If anyone's wondering why they put a dancing woman at the end instead of a man, i THINK they're doing a similar substitution trick as in the "Thanks, Smokey" video, although in this case the goal is essentially to make straight men feel uncomfortable by forming an arousal association where normally there would not be one. If they just put an eroticised dancing man at the end, straight men would probably not feel anything or even feel repulsion and just look away. But here they are forced to feel drawn to or even aroused by the image, while at the same time they are being fed an obviously homoerotic and nationalistic message. Also, I just found out that the source of the lyrics is apparently a Masonic apprentice song lol.
If anyone's wondering why they put a dancing woman at the end instead of a man, i THINK they're doing a similar substitution trick as in the "Thanks, Smokey" video, although in this case the goal is essentially to make straight men feel uncomfortable by forming an arousal association where normally there would not be one. If they just put an eroticised dancing man at the end, straight men would probably not feel anything or even feel repulsion and just look away. But here they are forced to feel drawn to or even aroused by the image, while at the same time they are being fed an obviously homoerotic and nationalistic message. Also, I just found out that the source of the lyrics is apparently a Masonic apprentice song lol.