GR vs KIAP | House Of SARH Competition 2021 (Action Links Available) | DCS
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2021
- 18:19 ROUND 1 ACTUAL FIGHTING
1:03:00 ROUND 2 ACTUAL FIGHTING
1:36:08 ROUND 3 ACTUAL FIGHTING
Prez's Channel: / @prezdcs
SPONSORS
Winwing: www.wwsimstore.com/STORE
Winwing USA: fox2.wwsimstore.com/STORE
Sponsor Reviews: • Sponsor Reviews
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS(CZcams): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2(CZcams): / @grimreapers2
GRIM REAPERS(Odysee): odysee.com/$/invite/@grimreap...
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDE: • DCS World Module Quick...
DCS OFFICIAL SITE: www.digitalcombatsimulator.co...
ONE TO ONE LESSONS: grimreapers.net/one-to-one-le...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
STREAMS(Other Members): grimreapers.net/gr-twitch/
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD(DCS & IL-2): / discord (16+ age limit)
DISCORD(TFA Arma): discordapp.com/invite/MSYJxbM (16+ age limit)
OTHER
CAP'S X-56 HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/open?id=1g7o...
CAP'S WINWING HOTAS MAPS: drive.google.com/drive/folder...
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#GRCompetitive #DCSCompetitive #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military - Hry
Cap, this was well done. It was like a ball game. You and the other guy calling out what was happening play by play and small talk about the weapons/planes. Really cool. You guys should do it more often. Good training for both squadrons.
thx
Loved this format, grabbed popcorn and cracked open a cold one,
Bravo!!!! The commentary of two like sports reporters was very good, you shoud keep this!
Extremely entertaining. Hats off to KIAP on their fighting and beautiful formation flying.
Ace is actually Tuxxor, but he's having fun in this competition so it has to be kept secret from Cap
This "fun" will not be tolerated!
"ACE": Some say, he farts into his intakes for higher AB-thrust, and he carries an extra AIM 9 in his pants.
lol
Some say about Ace that he is a she; namely Kortana.
She's sorta become a bit of a legend, you know, not too many women flying DCS and here's Kortana & she's really good. So maybe she took the Ace callsign to remain less notorious?
Oh man! That commentary! Never felt any need to fast forward to the battles cause your discussion was so entertaining all the way. Great job and great competition!
Wow Cap! The play by play was outstanding! Hats off to Prez and yourself for a very entertaining match. Exciting to say the least. Hope to see more in the future.
Thank you valued content creator for this. Was tons of fun to watch. Looking forward to hopefully seeing more competitive matches from your boys in the future.
:)
Beautiful video Cap! Everyone showcased great sportsmanship but also incredible skill & flying. Extremely exciting to watch!
Very much enjoyed the video and the commentary by the two .. well done boiz!
This was too short, left me wanting more! Loved it!!
I am late to the party, buy goddamn this was beautiful! Great work guys! Also amazing commentary!
Great commentary by both Cap and Prez!
Yes this was a very well done video! I also liked how there were two teams and two broadcasters! Was basically just like any normal sports games on Television. Soccer, Football, Baseball, Basketball, etc. really liked it and hope to see something like this again!!!
Well done and great color commentary!
Yessss! Some great commentary and insights. Better zooming on the map would help smartphone watchers. Either way I’m up for more of this.
So: Ace = The Stig?
Some say he sucks the moisture from ducks
Hi cap Iv been watching the GR for a cpl of month I'm from lakenheath village I just want to say the GR have help me alot you all have mad me laugh and have enjoyed all your content keep up the great work enjoy your comentry on the vids thank you
Thanks Sir! you are local to me :)
@@grimreapers I did see your vid of your visit to lakenheath viewing site. also dcs looks great bit to complicated for me but watching the grim reapers has help me get thru some tough times if I ever get a pc I think I will try dcs
The formation flying, the unexpected strategies, the great commentary...this was a great sporting event to watch.
Well played and fascinating fight.
Good commentating Cap
Great Competition On Both Sides. Really Enjoyed Guys. Cheers
Superb commentary. Loved it.
Sorry to hear that you felt unwell. I hope you feel better soon!
thx
Thank you for daily videos
Wow this video is amazing!
Some say, Ace is an ex-special forces glass-eating champion!
lols
Exciting!
Dammit I wasn't going to fire up DCS until tomorrow, Off to 4YA I go after I've watched a bit more.
lol
Really did enjoy this one. I know it sounds like a lot of editing work, but for the next one of these do you think it's possible to splice some tac-view footage of the "highlights" or "key moments" if/when they arise. I feel like that would be the only thing to make this even more awesome than it was.
Sadly these fights are done on Saturdays which are officially my days off, so realistically the wife will never allow me to edit these properly, but good idea.
Ace is the Stig... in disguise :-) !
I have two real world observations that actually tie in with this video. This first is Cap's comment on how there is a function where you can randomize wear and tear on an airframe to give DCS more realism. This also applies to radars. Before I go into this I have to explain I was an avionics guy but not a radar guy. The radar guys were also avionics so we always got lumped together and hung out during work hours. This is my understanding of things based on conversations with them including asking about the system while standing next to the aircraft with the access door opened and looking at it. Back in the day there were several computers that made up the aircraft radar package and part of how they would communicate with each other was waveguides. The raw signal was sent between computers this way and they were somewhat fragile. Think flexible oval tube made of something slightly more thick than aluminum foil. All of this to say radar performance varied from jet to jet and how well the computers in the package "talked" to each other. To illustrate this I remember being temporary duty for two weeks (Vegas I think) and the radar guy were having a horrible time, to the point that they were not sure they would have enough part to support the mission for the second week. The decision was made to put all the "bad" parts in one jet and send it back to our base in New Mexico while they sent an placement jet in return. When the jet with "bad" parts arrived the pilot threatened to do vile things to anyone who touched that radar because it was working great, and signed any discrepancies as FMC. All this to say there is an annoyingly subjective component to radar where the performance can vary jet to jet. This leads me to my second story.
We had a flight either 4 or 6 fighters that was going up against another flight of 4 or 6 that was from another base but they were meeting over the range for air combat practice much in the same way GR and KIAP were meeting in this video. Whelp, one of our jets had a radar that was working exceptionally well and he detected the enemy force at nearly 100 miles out. They quickly worked out a plan where they guy with the good radar would hang back and give directions to his buddies who went in with radar off and used heaters to bring down the baddies and it worked pretty well. While watching this I kept thinking GR needed the guy with the exceptional radar. Could DCS add the radar variable? Would it make a difference in an environment without AWACS?
terrible idea to randomize radar range as now you win by getting RNGesused the god eye. meanwhile if your opponent gets it but you dont suddenly you got cheated by RNGesus and theres nothing you could have done to even know the other guy has more range
Ace is Wags.
agree
I'm hanging in there by the threads boys. Hope you are well Reapers. Good morning from the controversial United States Of America
Hi Will :)
Really enjoyed this thanks to all. I would lurvvvv to see the fight from someones POV in the plane. Does anyone record their flight? Any links? Thanks again well done to all.
I would love to see some tank mission please
Maybe the Reapers need to start practicing together a little more often. Maybe come up with tactics too?
I bet ace is growling sidewinder
I admit that would be pretty cool!
GS didn’t make the cut.
I will confirm that it is not GS.
@@signore1 and I will confirm that it might be...
Hey @@signore1 2 years later are we aloud to know who ACE was?!
Really enjoying the competition watch alongs! Definitely a cool esport.
Side question: how many AIM9s can the A-10 carry? Wonder if between that and the GAU it would be as/more effective in the F16 role in this competition?
Just no, an A10 is a sitting duck, no radar to build a picture and you just take the fight vertical to out maneuver it.
@@MultiVeeta fair enough, I haven’t played DCS so wouldn’t know. But if the point of the F-16s is not to use radar and sneak up for a close in kill in this specific tournament, seems like those wouldn’t really be problems…
Plus from my understanding it had good endurance so like the flankers, could basically fly around the bubble to sneak up from behind and your SA would come from Comms with team mates. Didn’t seem like there were many people having enough time to get into a prolonged rate fight that would give them the edge by going vertical, and the dissimilar air frames might give you an advantage if the other team wasn’t expecting it and isn’t used to fighting A-10s close in.
Like I said I’m no expert by any means and could very well be way off, just seems like it could be an interesting option for this specific set of rules.
@@mikejulien2330 lack of speed to keep up with the fight being a big issue for a start, no support or pressure from radar locks and launches being applied basically makes the opponent have an advantage in numbers and pressure. Fight would be over before A10 reached it, then to skirt the bubble is adding even more time to a weighted fight. This would leave the A10 on its own against the remaining, the thought that an A10 could compete against competent players is a non starter. It may be able to defeat missiles by notching and flares but attacks from different aircraft at different angles would end his day and make him realise he should have taken the far more capable Viper.
ummm, what was with the repeating fight??? R3 was just a repeat of R2...
Nice engagement and video, well done! I was surprised by your guest claim that the Mirage FM is off though, they modeled it with telemetry and full access to the French Ada, real pilots validated it and from Mirage III to Rafales, they ve always built outstanding dogfighters. Didnt see anything on the ED forum as well regarding the M2k FM. Whereas Su27s and 33s actually have a fantasy Flight Model in DCS due to classified restrictions and the F16 in ED own words is still a work in progress for the FM.
What are you on about there are plenty of charts and documents on Flankers. The DCS Flanker flight model is more advanced than the DCS Mirage.
@@MultiVeeta Well if that was the case we would have a high fidelity module of the Su27, besides there are plenty of charts of documents about the Mirage too, the difference is the devs had access to telemetric datas which makes it a lot more accurate than basing a FM on books about an aircraft that is classified by the Russian Gov.
If you want hard facts about the Mirage, look at what the Greek pilots who trained vs F16s or Indian pilots who have Russian planes and Mirages, or you can check what the Egyptians pilots said about its exceptional manoeuvrability too, they also fly different aircrafts besides the Mirage so they can compare first hand.
If you see any flaw in the Mirage FM, why not report it with hard facts on the ED / Razbam forum, there are no complaints about the FM, AFAIK on that forum, what do you base your criticism of its FM on? You flew the Mirage? Because the people who helped Razbam actually did for a living. Where the Mirage has issues is the Damage model and the radar but an important update that will address it is expected before the end of the year.
@@SFDPSFDP get off your soap box. I never said anything bad about the Mirage just that the Su27 FM is superior.
The reason it is not full fidelity is because of classified avionics of later variants and the Russian governments threats of using any available source such as the freely available aircraft manuals of older variants, such as in DCS, to replicate these avionics, nothing to do with FM being secret. The Mirage has EFM the Su27 uses PFM which has much tighter expectations and broader detail than what EFM expectations are.
ED could not of made PFM without having actual fly out charts, fuel and hydraulic weights/motions etc. and fluid system blueprints etc. This is all freely available
@@MultiVeeta Come on the guy in the video claims it is an UFO which is an extreme exaggeration, he has absolutely no idea of what a Mirage can and cannot do , never flown it, is not a professional pilot, has not worked on the project and has basically no clue nor any technical argument to back it up.
As for the Su-27 it is not just the electronics and sub systems that are classified AFAIK, but you seem to have a deep insider knowledge of what info ED had or else you are speculating to defend your statement but in any case it is certain to me that they do not have all the datas to model it, at least less data than Razbam had to model the Mirage and besides airplanes necessarily will be fantasy in a DCS sim with limited parameters when such performance planes are flown beyond or near their envelope limits. However i trust the ones modeled with telemetry and cooperation with the airforce and trustable and competent sources, professional pilots a lot more than a random virtual gamer bashing the plane for subjective reasons.
Cap: "I am not much of a streamer"
So Cap, what do you call the streams where you clearly have your paid / Patreon guys in the live chat when making the videos? :D
I would call that a stream, and you have done it enough to be labelled a streamer :D
OK fine, I mean that I am a shit streamer.
it used to be about that man not the machine!
ACTUAL FIGHTING :-)
Please make jordan vs israil
I have the feeling that Ace is CW lemoine
While I have to admit it does fit his MO / limits for DCS as he doesn't want to touch BVR.
I still have my doubts on that one though.
I didn't think of that.
That's tech-knee-she-um
Russian knights has changed their aircraft from su-27 to su30sm and now testing su-35s
Russian Aerospace Forces
Cap you should seriously consider being a sports commenter as a career
lols
He is now… esports.
F35 vs harrier?
Boom boom Cap.
Is there a M1150 tank in the game yet
I don't recognise the name.
What is the difference between r27 T and r27R?
R =radar guided T = IR/heat guided
Ace/Simba
Next time carry an Apple AirTag.
@Grim Reapers Hey Cap, probably the wrong place to do this but...I've just seen this video on Ward Carroll's channel (no doubt you have too) czcams.com/video/-VPd7mji_2g/video.html&ab_channel=WardCarroll of Mongo's MIG kill and was wondering if you and a few of the valued humans could recreate the bit from the flight leads perspective of the 2 MIG splashes either side of him, please? The segment in question is between 7:30 (ish) - 14:00 (ish). Regardless of whether you do or not, love the content, really hope I get the chance to fly with you guys someday.
Thanks Gibbon!
anyone remember the “..they´ll get killed looking good” comment at 2:49 from a previous encounter 2 years ago against kiap guys? soo funny to remember hahahahah!!
czcams.com/video/xamX4qR414U/video.html