Mark Solms ~ Active Inference Insights 017 ~ Affect, Consciousness, Dreams

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 27. 03. 2024
  • It’s more consciousness-talk on today’s episode of Active Inference Insights, as Darius discusses affective states, dreams, interoception and much more with psychoanalyst and neuropsychologist Professor Mark Solms.
    Mark Solms
    neuroscience.uct.ac.za/contac...
    scholar.google.com/citations?...
    mark_solms?lang=e...
    "The Hidden Spring: A Journey to the Source of Consciousness"
    "The Brain and the Inner World: An Introduction to the Neuroscience of the Subjective Experience"
    Darius Parvizi-Wayne
    / dparviziwayne
    www.researchgate.net/profile/...
    Active Inference Insititute
    www.activeinference.org
    / inferenceactive
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 18

  • @joanmoloney8188
    @joanmoloney8188 Před 2 měsíci

    think the 'hard problem' might mutate to delayed or absence of feeling in order to prioratise awareness of need .the hard problem of Affect.love Mr Solms.

  • @silviopina_111
    @silviopina_111 Před 2 měsíci +1

    YAY!!! Don't know how I missed this Solms one, but found it now! 🎉

  • @alexandrazachary.musician
    @alexandrazachary.musician Před 3 měsíci +1

    Thanks so much Darius ❤️🙏🏽. I love Mark Solms and I totally love where the dual-aspect monism is going!!! Spinoza would be happy 😁. Finally after so much sloshing about in physicalism… not you… but many. ❤️❤️❤️

  • @bellakrinkle9381
    @bellakrinkle9381 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Apologies, I'm rather focused on Fairbaign's object relations theory lately. I'll return another time.
    It's great to see Dr. Solms doing new interviews. I subscribed.

  • @rockapedra1130
    @rockapedra1130 Před 19 dny

    44:47 i like how the interviewer does not let himself get derailed away from the Hard problem. Solms has a lot of great ideas which i find fascinating but they don't quite penetrate into the Hard Problem imho. If I'm understanding Solms' stance correctly, he appears to treat subjectivity as an axiom? "Subjective feelings exist because they do. Things are dual, don't know why. Now let's talk about about how feelings are used." I don't think Solms is saying he has solved the Hard Problem, right? He just wants to talk about details and consequences AFTER the Miracle of subjectivity.

  • @davedouglass438
    @davedouglass438 Před 3 měsíci +1

    Would it be useful to restore SURPRISE/STARTLE into ongoing discussion of the core affects, as in Silvan Tomkins' work?
    At minimum, this would allow a differentiation between Karll Friston's usage of 'surprise' (or surprisal) from Tomkins" ideas.

  • @TechyBen
    @TechyBen Před 3 měsíci +1

    30:00 is the explanation! The two "Mark Solms" both consider themselves "the same" but have some value difference *and are aware of that difference*. As that difference is some "value" not measured in the system *but between it's states*, it's a "feeling", because it can classify it, detect it, effect it, the thing "exists", but it cannot be observed directly, it's subjective! :D

    • @rockapedra1130
      @rockapedra1130 Před 19 dny

      Can u flesh this out a bit? I'm not sure what u mean by it being "the explanation". Explanation of what? Not the Hard Problem, right?

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen Před 19 dny

      @@rockapedra1130 The self is the system that can detect changes in self. To do so, it's a feeling, because there is no external measurement for it, as an external system is detecting changes of other states, self is detecting changes of it's own state.

    • @rockapedra1130
      @rockapedra1130 Před 19 dny

      @@TechyBenah, ok. So it's more of an explanation of the definition of "feeling". Not an explanation of how a feeling can come to manifest itself subjectively to begin with, right?

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen Před 19 dny

      @@rockapedra1130 Those are words. Things are what we (as existing things) classify.
      If we classify something it is. What the complexity around this is, is "math" a thing that "physics/matter" is not.
      We exist, I'm not worried about the mechanism and if it's made of matter, or made of the arrangement or function of matter.
      Self classification seems to be a thing that exists, and that classification can be listed against other classifications, and we consider that a "feeling" (feeling hungry vs not, happy vs sad etc).

    • @TechyBen
      @TechyBen Před 19 dny

      @@rockapedra1130 (It can come to manifestation via the mechanisms that allow for self classification.
      Sensations of our senses, thinking from our brain, social behaviours, etc. Mechanistically or socially, biologically or mentally)

  • @davedouglass438
    @davedouglass438 Před 3 měsíci

    Solms/Feldman Barrett discussion
    Pt 1: czcams.com/video/9yEPHUKyBOM/video.html
    Pt 2: czcams.com/video/Ni3cIhn4xb4/video.html

  • @betel1345
    @betel1345 Před 3 měsíci +1

    I'd love to see Lisa Feldman Barrett on here!

  • @_ARCATEC_
    @_ARCATEC_ Před měsícem

    Subjective Perspective of a Conscious Organism
    •X(s zPc q(o ) ZC ( O)Q zpc S)Y•
    Extended Homeostatic Driver
    •Xe h(s z q(δ E)Z(e ∆)Q z S)H eY•
    Subjective Conscious Feeling
    •X (s zc Fq() ZC ()Qf zc S) Y•