Wladimir Klitschko Vs Samuel Peter - Highlights (Exciting BACK & FORTH)
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 06. 2021
- #boxing #slugfest #samuelpeter #wladimirklitschko #klitschkovspeter #thenigeriannightmare #dr.steelhammer #legends Why not try watch some boxing highlights here mate ??
A highlight fight between the durable Nigerian Samuel Peter and the Hard Hitting Wladimir Klitschko. - Sport
Aku banggga dgn kau alip pin sikit
Dah pin
@@crazykocounters4741 mntp siak wkwkwk
iooi
Gile ah lep
@@Kim-ry3kn ko komen kat video lain ah. Nanti aku pin
The Grabbing is legendary.
@Google Wack He likes to be that fatherly figure.
@@nelsonkaiulo402 hahahahaha 😆
Hopkins & Floyd did it plenty as well
@@underwriter100 Hopkins was far smarter about it. He always held in a way that made it look like his opponent was initiating while he could throw with the opposite hand. This is literally straight hugging
That left hook kept not only us on our toes throughout. Game changer or goodnight Vienna, you never could tell.
All things considered, great bout. Shame someone had to lose.
0:59 Look at Klitschko's guard when the exchange begins. He saw that left hook coming from miles away. Beautiful defense. Anticipated it almost two full seconds before it got launched.
He didn't see it coming it was just defense discipline
@@glorialuna3633 No he definitely saw it coming, because he only put the guard up when Peter's left leg dragged behind, meaning he could put some pop in the left hand.
@@TheStraightestWhitest I saw a lot of holding not defense
😊
it’s just normal defense routine “hands up at all times”
We were all proud in Nigeria when Peter won one of the heavyweight belts. He had size and formidable power and a good chin.
However, he lacked a lacked movement, was limited technically and had a low fight IQ. He also lacked heart in certain moments and could be easily frustrated. He always ate too many shots cos he couldnt move and then he would swing wildly in frustration and sometimes it actually worked.
A decent fighter.
Almost the same problem now with AJ. He needs to learn how not to get hit and stop being too static like Standard Bank.
@@abrahamigunma I agree. Joshua needs to work on his movement and he recognized that against Ruiz in the 2nd fight. AJ is smarter than Peter and has a better grasp of boxing fundamentals. He too must improve his ring generalship and not only depend on power.
@@abrahamigunma like standard bank. ROFTL
Bro, I almost fell down laughing.
@@Johnballz83 same to Wilder.. his offense is fine but diffence is a problem.
@@jameswesonga5704 Wilder's offense isn't fine. Now that Fury has shown how to beat him with pressure, he will struggle. He has a weak left hook and doesn't know how to throw combinations without stopping over and dropping his hands.
Proud of Samuel Peters
White boy won wow
The name should be Vladimir 'Clinchko' after this performance
Les juges et l'arbitre auraient dû déclarer que Samuel Peter est le vainqueur du match
Samuels defence was poor otherwise he'd have lasted as a champ longer.
Cara... que luta foi essa?! O Peter precisava ter uma defesa um pouco melhor... sei lá. Os jabs do Vitali estavam entrando firmes nele. Não sei como suportou tanto... boa luta!!!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Man Samuel Peters hit like a Mack truck... Wow
I was more impressed by how he TOOK hits.
It looked like in instances where Peter forced his way inside, he was able to get the better of Klitschko. But it seemed like Peter preferred to mostly maintain a sparring distance. That did not work well with someone with so much greater range and a powerful straight punch that Peter mostly took without even attempting to duck. Good fight
this is was an incredible fight whit alot of action
Legends them both.🙌
SAMUEL PETER THE GREAT BOXEUR 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻🥇
This my first time watching the bouts. Peter didn't lost shamefully as some said but fought gallantly. He never gave up in spite of his opponent continuous long hand punching
Clearly won.
Dude... the press was crazy biased in the reporting. I too just watched this and realized Peters gave a great performance. If he had a better coach and used an all attck strategy, klitchko would have been clearly knocked out
It was reported as if he outboxed Peter.
So you're just gonna ignore his countless rabbit punches?
@@High5ve He didn't, if you watch the full fight you'll see Wladimir hit a lot more punches even if he didn't knock him down.
Peter was swinging wildly while KLITCHKO was teeing off on his head with vicious shots in a 1-2
Peter dropped Klitchko 3 times
peter is a strong man with a strong hand, but sadly, boxing is a sport of hitting and not getting hit, if he was able to move his head better, and kept up the pace of his attacks, he would be too formidable. but he believed he could take shots, and yes he can. but that made him lose almost every round, fighters like Sam dont last, they win through KO most times, but when they lose , it wont be because they cant fight, it would be because they lack adequate defence and heart.
That black fighter he's really strong but he's not smart fighter at all that's why he loses that fight
He won his young brother and the older one won him this was 2006
I couldn't agree with you more. They call boxing the sweet science for a reason. If Samuel could have dodged the jab at least he probably would have won this fight. Sure he can take a punch. But it's not a matter of how tough you are. It's a matter of how smart you are.
You can't question his heart though
hitting not getting hit,that is not true,all boxers get hit,floyd after fights had injuries likewise sweet pee,its called reducing the hitting
I never heard of Peter before this but would like to see more of him. Ferocious!
Peter Samuel was a good fighter, a bit as Bermane Stiverne (same age, similar style, huge talent, they sparred with each other), but both were too lazy fighters therefore they were just for short on the top.
I made a highlight reel of that guy. Feel free to watch it on my channel. If you wanna know some interesting facts about him, journeymen Marion Wilson who fought the likes of Shannon Briggs, Tyrrell Biggs, Ray Mercer, etc and was never knocked out in a fight said that Peter hit him the hardest. James Toney said Samuel peter is the hardest hitting heavyweight he has ever fought.
Vlad earned his money that night though. Tough fight for both
That’s how all heavyweights fight.
No they don’t - the hell they do , fool ! 🙄
Yeah? Let's see a welterweight get in there with a heavyweight - then tell me who's better!
@@MarkAB2210 Didn't see that in Uysk v AJ last night.
Whatever the result old Samuel was hard as nails,shit he still standing after getting hit like that,reminds me of Bert cooper.
That Samuel Peter was as strong as a Bull.
I would have liked him in a virtual match vs Rocky Marciano. What a fight that would be.
Bull vs Bull, locking horns.
Him against tyson would be interesting
Appreciate your content bro keep it up 🙌🙌
One of those straight rights would send any normal guy tho the hospital
1:34 he eats them for breakfast
?
@@crazykocounters4741 s5
@@georgedong7204 9
Scared of getting hit...
Peters knocked him down 4 times
And lost....boxing sucks
@@rafaelt.8650 boxing is more than two meatheads beating each other up, some people don't seem to understand that.
He did not. It is not a slob fight.
Peter won that fight
but only won 2 rounds of 12
If Peter was technical, nobody would've stood up to him.
@Google Wack you took this way too seriously, just saying he would've done better or became a renowned champion 🏆! We all know that nobody is unbeatable, there's always someone out there at some point.
@Google Wack I bet he takes it on all fours tho
Except James Toney Who beat him easily
@@nba23ross Not the 2nd time, he didn't. He barely won a round.
Exactly. He was iron Mike without the technical side
Shit nobody ever calls Wladimir a hugger and runner lol
Sam Peter is a big strong guy he can sure take a punch
What a chin Samuel Peter!!!
Fun Fact: Wladimir Klitschko said that Samuel Peter had the best chin out of every fighter he has ever fought. The strongest punch that Wlad threw was a left hook that wobbled peter but not enough to drop him. He also said that left hook was so hard that he broke his fist.
@@crazykocounters4741 I know that, he said it in "Best i faced". Also I think that Ross Purrity shows an undeliverable chin agaist Wladimir : he took more punches than Peter, more straight right but he won in 11 round.
@@crazykocounters4741 Wladimir was a better fighter so far with the myth Stewart!!!
@@Shovelhook I don't think so, he was very green when he fought ross purity, samuel peter fought a better more experience than the wlad the purity fought. Peter took better & harder shots compared to what purity took. third, look at their reaction, purity was consitently staggered by Wlad's punches while peter barely showed a reaction. Like seriously, look back at Wlad vs Purity and Wlad vs Peter 1. I can asure you that Peter took better shots and the way he handled it was WAY better than Purity did. Wlad's form on his fight with purity was SOOO terrible compared to the Wlad that peter is fighting
@@crazykocounters4741 without a doubt Wladimir was a lot of better fight here than he faced Purrity but Ross took huge shots and he came back, however Peter had a better chin.
Damn Samuel Peter is durable. How can Vladimir win after 3 knockdowns? The referees must be sleeping.
Wlad won more rounds... simple as that. Wlad even landed twice more punches than Peter... 204 to 100. It's sad people like you only pay attention to knockdowns instead of looking at the whole match picture. All judges scored it 114-111... meaning Wlad about 8-9 rounds compared to only 3-4 for Peter.
I haven’t seen the whole fight so I can’t say specifically for this fight, but you can definitely win a fight mathematically even if you get knocked down 3 times.
Let’s say a fighter wins 8 rounds but is knocked down 3 times by another fighter. Let’s say the other fighter wins 4 rounds, 3 in which they got a knockdown. They would still lose because the score would be 113-112
omg peter won only those rounds in which he knocked klitschko down
He got dominated the whole fight and only landet some lucky shots and pressured him after. Wladimir was the way better boxer, Samuel was tough as nails.
Funny how everyone in this commentsection says Peter won, just because of this highlight reel haha
I've been wondering too, withholding all Klitschko's good jab, Peter didn't go down, despite the punishment if these jabs he was able to knockdown Klitschko not once but thrice and someone called this luck, please explain...cause I'm lost here...in today's era if you scored even a knockdown against your opponent you'll most definitely win
I don't understand how Klitschko won this match,if Peter scored 3 knock-downs
You echoed my mind
To the judge it was by points
At least one was a slip...
1 10-7 rd and 1 10-8 rd.
The rest of the fight, Peters got out punched every round.
If the knockdowns happened in 3 different rds., then the best case you could make is for a draw.
Because there are 10 other rounds to score.
Vlad a underrated boxer
Regardless if you went into this fight mortal enemies. To see that another man took your best punches, will make you respect them at the end
Ooj
.m1ml.p90poyi.mellim lillo olp em
q
Nmll
I1mkkkki
A trainer once told me that if your opponent keeps clinching you after each time he lands a shot, just retaliate by hitting him below the belt. Yes a point or two will be deducted from you but he'll eventually get the message.
Holding is no foul but EXCESSIVE holding is.
Was that trainers name Andrew Golata? Dumbest thing I’ve ever read, intentional low blows have no place in boxing.
@@crazykocounters4741which is klitschkos game
My first time watching this fight, trust me Peter didn't loss this fight as I was told...as a matter of fact, Peter deserved a win in this fight
He lost unfortunately, see the end.
peter lost that fight. he won only those rounds in which he knocked klitschko down
Well he had a chance to settle the score in the rematch and we know what happened there
I wonder if it's the same fight I watched. Go watch the full fight. Peter took a whole lot of punches! He had no defence. He was just trying to land a big right hand to end it all but that didn't happen. He lost even though his foul punches wre recorded.
He got dominated the whole fight and only landet some lucky shots and pressured him after. Wladimir was the way better boxer, Samuel was tough as nails.
Funny how everyone in this commentsection says Peter won just because of this highlight reel haha.
Did you guys ever watch the whole fight he landed twice as much shots as Samuel landed.
Cea mai mare mizerie!
Honestly If Samuel Peter wouldve kept fighting he wouldve got one of those belts
He did
He won 1 of the belts (wbc) i think because he was a real talent.
He however did not have the discipline 4 longetivity & more achievements.
We his country men hear of him drinking, eating a lot & generally messing around when he wins a bout.
No self control per say.
Talent is definitely not enough.
Vitali battered him when he came out of retirement
@@stephenwylie1041 true but Vitali is Better than Wladimir.
@@lancehood7916 Vitali was tougher and is one of my favourites but wlad was a great heavyweight he was very mobile and could whack with both fists that straight right and left hook were deadly.Oh and wlad did knock Peter out in the rematch
The toughness of Samuel Peter reminds me of the toughness previously shown by one of the commentators, George Foreman.
Look at Ike ibeabuchi and Samuel Peter both have good chins and power, both form the same country and ethnic groups that are related to each other, coincidence I think not. they kind of fight the same.
@@JJ-pn5ut ibeabuchi is more skilled, way faster and hit harder imo
@@e.hdavid1902 yea but there enthic groups are related that was my points so it’s not surprising they have similar characteristics
No, he's much more like Frazier. Just not as good.
1:36-1:42 the way Samuel endured those right hands is incredible
When you cut a 36 Mins Fight to 5 mins highligh - And still 50% of the montage consits Klitschko holding and pushing 🤷♂️
Yup... smh
Pretty much sums up his career.
@@rubenaerts7284 yes
BOTH Klits jab, grab hold HOLD
ZZZZZZ😴😴
Yeah, not everyone can stop punches by their head all night long like muahamad ali used to. Man has to use what he has. Unlike Ali in his late 40's, Klicko can be understood when he speaks. He did something right.
Vladimir won over a worthy opponent in Peters. Good fight.
Wladimir had the best 1 2 in boxing history.
Which fight were the judges watching?
How did Peter lose this fight after inflicting multiple knock-downs on Wladimir?
I am asking myself the same question.
@@mapatomothapo5891 money talks
Lol, Peter is too rugged
Le nigerian manque de technique el vladimir triche avec ses multiples accolades!
So far he wasn't k.o, points wins every match
Vladimir used his reach well enough. Those jabs did it for him.
And is holding also legal??
Throw one jab and you hug peter for long continue like that till you win. That is the attributes of a coward. Brave men and real fighter like peter come out to fight through out the 12 rounds they are not interested in hugging you, they are hungry to knock you out.
@Obi Sanchez.
Think before you write. Man fights with what he has. Vladimir had a terrible chin, he knew it. So he fought his way which made him second longest reigning champion. Hed he used your advice, he would have been on the floor all the time. If you want to watch brave (but stupid) fighters go to street. This is SPORT. Hit and avoid getting hit. That is boxing. Vladimir was not for average pub guys who after their fifteenth beer wanted to see savage fights, but for those wjo understand the sport. You don't seem to be amongst them.
@@camberlubos3995 That's exactly why Floyd Mayweather is still undefeated, he hits and avoids getting hit by all means even if he has to park the bus lol.
@@camberlubos3995 Shut up!
how on earth did samuel peter lose this fight
mehn dis was daylight robbery
Iron jaw vs glass jaw
Really Peter like Brave attack' very interesting
Qqqq
Peter's chin was MAD
How many times Vladimir pick himself off the floor?
3 to peters none. And Klitschko “ won” 🙄
He was thrown down and not knocked down
@@abrahamigunma thrown down after getting hit on the head really hard. 3 times, that's all.
peter won only those rounds in which he knocked klitschko down
Good performance by Valadimir- he beaten hell out of this Nigerian and broken the long standing myth of black power in Boxing. Bravo !
He still punches really hard. It just shows Peter is limited and one dimensional. Overall he displayed power and a rock solid chin.
@@crazykocounters4741 What tyson fury is doing with black boxers is remarkable and enough to prove that myth of black power is absolutely fake.
@@sajjadchannar4839 lol no one is talking about blk power but you, seems like it’s gotten stuck into your head. I’m happy we live rent free in you head loll. Plus he didn’t beat the hell out of him. He got knocked down three time buddy. The only way he lost was because he came out of retirement if he didn’t he have been spotless. Oh and don’t forget that Wladimir Klitschko has gotten knocked out my AJ and it’s only a matter of time before someone blk comes and does the same with Tyson fury
@@sajjadchannar4839 we black have won more heavyweight title more than white people. Best boxer in history are all black like Muhammad Ali, Joe Louis, mike tyson, Hindu man don't have no boxer sucka.
George made a good statement , Klitschko is holding to much.why isn't the referee saying this , if you seen peters vs toney fight ,peters is relentless. This was close but peters is on , Klitschko was a serial holder and w nt down to the floor , bad judgement on this night.
Vladimir is good at holding.
Yes!
It's your opinions
@@arafatsaid962 ,
He must be must more than one.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Super og'ir vazn bo'yicha jahon chempioni
You can thank Emanuel Steward for saving Wlad's career. He took an easily gassed fighter with a glass jaw and showed him how to jab and hold. Wlad was bigger and taller than nearly everyone and his reach and new Steward strategy made him very difficult to beat in a era with little competition. I remember Emanuel saying that "Wlad will not throw one right hand for the first five rounds". If the Refs had not been so lenient with Wlad and his holding, there might have been some more upsets.
Steward also said that Tyson Fury was the future of HW boxing, and that it was now entering the realm of "super HW's". One other thing- watch a highlight reel of Wlad's KO's- and you will see that he pushed nearly all of his knockdowns in the chest with both hands. Very interesting-
Saving his career is a stretch. Who in the 2000's beats young Wladimir without it being a Corrie Sanders situation? David Hayne is pretty much the only guy I can think of besides his brother. Wladimir did tons of jabbing and holding, before Steward. Steward's big ticket was teaching Wladimir how to hide his jaw better and work on his timing. Also, it sounds like you're trying to downplay Wladimir. You can pretty much thank every fighter's trainer beyond the year 1920 for their success. What would Ali, Bowe, Patterson, Fury, and Tyson have been without great trainers? Gatekeepers, at best. Very, very few fighters can be a one man band a succeed without the help of a great team, which is why a lot of modern mma and boxing fighters thank their team after fights these days. The trainer might show them how to do certain things, but the fighter is still the one who has to get in there and do it.
@@williamsmith1803 So Ali, Tyson, and Fury would be "gatekeepers at best?" Sorry pal, that little gem disqualifies you from any discussion about Boxing. David Haye and Corrie? Please. Wlad and the poor competition set HW Boxing back a decade.
@@dunningkruger3774 Without their trainers, you don't have the slightest idea of how they would've ended up, clown. Tyson was just some street bum, until Cus turned him into a killing machine and even then he immediately began to rapidly descend into mediocrity once Cus passed. Tyson Fury was just a big lurch who had no power and couldn't stay in shape, until Kronk turned him around. Do you think John Fury and Hughie were going to bring him close to the level he's at now? Muhammad Ali with a different style than the unique one he used would've gotten him murdered. Imagine Ali trying to sit down on his jab and plant his feet to back up Liston like a traditional boxer... he would've had developed the shakes from that one fight alone. Without the right team, fighters who have the potential to dominate the sport won't do shit.
Agree I don’t like Clinch-ko’s style.
@@kineahora8736 Perfect description of Low-Power Ali - CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH JAB JAB JAB JAB CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH CLINCH
Nothing unanimous about that fight. Peter had Vladimir down 3 times. If Peter had scored a KO, he would have had the fight. One of Vladimir's toughest fights.
@Ronny Blogs I had no issues with Vladimir winning. If he had done enough, why not. And if Peter did anything illegal, am sure the ref was there to sort it out either by warning or points deductions. However, that was never a (unanimous decision) win.
3:15 This is legit a cozy hug.
Achei que houve uns nockdowns a favor do Samuel Peter mas o Juiz fez vista grossa
Man, there's a lot of people that don't understand boxing scoring here. Generally it works like this, simplified: you win a round, it's 10-9. You win a round and get a knockdown, it's 10-8. Win a round and get two knockdowns and it's 10-7, and so on.
Peter got a 10-8 round (one knockdown), a 10-7 round (two knockdowns), and a 10-9 round. Klitschko won the other nine rounds 10-9... which is why all three judges scored it the same, 114-111. You might not agree with the system, but that's how it works.
There should be a cumulative knockdown score rule.
First knockdown is 10-8 then 10-7 and then 10-6.
You are basically unable to protect yourself due to a direct action of your opponent.
Samuel Petar 🎉
Peter didn't lose in my opinion. Klitschko didn't win but was given to him. May be Peter committed so many fouls and got his points deducted. He showed dogged determination. I couldn't watch the match then and this is my first time. I have a firm belief that Peter didn't loss badly
Try and watch the full fight, fam.
You can't get the full picture from highlights.
Peter gassed out.
Peter won this fight to me, how can you have 3 knock downs and not win?
@@jaydeeentertainments2985 Lmao.
@@jaydeeentertainments2985 I agree. To me, knockdowns should have a greater effect on the score.
@@zilhad3584 wrong
Vladimir sure earned his cheque that night.!
Сильный бой зрелищный Сэмуэль хорошо в размен идёт прессингует
Klisko andlannn wonderful
Это надо нарисовать так победу.
Peters blocks punches with his face to keep his hands free.. good strategy
😱 WOW
Still wondering who Vladimir won this fight
It's crazy when you think about it, Wilder dropped Fury twice and got a draw, Peter dropped klitscko 4 times and Klitscko won UD.
@@joejoyce9979 it's crazy the fact of delusional wilder's fangirl still exist
@@joejoyce9979 u cant even count go to school lol
Boxing corruption
omg peter won only those rounds in which he knocked klitschko down!
I was lied to about this fight, i was made to believe Samuel Peter was beaten blue black.
Me too.. I never watched it..and I am surprised as to how Peter somewhat dominated
Watch the rematch, he was beaten blue black red🤣
No b only you
It must have been the rematch and not this
Samuel Peter, quiet a revelation.
The Judges should be fired.....
Peter brings the fight 👊🤜🤛👊
I don’t know how you win a fight after being down three times.
Because you won the other ten rounds clearly.
@@conanthecribber You obviously didn’t see the fight
@@melanatedone4894 With that username you totally wouldn't be the type to watch biased highlights and assume that three knockdowns across two rounds wins you a fight of 12 rounds, right?
There was no dispute about the result of this fight. Samuel Peter accepted the result because Klitschko outlanded him 2 to 1.
Peter knocked the clincher down three times.
I remember this robery
I get the math but it didn't have the feel of a win for Klitschko.
I see no robbery in this fight
Rubbish commetary, but thanks for the highlight footage.
No problem
They don't call him Nigerian Nightmare for nothing
Peter's problems was actually a lack of plan B.He believe so much in his power but often has no answer if his plan doesn't work out eventually.
How on Earth did Vladimir won this fight?
How? Boxing smarts and Technique
Seriously.
@@lenurban his most serious fight is the fight as Mayor of Kyiv against Russian aggression
@@ansc6472 Mayor of Kyiv is his brother Vitaly)
The definition of “holding” in the ABA rules is exactly what Vlad does... it’s the deliberate act of holding or maintaining a clinch with no effort to punch. Clinching while working is not “holding” but what he does is attempt to wrap up using both his arms and no attempt at all to punch is going on.
Which is why he's a boring fighter to watch 👏
@@Ze_Moose yep, the jab and grab style is horrendous to watch
@@mcprotein tru
Вот у него держак, такие плюхи выдерживать!
Its left right hold on repeat
Sam has that fire hydrant neck...he can take a monster punch
The great.
This was a robbery !
robbed in usa? stfu
@@game_channel1998 You must be from another country outside the US? 😂
@@LurnWelli j
'BIG PETER BY KLITSCHKO!" -Lampley
I watched the whole video and wanted Vladamir to win but before declaring the winner, I thought Peter has won the matches, but Vladamir was declared winner and I thought it unfair and it surprised me.....as i read the comment section, Peter might has lost because he made a lot of fouls...
Truth, he did not win
The idea is who scores more punches to the head....this is what the judges ought to count, and Peters took too many coming forward....he lost dismally. He hit home harder, but a lot less number of times...
@@wekpomsbenin6830 ok..i understand ...thanks for educating me..
Im Nigerian but i think Vlad won clearly. Yes he got knocked down a number of times but for most of the fight he was scoring at will. Peter had absolutely no defence.
@@Johnballz83 You think if the roles were reversed, and Vladmir knocked down peter 4 times, with peter hitting Vlad with straight punches, they will declare peter the winner?
Peter needed better Defense and Combination Punching!😠
Very filthy decision, thus game r also polluted
George fights walking ahead in a straight line he pushes his classic way to get space
He pivots his opponents for space
He throws wide uppercuts and hooks he repeats the same push patterns and pivots this is his style as im watching
Its very basic really basic this is his style he is very slow on top of being sloopy and easy to read cause his pattern as
George relentless pressure is what allowed him to land shots but those wide shots had to be repeated cause he was so easy to read and slow
Peter is way more advanced ver of foreman minus not wasting as many shots/not as basic/not as sloppy
Уважуха Афроамериканцу+++)))
Great holding by Klitschko again..Ref should penalise Klitschko early for holding 1 pt to discourage it, and penalise again as he does it, then it would be a fair fight.
In my opinion, Klitschko is not as great a boxer as many would think, he does way too much holding, hugging, grasping around the head and running away from the fight even though most of his opponents are shorter than he is. That's not real fighting.
ALI did same with Fraizer 1
Samuel was simply the Mike Tyson of right hooks but lacked the technicality and discipline to last longer. He also fought with too much emotion, easier to get into his head
And people say James Toney is a bum🤦🏾♂️
When I’m at the club 😂😂 5:34
Samuel is the best .
El afrodescendiente es un rival muy muy fuerte,
SteelHammer ? More on Pushing wew