Thanks for watching! I know we made a couple of mistake on the gameplay (pesky pesky new commanders!) Don't think it affected the outcome of the game let me know if you disagree!
Cedh is sometimes so silly, like no one attacks, people are all playing the same combos and cards despite having a different commander. Actually commanders don't really matter as it's usually a win with Thassa's oracle.
the real problem is no exist cedh and edh, only exist edh there no be separate formats, mtg will separate these formats one day banning the oppresive combos in edh to make more fun decks and more synergy decks, no only breach, oracle, boring combos and ultra expensive decks.
this is what i don't get about cedh. if you're running all the same cedh cards, combos, and wincons as always, what does it matter that you're using Bloomburrow commanders?
We might not have done a good job showing this on the video but all this commanders have some cool effects that might make them cedh viable; Glarb’s surveil ability makes him a really good reanimator commander, Zinnia provides a bunch of value with making two of each creature you cast (double dockside yes pls); Baylen can actually play a bunch of Stax and win through dockside /Emiel loops, and flubs is a creature storm deck. You’re right that like most cedh decks it’ll win through the same means, but I think they can provide a different avenue to get there
Because some commanders have different tech on how to get there, or make some other cards that are not normally used viable for example Baylen makes use out of tokens which allows you to run certain cards that dont ever see play. While you are correct that in each color identity you can generally expect to have certain win lines, its more about the journey and less about the destination.
We like to keep it basic (all the puns intended ;) ). Sony Vegas Pro 22 but I would recommend literally any other editing software since Vegas likes to crash // can be difficult to work with. Lots of folks use Adobe Premier Pro. Happy to answer any other questions or tips!
Its just a clean win line. If someone is going to win, id rather it be a Thassa/Demonic over watching someone take a long turn and fumble through a Breach line.
Thanks for watching! I know we made a couple of mistake on the gameplay (pesky pesky new commanders!) Don't think it affected the outcome of the game let me know if you disagree!
Cedh is sometimes so silly, like no one attacks, people are all playing the same combos and cards despite having a different commander. Actually commanders don't really matter as it's usually a win with Thassa's oracle.
You just summed up exactly why i have zero interest whatsoever in cEDH lol.
the real problem is no exist cedh and edh, only exist edh there no be separate formats, mtg will separate these formats one day banning the oppresive combos in edh to make more fun decks and more synergy decks, no only breach, oracle, boring combos and ultra expensive decks.
@@ikehirasawa2764 maybe, but it wouldn't be cEDH anymore
Clean production! No fluff. Nice.
Appreciate it!!!
Bloomburrow! So many bunnies!
🐰🐇
this is what i don't get about cedh. if you're running all the same cedh cards, combos, and wincons as always, what does it matter that you're using Bloomburrow commanders?
It doesn't.
We might not have done a good job showing this on the video but all this commanders have some cool effects that might make them cedh viable; Glarb’s surveil ability makes him a really good reanimator commander, Zinnia provides a bunch of value with making two of each creature you cast (double dockside yes pls); Baylen can actually play a bunch of Stax and win through dockside /Emiel loops, and flubs is a creature storm deck. You’re right that like most cedh decks it’ll win through the same means, but I think they can provide a different avenue to get there
Because some commanders have different tech on how to get there, or make some other cards that are not normally used viable for example Baylen makes use out of tokens which allows you to run certain cards that dont ever see play. While you are correct that in each color identity you can generally expect to have certain win lines, its more about the journey and less about the destination.
WOAF (W On A Friday)
👈😎👈
great game! more please
@@ToastyWaffle7710 Every Friday at 830am MST! Thanks for watching !
Good old dockside!
Good old faithful! Can’t go wrong with it! Except on this one…
What is y'alls primary editing software that you use? Love the simplicity of what y'all got going!!
We like to keep it basic (all the puns intended ;) ). Sony Vegas Pro 22 but I would recommend literally any other editing software since Vegas likes to crash // can be difficult to work with. Lots of folks use Adobe Premier Pro. Happy to answer any other questions or tips!
@@MTG_Basics Im quite familiar with Adobe Premiere Pro/DaVinci Resolve and LumaFusion. Very nice! Thank you guys! Loved the video
Did'nt you have 2 dockside tokens so you could have draw one more card with baylen?
Oh good catch! Those extra draws might had drawn the win
🐸
cool game to watch, but man am I so worn out of seeing Thassa's Oracle to win games. It's so overplayed nowadays. No hate !
Yea that’s just the current meta :/. cEDH and Thoracle is like Yin and Yang, can’t have one without the other, for now!
So make a deck with better, faster, more consistent wins. Oh wait, you can't.
Its just a clean win line. If someone is going to win, id rather it be a Thassa/Demonic over watching someone take a long turn and fumble through a Breach line.