Ya Muqallib al-quloob thabbit qalbi 'ala deenik يَا مُقَلِّبَ الْقُلُوبِ ثَبِّتْ قَلْبِى عَلَى دِينِكَ “O Controller of hearts, make my heart firm in Your religion.”
Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented. My position is that *_I currently have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._* And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 10 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that a particular god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument which _concludes_ there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating the verity of such a claim. If any of the following facts were to be contravened at a later time by evidence, experience, or sound argument, I would THEN have good reason to acknowledge such a reality. 1. I personally have never observed a god. 2. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god. 3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity. 4. I have never encountered any _valid_ logical argument, which also introduced demonstrably true premises that lead deductively to an inevitable conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality. 5. Of the many logical syllogisms I have examined arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain a formal or informal logical fallacy or a premise that can not be demonstrated to be true. 6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon. 7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._ 8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event. 9. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed has *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity. 10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as _falsifiable._ ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any particular god. I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._* I welcome any cordial response. Peace.
I would love to give you the answer but in comments nah it sould be physical talk and will explain everything and misconceptions and even though will provide you a logical proof for existence of God alhamdulilah ❤️
@gkinguk NO. Of course not. But your objection is irrational and RIDICULOUS. Are you stating he WASN'T observable to others at the time he was alive? Yes or no.
jesus these guys with there multi-universe theories...bend over backwards into a pretzel to just try and make a fantastical claim that there are actually Billions of Universes and they are all wild and chaos but we happen to be in the lucky one in which we can wake up, day after day after day in the calmest most stable of environment - is just a lucky diceroll of smashing molecules. Its really funny how quickly seemingly rational men will go to Dr Strange and Marvel as some sort of scientific canon
day after day after day in the calmest most stable of environment" so if other universes exist........until we investigate those universes, we can't say that ours is the most stable or calmest. We don't know that, so it's silly to claim it.
@@scottholder4431 That was HIS claim -that we live in the lucky or stable Universe -not mine. To say there is even more than one Universe is a huge leap and there is no real science to back it -just hypotheticals. We can observe that 99.9999999% of the know Universe is chaos and totally unsuitable for what we have as "comfortable life" -so use that as your measuring stick for "luck".
@@froggyluv they are stuck between infinite regress and appeal to necessity. They cant escape the loop. Whether there are billion or trillion they do not escape process of initialisation.
Nice to see Zeeshan giving dawah to Benedict Cumberbatch. Masha'Allah.
Who is Zeeshan?
@@nugr46anteng93 guy with the beard
ahahahahahahah
Thanks!
Ya Muqallib al-quloob thabbit qalbi 'ala deenik
يَا مُقَلِّبَ الْقُلُوبِ ثَبِّتْ قَلْبِى عَلَى دِينِكَ
“O Controller of hearts, make my heart firm in Your religion.”
Alhamdullallah
Surely they have no certainty
Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented. My position is that *_I currently have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._*
And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 10 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that a particular god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument which _concludes_ there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating the verity of such a claim. If any of the following facts were to be contravened at a later time by evidence, experience, or sound argument, I would THEN have good reason to acknowledge such a reality.
1. I personally have never observed a god.
2. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god.
3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity.
4. I have never encountered any _valid_ logical argument, which also introduced demonstrably true premises that lead deductively to an inevitable conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality.
5. Of the many logical syllogisms I have examined arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain a formal or informal logical fallacy or a premise that can not be demonstrated to be true.
6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon.
7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._
8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event.
9. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed has *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity.
10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as _falsifiable._
ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any particular god.
I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._*
I welcome any cordial response. Peace.
have you observed your great great grandfather? that must mean he doesn't exist right
@@gkinguk test
I would love to give you the answer but in comments nah it sould be physical talk and will explain everything and misconceptions and even though will provide you a logical proof for existence of God alhamdulilah ❤️
@gkinguk NO. Of course not. But your objection is irrational and RIDICULOUS. Are you stating he WASN'T observable to others at the time he was alive? Yes or no.
@inamhere6787 So, do you believe I am _rationally justified_ in my position of atheism?
Сделайте жалобу на мошенников представляющихся женщинами из Емена
jesus these guys with there multi-universe theories...bend over backwards into a pretzel to just try and make a fantastical claim that there are actually Billions of Universes and they are all wild and chaos but we happen to be in the lucky one in which we can wake up, day after day after day in the calmest most stable of environment - is just a lucky diceroll of smashing molecules. Its really funny how quickly seemingly rational men will go to Dr Strange and Marvel as some sort of scientific canon
there are actually Billions of Universes"
I bet he's not saying THERE ARE billions of universes, but that it's possible.
day after day after day in the calmest most stable of environment"
so if other universes exist........until we investigate those universes, we can't say that ours is the most stable or calmest. We don't know that, so it's silly to claim it.
@@scottholder4431 There is Zero proof of that - thats Marvel Comics level speculation
@@scottholder4431 That was HIS claim -that we live in the lucky or stable Universe -not mine. To say there is even more than one Universe is a huge leap and there is no real science to back it -just hypotheticals. We can observe that 99.9999999% of the know Universe is chaos and totally unsuitable for what we have as "comfortable life" -so use that as your measuring stick for "luck".
@@froggyluv they are stuck between infinite regress and appeal to necessity. They cant escape the loop. Whether there are billion or trillion they do not escape process of initialisation.
Pakistan Mob Attack On Christian Family😔😔in Sargodha,. Pakistan,.😔
May Allah protect innocent family😔😔in Pakistan,
Countries have laws. Respect them.
@@TheLion377
Pakistan stop kidnapped and killed innocent family😔
May Allah protect innocent family😔in Pakistan