1066Rider he's back riding and even has another Daytona for the track. He's become a big youtube celebrity approaching half a million subscribers. Amazing what poor riding and almost killing your self will do for your youtube channel.
I wish they had actually made it look like a Moto2 bike. How hard would that have been? Integrate some headlights into the “bubble” fairing, add the obligatory turn signal stalks, and be done. As it is, this feels like a throwback in the sense that the RSV4 does. That is not to say either isn’t a fantastic bike, but sex appeal does matter. Regardless of any of that, I’d definitely buy this if money was no object. As it is, I’d be more interested in the rumoured updated Street Triple (with similar engine tweaks). More practical for road use, cheaper and roughly on par for looks (and I dislike the bug eyes).
It's a no from me, chief. If they had done a better job with the looks and offered it as a regular production model, then it would make sense to consider it. They are already all sold out probably, but at that price range there are so many better looking and more powerful options.
Looks beautiful! And I'm sure it will perform! Not many manufacturers have made a bike which can so easily switch between road and track (bmw, ducati) so it'll have to be pretty techy to be 'practicable' on the road too.... since he's saying it so track focused.
A bit of a vanity piece (price!!) but beautiful nonetheless. I will say now that own a 2018 Street Triple 765 R that it really is, in my 20 plus year of riding, the best motor/chassis combo I’ve ever encountered. It does everything extremely well. I have very little track experience but no doubt, in the right hands, this thing would be a weapon and if kept in nice condition, will most likely hold its value fairly well. Look forward to Triumph Of Seattle getting their hands on one so I can see it in the flesh! Now C’mon Triumph, lets see a liter bike based on the 1050 Speed Triple motor!! That would get my attention even more.
I think it looks fine. I particularly like the Arrow pipe and cat cowling; it tidys up the bottom of the bike quite nicely. I suppose £15,765 is not too bad either for a homologation special. 128 bhp, though? Didn't the GSX-R 750 make more than that?
Beg to differ ... Not much different especially with that fairing that is too much forward and the ugly headlights screaming 2009 .. It doesn't look 2019 for some reason.
We can assume there will be future releases beyond the Moto2 homage limited edition. If it is as good as they claim, there will be huge demand for this.
Every other manufacturer is concentrating on 1000cc (or greater) superbike. I'm glad someone is still building bikes us mere mortals may be able to ride
Yeah and adding power reduction modes making smaller cc bikes like this pointless.. it’s just cost prohibitive to make a crazy lightbike with decent power upgrades ... Solution: just hand them the same dated product
That would be great, however it seems to be competitive in WSB and road racing they need to be 4 cylinder for some performance reasons I don't quite understand. Triumph do not seem to want to make a 4 cylinder. So I guess "no"
@@naisingjamatia8700 Haha ! I was thinking a 1000cc superbike capable of WSB , Isle of Man TT and other road races. I wasn't thinking of a MONSTER cruiser bike :) (I'd love a go on a Rocket, doubt I'll ever own one)
@@AndreasBrOlesen It's close, but no as close. RS is agressive and all, but stripping this Daytona and turning it into streetfighter would be more radical in my opinion.
I was at a dealership today.. the were promised 1! I soooo wanna get one.. Daytonas have always bin the best lookin bile out there i think.. but as a first bike😂 I am older and responsible.. but i wonder if its any good to just drive around on.. cant decide. The one at the store aint taken yet🤔 Wonder what the price will be?
Hey the Daytona 675R was my first bike... had absolute blast with it! Until some old ass lady pulled out in front of me failing to yield the right of way and I wrecked it. Her insurance paid for everything of course, but yeah this new one will be even better! I just gotta watch out for old drivers
a9653192 haha oh man.. i wanna get one so bad. But the total cost every month is doubled what i get to pay for a street triple. But this one is so sexy
Lindilicious I know what you mean by the price. Hell the same price can get you a decent BMW S1000RR, but since I’ve owned a Daytona 675R in the past. I just had to get this limited edition one! I placed a deposit at a local dealer and I’m 3rd in line... I’m hoping the dealership get at least 5!! I like the narrowness of the Daytona... feels like a 250 punches like a 750... it’s just an amazing middleweight bike for sure.
Most comments are about the design. The previous gen was a good looking bike. Why change? You should be judging by how it rides and delivers power rather than looks. There is this tiny car manufacturer called Porsche who haven't changed their design in forever.
@@authenticmax6350 You're right, design does matter if it was meant to be a new bike. This is a special edition Daytona with a Moto2 engine that cost them a lot of money to develop.
Moto2 is more about the Kalex chassis than whatever spec engine they are forced to use. Nobody talks about Triumph at a Moto GP event. Maybe they could form a team.This guy talks like his chassis can run with Kalex.
My bog standard Speed Twin makes my trousers go brown and smelly every time I ride it. It's pretty easy to ride, it just has so much tempting power. Maybe I should have realised my limitations as a newbie and got an RE Interceptor ! I am hoping I will grow into the Speed Twins abilities, so no need for an "R" version for me just yet :)
@@karlosh2422 I know I've tested one and loved it. The only think I didn't like was the look of the front forks and the rear shock. It would look a lot better with thruxton r suspension on. But I love that engine it dominates the whole bike.
@@harrymc9263 I can see why some riders will want a Speed Twin R, I personally just don't need that yet, I am not good enough ! On the looks, they should have had an all brushed stainless steel exhaust. Black sections look silly to me, but I guess Triumph needed an extra reason to sell the vance and hines :) Otherwise I love my Speed Twin.
@@karlosh2422 totally agree with that. Vance & Hines look much better but don't sound significantly different. Just a way of getting money out of people
They have a limited budget, redesigns cost a fortune, tooling costs a fortune, all the electronics, abs, TC, the moto2 engines, everything, if they redesigned the bodywork too, it's be double the money.
So the engine in this is Euro 4. I can't believe they haven't got a Euro 5 engine for the Street or Speed Triple. Surely one of them would fit. Triumph have been missing a production faired sports bike for a while.
For this price it includes a shit piece of meccano 0:33 to steady the radiator, and worse still, they have fastened it to the worse possible place using one of the engine-case cover bolts.
Engine is ideal for sport street riding. Bring back the 750's people - they are very capable and fun and you don't need all the nanny electronics on them either. This - to little and f- Euro 5 bureaucrat B.S.
the thing that annoys me is thet all that ABS, TC, Euro emissions etc etc etc costs the manufacturers a fortune to comply with, so small companies just can't compete and then go under, I like what CCM are doing with the spitfire, they make just change 1 thing on their bikes just before the number gets over the EU limit for "limited production" models, which means they dont have to meet regulations, then they rename it and rerelease, hence why their are 5 or 6 CCM Spitfire varients... Everytime they reach the limit, it gets a new seat design and a rename ;)
They'll make it a production model of this later, they always do. Which is why I don't get why they made it look virtually identical to the 675. If they release the production bike and it looks updated, people who bought this will feel cheated. If they don't, nobody will buy it. They've screwed themselves with this one.
Oh my the engine is amazing but the body work is same same. That's dissapointing the exhaust looks like its off a Norton commando... Underslung pipe and a moto 2 upper fairing delete that ugly centre light would be nice Still 1 of the best bikes in the triumph collection but could of done better and for 30 K Aud for a rehash chassis basically no thx..
the original 2006 Daytona 675 was such a gorgeous bike, that any revision that came after it was just a downgrade. If you lined this new bike up alongside the original, pretty much any layperson would say that the original 2006 bike is the newer one, do doubt... It's not bad, it;s just nothing special anymore, maybe even a bit boring.
I dont know about u but the style of this bikes tail gives away the fact thats its newer... the rest still looks a bit outdated... i thought they would make a new bike entirely but ut seems they just upgraded the older one with the new engine and some features, made it a limited production bike and called it a day... kinda disappointing tbh
I have a number 42 of 47 Danny eslick 675r, if anyone is willing to trade there new 765r please let me know. That will be the only way I will let it go . The bikes are truly amazing and reading all the comments about it's not a 1000cc or it looks old just don't appreciate it for what it is . If it looks so bad then why every time I take it somewhere it's surrounded by people praising it .
So basically, if you only use on the road, it's not worth it. Don't need the multiple function screen, all the different modes etc etc. Then if you want to take it on track, you'll be too worried about damaging it, as it's costly & carbon fibre panels. More expensive to buy, more to insure, wouldn't a Daytona 675 or 675R suit 99% of people better?
The 765 Street Triple isn't making that much more power than the old 675 Street triple either. But, it still feels like a much better and much more powerful bike.
I thought it may have been 130BHP+. The street triple is 123BHP and wasn't the old Daytona about 125BHP. I know it's a limited run but at 16 grand you're into big bike territory where BMW and KTM are kicking out over 160BHP for the same money The Ducati 959 is in this price bracket and they are around the 150BHP.
It seems a lot of this "it isn't putting much more power, but has more displacement" moaning is mainly due to meeting Euro 4 as compared to Euro 3 regs. I don't know what any of the bike manufacturers can do about that, they've all had to up displacement and reduce fuel consumption and emissions to balance competing objectives.
Of course 'limited edition!' (yay), but it's a bit hard to see the value in this once you get past that. The chassis and brake setup is 100% what you get in a Street Triple RS, with slightly different (not necessarily much better) forks. Even the pegs are pretty much in the same position. Exhaust sounds 'meh' at best (of course it would with that huge cat box hanging below). It has a fairing, but with an older design. So if you must have a track bike with clip-ons, why not just pick up an older Daytona (R)? And if clip-ons don't matter, a second-hand 765 RS or R. Unless it's the extra power you are after, but then you might as well go all the way and surely a new S1000RR (which can't be much more expensive) then dumps all over this?
Biased opinion here (since its my profile pic) - find a new "in box" old model MV F3 800 have a lighter bike with more power (from the specs I have seen anyway not sure if they were mock specs or not) and still all the fancy stuff. Saved me 7k over the price of this "special edition"
i think it looks sick you can’t win with people either they update it and it looks shit or they keep the older model looks with a spin and it’s still shit.
The performance of the engine is very underwhelming, sound to be the ordinary 765 engine from the street triple with different gearbox cogs.... Shit Triumph, don't go overdoing it with the effort. It's basically the 675 Daytona R with the 765 engine and Carbon Fibre fairings to dress it up as something more special than it is.
Do people in the comments section just love moaning? 🤔 The daytona was never an ugly bike, this ones gonna sound even better and go better! Dont like it?.. dont buy one! simple
It´s not moanig, but after all I just I expected something more different to the old model. The exhaust and the horse power for a price tag like that that, almost 19'000 Swiss Francs, are shouting out loud: "Are you serious?" For half the price or even less I can get an old Daytona. I don´t think I`m so much slower with it on a funny day on a race track.
It’s not a case of moaning, people, including myself, are disappointed that triumph were lazy and are effectively trying to pass off a 12k bike for 16k. I want a new Daytona for 16k, not an old Daytona with a new dash and engine. It’s a marketing rip off
So people can't speak their mind anymore and you expect everyone to participate in a circlejerk ?? The design department kinda got lazy and it shows, period. That doesn't mean that it's not a great bike but when you sell this in 2020 people do expect something special and in the look department the 765 has already lost.
Great motor and potential yet still maintained the old look, looks outdated and like shit. Never been a fan of the body works and wish they would've come out with something fresh, different, and updated.
Agreed.... almost 2020 and manufacturers are still putting halogens on bikes? LEDs are literally a night and day difference when night riding, it's safer! Not to mention they look better as well.
@@mitsuninja Idd, i bought a Z1000SX 2 years ago and that has LEDs stock, as you say it is a HUGE difference over halogens. First time i drove on a smaller road without streetlights with the Daytona i had to have highbeams on all the time to see where the hell i was going, not a hit with the oncoming traffic.
@@Sunedosa my eyes were open when I switched the crap halogens from my s1000r to LEDs and the difference was like going from Super Mario World to Super Mario 64; the jump in visibility was insane! BMW should be ashamed for putting shit lights on that bike and it's a MY17. There really is just no excuse to still use halogens anymore; LEDs are superior in everyway, they last longer and just safer for riders.
@@mitsuninja Idd, for the money they're asking for it there's no excuse tbh. I'd hazard a guess that 95% of the parts would bolt right on a 13 675R, apart from the TFT screen, the engine and the carbon body work wich are basicly carbon versions of the same plastics i have on my 13 non R there's nothing new afaik. It's obvious that they have no intention of prolonging the production beyond the limited edition model, no extra effort has been made. Underwhelmed, even feels low on power imo, should be 140ish as the MV800 and not the same 128hp as the 675 version.
@@Sunedosa definitely a missed opportunity for sure. The new Daytona could've been really special if Triumph actually gave it the love and respect that it deserved.. does this even have a quickshifter? I was kinda doing other stuff while watching this vid so missed it if they did mention that.
Kind of disappointed... It's a "normal" Daytona with a breathed on 765 engine and fancy paint. Not exactly what i'd call a "Moto 2 bike for the road" imo anyway. Good to see the Daytona back tho
This is proof that opinions can be wrong lol. The new Daytona was always going to have a 765 just as the triples have, and this one has been more than "breathed on" plus you forgot to mention all the carbon fibre, and there are the chassis/dimensions changes. The "normal" one if it does turn up (I hope, and think it would be odd not to) will not be as tuned and obviously heavier by a fair bit with less trick parts as standard.
@@MrStr8den The style has definitely been tweaked, and why totally change it? It would not be Triumph Daytona then, and I absolutely love the style. I'd have one in a heartbeat if I could.
Try again...maybe a Sprint GT 1200 ? You would thing they would try to use that 1200cc LUMP in more bikes than one in order to recuperate R&D costs back ASAP. 🙄👎
Yammie noob is going to crash this one too.
2 Quick 2 Come lmao it’s funny because he bought another for the track only
@@NudaMan lol
Same thoughts. Hahaha
That fool gained something like 300K youtube followers after the yellow Porsche incident.
1066Rider he's back riding and even has another Daytona for the track. He's become a big youtube celebrity approaching half a million subscribers. Amazing what poor riding and almost killing your self will do for your youtube channel.
I wish they had actually made it look like a Moto2 bike. How hard would that have been? Integrate some headlights into the “bubble” fairing, add the obligatory turn signal stalks, and be done. As it is, this feels like a throwback in the sense that the RSV4 does. That is not to say either isn’t a fantastic bike, but sex appeal does matter.
Regardless of any of that, I’d definitely buy this if money was no object. As it is, I’d be more interested in the rumoured updated Street Triple (with similar engine tweaks). More practical for road use, cheaper and roughly on par for looks (and I dislike the bug eyes).
Good to see Motobob on here again! Good job, buddy!
Shame it already looks ten years old, very dated...
It's a no from me, chief.
If they had done a better job with the looks and offered it as a regular production model, then it would make sense to consider it. They are already all sold out probably, but at that price range there are so many better looking and more powerful options.
Great interview & awesome bike! 😀
Looks beautiful! And I'm sure it will perform! Not many manufacturers have made a bike which can so easily switch between road and track (bmw, ducati) so it'll have to be pretty techy to be 'practicable' on the road too.... since he's saying it so track focused.
This had been a long time in the waiting!!
Why comes the bike not equiped with race fairings from factory?
Looks are too conservative...missed opportunity to create a special looking bike.
A bit of a vanity piece (price!!) but beautiful nonetheless. I will say now that own a 2018 Street Triple 765 R that it really is, in my 20 plus year of riding, the best motor/chassis combo I’ve ever encountered. It does everything extremely well. I have very little track experience but no doubt, in the right hands, this thing would be a weapon and if kept in nice condition, will most likely hold its value fairly well. Look forward to Triumph Of Seattle getting their hands on one so I can see it in the flesh! Now C’mon Triumph, lets see a liter bike based on the 1050 Speed Triple motor!! That would get my attention even more.
So its not euro 5 compliant? Does that mean you cant ride it on the road?
Does it comes with full system arrow or slip on ?
Hey it's Motobob! Awesome!
I think it looks absolutely amazing, it has all of the design elements I love in a sportbike!
Engineering and performance wise I'm sure it's stunning. Looks wise, a 10 year old R6 looks better.
I think it looks fine. I particularly like the Arrow pipe and cat cowling; it tidys up the bottom of the bike quite nicely. I suppose £15,765 is not too bad either for a homologation special. 128 bhp, though? Didn't the GSX-R 750 make more than that?
Yep
Good interview
Look at that beautiful radiator!🙀
fw1421 ...yeah, look how it's held on @ 0:33
thats a bike I would buy!!
Just for the design i’m goin to buy one fr sure
Change the design? are people blind, it's not the same and it looks awesome anyway.
Yeahhh...except the new exhaust design...its the same looking bike as yesterday...
You are blind clearly
@@rohitchowdary27 "Blind clearly" is that irony, I don't see it!
@@abymathew295 No mate! they did not change it in one day.
Beg to differ ... Not much different especially with that fairing that is too much forward and the ugly headlights screaming 2009 ..
It doesn't look 2019 for some reason.
Love it!
We can assume there will be future releases beyond the Moto2 homage limited edition. If it is as good as they claim, there will be huge demand for this.
Immediate modern classic!
Anyone know the revrange?maxout rpm?
1k more than 675
Every other manufacturer is concentrating on 1000cc (or greater) superbike. I'm glad someone is still building bikes us mere mortals may be able to ride
Yeah and adding power reduction modes making smaller cc bikes like this pointless.. it’s just cost prohibitive to make a crazy lightbike with decent power upgrades ...
Solution: just hand them the same dated product
redesign front end and make it production and I think it would sell well. Missed opportunity, still getting a street triple
Hi Bob :)
It's absolutely gorgeous but I shouldn't be surprised it's a Triumph
Pwolichu machane 💃
Only comes in 1 colour?😕
Are they ever going to build a 999cc+ superbike?
No.
No
That would be great, however it seems to be competitive in WSB and road racing they need to be 4 cylinder for some performance reasons I don't quite understand.
Triumph do not seem to want to make a 4 cylinder. So I guess "no"
They have already triumph rocket 3
@@naisingjamatia8700 Haha ! I was thinking a 1000cc superbike capable of WSB , Isle of Man TT and other road races. I wasn't thinking of a MONSTER cruiser bike :)
(I'd love a go on a Rocket, doubt I'll ever own one)
Love that BW is giving MotoBob some gigs!
jeeeez , the advertising in the beginning......how much wood do you want us to touch ?
You can really hear that catalytic converter choking the sound. I'm going to drool when I hear it with a thru-pipe.
6, 7 and 5 had to there huh Triumph.
$18k In the USA???
Bring a Daytona with more POWER!!!
Ni antara moto paling aku suka Sebb Moden dai garam
I would love to see Street Triple with this chasis and engine.
Casual Rider Street Triple RS?
@@AndreasBrOlesen It's close, but no as close. RS is agressive and all, but stripping this Daytona and turning it into streetfighter would be more radical in my opinion.
I wish they would have put the Speed Triple's 1050 engine in this.
It's really heavy.
They need a new proper high displacement engine, that one is basically 20 years old.
Why do the people doing the interviews appear to have no understanding of what the expert is saying... Mhmm, Hmm... right... Hmm...Mhmm, right...
The Mighty Dash And you’d be so good at it, we’re missing out not having you on the show...
I was at a dealership today.. the were promised 1!
I soooo wanna get one.. Daytonas have always bin the best lookin bile out there i think.. but as a first bike😂
I am older and responsible.. but i wonder if its any good to just drive around on.. cant decide. The one at the store aint taken yet🤔
Wonder what the price will be?
My guess would be around £19k to buy and another £170/month to insure.. oh lord.. i dont have a car.. thats one thing thats 👍🏻 for this eventual deal🤔
Hey the Daytona 675R was my first bike... had absolute blast with it! Until some old ass lady pulled out in front of me failing to yield the right of way and I wrecked it. Her insurance paid for everything of course, but yeah this new one will be even better! I just gotta watch out for old drivers
a9653192 haha oh man.. i wanna get one so bad. But the total cost every month is doubled what i get to pay for a street triple. But this one is so sexy
Lindilicious I know what you mean by the price. Hell the same price can get you a decent BMW S1000RR, but since I’ve owned a Daytona 675R in the past. I just had to get this limited edition one! I placed a deposit at a local dealer and I’m 3rd in line... I’m hoping the dealership get at least 5!! I like the narrowness of the Daytona... feels like a 250 punches like a 750... it’s just an amazing middleweight bike for sure.
Go for gsxr 750 instead
1st job, dat exhaust has gotta go and let that triple sing.
Iv heard they have all been sold
Most comments are about the design. The previous gen was a good looking bike. Why change? You should be judging by how it rides and delivers power rather than looks. There is this tiny car manufacturer called Porsche who haven't changed their design in forever.
Exactly! It's all about that engine...
Design matters too.
@@BikeWorldTVshow Really bro ?!
@@authenticmax6350 You're right, design does matter if it was meant to be a new bike. This is a special edition Daytona with a Moto2 engine that cost them a lot of money to develop.
Design matters, most of them are gonna be on the road anyway, u don't want a comment saying nice 675, for track, use race fairing
Perfect between 600 and 1000.
cranky1812 gsxr 750 is a perfect bike 😊👍
almost 20k euro? wtf
Moto2 is more about the Kalex chassis than whatever spec engine they are forced to use. Nobody talks about Triumph at a Moto GP event. Maybe they could form a team.This guy talks like his chassis can run with Kalex.
So it’s a 765 with parts raided from the 1050 speed triple rs parts bin
Totally off topic but Speed Twin R when?
Harry Mclean holy crapp if only that shit would be crazyyy
My bog standard Speed Twin makes my trousers go brown and smelly every time I ride it.
It's pretty easy to ride, it just has so much tempting power.
Maybe I should have realised my limitations as a newbie and got an RE Interceptor !
I am hoping I will grow into the Speed Twins abilities, so no need for an "R" version for me just yet :)
@@karlosh2422 I know I've tested one and loved it. The only think I didn't like was the look of the front forks and the rear shock. It would look a lot better with thruxton r suspension on. But I love that engine it dominates the whole bike.
@@harrymc9263 I can see why some riders will want a Speed Twin R, I personally just don't need that yet, I am not good enough !
On the looks, they should have had an all brushed stainless steel exhaust. Black sections look silly to me, but I guess Triumph needed an extra reason to sell the vance and hines :)
Otherwise I love my Speed Twin.
@@karlosh2422 totally agree with that. Vance & Hines look much better but don't sound significantly different. Just a way of getting money out of people
Are they seriously gonna put the old daytona's fairings and headlight on the new 765....😡😡😠😡😡😠😡😡😠😠😡😡😡😠😡😡😠😠😠😡😡😡😠😡🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
They have a limited budget, redesigns cost a fortune, tooling costs a fortune, all the electronics, abs, TC, the moto2 engines, everything, if they redesigned the bodywork too, it's be double the money.
Looks like a 2001 R6
??? WHere is Yammie Noob ???
Hahahahaha
Soooo no mention of price , weight , power , rev limit or top speed. I do like the look of the frame and swingarm , the engine is interesting too.
chris vinicombe the price is literally mentioned in the title of the video.
@@chubbz5150ify hahaha well I feel stupid now
they should have updated the looks ;(
Yammie Noob will surely get this. 😂
Under his driving, it won't last
So the engine in this is Euro 4.
I can't believe they haven't got a Euro 5 engine for the Street or Speed Triple. Surely one of them would fit.
Triumph have been missing a production faired sports bike for a while.
For this price it includes a shit piece of meccano 0:33 to steady the radiator, and worse still, they have fastened it to the worse possible place using one of the engine-case cover bolts.
If I could afford it it's the only new bike I'd buy
put that engine in a gen2 and you have a winner. 765 engine in gen3 doesnt make it any more appealing
Engine is ideal for sport street riding. Bring back the 750's people - they are very capable and fun and you don't need all the nanny electronics on them either.
This - to little and f- Euro 5 bureaucrat B.S.
the thing that annoys me is thet all that ABS, TC, Euro emissions etc etc etc costs the manufacturers a fortune to comply with, so small companies just can't compete and then go under, I like what CCM are doing with the spitfire, they make just change 1 thing on their bikes just before the number gets over the EU limit for "limited production" models, which means they dont have to meet regulations, then they rename it and rerelease, hence why their are 5 or 6 CCM Spitfire varients... Everytime they reach the limit, it gets a new seat design and a rename ;)
If i could afford it, i would slam down the cash for it in an instant. But i'm poor, so all i can do is watch it go by...😢
Didn’t think they’d literally just dump a 765 engine and electronics into a 6 year old design. Disappointing.
If only. They haven't.
Looks like they have!
They'll make it a production model of this later, they always do. Which is why I don't get why they made it look virtually identical to the 675. If they release the production bike and it looks updated, people who bought this will feel cheated. If they don't, nobody will buy it. They've screwed themselves with this one.
Sounds exactly like the old 675 daytona
Oh my the engine is amazing but the body work is same same. That's dissapointing the exhaust looks like its off a Norton commando...
Underslung pipe and a moto 2 upper fairing delete that ugly centre light would be nice
Still 1 of the best bikes in the triumph collection but could of done better and for 30 K Aud for a rehash chassis basically no thx..
Couldnt have made it look like something from this decade?
Wtf are you talking about? Beautiful bike
Looks like the old one
agree, why not make it a "new" design?!
No it doesn't.
the original 2006 Daytona 675 was such a gorgeous bike, that any revision that came after it was just a downgrade. If you lined this new bike up alongside the original, pretty much any layperson would say that the original 2006 bike is the newer one, do doubt... It's not bad, it;s just nothing special anymore, maybe even a bit boring.
I dont know about u but the style of this bikes tail gives away the fact thats its newer... the rest still looks a bit outdated... i thought they would make a new bike entirely but ut seems they just upgraded the older one with the new engine and some features, made it a limited production bike and called it a day... kinda disappointing tbh
I have a number 42 of 47 Danny eslick 675r, if anyone is willing to trade there new 765r please let me know. That will be the only way I will let it go . The bikes are truly amazing and reading all the comments about it's not a 1000cc or it looks old just don't appreciate it for what it is . If it looks so bad then why every time I take it somewhere it's surrounded by people praising it .
So basically, if you only use on the road, it's not worth it. Don't need the multiple function screen, all the different modes etc etc.
Then if you want to take it on track, you'll be too worried about damaging it, as it's costly & carbon fibre panels.
More expensive to buy, more to insure, wouldn't a Daytona 675 or 675R suit 99% of people better?
I have one bike is amazing i❤
Triumph y u no make IT new 0_0 this is a nice bike but you can do better !
128.2 BHP is what it's kicking out.
I'd say regardless of anything else it's expensive!
That's very similar to what the 675 daytona motor put out. I'd rather have my old one back :)
The 765 Street Triple isn't making that much more power than the old 675 Street triple either. But, it still feels like a much better and much more powerful bike.
I thought it may have been 130BHP+. The street triple is 123BHP and wasn't the old Daytona about 125BHP.
I know it's a limited run but at 16 grand you're into big bike territory where BMW and KTM are kicking out over 160BHP for the same money
The Ducati 959 is in this price bracket and they are around the 150BHP.
Great looking bike but a bit weak on power a Gsxr750r puts out around 150hp ish
It seems a lot of this "it isn't putting much more power, but has more displacement" moaning is mainly due to meeting Euro 4 as compared to Euro 3 regs.
I don't know what any of the bike manufacturers can do about that, they've all had to up displacement and reduce fuel consumption and emissions to balance competing objectives.
Of course 'limited edition!' (yay), but it's a bit hard to see the value in this once you get past that. The chassis and brake setup is 100% what you get in a Street Triple RS, with slightly different (not necessarily much better) forks. Even the pegs are pretty much in the same position. Exhaust sounds 'meh' at best (of course it would with that huge cat box hanging below). It has a fairing, but with an older design. So if you must have a track bike with clip-ons, why not just pick up an older Daytona (R)? And if clip-ons don't matter, a second-hand 765 RS or R. Unless it's the extra power you are after, but then you might as well go all the way and surely a new S1000RR (which can't be much more expensive) then dumps all over this?
Biased opinion here (since its my profile pic) - find a new "in box" old model MV F3 800 have a lighter bike with more power (from the specs I have seen anyway not sure if they were mock specs or not) and still all the fancy stuff. Saved me 7k over the price of this "special edition"
Rather buy a 675 for less than half the money of this, triumph could of done so much better
Interviewer looked bored 😕
He looks like he doesn't understand what the guys saying...
cutting the bullshit, its a 675 daytona with a 765 engine shoe-horned in and upgraded add-ons.
i think it looks sick you can’t win with people either they update it and it looks shit or they keep the older model looks with a spin and it’s still shit.
Lost interest when the 1000cc Daytona was finished,
£15k? Al pass on this one..
@yammie_noob
The performance of the engine is very underwhelming, sound to be the ordinary 765 engine from the street triple with different gearbox cogs.... Shit Triumph, don't go overdoing it with the effort. It's basically the 675 Daytona R with the 765 engine and Carbon Fibre fairings to dress it up as something more special than it is.
Do people in the comments section just love moaning? 🤔
The daytona was never an ugly bike, this ones gonna sound even better and go better!
Dont like it?.. dont buy one! simple
It´s not moanig, but after all I just I expected something more different to the old model. The exhaust and the horse power for a price tag like that that, almost 19'000 Swiss Francs, are shouting out loud: "Are you serious?"
For half the price or even less I can get an old Daytona. I don´t think I`m so much slower with it on a funny day on a race track.
It’s not a case of moaning, people, including myself, are disappointed that triumph were lazy and are effectively trying to pass off a 12k bike for 16k. I want a new Daytona for 16k, not an old Daytona with a new dash and engine. It’s a marketing rip off
@@cyclingtothemoon2539 dont buy one then
mark675 I won’t. Doesn’t stop me from being disappointed though
So people can't speak their mind anymore and you expect everyone to participate in a circlejerk ??
The design department kinda got lazy and it shows, period.
That doesn't mean that it's not a great bike but when you sell this in 2020 people do expect something special and in the look department the 765 has already lost.
Great motor and potential yet still maintained the old look, looks outdated and like shit. Never been a fan of the body works and wish they would've come out with something fresh, different, and updated.
Little let down by the ageing design.
🤔the design is a bit too.... "boring" for such a bike
It looks like it was designed a decade ago...
Puff Daddy FPV that’s true...
Enjoy the bike life mate🤙
カッコ悪い、というのが第一印象。
乗り味だけでの勝負か。
Kinda crap that it still has those awful Halogens :-/
Agreed.... almost 2020 and manufacturers are still putting halogens on bikes? LEDs are literally a night and day difference when night riding, it's safer! Not to mention they look better as well.
@@mitsuninja Idd, i bought a Z1000SX 2 years ago and that has LEDs stock, as you say it is a HUGE difference over halogens. First time i drove on a smaller road without streetlights with the Daytona i had to have highbeams on all the time to see where the hell i was going, not a hit with the oncoming traffic.
@@Sunedosa my eyes were open when I switched the crap halogens from my s1000r to LEDs and the difference was like going from Super Mario World to Super Mario 64; the jump in visibility was insane! BMW should be ashamed for putting shit lights on that bike and it's a MY17. There really is just no excuse to still use halogens anymore; LEDs are superior in everyway, they last longer and just safer for riders.
@@mitsuninja Idd, for the money they're asking for it there's no excuse tbh. I'd hazard a guess that 95% of the parts would bolt right on a 13 675R, apart from the TFT screen, the engine and the carbon body work wich are basicly carbon versions of the same plastics i have on my 13 non R there's nothing new afaik. It's obvious that they have no intention of prolonging the production beyond the limited edition model, no extra effort has been made. Underwhelmed, even feels low on power imo, should be 140ish as the MV800 and not the same 128hp as the 675 version.
@@Sunedosa definitely a missed opportunity for sure. The new Daytona could've been really special if Triumph actually gave it the love and respect that it deserved.. does this even have a quickshifter? I was kinda doing other stuff while watching this vid so missed it if they did mention that.
Headlights too small. Make em Lexus big
Is that kid old enough to grow a beard?
Too bad the styling didn't evolve.
Engines come 1st design come 2nd but if u dont like its buy others
Kind of disappointed... It's a "normal" Daytona with a breathed on 765 engine and fancy paint. Not exactly what i'd call a "Moto 2 bike for the road" imo anyway. Good to see the Daytona back tho
This is proof that opinions can be wrong lol. The new Daytona was always going to have a 765 just as the triples have, and this one has been more than "breathed on" plus you forgot to mention all the carbon fibre, and there are the chassis/dimensions changes. The "normal" one if it does turn up (I hope, and think it would be odd not to) will not be as tuned and obviously heavier by a fair bit with less trick parts as standard.
Halfdead Rider ..i kind of agree with you but 'talk' of a 765 have been rumoured for so long that the style has aged!
@@MrStr8den The style has definitely been tweaked, and why totally change it? It would not be Triumph Daytona then, and I absolutely love the style. I'd have one in a heartbeat if I could.
who the fuck pays 15k for a 75 triumph Oo
Thank goodness they got rid of that awful nose! The 675 went downhill after the second revision.
Try again...maybe a Sprint GT 1200 ? You would thing they would try to use that 1200cc LUMP in more bikes than one in order to recuperate R&D costs back ASAP. 🙄👎
Hate how the manufacturers use “limited” to create marketing hype.