Artemis 1 Launches, Asteroid Crashes, ESA Gets New Astronauts - Deep Space Update November 23rd
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 11. 2022
- Another selection of news stories from the last couple of weeks, beyond all the rocket launches who can honestly say they were expecting BTS to be beamed from the Moon?
Follow me on Twitter for more updates:
/ djsnm
I have a discord server where I regularly turn up:
/ discord
If you really like what I do you can support me directly through Patreon
/ scottmanley - Věda a technologie
Scott, there are high quality cameras on board, however there isn’t sufficient downlink bandwidth available to send it back to Earth. To save bits, the raw camera feeds are taken for a few seconds, reduced to the minimum number of bits needed to get the basic picture, then a slate is displayed while the system prepares a few seconds of the next camera in the rotation. This signal is the presented to a multiplexer which inserts the feed into the downlink back to Earth. So basically the images have been folded, spindled, and mutilated by the time we get to see. The good news is that the raw video is being stored onboard. After the spaceship has returned, the folks at JSC will ingest, categorize, publish, and archive the videos and still images. Once this is done, the imagery will be made available to the public. So we just have to be patient for the good stuff.
Dr. Leon Cream
This is because we are still using the same S band frequencies from the Apollo era, with 2 Mbit/s at best 🙄
Meanwhile MRO can do 6, JWST 20 and LRO 150 Mbit/s, why? Because even probes that old and that far use Ka band systems! There's no excuse for this...
@@Valery0p5 Yeah right, cause it’s so easy to replace deep space network satellites. Only takes billions upon billions and years to do.
@@Valery0p5 there's no excuses but plenty of reasons.
NASA is basically being used as a cash cow to secure govt funding by the private aerospace industry, it's a racket and congress are complicit because it provides jobs for their constituents and such which helps to maintain their positions.
This project was delayed over and over despite being cobbled together from re-used leftover pieces of the space shuttle program. It's one big con dude.
what's JSC?
SLS was so powerful it blew the elevator doors in. Tidbits like that are why I come to this channel.
But they are only supposed to blow the bloody doors off.
@@carlossaraiva8213 "Launch Objective Failure: Doors Not Bloody Blown Off"
Poor Daryl. When he yelled "Here we go" I knew it was going be a very different launch coverage.
@@ScottManley1 FAKE AND GAY ohwait that's not an insult anymore.. FAKE AND YEETWORTHY
I can smell you through my screen. Go take a shower.
He's not the only one who had grammar errors during a historic launch, Jack King said all engine running during the Apollo 11 launch
Honestly I like the "Booster Inij'jition".
That voice crack really makes you feel that this is something out of the ordinary, that could not have happened, and that we were waiting for so long.
It reminds me of the first launches from NASA, eg Explorer I or also the Saturn I first launch .
Yeah
They were So ready for it as the countdown reached the last 10 seconds that they went YEAH SCREW IT BOOSTER INIJIJNATION!
what followed was way worth it
"WE RISE TOGETHER"
that line
That line is a powerful source of unity
Unity not seen Since the apollo programs
The first successful launch of the Saturn V was That first Unity Blast
Now we wait for Artemis 2 with its next unity blast
So it gives it The power To match the first crewed mission of Saturn V
then
*the first crewed lunar landing in over 50 years with Artemis 3*
That unity event
Will match apollo 11
It will be amazing
I don't think it was a voice crack. I think it was a digital codec issue; there's a weird sound artifact when the voice comes back.
@@oasntet that's just the noise that happens when they change camera views
@@oasntet that wasn't there in the nasa livestream
"that could not have happened". Oh yes, so true. I could think of so many ways to not make it happen.
Dear NASA, please use a stronger kickstand for your moonbike. Thanks. Bye.
they copying spacex BCTX clearly
Needa neon strips and hockey stick spoiler and ground fx and a dope sub. It sits right under the seat where spaceman rids, hes no dummy he digs the bass.
Nasa: hey we knew it was powerful
Just didn't think the tower would not be able to handle it
And besides you wanted it Lanched!
Stop using rtv to glue together rockets at the last second too
My good friend, Les Johnson, was the lead scientist on NEA Scout, the second solar sail mission they sent us. He is greatly disappointed, obviously. The constant fail mode of getting SLS to actually launch (returning to VAB over and over) and no ability to externally recharge did the deed. It's batteries were bricked.
Sorry to hear, I wonder how many of the other cubesats died or suffered malfunctions for similar reasons?
Did he say if they requested charging in the VAB? The Artemis I secondary payload specs say that 18650 Li-ion systems can access ground power on a case-by-case basis in the VAB. idk if that was actually available or not.
Hold on, I need to weep for a second
No ability to charge from zero using sunlight?
@@meepk633 I recall hearing about a charging opportunity during one of the rollbacks. Specifically, I think what I read was that the team behind one of them (either LunaH-Map or Lunar IceCube, I think) decided not to charge then, and to just rely on solar charging after deployment, to avoid the risk of damage by touching it.
I hope Derrol doesn't feel too bad. I think that little fumble adds to the excitement. It really reflects the moment lol. Real shame about the SLS cubesats, hopefully the remaining ones keep working.
Broadcasters losing it a bit during epic historical moments is part of some of the greatest known and loved pieces of footage. It's nothing new but people today are really nitpick and cynical.
Armstrong mucked up his moon landing speech. I think Darryl can feel happy enough with his performance :D
"Tranquility base here, the Eagle has landed." "Roger Twang-Tranquility, we copy, you're on the ground. You gotta buncha guys here about to turn blue -- we're breathin' again, thanks alot." -- Apollo 8, first moon landing. edit: Scratch that--Apollo 11
@@HydrusGemini apollo 8?
@@orionSpacecraft Oops, I'm gonna play that mistake off as making my point...Apollo 11
Not exactly surprised about the cubes' fail/success ratio given all the Artemis delays. Sad about the "rainbow sail" mission, NEA Scout, however. I really wanted to see that one work.
The X-37 is so cool. Not just because it's so secret, but because it's an adorable little remote-controlled space shuttle. It must be such a fun gig to play around with that thing.
Depends what it's doing I guess. If it's exposing materials for later analysis I'd get pretty bored after a couple hundred days. On the other hand if it's running around sticking pictures of the earth in front of spy cameras that would be fun.
@@duckrutt Flying around to Russian spy sats and attaching little LCD screens over the lenses that just 24/7 play Rick Astley's Never Gonna Give You Up video... This would warm my heart beyond description.
@@nuru666 Rick rolling Russian sats. I'm not sure if that's funny.. or just cruel. :)
@@TheEvilmooseofdoom A little of column A, a little of Column B, but I'm ok with it.
Lol Derrol was there with us for every single launch attempt from tanking through T0. That excitement was real! He is an amazing public affairs professional but I'd rather have someone like him with all that real excitement than to get every word perfect.
Agreed. I was actually happy to hear genuine excitement, it's almost like he also couldn't believe the thing was actually going. And that stuff is infectious! It's a great part of why I find SpaceX live events fun to watch for the Nth time; the people presenting are just legitimately hyped about the stuff they're covering, because *they actually worked on it*.
Is it a computer generated voice now being used?
Seriously. He did a great. So he slightly jumbled his words from excitement, so what. I don't know why anyone would make a big deal of it.
almost sounded to me like he hit his mic or something as he was speaking, idk.
A slip of the tongue is norminal in those circumstances.
Between the 3 falcons and SLS, there was a lot of previously recovered and reused hardware disposed of.
RIP B1049, B1051 Lost but not forgotten, B1066 gone too soon.
I can't believe you didn't crack a 'don't blow the bloody doors off' joke for the SLS tower lift damage!
I did!
Love your space updates Scott, thank you!
The size limit on rockets may be how much they destroy the launch pad.
The Sea Dragon: allow me to introduce myself
Then we just build stronger launchpads.
Just like in KSP :-)
Have faith. If nothing else, this is a gradual process. They'll figure out how to ruggedize the launch sites further.
They redirect the rocket exhaust below the landing pad, so it doesnt impact it directly. I'd wager there is a lot of headroom.
I'd assume the important size limit for rockets is more about structural strength of materials. Same as construction, every material has a weight capacity it can support. And the bigger you build, the more of that weigth capacity is taken up by material to keep up structural integrity. Eg the biggest steel-column you can make is so heavy it can only support its own weight, and nothing else.
So the bigger you build, the less weight-efficient. And since the rocket equation is so brutal, you really cant afford much "waste".
Regarding the Artemis control audio flowery exclamation: it wasn't just the main presenter - every team lead on the control audio had pre-written scripts for key moments, for example: when they restarted the countdown, the had of the tower control team (IIRC) said something like "in the name of NASA employees and contractors, and all people in the US and the world, I return control to the Kennedy control center" (or some such).
Someone at NASA PR worked hard for this launch 😅😁
Without wanting to dis the efforts of all involved, I gather that sort of scripting looks better on paper to the PR nerds than the cringyness of the viewers hearing it. Either that or it's just one of those USA things the rest of the world doesn't get.
That was LD.... Of course she had a little saying planned. Why wouldn't she? God you people are dumb.
@@3nigma.3nc Yes, you would expect some prepared scripts. The point being the language involved is a bit over the top.
What's the difference between a script, a written script, and a pre-written script?
@@Anvilshock a Script is just a Script.
Written means it's on paper, unlike, you know, "I had a nice idea for a script"
Pre-written means you wrote everything you should say, in case of success, failure and/or delay and there's no free commentary.
But you technically have to write the script before you use it
About Fireballs: You mentioned the America Meteor Society page for reporting sightings in a previous video. In the evening of November 8 I saw a bright fireball over my house in Central Europe while installing my telescope. So I reported it and meanwhile there are almost 80 observations reported. The sites of the seeings are well spread above and below the alps so I suspect there were two things happening at about the same time, maybe two pieces? In Italy someone actually had a camera taking pictures and could capture it! Not as beautiful as the picture you showed, but anyway ... Thanks again for the always appreciated updates and videos! Cheers from Switzerland
I think the "ignition" oddity at 4:26 was a transmission glitch, not what Daryl actually said. I noticed it when it was live - I thought it was a glitch then, and I still think so. You can hear a bit of digital noise right after the apparent repeated syllable, which could have been the audio stream correcting itself after an inadvertent repeat caused it to be a bit behind. I've heard stranger things during streaming.
I thought from the beginning he said “Boosters and Ignition” but I may be wrong
@@Juanito0011 Yeah, it does kinda sound like that! But I suspect it probably wasn't, because boosters and ignition are not separate steps, so "and" would not have been in his script.
That little electronic glitch sound was not in the live broadcast. I only heard it for the first time here in this video. You can hear his lips fumble, I would bet that it was indeed a mistake, not a sound glitch. There's no "J" sound in ignition and you can clearly hear him say it like that.
His tribute to Neal Armstrong, perhaps...
I kept hearing boosters in ignition
I'm just thrilled that we're finally at the point where having so many launches in a month from so many participants has become relatively routine. Am I right to say it's the first time since the 70s heyday of Skylab and the multiple Salyut stations that we have competing space stations? I was impressed with the quality of the images of the moon from Artemis.
I'm from Hamilton Ontario under where the asteroid came down. At about 330 am that night I was lying in bed and heard a loud boom which shook our house for a second or two.
I thought it was thunder but given that its winter weather here that would be unusual. The next day I read a meteorite came down near here. Must have been the sonic boom.
Feels great to finally get another Belgian astronaut at the same time there’s a crew-capable capsule around the moon again :) spaceflight is back, baby!
The level of activity week to week has just been breathtaking! Thank you Scott for being on top of it👍 The asteroid story was very cool, BTW. Happy Thanksgiving 🦃
I believe Scott if from…Not from America lol.
Hitting a bumblebee at 80 mph on my motorcycle, triggered a fascination with the hypervelocity debris whizzing around up there. The impact of even a flake of paint can pack quite a punch.
Thanks for including the Balloon stuff! Balloons should be use for for space access. Thanks for all you do, Mr. Manley!
Oh my that rocket spinning makes me rethink strapping myself outside Artemis 3.
There is a reason NASA stucks with HERO4, because successor models all suck: they freeze, shuts down spontaneously, don't boot. Obviously in space you can't remove the battery and put it back again...
If it works, don’t try to upgrade it. The Hubble still uses a 486 CPU. It originally had a 386 at launch.
This was a great update. Thanks Scott!
Hey Scott !! Great update, per usual (especially the asteroid alert). Thank you -
Question - any update on SpinLaunch? I am curious whether they will require roll stabilization when the projectile is released - essentially the "first stage".
Happy Thanksgiving Scott!!
Scott, there's also a polish reservist there with the batch of new ESA astronauts, for the first time ever to have a chance to represent Pierogi (not counting the USSR age). Polan seems to can into space!!!
Why is the USSR time not counted?
Great update video Scott.
Thanks for all of your hard work. Your videos are always informative and fun. Happy Thanksgiving!
I love these deeps space updates!
I live close to Chicago, just got off work and was getting the mail and saw that asteroid pass, I thought I was loosing my mind, so glad to know I saw what I thought I saw
The thing with ITAR is each organization is responsible for ensuring they are in compliance, so if there is ever any doubt they'll err on the side of caution. In this case, I can see where some of the quick disconnects and ground service equipment would have relevance to missile development, so I can see the argument that was being made. But then again, maybe letting North Korea copy the hydrogen quick disconnect design might be a good idea if it sets them back awhile dealing with leaks 😆
The ITAR excuse is 100% an attempt to censor any photography of damage to the MLP from SLS's launch of Artemis I. There are photos from 2018 showing the exact same umbilicals and other hardware. They weren't so concerned under Jim Bridenstine but they are oh so concerned now under Bill "Ballast" "Father of SLS" Nelson. No bad press permitted.
Your videos are such a bright spot for me. Thanks for making them Scott. 🙂 💜
Thanks for the update Scott and Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family.
The scots and canadians dont celebrate thanksgivings. That holiday only exists in the USA.
>AF Scales the X37 up to it's actual size ( current one is a miniature )
>It's a reusable spaceplane
>With payload capability
>Wait I've seen this one
>Here we go again they didn't learn the first time.
16:56 Space Perspective may not be proper space, but they are still an interesting take on sub-orbital that I hadn't heard about before, and now I would like to know more.
The ability to have that dark sky space experience without the need to have multi g acceleration on liftoff is an exciting development. I can imagine (if I was a multimillionaire) being able to take my wheelchair bound grandma up there, to be able to take my mom who has breathing troubles. It makes space relatively safe for people who are struggling with health issues.
As for learning more, it is a 1g up and down flight, the balloon stays inflated the whole time, no rockets, no parachutes (except for emergency).
Glad to see the balloon is Hydrogen and not Helium.
Thanks for the news, Scott! 😊
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Scott, I'm glad you included Space Perspective in the video! It may not reach space, but it's still pretty damn cool.
I'm rather sad that 1051 was expended. Would have liked to see that particular booster go to the rocket garden due to its significance.
1051 is one of the few boosters that I actually know the name of
thats strange Scott, I always thought Canada was in North America, and was in fact a major part of it! Just teasing you, I love your videos, Thanks !!!
Pointy end up, flamey end down - I'm glad that all launches went well. 😎🤟
SLS finally launching on my birthday was quite nice.
Regarding the asteroid: I wonder what the chances are that there were other bits that preceded it and were not tracked?
I was about 250km NE of the area in a very dark rural area. Just after 10pm Eastern, all of my lights were off and it was pitch black and I saw a bright flash light up the sky and my room.
11:37 Delay Tolerant Networks❤ I did my MSc on DTNs way back in 2007. Good that the Koreans had more sense with their musical choices, I would have rickrolled the whole Earth. From beyond the Moon!
These updates are great - keep them coming
TY for another update .
I heard that last week NASA launched something big, loud, and orange into space. But then I was disappointed to learn it was just a rocket.
LOL
TDS
@@redcat9436 you should stop suffering from it.
I hear we have a few of those here in Florida
Orange man created Space Force. What'd you create?
Make a SOS call from anywhere in North America or Canada.
Happy Thanksgiving Scott
My birthday was on the 23rd, and i got a complementary video from scott munley himself!
what a glorious day
Man, I don't regret staying up all night to watch the Artemis 1 Launch, however, my neighbors might say otherwise
(I might've yelled a tad bit much)
Thanks Scott for the video. How was your space trip. That was awesome seeing you weightless and bobbing around in the plane. Hope your well. Cheers.
Sorry I messaged this in the wrong video. It was from a few months ago when you went zero gravity. Sorry about the confusion everyone. Haha. How many people rewatched it to see if they could see Scott in the rockets. Haha.
What?
@@gsmontag What?
@@NoSTs123what?
He went into the gravity free jet? This was a couple months ago. I messaged on the wrong video. Haha sorry. Anyways. Hello
7:48 - Regardless of camera quality, this is one heck of a great shot of the far side!
Thanks for the update.
Of course the astronaut minus his leg is ..well….one leg lighter so is a super efficient person to have aboard.
A statement and a question:
I have been functionally blind since birth, and I am among a crowd of people like me who would LOVE to go to space. I can't help but wonder what our absence of sight would allow us to perceive, document, and study.
The question:
How extensive was the illumination produced by SLS as it launched? That is to say, what was the area of effect where increased lighting was visible to the naked eye?
That is a difficult question to answer, how far was the illumination from SLS visible? The human eye can see a candle from about 1.6 miles away in an otherwise dark environment. With that in mind, the rocket flame itself would probably be visible from wherever on earth you could physically get line of sight to the rocket. Regular Falcon 9 rockets are visible going up from Orlando, about 60 miles away, and as Scott said, the solid fuel is much brighter per unit thrust than even the kerosene flame of the Falcon 9.
But another question is what part of the sky the rocket illuminates. The sun makes the sky blue, and a rocket makes the sky brighten up yellow even away from the exact direction of the fire, but how far does that extend? That question I have no concept of how to calculate or conceptualize. It is probably largely dependent on the clouds, moisture in the air, particulate air pollution, etc. Those things allow light to be reflected and refracted, such that they don't travel in the straight line from the rocket or sun to your eyeballs.
as the other comment kinda said, if you had a straight path of sight to it you could see it, I've seen several lights from different things being able to illuminate pure darkness like if it was day, even tho the sun is very luminous at its distance the intensity that reaches us is kinda high but totally replicable with artificial lights, so yeah very bright stuff is common and this huge rocket was expectedly bright
Probably not much
@melon husk Nice. Yeah. Almost missed all that. I use NVDA and Voiceover myself. Have you tried Windows 11's Narrator? They're actually starting to make something decent. Either way, this is my favorite space channel.
@melon husk I started using JFW back when Eloquence first came with it: 3.2 or whatever. Got too pricy for my blood, to be honest. I still prefer Eloquence, so I use that where possible. Anyway, I love all the NASA videos, but Scott's commentary is exemplary.
Thanks Scott. Brilliant as always.
Thank you, Scott!
I had an interview with Space Perspective. Their capsule is way smaller than the renderings make you think it is. Also their baloon seal sealer was a hodge podge design with a rat nest of wiring. I am all for new designs to view the earth but I am just not sure about this one. Also they want to be hauling butt when they release their balloon.
The interviewer had a big balloon growing in his nose too
About the Vikram-S rocket from India, it infact did reach the desired altitude and it was a success as far as I know. They aimed for 80km altitude and achieved about 89km... So the mission was a success....
and there was no damage that is being rumored that was the heat shield paint that came off.....
Thanks again., Scott, you do give the best news update. Though is there really so little information that we cannot say what the Artemis capsule is doing?
Great month for space
You got the first comment
@@10_points finally
Hey, Neil Armstrong messed up his lines, it’s fine to mispronounce a word.
The balloon ride sounds awesome.
The Chinese upper stage detonation could have been a deniable ASAT test. The PLAN has been pushing hard in recent years to close the missile gap with the west, especially in ASAT and ABM tech, and there's been a fair bit of buzz around the OSINT community that they're getting close to a viable ASAT platform. Not inconceivable to think they could've installed a missile test rig on a satellite, or even Tiangong, and used that spent upper stage as a target.
Can we have some more undeclared acronyms please? I'm not quite confused enough.
@@BlueZirnitra i got them all except OSINT. ASAT: Anti-Satellite PLAN : Peoples Liberation Army Navy ABM: Anti-Ballistic Missle
I think the more obvious answer is much more likely: technical malfunction. It's still a fairly new launch vehicle (even the CZ-8 it's based on has only flown like 3-4 times so far), and breakup after a few hours could be due to all sorts of reasons from stuck vent valves to an engine failure during an attempted reentry burn. For what it's worth, I'm pretty sure the previous confirmed ASAT tests all produced far more smaller debris pieces, and also there has been no report of any object colliding with the stage after it deployed the satellite (and you better believe the US Space Force would tell us if they had any indication of a potential weapons test).
@@stevevernon1978 OSINT: Open Source Intelligence.
Its actually extremely inconceivable to believe any of those things. If China did an asat test either from the ground or in space we would have noticed
Happy turkey day
Grwat video thanks.... Too cool about the asteroid Earth impact photographs and awesome plot lines map.
... Fly safe !
Scott I love your content.You're not just repeating a news cast with the same info as others. Question: Are there more rocket launches around the world than ever before, or have there been rocket launches all along that just didn't get attention? We used to just hear about the U.S. and Russia and didn't even know these other countries had space programs.
First augmented human in space! 👍
:)
Artemis sure was a bright candle to light...
Inspiration4 had the first. Hagley Arceneau has an artificial leg bone after cancer treatment.
11 November, well, Scott, that was the date of my 50th birthday. Anyway Scott it's a pity that NASA didn't launch Artemis 1 till a minute or so before dawn because then we'd get a night-time liftoff followed by an ascent into the new dawn with plenty of light for the SRBs separating.
Sadly launch window didnt allow it and given rocket was meeting deadlines, they didnt want to risk waiting to november 25th
The 23rd was my birthday and I just want to thank you for informing all of us about everything space! ❤
10:09 “Hailing frequencies” lol
Wait, you're a brit? I thought you are a Scott!
A Scot is a Brit, as are Welsh & English, these plus Northern Irish make up the UK
@@chrissouthgate4554 Uh.. no.. Brits are from Brittain, Scotts are from Scottland, Welsh are from Wales and traitors are from Northern Ireland. :P (My family is from proper Ireland.. well, part.. but then I'm also Scott, Welsh and Brit too among other things but that's besides the point.) If you tell a Scott or an Irishman or even a Welsh that he's a brit... thems fighting words. Living in the UK doesn't make everyone there a Brit.
Hey Scott, go check the acceleration of SLS off the pad frame by frame, I clocked it at 3-5G in the first half seconds of the flight. I think something went really wrong with SLS’s boosters in the first few seconds of flight. It cleared the tower in 6.33 seconds and based on its official TWR it should have taken 7.1 it accelerated far too fast and was faster than even Falcon Heavy. It had an average TWR of over 1.5 in those first few seconds, peaking at a TWR over 4-5 right after lift off. Its acceleration curve is inverted from what you would expect of a rocket taking off. I strongly suspect that SLS nearly exploded on launch and I have no clue how it survived.
Holy shoot what?
Isn't that a bit much for us humans considering they are going to launch humans on the next one?
If true that's interesting because the SRBs were just 3 weeks away from "expiration". I wonder if this excess thrust also explains the increased pad damage.
@@LSF17 basically you heard of all the old stories about “old military weapons” getting unstable with age? Well that doesn’t just apply to bombs. The SRBs use ammonium perchlorate as an oxidizer and is water soluble. It can leach in humid and wet conditions, like say florida. This can potentially result in a thin layer in the fuel of the SRB that’s super oxidizer rich right as it ignites.
Watching the launch frame by frame from multiple angles the first SRB lighting nearly launched SLS on its own lifting it over a foot, it shouldn’t be able to do that, SLS’s SRBs have a rated thrust at sea level of 1490 tons and the 4 RS-25s even at max power produce around 758 tons to be generous. That’s “only” 2550 ish tons of thrust, SLS is 2660 tons at take off. And you can actually see it lift a foot, settle 6 inches and then the second booster lights and it flies off the pad like its a bat out of hell with the devil on its ass.
Maybe they adjusted the throttles on the 4 hydrolox engines a bit too high. Or maybe the boosters had a higher than planned initial thrust. No idea why you consider either a near explosion.
Astronauts with Jet fighter training should be able to handle that momentary G load before returning to the scheduled flight profile.
The new concrete is called fondag and it has only been used on sub pad b. They have bags by the olp but they have not been used yet. Hopefully we see those bags get used up this week
19:30 …So cool that I (and many other people I’d imagine) would love seeing it in a dedicated video! (If you have the time that is)
Could have all sorts of B-roll / slides from the stuff people took, maybe even interview some of the people who were there at the impact site etc, granted just ideas, and you probably have plenty on your plate either way!
(Edit: Clarification)
So disappointed with NASA's absent of coverage with James Webb and now Artemis. With such powerful cameras nowadays. Then they wonder why the mainstream seems to not aware of the importance of this mission, and the decrease of funding.
Once the starship falls on the moon to the side I will laugh so hard.
@@sillystuff6247 I would say silly me, but silly silly YOU!
yeah because the lunar winds will push it over 🙄
Bruh💀🤣
Amazing video @7:10 Reminds me of WALL-E blasting off from Earth - taking the ride, clinging to the outside of the AXIOM scout ship!
The elevator Blast Door also blasted off!
Bla
Prove you're the real Scott
Hi Scott , Happy Thanksgiving. I liked your little night flight , anyways do you any news in regards to S.E.S , it's rather a new company but looks like they are tackling some major hurdles head on . So my question to is . Do you see the potential for Spaceplanes and going from the runway with destinations to LEO and the Moon ?
Happy Thanksgiving to you and your family.
The Indian privately funded rocket launch was a success. The rocket went well above the intended height, (reached 89Kms, was meant to be a sub-orbital), there was no damage. There was no gimble in the engines, and hence had to be rotated for stability.
Amputation to Paralympian to Astronaut is a hell of a thing in 3 years. Good on him!
that was a really really good update.
There is video on youtube of the SLS launch abort tower flying away, taken through the capsule window. There is also a shot of the lift doors blown in.
I was wondering if anyone else noticed the flubbed line during the SLS liftoff. Hey, at least he wasn't the first human standing on the moon when he flubbed his line.
The space perspective flight seems interesting, and much more affordable.
I'm literally amazed when you said they were gopro shots. I think they will be willing to sponsor some future space missions. Haha..
What a time to be alive!
Were there any camera's pointed at the base of Artemis when it launched that were exposed for the exhaust? (Like how we have good imagery of the Saturn V rocket motors on takeoff)
…everything I need to find out…for my Aerospace Classes!
Btw omoteashi is still in the Earth Moon system for some weeks, Jaxa said they will try again to establish communications
Good job. You got a Honeywell turbine engine commercial. WOW
No, you did.
When did we start celebrating midroll ads as a privelege.
Shame about the cube sat failures. I hope they have got some important info from such a valuable opportunity.
9:40 - "that's not a leash - that's a tether"
5:02. They blew the bloody doors off!