The Worst "Modern" Tank
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 05. 2023
- Charity: sp4ukraine.org/
The Soviet T-62 was a capable machine when it first was introduced in the 1950s. How does it stack up today, against the most modern Western main battle tanks such as the M1 Abrams and Leopard 2? The answer: not great. I wanted to post this later but with the Gaijin boycott going on later this week, my hand was kinda forced.
Check the channel "About" section for the link to the creator of my profile picture.
Songs used (in order from first to last):
Command and Conquer: Generals - Makin' A Sweep, Fight For Peace, In The Field, Comanche Down
Halo 3: ODST - Rain (Deference for Darkness)
Sound mods:
Epic Thunder (Pre-release)
Gunner HEAT PC Crew Voices Mod (Personal, go play the game: gunnerheatpc.com/ )
Second channel: / @spookstoon
Patreon: / spookston
Twitter: / spookston
Reddit: /u/spookston
Discord: See my Patreon page.
#warthunder #tanks #tankhistory
The Worst "Modern" Tank - Hry
Charity: sp4ukraine.org/
Day 11 of asking too play the Bt-42
Donate to me i giv to zelensky pls
i love you
Based 🇺🇦
franzJ reference 3:12
Imagine being in a modern M1 Abrams tank thinking you're on top of the world and suddenly you hear Stalin noises and your tank explodes. What a gigachad that Katyusha player is
BM-31, so andryusha.
@@beefyblom fun fact its shell was called Luka for a 18+ poem hero with the shape of THIS THING similar to the shell.
Gigachad-🤖🤖🤖
@@beefyblom It was called both.
@@russman3787 yes
I like how you killed like 3 tanks, didn't lose yours, and only got 37k. The economy for non-premium tanks is brutal...
And it is with a prenium account.
"Only got 37k" man the T-62 only takes like 3k 3500 Sl to repair, he profited a lot
@@wickendiana8310 Ok, if that's the case, then sure.
37k with 3.5k repair cost is very fair. 3 kills is not that much. The sad part is that it requires premium to get there, meaning that without premium you would have profited like 12k instead of 34 doubling the amount of games you should play atleast decently to buy something
@@gabonskaiagadziuka i too think torture is fine and lovely, everyone should stop complaining about getting tortured.
Spookston going from smug disappointment to complete astonishment when the BM-31 got the Abrams was classic.
Props to that BM-31-12 for going against that Abrams AIM lol
Taking current state of WT under consideration I think it's great time for more historical vids.
I have one planned for Friday
agreed
agreed x2
@@Spookston yes!
Affirmative!
Something that was much better was the swing fire which could take it out easily. The swing fire is still the only thing that is safe from the bad changes, meaning it’s the best now…….
Swingfire is the best atgm carrier not debatable
@@Minebrawlzzz The Striker is close behind
That's untill the IT-1 rolls around. It's quite fun to play. As long as you don't get swarmed by enemies during your reload, you're good.
@@alexmaximus9134 Even the reload is quite fast to be honest.
@@murmenaattori6 Park it at the cap, behind some cover, and the reload gets insane!
These line-fillers are seemingly intended as something like an assault gun, but yeah, they're getting pressed into all kinds of roles. The "Oh, we just need a bunker buster." Seems intended to soothe the crews.
Well, tank vs tank encounters are in fact somewhat rare, just like in most wars. It's not giant tank divisions smashing into eachother, it's mostly positional combat involving mainly infantry and artillery and drones, with tanks in support. The HE and machinegun on a tank is always the most important, followed by it's ability to protect against AT weapons, followed by it's ability to penetrate enemy tanks.
I've heard channels that talk to veterans from the Ukrainian side who also stated that tank vs tank encounters, so I don't think it's just Russian cope.
@@whocares427 The problem is that a lot of these older vehicles dont have any thermals, while most Ukranian AT crew do. The fact that tanks can get outranged by infantry is...pathetic to say the least. Then again, having a shit tank is better than no tank, as its still a big ass gun to bring to the battle. T-55s and such will be used as artillery because from what i've heard Russia is running low on 155/152/122mm artillery shells but has plenty of 100mm shells, which these things can fire. Still, can you imagine the US going "ah fuck, guess we'll send in the M60's"?
@@CrazyDutchguys “The fact that tanks can get out ranged by infantry is…pathetic to say the least.”
This reads like someone talking out of their ass, please elaborate?
@@schaddenkorp6977 The T-62's and T-55's being sent into battle don't have thermal optics for the most part. And if they do, they have un-cooled thermal optics, which have effective range of about 600 meters.
In comparison, the AT crews of Ukraine are using cooled thermal optics, which have an effective range of 10 miles, give or take, and allow the AT crews using weapons like the Javelin and NLAW to strike at tanks far outside of their thermal optics range (if they have any), or basically with impunity if said tanks they're engaging don't have thermal optics. Barring getting lucky and the crews (or supporting infantry if they have any) happen to see the attack directly, it's difficult for Russia's tank forces to react and deal with Ukrainian anti tank crews because of this disparity.
Thermal optics are super amazing to have in an environment where the background temperature of the landscape is much colder in general, which makes people and vehicles stick out (being hot in comparison). The landscape of Ukraine is perfect for thermal optic use, in compairson to places like Afghanistan, where the average background temperature is much higher.
Does that explanation suffice?
@@CrazyDutchguysRussia doesn’t have a lack of artillery shells, there are massive stockpiles that haven’t even been touched yet in different regions of Russia.
I've been seeing that same guy in my matches with the BM-31-12 at top tier and every game he'd score 2-3 kills with it. Absolutely based
The guy in that Katyusha is an absolute Chad
I adore this thing, i like ancient vehicles that are heavily modernised to barely keep up with newer ones
Cant wait for russia to bring a chariot with ERA all over it to fight in ukraine
You must be a sucker for centurion and m60
Ah, everything russian
@@user-zn7nd5ti6w modernized m60 goes hard
Cheaper and barely enouth to send a m1 to scrapyard.. and imagine there are still dpr reservists that are schooled on these Things! And the most old crap is moving on ukrainian side there you can even see the t54 t55 t62..
T55s are currently being used as SPGs and artillery as far as I know
When no truck
CNN told me they were using T26s and biplanes.
Pretty sad for the supposedly second best army of the world
@@xi.na_ Smartest American? Now if you would not mind telling me, what happens to a barrel when it is used to shoot a lot of times? If you somehow figure that one out you should understand why they are being used as artillery right now
@@xi.na_ Says the "worlds strongest army"supporter whilst your army has its biggest recruiting chaos
The T-62-M is so fun, slow turret, decent rounds, trolly but not reliable armor, it’s a relic of a top tier that used to be slow and methodical
Day 2 of asking Spookston to play M13 because it's the Falcon of 1.7
M13 mgmc?
Yes the machine gun motor carriage
The british one is better cuz its on better chassis
@@wheet1813 multiple gun motor carriage
@@KumaFall all along I thought it's machine gun :v
hey at least T-55s have APHE which if you sneak around can get you decent side shots
The T-62M1 at its own BR is so good, I just got to Russia 8.7 and I love it
T64A should be better at 9.0 it has autoloader stalinium turret and better speed.
@@nashaigra8973At the cost of no heavy machinegun, no LRF and 4kph reverse speed
@@ougioshino6940
it's still good xD
@@ougioshino6940 Reverse aint a problem there. you will play of the turret most of the time LRF is mostly useless unless ur a gayjin profitmaker premium LVL5 NOOB.
*gets the world's easiest kill ever*
Gaijin: yeah THAT was skill.
Just as a side note, the most likely role for those 50s MBT for russia is artillery. Those tanks actually came with field manual with instruction to do so back then.
Idk why he is saying frontline mbt
plus they got a shit ton of rounds laying around for those
@@kamov52510 Because there’re photos of them blown up?
Definitely, but I have a feeling with Russia's track record in this war that many of the outdated tanks will find themselves in very unfortunate situations. Theory and practice aren't always the same.
@@KY-qx9ipAnd?
You should try out the Ru-251. Its guite a fun tank
2:55 least skilled katyusha crew
They aren't being used as MBTs. Theyre being used as mobile artillery with armor. Like a field gun essentially
With armor 💀
..... the T-62 are used as frontline tanks
@@indeed169 And the first leopards in Ukraine doesnt even saw a russian tank,but they got destroyed 😂😂😂
@@patriktoth3346 okay? And the end of the day its another tank. No one said they are indestructible. Its kinda cringe that you pro russian idiots have to milk this one destroyed Leopard 2A4 because there is no other significant military success since the counter offensive ended in october. Just a reminder that russia lost over 2000 tanks (confirmed by Oryx)
Ukrain vehicle losses : 3556 (includes tanks, ifvs etc)
Russian vehicle losses : 10593(includes tanks, ifvs etc)
But a destroyed Leopard is something special eh? 😂 Dumbass hore go on and celebrate but keep in mind that russia losses are 3-4 times higher.
@@indeed169 be quiet KID!!!! DO AS I SAY
@@bolshevik1017 i'm 23 lol tf are you talking about...
Thank you Mr. Spookston! I appreciate you playing my suggestion and I love the content even when sometimes I don't love the game.
Have you tried the lvkv 9040 ? It apparently is a great flanker and even better anti air
As a huge Swedish Empire enjoyer, I highly recommend it.
i shot a drone out of the air at 9km with 1 shot of my dart, its really nice just think the ready ammo rack sucks
Just wait until after the update when all the cv90's get irst!
Cv90105
@@bigbadlara5304 Majority of CV90105 players have never experienced the wonders of the Swedish tech tree and it honestly shows in their gameplay; properly shit.
I love the clip at 2:08 which practically re-enact that one Abrams that tanks an RPG and immediately points the gun to the cameraman.
T-62 might be old, but as Chieftain said - even a T-54 can take out an Abrams from the side with a well placed shot. Maybe we could get the T-62 with thermals some day.
Well...... There are T-62's with thermals. There are in east Ukraine and used mostly by DPR and LPR. Although Russia uses them too.
@@bamboo7563 "DPR" , "LPR". Can't help but laugh everytime I hear that.
@@bamboo7563They are not used in frontlines, but as armored medium range artillery vehicle.
Spookston they are catually using the old tanks as artillery and infantry suport veicles, not for fighting tanks
From what i read and understood about that is that they are using these tanks as cheap arty units reinforcements, since they got shitload of 100mm stockpiles. The crew also shifts from 4 to 3, since the commander is the platoon arty observer or something. If anyone has more intel about that.
If you didn't know the reason why they are using the T-55 and t-54 because they have useful cannons that can be used for indirect fire like forward artillery in a way.
That and the fact the gun is in an armored turret makes it resistant to drone-dropped grenades. Unlike truck mounted guns.
@@Crosshair84 True people think they are using it to fight m1 abrams and leopards which if funny because those would be destroyed before they see actual tank combat. Probably destroying by a mine or air strike or a anti tank crew.
Great video! Love the new editing btw, lot of fun to watch :D
18 seconds in and sorry Spookston but Russia isn’t fielding T-62s against Leopards or even against Ukrainians T-72 variants. They just have such a huge supply of them they’re using them for trench support/artillery in some instances. Ukraine is literally doing the same thing even using Maxim guns from museums and also using T-55s/ T-62s. Plus with APCs being super important in modern battlefield those old soviet tanks can still put pressure on low armor vehicles. I would advise not to follow west propaganda next time and try to stay neutral. As an American who’s against the war and not blindly following Ukrainian’s side.
Bruh there are russian T62s captured which got shot by 125mm from ukrainians
@@KingSpittusFactus Okay? You see the videos Ukrainians and Russians fighting in trenches? The T-62s are pretty vulnerable, but that’s why both sides are using them because they have them and won’t be losing anything if they get destroyed. It’s a win win for both sides to use older equipment
Russia is using the t-55s as artillery. They aren’t supposed to shoot other tanks. Just yeeting HE down range.
Imagine having to use T-55 as Artillery 💀
@@indeed169 i mean....
it must be working...
You really do have the best editing. I love your armour history and explanation videos, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't enjoy these.
2:09 I did not expect you to use a voiceline from horus heresy legions but I'm glad you did
Correction regarding the T-54/55’s being used by Russia: they’re using them not as frontline tanks but as makeshift self-propelled artillery
Which still is embarrasing for russia
@@fuckinantipope5511 how? T55s were always intended to be used as arttilery
@@adrianotaylor7230 uh, no? T-55s were the soviets main battle tanks back in the day. They aren't artillery
@fuckinantipope5511 yeah and if you look at the training manual of the T55 you'd see that the crews were also trained on it to use it as indirect fire 🤦 a tank gun and an artillery gun both can send projectiles at a long distance and furthermore T55s arent even being sent with a commander due to it not needing to be used as a MBT
@@adrianotaylor7230 the guns aren’t necessarily effective as artillery due to their flatter, higher velocity projectiles compared to those of a howitzer
2:40 Wagner in Bakhmut be like:
0:10 ❌❌ Wrong. T-62s and T-64s are mainly used by the LPR and DPR militias. The Russian Armed Forces only use captured T-64s in their ranks, thats why lots of T-64s in Russian service are of the ‘Bulat’ modification. The T-55s are not front line infantry/tank fighting vehicles, they are used as indirect fire SPGs, they are used like this die to the apparent huge surplus of 100mm HE rounds, these ‘Tanks’ now ‘SPGs’ have a crew of 3 instead of 4, this is due to the lack of a need for a commander. Some T-55s have even had their turrets removed and used as armoured recovery vehicles or a 57mm autocannon put in place.
he right tho
i think the russian using T-55 series tank in ukraine is proofven but its not use as a tank but a mobile altelery pieces, so its doesnt need APDSFS but it only need HE
but the APDSFS you see earlier is probably just a defence mecanism
It's none the less utterly pathetic for a supposed "military superpower".
Copium
Like Chieftain Said in a Video from Forgotten weapons the ammo and the Gun (115mm) was never developed to its full potential
Damn dude I think this is your best video to date, it had me on my ass the whole runtime. Keep it up !
russia is not using those old tanks as frontline mbts. They're just using them for fire support basically, oftentimes even for indirect fire like artillery. Basically that or giving the old ass tanks to the militaries (militias?) of the separatist areas.
7:08 the tank evaporated
the experience with the amazing mobility of T-62M-1 has clearly prepared you to play the Chieftain (any variant).
Nice change of pace. Love the video.
The Obj 685 barely gets attention for a light tank with potential.
I really would love for spookston to play it Once just once.
T-62 and T-55 are not used like MBT's but arty or self propeled gun sonthing like the m26 in korean war
Tank v tank combat may not exactly be what we all envision it to be with these comparisons. Especially when aerial superiority comes into play. It’s at least interesting to play into the “what if” of things when it’s Spookston at the keyboard.
I shall never give up with requests for a XM-803 video
I've noticed that the 115mm guns have been doing less dmg from before. Didn't help the T62M1 got a reload nerf a while back.
Russia uses older tanks for indirect fire support, i could be wrong tho every source says something else on this
you'[re correct, they're being used as SPGs but also being donated to LDNR troops who probably will use them as MBTs.
This is exactly how it feels to fight t-80bvms in Leopards and Abrams
I swear whenever I start thinking about a certain tanks and it’s almost tradition that someone makes a video on it
This ancient stone door sound when u described the rotation speed killed me... thanks
Fun fact: given current conditions, a properly deployed BM-31-12 would've been an excellent weapon.
It’s nice to see spookston suffering for our pleasure but let’s take a moment to realize that bm-31-12 at 2:48 killed the freebrams but I’ve been seeing that truck at top tier all the time it’s funny to see and it’s kinda sad I can’t get it but to everyone who does have it I hope you have lots of fun in the future.
I see that "Priority Target" 40k Titan audio clip was in your recommended lists recently as well.
This video was particularly entertaining. My dad really enjoyed the funny dog picture at the very end.
Hey mate could ya do the T-90A I’d like to see the eyes in action
From what i understand the Russian forces are using the t55 as artillery, not as a frontline tank as you put it. It probably is very inaccurate but they have a lot of ammo, why not use them? They have enough of other tanks capable of going up against newer western tanks. They are churning out new T90s way faster than the west can, if im allowed to guess.
A thougth aswell on the use of old rounds. From what ive heard there hasnt been a lot of tank on tank combat and the tanks have mostly been firing heat or he, and the older ammo is still pretty capable against the tanks they have faced so far. Might aswell use it.
T-90s havent been seen on the front for half a year!
I'd love to see the performace difference between having high and low reverse speeds (could use the ztz99 II/III and the 99A/prototype at the same BR to compare)
Hey Spookston, good day to you. I was wondering if you could play the Japanese STB-1. I’m very close to getting it and I want to see what I can expect. Or you could play the ST-A3 because auto loader is always fun.
They don't use them as MBTs, rather as heavily armored mobile artillery, they have plenty of ammo reserves, resistant to artillery barrage shrapnels and no modern electronics that could be easily jammed : )
Regular 155mm shells can be jammed they have no electronics lol.
Cope.
@@Ben-fk9ey this isnt reddit sir, cope has no value here
Would love to see spooky play Ariete. An MBT which at least on paper is something to his taste.
[3:53] Spookston: Please, be dis-track-ted.
Gaijin: Alright!
Hey spookston, would you try the Object 685? You did a video on the 906 and I'd like to see how they compare
3:14 the state of shells right now is kinda sad, it doesn't matter if is HEAT or AP sometimes rounds just dont do any damage after pen.
For how sub par this thing is at its own br (mainly because of uptiers) i like it, it probably one of my top 10 tanks
Nice video! Could you try the flak 88 bus?
How does the little guy inside the turret throw open the hatch, chuck the hot shell casing out, and slam the hatch shut so quickly?
I think it's ejection is automated, it uses the gun's recoil to discard the spent shell.
The reason the SEP's ARAT didn't stop the APFSDS is because it's a western ERA in War Thunder.
if that was russian era it would've ricochet the shell back into the shooter and hit the ammo
It was really good on one of the dev serves then got nerfed to hell
They nerfed NATO ERA so bad, and they don’t even include ARAT 2 which is crescent shaped and not blocky shaped
ARAT never meant to stop Kinetic stop complaining about thing that not real, ARAT compose of a simple explosive charge with thin container
Actual ERA that mean to stop kinetic sit at far steeper angle and thicker plate
@@Aes880 So will super blazer be corrected then?
I just watched a video the other day of Russian T-80 engaging Ukrainian T-64 at like 25m range, it was nuts. Very interesting seeing real life tank combat play out at video game ranges, although I really feel bad for those fellas that experienced a significant emotional event.
Also, your laugh is adorable and makes my day. Thanks for the upload.
there are few videos with tank-tank combat. if i'm right, Russian crews win majority of them but against T-64BV/Es driving T-80s so whatever.
@@raketny_hvost it isn’t the Russian tanks that the main issue, they work as they were intended to. Instead the large amount of modern AT weapons which are deadly for any tank.
@@finkamyash i was speaking about straight tank-tank duels
@@raketny_hvost yeah I accidentally replied to your comment mb
Made it into one of your videos makes me happy even tho I destroyed your breach manytimesthat fulda match at beginning of the video XD
Spookston, are you able to play out the VBC by chance? Quite a fun IFV.
Please make a video about the ST-A3, it's my favourite tank in War Thunder
Jagdpanther? Can you please play that?
Heya spookston i recently started playing war thunder and seeing how israel is my only option to play somewhat high tier without buying premium tanks.
Would you wanna give the M51 a go? I quite like it but im wondering what your opinion is.
I love the editing
T-54’s and T-55’s won’t be used for tank combat but rather for indirect fire aka as a field artillery. Just for clarification
I mean I can agree it's pain but I personally love both the normal and M variant of the t 62 I really never have bad experiences with them.
I just wish the normal t62 had a roof machinegun. I think I will replace it with the 435 since I don't have extra crew slots
Hey, I just started playing France and have been love the amx-13 fl11. Not many people seem to play it though, could you take it out?
Hey spooks, you play the first chiefton mk3?
I just unlocked it and struggling hard with it
Hey Spook, you should play the Semovente 75/46 M43. It's a deeply overshadowed italian tank destroyer which can deliver an heavy punch but it's deeply ignored the potential it has.
(Day 38)
No, they're not using T55 or T62s as MBTs. They're using them in the indirect fire role, essentially turning them into SPGs, as these old tanks still have sights for that purpose. They're also using them as IFVs and other random roles.
So they're still being used in combat, got it, thanks for confirming what we already knew
Its cause they have 100mm ammo but no trucks and shit. However trying to indirect fire in war thunder is, yeah
@@Legion617 did I say they're not or did I just explain not as MBTs but rather in other roles.
@@murmaider2 Yes you did, you said they're using them as IFVs. In most combat operations/doctrines, tanks should be used to support infantry, which is what IFVs also do, so they're essentially in combat operations by the comment you stated.
Hi Spookston, can you give advice which premium is better to purchase? Turms or T-55AM-1?
The AMX 30 1972 is still one of my most played vehicles and I would love to hear your thoughts on it
You should try the type 16fps, from what i heard it's pretty busted and should go up in the br, would love to see your opinion
I feel like people only think it’s a problem bc they can pay for an 8.7 with a subpar dart but with Gen 3 thermals instead of having to grind through Japan to get it, which just added to the premium black hole at that BR. Don’t remember anyone complaining about the Type 16(P) when it was added to the TT.
I hope the poor conscripts thrown into T-54/55s and T-62s really never have to face off against actual armor. Even more so I hope this war ends.
It's not to many tank battles in Ukraine
Yeah, most are dying to air on both ends.
@@DIEGhostfish Those aint used as tanks its mobile artillery. All (most of tanks) are used like that in current state of conflict
I mean there's a legitimate chance Russian conscripts with T-62M-1 and T55AM-1 face off against Ukrainian conscripts in Leo 1s and T-55S, in which case Russians may have an advantage. But for real, tank to tank battles have proven to be very rare in this war.
Don't worry, AFU 47th airborne Bde with it's brand new slovenian M-55S is expected to be in the first echelon of the UA counteroffensive
Bro could get 13 kills and a nuke with the L3 and still call it "alright" and "not bad"
You need to do more of this
its funne how much is being brought up by this whole Ukraine thing yet America did fail 2 times against similar if not less equipped military groups *Vietnam Afghanistan*
Ah yes russia was so successful with the invasion of Afghanistan. And the US job was to train the ANA and stabilize the region..the ANA was trained and the region stabilized and in 20 years usa lost like 1000 people while russia lost that in less than a week.
@@KingSpittusFactus ah yess i suppose vietnam to then what was it 7M troops sent over and u lost to what was almost 1M nva troops
A lot of people tend to forget that only a few dozen old, derelict Leopards and Abrams are being sent
Ukraine's entire tank fleet is barely modernized T-64s and whatever unmaintained T-72s countries like Poland donated. It's not like they're getting 6000 2A7s like a HOI4 MD game 🤷♂
Yea I wouldn't trust info from a guy with a pfp of Putin
Cool
i watched the "priority" target warhammer meme about 20 mins ago did you see that in a warhammer meme and use it or find it somewhere else? would be cool asf if your into the game as well
I would love to see your opinion on the IT-1, or maybe the RaketenJPZ .
The t55s are used for indirect fire cause of availability of ammo but not transport yet i think trying to do that in war thunder would be even worse
Can you do a video about the Leo1 and T55 at top tier facing T-80BVM like in Ukraine
or T55 against t80bvm
Or f16 vs is2 like it's gonna be soon
Or a t-55 facing a leopard 2a6 for example. lol
You should try out the FIAT 6614, it's one of those glass cannons that are super quick.
I saw the BM-31 go over the hill after the Abrams, Saw the kill feed and lost it. That Abrams must have been incredibly upset.
These tanks are being used by Russia for 2 reasons. 1 - The abundance of HE ammo from Soviet reserves. 2 - These tanks will be used as field and mobile artillery pieces for supporting assault operations against cities and trench lines. These tanks are not intended to fight any modern tanks whatsoever. Don't look at it as desperation; look at it as recycling. Instead of letting them rot in warehouses, they will use the guns to support infantry.
Let me correct you on this 0:37 statement
I know Americans usually don't know much about European conflicts, but Russia is not using T-54s/T-55s. They do Use modernized T-62s because it's a far better tradeoff when it's lost to stuff like artillery (artillery accounts for most tank kills in Ukraine, on both sides), Ukraine won't be using anything better than ''donated'' T-55s and T-72s, so a modernized T-62 can still keep up with them while modern T-90Ms and T-80BVMs are saved for future offensives. As of now, Leopards never actually met T-62s because they are not in significant frontline use anymore, as they served their purpose in 2022 and early 2023, Leopards got absolutely wrecked by artillery and Ka-52s/Mi-28s, never even seeing a Russian tank. On the T-54/T-55 issue, they are used either as a training platform for drivers or are used as rear echelon tanks, guarding objects like ammunition depos and oil storage facilities.
Hope this clears things, it's not meant as an attack on you, but this should clear air on the ''muhh Russian army bad, defeated by 50 nations''
the trend of "americans dont know what theyre talking about" continues. Where are these T80's and T90's? Nowhere. the russians have no reason to just keep the best stuff behind the lines, since theyre not winning. Ukraine has also lost like 10 confirmed western tanks with some more T72's and such, compared to the 50-150 tanks russia has lost (50 being the number given by Putler)
Stop thinking that you know something and look at the facts.
@@kekkoinen Yet your facts are entirely wrong and based on Wikipedia or Ukranian propaganda, Russia has more ground now than at the start of the Special Military Operation. Where are the T-80s and T-90s? AT THE FRONT. There are videos of T-90Ms just driving around and decimating Ukranian positions...yet Leopards and Bradleys absolutely failed, all Leopards from Poland and Denmark have been destroyed, confirmed by video sources. 2A6s and 2A5s are all pretty much gone too...Challengers got scrapped on the way to Ukraine since Britain is absolutely terrified on the prospect of Russia capturing a Challenger...
I ain't reading allat.
@@kekkoinen Also i forget to add...i was right. What i wrote here 7 months ago proved to be true, with offensives conducted by T-90Ms and T-80BVMs supported by BMDs and BMP-2s...
Hey spookston! Can you play with leopard 1 or Jpz 4-5, bc i have a rought time with them , in particular with Jpz 4-5.
Hey nice video can u do the t-35 Soviet pls day 1