Disappearing Arctic sea ice
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 03. 2018
- This visualization begins by showing the dynamic beauty of the Arctic sea ice as it responds to winds and ocean currents. Research into the behavior of the Arctic sea ice for the last 30 years has led to a deeper understanding of how this ice survives from year to year. In the animation that follows, age of the sea ice is visible, showing the younger ice in darker shades of blue and the oldest ice in brighter white. This visual representation of the ice age clearly shows how the quantity of older and thicker ice has changed between 1984 and 2016.
Download video: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4616
Transcript: svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000... - Věda a technologie
I'm from Alaska and back 1999-2000 in October we would have about 20 to 30 feet of snow but over the years it's been snowing less and less. And now it rains alot in October and snow comes around Middle of November and every year it changes to more rain and less snow.
For some reason I get this strange fear some thing is going to happen with this
I’m from California and the temperature used to be normal for me. I moved to Florida over 20 years ago and when I got here the climate was sweltering hot. Now the temperature in FL is normal for me. When I go back to California to visit I nearly freeze to death. Proof positive the Earth has cooled over the last 24 years. 😅
But if you think about it, the Earth is over 4.5 billion years old. It has been through asteroid impacts that wiped out dinosaurs, an ice age and more. 30 years is nothing
It has to be the electrician magnetizing the heat waves from the sun or the carbon monoxide in the atmosphere from the heat factories.
@@CoconutPete how does the fact the climate has always changed mean global warming won’t be problematic?
10 years ago in Ukraine it was snowing every new year and kids were playing on ice, which was 10-20 cm, now it is 0-3 cm and even in january it can be rain instead of snow
The same in Hungary and the temperature can be 15 Celsius even in December.
Now it’s raining bullets😂😂😂
We are headed into a season that will last about 5 years and bring lots of snow to parts of the world.. ocean currents baby!
PLEASE UPDATE !!! ...need to know 2016-2020
Don't worry, everything is fine.
@@glidercoach yeah.......burning fires in Siberia and Canada as usual....
@@glidercoach why are you even alive at this moment
@@lightyearahead
I've been following and studying the climate for years.
The climate is cyclical and has been terrorizing man since before he walked upright. Ancient cultures sacrificed humans to please the gods over the weather and modern cultures burned women as witches for cooking the weather. All this happened when Co2 levels were low and are well documented.
This proves Co2 plays no role in what the climate does.
The elite are fighting over who will sell energy to the masses. Trillions of dollars are at stake. The problem is there is not a reliable alternative to fossil fuels... and...
...when the world goes 100% green, the weather will still be cyclical and deadly.
All this division and hatred will be for nothing... but some people will become fabulously wealthy.
Stop liking your own posts, it's not a good look...
@@glidercoach FINALLY SOMEONE WITH A BRAIN!!!
Is the older ice that was present in 1984 disappearing because of a change in the currents push the ice away from the nursery as well as warming?
CO2 at 0.04% is a 2,500th of the atmosphere. That means to warm the climate by just 1"C carbon dioxide molecules must capture 2500"C of heat energy. That is bonkers. It also breaks all the laws of thermodynamics.
Methane at 0.00017% is a 600,000th of the atmosphere so it's even more bonkers.
However, the climate is changing. This is because of deliberate geoengineering programmes, in particular ozone thinning away from the poles. Though largely unreported ozone thinning effect is directly observable, this summer you can see a unnaturally bright sun just as we did last year. Under these conditions the pain felt when looking at the sun is not only from the increase in visible light but the much larger increase in infrared. (Look up at the sky and you will see a range of geoengineering operations in progress, these include chemtrail induced cloud or hazing, ripple patterns caused by HAARP installations, bizarre and unnatural cloud formations).
Climate change is a programme to force change in accordance with the implementation of Agenda 21 /2030. Current events demonstrate this transition is well underway and will involve massive population cull through injected nanotech (re transhumanist programme). Agenda 21 also sees the permanent loss of all property rights with the introduction of universal basic income (ref NESARA/GESARA) and has/is being promoted by The World Economic Forum.
'You will own nothing and you will be happy' WEF
In a depopulated world the surviving brainwashed and controlled population will be confined to mega cities. Carbon limits will be used to restrict consumption and liberty. Meanwhile the re-greened wilderness will be the exclusive playground of the ultra rich elite posing as conservationists.
The CO2 hoax amounts to the theft of the world and the enslavement of humanity by a parasitic few.
Welcome to the future!
_________
I have included a debunking of 'accumulated heat' as it is so often used to explain how trace elements, so called 'greenhouse gasses', can warm the planet.
Accumulated heat whilst sounding a reasonable explanation of how heat can build up is rather nothing more than gobbledygook. In fact it shows those using such arguments do not even understand what heat is.
When we measure temperature we are measuring the heat energy a thing is losing. In short heat is a measurement of flow, the transfer of heat energy and this will always be in the direction towards the colder. For this reason a thing can never 'accumulate heat' in the way those advocating CO2 climate change describe. The temperature of a body is the measure of heat output, it can never be greater than the measure of heat input. Output = input. When a thing is warmed it is heated to an equivalent of the heat input. If this input is not maintained it will cool. Those that propose that heat can build up to be hotter than the total measure of heat input at a given time either do not understand what heat is or are being deliberately misleading. To illustrate, an object being heated by a flame can never become hotter than that flame, it's temperature cannot rise inexorably to the temperature of the sun for instance. Heat cannot be accumulated. When we think about it common sense tells us this must be the case.
NASA and even Nobel Prize winning physicists have expounded 'accumulated heat' as the explanation how CO2 is able to warm the atmosphere. They claim that over hundreds of years CO2 has captured heat energy and this heat has 'accumulated' to produce a serious warming effect. As I have just explained, this is totally impossible and fundamentally violates all the laws of thermodynamics. That respected scientists should support such uneducated, unthinking nonsense is disturbing and only reflects that in terms of being able to think clearly about a subject they have no facility or inclination. These are the Dark Ages of science. Belief has outweighed logic or any critical thought. It tells us that we should not unquestioningly accept anything we are told, that experts can be fools.
(NB: be aware of attempts to discard thermodynamics by talking about biology.
Eg. 'It only takes a drop of arsenic to kill a person.'
This would be somewhat desperate, muddled thinking. Clearly biological processes based on the reaction of a cell are not the same as the laws of physics/thermodynamics).
@@doobidoo095 Interesting. Any evidence for these theories?
@@doobidoo095 You appear to be an expert in thermodynamics/physics. I'd like to think there are others who think similarly (on the science claims at least, not sure on the means to control/rob population). I would like to see more variations in thought on this topic in order to form a better opinion on it, but you'd have to keep the thinking to science only. Otherwise, this issue is so politically charged that anyone suggesting counter evidence to the current consensus and slight conjecture will have a harder time convincing those with independent thinking abilities. I feel like there's not enough discussion on other ways to manage potential climate change impacts other political pressure on foreign nations.
@@cgroom23 "You appear to be an expert in thermodynamics/physics."
LOL Based on what would you make that ridiculous statement??? Because he can write a coherent CZcams comment with no references or links whatsoever?? Funny how I wrote comments earlier supporting climate change science and you were all butt hurt that I provided no references. Interesting change of heart you have here. Seems like your willingness to accept climate change denialists words is much different for those who have accepted climate change science. I wonder why that is, lol.
@@doobidoo095 It breaks no such laws. You must bolster your understanding of radiation. These molecules are reflectors that bounce high energy light back to the earth. Even though methane is nearing 2 ppm that still equates to a column of billions of molecules for light to bounce of. If you have ever caught the sun's glare in a mirror, you have experienced the power of reflection. The chemical and hence thermodynamic properties of the compound determine how well it can reflect the incident light.
We're all screwed
It’s not disappearing. It’s fluctuating with northern temperatures. Record is relatively short so we are seeing a recent warm period. The last one was 1940 ish. 1921 the nor west passage opened. But don’t let the facts get in the way of your title.
Finally -- a voice of reason and logic. Thanks. Also, this video forgot to mention that the Gakkel Ridge heats the Arctic Ocean ... czcams.com/video/I_a0exADJtk/video.html
Don't look up!!! lol idiot.
You're spreading omitted data!
You're a... um...er... an historical data spreading, climate... informer.
Funny how all the information changes things.
Also the earth is 4.5 billion years old. Somehow it survived asteroid impacts, volcanic activity, ice ages and who knows what else. And if there really is warming going on, what if it is from fluctations in solar activity?
There is literally no evidence for this
Here’s a good article “Guest post: Piecing together the Arctic’s sea ice history back to 1850” ~Carbon Brief
40 years ago people in my neighborhood use to exit their house from the second floor. When you look at the door your first thought is how do they use it. Then when you see pictures of how much snow we use to get you understand it was so you could get out of your house. We didn't get any snow this year the snowmobile trails were only open for 4 days, 2 days separate months.
This was so helpful thx
Yes but ... they forgot to mention that the Gakkel Ridge heats the Arctic Ocean ... czcams.com/video/I_a0exADJtk/video.html
What is temperature of Arctic sea ice in different spots in different seasons?
The Gakkel Ridge is part of the reason ... czcams.com/video/I_a0exADJtk/video.html
Some villages rely on the river to freeze so they may drive to city for big purchases. I lived in Tuluksak and we had to wait longer on freeze.
The Fading Of The Earth:
How sweet she was with flowing rivers.
Her ice kept us cold made us snow to enjoy.
She gave us the best of cattle and made us strong to live long.
She enjoys giving us fruit but its become a burden.
She can barely work, her body is cold no more, its like fevers on a spring day turned cold in plain summer.
She doesn't know the day, whether it should snow, she's lost track and nobody can tell her this day was summer season 100's of years ago.
She is forsaken as if on a cross, given gall to drink from all the pollutants, from all the blood shed that causes her to be drunk and stagger from all the sorrow.
A mother lost in confusion, how sweet she was, she is fading before us and all we know is her rivers are drying, and she is old and fading.
One last push dear Mother and you shall be like Sarah that old age when all seems lost you have a child, the children of righteousness will be born to you and they shall keep you as you hoped, there will be no more death.
Just hold on we are waiting on a man.
Did you write this? It's very touching and beautiful.
During the time of the Laurentide Ice Sheet were the Poles on a different position?
It pulses like a heart
Yt comments are really depressing...why is it so hard to believe 🙄
It's not hard to believe, the evidence is right there. What's hard to believe is that humans are 100% responsible and it's all bad news, when we know for a fact from geological data that anybody can look at online, that Co2 levels and Global average temperature is at an unusually historic low. Only twice before in Geological history has it ever been this low. Yet the IPCC, etc tell you that this Low is the "normal", when it's clear that there is no normal.
miro.medium.com/max/1320/0*3Vm0copgT8K-pcRm.gif
We need to do something about it
@@Jin-Ro Ah I see, Joseph Seed from CZcams knows more than 97% of climate scientists. Makes sense.
Because we were told by climate scientists that all the arctic sea ice would be gone by now. But that's not even close to happening. Another failed prediction by climate scientists for climate sheep like you to ignore.
@@Gilgamesh54 Not sure where you got your figures from, but I just checked the current arctic sea ice extent from NSIDC and found that right now in March 2021 the sea ice extent is 14.74 million square km. In March 2011 it was about 14.6 million square km. So sea ice extent is about the same as it was ten years ago.
Is there a recent update on this?
You should check google earth.
Data from NOAA (2022 Arctic Report Card) show winter (March) ice coverage has hardly changed since '79, and that the summer (September) coverage trend had stopped declining since 2007. In September 2023, sea ice reached a minimum extent of 4.87 million square kilometers in the Arctic. This is higher than the extent in 2007, which means the Arctic summer sea ice trend is zero for the past 16 years. How inconvenient!
Don’t let FACTS get in the way of socialist pseudoscience.
Climate change denier detected. Its not about coverage but volume and density. I seen the video with my own EYES and it is obvious the arctic is melting...
A human lifetime, even 200 years, is too short a period to make conclusions.
MuchAdoAboutClimate
4.5 Billion Years of the Earth’s Temperature
We only have data from a very short time period.
Would be interesting to see the last 3000 years :)
It's inevitable but very real
Core samples from Antarctica will give you this data you wish, for 3000 years and a lot more (as in like hundreds of thousands of years). I'd strongly recommend you look into that
@@XSFx5and how old is the earth? Only a few thousand years old you say…?
@@frisky_dart7273 They didn't say anything about the Earth being only a few thousand years old. Use your eyes and read instead of making shit up.
The Vostok core samples showed that are warming preceded CO2 levels by an average of 600 to 800 years. This debunked Al Gore’s rubbish claims that carbon dioxide levels were causing warming.
Although we've had satellite data only since the early 70s, there is Arctic ice data that goes back at least to the 1920s as a result of airplane and ship surveys. That historical data suggests Arctic sea ice cycles between periods of high ice coverage and lower ice coverage. Data tells us that Arctic ice annual minimums were high back in the 20s and 30s then dropped to a minimum around 1955 then increased to a maximum in 1979 then decreased till 2012. Since 2012 the Arctic sea ice annual minimum (which occurs in early September) is on the upswing. However, when the Danish meteorology service reported significantly higher Arctic sea ice minimums for Sept 2021, a media firestorm resulted. The service then spent several days rewriting their satellite data algorithm - so the increasing Arctic sea ice minimum suddenly disappeared.
So they started the graph they publicize widely with 1979 data - the year the cycle hit its maximum. Then when data showed the Arctic sea ice minimum to be rebounding they redid the algorithm. Seems like there just might be a pattern of dishonesty here.
The good news is that ice does not lie ... woke "climate scientists" do.
The pattern of dishonesty is your own troll.
Bro what… lol, I definitely can’t ask you to source this info because apparently it’s been “deleted”.
Climate change must be your magnificent passion, because idk who tf sits around all day waiting for Arctic satellite picture updates…
@@energydriver46 Here's a graph showing ice extent since 1850 from a published paper. The graph shows a cyclical pattern. It's a little misleading since it ends in 2005. Arctic sea ice minimums continued to decline somewhat until 2012 and have been somewhat larger since then.wattsupwiththat.com/2021/01/24/study-shows-arctic-sea-ice-reached-lowest-point-on-modern-record-in-the-1940s-not-today/
@@kirklaird8345 Wow, you think that's a reputable source? I spent two minutes on the homepage and it's literally full of climate change deniers. Going to need a source from NASA or an actual real organization, not that cesspit you linked.
Lol, I did a little more googling and it turns out that website was created by a climate change denier. You're either an idiot who believes in that shit or you're just an idiot who fell into a trap. Either way, stop pushing that garbage website.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watts_Up_With_That%3F
In 2018 I was living in a Himalayan foothills village which gets all its water from snow melt, when it ran out of water for the first time.
*_I didn't know it was that bad_*
The last 2 seasons have had more ice. The next season, September 2019, looks to have even more ice. Not so bad.
It's worse than u think start making plans to migrate to mid east places soon I'm looking at a dry lake inside 2 years
@Douglas Kubler How can you predict 5 months ago what the Arctic Ice will be like in September 2019? Climatologists will not do that -- but there has been a continuing downward trend in Arctic Ice since 1970. It will disappear -- the only question is when will that occur. Disappearance in mid-Summer (September) appears very likely within the next 3 years.
It's not bad at all. NOAA surveys show almost the entire arctic ocean is covered in ice. Do a Bing.com search arctic ice. Look at the current images provided by NOAA. To add there were times in the past before the industrial age during warm periods when you could sail in the arctic ocean. I'll start to worry arctic ice melting when the the elite climate alarmists put up their beach front homes for sale.
@@DouglasKubler Dude, you should be forced into a reeducation camp for that sort of bullshit propaganda.
Since the description extrapolates thickness from age, I assume the sensor or satellite looks at age rather than thickness. So, how exactly is age defined, how does this differentiation of ice age happen?
Ice age is defined by a clock, where 60 seconds is one minute, and 60 minutes is one hour, and 24 hours is one day, and 365 days is one year. Perhaps your grade school children could help you with these simple concepts. The differentiation of ice age occurs when you have ice form at different points on the calendar. In our current reality, everything doesn't happen at the same time. Are you from a different reality?
@@DirtFlyer First, thank you for contributing to the reasons social media has such a miserable opinion. Secondly, too bad you didn't understand the gist of my question. Perhaps someone with less need to magnify their feelings of self-importance could. Finally, keep to dirt, and leave the answering to others.
@@granitfog Maybe if your question wasn't so incredibly stupid and incoherently written, somebody would have answered it in the last 4 months. Try getting a real education and maybe some psychological help before you try writing a comment here again.
@@DirtFlyer Congratulations, you succeeded. You are in the running for the social medial douche bag award.
@@granitfog And you have won the lifetime achievement award for being a dunderhead fool.
Vidéo super intéressante, très instructive !!
Pity they didn't have satellites in the periods when the arctic was ice free and the times when greenland was green, it would be good to see all those people living where the ice is now
The ice is growing.
Ice sheet increasing ,we are in a solar minimum
I wanna see the ice sheet now
Nasa and discovery are the best researcher
The ice sheet of September 2019 shows growth.
It grows and shrinks naturally but because of global warming it is melting at a faster pace
Wait! It was suppose to have disappeared 2 years ago?
Yes, that's what NASA predicted, but they were wrong as usual. NASA also told us lower Manhattan would be underwater by now.
@@dtz1000 newspaper accounts from 80 years ago predicting the same thing. I trust historical precedent more than I do computer models that suggest solar activity is stable.
electroverse.net/storm-gloria-brings-heavy-snow-to-spain-killing-at-least-3/
It wasn’t
@@dtz1000 they didn’t predict any of that
Thank you for the correct pronunciation.
Thanks a lot
the arctic ocean was trying to bring asia and America together
So we are back to about 100 years ago, also very little ice around, read some history and old newspapers and come back when you have something new to tell.
No we are not back to about 100 years ago
i thought when all this ice melted it was supposed to be world wide ciaos, flooding everywhere, all the freshwater destabilize the ocean currents ,weather etc.
NASA was actually an ocean company before ww2 it wasnt till later they focused on space
Wow, what a intresting angle to observe our planet. She seems so small when has flown on jets between continents many times. The ice is melting, it seems to me that nothing can be done about it. In any case, it is looking incredibly stunning.
Start with not flying! That would take off 8%
We simply don't seem to be willing to save our own asses from a living hell.
@@philipm3173 Start with getting the elitist's to give up there mega jets and Yachts, They can lead the way in reducing their carbon offset first. While the small majority of people will get to fly on a short flight once a year. The ELITE will travel almost daily on private jets. Wake up people
We can only save the earth if we destroy the humans...
@@philipm3173pffft, geo engineering and Carbon Capture and Storage will easily solve those problems in the future.
Humans made it happen and if nothing is done it will all get much worse much faster.
Let’s see the satellite pics from 2019/2020, the Arctic made a pile of ice this last winter!
Go onto google earth and type in North Pole it’s actually shocking
I am in the Arctic every year and the 2018/19-2019/20 winters made a record amount of ice.
Anyone interested in the newest study on the loss of Arctic Sea Ice should look up the newest update on this topic to see where we stand now! Look up Time Trend of Arctic Sea Ice Extent by Allan Astrup Jensen.
It all fluctuates, more so now that we have a geomagnetic pole excursion. Why is this not on the front of the scientists minds instead of the .04% of the atmosphere that is being blamed for the fluctuations we are witnessing?
What they don't mention is the "Antarctic" had been getting bigger, and Polar Bear population is very much up. Nope can't ruin the dogma
Antarctica isn’t getting bigger, sea ice is remaining constant
NASA ...Never a straight Answer!
According to experts it shouldhave gone by now but its still here?
@@martinbrandom2654 flat earthiers say the same thing…so do people who deny the moon landings
Well I believe that was true!
It is👍
May be
In 2017 and 2018, Greenland gained 1.04 Gigatons (1.04 Trillion tons) of ice. Funny how this was not reported in the media...
In 2021, Greenland *gained* more ice *during the melt season* than any year ever documented and the Antarctic had above average ice.
This was also oddly not reported... 🤔
BUT WAIT BUT WAIT WHERE IS SANTA HES SUPPOSED TO BE IN THIS GLOBE
@@glidercoach Sources?
Actually it grows and shrinks every year about to same size back and forth through winter to summer
It's losing mass by 12% per decade.
Just watching new videos, all the ice is back plus some.
That's just obviously untrue and it doesn't show well that old ice is disappearing so the ice is getting thinner and more seasonal.
FYI the Earth is over 4.5 billion years old, has survived asteroid impacts, volcanic activity, an ice age and who knows what else. But, let's focus on 30 years which is essentially not even a millisecond in the grand scheme of things.
I'm assuming you keep reposting this because you think you have an intellectual thought/opinion but all you're doing is supporting the cause and reinforcing the monumental threat of global warming being displayed in this video. Think about it for a sec... if this happened in such a tiny "not even a millisecond" of a sample size like you keep saying, imagine what happens in 100 years, 1,000 years, 1 billion years, etc.
"...oh, but we'll all be dead by then so who cares! Not my problem!"
@@alfiea5 the elites have been trying to scare everyone with this stuff for decades. This video will put the whole debate in perspective czcams.com/video/Q1OreyX0-fw/video.html
We weren't around for those 4.5 billion years. We are here now and our environment is changing to the point where the majority of us (or rather our children) won't survive. It's so weird you'd rather bury your head in the sand.
@@GuardianSoulkeeper but how did we get here after such devastation on Earth? Almost makes you think if the same devastation happened again, life would still eventually come back. And if humans are the root cause of the Earth's destruction, then wouldn't it be a good thing for us to be wiped out? The bottom line is no matter what we do - even if we completely quit driving, flying, consuming and live in mud huts, eventually the Earth will be destroyed anyway. It's 100% guaranteed.
So one year later where is the update (NSIDC) showing the extent is just under the 30 year average in most places... and actually past the 30 year average in others? Same as it was 40 years ago.
You do realize that a 30 year average wouldn't reach back to 40 years ago, right? The averages move as time moves. So if the ice is just below the 30 year avg now, then in five years the new 30 year avg will be lower, so ice in the future may be still just below the 30 year avg, but that will equate to less than it is now. And so on and so on. If you want to make a comparison, you need to do it with the OLD averages.
@@theonionpirate1076 The 30 year average they use is 1981-2010. Which started 40 years ago. 1979 was century high ice. Which also happens to be where all charts you see posted for "melting" start.
@@ColoradoHiker What's your source that 1979 was century high ice? Even if it were, see Kinnard et al 2011 for a reconstruction of Arctic ice over the last 1500 years. We all know the Northern hemisphere experienced slight cooling from 1940 to just about 1979, so it would actually make sense for the ice to have been increasing in those decades, which refutes the idea that it's all just natural variation. And the rapidity with which it's shrinking now is incredible. I mean, hopefully you watched the video.
@@theonionpirate1076 2 sources... The Department of Energy graphed the earlier version and NOAA took over in 1973 or 1974. Merge them together and 1979 was the highest ice. Have you ever seen any ice graph put forth from any warming person that did not start in 1979? I haven't. If there is data from 1973 why are those 6 years left out? Because the narrative falls apart and today is similar to 1974. Here is the full data that is in the 1990 IPCC report if you want to verify (that they now omit) ... realclimatescience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Screen-Shot-2017-02-14-at-5.53.39-AM-down.gif
@@theonionpirate1076 MASIE tracked Arctic sea ice extent since it started in 2006 pbs.twimg.com/media/DuTiJQUWsAYPb-o?format=jpg&name=medium
It´s melting more and more since the ice age. Don´t worry, It´s cyclic.
The Ice used to cover from the north pole to Florida, and from the south pole to São Paulo.
Just the tropics were a little warmer, just like New York in the autumm.
But not as fast as now.
And you can also check this:
Global temperature anomalies from 1880 to 2017
czcams.com/video/Z4bSxb5THm4/video.html
Dude, you should be forced into a reeducation camp for that sort of bullshit propaganda.
@Cândido: You're correct, climate change is cyclic. Once we have overheated our planet and become extinct -- similar to the dinosaurs -- Earth should regress into another Ice Age. The important part is this: ONCE WE HAVE MADE OURSELVES EXTINCT ...
@@420......... How dare you! It'll stole my dreams!!
@@unclehud5033 what's your proposal - keep your lifestyle and I keep underdeveloped?
I can't wait to see what the September arctic ice minimums will be for this year and next year....I bet they will go near 3 or even below 3 next year, it will certainly open some eyes for sure.
After growing through the fall and winter, Arctic sea ice appeared to reach its annual maximum extent on March 6, 2023. This year's end-of-winter extent was the fifth lowest in the satellite record maintained by the National Snow and Ice Data Center. [NASA Earth Observatory]
In total, sea ice covers about 34 million square kilometers (13 million square miles) of Earth, or about three times the area of Canada. This equates to roughly 9 percent of the world’s oceans being covered by sea ice during at least part of the year. 0:30 [NSIDC]
The IPCC report concluded that the Arctic would lose its summer ice in the 2040s in intermediate and high emissions scenarios, but the new research advances that by a decade into the 2030s. [The Guardian]
@@GjaP_242this will not age well. This no ice by so and so date has been predicted so many times in the past. Insane that they get away with the same lie decade after decade and people believe it.
Total reverse this winter
Nice of you to show Canada’s north west passage, apparently in this video, open for business too bad us Canadians dont live here and know its still frozen and un passable unlike this video shows.
Pure deception , hail to Tony Heller a true scientist and not a demagog like the lie,s of Nasa .
A lot of missing ice along greenland too
The Koch Brothers have successfully spread so many Lies about Global Warming, so that they could continue to sell Oil. Those who have been fooled find it almost impossible to admit the deception.
@@dnickaroo3574 you do realize we use oil for more than just fuel right? Even if it was proven we would still use oil to produce plastics, polymers, explosives, lubricants, ointments and 1000's of other products that get used everyday. Take away fossil fuels and millions will die of exposure and starvation.
@Nick Bierman I realise that our civilisation is highly dependent on Oil, and i feel that it should be used judiciously -- not wasted unnecessarily.
Why didn't you show the last two years?
Dude, you should be forced into a reeducation camp for that sort of bullshit propaganda.
The video was released a year+ ago, they only show completed data, not bullshit propaganda like you try to use.
@@420......... I agree. Let's lock him up for his wrongthink. What should the penalty be for his thoughtcrime, comrade? Is 6 years enough?
What do you think when you poot caarbin in it you git possind just like a sigger et
Wow the sea levels must swamping all those beach fronts
Are you stupid? Arctic ice does not contribute to sea level rise because it is already floating in the sea.
Only ice which currently resides on land contributes to sea level rise.
This ice is already IN the ocean. Land glacial melt is producing sea level rise. Sea levels have risen 8-9 inches since 1880 and are due to rise much further and faster in the 21st century. www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-sea-level#:~:text=Global%20average%20sea%20level%20has,4%20inches)%20above%201993%20levels
would be good to see from 2016 to right now since the ice is almost gone...
Yes, did the satellites all fall in 2016? Why no data after that?
@@maliciousmike8440 because the ice is now growing at historic rates. Since 1994 we lost 28 trillion tons of ice on the arctic but now 32 trillion tons have grown back. The arctic is now reaching farther than ever before.
@@acevfx2923 source? Because the ice sheets didn’t suddenly grow like that. In both poles (more so in the arctic) we have seen consistent ice loss. Don’t lie and spread misinformation.
@@PremierCCGuyMMXVI they didn't suddenly grow. Sea ice has been growing for years on end. The temperature on the Antarctic hasn't changed for 7 decades, hell it even cooled a little bit despite that one region with an active volcano. Global warming = ice age. As the glaciers melt and the fresh water turns into sea ice. Sea ice is thinner but grows and disappears faster making it cover a larger surface where more light gets reflected causing deep sea to cool and changes in saline levels take place. When the deep see is cooler that ice closer to land will grow deeper. All in all More water displacement equals slightly higher sea levels. Sea levels have been rising for thousands of years however the last 200 years haven't accounted for any significant amount comparatively to the thousands of years before that. Hell, if I remember correctly some 14.000 years ago the ice on Antarctica was as good as gone.
We are still in the Holocene Ice Age. Cyclical increasing solar flare activity can be directly correlated with the slight increases in temperature. The CO2 can according to the laws thermodynamics not be solely accountable for the increase in heat across the globe. Evidently the increase in CO2 is doing wonders for are vegetative life. The sahar is turning green again.
Just look at raw data and skip the copius amounts of articles based on findings in climate models. Climate is another word for everything. And scientists simply cannot fit every factor in to their models. That's why they all work with their own ignorant versions of models. The politicians decided on one model that best suited their agenda, a model that says exactly what they need the people to hear inorder to draw votes. I mean hell, Trump exited the paris accords and drastically decreased emissions, while biden signed back into the accord and emissions are up and china is still exempted under that same accord up until 2030. Last years china built more coal plants than Australia has in total. These are the results of the same models that constantly alert you that we have lost 30 trillion tons of ice in 3 decades, but have no factors that consider the amount of ice growth.
@@acevfx2923 actually sea ice in the arctic has been falling considerably, Antarctic sea ice has been constant. Antarctica has been getting warmer but due to the oscillation known as the SAM, it hasn’t been warming as fast as the arctic. Global warming doesn’t mean ice age. Firstly we are currently in an ice age known as the quaternary. You are probably thinking glacial cycle. Secondly that won’t happen for another 20,000 years due to Milankovitch cycles. Thirdly (Atlas Pro made a video about this) yes a shut down of the AMOC could cause North Atlantic cooling. We haven’t really seen that and any cooling would be wiped away by the warming effect of CO2. Global temperatures so far have risen 1.2°C since records began and should warm as much as 4°C by 2100. A climate earth hadn’t seen in many millions of years. Sea levels have been constant for at least the past several thousand years after the rapid sea level rise falling the collapse of the North American and Eurasian ice sheets following the end of the last glacial maximum. Sea levels are now rising rapidly (sea levels rose much faster in the 20th century than compared with previous decades) and could rise several feet by the end of the century flooding major cities across the world. Antarctica was not ice free 14,000 years ago. Firstly that’s impossible because we were still in the past glacial cycle than so earth was 4°C to 7°C cooler than today. And secondly the Antarctic Ice sheet has been on Earth for 30+ million years. I need you to cite your sources because I really don’t know where you are getting your info from.
The Holocene ice age isn’t a thing. Solar activity has been declining (we were recently in a “grand solar minimum”. Pretty weird how climate denialist can’t even agree whether or not the sun is getting dimmer or brighter because it won’t fit their narrative) yet global temperatures have warmed 1°C in the past 35 years. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and has been known since 1896. If it isn’t than explain why Earth was significantly hotter in the past and thawed from past ice ages when solar activity has been increasing at a constant rate the past four billion years known as the young faint sun paradox. (despite some down ticks here or there like we are currently seeing, sort of like going up a steep mountain with little down slopes). Sure it’s good it’s greening the earth, it’s not good it’s rapidly warming the earth casting more heat waves, droughts, floods, habitat destruction, rising seas, etc. And lands further north are less fertile. Also Simon Clark has a great video about she co2 is making plants less healthy.
Climate models have been proved to be accurate and scientists understand the basics of climate science and know enough to know humans are causing global warming. Trump did not cut emissions and the Paris Agreement is nessesary to prevent run away global warming. China is leading the world in renewable energy unfortunately not the US.
We have been losing billions of tons of ice a year, these aren’t models, these are observations.
I suggest watching Potholer54
One of the advantages of all this is that it opens up new shipping routes.
Yay capitalism.
@@SachinGanpat Oh is communism the solution to everything? We had enough with Berlin Walls and dictatorships.
@@skibididopyesdop But that wasn't true communism? It's like saying China is communist. It's not.
@@sprite4800 China is communist, the only thing that changed is that they allowed business. If you actually think China isn’t, then there’s something you misunderstand. And I said „Oh is communism the solution?“ because he said „Yay capitalism“, that seemed to me like sarcastic joke that capitalism is good
@@skibididopyesdop china is literally capitalist, ever heard of state capitalism. And even more evidence that china is capitalist is that it has the 2nd most billionaires in the world, the indoctrination must have gotten into you good.
I heard this a week ago. If it melted. Where is the sea rise. I live at the sea. Nothing has changed. ??
I Love this show.
Key word being 'show' :-)
Notice they started the animation at the height of the global cooling scare when ice was at it's maximum.
The climate is cyclical and there is nothing to worry about. We're going back to a cold cycle.
That’s the danger in videos like this. It appears to have stated at THAT specific time and then stopped in 2016. Why? It’s like NASA (who has never falsified its climate data before 😏) limited this time-widow for some reason.
Also interesting is there is NO mention of what season ANY of those pics are in. I’d think that VERY relevant.
Nice job opining on something you know absolutely nothing about.
@@maliciousmike8440 They put the exact month and year of each picture on the top left of the screen idiot.
@@DirtFlyer
Prove what I said was wrong.
Take your time...
I'm here for the funny comments and the lack of record cold temperatures reporting.
Thank you I will use this video on my site.
It will reappear again in the next ice age
I know what happened to sea ice, it migrated to the Russian side. Have you seen films of the Russian side, plenty of sea ice, cold temperatures and plenty of Polar Bears.
no way.. you can see the google earth (time lapse) russia is lossing ice to
@@cmcibils This isn't from satellites. it is ground level. Its has so many Polar Bears that it would be wise to have Sarah Palin on speed dial.
Club Med Arctica. Who's interested in investing?
This has been ongoing for 10,000 years.
Actually, No. The warm peak of this inter-glacial period, in which civilization developed, was 6,000 years ago. Earth was cooling until the industrial Revolution increased CO2 by half... and rising rapidly. This is unnatural and extremely rapid warming is counter to natural cycles.
I'm russian and I like it.
Are you sunbathing in Siberia?
You're a backwater piece of shit.
@@420......... Chilllll
@@johnperic6860 He's a brainwashed westerner, that's why he's aggressive. Needs the elite media to think for him.
In 1922, Stefansson described Arctic ice between the North Pole and Alaska as "thin and rotten". We're just seeing normal variation here.
Also, in 1937 Stefansson noted temperatures over 100 degrees F on the Yukon and the Arctic.
If this was made in 2018 why did the data end in 2016? Because there have been dramatic increases since then.
Prove it instead of using Facebook logic
Anybody notice the placement of the land masses
the melting and freezing of sea ice DO NOT change sea level!!!
No but it's a good indicator that the planet is warming
Actually it does to a small degree. The melting of ice actual decreases the space it occupies. Like a glass of ice can overflow the top where as liquid it remained in the cup.
Less than 50 years worth of data makes this meaningless. The 1920's were very hot years. If satellites could have started keeping these records in the 1920's you would see ice increasing. On a larger scale, the Earth was warmer around 10,000 BC than it is today. So for our interglacial warm period we are currently enjoying the Earth has been gradually cooling.
None of that is true. The 1920s weren’t warm, sea ice was not lower than today in the 1920s, and a new study from November 2021 found that current global temperatures are the highest in at least 10,000 years (no time in the past 10k years were warmer than today) and contrary to previous evidence, global temperatures have been stable not slightly cooling the past 6,000 years. So the Holocene Climate Optimum wasn’t as warm as previously thought.
like the breath of the earth
Oh no!
Starts saying satellite observations began in 1978. Actually it was 1972. Ask yourself why are they pretending those six years observations don't exist.
I was under the impression we started using satellite data in 1978-9
@@urbanothepopeofdeath Take a look at the 1990 IPCC report.
will that tell me when we started using satellite temps ?
Alarmists seem to like to start their graphs and observations at the end of cycling cooling periods so that they can get the best "earth is burning up" bang for the buck.
@@urbanothepopeofdeath Here is the actual IPCC report look on page 224 figure 7.2 (a). I believe it was 1973 when we started satellite data. They ignore the first years because it doesn't fit in the narrative. 1979 was century high ice and you can see the spike up on the graph. The alarmists pick long term graphs and don't show the whole thing. Cherry pick starting points. Just like the Amazon fires the graphs they were showing started I think in 2012 that shows fires going up. But if you look back just 17 years it was the 7th or 8th most acreage burned in 17 years. Without data manipulation the whole "alarmism" thing would be done. www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf
My state in America (Texas) was mostly under an ocean Millions of years ago... So how do we know that this is 100% our fault or if we are only a small contributor and we are coming to age where the world changes again? Egypt was a Forest/Jungle, the Sahara was a massive ocean, and Australia once had a massive inland sea. All before we did anything.
I dont understand the logic people use "I don't believe its our fault so fuck it" like will it kill you to care for the earth? Or do people just care too much about "getting fooled by the government" to do anything? So lets say this IS all fake and conspiracies by NASA, would you risk destroying the earth just to prove them wrong?
I believe the speed that its happening at - texas being under water or even the most deadly extintions in the earths history took millions of years, to happen. We are now seeing large scale change in the period of 100 years. Additonally, the correlation, and known causation of large amount of carbon being spewed into the atmosphere affecting the temperatures.
TLDR: Past climate change happened over millions and millions of years, we are seeing global change before our eyes with known causes associated to it.
Because the rate of change between when we started industrializing and now is far more drastic than the normal change of the planet
And millions of years ago CO2 levels were much higher then today and caused Earth to be in a hot house. That’s why we shouldn’t raise co2 levels again. Humans evolved in the mild conditions of the Holocene interglacial.
It has to be my gas powered weed eater that did it.
the Antarctica ice sheet is getting larger....or has zero shrinkage. how do we explain that?
Dude, you should be forced into a reeducation camp for that sort of bullshit propaganda.
@mcambl61: Antarctica is not an ice sheet, it is a continent of land. Of course it hasn't shrunk. Go back to the fifth grade and pay attention this time, or read something based on fact. Ignore hate-filled radio broadcasts or CZcams propaganda.
@@unclehud5033 well now, that is quite a bit of arrogant blather. Here is the Wikipedia dumbed down version for you sunshine :
"The Antarctic ice sheet is one of the two polar ice caps of the Earth. It covers about 98% of the Antarctic continent and is the largest single mass of ice on Earth. It covers an area of almost 14 million square kilometres and contains 26.5 million cubic kilometres of ice. Wikipedia"
Now, if you want to get into the details, and talk about artic ice caps versus an ice sheet that also covers a land mass. However, the sea ice in Antarctica is not shrinking.
Now explain that, in the context of the climate change Armageddon that keeps getting peddled.
Educate yourself instead of arrogant insults boy.
Increased moisture due to warmer air accounts for additional snow fall in some areas. The longer term trend is toward melting and increased calving.
When you realize that the ice is growing more on one side and then melting on the other.
Say more
no it does not.
Dude, you should be forced into a reeducation camp for that sort of bullshit propaganda.
꙲ : You should never be let out unsupervised in public, and NEVER without a straitjacket
Antarctic ice is actually increasing ... earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/sensing-our-planet/unexpected-ice
How awful is this and how natural is this process?
it's really bad...... I mean REALLY bad....
it's not natural....
Google 800000 yr CO2 graph
czcams.com/video/FnGglbIphGw/video.html
@@JasonGoldstein78 No it's not. Stop being a part of the propaganda.
0% natural.
99.9% natural. Don't let authoritarian leftists skew facts. The earth is fine and the climate changes naturally on a predictable cyclical pattern.
When I look at google earth, there is no ice on the water. Has it already melted? if so there shouldn’t be any future sea level rise. But maybe Google Earth excludes any ice on water.
In November 2023, arctic sea ice extent (according to NASA's polar satellites) covered 9.66M square km, tied with 2006 for the 7th lowest amount (of course, that's comparing November 2023 which is not going to be the greatest amount for the winter 2023-2024 because December is colder = more sea ice, so it's a bit like comparing the temperature of a freezer set to 0º C and a freezer set to 0º F and asking which is colder).
In addition, this video is from 5 years ago, which means it's out of date. And the satellite record only goes back 45 years. While that may sound like forever, it's not, because the planet is 4+ billion years old. Anyone know what the Arctic sea ice extent was back in 1935? Nope. How about 100 years ago? 200 years ago? 500 years ago? There are glaciers retreating in Greenland that are revealing trees and evidence of human habitation buried until now - which means temperatures were a lot warmer in the last 1,000 years since the Vikings first colonized Greenland than they are now. Because #ScienceIsHard and #ScienceRequiresIntelligence
Climate change is real science: czcams.com/video/E6bVBH9y5O8/video.html
??? 0º F is 32º F colder than 0º C.
Anyway, see: NASA Vital Signs, Global temperature" There is always yearly variability but the overall trend is less ice MASS globally.
@@lrvogt1257 The overall trend INCLUDING ANTARCTICA is not less ice MASS globally. Anyway, understand that measuring Arctic sea ice in NOVEMBER is always going to show LESS than DECEMBER OR JANUARY because NOVEMBER isn't cold enough. But hey, I understand that physics and thermodynamics are difficult subjects.
@@karlostj4683 : Ice is measured all year and the globe is losing on average 420 billion gigatonnes of ice per year from just Greenland and Antarctica. Arctic ice extent is seasonal but it too is getting smaller each decade. SEE: NASA, Vital Signs, Ice sheets
It's happened before with no human Input and it will happen again with or without human input! Earths climate has changed/evolved since liquid water formed on its surface!
Yeah, except that the climate change is supposed to be cooling the earth around now. The fact that its heating up instead means we fucked it
@@thehusshisht1708 Yeah, except that over the last 69 months 60 have been cooler then the 100 year average!
@@mobeydick37 you dumbass that's precisely why you're wrong, you need a bigger sample to measure temperature difference, 69 months as large as it is simply is too small to measure overall climate change
@@thehusshisht1708 60 out of 69 months with the average temperature being .17degrees lower is sure as hell not getting hotter regardless of the how much longer you want to stretch it out! Over the last 23 years where I live there have been 5 temperature records set all have been record lows all have been in the July or August and all have been in the last 3 years. Face it sheeple it's not getting hotter!
@@mobeydick37 and in the middle east it used to be extremely rare to hit 50 Celsius, now everyday it's 50 degrees in the summer, do you see what's happening? The problem isn't temperature, it's climate change
Greenland, not doing your part to keep the ice from escaping!
Seriously though, can we block the ice from leaving?
We could build a wall or something to prevent collapsing ice sheets from floating out
Its gone
Global reform via nuclear threat.
@George Hartfield Sarcasm, dude, showing that walls don't work.
Wall between US and Mexico = does not keep out illegal immigrants. Wall between East and West Germany = worked better, but came down amid public outcry.
Matthew Heal Greenland should build a ice wall...
There's still ice at the poles.
Yes... but 420 billion gigatonnes per year less.
Is Miami Fla. flooding?
Should be. Been doing it ever since the area was settled. Flooding dependent on storms intensity, direction, and wind. Oh, and certain tide periods tend to flooding.
Yes
yes and some research has shown that by 2090 miami would be entirely covered by water and and it would be the next atlantis
animation! Try looking at all the actual data, and you will find there is no statistical difference in the mean amount of ice. NASA trying to pull a fast one!
For what purpose?
@@nominus1138 FOR MUH CLIMATE CHANGE, What the hell dude, are you fucking kidding?
@@nominus1138 Muh anthropomorphic climate change, muh taxes, muh STOP USING FUEL to prosper... fucking awaken sheeptard.
@@Ban_Usury_Worldwide how about you answer my question.... For what purpose would NASA be lying about the science?
@@nominus1138 They are lying to progress the climate change agenda. There is TONS of money behind it and tons of potential for governments to raise taxes as well as other power grabs. czcams.com/video/4yrURiXtVYk/video.html
czcams.com/users/TonyHeller1videos
See you all in 20 years with polar ice being relatively the same....
@White Moogle The Koch Brothers have successfully spread so many Lies about Global Warming, so that they could continue to sell Oil. Those who have been fooled find it almost impossible to admit the deception.
@@dnickaroo3574 who are the coke brothers?
@@aaroncourtney4850 it's the Koch brothers, and now just one brother, Charles Koch, since his brother died. He is the billionaire owner of Koch Industries. He is a libertarian who has funded climate denialism for decades.
@@DirtFlyer never heard of him, sounds to me like there’s more lies about “climate change” than there is about “climate change denial” pushed on the masses in mainstream media
How can you logically come to such a braindead fucking conclusion. Do you even have eyes? or a brain for that matter?
The glacier Ice melts in 5,000 years..
FIRE dominates!
Как говорится: - "Пар костей не ломит." или " Ошпаренных меньше чем отмороженных." Так что тепло - это хорошо!
как перевести на русский этот ролик - хочу поделиться с русскоязычными,,,,
Значит засуха, потопы, штормы, ураганы, лесные пожары это тоже хорошо?
я угараю. глобального потепления нету, да и то тепло что сейчас есть кончится уже через 10-500 лет.
Amazing how things change so quickly; the ice fields are more extensive than they have been for a long time. And the Polar Bear population is on the up! And all in the 3 years since this "information".
While the ice may cover a larger area during sporadic winter seasons, the volume of ice continues to decline. As this video shows very clearly, older ice is disappearing steadily over the years. While older ice averages 3 meters thick, the new ice is on average less than a meter thick, and is much more prone to melting and disintegration in the summer. This is what right wing media fails to mention in their climate change denial news stories.
The Arctic hit 100° f in the summer of 2021. When it's gone you're going to say to yourself: "WOW! I am stupid af! I thought my IQ was at least 85!" Then, you will die.
What are you talking about ...yeah don't worry it's rebounding as we speak.and the bears... They're a loving the nice warm temperatures.
If so much ice melted, why sea level is still the same and hasn't rise an inch?
This ice is already IN the ocean. Land glacial melt is producing sea level rise. Sea levels have risen 8-9 inches since 1880 and are due to rise much further and faster in the 21st century. www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-sea-level#:~:text=Global%20average%20sea%20level%20has,4%20inches)%20above%201993%20levels.
Sea ice, as the name states, is already in the water. If you have a glass filled with ice cubes and fill it with water to the top, The melting ice will not raise the level.
Land Ice is like taking more ice from the fridge and dropping it in a full glass. It's when glaciers on land melt and run to sea that sea level rises.
Ice have less density than water.
Imagine what might be under that ice that they don’t want us seeing??
Who is"they"? 😂
@@Simp_Zone the enemy of OP
And now? Oh, right, massive gains so no reporting on that.
I think what we're witnessing here is an ever changing climate... with of course the understanding that this animation represents a minuscule blip on the planetary scale of time. It would also have been more interesting and more relevant if Antarctic ice coverage was presented over the same time period. Highly doubtful we'll get that from NASA though!
hey dummy...... Google and check out the fake 800000 yr CO2 graph
You're right. It is a minuscule amount of time. Changes like these in the animation should only take place over hundreds or thousands of years...not a few decades. This is a what happens with a quickly warming planet. We get quickly melting ice.
Western high Arctic chukchi sea region ak49 coast no more Ice pile up pressure ridges main ice sheet all melting at a rapid pace now
On Apple Maps, it’s gone 😢
The records started in 1978. The 70s were the coldest decade on record in over a hundred years so....
Actually, the instrumental temperature record began in 1880. Every decade before the 1970s was cooler. 1909 was the last record cold year and it's been warmer each decade sisnce except for a warm blip in the early 1940s. Satellite observations of Arctic Ice began in 1979.
See: "NASA Vital Signs Global Temperature"
That might finally be true in 2078
Crap
Isnt this called summer and winter ?
omg... No.
See : "NASA Vital Signs" and look at each topic.
القطب الشمالي ياخذ الماء ويعطيه اما القارة الجنوبية فهي التي تعطي اكثر بكثير مما تأخذ الماء في الشتاء وذلك لانها تفلق مرتفعات وقطع كبيرة تجاه البحر وكذلك لانها تراكمت في الجزء الجنوبي عبر التاريخ ولأنها بين المحيط الهادي حيث يكون البحر اقل حرارة من القارات الشمالية والمؤثرة بحرارتها على القطب الشمالي ، الارض تتوازن ولكن لانعلم متى ستتوازن هذه المرة بسبب وجود الكائن المؤثر الطارئ وهو الإنسان
No you can't plant a bomb here
@@1Juanse1 You must have a peanut brain.
This is all lies and exaggerations. There has been no point where the ice was as low as this graphic shows.
I mean you can Google earth it