One coworker of mine here in Norway was half Sami. Good looking people with a mix of Asiatic and Scandi features, striking eyes. I'm from South America, my father and my maternal great grandma had strong Indigenous ancestry, so in a way I feel kinda connectes to Sami people. I feel we descend from a same commong ancestor when it comes to our Asiatic ancestry. I guess some people of an Asian tribe went across the Behring Strait while others from that same tribe decided to go west.
That's exact i'm Mongol, we practice Shamanism like native siberian Saami and America's Indigenous. Thousands years ago our commun ancestors lived in Siberia ❤
@@Miki-fl9ez Took from wikipedia Since the term 'Ancient North Eurasian' refers to a genetic bridge of connected mating networks, scholars of comparative mythology have argued that they probably shared myths and beliefs that could be reconstructed via the comparison of stories attested within cultures that were not in contact for millennia and stretched from the Pontic-Caspian steppe to the American continent.[4] For instance, the mytheme of the dog guarding the Otherworld possibly stems from an older Ancient North Eurasian belief, as suggested by similar motifs found in Indo-European, Native American and Siberian mythology. In Siouan, Algonquian, Iroquoian, and in Central and South American beliefs, a fierce guard dog was located in the Milky Way, perceived as the path of souls in the afterlife, and getting past it was a test. The Siberian Chukchi and Tungus believed in a guardian-of-the-afterlife dog and a spirit dog that would absorb the dead man's soul and act as a guide in the afterlife. In Indo-European myths, the figure of the dog is embodied by Cerberus, Sarvarā, and Garmr. In Zoroastrianism, two four-eyed dogs guard the bridge to the afterlife called Chinvat Bridge. Anthony and Brown note that it might be one of the oldest mythemes recoverable through comparative mythology.[4]
@@barguttobed Mongolia another country with beautiful people and land of the legendary Genghis Khan😊 I've heard some songs from The HU, amazing metal band!
No, exactly 400 years ago Lapland, North Siberia and North Scandinavia are united to Greenland and North Canada because no have sea but ice, all North Polo are united with ice, and many people go between them
No there NOT ~There were back 'n forth migrations from The America's and Finland. H ow d o you think Samis' build Tee pees and board their infants like Native-Americans and ancient Mexicans! Samis are part Mexican 😳😳😁🤓!
Nice results! Sàmi people and their culture & Mythology are so UNIQUE!! -The Sàmi people are one of the oldest nations in Europe. -Sàmis score the highest Scandinvian Hunter-Gatherer (SHG) ancestry out of all Scandinavians and it counts from 20%-25%. -Sàmis score around 15%-25% East-Asian related ancestry which comes from the Uralic migrations from Siberia, their East-Asian ancestry is mostly from Amur River_HG related populations and a little bit from Yellow River Neolithic, that's why they're closely related to Russian Perms than other Finns and Karelians.
originally full sami is much more that 15-25% asian. Like 30-60% depending of person. Probably some families still are more now but most are very mixed to our euro neighbors like finns and norwegians. Sami finn mix myself
@@k1r4z. Western Finns have about 4% of Siberia, while it is not 100% Mongoloid with the contribution of ANE. Among the Eastern Finns, it fluctuates at the level of 7-8%.
This is interesting, been kind of waiting for this. I am finnish, and I have finnish, Inuit and Mesoamerican. Have been wondering about my one ancestral line if they have Sami. Well, I still am wondering :D
I’m a northern-saami and my dna results from myheritage is: 79.4% Finnish, 8.2% Central Asian, 6.6% Inuit, 1.6% Chinese and Vietnamese. 4.2% Mesoamerican and Andean. ydna N-PH4577 and mtdna U5b1b1a1
These dna tests do not work for sami and other small groups because the test company does not even know existence of sami so its not option. The point of these tests is to show modern location of your ancestry 500 years ago or so,, not ancient ancestral location. These tests are made for modern day americans mostly to show where they came from to usa, lets be honest. It says finnish chinese native american inuit to sami because the company has no option to sami as it should, so it shows other closely similar genetic groups instead. You are probably almost full mix of finnish and sami ancestry so in other words mostly north asian, paleo north european, indoeuro/iranic mix. It says inuit, mesoamerican, andean, chinese, vietnamese because those people originate from asia or live there and half of original sami ancestry came from north asia from siberia over ural mountains 4000 years ago and the migration back leads to whats now amur siberia, mantsuria china area. Even finns are 4-15% asian, so you are probably between 20-35% as most modern day saami are, but the old time sami with no mix to finns, norwegians, russians etc were lot more than that i imagine. Just looking old photos from 1800s and early 1900s some sami look even full asian or native american. Im from sami ancestry northern Inari lake area
Main line of Male Genes (haplogroups N (47%), I (31%) and R1a (11%). Russians (R) + Russians (I) = Yugoslavs = Swedes + real ancient Finns nomads :) (N ) Women ? Whichever woman is caught is the one she will be :)) (Closed societies generally offered a wife to the traveler so that the clan would be stronger. Hehe) And these Tests “you are 74 Finnish!” - it just shows who they fucked with. Naturally, people in the same area fuck each other. They travel to different villages and look for a bride. They didn’t come up with another way :))) (Sperm had not been sent by mail before)
That explains it. I had inhuit in my DNA results, which is quite unusual for an Afro Caribbean person. I had also had Saami in there so perhaps the inhuit DNA comes from the Saami ancestor of mine.
these tests do not work for sami and mansi and other small not so well known people because the test makers do not even know existence of sami or other small groups
I have Sami and Inuit but the reason is my great great grandfather ended up in Alaska right after it was bought from the Russians and he married a native Alaskan...my great great grandmother. We have one picture of them and its amazing how similar they look racially with Asian looking eyes. Those features are all gone now after adding Polish, Italian and good old Finnish to the family mix!
That shows that Turks are really related with Finns. If you know the homeland of Turks is Central Asia and the Native Americans have their dna origin of central asia, that ancient Turkic empires were a lot present in asia.... and that Attila is the common ancestor of Turks and Hungarians. Yes its true. We are related with Finns and have as well Shaman rituals
Sami people came from Siberia, their ancestors were northern Mongoloid, after so many years they are still quart Siberian by dna and their way of life and beliefs resemble those of native siberians rather europeans. ❤ Ural-Altai connexion 🐺🐻
That's why i specialize only in crypto trading, i have made up to $10,300 profit and it's been sent to my portfolio every week, Expert Patrick Archie is amazing
I have also been trading with him, the profit are secured if that's your fear, over a 85% return on your investment directly sent to your wallet, I am a living testimony of his work
I'm not surprised because I've made a huge profit since i started investing with him, crypto trading and other investment's are very profitable with Mr Patrick Archie
Wait, I have similar estimates on my test. Mostly (Baltic, Eastern European, central Asian, indigenous Inuit and Chinese) while my family claims always been from the Soviet Union region. Is it possible that the the results actually showing sami ancestry?
Finns and Sami are the Metis of Russians (R) \ Russians represented by Yugoslavia and Swedes (Swedes came from Russia through the Balkans to Sweden) (I) and Chinese reindeer herders nomads.
Norway has got the biggest number of Sami ppl. Sweden is the second and Finland has the least number of them out of Nordic countries. They have a unique and wonderful culture. Compeletly different from other Nordic countries.
Turkic people mostly have central Asian and Inuit dna. But the oldest ones Altaians have even Andean and Mesoamerican. When I watched the photos and dresses of Turkic and indigenous people of Americas I sow a lot of common thing. And one detail, Turkic people gave name to their children in accordance to his/her noticable ability or any noticeable coincidence. For example, girl born in a rainy nigt called Yagush (rain) or boy during the thunderstorm called Jyldyrym. If not that hapens, for example if a child succeeds on doing something (s)he will be called based on this. For example, a boy that killed angry buffalo -Boga called Bogaç,. Islam changed us unfortunately.
Sami is not Asiatic, their DNA is Finnish, their language is Finno-Ugric, original unmixed Samis have dark skin, small eyes, button noses, high cheekbones but their eyes’ orbits are not as shallow as Asians. Middle Easterners & India’s Indians have narrow noses - are they considered to be Caucasians or related to whites? Original inhabitants/“indigenous” people of Xinjiang, China are flame haired, white skinned Caucasians (c.f. Tarim Basin mummies) - this is complete with archaeological evidence. But for Samis to be so-called “related” to Asians is a complete myth with no archaeological evidence whatsoever
@@PROSPEROUSWEARNE Im sami and can tell you 100% sure we are from north asian origin mixing to euros 4000 years ago. Its not myth. And yes there is archeological genetic linguistic and cultural proof you silly adolf h 88 fan club boy XD Get a lifepleasedumnazi. I look asian. All my sami ancestry look asian. If you look old sami photos you will see more and more asian the older photos you see. We are very mixed to euro neighbors now thats why we are so white now
if you mean native as in who were there first, then it is the Scandinavians, Sami came last to Scandinavia they are called indigenous to protect their culture and language as a minority , however Scandinavians share between 42-50% dna with the first people who came to Scandinavia 12.000 years ago, the eastern hunter gatherers (with a mix of western hunter gatherers) Sami came to Scandinavia about 2000 years ago-to Finland maybe 3500 years ago @@Mattis06
they are labeled indigenous to protect their culture as a minority, and it also have to do with their traditional culture that some still live by -but you are correct Scandinavians as in Swedes, Norweigians and Danes were first in Scandinavia, they share dna with the population that arrived when the ice melted 12.000 years ago
@@veronicajensen7690 well i thought they were indigenous to the north of Scandinavia( didn’t mean to say the entirety) but if what you say is correct then i am sorry i was wrong
Elder C2, D, K2 of southeast asians were ancestors of all australians, austronesians having C4, O1, O2, M, S haplogroups, ancient east asians AEA having D, O1, O2, O3 haplogroups and ancient northern east asians ANEA having C3, N, O3, P1 haplogroups. These ANEA people were living near Liao river and speaking uralic-altaic languages 9k years ago. (Reference: Martine Robbeets / Max Planck Institut) They have separated to different ethnicities as C3 mongolic, tungusic, N uralic, finnic, O3 koreanic, japonic, P1 hunnic, turkic, ugric in different regions. P1 haplogroup hunnic, turkic, ugric people have separated into Q dene-yeniseian, native american and R again hunnic, turkic, ugric people. All R1, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna haplogroups are descendants of central asian R hunnic, turkic, ugric people but mixed with G caucasian arians, J2 grecoromans, persians, I1 germanic visigoths, I2 slavic ostrogoths and taken maternal phenotypical caucasoid mtdna from indoeuropeans partly. Some turkic people did not mix and protected both paternal and maternal dna features. Actually, C2, C3, C4, D, K2, M, N, O1, O2, O3, P, P1, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2, S haplogroups are both genetically and linguistically connected as: Australian, Austronesian, Papuan, Austroasiatic, Thai-Kadai, Tibeto-Burman, Sinitic Chinese, Koreanic, Japonic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Uralic, Finnic, Ugric, Dene-Yeniseian, Native American, Altaic, Hunnic, Turkic, Burushaski Hunza, Dravidian, North Caucasian, Avar Andic, Sumerian, Elamite, Old Anatolian, Tyrrhenian, Etruscan, Raetic, Vasconic, Basq, Aquitan, Old Saxonian, Old Scottish etc...
So I have a good chunk of Finnish in me but I have no idea where that came from or why it’s very prevalent on my mom side of the family. My mom and her side of the family are white but have dark to light brown hair and hazel to brown eyes eyes and most of them have a sort of olive complexion unlike me who tends to freckle. I guess I had a stereotypical view about people from the northern regions of Scandinavia. But as to what region they came from I have no idea. I just expected Finland?
Sami is not Asiatic, their DNA is Finnish, their language is Finno-Ugric, original unmixed Samis have dark skin, small eyes, button noses, high cheekbones but their eyes’ orbits are not as shallow as Asians. Middle Easterners & India’s Indians have narrow noses - are they considered to be Caucasians or related to whites? Original inhabitants/“indigenous” people of Xinjiang, China are flame haired, white skinned Caucasians (c.f. Tarim Basin mummies) - this is complete with archaeological evidence. But for Samis to be so-called “related” to Asians is a complete myth with no archaeological evidence whatsoever
There are Finns with dark hair & dark eyes, some also have skin with a warm undertone that tans easily. My own Finnish mother and lots of her relatives are like this.
@@cinderellaandstepsisters (I wasn't replying to your comment) my point was that we aren't all blond with blue eyes, so not having those features doesn't mean OP's roots are Sami or whatever. There are lots of dark haired people in Finland and honestly most blond people here are this color we call "maantienharmaa" (roughly: dirt road gray), I guess it's like dirty blonde in English? Not really that angelic blond streteotype that foreigners tend to think of. lol
The Finn-Ugric have Haplogroups N, these are distributed mainly in the Pontic steppes, Northern Russia, Finland and Northern Sweden, at lower frequencies, Haplogroup N is found in Southern Sweden and very low in the South from Norway.
@@culto779 maybe it is so. The earlier population of the areas before uralic speaking people from siberia migrated there could have been ANE very much. But the similarity between us saami and native american mostly comes from ancient siberian/east asian people. Not from ANE.
@@Viso333 The Eastern Hunter Gatherers are 75% ANE and 25% WHG, EHG is directly responsible for the R1 Haplogroups in Europeans, they contributed 50% to the DNA of the Indo-Europeans, the British or the Scottish have 20% DNA ANE, in Scandinavia there was a more recent wave of Siberians, closely related to Nganasan, who carried the Uralic languages. Other populations with ANE DNA are the Iranians and the people of Central Asia. Their DNA Iranian is derived from CHG, but CHG themselves are a mixture of Dzudzuana and ANE.
These tests do not work for sami at all because test maker does not probably know that we exist and also its meant to show ancestry of modern locations not origin of the ancestry thousands of years ago. But yes our asian ancestry is from siberia not from mongolia
@@SK-nw4ig The Ancient North Eurasians - a genetically identifiable population that came from Siberia and left a genetic mark that can still be seen today. I think from memory (which can be faulty) people who bear most overall ANE similarity are Amerindians.
I wonder who are you to claim that they are not indigenous because of the ANE component? The Sami have existed since the times when mammoths were hunted, that means long before the Europeans existed.Europeans are barely 6k old, and the Sami are like 30k old. Why do you say they are not native? Just because you say so.
Among all ethnicities, it has the largest mix of Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers, with 18% mix. Other ethnicities in Scandinavia, such as the Norwegians or the Swedes, only have 10% SHG. Most of the DNA of the Scandinavians derives from the Corded Ware culture in the Baltic mixed with the Bell Beaker culture belonging to the European Farmers.
The European farmers of the Bell Beaker culture are predominantly Anatolians mixed with Western Hunter Gatherers, the Bell Beaker Culture was in the Northeast with the Baltic and Russia being its point of diffusion, Bell Beaker is a mixture of peoples from the Pontic Steppe or Proto-Indo-Europeans ( Ukraine, Southern Russia, part of Kazakhstan). Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers are characterized by having olive skin with light eyes and dark hair, according to genetic models.
The mitochondrial DNA of the Sami is U5b1, a maternal lineage corresponding to the Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers and the paternal lineage is N1a1 corresponding to the Siberian Indigenous, more precisely of the Nganasan type.
![Three Days with the Sámi Reindeer People [Swedish Lapland]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/0Tf2Qgcvfk4/mqdefault.jpg)
![Three Days with the Sámi Reindeer People [Swedish Lapland]](/img/tr.png)
One coworker of mine here in Norway was half Sami. Good looking people with a mix of Asiatic and Scandi features, striking eyes. I'm from South America, my father and my maternal great grandma had strong Indigenous ancestry, so in a way I feel kinda connectes to Sami people. I feel we descend from a same commong ancestor when it comes to our Asiatic ancestry. I guess some people of an Asian tribe went across the Behring Strait while others from that same tribe decided to go west.
And because of the Ancestral North Eurasian
That's exact i'm Mongol, we practice Shamanism like native siberian Saami and America's Indigenous. Thousands years ago our commun ancestors lived in Siberia ❤
@@Miki-fl9ez Took from wikipedia
Since the term 'Ancient North Eurasian' refers to a genetic bridge of connected mating networks, scholars of comparative mythology have argued that they probably shared myths and beliefs that could be reconstructed via the comparison of stories attested within cultures that were not in contact for millennia and stretched from the Pontic-Caspian steppe to the American continent.[4]
For instance, the mytheme of the dog guarding the Otherworld possibly stems from an older Ancient North Eurasian belief, as suggested by similar motifs found in Indo-European, Native American and Siberian mythology. In Siouan, Algonquian, Iroquoian, and in Central and South American beliefs, a fierce guard dog was located in the Milky Way, perceived as the path of souls in the afterlife, and getting past it was a test. The Siberian Chukchi and Tungus believed in a guardian-of-the-afterlife dog and a spirit dog that would absorb the dead man's soul and act as a guide in the afterlife. In Indo-European myths, the figure of the dog is embodied by Cerberus, Sarvarā, and Garmr. In Zoroastrianism, two four-eyed dogs guard the bridge to the afterlife called Chinvat Bridge. Anthony and Brown note that it might be one of the oldest mythemes recoverable through comparative mythology.[4]
@@barguttobed Mongolia another country with beautiful people and land of the legendary Genghis Khan😊 I've heard some songs from The HU, amazing metal band!
No, exactly 400 years ago Lapland, North Siberia and North Scandinavia are united to Greenland and North Canada because no have sea but ice, all North Polo are united with ice, and many people go between them
This percentage of Mesoamericans and Andeans is a misinterpretation of Siberian genes.
No it isn’t.
No there NOT ~There were back 'n forth migrations from The America's and Finland. H ow d o you think Samis' build Tee pees and board their infants like Native-Americans and ancient Mexicans! Samis are part Mexican 😳😳😁🤓!
@@anonymousanonymous4690 Of course it is. This particular Sami person does not have an ancestor from the Andies in their ancestral line 150 years ago.
Ancient North Eurasians
@@mike-me7om💯
Nice results! Sàmi people and their culture & Mythology are so UNIQUE!!
-The Sàmi people are one of the oldest nations in Europe.
-Sàmis score the highest Scandinvian Hunter-Gatherer (SHG) ancestry out of all Scandinavians and it counts from 20%-25%.
-Sàmis score around 15%-25% East-Asian related ancestry which comes from the Uralic migrations from Siberia, their East-Asian ancestry is mostly from Amur River_HG related populations and a little bit from Yellow River Neolithic, that's why they're closely related to Russian Perms than other Finns and Karelians.
originally full sami is much more that 15-25% asian. Like 30-60% depending of person. Probably some families still are more now but most are very mixed to our euro neighbors like finns and norwegians. Sami finn mix myself
They are similar to Aoluguya Ewenki people.
@@MrPaleolithic average swede in mid sweden score over 50% shg
As it's expected for Sami, 75% European and 25% Siberian nice 👌👍
Finnish already has %10 east eurasian ancestry so their east eurasian ancestry is higher
@@k1r4z. 8%*
@@isadanjan4762 i just round it up and the "average" changes by samples tbh. Ive mostly seen %8-10 so the average is rather %9
@@k1r4z.
Western Finns have about 4% of Siberia, while it is not 100% Mongoloid with the contribution of ANE. Among the Eastern Finns, it fluctuates at the level of 7-8%.
@@k1r4z.
Finn
# Population Percent
1 North_Sea 26.86
2 Eastern_Euro 23
3 Baltic 22.96
4 Atlantic 14.17
5 Siberian 7.28
6 West_Med 3.75
7 South_Asian 0.89
8 Amerindian 0.67
9 Southeast_Asian 0.42
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 East_Finnish 2.82
2 Finnish 5.79
3 Kargopol_Russian 8.85
4 Estonian 9.04
5 Southwest_Finnish 9.15
6 Ukrainian 11.18
7 Polish 11.48
8 South_Polish 12
9 Erzya 12.06
10 Ukrainian_Lviv 12.26
11 Southwest_Russian 12.55
12 Estonian_Polish 13.22
13 Belorussian 13.46
14 Russian_Smolensk 13.59
15 Ukrainian_Belgorod 13.67
16 North_Swedish 14.74
17 Lithuanian 15.42
18 Hungarian 15.45
19 East_German 15.82
20 Croatian 16.14
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 84.8% East_Finnish + 15.2% Finnish @ 2.67
2 91.2% East_Finnish + 8.8% Estonian @ 2.7
3 93.1% East_Finnish + 6.9% Ukrainian @ 2.71
4 94.3% East_Finnish + 5.7% Ukrainian_Lviv @ 2.73
5 96.8% East_Finnish + 3.2% Swedish @ 2.75
East Finn
Finn
# Population Percent
1 North_Sea 27.8
2 Baltic 23.67
3 Eastern_Euro 20.47
4 Atlantic 19.37
5 Siberian 4.7
6 South_Asian 1.81
7 West_Med 1.15
8 Oceanian 0.75
9 Amerindian 0.27
Single Population Sharing:
# Population (source) Distance
1 Finnish 3.81
2 Southwest_Finnish 5.21
3 East_Finnish 5.88
4 Estonian 7.15
5 Polish 9.69
6 South_Polish 10.84
7 Kargopol_Russian 11.18
8 Ukrainian 11.31
9 North_Swedish 11.94
10 Belorussian 12.05
11 Ukrainian_Lviv 12.07
12 Estonian_Polish 12.26
13 Russian_Smolensk 12.26
14 Southwest_Russian 12.29
15 La_Brana-1 13.14
16 Ukrainian_Belgorod 13.42
17 East_German 13.73
18 Lithuanian 14.35
19 Hungarian 14.44
20 Erzya 15.15
Mixed Mode Population Sharing:
# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 84.2% Finnish + 15.8% Estonian_Polish @ 3.1
2 74.4% Finnish + 25.6% Estonian @ 3.1
3 84.2% Finnish + 15.8% Belorussian @ 3.12
4 86.8% Finnish + 13.2% Lithuanian @ 3.17
5 61% Southwest_Finnish + 39% Estonian @ 3.25
6 54.7% Southwest_Finnish + 45.3% East_Finnish @ 3.29
7 86% Finnish + 14% Russian_Smolensk @ 3.29
West Finn
This is interesting, been kind of waiting for this. I am finnish, and I have finnish, Inuit and Mesoamerican. Have been wondering about my one ancestral line if they have Sami. Well, I still am wondering :D
I’m a northern-saami and my dna results from myheritage is: 79.4% Finnish, 8.2% Central Asian, 6.6% Inuit, 1.6% Chinese and Vietnamese. 4.2% Mesoamerican and Andean. ydna N-PH4577 and mtdna U5b1b1a1
These dna tests do not work for sami and other small groups because the test company does not even know existence of sami so its not option. The point of these tests is to show modern location of your ancestry 500 years ago or so,, not ancient ancestral location. These tests are made for modern day americans mostly to show where they came from to usa, lets be honest. It says finnish chinese native american inuit to sami because the company has no option to sami as it should, so it shows other closely similar genetic groups instead. You are probably almost full mix of finnish and sami ancestry so in other words mostly north asian, paleo north european, indoeuro/iranic mix.
It says inuit, mesoamerican, andean, chinese, vietnamese because those people originate from asia or live there and half of original sami ancestry came from north asia from siberia over ural mountains 4000 years ago and the migration back leads to whats now amur siberia, mantsuria china area. Even finns are 4-15% asian, so you are probably between 20-35% as most modern day saami are, but the old time sami with no mix to finns, norwegians, russians etc were lot more than that i imagine. Just looking old photos from 1800s and early 1900s some sami look even full asian or native american. Im from sami ancestry northern Inari lake area
It’s Chinese, MH is so stupid put viet together 🤢
Main line of Male Genes (haplogroups N (47%), I (31%) and R1a (11%).
Russians (R) + Russians (I) = Yugoslavs = Swedes + real ancient Finns nomads :) (N )
Women ? Whichever woman is caught is the one she will be :))
(Closed societies generally offered a wife to the traveler so that the clan would be stronger. Hehe)
And these Tests “you are 74 Finnish!” - it just shows who they fucked with. Naturally, people in the same area fuck each other. They travel to different villages and look for a bride. They didn’t come up with another way :))) (Sperm had not been sent by mail before)
That explains it. I had inhuit in my DNA results, which is quite unusual for an Afro Caribbean person. I had also had Saami in there so perhaps the inhuit DNA comes from the Saami ancestor of mine.
Loved this video as well. 💖
Distance 0.80 - Hun Conqueror Elite. That's nice
All the reindeer are beautiful gorgeous animals.
Wow, they are all beautiful gorgeous animals.
Actually many resemblance with Mansi results
Culture is similar too.
these tests do not work for sami and mansi and other small not so well known people because the test makers do not even know existence of sami or other small groups
I have Sami and Inuit but the reason is my great great grandfather ended up in Alaska right after it was bought from the Russians and he married a native Alaskan...my great great grandmother. We have one picture of them and its amazing how similar they look racially with Asian looking eyes. Those features are all gone now after adding Polish, Italian and good old Finnish to the family mix!
Nice my request
That shows that Turks are really related with Finns. If you know the homeland of Turks is Central Asia and the Native Americans have their dna origin of central asia, that ancient Turkic empires were a lot present in asia.... and that Attila is the common ancestor of Turks and Hungarians. Yes its true. We are related with Finns and have as well Shaman rituals
The Sami are wonderful people.
They have very high cheekbones
Some do
Not all of them.
Sami people came from Siberia, their ancestors were northern Mongoloid, after so many years they are still quart Siberian by dna and their way of life and beliefs resemble those of native siberians rather europeans. ❤ Ural-Altai connexion 🐺🐻
Stay shut up and no Mongolian connection
@@bunurmaini9158 Nesian orc fisherman, uralic ancestors and ours both came from Siberia🤣Or u didnt saw proto-uralic results
@@barguttobed moongglerian orc nmdc stppe bar ba rian I don't see any correlation between sami and mongolic ppl
@@barguttobed u didnt saw gedmatch results BOZO
@@barguttobed1.)en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_idiocy
I would love to get into the nft market but it's expensive with the gas price alone, something could cost $18 but the gas could be over $400
1 week I've spent 1 eth on gas
That's why i specialize only in crypto trading, i have made up to $10,300 profit and it's been sent to my portfolio every week, Expert Patrick Archie is amazing
I have also been trading with him, the profit are secured if that's your fear, over a 85% return on your investment directly sent to your wallet, I am a living testimony of his work
I'm not surprised because I've made a huge profit
since i started investing with him, crypto trading and
other investment's are very profitable with Mr Patrick Archie
@@brownx5694 How do i get in touch with him?
Wait, I have similar estimates on my test. Mostly (Baltic, Eastern European, central Asian, indigenous Inuit and Chinese) while my family claims always been from the Soviet Union region. Is it possible that the the results actually showing sami ancestry?
Finns and Sami are the Metis of Russians (R) \ Russians represented by Yugoslavia and Swedes (Swedes came from Russia through the Balkans to Sweden) (I) and Chinese reindeer herders nomads.
Can you do Medieval azerbaijani dna?( Karakoyunlu and Akkouyunlu tribes 15 th century)?
That is cool. And did I mention: I relly like those cubes that turn into the percentcakes. They look cool.
please do "old berber"
People have been moving around for, what? 200,000 years? 1,000,000 years? The surprise is how constant ancestry remains.
Norway has got the biggest number of Sami ppl. Sweden is the second and Finland has the least number of them out of Nordic countries. They have a unique and wonderful culture. Compeletly different from other Nordic countries.
Can you do dna research of white hunns(Hephtalites)?
Elite Avar warrior (Mongoloid one sample) or Medieval Mongol for next ancient pleaseee
Avar were not mongliods lol i swear your kind always say everyone is mongliod then are proven to be Caucsiod and later mixed with East Asian woman lol
I wonder if any of the ancient samples have DNA matches
Yep, 5-8th centuries individuals from Levanluhta, they had partial siberian east eurasian gene like modern Saami
@@barguttobed I meant modern ones. You usually get modern DNA matches on websites like these.
You can see the common ancestor
2:59 How legit is that? I thought nobody knew where they originated from?
Is this a commercial for gene-producers?
if so its very bad XD because the test very clearly does not know existence of sami people
0:34 adolf hitler chlilling with them samis
Not funny
@Marcus No, but that man is actually hitler after he escaped 1945, he went to live with the samis.
@@Feeelipeeee 📷 A Saami family in Finland in 1936.
Turkic people mostly have central Asian and Inuit dna. But the oldest ones Altaians have even Andean and Mesoamerican. When I watched the photos and dresses of Turkic and indigenous people of Americas I sow a lot of common thing. And one detail, Turkic people gave name to their children in accordance to his/her noticable ability or any noticeable coincidence. For example, girl born in a rainy nigt called Yagush (rain) or boy during the thunderstorm called Jyldyrym. If not that hapens, for example if a child succeeds on doing something (s)he will be called based on this. For example, a boy that killed angry buffalo -Boga called Bogaç,. Islam changed us unfortunately.
Down sendrome kid
Proud islam made you better people
If you disappointed with islam then go back home to Mongolia
@@bunurmaini9158 Wt heck islam made them better in that? All muslim countries are poor, look at indonesia biggest poor muslim country
@@barguttobed L + Ratio
Most random Chinese and Vietnamese. Must be a glitch.
Pretty commun My heritages gives Chinese and Vietnamese as broad east asian dna in little amount even though it must be siberian
@@barguttobednorth East Asians Haplogroup n is from them not East Asians who are o
Sami is not Asiatic, their DNA is Finnish, their language is Finno-Ugric, original unmixed Samis have dark skin, small eyes, button noses, high cheekbones but their eyes’ orbits are not as shallow as Asians. Middle Easterners & India’s Indians have narrow noses - are they considered to be Caucasians or related to whites? Original inhabitants/“indigenous” people of Xinjiang, China are flame haired, white skinned Caucasians (c.f. Tarim Basin mummies) - this is complete with archaeological evidence. But for Samis to be so-called “related” to Asians is a complete myth with no archaeological evidence whatsoever
@@PROSPEROUSWEARNE Im sami and can tell you 100% sure we are from north asian origin mixing to euros 4000 years ago. Its not myth. And yes there is archeological genetic linguistic and cultural proof you silly adolf h 88 fan club boy XD Get a lifepleasedumnazi.
I look asian. All my sami ancestry look asian. If you look old sami photos you will see more and more asian the older photos you see. We are very mixed to euro neighbors now thats why we are so white now
Nowadays many Saami live in big cities.
I dare say they're not the indigenous people of Scandinavia
I believe they are but you don’t so who do you think is indigenous there
if you mean native as in who were there first, then it is the Scandinavians, Sami came last to Scandinavia they are called indigenous to protect their culture and language as a minority , however Scandinavians share between 42-50% dna with the first people who came to Scandinavia 12.000 years ago, the eastern hunter gatherers (with a mix of western hunter gatherers) Sami came to Scandinavia about 2000 years ago-to Finland maybe 3500 years ago @@Mattis06
they are labeled indigenous to protect their culture as a minority, and it also have to do with their traditional culture that some still live by -but you are correct Scandinavians as in Swedes, Norweigians and Danes were first in Scandinavia, they share dna with the population that arrived when the ice melted 12.000 years ago
@@veronicajensen7690 well i thought they were indigenous to the north of Scandinavia( didn’t mean to say the entirety) but if what you say is correct then i am sorry i was wrong
Elder C2, D, K2 of southeast asians were ancestors of all australians, austronesians having C4, O1, O2, M, S haplogroups, ancient east asians AEA having D, O1, O2, O3 haplogroups and ancient northern east asians ANEA having C3, N, O3, P1 haplogroups.
These ANEA people were living near Liao river and speaking uralic-altaic languages 9k years ago. (Reference: Martine Robbeets / Max Planck Institut) They have separated to different ethnicities as C3 mongolic, tungusic, N uralic, finnic, O3 koreanic, japonic, P1 hunnic, turkic, ugric in different regions. P1 haplogroup hunnic, turkic, ugric people have separated into Q dene-yeniseian, native american and R again hunnic, turkic, ugric people.
All R1, R1a, R1b, R2 ydna haplogroups are descendants of central asian R hunnic, turkic, ugric people but mixed with G caucasian arians, J2 grecoromans, persians, I1 germanic visigoths, I2 slavic ostrogoths and taken maternal phenotypical caucasoid mtdna from indoeuropeans partly. Some turkic people did not mix and protected both paternal and maternal dna features.
Actually, C2, C3, C4, D, K2, M, N, O1, O2, O3, P, P1, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2, S haplogroups are both genetically and linguistically connected as:
Australian, Austronesian, Papuan,
Austroasiatic, Thai-Kadai,
Tibeto-Burman, Sinitic Chinese,
Koreanic, Japonic,
Mongolic, Tungusic,
Uralic, Finnic, Ugric,
Dene-Yeniseian, Native American,
Altaic, Hunnic, Turkic,
Burushaski Hunza, Dravidian,
North Caucasian, Avar Andic,
Sumerian, Elamite, Old Anatolian,
Tyrrhenian, Etruscan, Raetic,
Vasconic, Basq, Aquitan,
Old Saxonian, Old Scottish etc...
Stop this
@@famitsus987 What shall I stop? This is how science works.
So I have a good chunk of Finnish in me but I have no idea where that came from or why it’s very prevalent on my mom side of the family. My mom and her side of the family are white but have dark to light brown hair and hazel to brown eyes eyes and most of them have a sort of olive complexion unlike me who tends to freckle. I guess I had a stereotypical view about people from the northern regions of Scandinavia. But as to what region they came from I have no idea. I just expected Finland?
Sami is not Asiatic, their DNA is Finnish, their language is Finno-Ugric, original unmixed Samis have dark skin, small eyes, button noses, high cheekbones but their eyes’ orbits are not as shallow as Asians. Middle Easterners & India’s Indians have narrow noses - are they considered to be Caucasians or related to whites? Original inhabitants/“indigenous” people of Xinjiang, China are flame haired, white skinned Caucasians (c.f. Tarim Basin mummies) - this is complete with archaeological evidence. But for Samis to be so-called “related” to Asians is a complete myth with no archaeological evidence whatsoever
Finns and Samis are different races.
Watch the video "Which country has the most blondies?"
The answer is Finland.
There are Finns with dark hair & dark eyes, some also have skin with a warm undertone that tans easily. My own Finnish mother and lots of her relatives are like this.
@@vffncl0 of course , but percentually Finland has got less them than other countries. If you like it or not.
@@cinderellaandstepsisters
(I wasn't replying to your comment) my point was that we aren't all blond with blue eyes, so not having those features doesn't mean OP's roots are Sami or whatever. There are lots of dark haired people in Finland and honestly most blond people here are this color we call "maantienharmaa" (roughly: dirt road gray), I guess it's like dirty blonde in English? Not really that angelic blond streteotype that foreigners tend to think of. lol
Finland is not scandinavia
finland is not part of scandinavia.....
The Finn-Ugric have Haplogroups N, these are distributed mainly in the Pontic steppes, Northern Russia, Finland and Northern Sweden, at lower frequencies, Haplogroup N is found in Southern Sweden and very low in the South from Norway.
The Finns have the highest levels of ANE and EHG DNA, ANE gave rise to EHG, and the mixture of EHG with CHG gave rise to the Indo-Europeans
Actually Scandinavia is western part of FENNOScandia peninsula.
The original people of Finland were the Ancient North Eurasians. They are the same people native Americans are descended from.
nope
@@Viso333 based on what evidence?
@@Viso333Studies indicate that the Udmurt and the Sami have 30% of Ancient North Eurasian.
@@culto779 maybe it is so. The earlier population of the areas before uralic speaking people from siberia migrated there could have been ANE very much. But the similarity between us saami and native american mostly comes from ancient siberian/east asian people. Not from ANE.
@@Viso333 The Eastern Hunter Gatherers are 75% ANE and 25% WHG, EHG is directly responsible for the R1 Haplogroups in Europeans, they contributed 50% to the DNA of the Indo-Europeans, the British or the Scottish have 20% DNA ANE, in Scandinavia there was a more recent wave of Siberians, closely related to Nganasan, who carried the Uralic languages. Other populations with ANE DNA are the Iranians and the people of Central Asia. Their DNA Iranian is derived from CHG, but CHG themselves are a mixture of Dzudzuana and ANE.
I knew it! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sámi (Finland and Norway) has NEVER any connections with Mongolians.
Edit : Hyva Hyva~
Why you dont like mongols
@@WassupdudeeThis truth does not mean that he does not like mongols.
Of course , they have connection with mongoloid people
These tests do not work for sami at all because test maker does not probably know that we exist and also its meant to show ancestry of modern locations not origin of the ancestry thousands of years ago. But yes our asian ancestry is from siberia not from mongolia
Finno-Ugrian+Mongolian=Sami
european women+Siberian Turkic men=Slavic,ugric and Scytihan 😂
@@azizyigido Hittite aziz u are not turkic 😂
@@barguttobed I'm Somalian🤗
@@mybiscuit4680
They are Uralics mixed with Mongol/Tuvan Turks.
Reindeer herding is a practice of the Tuvan Turks of Siberia, and Northern Mongolia.
@@ShiningGalaxy01 they never mixed with tuvans…
Not indigenous. Also from your videos it looks like that Mesoamerican component is ANE.
What is ANE?
@@SK-nw4ig The Ancient North Eurasians - a genetically identifiable population that came from Siberia and left a genetic mark that can still be seen today. I think from memory (which can be faulty) people who bear most overall ANE similarity are Amerindians.
@@user-ys5xy3um9o thank you!
I wonder who are you to claim that they are not indigenous because of the ANE component? The Sami have existed since the times when mammoths were hunted, that means long before the Europeans existed.Europeans are barely 6k old, and the Sami are like 30k old. Why do you say they are not native? Just because you say so.
They are not indigenous to northern Scandinavia. They came later
Among all ethnicities, it has the largest mix of Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers, with 18% mix. Other ethnicities in Scandinavia, such as the Norwegians or the Swedes, only have 10% SHG. Most of the DNA of the Scandinavians derives from the Corded Ware culture in the Baltic mixed with the Bell Beaker culture belonging to the European Farmers.
The European farmers of the Bell Beaker culture are predominantly Anatolians mixed with Western Hunter Gatherers, the Bell Beaker Culture was in the Northeast with the Baltic and Russia being its point of diffusion, Bell Beaker is a mixture of peoples from the Pontic Steppe or Proto-Indo-Europeans ( Ukraine, Southern Russia, part of Kazakhstan). Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers are characterized by having olive skin with light eyes and dark hair, according to genetic models.
The mitochondrial DNA of the Sami is U5b1, a maternal lineage corresponding to the Scandinavian Hunter Gatherers and the paternal lineage is N1a1 corresponding to the Siberian Indigenous, more precisely of the Nganasan type.
Oh my brothers. Central asian+inuit is Turkish algoritms 🤣
Kiss you much
@@barguttobed man stop with the mongolian propaganda, turks came before mongolians stfu please.
@@selahattinkaskc8668 get out shithead little donkey.
@@barguttobed it's not you matter yellow race
@@Ersen_abiniz if you problem old man? Don’t you see it was very old comments?
@@barguttobed old man 😂😂😂 how old are my nephew?
It is a people of Turkic origin.
No Uralic and relatives with turkic people
“Central Asia” on Myheritage has nothing to do with Turks
I guess it’s just a mix of European and Asian DNA.
Most of finougrian people have it
@@allstar9622 central asia is turkic asian.
European/Asian dna mix in my heritage is West asian.
@@vitormrmr west asia definitely iranic and Caucasian BOZO
Definitely have nothing to do with Turkish nor Turkic people, cry
Ancient Northen People. Y haplogroup is N，close to O
North East Asians gaped
welcome TÜRK brother...
Siberian Turkic nomads🤗
Somali
R3t4rded yigido
@@bunurmaini9158Somali is better than Indonesian gypsys
@@azizyigido Siberian(yes) Turkic(no)
@@barguttobed Siberian:Turkic,no Tungusic,chines(mongols)