator and which should you worry about more? So AI may be powerful like you are showing but what if biological life was wiped out tomorrow how would AI take over since they couldn't power up without humans today? So if AI doesn't have consciousness now then does it only activate when commanded for example that summary did you have to tell it what to summarize or did it just pop up as you were watching? So AI would be better soldier then humans because it doesn't process until its asked a specific question and then to carry out a specific job it would need clear instructions which like the automated answering system gives you a "is this correct" so a human would have to ok any action so AI is not the threat but how humans use AI!!
24:00 The crew laughing 😆😆
Neil's so profound... my oh my... so profound... If you don't believe me, ask Neil.
😂
Lol he should go to the lab. Not back to, but finally go to.
@@matttheis3651 😂
THATS IT. HE SELLS HIS PROFOUNDNESS BUT HES MOT PROFOUND.
...NOT PROFOUND...
3:44 he's looking for the word 'primitive' and I'm praying he finds it lol
thats too offensive to say... hes gone to the woke side now
@@tuluksvui747shit up brain-dead moron.
Such a great interview
But does he condemn Hamas?
To be fair it is a moral quandry...
@russelloverend1731 how?
Lmao. I’d love to know how many times he’s said “do you condemn hamas”
😂😂😂
Good one lol
Great talk on both their parts
The joy of knowledge
Star talk is great, but I love these real talk moments with Dr. Tyson ❤
Has he figured out what a female dinosaur is?
Never mind that, does he know about the Jurassic creature who lived constantly with piles! AKA The Mega-saur-ass!
A trans dinosaur is a her-before! 😀
Just what say, "if there were men from Mars and they came here, they wouldn't want to land here, they kill each other etc" Crazy, there is help on the horizon!!
@livingart2576 ngl that was funny!
Oh excellent 😅 👍
Neil left home at 18 and told his father "youre the man of the house now "
Neil has this ability to present empty calorie point like it's a genius idea.
Lol
And people on the internet continue to think they know more than people who are actually educated.
boycott everything israel forever easy
@@GCohen9782 Facts
@@GCohen9782 You being a good example of that point. You don't think that AI would _ever_ learn how to forge a human signature in order to execute a kill shot?
Also, Snake in DeGrasse Tyson _admits_ that he does not understand human consciousness, right? What if AI comes to an understanding of consciousness _before_ humans do?
Fellating you heroes doesn't get you anything more than a mess on your face.
24:48 That's all we need to be better at everything, to know when we say or do wrong and correct it immediately
Neil is the only person in the universe that Piers cannot interrupt
15:30 Neil: "What is true and what is not."
Also Neil: "Men can be Women."
it's 26 minutes interview and half of it about Peirs Morgan's eldest son.
Love you guys together 👏😆 brilliant 🔥
"Dinosaurs would still be here if we had NASA" quote of the year
It's important to clarify the current state of AI. Despite common misconceptions, there is no such thing as self-conscious AI. What we have today are advanced language models and algorithms, not sentient machines. AI functions by processing vast amounts of data to perform tasks, but it does not think or understand like humans do. The idea of AI becoming self-conscious is science fiction and not something we are close to achieving. We currently lack the scientific understanding or technology to create self-aware machines. So, when Piers Morgan expresses fear about AI becoming conscious, it's crucial to remember that we are far from that reality. Today's AI is a powerful tool controlled by humans, without its own consciousness or intentions. Additionally, the term "AI" is a great marketing tool that makes people believe it’s more advanced than it actually is. In reality, AI is a marketing gimmick that doesn't reflect what it truly is. Understanding this helps address any unwarranted fears about the future of AI.
The idea of valuing similarities and allowing for differences is a good one that provides an antithesis to the currently enforced ideology which acts out the opposite. It's a revolutionary idea in some sense, although it was the old status que which had a more universal social cohesion.
I loved this interview, but I'm saddened to read the comments. I don't think we should be casting aside such a brilliant man & mind over a few flaud, yet perfectly human comments, that Neil has made along the way. Over all he's obviously a great man & we definitely need more of those in this era!
A scientist who puts wokeism above science is completely and utterly worthless.
I don't dislike him for his views on gender or whatever. As an engineer in aerospace, I dislike him because he is condescending, speaks with authority on things outside of his sphere of knowledge, and has been incredibly wrong on several topics. It's hard to take him seriously.
@@Welcome2TheInternet Fair point. I was generalising re the comments made about Neil's political statements, for which I disagree with him on many, btw.
He is so up his own backside, that's the problem for me
yep
Great interview.
Nice interview, i love it, thanks Piercd
This man lost all credibility along time ago for someone who thinks hes so smart to say woman and men should be allowed to compete against eachother in sport was crazy
He's no biologist, apparently.
He’s has no common sense
@@jonahansen I'm no lawyer but I know murder is wrong
Meanwhile of the educated world knew exactly what he meant. Plus there Already several sports in which men and women can compete directly against each other.
@@McKluskie context : It was physical sport.
So now Einstein what did he mean?
And a side note name me a physical sport ANY physical sport the woman's world record is superior to the men's world record? Il wait.
Neil's the type to talk about soup while eating cottage pie.
Which ep is this
I totally want to send Tyson a Pluto pin for that tie.
I like what he says, and then he contradicts himself when asked if a man can become a woman, he stops being a scientist and becomes a woke philosopher.
He explained it somewhere. He's just trying to be nice. Like with many thjngs he doesn't think deeply about the issue,. The problem is that he sounds like he thinks deeply about things, so when he says these things he's likely to influence a lot of people. The things that he can talk in depth about he's figured all out before.
He also uses bad faith arguments.. He loves to say "why do you care?" like this is some gotcha and there is some problem with you. Most arguments for "progressive" issues try to avoid discussion of the truth or the subject at all and just shutdown the other side whenever the other side says something that doesn't gel with their ideology.
Crazy how you take away all the context and act like you know everything just for a few likes on a CZcams post
As I see you are using it, could you please define what "woke" means?
This is the greatest thing I've ever watched.
Probably the most enlightening segment I’ve heard Neil do, and the most reassuring.
At this stage we should be more concerned about other humans than AI.
Bravo sir 🫡
Humans have always been the issue not the tool.
"Guns don't kill people, the person behind the trigger does"
When camping, most campers will tell you it's not the bears you need to be fearful of, it's other human beings...desperation is a vial disease all humans possess.
Wrong
Completely agree
Piers has indeed distinguished himself as an objective journalist. His balanced and critical perspective in interviews and columns showcases his commitment to unbiased reporting, earning him respect in the field. His engagement on social media platforms further enhances his reputation, allowing him to challenge mainstream narratives and connect with a broader audience. This adaptability and continuous growth underscore Piers’ significant role in modern journalism.
Thank you, Piers!
Piers Morgan is the greatest journalist since John Gandhi.
Did chat GPT write that for you 😂 😂 very eloquent
Did you write this Piers? Or A.I. maybe?
@@BriceKrogman Thank you for noticing the eloquence in my writing! It's interesting how advancements in AI have led some to assume that well-crafted language must be the work of a bot. However, eloquence in writing isn't exclusive to AI; it's a skill that many people cultivate through practice and a love for language. Your comment raises a curious point about our perceptions of language skills in the digital age. It's a reminder that while AI like ChatGPT can produce articulate content, human beings are equally capable of expressing themselves elegantly. The ability to write well is a reflection of one's dedication to language, not necessarily a reliance on technology.
Do you often find it challenging to distinguish between AI and human writing?
Do you write at all? :)
Was this written by Piers Morgan or someone who is f**king him - either way f**k off.
Make more interviews I like your chats. Two intelligent men🙂
Great interview
They have great chemistry for two people who have very different opposing views
I attribute that to Neil. Also, piers must have had a good nights rest. Only one glaring time where he interrupted.
Neil de Grasse is a great and thinking scientist. I'm a fan, Mr Tyson!
Love NDT, made watching Piers Morgan tolerable for 20minutes , that is an achievement!
Love that interview
Mr Tyson, You makes so much sense, you explain things so well..
ask him why the lab leak was called a deluded theory yet they knew all along it was the most likely
Yes, Neil is an astrophysicist BUT I liked him better when he stuck to that, when he starts getting into politics and the woke stuff he loses me.
It just boils down to AI being in control of deadly things lol. AI gathering info on a device can't shoot or poison anything but a person's mind. I suppose if it made people eliminate themselves, only the weak minded would be removed?
He's no biologist, apparently.
He has become a walking joke.
It's amazing that people who think they are so smart are dumb as a rock! Neil is one of them.
@@Readabookfoofoo that's exactly what people wish I was & I pretend to be most of the time. It's not really worth it though. & Neither is anybody else. Hopefully they give me money to save lives, we will see.
“We came to explore the moon and what we discovered was the Earth”
-William Anders, Apollo 8
@ 14:00 greatest quote I've heard in a while
Great interview! Thank you.
Neil is the perfect example of book smart not actually smart.
笑
I’m sure he’s extremely concerned with your judgment of his intelligence. lol.
Context? Because this one comment makes you look like the one uneducated
Either way he's still far more intelligent than you & yours
ah yes davidmcadoo
It is beautiful to think globally instead of individual
We all need more Neil deGrasse Tyson and less politics
The fact that he can casually say "15 of my books" and it's not an exaggeration is hilarious to me!
He's the only one who has read them
何？Great
I'm betting he had a ghostwriter
😄@@michaelc3977
@@michaelc3977most of them are bestsellers, and I have read two of them and I am in France.
Barf
Me me me me
Hey Meeeeee
"Im smart I know stuffffff"
"Back to me"
It's legit called interviewing Neil deGrasse Tyson. Who would you wish answer these questions? Piers maybe?
@@j0rgos971 yes
Don't be jealous no one cares what you think.
Literally. His worst is on Joe Rogan, constantly interrupting and talking over
Outstanding interview.
God , I love neil. To be both smart, wise, and hilarious is rare. What a guy
This man doesn’t believe in aliens . He’s done
I love and respect Neil, but he's in denial.
He is smart enough to put feelings aside and make an educated guess. I don't believe in ET anymore than I believe in a GOD.
Exactly
He has said in prior interviews that he does believe there is life in the universe.
Oh come on. Neil believes in aliens since he’s been writing his first books. He just doesn’t believe those UFOs spotted on earth are of alien origins or those charlatans showing “alien” bodies. He believes, in fact he’s convinced, there are alien lives in other parts of the universe, but the probability that they are now visiting us is extremely low.
Terminator may be the most important movie ever made.
lol I just wrote the same thing. Skynet doesnt seem like a movie anymore lol
Hardly its stupid as hell. Obviously the method of attack is biological and requires nothing what so ever from any defensive networks. Just a bio printer and a few or more willing actors
Excellent guest.
Finally a decent interview from NdGT
Neil Disgrace Tyson "Pear Shaped" lmfao
It’s time for Neil to come out as trans.
So you feel trans huh
Thanks for teaching us about space and physics in a fantastic way for the curious layman.
Neil, you are amazing! Thank you for your perspective!
0:00
"Well, I'm delun zem joy now by Neil."
-Pierce Morgan
No one has ever said it better.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I can't unhear it now 💀
this guy just talks to him self in his own mind and gets him self all riled up
9:45 “I didn’t name anyone for obvious reasons. However that person happens to be the director of a very famous movie franchise named Star Wars” 😂
Most of you just want someone to agree with you. As soon as they don’t they are “stupid” or “should stay in their lane” but when Elon musk offers a halfwitted opinion that leans to the right, “HE’S A GENIUS”
maybe?
What a beautiful talk . Salute
Two great man in their profession
lol that's a good one man. hahaha
Two hacks.
Highly recommend his newest book. Really does a fantastic job in framing things in a new and progressive way. 10/10
The Name of the person you couldn't remember Sir Tyson is Archidamus III, king of Sparta and it is said when he first saw a projectile hurled by a Balista, he cried out in anguish: oh Hercules, "the Valor of men is lost." and you sir mention this in Episode 10 of the great documentary series: Cosmos, Possible Worlds. I've left this comment as if you sir are going to see it or have the time to read comments!😅
@12:48 - Can't believe I actually agree with Piers over Neil. AI will definitely be able to create new ideas on it's own. Actually, ChatGPT can already do it. It's why alot of AI experts can't explain how it learns so fast and able to problem-solve so efficiently. It's not just copy-pasting ideas, It's problem solving based on new input and coming up with new creative solutions
Regarding AI learning beyond the internet... right now, the public interfaces for AI are _reactive_ in the sense that they only activate as a reaction to human input. You type a prompt, and AI responds. But once we allow AI to be PROactive, and then place that proactive AI into a shell (robot or vehicle or whatever) that has sensors for observing its surroundings, that's when I think we'll be straddling that point of no return.
@@user-yr2is7lc7g (I'm responding to the Google Translation of your post: "This is not possible at all... Machines do not have a soul and will never have it... I can liken all human inventions (to an image) of God’s creation and they cannot reach their reality... The image does not equal the reality!!!!!")
I didn't say anything about machines having a soul. I fully agree that they don't, and I don't believe they ever will or can have one. What I said was that once an AI algorithm is allowed to _initiate_ its actions, and allowed to receive and parse data about its surrounding environment from sensors it has access to, then that will be a point of no return.
Yes, the scary part is unlike us Ai will have telescopic, microscopic full electromagnetic spectrum vision. NDT has limited expertise when it comes to Ai.
You two would be a great podcast or mainstream show
Now THAT is a brilliant argument by Neil: The ability to create. Amazing.
Great interview Piers, well done. NDT is sooo good
Neil did not understand the question about AI no matter how many times Piers explained it to him although I’m still listening.
He’s stuck on the thought that AI can’t deal with information that humans know but have not given to AI. Yes right now AI can’t travel to the beach to see a new beach shell. AI will have access to Google Earth, video, the internet etc. In the future AI will have instantaneous access to everything.
With all the respect, the question itself is nonesense. AI can have access to all the information in the world, it still does not have the ability to interact with the world in ways it is not programmed to do. No matter what you do, AI is a computer program that answers queries and question translating them into some mathematical commutation and solving them. It can then return an answer in a way that you programmed it to do. So the question of self-consciousness or self-engineering is a hallucination. Steven Hawkins was brilliant but he didn't know much about computers and didn't need to.
A good point they made was that AI can be created by humans purposely for malicious reasons, that is indeed an issue and we already seeing it being used on propoganda bots, deep fakes etc.
Even now AI does more than you say it does. In future it will be able to self update, self improve, make discoveries and more and even have a physical presence. It can have no precise location sort of like be present in the cloud and order robots and other entities to move around, interact and do what it orders. You make it sound like a mere calculator or a device that can only do what humans program it to do. The future will be far different. @@alexmost166
@@alexmost166what was it with that google AI engineer who was fired for claiming the the program he was working on became sentient?
@@georgemala4046 just wanted attention
@@alexmost166 It’s not nonsense. Humans are not as special as we would like to think. We are also programmed to receive information through our senses such as eyes ears senses and react to it. We are changed and improved through evolution and by our programming. AI will change and improve enormously eventually by itself and much faster. It may evolve and replace us.
Neil loves him some Neil
I just love this guy.....of course it's not..
Damn that conversation was chill personified. Almost weird how pleasant it was.
"politics looks so pathetic" hit too hard...
Edit: Neil's tie is dope...
Without a shadow of a doubt, one of my favourite people in the world.
lol
Good to see you in the comments Neil
Really? How sad.
He's no Carl Sagan.
I don't agree with everything Neil says but as an inspiration for children to get into Science (especially American children)... he is THE man.
ty
I’m just going listen to Carl Sagan from now on because a woke mind is completely destroyed absolutely 💯
You'd rather someone asleep?
I think Sagan was quite liberal too.
There’s liberal and then there’s woke liberal.
@@cherylM.905 Well... one inevitably leads to the other.
@@cherylM.905Nah you’re just too thick
I think that Neil needs to get some very big recognition while we still have him. Make Science Great Again 😎
Neil is such a joyful person
8:30 - Heh, I remember R:BASE doing this in the 80s. "Application Express" I believe the feature was called.
NGT is a legend in his own lunch time. He's an entertainer, not a serious scientist. We know little about the universe but he makes out there's not much left to know. Tosser !
This man lost all credibility not knowing the difference between a man and a woman
He's been bought by the matrix. Of course media loves to show him. He's black and supports the vaccine AND says woke shit about gender. Yes he's highly intelligent and a real scientist so that makes him very reputable but is still a sellout
You say man and woman but what you really mean is the difference between the male and female sex. Some people might think that sex is determined by the presence or absence of a Y chromosome, but this is not always the case. There are some people who have a Y chromosome but do not develop male characteristics, and some who do not have a Y chromosome but do develop male characteristics1. These are examples of intersex conditions, or differences or disorders of sex development (DSDs), which affect about 1 in 100 people1.
Some people might think that sex is determined by the appearance of the genitals, but this is also not always the case. There are some people who have ambiguous or atypical genitalia, or who have genitalia that do not match their chromosomes or hormones2. These are also examples of intersex conditions, which can have various causes and effects on a person’s health and identity2.
Some people might think that sex is determined by the genes that regulate sexual development, but this is also not always the case. There are many genes involved in the process of sex determination, and some of them can have variations that result in different outcomes1. For example, some people have a condition called androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), which means that their cells do not respond to male hormones, even though they have a Y chromosome1. These people may have female external genitalia, but no uterus or ovaries1.
Some people might think that sex is determined by the cells that make up the body, but this is also not always the case. There are some people who are chimeras, which means that they have cells from two different individuals, usually from twin embryos that fused in the womb2. These people may have cells with different sex chromosomes or different gene variants in different parts of their body2.
As you can see, sex is not a binary concept, but a spectrum that can be influenced by many factors. There is no definitive answer to how many human sexes there are, but there are many ways to describe and understand the diversity of human sex.
I love how all of the TROLLS are so triggered by Neil's staggering intellect while they have the IQ of a dishcloth
No credibility was lost, he acknowledges a psychological condition, and since he isn't a dogmatic religious type he just doesn't really care about the issue. It's only an issue to people who enjoy treating people differently based on what "type" of human they are, instead of just treating everyone as humans.
@@McKluskieand you my friend is exactly what’s wrong with the west
In regards to the AI part I think the whole thing can be boiled down to the fact that he's a scientist so he's much more "curious" about the future of AI than scared because current AI can help humanity make great advancements.
Which I do respect honestly, we need AI to get to the next step of our civilization. Not only that next step is unavoidable but it is also necessary to the dilemmas our species created for itself. And if the answer of the AI is "kill them all" so be it. Although I doubt it'll be its answer, I would lean much more toward artificial evolution to eliminate our weaknesses than the extermination of the rarest occurence in the universe.
25:55
nice Freudian slip there neil.
Dumb meets Dumber...oh 🦌
I had such a crush on Neil when I was a kid. I still have a few of his books. Enjoyed all of them. I see artificial intelligence, and social media, as progressive destroyers of mankind. Nevertheless, much respect for Mr. Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Thanks for having him on, Piers. You’re a phenomenal interviewer.
😂😂😂
You’re so lost.
Artificial intelligence and social media are comparable to the printing press. If artificial intelligence and social media can destroy the world so can the printing press. World war one and two happened without social media and artificial intelligence. Your statement is meaningless.
Why? Man is a activist
@@knockout4121 an
Kneel the Grass Tie Sun
I like the answer he gave about objectively true - then you get people that still believes the Earth is flat