PhD Christian Scientist Exposes the HUGE Faults in Cosmic Evolution
Vložit
- čas přidán 15. 02. 2024
- Scientists who don’t start with the Bible don’t know anything about the origins of the universe.
Dr. Terry Mortenson exposes the major flaws in naturalistic explanations of the origins of the cosmos, ranging from the origins of the moon all the way to their understanding of the origins of the universe. When we actually examine the evidence, it ends up pointing to a Creator!
This video is part of a series titled Defending a Young Earth with Terry Mortenson. You can watch the rest of the series here: www.Answers.tv/defending-a-yo...
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our CZcams channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give
Those who call God a liar, and contend with His Record of events, simply Refuse to give God the Glory He deserves, and will continue to discredit His Handiwork, and His Authority.
God isn't a liar but some of his followers have a Pinocchio nose extending around the block.
Can’t be a liar if you never existed in truth
@@cs5250 You're not smart enough to be an Atheist, an Agnostic maybe, but you need not be without knowledge, just do some homework, and stop believing human liars. I don't get paid anything to say I believe God, they get paid to conjecture anything, and everything but God. Better to investigate fully than to mock.
This is one of the best summaries of the attitude of humans
@@cs5250 You are not smart enough to be an atheist, maybe an agnostic, but I wouldn't revel in just claiming lack of knowledge. Do your homework, and realize that
humans lie, and make conjectures based on assumptions, that doesn't make God a reality, but it certainly doesn't rule out a Creator. You don't know if God exists. I have
amassed more than enough data to believe that He exists, but I am overjoyed to know that Divine Justice will prevail, and that Gods Plan is Perfect. it is sad that you wish
to mock God rather than put forth the effort to thoroughly study the matter. What if our eternal destinies are bound up with Him, what will you have missed?
Matthew 7:13 &14 Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. 14“For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.
An amazing package I find myself going back to over and over again.
You can thank Zoroastrianism in Persia for the construction of that concept. It's considered the earliest religion. Christianity owes a lot to preceding religions.
i love that one...
You are very wise.
@@iamall964 I don't get how parroting words that describe a fantasy is "wisdom".
It is thermodynamically impossible for a cloud of gas to collapse into a star; it reaches hydrostatic equilibrium long before fusion ignites in the core. I don't think creation scientists are talking about this enough. We have never observed the "birth" of a star.
Absolutely correct and never will happen. That’s equivalent to a human being dying but taking their life back. Absolutely impossible.
You people are hilarious....the vile arrogance to think you know more than the experts while believing in talking donkeys and snakes and people living in whales etc....hahahah
@@ChrisFerguson-zm4gtsomething to consider with your argument is that the experts we are supposed to believe don’t agree. Professional, peer-reviewed journals have become a joke, and there is no place that the common man can go to find objective truth. “Scientists/science educators will take a hypothesis which have not been objectively proven or disproven and run with it just to have to walk it back when the next idea comes along. Just my thoughts, I don’t want to argue, but these very real problems in the field of academics have to be addressed. Until they are, people will continue to believe what they see as a reliable view of existence.
@@thurlravenscroft2572 bs
@@ChrisFerguson-zm4gt deep thoughts 🙄
I met Hugh Ross years back, even attended a seminar or Two... Something was off then and Thank you for confirming the up to date accurately
Hugh Ross doesn't believe in evolution or a naturalistic origin of the universe, so if this video confirmed that he does, you have been mislead.
Ross tailors Genesis to the current fads in evolution.
@@seaknightvirchow8131 NONSENSE!
Why do you spread gossip?!
Why does he keep saying "evolutionists"? Evolution theory is about biology, not astronomy
@@MutsPub It is not gossip, it is fact. Did you watch the video or have you ever read HR’s interpretation of Genesis 1? Evolutionary assertions are constantly changing and what was considered fact yesterday might not be fact tomorrow. Accommodating so called science which might be in error to the interpretation of Genesis is poor exegesis if you are teaching scripture. Science is about what exists not about how it came into existence. As far as time, the geologic columns are about an event, a global flood, not millions of years of time. HR believes in a day age interpretation of Genesis but this is not only unnecessary, it is ridiculous. Ross and so many others in the end, are intimating that God does not know how to express himself and that we had to wait for 3000 years for a correction. If you agree with HR that’s up to you.
Never believed the big bang. There is no way they could possibly know. We have God's first hand account. I'll sticj with that! God bless
where is god first hand account? Where is god to begin with? tell him to come and show himself. If he has something to say about the origin of the universe, that's interesting. Tell him he his welcome. Bring him. Got some beer for him.
You have the lying clergy's man-made Yahweh and all the fictional accounts of his life and numerous "facts" the clergy conjured. The clergy wrote the Bible, including "And God Said...." All religion is mythology. People don't lie for no reason. For the clergy, religion is a con game. Always consider the clergy's motives.
You ask him yourself if you are so brave.
The Wife Theory is obviously not true since the moon's orbit is a near-perfect circle. If the moon was gravity captured, it would not have a near-perfect circle orbit but far more of an oval or elliptical orbit. The moon is also in constant tidal-lock meaning the same side facing us all the time (I think Saturn's moon Iapetus also has near-perfect circular orbit with tidal lock).
Remember that the earth is moving too. IF they were traveling in roughly the same direction and speed it could enter the orbit at a near circle. This is how the lunar missions get into an almost circular orbit with the moon without expending a lot of fuel to slow down. See Low Energy Transfer Orbital Maneuver.
@switzerlandful
That's an interesting idea.
But all of the deep time hypotheses have problems that relate to the circularity of the lunar orbit.
That is, no matter how the orbit started out, it should have turned into a perfect circle long, long ago.
Kind of like a magnet orbiting another magnet.
They invariably start out elliptical, but are forced into a circle with relatively few revolutions.
So, ironically, the out of roundness that the lunar orbit does have is strong evidence that it hasn't been there for millions of years, let alone billions.
The key is Saturrn
@@j.pershing2197 Isn't Saturn the key Ring?
@@gregoswald7723
Our 0² molecules match only those found in the rings of Saturn. Saturday is named after Saturn. Some of this will sound unbelievable but Saturn with her axial tilt belonged to a family group. This group all have the same axial tilts. Saturm was a brown dwarf star that was captures by a larger main sequence star, the sun. For a time there was a celeatial alignment of planets after Saturna system was pulled into the new hybrid system. This appeared in space for a long time forming "the cosmic wheel, lotus, squatterman and many other peteoglyphs foumd around the world. The Eye of Ra, osiris etc. When this formation broke up Saturn had a nova event and was pushed back. Venus was born and flew by on its way to the current orbit. But it was known as the Wondering Star, Morning Star and at times dragon or serpent. This depended on the ionization of plasma. Our ancient ancestors left us evidence all over earth. If u want to know more plz ask. I will send u reference points. Gotta go to work. Have a nice day
What happens when you dispense a gas in a vacuum? Does it collapse, or does it spread?
How on earth did a theory that defies all odds of thermodynamics become accepted and established ?
Gravitational pull. How is the sun and gas planets different. Look at sun - a great ball of gas.
In an environment that's a vacuum and has no gravity the gas would cling together by its gravitational pull.
All mass attracts mass.
Please elaborate how it is a problem to any law of thermodynamics
Apparently there remains significant confusuion, why gaseous masses do not gravitationally collapse.
First of all, according to Newton's laws of motion, if you dispense particles into the void, these particles will move randomly in all directions.
Second, the second law of thermodynamics states that entropy always increases and never decreases. Meaning the particles will continue to drift appart.
Third, even if the mass between two particles would be sufficient enough to attract each other to cause a collision, the particles are not deformed and no kinetic energy is lost during the collission. Imagine two balls thrown at each other: They bounce off of each other and don't clump together into a larger mass.
This is all based on observations, so any model must be able to account for these phenomena. And since we are not talking about an isolated and closed system, the idea of gravitaional collapse doesn't hold ground.
Um, you do realize that the Earth's atmosphere is surrounded by a vacuum too?
@@d3m3n70r The repellent force of a gas varies indirectly by the radius squared of the gas cloud. The gravitational force on a cloud of gas varies directly with the cube of the radius. Hence, if the cloud of gas is big enough, it will condense.
Also shockwaves and electrostatic forces seem to enhance star formation.
If you get the first question in the Bible wrong then you will get almost everything else wrong.
“Did God really say…?” Has to be “Yes”
amen.....
What would God have to say anything that don't even make sense
God's did not write to Bible, his disciples did.
And your point is?@@Laurie-eg8ct
@@jasonlogan5765 Gen 3:1 the serpent ask Eve “Indeed, has God said, ‘You shall not eat from any tree of the garden’?” The meaning being is God’s Word true. Which would include all of Scripture. It’s either yes or no. If you say no then your understanding of the world made by God will always be subject to error. He gave use His Word to understand Him and His creation.
It ultimately boils down to 2 scientific laws: Consistency and Conservation.
The Consistency Principle states that the laws that govern nature today always have and always will.
The Law of Conservation states that matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed.
If matter and energy cannot be created today through natural phenomena, then it couldn't have been created in the beginning through natural phenomena.
If Creation ever occurred, it therefore must have been a Supernatural event.
The consistency principle doesn't account for that which we don't know. Matter can obviously be created, as God did so. It could be that God operates entirely outside of the laws of our universe, or it could be that we simply haven't discovered all of the laws. The law of conservation may or may not be valid. Let me put it this way, had we used some of our current science today, 1000 years ago, they would have said, "That violates the laws of consistency principle, therefore it must be of God" What we don't know is more important than what we do know. In this case at least. I'm not atheist, mind you. I just don't necessarily believe that God operates in ways that are impossible for humans to comprehend on some miniscule level. The Big Bang theory isn't incomprehensible to me, nor do I find it contradictory to the Bible. But again, what do we really know? As Dr Mortenson said over and over, "We don't really know." I don't know either. I'm just not operating under the assumption that what we know today is all we will know.
@@nyestrovicpenchkofferberge3407 If they said "That violates the consistency principle, therefore it must be God" they would have been correct. If Creation can occur through Natural phenomena, in any way, then humans would be able to manipulate those natural phenomena and force it to happen in accordance with our own will. We would become Gods, and Lucifer would win his Rebellion. Creation is, and can only be, the unique power of God. I'm not guessing.
@@nyestrovicpenchkofferberge3407 "Matter can obviously be created, as God did so." The Law of Conservation is property of the universe and as such, applies to natural processes. God isn't constrained by physical properties within His creation so it doesn't not follow that because God can do it, natural processes can as well.
Glory to GOD. I thank and praise you Father God for all the beauties and wonders of the earth and universe. Blessed be your name great creator of everything in heaven and here on earth. Ruler of the universe and all things in it. I love you heavenly Father. Praise the LORD JESUS CHRIST.
I don’t mind the models being based upon naturalistic laws as we use simulations to figure out many things. But, like using FEA for stress calculations, there must be a physical experiment to verify and calibrate the simulations to in order to know that it actually mode,a how nature works.
The largest issues are assumptions that bias the simulations. How much are the programmers biasing the simulations from expected behavior to create a desired result.
The most apparent bias in biblical creation models is the assumption two individuals can establish a long-term genetically viable population.
@@jasonborn867that's funny because DNA evidence shows that our current human population did come two individuals
@@jasonborn867 ??? Did you not realize that ALL genetic research has validated the young earth timeline with only one potential exception. The Neanderthals, who were just a group of humans, had many more mutations, although we have no example have their mutation rate
@@mikeb1596 Correct, but scientific Adam did not live in the same generation as scientific Eve, and these African ancestors lived hundreds of millennia before recent bronze age Mesopotamian shepherds and farmers. But based on the biblical story Eve was formed from Adam's rib, so roughly what percentage of genes do you believe they shared?
@@Austin1990 Biblical propositions such as humanity descending from two individuals and human parthenogenesis is supported by faith in unseen evidence. There is no observable scientific evidence of these notions and also explains why Bigfoot isn't real.
Fab video. "They can't all be wrong, can they? ... Yes they can." Loved it.
I have long reached the conclusion that any theory of natural history is imposible to be scientific in the strict sense of the definition.
Current physics models are great to predict current natural phenomenon, but going back and reconstructing natural history is imposible.
Take for example the big bang theory vs plasma cosmology, one favours gravity the other electro magnetism...
You don't understand the definition.
The reason big bang is more accepted than plasma cosmology or electric universe is that the big bang model (like the other models) make predictions and the big bang models predictions is better and more in line of what we observe.
which is why science searches for a unified theory!
Right, nothing beyond the past couple of hundred of years or so has been observed. Everything beyond that point is extrapolation, or more simply stated - guessing.
Observation and Measurement? No, Guessing.
"Right, nothing beyond the past couple of hundred of years or so has been observed. ...ment? No, Guessing."
Not true, we receive light from every point in time backwards so we can on daily basis see what happen million of years back
Imagine that the current naturalistic theories of how stars came about and evolution become something similar to stories of Zeus, Thor, and such in the future. That would be very funny.
fairy tales lol
Pay attention to symbols and you'll find out its not something you've imagined as a comedian. Those princes are re-emerging and they're gaining followers.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 No, the Bible has been found to be historically and scientifically accurate even thousands of years before modern day scientists confirmed observations chronicled in it pages. For instance...at the time of Moses...GOD provided laws on human hygiene...well before modern microscopes were around to confirm germs. Louis Pasteur who authored the process of pasteurization did so because milk was contaminated by germs making it harmful to drink. God thousands of years prior commanded what man should eat and what to refrain from. He gave medical advice on diseases such of Leprosy. And even told those obtaining metals like bronze, gold or silver as the spoils of war were to heat them in fire to sanitize them. The Hebrews knew this because God revealed it to them.
We have very good evidence of how stars form and how life evolves.
@@jockyoung4491 And what would that very good evidence be?
If a simulation based on our best knowledge from ALL our observations confirms that an event is plausible, then it can become a valid hypothesis. The fact that we actually didn't see an event happen, doesn't mean that it's not possible or that there are not mechanisms by which that event is possible.
Also, the Moon's orbit is not exactly in the same plane as the Earth and the Sun, it's plane is tilted by 5º. If it was exactly ecliptic, we would have two eclipses every month.
Also most moons in the solar system are not alligned to the Equator.
Our Creator God is MAGNIFICENT IN HIS PERFECTION AND GLORY!! Praise God! All GLORY TO HIM!! Thank you Jesus for Your sacrifice ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏
its truly amazing how scientific understanding gets attacked cause the people attacking don't have the knowledge and mental ability to understand and keep repeating...'no one saw if happen so u can't prove it.'..
then say everything was made by the invisible man in the sky with absolute zero proof...but thats ok ...cause someone can twist the bible "written by man' to justify...ignoring anything in the bible they don't like.
I always wonder what goes through the heads of people that lived their whole lives in rebellion to God up to dying apart from Christs forgiveness and standing before him in judgement. I would say more fear, awe , wonder and regret than they could ever imagine.
Thank you Answers in Genesis for speaking truth!
Thank you Jesus, for having mercy on my wayward heart and bringing me through your grace in to your Heavenly Kingdom.
Even here we have comments of individuals claiming God to be nothing more than a fairytale. I feel sorry for them because I know there will come a day when their hearts will sink when they stand before the Lord. Hopefully many of them will see the truth before their time is up.
@@lukebryant6523well said!!
@@lukebryant6523that's funny, maybe if your truth was remotely true people would have an easier time believing it. Personally I've died before and your Jesus certainly wasn't there nor was whatever blood thirsty monster you worship as god. I hope when you go you aren't too regretful of wasting your life in servitude to an archaic idea of a monster designed by wicked men to subdue their followers.
I can't think of any way I would live my life differently whether God existed or not, so I really don't worry about it.
@@lukebryant6523 so how do u think works...u believe in Jesus and all ur sins will be forgiving and given eternal happiness.....sounds to me like a bunch of people making themselves feel better for all the crappy things they do ..want to cheat on ur wife...its all good cause jesus will forgive u in the end. give me a break.
indeed, everywhere - from the stars to man - the picture is the same: we see complex and perfectly thought out structures which exist in a ready-made and ready-to function forms and could not evolve from simpler forms.
Greetings from Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania, USA. Thank you for sharing your knowledge and understanding. The Lord God Jehovah is an awesome God!
What about the moons of all the planets?
I continuously found myself laughing thought out the entirety of this video. It’s is amazing how much we claim to know, yet we have no damn idea what we know. The thing that really got to me is that science suggests that stars shouldn’t even exist, yet they do. Sometimes I have really struggled and doubted within my faith of God, but this just made me sit back and laugh. Who am I to doubt the One who created the stars and the skies, for us measly people can say that a God is not real, that God is dead, yet we can’t even explain our own existence, much less any other existence surrounding our own. We quite literally have no idea about how anything has ever even came to be, yet we can have completely certainty that it came to be by CHANCE, and that even then, we can’t explain how that nothing came from something without using the same man made science that says stars shouldn’t even exist. God created the heavens and the earth. Father forgive my ignorance and doubts ✝️
I know we havent observed the creation of stars, but Hugh would say we have because of observing light that supposedly left from the past you can see past events? Why is that incorrect?
Thank YOU, the truth is logical and builds a strong foundation to stand upon. Hugh Ross and others like him SEW DOUBT. Why? What is their intent? May Gods people desire HIS Truth and share it, for HIS GLORY
The heavens declare the glory of God, and the sky above proclaims his handiwork. -Psalm 19:1
Firmament not sky
This sounds "off" to me. It reads beautifully in the King James Bible.
Let go that YEC only can pull out a Phd in history of geology to present Astronomy and argue against a professional Astronomers
Hugh did not say that 2003, it is till Karen, also the quote from 2012 is Bob not Hugh.
This guy mix quotes and years and use magazines as source, not a very reliable source.
The reason for "solve the mystery of the origin" is that the material that moon is made of, is demonstrated to come from Earth.
Other planets have solar eclipse, so their moons are in the ecliptic.
It seems that this guy in the video os the who does not know anything
I am happy to see apologetic articles about the Christian vision of creation and the origin of the universe.🙏👍
In psalm 18 it is said: "The heavens (i.e. the “Univers” declare the glory of God and the work of his hands declares his power".
It's just that many scientists prefer a world without God, so as not to feel the pressure of conscience for the "report" that
we will all give, when we meet Him, face to face.
These people are actually scared, because they do not know the Father's unconditional love for His children.
He is only waiting for a sign from us, because he gave us total freedom in this world.
yep. total freedom to not stray from the dogma and to submit our thought to traditional beliefs.
i'll pass the authoritarian claim, thanks.
Thank you. I could not have said it better 😉. Here is a thought that just occerred to me: how would an evolution process be likely given the mind boggling distance between stars that are also following a similar tragectory? Gasses heat up when compressed beyond the attractive force of gravity thus twarting formation, furthermore there is solid evidence that stars are liquid, not gas. On and on and on. It would not be difficult to come up with a cosmology based on the Bible, even though it is not a science book per se.
gravity explained: "The magnitude of this force depends upon the mass of each object and the distance between the centers of the two objects. Mathematically, we say the force of gravity depends directly upon the masses of the objects and inversely upon the distance between the objects squared." For objects to attract each other they must at least be of a size and adequate distance from each other. So how does an object that is singular explode? How does the ejection of energy create mass? How do the masses created begin to form unless there is some logic and order that causes it to happen. If Logic exist in us, how, unless it preexists in nature. Every attempt to discover how things began while rejecting the explanation given by revelation is the description of Genesis that humility and obedience are eliminated when we out of pride try to eat of the Tree of Knowledge and become separated from the Tree of Life thereby.
What are you saying?
Energy is equal to mass times the speed of light in a vacuum squared. That is how the ejection of energy can create mass. Gravity is what usually pulls thing together after.
@@tone9358 At the moment before the explosion the entirety of the universe was supposedly a singularity. Something that does not take up space, ther was no time as time is a dimension of space and space did not exist, effectively there is no mass ( no matter) there was no space nor time. So How did a timeless construct 'explode' or expand ?
Big bang happened it is a point of Creation and is easily attributed to a prime mover we cannot see. This is easily God. Science is confined to nature it isn't unexpected that it does not see the supernatural if such phenomenon can't be codified by us.
i will try to answer your questions.
1. How does an object that is singular explode?
By this, I'm assuming that you are asking how a planet could explode.
Planets are not rigid objects, like a boulder would be. They are, from a cosmic perspective, like balls of sand. If you were to go outside and pick up a rock, you would be holding a small piece of the earth in your hand. You were able to separate that part of our planet from the rest of it, and quite easily too. This is because gravity is by far the weakest of the four fundamental forces of the universe, so it can easily be overcome by other forces. So, when a massive force is applied, such as a planetary collision, there is enough energy for a planet to explode; its gravity cannot hold itself together any longer. I highly recommend watching a simulation of planets colliding. They almost look like water droplets!
2. How does the ejection of energy create mass?
I'm not sure what you mean by this. However, mass cannot be created or destroyed.
3. How do the masses created begin to form [together] unless there is some logic and order that causes it to happen?
Yes, there is an order that causes it to happen! It is the fundamental force of gravity.
4. How does logic exist in us unless it preexists in nature?
This isn't scientific, but I agree with you. I believe that our system of logic was built around how our universe works.
Beautiful!
This is a very realistic explanations of the forming and evolution of the earth and the moon and the solar system.
Nothing explains any of it, but they can’t say that because … God
Super. Nice and clear.
Excellent Scriptural (divine supernatural spoken & written revelation) and scientific (observable, regular, & repeated occurrences or revelation) apologetics that fit the facts! Great job Dr. Mortenson!
Not even close. Terrible lecture if you are someone who understands science.
Why has it been that we've been in God's good graces in the United States for over 250 years believing in the Bible in Jesus Christ and now that we've pulled him out Jesus Christ the Lord and Savior that our nation is starting to fall and collapse?
A vast majority of America hasn't believed the gospel since America was birthed. Nothing has changed. Just because someone calls themselves a believer, doesn't mean they actually believe.
God is not a puppet master,, he sent us to school with a free will.. we are responsible for our actions,, like your parrents don't cotrol you life,, blaming God is pathetic.
@@donaage6303 Check out Romans 9:18, and then compare it with Joshua 11:20.
@@daygrindmike8913 haha so u think 🤔
@@donaage6303 God is always in control
Nice 👌
one thing he missed is that the shadow of the earth during a lunar eclipse appears to be exactly the size of the moon. which I think adds to the solar eclipse story.
When you see the Earth’s Shadow depart the moon, take a look at the arc of the shadow…It’s somewhat larger than the moon. This is the size the Earth should look from the moon.
"But my woke university professor scientist told me so".😂
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of the culture." - Creationist Pastor Ray Mummert at the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial. 😂🤣😅
@@annieoaktree6774 🥱
Projection, eh?
@@annieoaktree6774 Oh no not intelligent people! Cause we all know the world works better when people are ignorant and barely read one book yet thunk they know it all is better than educated people who realize they still have much to learn.
same i just dont buy it 😁, Amen God Bless
The jelly donut hypothesis is certainly the most appetizing 😂
How do you have gas pressure without a container Danny?
For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.
Hebrews 4:12
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work
.
2 Timothy 3:16-17
Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path.
Psalm 119:105
I've asked that question many times.... point to the night sky and show me yesterday there was no start and today there is a star there. I have searched the net. Based on their framework, new starts should be popping up all the time. Maybe not on a daily basis but certainly on a yearly basis. If in fact their mechanism is correct.
You obviously have no idea how stars are born and how quickly light travels through empty space
In recorded human history, we've observed stellar collapse in the form of a supernova. One specific star got very bright for about a month and then very dim until it wasn't visible. The reason why we don't see stars "pop up" is because proto-stars also give off light. Odds are that many of the "stars" you see in the night sky aren't really undergoing stable fusion, and thusly are not quite stars yet.
Stellar formation takes place over hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years. It's likely that, for the entire couple hundred thousand years humans have been making fire, we've never observed a gas cloud collapse into a star from start to finish. Though we do occasionally see stars go supernova, far more regularly than we watch stars form
I feel compelled to inform you that all the stars you can see with your naked eye are incredibly close and compose an insanely tiny fraction of our own galaxy. As in there are stars being born and popping into existence all the time, we can't see them without telescopes though. Buy one maybe?
Protostars goes not give off observable light. In order for us to observe it with the naked eye, it already needs to be doing fusion. And quoting you: "Though we do occasionally see stars go supernova, far more regularly than we watch stars form" Okay. point me to one of these stars that we have seen born.@@xXMACEMANXx
okay. give me the coordinate and telescope used to show me a star birth. Give me before and after pictures, the name of the star, it's coordinates and the telescope used.@@kevinhank17
Wonderful.
One of best video. A lot dusturbing quotes from evolutionary authors. Just you forgot to add few quotes from Bible, including Romans 2.
The truth points to six day creation! All of the planets and different systems display an order of creativity!
Amen 🙏
The Bible points to a 6-day creation AND a single day creation. The accounts in Genesis 1 are not the same as Genesis 2.
So, if the Bible isn't sure how long it took, how did YOU decide you knew the right answer?
@@saintmalaclypse3217 Genesis 2 is a more detailed view of day 6 of creation. Nothing different at all.
@@IAMhassentyouYou just admitted you didn't even read the first chapters of the Bible lol. The stories ARE different, but keep lying. Your god would love that.
@@fohrum4757 no they aren't. You've just admitted you are lying and deceiving. Typical atheist.
Great presentation! In the late 1800s, British Scientists declared that they had discovered everything there was to know about the world. In a hundred years, the majority of what we presently regard as “scientific fact” will have been relegated to the trash can of discarded human hypotheses. The “Church of Scientific Consensus” is as much a religion (i.e., a box humans place themselves into which helps them to orientate themselves within an astoundingly mysterious Multiverse) as any other. ❤
Nobody saw god create moon therefore Bible wrong.
Nobody saw god create sun therefore Bible wrong.
Nobody saw man write down Bible therefore god not real.
Huh I can play that game too
This guy is so adamant no one observing things that happened so long ago. Just because it wasn’t observed doesn’t mean it couldn’t be true
If something isn’t observed and won’t or can’t be scientifically proven with experiments, then how do you make a conclusion?
@@JesseDavis7373 you have to make assumptions based on scientific processes and our understanding of how things work now
Love it!
Thanks for this introduction.
I'm nearing the end at 69+, but in my tweets and twenties wanted to become an astrophysicist. In that early period I too wanted to believe the lie of the scientific method, but forgot to remind myself, they abandoned that path and jumped from hypothesis to accepted theories. No testing of any hypothesis.
However, in spite of this, one day in my thirties, I took a leap of faith in God and decided the Word of God is the record of truth No matter what man said. It wasn't long after taking that stand God showed me the truth behind the lies and led me to Answers in Genesis.
I received degrees in Chemical and Civil Engineering becoming an aerospace materials engineer and a bridge designer.
That's wonderful! God bless you ❤
God is Amazing!!
• Geocentrism was universally held, in some form, among every culture for the first 5,500 years of human history
• 1543 - Roman Catholic (jesuit relations) astronomer Nicholas Copernicus broke with history, science, and Christianity to put forth his theory of heliocentrism
• 1600 - Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe used observations to validate the Ptolemaic System of geocentrism, that everything in the heavens revolved around the earth, not the sun
• 1601 - Johannes Kepler, Brahe's assistant who was strongly influenced by Roman Catholic Jesuits, is suspected of murdering Brahe, stealing his life's work, and claiming that his research actually supported heliocentrism instead of geocentrism
• 1609 - Galileo came to the defense of Kepler, with the support of the Jesuits, and claimed to have used his telescope to have corroborated heliocentrism
• 1600 to present - Jesuits and secret societies have consistently advanced the theory of heliocentrism to advance their larger agenda of Illuminism and the coming religion of Mystery Babylon..
Hes saying its a theory that nobody researched! Its just a theory that more than one person agreed it with so they made it seem like fact when in actually its just a guess that other people liked
Wrong. You still don't understand what a scientific theory is: it's a model for explaining a natural phenomenon. It holds much more value than believing in religious myths.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440
Seriously, if you were born centuries ago, you would proclaim phlogiston as the fact in the name of science.
Apparently, so-called "scientists" are surprised to find out "now" that gender is actually spectrum.
"Trust the science" they say. Could not even get the fact right on the origin of covid. Actually fooled many people, while enriching others pocket.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440....riiiiiigggggghhhhhtttt! How about some very specific refutations of the contents of this video? I think none will be provided....as per usual.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440The only model that can explain creation is the Creator. No other model can even hope to begin to suffice.
To not understand this is to not understand the nature and utter complexities of existence, as well as and especially of life.
To say that NYC could have been formed by natural processes doesn't even touch it.
It takes excessively simplistic thinking. It takes a tremendous lack of comprehension of the nature of things, and likely a real desire to enter into the mass delusion of denying God's existence. In the final summation, it is inexcusable.
@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 Religious myths? You do realize that Peter and Paul were real people writing about current events, right?
How do you know that stories in the bible aren't true? How exactly did you come to this conclusion? Sources? Evidence? Were you around at the time and can personally testify that they didn't happen? How did you come upon this information?
Amazing
Bible says the earth doesnt move, but the sun has a circuit, Psalm 19. Joshua 10, Joshua told the Sun to stand still, not the earth to stop spinning. Genesis 1:6 Is there a Firmament or not?
So what calendar did Abraham use??
Thank you, that was a marvelous presentation.
Please 🙏..tell me something that you learned from this video.
(I am a Bible believer)
@@paulgarduno2867It's not about learning. It's about doubting real science and reinforcing the faith of believers so they don't leave. Oh and of course, money!
@mehallica666 if you don't learn from other people, you must be a sorry human being .
Doubting without answers is worthless .
That the picture of the star being birthed was simply a computer generated model. In one of my grandson’s space books, it states that there is a place in the universe where stars are born and they make it sound like it’s a fact. I can’t wait to share this with him. This reminds me of the textbook I had to buy for a college biology class, where most of the pictures and diagrams were simply artists’ renderings of what dinosaurs looked like. I remember thinking that I had paid good money for a comic book!
@@janinefrogge3992 did you expect to see photographs of dinosaurs in those textbooks?:-)
Hi, something I've been struggling with lately is the Septuagint genealogies of Shem. The Septuagint adds between 50 and 100 years of life to the dates that the patriarchs had the next patriarch. This adds between 600 and 700 years of timeline between the flood and Abraham when compared to the much younger maseratic texts. I would love to see you guys cover this topic in detail. This doesn't change my view on a young earth, but it would explain a lot of weird archaeological mysteries that we see in many ancient cultures.
I wonder if there is anything in the Dead Sea Scrolls that matches closer to the Septuagint or the Masoretic. Also the Samaritan Pentateuch.
You do realize that it’s nonsense- the lifespans in the Bible are ridiculously high. 6000 years is a tiny amount of time for the formation of the earth and the drift of continents and formation mountains etc how can it be close to fact. You need to wake up and read something other than fantasy books.
@@22190971 Of course. It doesn't make sense from a human point of view, but it does from a biblical one.
@@22190971 oh yeah? Can you explain away the mathematical impossibility of abiogenesis?
Can you explain the statistical necessity that even given the best evolutionary considerations in favor of beneficial mutations - including the unproven assumption that new genetic information can be spontaneously acquired in an existing genome, which is an action that had NEVER BEEN OBSERVED IN THE HISTORY OF SCIENTIFIC OBSERVATION - the amount of time needed just to get from the genome of an ape-like ancestor to the genome of a human with less than 1% difference would take about the current estimated "age of the earth"???
Can you explain why the strength of the earth's magnetic field - a measurement which is directly correlated with the age of the magnetic field and follows an extremely consistent and predictable degradation function over time - indicates that it has only been in existence for at most 10,000 years? In fact, can you explain why all the planets in our solar system that have had their magnetic field measured all measure much higher strength than what they should be? Indicating they are all also only about 10,000 old at most?
Can you explain why the earth's moon is BY FAR the largest moon relative to a planet's size that has ever been observed? Or why it's orbit is nearly circular and stable? considering the only possible ways that scientists can figure out that earth acquired the moon, with orbital equations of motion and computer models with very generous assumptions, are that the earth had to have acquired a moon of that size from wildly catastrophic circumstances that would have resulted in an extremely elliptical orbit? Or how this would have also likely caused an irregular earth orbit? Or how this would have almost certainly would have caused an irregular tilt of our axis, or irregular speed or direction of rotation, or a dramatic procession (wobble) of our axis?
Can you explain why all the major layers of sedimentary rock are present over the entire globe, and are consistent with a fluid dynamic precipitation pattern of being laid down by a massive amount of turbulent water all around the globe at the same time?
Can you explain how the Bible - the oldest book in the world, written over 1500 years, written by at least 40 different authors, which has been more critically examined with the intent to disprove than any other writing in history - could have withstood thousands of years of attack and criticism without ever being disproven to be historically accurate?
The correct answer to all of these questions, and many more like them, is "no I can't"... Because nobody can answer these questions from a naturalistic uniformitarianism world view. Every "answer" secular scientists give to these types of questions just begs even more questions, and kicks the proverbial can further the road and further back in time.
Everything makes sense (aside from the oldest monuments and cultures) from a biblical world view that sees the Bible as historically accurate. If you factor in the Septuagint genealogies that I mentioned in my original post, the time table for the emergence of the earliest cultures and monuments coincides perfectly with the time several hundred years after the global flood.
There is so much data from every field of science that points to a much younger earth than what had been sold to us by the accepted narrative of mainstream science.
Like these guys have said, "it's not a head problem, it's a heart problem." The evidence is there for anyone to see the truth, but not everyone wants to.
@@shayalynn the dead sea scrolls, Josephus, and the Samaritan pentateuch, all agree with the Septuagint.
The Septuagint is also at least 1,400 years older than the maseratic text.
Jesus and the disciples used the Septuagint, as it was the most widely available translation of the old testament circulated during this time.
The near perfect sphere shape of the moon tells us it didn't come the earth.
If it started as a molten glob of rock formed from the esrth, it would be jagged and blob shaped as it cooled without any natural erosion, making it smooth and spherical.
Great video!! Well researched and professionally delivered. I really enjoyed this one, thank you for sharing. New subscriber due to this program.
Awesome explanation and so thankful to our Lord for giving us the answer in Genesis.
Not an explanation- just ramblings of an ignorant religious nut job
Excellent presentation. I've heard "scientists" such as Coyne and Dawkins belittle creationists time and time again, and yet creation scientists are the ones who inform others of the gaping holes in the claims of mainstream scientists. I find that to be invaluable and what is desperately needed to advance the pursuit of science today.
Asking questions is good, but then you have to accept the answers. Most scientific claims are well supported by evidence.
Space is fake, CGI . The Earth is flat with a firmament and waters above the firmament.
Wake up!
@@jesus4400🐑
@@dinfast"nuh uh" -dinfast
@@jockyoung4491like life coming from not-loving material? Like material coming from nothing at all? Those theories are supported by evidence?
Just a comment here and correction. The Moon does not revolve in the equatorial plane of the Earth or in the ecliptic plane. The lunar orbit is inclined 5.1 degrees to the ecliptic, whereas the Earth's equatorial plane is inclined at 23.4 degrees. Otherwise a very good article!
And called all the stars out by name and the stars of heaven shouted with joy
wisdom starts with the fear of God. These people only fool themselves, fooled they are in deed.
In my bible it says “and he made the stars also”. like it was an after thought….. like it was nothing for Him to do.
indeed, the fear of god, even in heaven you won't have a second of respite, you'll be a lobotomized blob... but you're not going to heaven, because you can't stop coveting... enjoy.
Well would be an after thought to those who wrote the Bible as thousands of years ago stars were thought to be mere points of light, not object comparable to the Sun, This is one very good reason why its complete bunkum to view the Bible as a historically or scientifically accurate text book. It isn't, those who think it is are deluded - its a religious text book, for the use of, those who adhere to that religion. It has no relevance for those looking for knowledge of astronomy, geology or history, nor for those who aren't Christian (which may surprise Christians, especially those of American persuasion, means around 80% of the world's population...) You wouldn't use a cookbook to learn car mechanics, and so you shouldn't use a thousands of years old religious text to learn about astrophysics in the 21st Century.
@@roydodds3693 true, even the exile in Egypt and the Exodus was just made up... they thrive on being the persecuted underdogs...
There are mantel anomalies due to proposed 4.5 billion yr old theia or tiamat impact. The broken foreign body has a higher density which creates a higher heat that we can detect which also drew the foreign bodies deeper inside the impact remolten earth mantel.
The moon material does not fully match earth. A trade occured and its composed of us in part in a collision that left it molten to reassume a spherical nature, earth as well.
Pluto TV has a documentary that suggests the moon was brought her by space aliens, and they were inside it for the voyage is why it is hollow. Just like our Apollo capsule, it is lopsided so you can steer it.
"Take this quarter go downtown and have a rat gnaw that thing off of your face" Uncle Buck
computer simulations or models only spit out date according to what was fed into the computer, they had to start the simulation with data in to get data out, and that data had to come from assumptions made before they put the data in, a simulation will not work if you do not put something in for it to model. faulty input leads to faulty output.
So how many of these simulations are there, and which one is the right one, the one that gets the most votes as being closest to what they believe already?
God bless this man, for sharring his knowledge with us
He knows nothing,
9:22 WHY would the evolutionists know how the moon came into existence?!?
Wow... Blows my mind!
Nobody knows for sure, but there are some pretty good guesses based on observational and research data
@@xXMACEMANXx oh sorry, I just realized that my message was misleading.... For me, when the "PhD Christian scientist" was talking about evolutionists, I thought he referred to the theory of evolution (which has nothing to do with the history of our moon, thus my original comment).
But thanks for your reply!
@@christopheespic My mistake, I misunderstood.
@christopheespic
But Evolution claims everything evolved from the Big Bang, does it not ?
Planets, Moons, Stars, Earth and everything on it.
@@bobKringe when talking about evolutionists, one usually refer to the Darwin's theory of evolution of species.... Thus my first comment. The Big Bang theory and cosmology describe the evolution you refer to.
When the Apollo came back from the moon in 1969, people studied rocks they found out it contained H3O, on Earth water is H2O, Mars is CO2 thanks to all the probes we've been sending.
Notice how theories are subject to details and review. Hypothesis may look like one thing. Creation is the same. Some mysteries look like design. Funny, no one ever witnessed creation or design either. Scientists are willing to seek answers by starting with hypothesis at least. Perhaps they dont have ALL the answer but they have more answers than religious myth and the unobserved creation or design. But hey, just a story and fairy tale.
if a moon formed from Debris we would still have a ring of Debris going around the earth
at 8:15 you say moon is ecliptic orbit but it is actually 5% off and atlernates up 5% down 5% to which we have total eclipses NOT every month but every so often instead.
How long does it take rings to dissipate? And you do know that saturn's rings are disappearing don't you?
The moon's orbit isn't perfectly aligned, but just about nothing is in the universe. The probability of its approximate alignment is quite low. Then you factor in all the other probabilities in creation, such as the moon and sun being the same relative size in the sky, the earth having a full water cycle, the gravitational constant, etc., and the probability of intelligent life forming in our given planet becomes lower than the number of particles in the universe. That's why people who think there must be life on other planets haven't crunched the numbers properly.
@@litigioussociety4249 The moons orbit is not perfectly aligned. Compared to what?
I don't factor anything into creation because I reject the term creation. Its a term meant to poison the well.
Until you prove creation of something I do not accept your assertion Of creation.
@@RobertSmith-gx3mi "I reject the term creation" because you reject the creator of the Universe....Jesus the Christ ...the Word who spoke everything into existence and as the bible states through Him everything consists...stays together.
@@alantasman8273 Yeah, that about sums it up. I reject the word creation because you've never proven there's a creator of the universe. I think I said that already?
I think your problem is you think making an assertion about a creator makes that assertion true which is the same circular logic that says the bible is true because the bible says it's true.
Good stuff! 👌
Ótimo vídeo parabéns e muito obrigado.
I just don’t understand how, knowing that we don’t really know much about this, the children are constantly being fed fairy tales and assumptions as if it is truth. These children grow up to believe that because it is in a school textbook it is real and then they and their parents see the Bible as fairy tails. It’s sad.
NASA is still trying to discover what I knew in the early 1960's. As a young child, I had something most scientists lack to this day: fairh.
You are correct: Scientists do not believe in ***MAGIC***.
Faith is something they will never have but their knowledge will grow leaps and bounds changing even your life while you keep your faith.
I recommend on CZcams: To Scale: THE SOLAR SYSTEM and Making of - To Scale: The Solar System Intuitively you should understand that the evolutionary explanation for it's formation is bogus, in so many ways.
Glory be to God! What is man that thou at mindful of. Everything God made is perfect and we are full of awe for His handiworks.
"No one saw it happen, therefore it never happened" 🙄
Excellent.
And here's the one I like they can't explain why the universe is drifting apart apart faster and faster and not slower and slower as the law of thermodynamics would prefict or whatever any other law they come up with
And yet you can prove that a god spoke the universe into existence- how did it do that ?
The bible says God spreads the heavens.
@@tommysonnier9848 what’s that ? The Bible says - it’s a book
I've been following mr ham before the internet
I have to mention the electric hypothesis, namely for comet functions. I think its been discredited somewhat from overreaching claims, but one wonders why the electric force is ignored in any formative theories when its magnitudes more powerful than gravity. Funny story, I casucally mentioned this to below avg intelligence roommate once, and he goes, oh yeah, I know about that. I was shocked and asked how? His science teacher in high school was an ex -NASA employee. 😮
I have found that the electo-magnetic theoretical model for many astronomic observations to be MUCH more viable than the gravitational theoretical models proposed, as discussed on The Thunderbolts Project CZcams channel and website. Cheers from Seattle!
@@keyscook Yes but they do overreach claiming the earth came from saturn for example without any proof.
@@keyscook also just gravitional collapse of star slowly would account for heat and light over 50,000 years from our sun as figured out by Lord Kelvin
@@cobramcjingleballs I agree - Some of their claims are nuts. I am referring to Birkeland currents / electromagnetic exchange between stars, planets, and beyond have good potential for what is happening + Z-pinch appears to be where star formation is taking place. Cheers!
@@keyscook well I was at first exposed to this by electromagnetic interactions of comets, where they start to form tails far beyond the heat theory out by saturn's orbit. and as I said....my ex roommate knew of this being taught by ex NASA scientist surprised me by no means.
There's no chicken and egg first. God created animals during creation wk, not seeds.
You don't understand Genesis or science.
Wonderful and Perfect GOD CAn make this! not a BOOOOM!
There was no boom. The big bang is not an explosion. It is about expansion.
Mr. Ham is the founder of Answers in Genesis
were you there when god made the Moon?
Note that whenever AiG says according to naturalistic assumptions, they mean according to physics.
No, it means it's a foolish theory and has NOTHING TO DO WITH PHYSICS
@@vld7850 So when Tom Abel plugged his "foolish theory and has NOTHING TO DO WITH PHYSICS" into his virtual observatory & got celestial bodies matching what we observe in other galaxies & solar systems, I guess that was just bunk science.
Alléluia and amamen 🔥💜🔥
The problem with his presentation is that there is no 'theory' of star formation. There is a general idea that stars somehow form from clouds of atoms due to gravity. But there is no theory of how that happens There are hypothesis that will likely never become theories because they are untestable.
You just lost the attention of intended target groups of the video with "there is no 'theory' of star formation"
That is way to complicated reasoning.
There is very detailed theory on how stars formed, most of which has been confirmed by evidence. The Nobel prize for figuring out how the stars form the elements was awarded in 1983.
One thing is for sure is that science is always changing
Improving *
That is why you are able to make a phone call, fertilize the soil, fly in air planes and see the back side of other celestial bodies
It's not always changing. It is stagnant and literally going nowhere. Anything outside the box is ridiculed, ignored and persecuted. Just ask Roger Spurr or Mary Switzer or Tyson Carlson. Roger has game changing evidence to present, but it is being almost completely suppressed by the powers that be.
Just ask Roger Spurr or Mary Switzer or Tyson Carlson. Roger has game changing evidence to present, but it is being almost completely suppressed by the powers that be.
Roger Spurr: Who is that? (is that the guy that claim mud pillars are remains of giants) What have he been silenced about?
(I guess you mean Mary Schweitzer) was asked by her atheist manager, -"Are you sure about it", -"Yes", -"Then publish it"
Tyson Carlson, who is that, what game chinging discoveries does he have under his belt.
FYI:Mary have several times said that YEC should stop misuse her research and do something useful instead.
Science is nowadays just a tool for the pharmacies and powerful companies. If they don't give money for research, there will be no research.Period.
Amen AIG 🙂🙏✝️ thanks for this
I certainly enjoy brother Mortensen, his integrity is ever-present.
This is the kind of science that should be in every school. Not fary tales.
:D
I think you win the internet with that one ... although not in the way you think ;)
I don't think Hue Ross is deceiving anyone. He is just really confident that his model is pretty good. It actually IS a pretty good model.
PSALM 19:1.
"The Heavens DECLARE the GLORY of GOD!"
I'm christian myself, and I find it embarassing when "christians" try to to read the bible as a "scientific" book to explain the material world.
That's a great video 😊 Thank you for speaking out and spreading the truth. Glory to our creator and designer, Brahma! ❤🙏
I loved your video... and do not disagree with you. But, how is binary code based on naturalist or evolutionist ideas? I do not have the answers, hence the question.
Beautiful argument! Whatever science cannot explain, there hides God. Thor was the god of thunder, until he wasn't!
So basically God of the gaps