Meet the Air Force of the future
Vložit
- čas přidán 30. 05. 2024
- Check out the full interview here: • Full interview with Ed...
Thanks to Edge for sponsoring me to Dubai to meet their team and see their awesome products.
NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained
This special video was sponsored by the UAE EDGE group, who invited me to Dubai to see these aircraft up close. I hope to do more videos like this in the future so let me know what you think. #ad
Sick video! Like always!
I loved the video!
Dude, you're getting sponsorships from international conglomerates now? Nice 👌🏼🔥
@@RR-us2kp yea its sick right!
We had no idea…
The “edge chairman” 💀💀💀💀
💀💀💀💀
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
💀💀💀💀💀💀
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
The chairman of edging. CEO of gooning
Looks like flak guns are back bois!
we have ground to air missiles so they're gonna be more used
@@Techreviewe it is cheaper to use proximity shells than missile
Technologies like the DE M-SHORAD, or more traditional CIWS's might start popping up a lot more ...
@@max2008abhiand whats even cheaperv?
Electricity
Lazer aa defence
Are they really needed? Because C-RAM exists
WE GOIN ACE COMBAT WITH THIS ONE BOYS
Fr it's like the whole storyline drones vs fighter jets 😂😂
If anything, drones make aircraft carriers a bigger threat now. So long as the combat drones do not outsize their manned counterparts, there's the possibility of either the carrier having more space for more aircraft or munitions without having to be even bigger.
It becomes a battle of range then. Can the drones outrange the anti ship missiles.
destroyer and corvettes are a bigger threat, imo
since we alr have the tech to make it stealth
@@stevehaney344 prolly not, but that's where the missile ships and careful positioning are for
@@RENO_K better yet, drone ships. if many a poor country fields truly sizable drone ship fleet, i bet even the us navy will feel a bit intimidated.
Nah, Türkiye's aircraft carrier is exclusively UCAV, US already deploy UCAV on their carriers. Drones will. Complement carriers, it will not replace them. That's before realizing an aircraft carrier always travel with a battle group
Swarming drones can possibly jumpstart laser weapon technology. Laser defenses for very small drones won't need that much power and the technology can incrementally develop from there.
Time for a imperial star destroyer for exploration reasons xD
"How many missiles can you fire at a drone that costs five thousand dollars"?
World War Two Flack Cannon has entered the chat.
Flakpanzer Gepard is already in Ukraine.
You know what scarier than aircraft carrier with bunch of drone? Military cargo plane or bomber that act like mothership
Arsenal bird
The aircraft carrier itself can be a drone as well.
Not really. Cargo planes are slow and vulnerable, so unless you're in a completely landlocked region, it won't be able to get all that much closer than a carrier. And the carrier can store many times the amount of drones a cargo plane could.
I think I see it the same way I think they saw it after the end of World War II, if I recall correctly. Military planners thought there was no reason to have a conventional navy or army because the air force had just become so, so advanced, and because nuclear weapons still existed. Granted, in a conventional setting, drones are much more useful than nuclear weapons, but I'd still always lean on the side of caution when it comes to "we don't need X, Y, Z anymore because we have A now". Of course, I definitely agree that drones are insanely useful in modern warfare, but drones certainly don't nullify the need and/or use of conventional strategies and weapons systems, and I would assume that point is compounded more than most of what we call "modern warfare" is assymetrical and is government v nongovernmental faction (though two current conflicts serve as exceptions to that), rather than government v government, where, I at least, drones might be less useful against such well-armed, well-funded militaries.
As another commenter said: "In Ukraine, both sides of the conflict are actively using similar systems, especially Russia with its Lancet and Geranium drones. However, this did not abolish the classic Tanks, Artillery and Aircraft, but only complemented them on the battlefield." Maybe I'm already sucumbing to traditionalist mentality, despite not being all that old, but, in my own opinion based on what I know, drones are going to be another addition to military arsenals, but not a *replacement* for much of anything. The same went for a modernizing air force - it didn't replace anything.
That is extremely inciteful and very well done
Anyone who goes out of their way to say "we don't need X, Y, Z anymore because we have A now" are either 1) contractors or supporters or investors for "A" who of course want to hype up their product, 2) people from the branch of service or force that will use "A" and thus must not only hype up "A" but also slander the users of X, Y and Z (even from their own service) to get their funds, 3) people who have very limited, almost video-game-esque visions about war and think uber-units are all one needs.
@@ricktoconnor clearly this guy is just sucking up the words of mr sheethead here. It lacks insight. The difference? Drones are considered dispensable. Sure, they may only cost $5k to produce in materials, but thats ignoring the man hours for development and the operating costs, which it still has. So let's say $50k per drone (which is extremely low compared to actual estimates) - $50k * x over a long enough period is going to cost the same or more than just having a damn jet that can actually defend itself and come home reliably. There's a reason they fly reapers in hostile environments with no protections.. they're dispensable.
@@tonyvelasquez6776yapping go brrr💀🥸
I think the biggest thing is that to a degree, it further equalizes the relative power between global opponents.
It means for relatively low costs, you can give quality equipment to many forces. So long as you're not facing crushing air Supremacy, there is now quite a bit you can do to counter threats from superior forces. That's what the rise of cheap precision does.
Even for smaller and middle powers in a context of government V government, that too is true. The rise of autonomous systems and lower production costs associated with them means that they can afford to expand their air forces enough to contest the skies and not be immediately crushed by air superiority. Overall, it's a further democratization of the battlefield. Though likely still in favor of smaller, better equipped and technical forces, rather than very large forces.
As far as the current trend is going, it seems the future is dominated by a small core of very expensive systems that can achieve breakthroughs, aided by a vast number of very cheap autonomous systems meant to compliment them.
I suspect Aircraft Carriers will have a drone class carrier subclass in the future. Can you imagine a Ford class supercarrier that just has swarm drones as its armament? Each with a reloadable payload and a aircraft tower that serves as the drone controller? That would be terrifying.
Petition to call the sub-class the "Wasp Nest / Hive" class 😂
@@skepticalmagos_101
“The fifth wasp how has bees”
Why would someone build a single super carrier just to house swarm drones, if you can build 10 regular sized ships full of drones instead? The reason for the massive size of the carrier is the flightdeck, plane storage and the thousands of crewman needed to operate it. And by the way, there are also drone ships out there, so we might see a autonomous drone carrier at some day.
@@oO0Xenos0Oo you said it yourself, more size, the more drone storage and people to supply it etc.
I mean, with that logic, why build supercarriers at all anyway? Like why the ford class and not say, something smaller and say 10 of them. It's as much symbology and concentration of forces as anything else.
@@OniFeezbecause of the flight deck and aircraft storage and maintenance….
That's why we developed SHORAD systems. Stryker based 50 kW lasers that down a drone per second. Half a dozen of those on the battlefield and drones aren't a problem. We haven't quite deployed this yet, but we will soon; especially if for some reason the need becomes critical.
I heard it downed some of the Hothie drones already , unofficially of course.
Yeah, well until we get to 500kW and higher lasers, that are ground mobile, we still need massive amounts of 30mm+ proximity shells meeting the cheap drones, better and most importantly cheaper SAMs in a small form factor for short/medium range larger drones.
You have no idea what we really have do you. Bless your heart, the military is technologically ten years ahead of where you think we are. 8+ years in the USAF taught me that. I saw things 30 years ago that are still classified. And your obvious lack of understanding of directed energy being able to operate in different spectrums at much lower power to achieve the same end result proves that.
I think this is gonna make Ace Combat 7 closer to reality.... It's a cool concept though, but I still dream to pilot a fighter aircraft.... Even if it's a non combat sitiation
Plane type UAVs work only in conflict where one of the sides has no AA sistems
not necessarily though, we´ve seen it in the Russian-Ukraine War were several, different sized drones were used. For rxample the TB2
@@nelayo4894the TB2 got alot less effective once the Russians figured out that their air defenses only work when actually switched on.
But little $500 quad copters or even more so $50 or $100 quad copters cost often less then the shells fired by anti air guns to shoot them down.
True. And the Ukraine isn't using our advanced systems that can down a drone a second using lasers. (SHORAD) Get half a dozen of those on the battlefield and drones are no longer the problem.
@@OrdinaryDude you can still overwhelm them and there's other defenses against such systems. Like rolling airframe missiles, reflective coatings, range and weather.
Not to mention issues of IFF. Because everyone is using all the same drones, figuring out if that's your slide's drone or the enemy drone is made more difficult.
These small drones do not hold up against good old fashioned flak. That tech bro there says how it's not cost effective to use missiles against the cheap drones. But boy, have you seen how cheap it is to fill the sky with shrapnel? We figured this tech out in the 40s.
Bro ACE COMBAT lore is now becoming real
Autonomous drones delivering autonomous drones to forward positions with autonomous attack abilities. Only thing missing is self assembly, right?
Stop playing Ace Combat!
@@SroedingerCatYou can't make me!
@@SroedingerCat I never tried AC(Ace Combat) though, planning to, maybe after AC(Armored Core). With my A\C(Air Conditioner) turned on. ;))))))
@@azizithelethargic9229and you can do that if you dont have ac/dc electrisity
Cant * @nikolaideianov5092
What do you mean modern militaries dont make sense anymore? How is an aircraft carrier showing up at your door no longer a viable option?
It costs a billion dollars + for a warship (or much more for that) but a robot submarine that can go attack it costs far less.
@@FoundAndExplained Yeah but considering it could be hacked or jammed or just get stuck. It's still highly unlikely that every single military vehicle would be unmanned. Analogy could be done when ww2 ended US thought the only wars could be fought would be nuclear wars and no branches would be needed other than air force because that would be plane carrying nuke that turned out to be not true and we still have conventional warfare. But in the future We will see just a wide even more use of unmanned systems even more such as ground vehicles and even unmanned self propelled artillery systems to do shoot and scoot operations.
@@FoundAndExplaineddrones are very prone to jamming. We will see countries investing more in anti drone technology either through jammers or point/mobile anti air defense systems
@@Radialguywe don't use nukes as conventional weapons anymore
@@FoundAndExplained replace manned multipurpose combat planes aboard carriers with smaller multipurpose combat drones, and the carriers have become even deadlier now. no more worry about pilot deaths mid-flight, and so long as the drones are significantly cheaper than manned counterparts, there's less worry about them falling to AA fire or jamming (though commanders would still love it if the drones don't die, of course)
Title: if Apple was a deffense company
My mind: Apple tank 15 pro max, barrel and fuel tank sold seperately
If Apple was a defense company, the drones would not be able to rearm, operators would need to send them to the factory or buy a new one.😂
I'm concerned who these guys sell their drones to, do we have some clients?
the endless swarms pf drones from BO2 is getting closer and closer than before
This just makes me wish I lived back in the 60s-2000s, back when technology and cars were interesting and engineering marvels. These days, it's all just efficiency and money, at the expense of innovation, creativity and engineering awe. It sucks.
It’s always been about efficiency and money. Innovation and creativity was always just a byproduct.
@@kolinmartz Perhaps. However, I'd like to point out engineering marvels like the Bugatti Veyron, among others, with which Volkswagen lost 4 million on each sale. This is the sort of stuff we will no longer see, because of the extraneous restrictions pit on modern engineering, and the constant drive for efficiency and cost savings at every corner.
It's because the *small hat bankers* in charge of the US do not care about scientific development. They only care about income and efficiency.
This gonna turn into the final war
The First Final War!
So let me get this straight, they've made deals with Turkish manufacturers like Bayraktar, who's models they are basically coying, and they're the ones making huge leaps in defense ?
This channel is probably got money from arabs and also probably Türkophobic so thats explains it.
I really liked this video, hope you make more videos like this with interviews from air shows and conferences.
In Ukraine, both sides of the conflict are actively using similar systems, especially Russia with its Lancet and Geranium drones. However, this did not abolish the classic Tanks, Artillery and Aircraft, but only complemented them on the battlefield.
That's written like a statement from War Thunder on the introduction of drones to the game.
@@MrPlussesdrones made being in a tank obnoxious
@@SilverStarHeggisist
The marketing departments at tank manufactures around the world must be a sad work environment.
@@MrPlusses probably not, they probably instead are looking at ways to counter drones as well as incorporate drones.
For instance the Autel Evo Max 4T could be launched from a tank to find targets miles away and then lazing the target tell the tank crew exactly where on the map the target was. Allowing the tank to plan a flanking maneuver to fire at from the side.
As a bonus the tank can forgo using itself own laser range finder preventing the enemy from knowing where the tank is targeting them from. Using the coordinates given by the drone and the enemy is now looking in the opposite direction the drone lased from.
@@SilverStarHeggisist
What you described doesn't need to be a tank. A few sure, but all that armour goes to waste sitting as a command/control car.
The absolute fear of a tank is gone. The fear is still there situationally but nothing they update can truly bring back that absolute fear.
When it comes to combat drones, Baykar from Turkey is far more battle proven
All of the products from this Dubai firm are direct copies from Baykar.
The development of those new weapons aim to dig the enemies grave, but it probably is the entire human race grave.
Yeah, just think about what comes down the line. Super small advanced swarm drones, that are produced in the millions and will hunt anybody down like a bee swarm when let loose.
More robots less people working. Rich richer. The Poor with no job
As these autonomous and low cost systems become more and more prevalent and available, I wonder if this will lead to more and more wars or if it will make wars "obsolete" where there is no real advantage or cost (other than lower financial ones - less and less HUMAN cost) to attack and defense systems. Will automatons fighting each other just become the equivalent of a video game simulation? Seems like the original Star Trek and Twilight Zone explored a lot of these ideas and moral conflicts!
Until I release autonomous systems in your civilian areas at home. 🥱🥱
I think it's going to make it easier to start wars because of the low costs.
I was waiting for a video about modern drones 👌🏼🔥
Aren’t there plenty of movies, plenty of books, and plenty of games out there telling us that we shouldn’t make AIreplace humans, when will people listen? The enemy could literally just EMP all the drones, and those drones are toast. And don’t say that they can’t be hacked, anything can be hacked if you try hard enough.
I mean I've seen a lot movies where some pilots are getting end up killed by alien drones.
Great video. I like that this video had a lot less of that heavy-handed artificial camera shake your videos normally have. I did not have to pause it or look the other way.
Very intersting and well done as always!
Looks like Rheinmetall will soon have many new customers for its Skynex and Mantis systems.
War is abouta be like a gta V online lobby if they go to space. Orbital connons
Making drones autonomous seems like a horrible idea. And i'm not talking about it going skynet or anything. I am concerned about how taking away the human element will just result in highly destructive wars that are decided entirely by production capacity.
Or worse a return to WW2 esc bomber raids.
As opposed to... every war in human history?
@@johnroutledge9220 Many wars have been lost because a nation lost the will to fight. Human soldiers can get disgruntled and lose the will to fight, drones do not. Not to mention they'd have no issue killing the citizens of their own nation if a tyranical government wanted them to unlike human soldiers.
This shows how directed energy weapons will be needed for ships. It removes the problem of limited ammunition and are accurate. I imagine that a ship is currently the only machines with enough size anf power to wield one. Trucks etc are too small. The only other place would on land as a fixed station. Useful for for a power station.
EMP weapons making an epic return soon
bruh counter and protectiobs from emp exist.
it take as little as a underground concrette barrier or something as ridicolous as a thick foil paper cover to dampen and negate EMP aswell plus automatized restart system.
Excellent Video 💯
Conventional aircraft, tanks and ships will always have a place, be it just a TAC/ FCC units that survey the battlefield and provide data to their drone swarm or for fast intercept and interdiction. Yes, as the war in Ukraine shows drones play a big role in modern warfare, but I don't see them take over every role.
Great video, I liked it a lot
I remember when fighter jets carried missiles, now is sort of the other way around it
There's literally an entire game explaining why drones shouldn't replace human pilots.
I was wondering why there was no sponsor message... then it was revealed that the whole video was pretty much a promotional piece, lol. Was an interesting and informative watch though.
From the anti-drone capabilities (both electromagnetic, guns, and smart munitions from grenade launchers), I think that infantry will become almost a hard counter to drones much like they are against vehicles. Unlike with anti-armor capabilities for infantry, though, it will be cheaper and easier to equip more troops with anti-drone capabilities, which is also fitting due to the numbers drones can be deployed in, so you won't need specific squads designated for the role with other squads having only a small capability to handle it themselves like you do with anti-tank weapons.
Infantry are amazing. They can counter anything with the right equipment and can hold territory on the cheap.
Just read more sc-fi books .... Any way we are at stage when 500$(?) drone destroy tank that cost many milions ...thewore AT fire and forget.... handheld was needed (200k?)... We are not at stage when autonomus swarm of drones and jammers are in space ... But we will.. .. Now jamming is almost not visible on front.. And even if there will be ...sides will use giroscope internal navigation ...to lock and fly to target position when operator lost connection at last 200m (?)
What is blud yapping about
A lot of these technologies are already being used in Ukraine
Correct! This is the future. We even spoke about Ukraine in the full interview that you can watch here: czcams.com/video/hdnt-A2dptM/video.html
Essentially Ukraine is a war that is from ww1 with trenches but then suddenly with drones as well!
Ukraine is the best testing ground for prototype and ideas
@@jollygreen4662 💡That's all Ukraine is-is a testing ground for weapons💥😂 And they actually think that America cares about them😳
A handful of cheap Amazon drones and some RPG warheads and i can have my own drone swarm.
I'm curious as who they are marketing to ... the legacy defense contractors, while bloated, usually sell to NATO or US aligned countries.
They are targeting smaller sized militarys, where outdated and cost heavy equipment can be quickly replaced with ad-hoc solutions. Especially those that neighbor countries with a way bigger standing army.
What Animation editor you use on this, i got some work and can't figure out one to work out well for me
This perhaps is gonna do the deed
so what happens when the big ones stop producing armored vehicles, planes and ships? what will be the purpose of drones? right now drones are used to destroy these big expensive machines. how will a war be won when its only drone vs drone?
Yo this video goes hard af
The last defence system humans developed wasnt the land or navy but it was air defences and now the first automated one will be the air force 😅😅
Well, I’ve been wanting to go into the USAF for a pretty long time now, haven’t been able to enlist yet as I’m not old enough , guess my job is going to be replaced by a flying rusty bucket of bolts. No more honor to me or my family.
Eh, I wouldn't get too disappointed, one, the Chair Force will still need a crap ton of people to fly and maintain those drones, and two, as laser technology improves, (and we start getting our crap together with 30/40/50mm SHORAD systems), cheap drones won't make that much of an impact as they do right now. 😁
I'm excited, can I buy a weapons platform drone from Edge?
Drones are awesome , but modern conflict showed how weak they are to signal jamming , regular man piloted canned be jammed to the point where they are useless
when you see sci-fi movies the pilots get killed by alien drones
drones while cheaper are nowhere close to replacing manned aircraft simply because drones can be disabled far easier then an f-18 with a guided bomb they just simply work well with the traditional tanks artillery and air forces like in Ukraine. and I say disabled easier because Raytheon has developed a new portable anti drone laser to put on The back of vehicles and also developed a microwave gun that can fry their electronics now try taking out a super sonic f-15 flying at a low altitude like a drone using an AA gun or stinger and see how much harder it is.
i am of the opinion that uav and uac won't entirely replace the manned units but will augment the abilities of a military by using the benefits of both. a computer or remote controlled plane won't compete with a manned plane in a head to head. but this video talked well about what the unmanned units can be very good for. ac130 gunship could be replaced by an unmanned one that can loiter around a location for an entire day and the crew fatigue is a non-issue.
It’s only a matter of time before we eventually see a carrier that has multiple drones to compliment the number of actual manned aircraft. The carriers will house the drone pilots but you will always need manned craft. The gap between manned and AI supported craft will get smaller with the final decision to attack or bomb resting in the hands of human. I’m not trying to sound naive as that last prediction may also change.
Totally agree, even if it's only 1 manned aircraft per 10 or more drones, there will still need to be a human in the loop.
Communications back to the carrier where the drone operators sit can be jammed, and for certain missions you just need a human to be there to make decisions and push the button.
Drones aren't going to replace jets and pilots or even tanks. There will always be a counter to them.
Cool story bruh.
Waiting 🎉🎉🎉 from the Philippines
Please make a vedio on su 27.
If these will be the future of warfare, will the normal fighter jets be retired and be replaced by these drones? The drones look ugly tbh.
drones used supposed to be stealthy and invisible radar and no risking pilots deaths
Tell me Skynet is arriving without telling me
@FoundAndExplained would you also looks at anduril who are also doing this type of systems
LoL, These are clones of much more successful drones like Bayraktar TB2, Kızılelma And AeroVironment Switchblade.
Is there c5 galaxy replacement in planning?
It’s incredible and scary watching the video games we’ve played become reality. We truly live in an age of advanced warfare now
4:32 definitely got that concept from Starship Troopers.... would you like to know more?
I wouldn't say so that it will *already* be the end of manned military machines, there are still hundreds of other thing that unmanned drones cannot do compared to manned vehicles, like the B-52, C-130, C-17, and C-5, you'll notice that unmanned crafts cannot access large transport aircraft capabilities. But the B-2 is gonna be replaced with the unmanned B-21 Raider. But both are not big enough to have the same capacity of the mentioned crafts. Soooo, it will be a long time before militaries find a way to replace their transport aircrafts, I mean c'mon! The C-130 and B-52s are almost 2/3 of a hundred years old! (Probably.) Because they are very superior at certain points of time, like the Vietnam war, the B-52s are literally bombarding Vietnam. And it will be a long time before similar sized unmanned aircrafts have Similar events.
But no hates on Unmanned drones...
The B-21 is not unmanned
@@chayforster5138 It can do both Manned and Unmanned operations.
under an hour les go🔥🔥🔥🔥
Considering even city police forces are equipped with anti drone jammer guns that will bring them down it will take like a year for any heavily modernized military power to develop cheap anti drone tech. Big drones will be fried by lasers, small drones will be fried by CWIS, lasers, or drone jammers. Considering how much the US is putting into laser tech, anti air missiles could easily become a thing of the past.
It's so reassuring that the same approach that constantly giving us unfinished software from operating systems and videogames to cars that tends to be patched for years in order to be reliable while some products like full self-driving are selling on promises that can never be fulfilled with current hardware in Tesla cars is now being applied to autonomous killing machines where the fact that product is being rushed as much as possible as is common with tech companies, and inability to hack these machines because they are autonomous is being described as some kind of advantage we should cheer for whatever reason...
Also, who are these defense tech start-up companies targeting with their propaganda by proclaiming they cannot be hacked because they are autonomous when the ability to change targets in flight by the operator is a common feature even on cruise missiles like Tomahawk when you can hardly find a military that would want to operate an autonomous system they cannot control once it leaves launch site which means they are susceptible to hacking regardless if they are or aren't autonomous?
Seriously, how stupid must the target audience be to see such statements as being positive after experiences with this approach from a civilian sector that are now being applied even to killing machines procured and operated by people with questionable morals that will happily pass unfinished products like F-35 into service for public image/business reasons???
When F&A became a UAE drone promotor. Hey, I think it's a nice oppertunity for you, that's perfectly fine, it's your platform after all and it's not all BS, just that boots on the ground will - for now and coming 20 years at least will not be swapped out for drones or any single use explosives.
Reach-S is just a Bayraktar TB-2 copy
Likewise, Jeniah is a Bayraktar "Kızılelma" copy
Then Steve Jobs would have had a palladium reactor in his chest 😂
You forgot to click the "contains sponsored ad" option on this video. Also please lead with disclosing sponsorship for transparency and don't just mention it in passing at the end, thanks.
So someone will probably build a giant flying aircraft carrier that can carry lots of drones
I know what we can name it
With today's off-the-shelf parts, I can make a drone that can attack a target it recognizes from training data, and dive for it kamikaze style.
I can use a raspberry pi 5 or Jetson Ai module and OpenCV API for target recognition and locking.
You want night operations? Attach a FLIR camera instead of an IR camera.
Navigation done by PIXHAWK Ardupilot flight controller and chose from many open source routing management software. All for under $1000
If I can do it, they can do it.
Imagine having a million of these for only $1 Billion?
9:34 .... ah, it all makes sense now.
Lol that explains why there was all fluff and no pushback
The chairman of the edge group 😏😏
Ace Combat 7 is becoming real…
War is applied economics. The most efficient system will always win. The future is autonomous.
The original concept of the Boeing 777, back in the late 70s, had it as a trijet, like the DC-10 and L-1011. How's that for a topic?
The world is moving closer to the cyberpunk 2077 dystopia where megacorporations control wars
I have two words : phantom works
Oh shit Skell Techs real now
Sounds like the guy who built titanic submersible. Off shelf & fast has its place but military advanced secret high tech does too
Just cause the big industries haven't doesn't mean they can't
US task force 59 tests a lot of autonomous naval drones off the coast of UAE
Interesting. It's like the armed forces will be in need for more drones.
Terminator reference 🤣
Satellite noletworks and constilatipns become more and more important. Also each side of a conflict having uncontested space space* (space space? Like airspace?) Becomes more and more important. This might lead to hostile actions in orbit and end with the kardoshov effect (spelling help on that pls).
Basicly the more autonomous vehicles you add the more communications technology you need and the more likely it is we get trapped on earth because of stupid wars.
This is how Skynet is made 💀💀💀
A 10 minute advert for a defense contractor from a nation of despots? I hope they paid you well.
For a science an technology channel you sure have a lot of nerve uploading a 10-minute advertisement.
Arab Tony stark is scary
Black ops 2
Takes place in 2025
Is all about drone warfare
Irl
2024
Drone warfare is starting to become much more popular
"A billion dollars is chump change. What does a billion buy anyway today? It doesn't even buy a million dollars" - Yusuf Amir
8 minutes in and i was still wondering when the half assed ad-read stops. Turns out it dosn´t :/ I know sponsors are needed but that was just sad......