Next Generation Bradley IFV Infantry Fighting Vehicle tracked armoured BAE Systems US army
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 12. 2016
- At AUSA 2016, the Association of the United States Annual Meeting & Exposition, BAE Systems has launched demonstrator of Next Generation Bradley Fighting Vehicle The concept vehicle features an upgraded chassis that allows for significantly increased underbelly protection, improved force protection for mounted troops, compartmentation of fuel and ordnance, and more space and electrical power for future technology growth
Read full article at this link www.armyrecognition.com/index....
Army Recognition Group
Global Defence & Security News
Defense & Security News Web TV
Online magazine for defence and security industry
Worldwide Defense & Security News
Marketing and advertising for Defense & Security Industry and Exhibition
Land Forces equipment, weapons and vehicles
www.armyrecognition.com
Contact mail: marketing@armyrecognition.com - Věda a technologie
I watched *one* clip of Pentagon Wars and then I get recommended ten of these
Same
Your profile pic reminds me of a Churchill gentleman.
Same but it didn’t start until I watched the whole movie on YT
Same here lol
Definitely
Now it just needs a sign on it that says, "Don't shoot me, I'm not a tank!"
"We know it's not a tank - but will the enemy?"
In 50 Languages, Ne Pucaj, ja nisam Tenk. That's in Serbian.
ฉันไม่ใช่รถถัง อย่ายิงฉัน Thai Languages
לא לירות בי, אני לא טנק. in hebrew
In greek
Μην μου ρίχνεται.
Είμαι τεθωρακισμένω.
Δεν είμαι άρμα μάχης.
Dont shoot at me.
I am a troop carrier
I am not a battle tank
Whenever I watch something about Bradley - I see "Pentagon Wars".
Haha me too
say what you like about it but one of the generals in the pentagon war was right during the gulf war more t72 was taken out by Bradley then the m1 abrams sure 3 of them were kill by the t72 but they were caught with pants down due to combat maneuver era by getting to close then intended so that more human era since no ifv at the time or even now can take a hit from mbt and survive in most situation the iraqi tank never had a chance the Bradley with its atgm and advance optics kill any t72 that came in to range before the t72 had any chance to shoot back. Like it or not all the hate we gave the Bradley for having reconnaissance capability and the punch to take out half of dc is what made the Bradley so successful in war it was in in fact Bradley that gave commander such a flexible platform to work with its the first apc that can actually defend itself against an enemy mbt since it can see the enemy before they see him and have enough punch to take them out and honestly if you wanted a simple apc that has good Armour protection from small arms fire the us military still have 5000 m113 and more then 8000 in storage there really no point in making apc with better protection then the m113 since modern tandem charge hand held anti tank solution require top end mbt level of protection and that just unrealistic level of protection that you can demand from apc/ifv the best you can do is have all round small arms/auto cannon fire protection and hard kill system like trophy in combat vehicle like this
A troop transport that can't carry troops, a reconnaissance vehicle that's too conspicuous to do reconnaissance and a quasi-tank that has less armor than a snow-blower, but carries enough ammo to take out half of D.C. mark 2
Bin thher done that! Ya use wat ya got! Bitchin dont do dic? ACAVS 19DELTA🐴🔩🔧🔨🎆🎇🔫
Pentagon wars lol
This is redundant! If you look at other IFV like the BMP 3, Lynx, Puma and Ajax from other countries, they have completely immulated what has the Bradley had already done. The Bradley the a pioneer of modern IFV!
Expect that the BMP 3 was based on the Obyekt 685 light tank prototype with a 100mm gun 2A48-1 from 1975. This vehicle did not enter series production, but the chassis, with a new engine, was used for the next-generation infantry combat vehicle Obyekt 688[6] from A. Blagonravov's design bureau. The Ob. 688 weapons configuration-an externally mounted 30 mm gun and twin Konkurs ATGM launcher-was rejected; instead the new 2K23 armament system was selected. The resulting BMP-3 was developed in the early 1980s and entered service with the Soviet Army officially in 1987. Please end this bullshit about how ever country has been copying American equipment. The Soviets were the first in the regards to making and deploying IFVs with the BMP-1. They have their own philosophy when it comes to IFV's, mainly to cause as much destruction as possible while delivering troops. The Puma is far better then the Bradley will ever be, that is a fact. The Bradley is starting to slowly become inferior due to other nations developing better IFV's, like Russias Kurganets-25. The BMP-3 is better armed than the Bradley. It carries a 100mm cannon and a 30mm autocannons in it's turret. The 100mm gun fires a very effective HE she'll as well as very effective gun launched ATGMS. The Bradley just has a 25mm autocannon and a dual TOW launcher. The BMP is faster than the Bradley by a margin of around 20 kph. It is much lighter at around 18 tons compared to the 27 tons of the Bradley. So tell me how the Russians looked at the Bradley and decided to put a 100mm cannon on it?
Bradley was researched in the 60s and entered service in the year 1980. BMP 3 was made in responce to the armament that the Bradley carried, it was not the first but why is it that every country after the Bradley was intered service, they suddenly want to match or even exceed the Bradley's firepower With their own IFV?
This configuration was pioneered by the Bradley even if you like it or not.
The Bradley is a good vehicle. It saved lives during Iraq. I was a Bradley mechanic for 15 yrs and did 3 tours to Iraq. I personally recovered destroyed and damaged Bradley's back then. The insurgents got REALLY good at hitting the Bradley's soft spot back then. Which was the fuel cell under the turret with IED's. It got so back that we lost 2 Brads on the same day doing the same mission. With both of them taking IED hits under the turrets. The fuel cell under the turret was a big issue because the hull would collapse up into the fuel cell and cause it to burst sending fuel into the crew area and turret. If it ignited and this did happen at times. Then you had a huge problem. That was the Bradleys biggest problem. If you watch the movie the Pentagon Wars. They even state that the Israelis wouldn't buy the Bradley until the fuel was moved to outside the vehicle for the crews safety. Iraq became the place that made this issue much more obvious. I want to say I am happy this problem might get fixed if they go ahead with the changes listed here with external fuel and ammo storage. But honestly its too little too late for the guys who died because of this crap. I will always be proud of being a Bradley mechanic and being of service to my crews. They were all incredible soldiers who put their lives on the line daily. But as a recovery operator I also know the things I saw during Iraq that will never go away.
Thankyou for your service!
Respect.🇺🇸🦅
Eles eram insurgents no seu próprio país, estavam a defendê-lo.
Vocês eram os invasores que invadiram um país mentindo dizendo que o Iraque tinha armas de destruição em massa.
Não tinha, se as tivessem vocês nunca o teriam invadido.
Outros países as têm realmente, e nem por isso vocês os invadiram.
Pussys.
That’s cool and all but America is the evil country going around the world toppling regimes and pressuring foreign people. Blowing up bridges and pipelines and everything else. Pushing for war everywhere. Are you blind man you’re the bad guy.
And we added a 5 million on the price... that's the part they always forget to say.
Billion. With a B.
What are the Sheep Specs?
"A troop transport that can't carry troops, a reconnaissance vehicle that's too conspicuous to do reconnaissance --"
"And a quasi-tank that has less armor than a snow-blower, but carries enough ammo to take out half of D.C. - Pentagon Wars
Bradley crew dismount of 8 years here. now that i left the military i miss the bradley. as soon as the back hatch closes and we take off the noise would put me right to sleep. good ole days
what the hell. Riding in the back makes my ass vibrate to hell. literally makes every bone in my body vibrate XD. the sound is absolutely piercing too. cant sleep for shit. Lol. i could sleep in a tank any day cause of the whining of the engine but bradley, no sir ree.
hyunki0510 that's how much time i spent in one during deployment to iraq
Crunchy.
@@hyunki0510 Oh if you're talking about that vibration that goes from the bottom of your spine up that's one of the worst things there is to endure!
Did you ever have to have someone running alongside the thing with extra ammo?
If you have to design us a hat to hold goddamn missiles then do it. xD
Still a very tall Recon platform
Was a BFV Gunner and BC for many years. Best times in the Army. The sound of the 25mm sending rounds downrange was the best. That thump-thump-thump is something I'll never forget.
A little further back I rode in 113 tack vehicle. Aluminum I believe. I was a fire support team leader. My vehicle was only one with 4 huge antennas. And it was slow could not keep up with armor. The Bradley was a welcome replacement.
Paul Br lol they still use 113s
@@sriracha3049 Not for infantry.
Did you get to test it with sheep inside??
WERE ARE THE SHEEP???
Did you get the specs for sheeps?
They put those sheeps on the incinerator again >:-(
You are the sheep, lol
@@wino0000006
Does it come in a submarine with sheeps inside?
This is like an armoured lighthouse on tracks.. I'm sure you will have an exellent view of all the incomming fire!
did he call us fat 0:44
I was wondering that too? Or maybe he thinks you're taller?
We carry a lot more gear now, front and back armor plates on every infantryman, more ammo, water and etc.
Yes and I'm sure the extra space he referenced is like 2" at the most
Oh Yea! Like the personal computer that was designed for every infantryman plus spare batteries that would add another 6 pounds to his carry weight. Millions were spent researching this stupid idea.
Oh Yea! Like the personal computer that was designed for every infantryman plus spare batteries that would add another 6 pounds to his carry weight. Millions were spent researching this stupid idea.
Well if the ammo storage comparments are no longer accessible from i side the vehicle, then where are they? If placed outside of the vehicle as suggested in the video, then the crew must actually dismount during an engagement to access their own ammo. This sounds like a problem.
The Army needs to work with the Germans on a new IFV; The Bradley is too old, the Puma sets the standard in my opinion.
@@doorguner01 "we". Like when sportsfans say we won. Stahp.
Lynx is in the OMFV competition and frankly Puma is loaded with issues regarding troops
Pentagon wars 2
"Hey isn't the Bradley prwtty boxy guys?"
*Yup*
"LETS MAKE IT BOXIER!"
good to see Mitsubishi HI involvement in this project.
can wait for pentagon wars 2
Pentagon wars 2 F35 edition
Increased space for larger soldiers, as a big guy who been in these-about damn time
It's huge!!
every time I see a Bradley I can't stop thinking of the time I saw the movie called PENTAGON WARS . very funny movie.
Jesus enough with the 25mm put at least a 30mm on the damn thing
Can't. There's some dumb requirement about minimum main weapon ammo per vehicle,and they can pack more 20mm than 30mm.
Providence The A4 is rumored to have a 30mm gun, but the turret had to be retooled because of the larger gun, ammo, and associated equipment.
***** if the south Koreans and Swedes can fit a 40mm on their IFV/AFV with a few hundred rounds of ammunition then why can't we? Armor is getting better
Providence the 40 mm gun on the system 90 vehicles has to do dual Duty he is supposed to be able to engage armored vehicles and support Infantry whereas the 25mm gun on the Bradley is to support Infantry and the tow missile launchers are there to deal with armor. it's a design Theory and it cost theory on what works best for each Nation
Providence yvotgfvifgfvififigviv bbobvhogo
Stunning armored vehicle new Bradley
❤️
Is there anywhere where we can find the sheep specs?
is it still amphibious? do you fill the fuel with water? how does it hold up against romanian rpg's?
You need a updated showing with the big cannon
The M3 Bradley is a beautiful military vehicle, I want it to remain operational for many more decades, and never need to be replaced from the useless omfv. And I want it upgraded from M3A3 to M3A4 Bradley!
I want to see the new improve Bradley a little more bigger, carries 40mm , carries 6 missiles against tanks or aircraft's, and others that's the Bradley I want to see I hope in the future they can do it Bradley became my 2nd favorite military vehicle
I was in the US Army from 1983-1986. This is was a state of the art back then. Look at what Russian has done with the BMP. It carries missiles to take out tanks or any aircraft. It still a battlefield taxi. The Pentagon hasn't keep up with the BMP
but does the crew still have to wear the TOW missiles as hats?
wow looks awersome. I would have like to be a BC on one of those
How about a 120mm smooth bore gun and when is this going to finally fly?
does it have hats for the soliders to wear the rockets
Why haven’t we put the 105mm turret from the Stryker MGS on the Brad yet ?
Today's Bradley vehicle fleet is even better.
I can't believe how tall it stands! That's a very high sliowet! What's up with the 25mm chain gun? Couldn't we filed something larger? I like the reactive armor!
Troops won't like reactive armour when it goes off near them!!!
You couldn’t add bucket seats... you know people have to actually go inside right?
" Need bigger bradley for larger soldiers "
'Murica...
When I was in Tulsa, OK working with EDS (now a part of HP), I used to have a hair cut in a barber shop owned and operated by twin brothers who both retired from the US Army with the rank of Lt. Col. I could not identify one from the other. They were both high school graduates and enlisted in the Army. Both took the COCC. When they reached mandatory retirement, both decided to train as barbers. They built a shop for themselves and one of the wives. We were discussing their lives in the Army, how they build their swimming pools and how they share cleaning the barber/hair salon.
I asked the colonel, why is there a "Bradley Fighting Vehicle" and not "Patton Fighting Vehicle", Bradley was more of an armchair general and a political expediency individual.
He replied that he had not thought of that and he himself was surprised of that small issue that I brought out.
Wow. Great story. I was hoping for something a little better after you gave me two soldiers life stories.
Can it survive a live round test?
Does it fly yet?
BRADLEY IFV WILL NEVER DIE.
It's the Nod's first light tank!
is that opened door is actually an armor? if so then you dont need an rpg to destroy this IFV you just need a 12.7 dshka and thats it shoot the front door and you get 1 bradly kill
Is it amphibious?
Too fancy
how did it do in the sheep test?
Over 30 years later they're still waiting for the sheep specs.
good modernization :)
make a fire support version with a 40mm bofors main gun and a 50cal gatling as a coax. replace troop seating with ammunition storage and you have the juice to to the job.
ravener would defeat the purpose of the vehicle
The Bradley is an ifv a infantry fighting vehicle its is ment to deploy troops in combat while keeping them safe and providing fire support
This exists and is in production now, the M3A4 Bradley fire support vehicle. The Army will be receiving these with the new Mk.44 'Bushmaster II' 30mm cannon with proximity-fuze and APFSDS rounds plus extra ammunition storage in place of passenger seating. The M3A4 is replacing and supplementing the already-in-service M3A3 Bradley fire support vehicle. The vehicle in this video is the M2A4 *IFV* model, which is supposed to carry infantry in the back and then support them by defeating enemy IFV's, light vehicles, light armor, and infantry, a task which the 25mm cannon is well-suited for.
A tank is what you would want in this case, or an armored truck.
Bradley m2 os m3?
can it swim ?
Isn't that suppose to be a troop carrier ?
ТВ сбоку входит в стандарную комплектацию или за доп. оплату?))) И где баллоны для кока-колы??
Would a "mine-blast event" be a mine-blast?
what Business is this?
0:47, yes, alotta soldiers are built bigger than before, but they're not fat like some kid playing COD. Making the Bradley safer isn't that hard to do (not that its s good it doesn't need armor but rather you could literally add cardboard and Elmer's Glue and it'd make it safer than it is).
A troop carrier that barely carries troops, a recon vehicle too big to do recon, and a tank with armor like a Cadillac.
That's one THICC gal.
Is the best
Why did they ditch the work platform? Need it for maintenance and in the event of problems to disconnect the drives for towing. It already had a false floor, it covered the 25mm ammo stored there. Want an upgrade? 30mm gun. Same size round as A10. That'll pierce that tank
Yes this will do BUT but a 35mm cannon
So, can it swim now?
Yup, straight down.
So its it an APC or is it a Tank?
Hi, It's an IFV Infantry Fighting Vehicle. Thanks to follow Army Recognition Defense and Security Web TV News channel. Alain CEO Army Recognition Group
Are these going to be sold to "El Presidente" of Chimichanga too?
No, El Presidente spends his people's money on stuff they actually need, like an IFV with a hood that's more than an inch thick.
The Bradley is Badly in need of a goodly replacement.
But can it fly? I can't see any wings...
Should buy the PUMA from Germany.
Ww1 called, they want their bolted armor back
This is what we're building!?
where'e coaxial 7,62
Second to none boi getting THICC I thought they were trying to replace Brad
1:46 is that brick module is ERA
It looks like an apartment block with an auto cannon!
This man voice have 90 years old !
The thing can swim?!
Where's the big cannon
You could see that thing 3 miles away LOL And what's the up armored weight of this rolling coffin? Trillions more to GDLS and Cadillac Gage....
Need completely new design for the Bradley.
watch "Pentagon Wars" movie
what do you think if you take them to Syria???
Next gen Bredley ey... Whats the Sheep Specs?
Waterproof deck lids
We need the CV90 mk 4
gudd
Good lord the Bradley is tall..
So, another 12 billion to develop?
LED headlights. New green paint.
Flat surfaces are not conducive to surviving a direct hit. Why no slope?
I am amazed how Indians live in the US and maintain their Indian names and culture whilst speaking in American accent - pretty much the same in the UK and Canada and yet in Australia they assume names like for instance this guy would be Dave Bajaj or Peter Singh, James Singh etc. Tells you the acceptance and tolerance levels in Australia compared to the rest of the English speaking world.
Well, we hate India tech support in the USA. Indians think they speak great English, but nobody can understand the convenience store accent.
sooo basically a bad puma?
Someone at the BAE production facility has a severe rivet fetish
Id rathe have a thousand of those small humanoid honda robots that can do acrobatics and give they ninja swords! You could power them with small plutonium power packs and detonate them at will, from some distance of course.
When a salesman tries to sell you a AFV.
The original Bradley was ok when it came out. This version is already outdated, compared with the CV 90
This started as an replacement for the M113, a 12,3 t vehicle carrying 11,
now it is 32,66 t and carries 6.
Except it has that ability to engage structures and light vehicles with it's main gun and even take out main battle tanks with it's TOW launcher, you are comparing an APC to an IFV, obviously the APC is going to carry more troops as that is it's main purpose, an IFV is also supposed to be able to provide direct fire-support and it can against all ground targets reliably.
Lets build it
THEY BUILDING IT!?
{Seal of approuval}
give it a 40 mm and 4 help fire missels
A Little late on this but the 25mm is not going to cut it. The frontal armor is a joke. They pretty much designed a big box of add-on armor.