Largest Armies in the World 1820-2022 WW1, WW2

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 28. 05. 2022
  • Which countries have the largest military? In this video we compare the size of every country’s military personnel in each year for the period 1820 to 2022. Military personnel are defined as troops under the command of the national government and held ready for combat. Troops in the reserves, colonial troops, irregular forces such as civil defense units, frontier guards, gendarmerie, carabinieri, cossacks and other quasi-military units are not included.
    During times of war, a country will increase the spending of its military and the size of its military. This pattern has been seen for centuries. Russo-Japanese War, American Civil War, Russian Civil War, Chinese Civil War, WW1, WW2, Vietnam War - during all of these times, either through additional government allocation or through drafting, the countries at war would increase their military sizes.
    Watch on and take an adventure through centuries of history and wars to witness the size and scale of the largest armies in the world from 1820 to today.
    Data source: NMC (CINC) .
    I use Alien Art Charts to make those videos, use this link alienart.io/?referer=626917e1... to make similar videos as mine.
    .
    .
    ww1
    ww2
    russia ukraine war
    military
    .
    .
    Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, Music, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
    Reference:
    support.google.com/youtube/th...
    www.multiplechronicconditions...
    bit.ly/3l8GUbc
    Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976:
    www.copyright.gov/fair-use/mo...
    www.copyright.gov/title17/92c...
    1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them).
    2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
    3)It is not transformative in nature.

Komentáře • 10K

  • @alfredthegreat9543
    @alfredthegreat9543 Před rokem +5727

    Would be interesting to see one based on the % of the population of each country in the army.

    • @ruchijain7495
      @ruchijain7495 Před rokem +406

      Yes that would be a more accurate way of comparison

    • @alfredthegreat9543
      @alfredthegreat9543 Před rokem +49

      @nerdzoid Yeah that's now but I meant the times covered by the video.

    • @nishantmaderna6295
      @nishantmaderna6295 Před rokem +30

      @nessy i don't even know half of nations from them. I would prefer the video. 😂

    • @nishantmaderna6295
      @nishantmaderna6295 Před rokem +14

      @nessy i know most of the nations in the video. I said about the nations which are in ur comment.

    • @Jeremydatliam
      @Jeremydatliam Před rokem +59

      pretty sure at some points in WW1. 25% of Bulgaria was in the army

  • @Disorder2312
    @Disorder2312 Před rokem +3041

    Remember that Army size doesn't necessarily mean Army power and capabilities. In peace time it mostly means that they're mobilizing more troops than others.
    Edit: Since a lot of people seem to have misunderstood my comment, and i'm just tired of seeing such replies. Why do you all completely ignore the part when i said "in peace time"? I never claimed that army size doesn't matter in wаr.
    🤷‍♂

    • @comparisonthinking9536
      @comparisonthinking9536 Před rokem

      Us vs China Country Comparison >> czcams.com/video/3hTQRQKOrvw/video.html

    • @cc8565
      @cc8565 Před rokem +134

      @ShyRIBoyy yep. And equipment

    • @user-pd6fj8nx1o
      @user-pd6fj8nx1o Před rokem +38

      a good leadership is what needed first

    • @HarutHajin
      @HarutHajin Před rokem +36

      USSR won only with Army power 30 million against 1 million German's made sense.

    • @HarutHajin
      @HarutHajin Před rokem

      @@Disorder2312 That is true and do not spread paid books or history in to LOGIC and FACTS ... USSR killed more then 14 million people from Armenia , Georgia , Azerbayjan , Kazakhistan , Uzbekistan , Ukraine , Belarus , Tajjikistan , Turkmenistan , Kyrgyzistan , Chechniya , Daghestan , Cherkesia , Ossetia , Alania, Tataristan , Bashkiria and more and with 30 million won German's 1 million .

  • @sarthak.16
    @sarthak.16 Před 7 měsíci +378

    The growth of india in every sector after independence is tremendous

    • @rakesharamaiah2737
      @rakesharamaiah2737 Před 6 měsíci +58

      We need to thanks to Soviet union/ Russia giving us technology also protected during 1971 war from USA,
      Lots guys really hardworking,
      I think it's active army number taken, reserve army number taken, for 1.4 billion it's very less, but very soon India will have very big army personnel, also new technology

    • @kordellswoffer1520
      @kordellswoffer1520 Před 5 měsíci +9

      Not really as that wasn’t after independence but within the last 50 years.

    • @USViper
      @USViper Před 5 měsíci +1

      But they can't stop their people from defecating in the streets... lol

    • @user-py4yn5oy8u
      @user-py4yn5oy8u Před 5 měsíci +6

      Сколько денег тратится на военные бюджеты, можно было вылечить всех людей, и накормить всех

    • @RajivKumar-xp9qn
      @RajivKumar-xp9qn Před 5 měsíci +17

      @@user-py4yn5oy8u umm... Actually India doesn't spend much on army... Despite being the most populous country, it never once had the highest number of soldiers in the whole video...

  • @Sans_OO5
    @Sans_OO5 Před 7 měsíci +22

    thanks for making this video, I can feel how hard it is❤

  • @kekseze3990
    @kekseze3990 Před rokem +516

    Russia when peace: what army? i only have 600k troops
    Russia when war: DAMN I NEED TO FORCE 10 MIL CIVILIANS INTO MY ARMY

    • @nagibatel9996
      @nagibatel9996 Před rokem +9

      True

    • @bigvinnie3
      @bigvinnie3 Před rokem

      @@ali.hassanmir Russia is a bad boy

    • @islamisthetruewaytogod6812
      @islamisthetruewaytogod6812 Před rokem

      Hello ^^ ! Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time.
      Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them).
      Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI)
      Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy.
      Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful.
      Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI)
      Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).
      Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning!
      Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures.
      Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement.
      It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them.
      (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad)
      Salam (Peace).

    • @minhthutrinhngoc5171
      @minhthutrinhngoc5171 Před rokem +90

      He’s just making a joke man. No one said Russia was a villain tho. Although they’ve always been famous for their large armies.

    • @andys977
      @andys977 Před rokem +95

      It's pretty reasonable.
      The land border of Russia is giant, so it requires a lot of men to protect it.
      While not in the state of war, a large army becomes a budget eater for no reason.
      Moreover, Russia always had a mandatory conscription, so there always was a pretty large well prepared reserve. And I haven't said that about military component of FSAI lessons yet))

  • @arizonashane
    @arizonashane Před 9 měsíci +312

    The best part is when the Russian Empire is replaced by the... Empire of Russia.

    • @Vadim_Geenko
      @Vadim_Geenko Před 9 měsíci +17

      Hahah, точно 😂

    • @bdleo300
      @bdleo300 Před 3 měsíci +16

      I kinda like black-yellow-white flag more

    • @SenSei_ANKIT_JUYAL
      @SenSei_ANKIT_JUYAL Před 2 měsíci +7

      I was in shock where tf Russia empire gone 🥺.. later I looked empire of Russia I felt relieved 😂.. than again it's gone, came up Soviet union 😂 than again Russia itself.. it was accurate ❤

    • @Nipplehook
      @Nipplehook Před měsícem +3

      It was the best period for Russia...and "they" ruined it @@bdleo300

    • @user-pl1dc3jp3u
      @user-pl1dc3jp3u Před měsícem +2

      нет

  • @AnimatedWarMapper
    @AnimatedWarMapper Před měsícem +5

    Great content! Keep up the awesome work!

  • @DigitalMarketing-kv6rr
    @DigitalMarketing-kv6rr Před 8 měsíci +49

    when you practice peace with other nations, you maintain your stable rank as India did for almost two to three decades. Salute to India

    • @solar8446
      @solar8446 Před 7 měsíci +8

      The stable status of a colonial country with a poor population that is being killed by trains? It's better to fight for resources and space.

    • @sandeepratra5726
      @sandeepratra5726 Před 6 měsíci +13

      ​@@solar8446 कोन हो तुम और कहां से आते हैं तेरे जैसे ना समझ लोग 😂

    • @aliencrackgrunt
      @aliencrackgrunt Před 5 měsíci +5

      ​@@sandeepratra5726You have humiliated them, mad respect.

    • @Auror2k05
      @Auror2k05 Před 5 měsíci

      ​@@solar8446 Gaand mein bahut badi aag lag gaye shayad. Thoda burnol laga le 😂

  • @bvbdortmund4809
    @bvbdortmund4809 Před rokem +1697

    My great grandfather was a volunteer in the Bulgarian army in WW1. During that period around 980 thousand man were moblized which is crazy number for such a small country. Almost every man from the age gap 18-50 joined the army. He was later captured during the battle for Dobruja by the Russians and held as war prisoner. After his release he passed away from stomach disease which I cant remember. Love and peace to all nations around the globe war is horrible thing 🩶🌍

    • @___NeedNT___VDK125
      @___NeedNT___VDK125 Před rokem +77

      Наверное его взяли, когда произошел "Брусиловский прорыв"

    • @baxronazimov1882
      @baxronazimov1882 Před rokem

      before all countries were afraid of USSR. After 1992, they don't consider the Russian Federation, and they are itching for America again. if the USSR was restored, the whole world would be afraid of the USSR again, and America would die. the largest country in the world, the strongest country, the richest country, the most economically powerful country, would be the USSR

    • @dr.peanutsheesh6176
      @dr.peanutsheesh6176 Před rokem +14

      @@___NeedNT___VDK125 yeah.... Maybe

    • @osamanogoom1583
      @osamanogoom1583 Před rokem +11

      @@___NeedNT___VDK125 Brusilov offensive ?

    • @munirmamadvafoev1208
      @munirmamadvafoev1208 Před rokem +79

      The best part I read is about love and peace to all nations 👍
      This is capitalism that creates wars! Remove private property over means of production and all mankind will meet the golden age! Remember that all workers all over the world are brothers and sisters, no matter what language they speak and how different they are by appearance!
      Happy New Year, dear friend!

  • @nathanc939
    @nathanc939 Před rokem +839

    You realise how fast an army can expand when you see armies grow 5 to 7 times their size in 2 years, in an era where most nations spent signifucantly more on their armies to start with. You probably could expect a 10 times increase today for most of Europe if they ended up in a serious war.
    This makes you think about how ridiculous shit might get real soon if WW3 breaks out.

    • @laisphinto6372
      @laisphinto6372 Před rokem

      you forgot that the population was willing to go to war. today no way in hell people would join the Bundeswehr to fight for Germany patriotism is beaten out of germans

    • @aimxdy8680
      @aimxdy8680 Před rokem +67

      That’s just europe, America went from 300,000 and shots up to 12,000,000. America and europe would fight together so that’s like almost 30 million american troops.

    • @nathanc939
      @nathanc939 Před rokem +50

      @@aimxdy8680 Well, back then, the USA spent significantly less than the Europeans on its military. Basically, today the USA invest more in its military than before WW1 or in the 1930's.
      This is why I did not use it as a metric, on the other hand, most of Europe barelly spend on their military today, while it spent much more back then.

    • @aimxdy8680
      @aimxdy8680 Před rokem +38

      @@nathanc939 USA also had a lot lower population, USA had 130 million now it has almost 350 million. Europe population only increased by 1.2x, USA population increased like 2.5x.

    • @jimboramba
      @jimboramba Před rokem +108

      The most ridiculous part of a world war today would be the amount of green purple and pink haired soldiers compared to the last 2

  • @thomasfx3190
    @thomasfx3190 Před 3 měsíci

    It’s an entertaining view of the growth & shrink of various countries armies. But the smoothing done for the animation makes it appear that the changes in the number of troops was linear over time when it actually accelerated / decelerated rapidly over short spaces of time, i.e. - mustering out in 1866, 60,000 killed at the Somme in one day, etc.

  • @MsIHSI
    @MsIHSI Před 3 měsíci +6

    The progress of the Turks without leaving among the 15 most crowded armies from the beginning to the end of the video is also a remarkable detail.

  • @tinyrhysherbert7537
    @tinyrhysherbert7537 Před rokem +866

    It would be cool to see one from the 1600’s-1850’s seeing, the massive spikes from the British during the Seven Years War, the Americans showing up during 1775-1783, and Revolutionary and Napoleonic France’s rise and fall from 1789-1815.

    • @art_means_artificial
      @art_means_artificial Před rokem +10

      Great that Russia has got SARMAT! the strongest Guardian angel

    • @dulkyd
      @dulkyd Před rokem +2

      yes

    • @justsomerandomguy449
      @justsomerandomguy449 Před rokem +11

      America never showed In 1775 that was British America.

    • @tinyrhysherbert7537
      @tinyrhysherbert7537 Před rokem +17

      @@justsomerandomguy449 They existed as rebels before the Revolution began in 1775, and the Continental Army was established the same year, which grouped up all the militia under one force. It was British America, but the Army still existed in British America.

    • @Uahmedtahaalnady
      @Uahmedtahaalnady Před rokem +3

      he forgot to count egypt in 1800s 😁😁so how egypt will fight the Turks

  • @riteshshaw9504
    @riteshshaw9504 Před rokem +738

    It's just ridiculous when you think the british with an army strength of around 100k to 200k on an average (excluding British Indian army) was able to rule the Indian subcontinent for over 200years
    The British Indian army (which consisted of Indians ) played a key role to help British govern India in the first place

    • @halfaspolish
      @halfaspolish Před rokem +15

      я не знаю что ты не хочешь со мной не хочешь со своей женой

    • @alexisanto0018
      @alexisanto0018 Před rokem +10

      They don't have any enemies

    • @tide9026
      @tide9026 Před rokem +136

      India was divided and scattered plus a power vacuum which rendered a bad chain of command at that time, and this is why the Brits colonized it, the circumstance matters a lot in a military campaign. You can see that India got its independence because of these same Brits getting screwed up in WW2.

    • @SergeantArchDornan999
      @SergeantArchDornan999 Před rokem +94

      @@halfaspolish "I don't know what you don't want with me you don't want with your wife"???
      I think I had a Stroke reading that.

    • @halfaspolish
      @halfaspolish Před rokem +3

      @@SergeantArchDornan999 да да ты не знаешь как это сделать в домашних условиях из дома не будет в порядке возрастания

  • @retro1853
    @retro1853 Před 4 měsíci +11

    A suggestion, the year information should be somewhere close to top-right, as the reader usually wants to hover on progress and year together. Also, any major events should be highlighted in bold to catch the attention of users that a new player has entered the arena.

  • @mauijttewaal
    @mauijttewaal Před 8 měsíci +1

    Utterly fascinating!

  • @Nostoc_29
    @Nostoc_29 Před rokem +590

    India = 1.4 million active soldiers + 3.5 million reserved soldiers

    • @islamisthetruewaytogod6812
      @islamisthetruewaytogod6812 Před rokem +1

      Hello ^^ ! Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time.
      Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them).
      Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI)
      Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy.
      Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful.
      Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI)
      Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).
      Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning!
      Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures.
      Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement.
      It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them.
      (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad)
      Salam (Peace).

    • @moonshadowsong
      @moonshadowsong Před rokem +39

      Wtf is lakh?

    • @Nostoc_29
      @Nostoc_29 Před rokem +131

      @@moonshadowsong 14 Lakh = 1.4 millions, 35 lakh =3.5 millions

    • @ratnaprasadnaidubasa9407
      @ratnaprasadnaidubasa9407 Před rokem +19

      Unofficially more dude

    • @WhatIsLove170
      @WhatIsLove170 Před rokem +30

      @@moonshadowsong 1 Lakh = 100 thousand

  • @kadenoconnor5096
    @kadenoconnor5096 Před rokem +363

    During World War II, a total of about 13.6 million soldiers served in the German Army.

    • @brianlong2334
      @brianlong2334 Před rokem +95

      18million served at some point but at it's peak 11million at one time.

    • @Garbagi
      @Garbagi Před rokem +9

      😱

    • @vexversaa239
      @vexversaa239 Před rokem +52

      thats actually a lot when you consider the population of germany

    • @brianlong2334
      @brianlong2334 Před rokem +49

      @@vexversaa239 Germany had a male population of about 22million between the ages of 11 to 65 in ww2.
      USA had about 30million
      USSR 40million
      Japanese 18million
      UK, France and Italy all had about 11million.

    • @Freemedia.ru21
      @Freemedia.ru21 Před rokem +11

      В СССР воевало все мужское население так что это более 40 миллионов

  • @tymegabucks9210
    @tymegabucks9210 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Wish we could see one based on the overall strength of the armies throughout history instead of just their numbers (artillery, cavalry, intelligence, troops, etc.)

  • @user-bz1ju5fw8j
    @user-bz1ju5fw8j Před 2 měsíci +3

    3:57 Bulgaria was insane - 4th largest army in the world, despite being just for a moment. Having more than Great Britain, China and 3x USA and almost as much as France makes me feel real proud of the brave men, who fought for the liberation and unification of my country in the summer of 1913 🇧🇬

  • @Microscop404
    @Microscop404 Před rokem +423

    Как бы высоко ты не летал, помни, что когда-то, в 1910-м году, Эфиопия имела армию больше, чем у США

    • @Qwerty10836
      @Qwerty10836 Před rokem +63

      Русский урааа

    • @lucianadrian9098
      @lucianadrian9098 Před rokem

      Russia should be atbthe bottom. Poor and corrupt army...probably on 30 th place in the world.

    • @francoisvalois
      @francoisvalois Před rokem +22

      Но наша страна сильно не падала)

    • @Dug184
      @Dug184 Před rokem +12

      @@francoisvalois nor did it rise much

    • @abrahamflores7612
      @abrahamflores7612 Před rokem +39

      Aún así Estados Unidos era más poderoso que Etiopía. Jajajaja. No importa la cantidad sino la calidad.

  • @lifes40123
    @lifes40123 Před rokem +239

    If anyone's wondering, in the mid 1800s, numerous rebellions and civil wars broke out in the Qing Dynasty like the Taiping and Dzungar rebellions. Hundreds of thousands of imperial troops, conscripts, and militias were called to arms.

    • @Vrykron
      @Vrykron Před rokem +2

      Thx

    • @shahbazsheikh3545
      @shahbazsheikh3545 Před 11 měsíci +2

      Thanks - I was wondering why they needed such a large army at that point in history.

    • @ThiefOfNavarre
      @ThiefOfNavarre Před 10 měsíci +1

      That makes alot more sense in context!

    • @PavelSharapov
      @PavelSharapov Před 10 měsíci +1

      И в конце концов, китайцы захватили почти всё царство цин, то есть, манчжуров. А империя цин распалась на множество более мелких стран, вроде Китая, Монголии, Тибета...

    • @tauslou5793
      @tauslou5793 Před 2 měsíci

      The Qing Dynasty originated in northeast china Because there was no general term for the country at that time.

  • @mg6641
    @mg6641 Před 2 měsíci +3

    Very interesting 😊❤.

  • @ivorhirst344
    @ivorhirst344 Před 6 měsíci +4

    Size doesn't matter,various Countries inflate there own strength, its about having well trained,technically capable forces that learn quickly on the Battlefield..

  • @roscoeschickennwaffles7567
    @roscoeschickennwaffles7567 Před rokem +101

    It’s slightly ominous seeing Germany kicked off the rankings after WW1 and see them move back up in the 1930’s knowing what was to come

    • @lonemaus562
      @lonemaus562 Před 11 měsíci +4

      Oh no here we go again lmao

  • @gm2407
    @gm2407 Před 10 měsíci +84

    For those wondering national service in the UK began during WWII and the last conscripts of that system were 1963. It was volunteer ever since.

    • @KOVAC966
      @KOVAC966 Před 8 měsíci +5

      Conscription ended in the US just 12 years later but it’d be reinstated if the country was in a national emergency

    • @rakesharamaiah2737
      @rakesharamaiah2737 Před 6 měsíci

      How many Indian army guys participate in 1st and 2nd world war, they have mentioned as UK army... that's why it's showed big, if you remove that nothing UK has

    • @gm2407
      @gm2407 Před 6 měsíci

      @@rakesharamaiah2737 I couldn't tell you numbers without having to look it up. Indians of course did serve in the Indian army with officers having served 1 year as a sub-altern in the British army (I don't know when that arrangement ended or if it continued until independence). Wikipedia gives a strenth of 573,000 men in 1918 up from 215,000 in 1914. In the second world war the army numbered 205,000 at the start and had 2.5 million peak at one point during the war. Considered the largest all volunteer force in history. With cira 87,000 soldiers dieing during the conflict and 30 Victoria crosses awarded.
      Seperately wikipedia says 3.5 million men and women had served in the British Army during the second world war with circa 720,000 cassualties throughout the conflict. So I can assume that any totals given in the video would include the British army and all other armies under the imperial sovereignty. But it has also been a while since I watched this video.

    • @rakesh928
      @rakesh928 Před 2 měsíci

      ​@gm2407 basically you enslaved people across continents, made them fight your wars and then call it largest volunteer force?
      ironical? or just supremacy that everything belonged to you?

    • @cpj93070
      @cpj93070 Před měsícem

      @@rakesharamaiah2737Wrong you 🤡this is British solders, not including there empire numbers.

  • @JiggaMan1297
    @JiggaMan1297 Před měsícem +2

    That WW1 spike 😳 the whole world went crazy

  • @skeletalwreck
    @skeletalwreck Před 12 dny

    This is fantastic to watch while really baked.

  • @gamingshowerthoughts9723
    @gamingshowerthoughts9723 Před rokem +80

    It's somehow more ominous that Nazi Germany doesn't just teleport to the top like happens with some countries as they change names/regimes. It creeps up slowly enough you absolutely cannot miss it.

    • @Glo0ze
      @Glo0ze Před rokem +13

      Well the difference is that with those "teleport to the top" Is that they involve a civil war or the old countries army was already at the top (russian civil war for example). So you have two armies counted under 1 nation's flag (russian empire). but the moment the civil war ends and the new name is instated all those soldier fall under this new flag (soviet union). This did not happen with nazi germany. It was simply a political takeover of the country which became war focused and started increasing military budget. two very different situations

    • @sgx9874
      @sgx9874 Před 6 měsíci +2

      Yeah that's how conscription works...this video makes it seem like armies just pop out of nowhere but thats just misleading.
      When full mobilization is enacted and every male aged 18-45 is conscripted. Then the numbers inflate drastically.

  • @Lex-lw9bb
    @Lex-lw9bb Před rokem +136

    Watching colorful bars move around was unexpectedly exciting. The WWII time period was like watching an action movie.

    • @AleksanderAleksandr
      @AleksanderAleksandr Před rokem +4

      Скорее фильма ужасов.

    • @KonDi-uh4nx
      @KonDi-uh4nx Před 10 měsíci +4

      ЭТО ОЧЕНЬ СТРАШНО,ВОЙНА ЭТО Смерть И БОЛЬ-ТЕБЯ И ТВОИХ БЛИЗКИХ ,НЕ ДАЙ БОГ Мировой ВОЙНЫ 😢😢😢😢😢❤

  • @AsifRoxittude
    @AsifRoxittude Před měsícem +2

    Big army means big responsibility on managing it, it requires a lot of budget to manage it, when it's peace time countries reduce these numbers

  • @Sandipan971
    @Sandipan971 Před 7 měsíci +49

    From zero to hero.. love amy Bharat 🇮🇳

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 Před 6 měsíci +6

      It's army size. Not that impressive achievement

    • @midhunraj1038
      @midhunraj1038 Před 6 měsíci +3

      ​@@vatsal7640 are you funny 🤣🤣

    • @vatsal7640
      @vatsal7640 Před 6 měsíci +1

      @@midhunraj1038 what?

    • @prathamhadap
      @prathamhadap Před 5 měsíci +1

      nice

    • @lazyone9114
      @lazyone9114 Před 5 měsíci +3

      It was always a hero but Britishers ruled on it for sometime

  • @VB4VB4
    @VB4VB4 Před rokem +30

    4:17 here comes ussr

    • @Thehorrorboat
      @Thehorrorboat Před rokem +5

      Glory to the ussr even though it collapsed it still had many allies like antigua and barbuda taiwan belarus (already annexed by ussr) and dr congo

  • @forryko9504
    @forryko9504 Před 9 měsíci +150

    I am astonished by the immense growth of the Bulgarian 🇧🇬 army in about 1912, especially taking into account that the country does not have such a huge population. Can you imagine the percentage of inhabitants in the army during that time?
    Oh my stars! 😮

    • @franciscomanuelteruelgutie6790
      @franciscomanuelteruelgutie6790 Před 9 měsíci +4

      First Balkan War.

    • @TheArthas2
      @TheArthas2 Před 8 měsíci

      Believe they mobilized 25% of their population

    • @user-db9iz4xk6l
      @user-db9iz4xk6l Před 8 měsíci +1

      IT only shows that the injustices towards our nation could bring miracles like these (like 4 hardly to say countries doing genocide to occupied land which bulgarians live)

    • @lomax343
      @lomax343 Před 6 měsíci

      According to The Sleepwalkers by Christopher Clark, around 30% of Bulgarian males were mobilised during the First Balkan War of 1912-3.

    • @lomax343
      @lomax343 Před 6 měsíci

      @@user-db9iz4xk6l True. And the Bulgarians were as bad.

  • @el_chico1313
    @el_chico1313 Před 6 měsíci +2

    1:52 as a half paraguayan i feel proud to have my country been mentioned in the top 10 at some point in history😊

  • @geetanshgohlan
    @geetanshgohlan Před 5 měsíci +2

    The change in army size in ww2 was so chaotic 😅

  • @superchiptunetv2291
    @superchiptunetv2291 Před rokem +51

    1:20 russian empire: ⬇️
    empire of russia: ⬆️

  • @AndinoKiwi
    @AndinoKiwi Před rokem +24

    Have you looked into the number of troops deployed during the "War of the Pacific," the conflict that saw Bolivia and Peru facing Chile between 1879 and 1884? According to Chilean stats, around 70,000 Chilean troops were mobilized at some point.

    • @cadentopia
      @cadentopia Před rokem +5

      I don't think that the numbers were that high
      Maybe 30,000 at most in Chilean soldier
      But at the same time they also recognize the Triple-Alliance war with Brasil / Argentina / Paraguay

  • @erkan.0.
    @erkan.0. Před 8 měsíci +2

    It's funny that Turkey is always in the middle of the world rankings. Whatever problems they have, they have always given importance to the army and kept it constant.

  • @LiveYourLifeWithJoy
    @LiveYourLifeWithJoy Před 5 měsíci +3

    So much lives and money wasted. For what, greed and hate?
    People think armies and weapons are nice, but they are meant to harm, to kill. Then they get surprised when they actually work. Its really crazy.
    Imagine where we could be in so many ways, if that energy had been invested in improving our lives instead of making hell on Earth.
    We have to learn something with this 🙏

  • @robiejumawan8835
    @robiejumawan8835 Před rokem +277

    Mass conscription during both world war raise the number of soldiers to more than ten million. If WW3 happen, the Indian-Chinese border would really see the highest casualties after the war( if nukes will not be used).

    • @Chadmeleon
      @Chadmeleon Před rokem +70

      They won't fight. Relatively far more peaceful than Europeans.

    • @Uahmedtahaalnady
      @Uahmedtahaalnady Před rokem +6

      he forgot to count egypt in 1800s 😁😁so how egypt will fight the Turks

    • @user-rr1tc3jt1z
      @user-rr1tc3jt1z Před rokem

      @@Chadmeleon Their pacifism is a complete lie, they continue to actively trade with Russia, although it has unleashed a great war, kills people and destroys the world order, the destruction of which will lead to many wars, including in Asia

    • @Chadmeleon
      @Chadmeleon Před rokem

      @@user-rr1tc3jt1z you wish. Asia trades with Russia because they are the new customers. The west are terrible customers. Ukraine is a US / nato puppet that the rest of the world doesn't support. The world order being destroyed is good for the world. The west is garbage.

    • @DhruvPatel-zg1zs
      @DhruvPatel-zg1zs Před rokem

      @@Chadmeleon you never know. China believe in expansion and India doesn't want any change in the boundary of country.

  • @teemup9247
    @teemup9247 Před rokem +54

    Noticed that Finland should gave jumped back on the list in 1941 as the army attacking to liberate lost territories (and maybe gain some) was over 500 000. Some of it was demobilized when the static warfare set in 1942-1944

    • @jakubtomczyk1439
      @jakubtomczyk1439 Před rokem +2

      There are lots of mistakes. I from Poland so I see those about Poland. 1. To 1921 we had Polish soviet war (soviets jump into list after 1922)
      2. When Germany attacked us we have mobilized 1mln soldiers

    • @Slobozanszczina
      @Slobozanszczina Před rokem +3

      @@jakubtomczyk1439 I agree! I am from Russia, but in 1945 we had a 12 million army. There are a number of errors here. I have Polish ancestors on the female line who died from Bandera in the Volyn massacre.

    • @jakubtomczyk1439
      @jakubtomczyk1439 Před rokem +1

      @@Slobozanszczina So I see there arent mistakes only about Poland

    • @baxronazimov1882
      @baxronazimov1882 Před rokem

      before all countries were afraid of USSR. After 1992, they don't consider the Russian Federation, and they are itching for America again. if the USSR was restored, the whole world would be afraid of the USSR again, and America would die. the largest country in the world, the strongest country, the richest country, the most economically powerful country, would be the USSR

    • @user-tk3qn5ho2x
      @user-tk3qn5ho2x Před 11 měsíci +1

      @@jakubtomczyk1439 I guess the source does not actually have the numbers for every year and they interpolate between the years they have the data for. The data from 1917 to 1920 is probably a mess because of WWI and Poland gaining independence. I don't know though how the author missed your army of 1939, it should be very well documented.

  • @healthgod5743
    @healthgod5743 Před 7 měsíci +11

    最高に分かりやすく面白いです。ありがとうございます。

    • @user-th1sf1uo6z
      @user-th1sf1uo6z Před 2 měsíci

      how many chinese did you kill😅

    • @user-xh4qd8gm8o
      @user-xh4qd8gm8o Před měsícem

      @@user-th1sf1uo6z最大で30万人だそうです。私達は、この負の歴史を絶対に忘れず、繰り返さないようにしなければなりません...

    • @user-ye9vk3ku4l
      @user-ye9vk3ku4l Před měsícem

      @@user-th1sf1uo6z南京事件の死者数って、年々増えてるんですよ。不思議ですね。最初は3〜4万だったのに気づいたら10万、そして今では30万、なんなら100万人を超えると言っている人もいます。「中国が発表してる数字」を信用しない方がいいですよ😊

    • @Larendr
      @Larendr Před měsícem

      ​@@user-th1sf1uo6zこのコメントしている人は殺してないので、聞いても仕方がないですよ

    • @pagb6813
      @pagb6813 Před měsícem

      😷🇨🇳

  • @ond1965
    @ond1965 Před měsícem +1

    In 1938, Czechoslovakia had over 1 200 000 soldiers

  • @topgraph
    @topgraph Před rokem +15

    Military related information is always interesting. Thanks for the useful information.

  • @crewmatepumpandsackboy5996

    3:50
    Bulgaria: Gas Gas Gas

  • @Justmyopinionlol
    @Justmyopinionlol Před 17 dny +1

    it seems to me like army size meant nothing here. Some small countries with small armies were able to achieve so much during the 19th century: Portuguese, Dutch, United States.

  • @roxtor8473
    @roxtor8473 Před měsícem +1

    I don't really like how more and more dictatorships and third world countries are starting to grow their armies, it's scary

  • @madcrusader123
    @madcrusader123 Před rokem +250

    I'd love to see the approximate army sized from year 1.

    • @davidkendrick4453
      @davidkendrick4453 Před rokem +56

      There was no year 0. It went directly from 1 BC to 1 AD. That’s why for example the 21st century started on 1/1/2001.

    • @tinyrhysherbert7537
      @tinyrhysherbert7537 Před rokem +24

      0 doesn’t exist it just became 1 AD after BC finished.

    • @madcrusader123
      @madcrusader123 Před rokem +22

      Okay okay, I understood it when the first guy said it, geez.
      And it's not that impossible to give estimates.

    • @wilcowen6284
      @wilcowen6284 Před rokem

      @@davidkendrick4453 NERD

    • @ikr233
      @ikr233 Před rokem +2

      @@madcrusader123 there was no year 0. 1 AD came after 1 BC.

  • @SaulMLynn
    @SaulMLynn Před 11 měsíci +125

    The US army grew drastically during the Mexican-American War. It should have been visible on the graph for 1847 and 1848. Mexico too had a large army during the conflict.

    • @fredact
      @fredact Před 11 měsíci +10

      And the US numbers in the Civil war seem to also include the CSA numbers.

    • @KilaMother
      @KilaMother Před 11 měsíci +8

      Also during the American Civil War, Mexico was fighting the French Mexico had a large army during that war too.🤔

    • @Meng_moe
      @Meng_moe Před 11 měsíci +3

      the Russia Civil War include USSR and Ukraine's army and China Civil war include all army in China, too

    • @karantikoo9302
      @karantikoo9302 Před 11 měsíci +3

      @@Meng_moe russian civil war is not ukraine vs ussr (if you may be confused)
      ukraine got independent for 1-2 years then most people chose the communist regime after a small invasion (not widespread)

    • @Meng_moe
      @Meng_moe Před 11 měsíci +1

      @@karantikoo9302 I mean the Russia , USSR, and the independent Ukraine, Estonia, Lithuania, and Black Guards

  • @clizardojr
    @clizardojr Před 3 měsíci

    What software do you use to make this animation?

  • @JarethGT
    @JarethGT Před rokem +13

    5:14 Out of nowhere "MURICA!!!!"

  • @shutup2751
    @shutup2751 Před rokem +134

    1.2 million soldiers for iraq in 1990 with a population of just 18 million is insane

    • @dussie920
      @dussie920 Před rokem +13

      What about North-Korea?

    • @nishantmaderna6295
      @nishantmaderna6295 Před rokem +54

      @@dussie920 north korea is already mad.

    • @user-th3nx6zj2f
      @user-th3nx6zj2f Před rokem +9

      Bulgaria pulled the same numbers with 4 million population in 1915.

    • @chrissant6277
      @chrissant6277 Před rokem +3

      @@nishantmaderna6295 NK been mad lmao

    • @Bbouy1HD
      @Bbouy1HD Před rokem +2

      not really. australia had around 1 mil with a 6 million population

  • @sylvester-jb3lj
    @sylvester-jb3lj Před 26 dny +1

    its not how big, but, how well trained, equipped, dedication to the cause etc ...

  • @user-wt1md8pq5z
    @user-wt1md8pq5z Před měsícem +1

    it's disheartening looking at how much war there has been over 200 years.

  • @felipejuanpabloalfonso7917
    @felipejuanpabloalfonso7917 Před rokem +133

    Russia 🇷🇺 in 1869 was huge til the empire disappeared 🤯

    • @FisherVoice
      @FisherVoice Před rokem +16

      Що тоді була хрінь а не армія що зараз.

    • @pepcoq3
      @pepcoq3 Před rokem +51

      @@FisherVoice Украины вообще не было в помине,так что расслабься

    • @FisherVoice
      @FisherVoice Před rokem +15

      @@pepcoq3 Перша письмова згадка про Україну була в 1187 а ось кого точно не було в "помине" так це "росии"

    • @Gerich222
      @Gerich222 Před rokem +48

      @@FisherVoice это тебе укроучебники рассказали?🤣🤣🤣

    • @kostiamarich
      @kostiamarich Před rokem

      @@FisherVoice перша письмова згадка слова "оукраина" - в 15 столітті. Подробніше про це на каналі "Твоя підпільна гуманітарка"

  • @gottalivehappy
    @gottalivehappy Před rokem +94

    I love how this one has accurate flags and army sizes from their region.

    • @heirofhair143
      @heirofhair143 Před rokem +5

      Except for the Kingdom of Poland (1815-1831) which should be featured here as well, since it was not a part of the Russian Empire at the time and had an army big enough to fit here.

    • @kilianfirebolt
      @kilianfirebolt Před rokem +12

      most flags were not entirely accurate, the russian empire flag had a yellow eagle on it, the portugese flag was blue and white and some others

    • @sehu1291
      @sehu1291 Před rokem +2

      Afghanistan flag was different after the taliban

    • @Borushiki_7
      @Borushiki_7 Před rokem +1

      The official flag of Ethiopia was adopted in 1897; it features the green-yellow-red horizontal tricolour with the crowned Lion of Judah at the centre.
      In 1991 the People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front defeated Mengiistu and the socialist emblem was removed.
      The emblem of Ethiopia was added to the centre of the flag in 1996, originally a light blue field it was changed after eight months to dark blue.
      Each colour on the flag has a specific meaning; the green is for land, yellow for peace, red for strength and the blue is for unity. Which is the flag shown above.

    • @cynicalsayonara7169
      @cynicalsayonara7169 Před 3 měsíci

      NEEEEEEEERRRRDD!@@heirofhair143

  • @JohnoLbz6147
    @JohnoLbz6147 Před 7 měsíci

    The UK just seems to always have the right amount never way to many or not enough, they seem to calculate how many are needed quite well. I mean abviously during a war it would be handy to have more.

  • @sanmac9621
    @sanmac9621 Před 18 dny

    in old days wars mostly depend on size of army, now power and technology of army. now soldiers dont go in fields to fight each others by swards. but it always good to have more number it helps in time of natural calamities and riots in countries.

  • @user-gf5fo2iv4v
    @user-gf5fo2iv4v Před rokem +148

    In modern warfare, it is not just the number of troops that determines victory.It also depends on its own equipment level, scientific research capability and logistics capability.

    • @nickbell4984
      @nickbell4984 Před rokem +26

      Well this has also mattered every year that this video covers. Russia may have had 3 and a half million troops to Japan's 300,000 but they still lost the war embarrassingly.

    • @mikorsky_s.92
      @mikorsky_s.92 Před rokem +4

      @@nickbell4984 yes in every year most militarys used the best they could get. Same like now. But if you want to play long: get troops

    • @EpicMalick
      @EpicMalick Před rokem +17

      Like for example South Korea has 599,000 troops and North Korea has 1,280,000 but South Korea will still win

    • @toxichuman208
      @toxichuman208 Před rokem +8

      Israil vs (egypt, syria, urdun, Irak)

    • @kiwibear439
      @kiwibear439 Před rokem +12

      @@EpicMalick nuke = hehe boy

  • @stu8840
    @stu8840 Před rokem +12

    6:48 iran 🇮🇷 was like oo I should not be here

    • @Lusiorange
      @Lusiorange Před rokem +1

      Underrated comment lol

    • @abnbagdad9217
      @abnbagdad9217 Před 9 měsíci

      العراق الرابع عالميا كان هههههه

  • @bychannelcartoon
    @bychannelcartoon Před 18 dny

    nice video

  • @arywibowo1760
    @arywibowo1760 Před 3 měsíci

    Wow you have a good number.. can you share the spreadsheet please..

  • @isepicworthful
    @isepicworthful Před 10 měsíci +13

    Fun fact : Military size doesn't directly affect military strength, most countries could probably take on north Korea if we exclude nukes

    • @airmanmao
      @airmanmao Před 10 měsíci +4

      Russias already a prime example.

    • @joeskintone9752
      @joeskintone9752 Před 10 měsíci +5

      fun fact: Russia is big and troops spreaded on that territories, its about 300k by far in Ukraine right now. North Korea is smaller country and their military strength is gorgeous right now. Don't be fooled by media

    • @svyalinirnhut890
      @svyalinirnhut890 Před 10 měsíci

      Yeah but you also need to keep in mind of the homefront factor. Ukraine had 8 years to prepare for a Russian invasion since 2014 while fighting a civil war in the East. They’ve only started getting mass bulk of Western weapons since 2022. It’s already difficult for Russia.
      Meanwhile North Korea had half a century to build up its defenses and have been getting weapons from China and Russia decades ago.
      If NK invade SK they’d probably lose, but anyone who invade NK would also suffer heavy losses. That’s why Korean peninsula is tied in a perpetual stalemate.

    • @isepicworthful
      @isepicworthful Před 10 měsíci

      @@svyalinirnhut890 Yes but my point is not nk being defensive or not overall, my point is technology and military research matters too rather than just numbers. None can invade north Korea rn because of the threat of nukes anyways

    • @chidoking09
      @chidoking09 Před 2 měsíci +1

      @@svyalinirnhut890South korean population is gonna shrink by half in about 50 years so I don’t think they will survive for long

  • @KarthikAyyalasomayajula
    @KarthikAyyalasomayajula Před rokem +29

    I love how the 4 of the top 5 countries (also the only 5 with over a million troops) are exactly who you'd expect to be the countries with the biggest militaries
    And North Korea

  • @leeklamhijam1112
    @leeklamhijam1112 Před 3 měsíci +2

    Ashoka the Great's army in 250 BCE was more than most of today's country armies

  • @Reedling8319
    @Reedling8319 Před 9 měsíci

    Can you make a Oceanian one plz?

  • @296jacqi
    @296jacqi Před rokem +21

    I wonder what it would look like as a percentage of population. 2 million is a much different number with a country of a billion people vs 300 million, for example. Interesting to watch. Thank you.

    • @suraj001status3
      @suraj001status3 Před rokem

      👍😀

    • @kbikyj2023love
      @kbikyj2023love Před rokem +1

      한국은 5천만명의 인구에 75만명의 군인과 300만명의 예비군이 있다.

    • @R01EIEVCTEFO
      @R01EIEVCTEFO Před rokem

      Like Russia always had many human resources, because there is was 100+ mln people

  • @alias7goldenletters
    @alias7goldenletters Před 10 měsíci +6

    i love the the YOU CALM DOWN NO YOU CALM DOWN aspect

  • @jonathanstempleton7864
    @jonathanstempleton7864 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Would be interesting to see the armies of the East India Trading Company in there

  • @josefsalak558
    @josefsalak558 Před 8 měsíci +1

    the Czechoslovak mobilization in 1938 amounted to 2,000,000 people against Hitler's Germany. That's a huge number relative to population.

  • @Astrokauza
    @Astrokauza Před 11 měsíci +9

    4:37 player China fell off the bicycle

  • @chaosXP3RT
    @chaosXP3RT Před rokem +40

    The US military only got large during times of war until WWII and then it never looked back

    • @usaball3867
      @usaball3867 Před rokem +3

      us i rank 1

    • @_Kropotoff_
      @_Kropotoff_ Před rokem +1

      СССР был сильнее

    • @Vot4er0
      @Vot4er0 Před rokem +6

      @@_Kropotoff_ Развалился без единого выстрела

    • @_Kropotoff_
      @_Kropotoff_ Před rokem +2

      @@Vot4er0 И? Вооружение было лучше.

    • @romanbalandin404
      @romanbalandin404 Před rokem +1

      @@_Kropotoff_ не помогло

  • @FlorinSutu
    @FlorinSutu Před 6 měsíci +1

    2:20 - - During its war for turning its independence from "de facto" to "confirmed in documents", in 1877-1878, Romania mobilized over 125,000 people, of which the operational army was 66,000 soldiers, 12,300 horses and 190 cannons. So, for 1877-1878, Romania is a must in that list.

  • @danmen2000
    @danmen2000 Před 4 měsíci +2

    me impresiona que españa haya tenido un ejercito tan consistente a lo largo del tiempo

  • @4Fixerdave
    @4Fixerdave Před rokem +313

    Things I learned: From the end of WW2, the US and the UK and then all through the Cold War, NATO outnumbered the Soviets. Considering how the scope of WW2 Eastern Front battles dwarfed the Western Front, I had always assumed the Soviets held a strong numerical advantage. Not actually true on the grand scale. Also, as the Cold War ended, it was interesting to see how pretty much all of Europe just dropped off the listing.
    Looking at the numbers now... somehow I suspect S.Korea could do some serious damage.

    • @TheWaynester101
      @TheWaynester101 Před rokem

      south korea is on the verge of a population collapse. its now or never to use their army

    • @4Fixerdave
      @4Fixerdave Před rokem +22

      @@Serphz No, South Korea... on the list right between Iran and Vietnam. And, unlike N. Korea with obsolete equipment, S. Korea has quite the array of weapon systems... and a fairly decent arms industry as well.

    • @Serphz
      @Serphz Před rokem +9

      @@4Fixerdave right, my apologies, i don't know how i missed it

    • @RRRR-jr1gp
      @RRRR-jr1gp Před rokem +9

      The soviets were in Europe, while the Americans had to do an absolutely massive amphibious assaults (also the soviets never fought on 2 fronts, they only attacked Japan after germany was over). Same reason why the us (unless France shot first they used to be quite trigger-happy) would have had to use nukes to keep the soviets from taking over europe and beating them

    • @4Fixerdave
      @4Fixerdave Před rokem +43

      @@RRRR-jr1gp "...would have had to use nukes to keep the soviets from taking over europe..." Yes, that's what I grew up hearing. But, the above chart clearly shows that the US/UK and then NATO fielded a larger army than the Soviets the whole time. Yes, a good chunk of the US forces were in the Pacific dealing with Japan. But, that coupled with the amphibious capability you mentioned, just meant that the Soviets would have ended up in a 2-front war with landings in the Pacific.
      That's why I was surprised. Either the above charts are significantly wrong or the Soviet threat was overblown for budget reasons. I'm suspecting the latter.

  • @joaofelipemendescabral
    @joaofelipemendescabral Před rokem +25

    4:50 nazi germany (1932)

  • @danielt.8573
    @danielt.8573 Před 3 měsíci +1

    What wins a war is not the size of an army, it's the best technology, training and tactics.

  • @apolakigamingandmore6376
    @apolakigamingandmore6376 Před rokem +107

    I just love how the Russians managed it on top for many years and centuries, and until China just took it all, everything, in the Fall of the USSR/Soviet Union and in the 21st Century. And how the Qing Dynasty ain't moving, and how America almost lost many men during the Vietnam War, it keeps on decreasing, and how the video Creator used historical flags, *props to you, man! Cheers and well done! Keep it up the good work!*

    • @andydufresnefromshawshank5866
      @andydufresnefromshawshank5866 Před rokem +7

      Bigger isn’t always better, Germany in both World Wars didn’t have the biggest armies but they were the strongest armies

    • @andydufresnefromshawshank5866
      @andydufresnefromshawshank5866 Před rokem +1

      @@apolakigamingandmore6376 😂 that was funny about the whole meatgrinder

    • @td9250
      @td9250 Před rokem

      @@apolakigamingandmore6376 it's the Russian gene.
      They subconsciously know they're bad for the gene pool so they have an innate need to let themselves be ground to pulver. How else would the same thing go on for centuries?

    • @alexstorm2749
      @alexstorm2749 Před rokem

      @@andydufresnefromshawshank5866 But they still lost.

    • @user-jq5iu8wi5r
      @user-jq5iu8wi5r Před rokem +3

      Распался союз и армия соответственно стала меньше, но кто сказал ,что Китай не союзник России.

  • @selvarajponnusamy9323
    @selvarajponnusamy9323 Před rokem +55

    Bharat matha ki jai💪🔥

    • @Ali-ch7tf
      @Ali-ch7tf Před 3 dny

      Remember this numbers only in peace times

  • @chrissauceda5712
    @chrissauceda5712 Před 6 měsíci +1

    What app is that?

  • @user-rl5iu3nz2n
    @user-rl5iu3nz2n Před 3 měsíci

    good works.

  • @adityaaaa586
    @adityaaaa586 Před rokem +12

    India was not in the league of top 15 until 1945 but up onto 2nd position by 2022.🔥🔥🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @mtb5778
      @mtb5778 Před 6 měsíci

      India needs a large army, it has China and Pakistan as nearby enemies.

  • @gaminglegends3056
    @gaminglegends3056 Před rokem +16

    Love to see how India came in top 10 in 1945 before freedom and the second most powerful country according to army

    • @rockwithrick007
      @rockwithrick007 Před 11 měsíci +1

      Jai Hind

    • @stoopidpaki4806
      @stoopidpaki4806 Před 9 měsíci

      So did Pakistan Army - Zindabad 🇵🇰 🇵🇰 🇵🇰 🇵🇰 🇵🇰 🇵🇰 Pk

  • @ThePolluxStra
    @ThePolluxStra Před 4 měsíci

    wait you used HOI4 music operation barbarossa?

  • @zakishere.
    @zakishere. Před 3 měsíci +1

    Bro the 1900s is crazy. 😮

  • @RicchpalsinghJat
    @RicchpalsinghJat Před 11 měsíci +60

    Wow, this video provides a fascinating historical perspective on the sizes of the world's armies over time. It's incredible to see the shifts and changes in military power throughout the years!

  • @White-su2iz
    @White-su2iz Před rokem +6

    JusT Hypothetically imagine if all of this military budget was invested in human development..

  • @Xristoforos41493
    @Xristoforos41493 Před 15 dny +2

    USA went super saiyan in WW2

  • @CeciliaManriquez-nm6bk

    Excellent

  • @mikey2time484
    @mikey2time484 Před rokem +32

    The fact thst America had those numbers during Vietnam and Vietnam wasn't even on the list speaks volumes of how that country defended itself

    • @Vsmug
      @Vsmug Před rokem +12

      America lost to rice farmers

    • @dylanmoore3201
      @dylanmoore3201 Před rokem +7

      The internet trying its best Not to misrepresent the Vietnam war be like:

    • @Vsmug
      @Vsmug Před rokem +5

      @@dylanmoore3201 America got owned

    • @MD-ex7cg
      @MD-ex7cg Před 11 měsíci

      ​@@Vsmug trust me, you would too.

    • @maximilianodelrio
      @maximilianodelrio Před 11 měsíci +4

      numbers mean nothing without context. Most of the militaty wasnt deployed in vietnam, they had troops all over the world. At its peak, there were around 500,000 americans deployed in south vietnam, with only about a fifth of that being ground troops

  • @ninatjuuhhhhh2251
    @ninatjuuhhhhh2251 Před rokem +15

    I'm inpressed that The Netherlands went in this list too!❤🇳🇱

  • @1joshjosh1
    @1joshjosh1 Před 2 měsíci

    This would be a neat graph if it was done per capita

  • @WhoDares_Wins
    @WhoDares_Wins Před 8 měsíci +7

    8:54 India 🇮🇳📈📈📈📈📈

  • @susfringgaming4018
    @susfringgaming4018 Před rokem +132

    Australia became one of most militarized countries in the world during WW2. It's estimated that 1 in 7 people were in the armed forces with even more on the home front

    • @RandomStuff-he7lu
      @RandomStuff-he7lu Před rokem +16

      As a percentage of population Australia put the most people into uniform of all the Western Allies.

    • @user-qw7rm5ox3f
      @user-qw7rm5ox3f Před rokem +16

      В СССР только в армии служил каждый пятый (18% от всего населения страны), а в тылу, на благо военной машины работали так или иначе все (включая детей и стариков)

    • @lia4667
      @lia4667 Před rokem +1

      @@user-qw7rm5ox3fAa i remember, USSR lost over 20m in that war. Can i ask which republic suffer the most cassuallities

    • @krassendimitrov9747
      @krassendimitrov9747 Před rokem +11

      1 in 4 Bulgarians in ww1 were soldiers. Try to beat that :D.

    • @lia4667
      @lia4667 Před rokem +4

      @@krassendimitrov9747ww2 Switzerland :)

  • @The_Almighty.
    @The_Almighty. Před rokem +5

    That's got to be the largest recruitment for all nations in the early 1900s

  • @mohakmilindsingh999
    @mohakmilindsingh999 Před 4 měsíci +4

    *🕉️ 🚩 🇮🇳 INDIA 🇮🇳 🚩 🕉️*

  • @AsifRoxittude
    @AsifRoxittude Před měsícem +2

    Based on the data India is 2nd but still imports arms from US, Russia & France

  • @supthee1725
    @supthee1725 Před rokem +4

    I love that South Sudan popped up at the end for a second and just flied away and left.

  • @DaanBruins
    @DaanBruins Před rokem +5

    It's really cool when everything suddenly blows up in 1914.