Why is Afghanistan so Strategic?
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 11. 2021
- Why is Afghanistan so strategically important? What are the reasons of its centrality of Asia's power balance? This video will analyze Afghanistan strategic environment and the factors affecting Asia's biggest players into securing their political and security influence over the Kabul.
In the last two centuries Afghanistan has been at center of global powers competition, first with the British , then the Soviet and finally with the US. But why is the South Asian country so important in the global geopolitics game? This video will try to address the reasons of why Afghanistan is so relevant to the strategic balance in Asia, especially for three of its major regional powers: China , India and Russia .
Table of Content:
00:10 America's war in Afghanistan
01:50 Afghanistan's Strategic Environment
04:41 Pakistan Strategic Interests in Afghanistan
06:35 China's Strategic Interests in Afghanistan
07:31 Russia Security Umbrella in Central Asia
08:50 India's strategic loss in Afghanistan
11:02 Afghanistan's role in the spread of terrorists groups
11:46 Terror attacks in China
13:19 Afghanistan's role in China and Russia internal security
14:08 Russia's security interests in Afghanistan
16:08 Afghanistan's role in the energetic security of Central Asia
▀▀▀
If you liked this video, please consider subscribing and supporting the channel growth!
/ @kamome163
Follow me on Instagram and Twitter!
🎙Narration by Jasper! DM him on Discord (Jasper'sVoice2734) and follow his great CZcams channel too!( / @dayfallva9303 )
Music: Magnetic by CO.AG
Incredible video, this channel is criminally under-subscribed!
Thank you so much!
Forreal!
It just takes time, I stumbled upon it after watching caspian report. I agree with you channel is really good.
People seam to find it hard to press that Like or Subscribe button
He just started. Not undersubbed Just takes more than a few months to grow lol
One of the problems facing Afghanistan is that the people only use one name. A related problem is that over 75 percent of the men are named Abdullah. So when someone walks into a room asks “who’s in charge here” a bunch of people stand up and a fight ensues. It has been like this for centuries.
I'm Afghan and there's a lot of people named Mohammed too, my uncle and my grandpa are named Mohammed or have Mohammed in their name
@@meatiest1989 Yeah if you don’t have a last name that must make family gatherings pretty confusing :)
@@dlewis8405 I have a last name lol
@@meatiest1989 I married into a family with two Patricios, two Sonias, and a Patricia. Out of seven people. Confusion reigns :)
We don’t have last names in Ethiopia either but it’s not a problem.
Good shit. I remember watching your first video and being surprised that you only had two videos at the time due to the quality. I had hoped on watching a whole library.
Thank you so much for the supportive comment! Much needed and appreciated.
I’m working to get more videos out faster, hopefully one new video every two weeks.
@@Kamome163 Don't over rush. I'll be patient
hope this channel grows
Very insightful! And I appreciate the impartial and objective view!
Amazing production value on this video.
Hope to get better with the next!
Such a great in-depth video. You hit up a lot of the most important geopolitical points for that area and all the competing interest
Great video and very unbiased approach towards subject and recent situation.
That was a very informative video on the strategic position of Afghanistan. Thanks for the great effort.
Thank you so much, Christopher!
Great content
Great video! Time to binge watch the rest.
Amazing content!
This is such an informative channel. The quality of content easily overtakes several channels that have hundreds of thousands of subscribers.
Thank you for this. Wish you all the success.
Thank you so much Edward!! Likewise!
This channel is under appreciated :)
Peter, at least I have a great community! 🙌
great video, thanks
to the point ...great job mate
This is a good vid. More straight forward than others on this topic
Yesssssss a new video!!! Yo Kamome please continue to upload quality videos and i hope you are a quality over quantity kind of person
Thunder Storm, Thanks for the cheer, I really needed it!
Absolutely, this channel is and will be based on quality. Period. You just have to bear with me for my lengthy sometimes geological time it takes me to upload new videos though🙇♂️
High quality content!
It's well thought in details. quality quality quality I love it and thanks...
Found a new CZcams gem thanks for the knowledge and detailing.
Great stuff!
great video!
This channel is hidden gem, keep it up!
Excellent content
Great stuff - amazing maps
Nice video! It should have more views than few thousands.
Underrated channel
“When history is written, it will be stated that the ISI defeated the Soviet Union in Afghanistan with the help of America"
"Then there will be another sentence. The ISI, with the help of America, defeated America"
- Lieutenant General Gul
A soothing and calm presentation. I enjoyed it. Facts were presented impartially and clearly.
A refreshing difference from mainstream media.
Really? I felt the information about AFG itself, not the surrounding countries, was the same as what mainstream media talks about. All I heard was Islamic terrorism, terrorism, and more terrorism, not at all explaining why the US and NATO was in AFG for the last 20 years even though Osama bin Laden had been killed for quite some time (in Pakistan), etc. Personally, I did not learn anything new about AFG here...
You should have as great deal more subscribers. You videos are very well done.
a master piece
Another great video! Can’t wait to watch more when they come out! Can you do one on Caucasus tensions? Armenia/Azerbaijan. Georgia/Russia. Georgia/Armenia.
Thank you so much! That’s a great (and quite tricky) topic, definitely worth looking into!
You are realy good.
An excellent overview, with two exceptions you left out the interests of Iran and the west in Afghanistan going forward.
Bingo!
Soon, will hit 10k sub!
🙌 thank you much!
Great video. Could you do one on the kashmir dispute and geopolitical issues pls!
this is great.
The video makes good points about the geopolitical considerations of Afghanistan's neighbours but ignores how the Afghan peoples have a history of wanting to be left alone and and frustrating outsiders. I doubt that Afghanistan offers Pakistan additional strategic depth in a conflict with India. Pakistan's key interest is to deny Indian influence in Afghanistan, particularly with respect to what 'was' a growing, educated middle-class in the cities. Pakistan's strategic interests are served by denying influence to other powers in Afghanistan. Supporting the anarchic and fundamentalist Taliban regimes serves this imperative well.
Oh, how the tables have turned for Pakistan since Afghans are now attacking the border Pakistan shares with them. It seems that Pakistan is currently experiencing what the US felt for 20 years.
Good video, I’m actually reading ‘The Great Game’ by Peter Hopkirk at the moment, fascinating subject.
Commenting after 1 yr if this channel is alive still.Please refresh the series.The content is exceptional and graphics is the best of what I have seen anything before.please refresh it. Geopolitics channel becomes History class if not updated.😊
I’m glad you liked it! Yeah I should definitely remake this video😅
Great Video!
Some of the questions regarding the importance of Afghanistan are:
Why is Afghanistan strategically more important than its neighbors, like Tajikistan, or Turkmenistan?
Why Taliban is able to control the country where British, Russians, US had failed?
What are the lessons learned from history?
What should the future policies on it be?
1. ) Geography. It is mentioned in the video. A lot of land trade can potentially move through the country. One reason China is courting it.
2. ) Afghanistan is tribally diverse and extremely conservative outside of urban centers. Building a functional state is nigh impossible, especially a democracy. The Taliban succeeds because it has the guns, it's willing to use them, it appeals to rural folks who have suffered due to UK, US, and Russia, and it is largely a loosely aligned proto-state maintained by force rather than being an actual functional country.
3. ) Afghanistan has no future and isn't worth dying over. It will continue to be a sandbox for future games and war of other powers for decades to come.
4. ) Keep Afghanistan weak and chaotic so nobody can actually create a foothold in the region.
And with attitudes like this, they still ask: "why do they hate us"?
Good video. But at 6:38, did you really mean to say that India is “China’s main regional partner”? Did you mean rival or adversary?
Also, when discussing energy (as in oil and gas), you keep saying “energetic” (meaning jumping around, hyper) when you mean “energy” or “energy-related” policy
Interesting as always, Afghanistan has resources, unbeatable terrain, and strategic placement for weapons for whoever is occupying at the time, let's see how this country plays its role hereto the current events...
Great video
Would love a video on Portugal
it turns out in the moscow theater crisis of 2002, that the majority of people died because the russian special forces pumped an airborne anesthetic that was based on fentanyl that was presumably suppose to incapacitate the hostage takers but instead ended up killing a huge portion of everyone inside including hostages, damn
😢
One problem with this video is it refers to Afghanistan as south Asian when it’s central Asian country. Even the capital city Kabul is called by afghans the “Paris of Central Asia. So please don’t call it South Asian
You forgot to mention it's massive natural resource deposits.
A major problem is that we Afghans do not recognize our bordor Pakistan, and never will. And so Pakistan has constantly been trying to cause instability in Afghanistan. It's good now that taliban are here, no one can misplace them again.
We will take back our land from Pakistan one day.
I think the idea is to lure China into Afghanistan in order to bog them down but the plan is not working Afghanistan and china are freinds the friendship is growing Afghanistan is not a double dealing two faced corrupt like Pakistan china has realised this so what Pakistan is gonna do is call in America and basically hand them gwarder port basically fucking up the chinese but as soon as america lands in balochistan that's when extremists like ttp will wage war on pak government and attack us forces deployed in balochistan and I bet the chinese will back them trust me the Americans not finnished in that region but they wont win pak is a gonner
Great 👍👌analysis love 💘❤♥from Pakistan 🇵🇰❤
Thank you so much! 😍
@@Kamome163 great thanks 😊
How the tables have turned, 😂
Why did you ignore talking about why Afghanistan was so strategic to the USA?
My bet is still on bro, I wish you the best. Though I liked your original voice better than the presenter you have now, because you can tell he is reading something he didnt write
No way I would forget the first bet on the channel! Be ready to get big bucks😜
I’m so looking forward to cover more topics and to reach more people (hopefully reaching the 100k and the 1M soon) but it feels even better to have people like you on the channel. Thank you for the support!
Did you like more the narration on the South China Sea video or for the other videos? Is there something in particular you noticed or does it just sounds a bit off in general?
@@Kamome163 I guess it is of way higher sound quality, but maybe the animations need to visualize the script a bit more or something, because at some points it feels like he just soullessly reads over it and nothing is happening. Because when you show clips of examples (like in 11:50 and 5:07) it is always more interesting than the part starting at (3:00) where the visuals don´t really correspond with the audio. But overall I would still see it as an improvement in the channels quality. Perhaps you could also visualize the structure of the videos with chapters in the timeline and different subsections of the video. Just keep in mind that this is just really small criticism and other people might not mind at all so take everything I say with a grain of salt and have a great evening!
@@kaulquapil6280 As the voice actor here, you actually raise some good points and ideas for me to improve on. It is true that sometimes I don't convey the right emotion, or don't speak in a way that goes well with the visual. I'll be sure to work with Kamome to make that better though!
@@dayfallva9303 I just want to say that I respect both of you very much for taking criticism to heart and not being offended by it. Your voice itself sounds damn good by the way!
@@kaulquapil6280 Thank you! And absolutely no offense taken, haha. It was a very valid point that you brought up, and actually something I had wanted to improve upon myself, so seeing it mentioned by someone else sort of validated my wish to improve there. I hope you keep sticking around!
Pakistan's interest is also to ensure that Afghan governments do not make any serious attempts to lay claim over large swathes of Pakistani territory. This is a huge part of the puzzle that is rarely addressed, and is often overlook by the often-repeated, and greatly exaggerated "strategic depth" argument. Pakistan has seen Afghanistan as a troublesome neighbor right from the start as Afghanistan's Pashtun-dominated government has had a long history of laying claim to huge parts of Pakistan, and even supported a Pashtun secessionist movement that fizzled out in the 1970s as Pashtuns began to play a more central role in the Pakistani state. Afghanistan was also the only country at the UN that voted against recognition of Pakistan. The last Afghan government's ministers (especially Vice President Saleh) would often make a point of claiming Northwest Pakistan as Afghan territory (even though the Pashtuns there show no real interest in joining Afghanistan, and Afghanistan's non-Pashtun population have shown no interest in absorbing tens of millions of Pashtuns that would in effect give Pashtuns a super-majority in Afghanistan).
Pakistan has no interest in afghanistan other than making them stable and to not allow india to use afghan soil for their proxy war in pakistan. Pakistan has only interest in jammu and kashmir which is a legitimate claim since that region is majority muslim and was robbed of them during partition due to indias dirty politics and a ruler of kashmir at the time that was non muslim and didnt represent the peoples choice. Pashtuns in pakistan are arguably the most patriotic in the country after punjabis, they even defended pakistan against afghanistan during the Bajaur campaign battle launched by afghanistan. And afghanistan shares more commonalities with pakistan than any other country in terms of ethnicity, religion etc
how the tables have turned 😂😂
@@TheHomieNickGurr yes i am pushtun from swabi and i love my country Pakistan . Pakistan zindabad Pakistan paindabad inshallah Pakistan will rise once again with imran khan government
@@dunnoewatzgood I bet you can't even write proper pashto, do not understand pashto history. And have fully accepted Punjab as your king. Wake up bro and start supporting pashtun majority country
Pashtuns these days are not that keen on Pakistan the war on terror did the damage in a few years time pashtuns with the baloch will go their own ways
That spot in central Asia is the crossroads between more countries than any other place. It can literally link you from Siberia to South Africa and from Hong Kong to Paris. They're like the super dense center X point no wonder it's unstable you have all these bigger players mudding about
No need to worry about civilian casualties on those islands.
A target rich environment for anti-radiarion missiles.
They won't last till lunch on the first day.
If you don’t rule your country, someone else will rule it for you - Afghans should take heed
Given the instability today in Afganistan politically, militarily and economically, can the chinese and russians really achieve there goals without the kind of commitment the americans made? Major boots on the ground, economic relieve and support of political bodies etc?
Please also mention whose narrative are tou narrating, and incorporate different narratives to keep things fair
The Carter Speech is eerily similar to the current narrative about Ukraine.
👍😘🇦🇫🇦🇫
At this point, everything is strategic for the sake of thumbnail
What's wrong with utube algorithm?
2:47
India is an ally of Russia, not an adversary or competitor. It was the only non-Warsaw Pact country that supported the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and still buys the bulk of its military equipment from Russia. India does not have an interest in blunting Russian influence in Central Asia, but instead to limit Pakistan's influence and over-land access to it. Otherwise, India actually has little interest or use of Afghanistan. Afghanistan was never a major supplier of anything to India other than for nuts and dried fruits. The touted "historic trade ties" actually used Afghanistan merely as a transit corridor to the much wealthier centers of Bukhara and Samarkand or Persia, rather than Afghanistan itself. And what trade there was actually occurred mostly between Afghanistan and cities which now are in Pakistan (like Peshawar, Rawalpindi, and Lahore) and only to a much lesser extent to cities in modern India like Jalandhar and Delhi (and to an even much lesser extent, Calcutta).
Is Afghanistan a strategic importance or a strategic nightmare?
Strategic but nighmare
You should correct the map of India and Bhutan
Why does this make me want to play Hearts of Iron IV?
That's a great game!
the competitions over the region actually started before the Mongol empire. Westerners always rewriting history
Please use a proper border map of Tibet, which is in reality bigger than the Tibet Autonmous Region (TAR) because China divided Tibet between TAR, Qinghai, and Sichuan
Why drawing Qinghai into the map of Tibet? No Tibetan ruled Qinghai for 500 years. In 1636 Güshi Khan conquered the Kokenuur (Qinghai), and he was enthroned as King of Tibet by the 5th Dalai Lama. Mongol khanate made 5th Dalai Lama the sole ruler of Tibet (TAR). Khoshut Mongol khanate controls the Qinghai until the arrival of Manchu in 1724.
This fool here cracking nonsense.
@@bg24955 Maybe it's related to ethnicity. I don't know Tibet well enough.
have you ever been to any of these countries? subjective bro
arunachal pradesh is not a disputed area...between china With the British exit, China reverted to its expansionist ambitions and claimed Arunachal Pradesh as its territory.
Wasn't British annexed that part from Tibet and added it to British Raj and once British were gone , Tibet becomes part of china then legitimately it should return to china isn't it?? You can't complain about colonisation while carrying out it's legacy, not returning land to rightful owner another victim of colonisation
Permainan perekrutan blogger, 200.000 sampai 400,000 RP dengan gaji yang siap untuk menanggapi
EX!T!NG AND INF0RMAT!VE!!!
You keep calling Afganistan a buffer state for china, when it bearly boarders it. On top of that, china can#t even build a road & rail link though that very slim mountainous boarder, so they tunnel all their trade through 3rd countries.
It's like your confusing Pakistan with Afghanistan.
Russia invaded Afganistan because it wanted to prop up the Afgan comunist party uprising there, like it aided with literally all comunist movments on it's boarders,.
China didn't need Afghanistan to buffer with Russia. Mongolia and the rest of the USSR mostly did that, Afganistan would not add to that buffer one little bit, Pakistan needed it as a buffer from the USSR.
China want's closer links with Afganistan because of all it's rare earth metals. Afghanistan has no historical trade links between the east and west as its landscape and local very hostile population wouldn't allow it, and still wouldn't allow it in modern times.
All your arguments are nonsense.
Well, due to the current Ukraine war, Russian resources will be stretched thin. Economically they have to be dependent on China and India in the future. So, I do not see Russia trying to undermine China and India's interests in the region. Also, Russia has built an oil and gas pipeline directly to China. It desperately wants to reach India now, and India wants to reach Central Asia. India and China, as a civilizational states of 1.4 billion each with rising economies will never become energy independent if they do not secure long term gas and oil deals with Iran and Russia. It is a win win as both Iran and Russian economy will grow tremendously. Going forwards, Russia will want to secure the Artic as more glaciers melt. Iran will want to increase it's influence in the Middle East and possible undo the current nation states of Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Currently, the interests of China and India seem at odds. Not allowing India a space in Afghanistan will help China. India will try to counter this by increasing it's dominance in the Indian Ocean which is a crucial zone for Chinese trade and it's economy. The Europeans and Americans will try to foil any kind of quadrumvirate of Russia, India, China and Iran to take place. Basically, we are back to : THE GREAT GAME.
@11:11, “The main reason US invaded Afghanistan was because of 911.” That statement alone gives away this video’s mission as a pure US propaganda produced by the NED to justify the US waging wars in the region. This video twists and tortures facts to fit the US foreign policy. The CZcamsr of this video even dugout an old, incredulous video of an actor portraying Osama bin Laden residing in front of a cheap Hollywood prop made up to resemble the wall of a cave. The low budget propaganda video gave the gullible American people a visual image of man whom they can focus their anger, hate, and revenge for 911. The Taliban government of Afghanistan and the Afghan people had nothing to do with 911. - all the 911 attackers were Saudi Arabia citizens and Palestinians. Notice this video produced by the NED conspicuously omitted that fact - a deafening silence.
I don't think Palestinians were involved. I thought it was Saudis and Emiratis.
@@khanra ::: nope. All were Saudi and Palestinians.
Yes, noticed that, too, and, especially after watching another one of his videos about China and India, which was much more detailed with way better maps, realized this channel had some sort of connection with the US govt/CIA, etc.
the urumqi demonstrations were terrorist attacks not demonstrations...the latter is peaceful, the former is not
how the tables have turned for Pakistan 😂😂
There is some dishonesty in this video.
The urumchi riots had significantly more han deaths and damage of property.
great video...except for the part about the language used in china and the bullshit about the uighur.
*TIANANMEN SQUARE MASSACRE*
@@pliskinishmael7190 how many died? Go ahead...answer.
Supporting South China Sea Oppressors and false communism. Karl Marx is disappointed 🥱
ok......who did the so called south china sea oppressors oppress, pray tell.
also, you are apparently okay with the global oppressor killing children in their incessant war....just goes to show how brainwashed you are.
@@112313 who is this global oppressor, pray tell my arse. Don't go saying that all that they've done to my countrymen are false and the water canon are fake when there's a footage of it. How brainwashed am I? have I mentioned Uyghur camps? No! 'cause there's little evidence of it and I think THE WEST themselves are making an enemy of China but the fact is that these things of blocking the fishermen out of South China Sea and borderline destroying its natural ecosystem is itself bad for everyone. I can say that you are delusional for defending them and not understanding both sides and just paints everyone who sh8ts on China brainwashed. I have not forgotten what the colonization of past western powers and the evil they have brought upon my country but one thing I can say is that claiming the whole sea RIGHT NOW and blocking out fishermen who depended on that resource is itself BAD! Yes why the hell would I care about the world oppressing itself when I can't even take full action of my daily duties. I do not believe in any political agenda and would only believe on things that are in fact real and has hard evidence backing it up. If I ever believe on political nonsense that attacks people and not understanding, then that would make me as delusional as you. Worthless believer and I can say that China isn't even Communistic but devolve from being it and now is a socialist with capitalism in it. I love Chinese Anime which is Donghua and I can see myself enjoying chinese art more.
My mistake is saying China but what I meant is when I say China, it is the government itself, I have no ill will or r8cists attributes on hating Han Chinese. Anyways, why does China even calls itself Communist, really? I'd say implementing capitalism in their is a traitorous move towards Karl Marx. Damn I even read his Communist Manifesto. China doesn't deserve to call itself communist nor does it have to bend on something they faithfully call themselves to. My brain is frying writing this reply. Hope you understand...
Chopped up and recycled data from at least 2 years ago
Afghanistan is not strategic region. It may be in a central location but is difficult terrain and poor soil makes it mostly useless. It does have large mineral resources but you need a lot of infrastructure which will cost a huge amount of investment and there is no costal port to export it. It is practically impossible to deal with as the Americans and the Russians learnt first hand with the British still having difficulties to understand that. The Iranians and Pakistanis know this and that is why they don't bother with Afghanistan. It's better to stay out of Afghanistan. Pakistan and Iran are far more strategically important.
Pakistan is important coz of balochistan the baloch and Pashtun are coming together to get rid of Pakistan .one advantage of Afghanistan is that it fought America and that impressed the china plus taliban guaranteed that chinese interest or property be protected .where as Pakistan is was and always be a us client state the chinese are not stupid they know that the taliban are reliable
@@shernawabkhan9441 I disagree.
I will add a few things and will keep it short this time. 1) Taleban is created by the CIA with Pakistani help. 2) Soviets were drawn to the Afghanistan war by the CIA. CIA ex-director who oversaw the operation in the 80s has confessed this. In fact, he is proud of his accomplishment. 3) Uyghurs are a Turkic population. 4) China promoted Islamic fundamentalism in Uyghuristan to create a buffer against CIA-controlled Uzbek fundamentalism and also to curb Uyghur nationalism by inventing a reason to oppress them. 5) Afghanistan is important for the United States to divide Asia in two to confine and weaken both China and Russia and also Iran, to meet with India from land and weaken it if possible (if and when China will weaken further). 6) The US, UK, Russia, and China wouldn't want a unified front of Turkic countries in Central Asia to dominate the region. So it is a proxy war for resources (also by securing the oil trade in the Indian Ocean to confine China further). See the ongoing Kazakhstan revolt in this context. Kazakhstan is also at the center of well... Central Asia.
*AND AMERICA JUST GAVE IT AWAY HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!*
It takes more than 2 years to stabilize a country lmao
U used wrong map of India 🇮🇳
Don't forget kashmir not part of india,
jammu and kashmir not part of india.
@@TheHomieNickGurr i am reiterating " u used wrong map of India 🇮🇳 " ground reality is... a part of kashmir is under the control of india and the rest is occupied by both China and Pakistan
@@raviteja8851 it’s occupied by india and belongs to pakistan or deserves independence from both. India knew if referendum happened in 1947 then they will say goodbye to Jammu and Kashmir 😆
Your commentary is average at best, there's no depth. Very colorless analysis. Every country has foreign policy & security interests, but there are the more naughty ones & the less naughty ones. The ones with an aggressive border policy, have authoritarian & unstable Governments, almost always fall in the Naughty category. Communist authoritarian China, Islamic Republic of Pakistan & Russia (under an almost Dictator Putin), obviously push the envelope on these kind of border integrity matters. You calling out India having "insecurities" on Afghanistan is not a mature take on India's policy interests. Wrong choice of words. India has all along been playing defense with the very-naughty Pakistan & China. Pakistan literally gobbled up Afghanistan territory in 1947, as it smartly took over the British-decided Durand line (carved out in 1893 on a 100-years agreement) leaving the Afghans high & dry. Afghans hate Pakistanis for their duplicity & conniving radicalizing tactics that have utterly destroyed Afghanistan. If anyone is insecure, its Pakistan because they know they are playing a dirty game of state-sponsored terrorism & every sane person hates them. You also did not cover how Pakistan is selling out to China, by giving them operational control of the crucial Gwadar port, mining rights in Baluchistan, getting cheap Chinese Arms & so on. Pakistan is literally the reason & chief source for all the trouble in Afghanistan.
Pakistan did not absorb an inch of Afghan territory in 1947, but inherited territories ruled by the British Raj. Afghanistan unilaterally disputes the validity of the border, and has even supported secessionist movements in Pakistan that eventually fizzled out. They even launched a border campaign in the 1950s to seize Pakistani territory. The Afghans were under a misperception that Pakistan's Pashtuns for some reason were loyal to Afghanistan, even though they had not been Afghan subjects in over 100 years by that point. In fact, Pashtun nationalists in 1947 advocated union with India, not Afghanistan. Afghanistan for quite a long time has advocated seizing upwards of 50% of Pakistani territory, so it is no great mystery why Pakistan's interest is in keeping Afghanistan too weak to ever cause such a problem from ever possibly turning into reality.
What a stupid comment. Pakistan inherited the land that is kpk that is claimed by afghans. The people in that land chose pakistan over afghanistan they even defended pakistan when afghanistan launched an attack called the bajaur campaign, prior to this attack the relations between the countries were normal but it was afghanistan that caused this enmity relationship. And to put more salt in the wound, it was pashtuns from kpk and pashtuns from the FATA (federal administered tribal areas, now kpk) that defended pakistan against the afghans lol, so your point is ridiculous. How can you call out pakistan for state sponsering terrorism when india has been using afghan soil to fund and arm militant organisations like the BLA that are designated a terrorist group by the UK, USA and european union. And not to mention the occupation of jammu and kashmir by india that was robbed by indias dirty politics during partition. In reality pakistan have 2 dirty countries on their borders that have provoked them first: indias occupation of jammu and kashmir 1947 and afghanistans blatant attempt of causing war and invading pakistan in the Bajaur campaign.
Pakistan forgets that it forced itself on Baluchistan in 1947..the Baloch have always been treated badly by the Pakistani gov from 1947, they want the land but the ppl there live a miserable life . Pakistan cares only abt Punjab ..so no wonder they hate the Government
US they loose again in war
Afghanistan will not be an strategic depth to Pakistan. Pakistan literally offered up the Taliban on a platter during the 2001 nato invasion. Tal.ban won’t make the same mistake
Your video demonstrates that while you probably are quite knowledgeable about China and India, and possibly Russia, you unfortunately have superficial knowledge about Afghanistan. At the very least, one would expect a detailed video about Afghanistan not to say "Afghani people." It is Afghan people, as Afghani = the money/currency of Afghanistan.
Hey Jasmine! Thank you for the feedback. That’s a good point and thank you for raising that up. It was quite thought to find someone knowledgeable about Afghanistan to proofread the script and therefore the error. Would you be interested in proofreading a future video on Afghanistan/South Asia?
@@Kamome163 Yes, I would be happy to help out, and thank you for being open to feedback.
@@yasminea7149 absolutely, I’m glad that you viewer keep me accountable for what I say in the videos. Thanks! If you want drop me an email at: sekishouproduction@gmail.com
Yeah I am Afghan this video is so wrong. Afghanistan was super against Pakistan (Until 1992 when Islamist puppets got power)
american propaganda
Pakistan Zindabad ❤
you're name is literally butt lmfao
Propaganda video
It's not. The world gets along fine without it.
Lots of wrong info there mate - just lost respect for your channel after being a regular watcher for ages. Pakistan acquired nuclear weapons from China with the USA’s blessings before India considered nuclear armaments thereby forcing India to go nuclear too. To this day, Pakistan also rapes/forcibly converts girls from minority communities to Islam. Also, the ‘war’ with India was Bangladesh’s war for independence from Pakistani dictatorship. India freed Bangladesh as any Bangladeshi will tell you - despite staunch resistance from France, the UK & the US (F-UK-US). Pakistan started off life with billions of dollars of free cash in Indian currency - back then the Indian Rupee was backed by gold and was worth nearly $2 and Pakistan also got additional aid from oil rich nations + the USA. Besides the Taliban, Pakistan supports Al Qaida and many other extremist organisations - remember how the USA ‘finally discovered’ Bin Laden in Pakistan? And then - India has been fostering cultural ties with Central Asia with Russia’s blessings because China and Russia have border disputes, and because Russia and India have been strategic partners from the 1950s when France, the UK & the US (F-UK-US) tried to militarily/economically screw India. I would expect a channel like yours to do proper research and not spew garbage.
Deeply incorrect. nonsense. Neither Pakistan nor China introduced nuclear weapons to South Asia. India tested nuclear weapons in 1974, well before Pakistan's nuclear programme ever started. The US also did not give its blessings to Pakistan, and at best, turned the other way. In the 1990s, the US even sanctioned Pakistan for its nuclear weapons.
As for minority rights, read any news source. India's moral high ground on that issue is exaggerated, and rapidly deteriorating given the way that the Hindu nationalist government has been treating Muslims, and now increasingly, Christians.
Lmao the war in bangladesh for independence where the biharis in bangladesh were killed off, at least 200k of them by the bengalis cos of ethno nationalism. Pakistan has the right to intervene at the time to de escalate the riots that were happening at the time in the east even though bengalis were mistreated at the time nobody denies, doesnt mean bengalis were in the right killing off anybody who didnt speak their mother tongue and anybody who was in support of pakistan. Pakistan doesnt support the taliban, the people of pakistan do especially in the western part. The pashtuns of pakistan are sympathetic to the pashtuns of afghanistan allowing the talibans to seek refuge across the border and talibans are dressed like civillians they speak same language as pakistanis and not to mention the border in which the afghans dont recognise. It was pakistan who fenced the border since afghanistan didnt want to cooperate in doing so. So what if they discovered bin laden in pakistan, bin laden was invited by the usa for their war against communism during the cold war they must have forgotten to take him with them after the cold war lmao. And mistakes among the agencies can happen after all, look at how the most powerful countries secret agency didnt see synchronised plane hijacks coming that flew in their buildings, nobody is infallible mistakes happen.
Really good. Do partnerships so the channel can grow because the content is really good.
F.OPE thanks for the kind comment! Do you have any partnership suggestions?
@@Kamome163 The ones that come to mind are Caspian Report and Good Times Bad Times, but (and I don't know how viable that is) maybe a collaboration with Asianometry would be possible? They are a great channel covering Asian topics from a more economic perspective but also have covered history, demographics and others.
@@FOLIPE Thank you for replying, F. OPE. Those are heavyweights on CZcams! I must say I personally find them fascinating in how they cover economic, politics and cultural topics, each in their own personal way. I think they are too big to even bother but hey, I can give it a try! Perhaps sending an email could do the job?
@@Kamome163 They are and sure it isn't certain they'll agree to it, but I guess a lot will depend on how they see your videos and other credentials. Alternatively, you could wait a little until your channel grows more, or, if you are planing content about other regions of the world you may look into channels like Into Europe or New Africa. Now, as unlikely as the may be (which I don't honestly) to collaborate with you, sending an email is free.
@@FOLIPE That's true, I guess letting the channel grow up a bit more, and developing a wider portfolio of videos is not a bad idea. As you said sending an email is true so why not! 🙌 As you mentioned, I think it might be worth looking into different topics and geographical areas.