Terrifying Discovery in the Sahara Desert
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 05. 2024
- Terrifying Discovery in the Sahara Desert
► Subscribe: goo.gl/r5jd1F
The Sahara is the largest hot desert on Earth. 8.6 million square kilometers or 3.3 million square miles of sand dunes and rocks. This is about the size of the U.S., except for the few eastern states - California, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington, buried under the sand.
At first sight, this huge kingdom of sand where the surface can heat up to 80° Celsius and the average rainfall is only about 76 millimeters per year isn’t that interesting. And yet, the Sahara is as full of secrets and mysteries as its night sky is full of bright stars. And scientists still struggle to solve many of them…
We are on social media:
destinymediaa
destiny.media.yt
The Destiny voice:
www.TomsVoiceovers.co.uk
![Amazing SAHARA: Tassili n'Ajjer, Algeria [Amazing Places 4K]](/img/n.gif)
10,000 years ago the Sahara used to be Tropical to subtropical. Then something happened. I've heard it was because of a minor shift in the Earth's axis.
It was due to a nuclear war my friend. They will never tell you this!
read up on it myself looks like our poles completely shifted. north becoming south and so on.
The water veins could have become misaligned most definitely,💯💯💯like fresh water springs, they spring up from water veins 💯deep within thee earth. 😱😱😱😱😱😱
@@crackshotscreenprinting wrong. 🍉🥭🍍🥩🥦🍠You must unlearn what you’ve been taught and relearn with discernment and to be free from outer encouragements and opinions lest you chase your tail like a dog into oblivion. 💯
5,000**
Lightening strikes on sand create glass, this should have been the first thing ruled out before calling glass mysterious.
How often does lightning happen in the Sahara?
@@DodgeThis The Sahara has not always been desert, and yes lightening strikes do happen there today.
There's to much glass for it to be lightening. It would have to strike the same place millions of times
@@staybizzie Did you make that up yourself or did you read some lunatics blog? If there was an small area that had been hit by lightening there would be entire mountains of glass. Or you wouldn't have sand dunes, you would have glass marble dunes. Try using a little Critical Thinking, I know it can be hard at first, but learning how to think is liberating.
@doug randall No it was just the facts presented in this video and others (not my first time on this topic) also my knowledge on lightening.
For hundreds of tons of glass stretched over 13 miles? The lightening would have to be continously striking that area and there's not that many storms and if it was lightening it be glass everywhere and not limited to that place and one time period. So yeah I'm critically thinking. Are you?
I love how aliens and war are never far from being called in as an explanation to finding old glass on planets like mars and earth
Is more interesting and less Dreadful then a comet air bursting
What are you trying to say exactly?
Surely you can find a less confusing way you make ur point ?
Are you saying they should be implying that intergalactic wars are the source of the ancient glass ?
@@pocohax6552 My proposal is that people are always making giant leaps when trying to explain something. And in youtube it is more profitable than making safe assumptions. "Pareidolia is the tendency for perception to impose a meaningful interpretation on a nebulous stimulus, usually visual, so that one sees an object, pattern, or meaning where there is none."
@@pocohax6552 it was satirical in nature... the OP is pointing out that the 'intergalactic war' reasoning is the first thing the media goes to, because ratings.
@@reraijotphimai9579 can you please rewrite that because I can't understand it
Those people might be ancient, but they were not dumb. They knew how to do such complex stuff because they have time. They kept records and kept improving it day by day. After 1000 years or so, i bet they had a good grasp of few things.
Yep and people now days worry about tik tok and what celebrities are wearing.
imagine if most of actually tried to further ourselves... we'd probably already have unlimited power, colonized mars,ect.
@@jasonjones4891 why we need to colonise Mars when we can't stop competing for military power which is destroying earth? Pritoties first, stop genocide and wars
@@Jay-ew8in They most likely worried what make gods angry because someone fell ill or there wasn't enough rain. So different times but generally the same thing.
@@Jay-ew8in I think that gossiping and such goes for the average folks of all times. If you wanna compare the ancient knowledgeable people to today, at least do so with today's smart folk, or you'd be comparing apples with oranges.
0:13 California is on the *WEST* Coast of the United States. Not an Eastern state by any means. Same goes for Oregon, Washington and Nevada.
A simple mistake
Epic fail unsubscribed and reported done with this nonsense
Some might say
@R S what’s your question?
They did look like they’re in the eastern US when I saw them from space. It’s all perspective.
Libyan glass: no need to mis-inform folks its just years lightning strikes the sand. I can say that I don't appreciate it when you go above and beyond to makes things mysterious for no reason.
Your viewers are not idiots.
why is it only located in a small area of the sahara and not all over it and all over other deserts in the world.
Judging by the people unironically talking about Atlantis and aliens, I can say that the viewers are indeed idiots.
Please stop with the sensationalism in the video titles! 🙏🏼
It's such a shame when you want your channel to be grounded in the scientific method and seem trustworthy.
I'm guessing your goal is not to look like a gossip tabloid?
The Philadelphia Inquirerer of science
It's a shame but it is what it is due to if he didn't have those titles/thumbnails he probably wouldn't get half the views, even though the info is still good.
@@JblazeTK what’s good ? He just rambled about it like if we don’t already know what it is
@@JblazeTK Richat Structure, or the "Eye of the Sahara," in northwestern Mauritania. The circular geologic feature is thought to be caused by an uplifted dome-geologists would classify it as a domed anticline-that has been eroded to expose the originally flat rock layers.
"..when you want your channel to be grounded in the scientific method..." Hahaha. I see no evidence at all for this channel aspiring to be based on serious science. There are others out there that qualify for such a thing but this one is baloney. It's all about sensationalism (look at the title) and getting clicks. Pass.
Calling an "Antlantologist" a Scientist who searches for Atlantis made me laugh so hard my stomach hurt.
Kinda funny. But remember this. Everyone made fun of Troyologists until the city of Troy was actually found.
@@livetotell100 no it wasn't. It's a ruin that happened to be where ppl expected Troy to be. The illyad is nothing more or less than an epic because ancient Greeks had a hard-on for epics and needed one to explain their presence there.
Ufologists was equally as gut busting, utterly ridiculous.
@@myowngenesis So, the City of Troy💀💀
Scientists have been proven to be incorrect on many occasions. A scientist is merely one who tries to prove the veracity of theories, even Einstein has been wrong as is proven today.
How exactly...is this terrifying???
Like yes right??...
Because it contradicts the premise of linear progress and assumed level of 'intelligence'...does it make sense to postmodern people that there was a working battery , lightbulb, and an energy generator and that the ancients knew about magnetic fields and how to create them? This is considered relatively recent premises...
So glad I read the comments before investing time
For the same reason that everything on cnn is "breaking news" 😂
@@tigerspirit1917 let’s go Brandon!
Richat Structure, or the "Eye of the Sahara," in northwestern Mauritania. The circular geologic feature is thought to be caused by an uplifted dome-geologists would classify it as a domed anticline-that has been eroded to expose the originally flat rock layers.
Then how come there's city grid all over it? How come clear city grid covers the mountains, north of the "Richat Structure". The geological record CLEARLY reveals cities being devastated by fire and water.
Nope it an ophanim!
@@williamreed7099 don’t tell me, tell NASA
If this richat structure is this interesting, why then has there never an actual onsite picture or video? Why is it the all videos in CZcams only use the image from space and not a single picture taken from the ground? Man can surely easily find its exact location even in the vast Sahara desert
@@tatsdgreat8886 because you wouldn’t see the circles if you’re ground level
I think there is an entire secret human history of which we know nothing.
I'll bet there are many long forgotten cities in that desert.
Probably a few but Richat is definitely not Atlantis.
@@Gamerock82 my grandad is very old and he said he lived in Atlantis which is where this eye is located. So you're wrong
@@TheSuperBoyProject your grandpa must be 80 at most or 100 if he's lucky but Atlantis got lost hundreds of years ago .... Before plato, who existed like 2,268 from Now ... ( estimate)
what i love about this kind of videos, it feeds my brain with unlimited ideas, thoughts,, questions and etc.
best 10 min of my entire day.
Haha damn
This is why I love this channel, I love letting my imagination run wild involving aliens and Atlantis, but I appreciate science more. This channel showing both sides makes it so much more interesting.
Lol I thought this was a science channel
Destiny is an inspiration... Sahara Desert has so many things to discover in it. Scientists are tirelessly working everyday. I recently covered a topic on Sahara desert. Good video, Destiny !
There were never a tribe of people over 2 meters tall...
The Sahara desert is the result of destruction and the ruin of a prosperous civilization. Thanks to Hot warfare and biochemical warfare. Similar to how the Inca empire fell.
This stuff is absurd. you ever think solon saw the structure (which is natural) and imagined it as an island and made up a story...
@@realityvanguard2052 the lack of evidence is not an evidence, the idea can be entertained
Is it really so hard to convey the latest scientific data and theories correctly, or is this channel _intentionally_ getting it wrong (almost?) every single time it says something about it?
Judging by the ridiculous depiction (9:32) of what a 2 meter tall person looks like, compared to someone of average hight (1,80m), namely almost twice as tall, I suspect the latter is the case.
Another possibility is that the content creator(s?) of _"Destiny'_ calculated that 180cm plus 180cm equals 200cm.
Whatever the agenda of its creators, it's best to avoid the _Destiny_ channel when looking for reliable (scientific) information.
Doesn't lightening striking sand make "glass" ? Speaking of the scattered glass specifically here,
I saw it in a modern film called "Sweet home Alabama" a scene
At the beach.
It was rather pointy glass created.
In the desert, Libya, the jagged edges could have been worn smooth with erosion over millenia.
No lighting striking the sand wouldn’t of caused it to melt into glass, it’s only happen under high amount of pressure and heat, such as point of impact of nuclear or hydrogen warhead
@@Dino_Hunter_420 You do know that Lightning is hotter than the surface of the sun? Lightning strikes on sand creating glass is a well recorded fact.
@@HORRIOR1 but it wasn’t the lightning and lightning don’t have enough properties to turn sand into a glass, only a meteor or nuke can it needs enough pressure & heat which lightning lack the impact pressure
Lighting striking sand does in fact make glass, often times towers of glass in fact! They're called fulgurites and they can stretch several feet into the air in odd directions, if these were to fall apart and erode smooth after many years, it could explain it
They used lightning rods to focus and concentrate the energy of the bolt. Just like a welding rod. Hence glass.
What was so terryfing about this findings?
Sensatie text om ons te laten kijken
Als iets van heel ver weg op aarde komt vallen moet het tog verbrand zijn en of gesmolten als boter
at 06:46 you said " hundred thousand " but there was written " ten thousand " correction
@@jamalalf but what would the "Atlantologists" say?! Please Destiny, call pseudoscience what it really is and stop making tinfoil hats seem like real scientists. Stop calling them "Ufo-logists" & "Atlantologists". Don't encourage them. We need to help them join the rest of us in reality.
@@jamalalf No it wasn’t!
@@ragetobe I believe there are books write about it and many more ancient civilizations in the library of alexandria
They also named off the eastern states, such as California, et. al. 🤷♂️
Enjoyed a lot ! Keep up the good work 👍
WHAT’S THIS?
A misleading thumbnail that makes me rethink subscribing. That’s what it is.
Outstanding stories folks...thanks for this serie..special thanks to the narrator himself.
Interesting - BUT, NOT terrifying as the title indicates!!!
Whats terrifying is that the supposedly most intelligent creatures ( us ) on the planet are engrossed in it.
I am terrified
Plato never saw Atlantis. Why is everyone going by his description? He heard about Atlantis while in Alexandria, and the person he heard it from probably heard it from someone else and so on…
11 minutes into the video, nothing 'terrifying ' yet...
Shit I think a meteor colliding with earth is pretty scary.
@@ralphpierre9122 a meteor that crashed thousands of years ago isn’t though.
id be interested in what that glass' composition is, its plausible thats scattered about like that because of a meteorite that was composed of silica quartz exploded upon entry to our atmosphere, scattering the then molten or partially molten glass across the desert.
it could also potentially be part of material that was ejected when the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs hit reentering atmosphere... granted that ones really unlikely.
It's composed of Saharan sand. It was almost certainly made an airburst bolide. It's hilarious when the compare it to atomic bomb glass. As someone who owns pieces of both trinitite (glass form the trinity bomb test) and Libyan desert glass they are nothing alike.
Well guess harder
Plasma and lightning during magnetic pole shifts. Hits sand, causes glass.
I love how I'm sitting here ignoring my phone when this video randomly starts playing FOR NO REASON.
Ah yes... another "terrifying" discovery that doesn't terrify anyone
So terrifying in fact, that I may sleep better tonight than before I knew.
Yer name ? hahaha !
can you please stop using these disturbing thumbnails for a moment i thought i am living on ego the living planet
There are 1000 year old maps that show the Sahara had a lot of rivers
There’s a book called “maps of the ancient sea kings” it says that old maps got their information from even older maps. Interestingly some of those older maps show Antarctica without ice.
@@petersinclair9018 nice, thank you
Richat Structure
The Richat Structure is regarded by geologists as a highly symmetrical and deeply eroded geologic dome. It was first described in the 1930s to 1940s, as Richât Crater or Richât buttonhole (boutonnière du Richât). Richard-Molard (1948) considered it to be the result of a laccolithic thrust.[7] A geological expedition to Mauritania led by Théodore Monod in 1952 recorded four "crateriform or circular irregularities" (accidents cratériformes ou circulaires) in the area, Er Richât, Aouelloul (south of Chinguetti), Temimichat-Ghallaman and Tenoumer.[8] Origin of Er Richât as an impact structure (as is clearly the case with the other three) was briefly considered, but closer study in the 1950s to 1960s suggested that it was formed by terrestrial processes. After extensive field and laboratory studies in the 1960s, no credible evidence has been found for shock metamorphism or any type of deformation indicative of a hypervelocity extraterrestrial impact.[9] While coesite, an indicator of shock metamorphism, had initially been reported as being present in rock samples collected from the Richat Structure, further analysis of rock samples concluded that barite had been misidentified as coesite.[10]
Work on dating the structure was done in the 1990s.[11] Renewed study of the formation of the structure by Matton et al. (2005) and Matton (2008) confirmed the conclusion that it is not an impact structure. The circular distribution of ridges and valleys is explained as the formation of cuestas by the differential erosion of alternating hard and soft rock layers uplifted as a dome by an underlying alkaline igneous complex of Cretaceous age.[12]
A 2011 multianalytical study on the Richat megabreccias concluded that carbonates within the silica-rich megabreccias were created by low-temperature hydrothermal waters, and that the structure requires special protection and further investigation of its origin.[13]
The Richat Structure is the location of exceptional accumulations of Acheulean artifacts which are stone hand axes associated with Homo erectus and derived species.
Lybian Glass
Your being confusing & contradictory referring to Libyan glass as both Quartz & Glass. These are not at all the same substance. Glass has an amorphous molecular structure while Quartz has a (tectosilicate SiO2) crystalline molecular structure.
Which is it? Yes, I know the answer, do you?
I mean, the dude made a video on the Eye of Sahara, after youtube literally being filled with videos and essay's about in the past years..i think he's kinda late to the party to be wrong on top :D..shame
Amazing explanation..👏👏
All your videos are so informative. 😎👍
Not sure a human 2 meters tall (6'4") would be called a giant and must have missed the "terrifying" part.
I know I'm being picky, but 2 meters = 6'8" not 6'4". Still not a giant, but intimidating if you are 5'-0".
Considering the rest of humans around that time were just under 5 ft, those are giants. Average humans were 4”9 to 4”10 around that time.
@@davidbriggs6086 I know I'm being picky, but 2 meters = 6'7", not 6'8".
So the giant tribe in prehistoric comic is not really fictional at all
Yo Klaas Bas;. Well played sir, well played.
So interesting. I love learning new information like this .
Me too😊❤️
But was it terrifying?
Did you guys not already uploaded this video? I remember watching it. 🤔🤔
There was a Sci-Show video on it, you may be thinking of that
a lot of other famous channels did the very same video with the same thumbnail idea just look up " what's under the Sahara desert" and you'll find like 10 or so of these
What sound effects do you guys use on your text really need to know.
If there was a pole shift that caused the majority of Africa to dry up, how can the henge be aligned to the stars if the axis shifted?
Aliens having nuclear conflicts 😂
Richat Structure, or the "Eye of the Sahara," in northwestern Mauritania, a country where the myth of atlas came from and beside the atlantik and below the atlas mountains, just this facts are fascinating. but beside these facts, the stones have three colors, there is an old map where Atlantis is marked where the richard structure is and there are huge salt seas, a prove that there was ocean many years ago.
The thumbnail is tooo tempting good work
Wow, the Sahara Desert still leaves a lot of questions that cannot be answered yet. Although at first glance it seems that there is nothing interesting in it except sand, cacti, mountains, and sand. I hope that in the future people will still get to the truth, although there is little chance of it. For example, where did those giants go or where did that glass come from. I'd like to know.
Its near Atlas mountains ...has more than 30 identifying features that make it the best option for Atlantis anywhere know .
atlantis was found in cadiz in southern spain. All of this is out of date
@@Teambr00klyn no it wasn't .....because this is Atlantis .fits almost all criteria.And is by far the most likely place on earth .
@@o-redstoothbrush7916 you're not smart enough to understand my comment
@@Teambr00klyn My intellectual vanity is not in question,furthermore your verbiage is grossly inadequate to throw stones. And I suggest maybe you do a little bit more research.
@@Teambr00klyn also there is a clear description of the location of Atlantis. It can't lie far from the pillars of Hercules. In history there are two. One off of the Strait of Gibraltar, and a lesser-known pillars of Hercules. The pillars of Hercules are also not far from the Atlas Mountains named after King Atlas also known as the first king of Atlantis. There are many things from the concentric rings, the fact the Sahara was much wetter at the end of the younger dryas, the fact that there is signs of water erosion around the structure showing that the inner parts of the concentric rings where once filled with water. And there are 30 more identifying features. More than any other known spot on the planet. And it is also the only known like structure that is visibly seen on satellite imagery anywhere in the world. It looks even more interesting when applying lidar technology.
This is why I like to believe that ancient cultures were advanced in their own way. Just because now we indicate advancement with technology doesn't necessarily mean this was the case before. We need to stop comparing our modern world of advanced understanding to what was possibly were before, then we might answer some questions.
I’ve always thought this as well with how the pyramids were built they probably didn’t even record most of the tools they used or they got lost🤷🏽♂️
It’s Atlantis. I’ve been to the Richat Structure in 2018, and you can not tell me it’s anything other than Atlantis. The way the mountains behind it are described by philosophers and writers, the sizes of the rings, it’s just all so perfect. The Younger Dryas impact theory explains how cities like Atlantis, places like Gobekli Tepe, even the ancient Egyptians all were taken out thousands of years ago and wiped out all advanced civilizations. Look at how far we have come over the last 200 years. You mean to tell me that it couldn’t have been duplicated thousands of years ago and then wiped out by cataclysmic events?
If you've been then you know it smells like sulphur and has zero ancient sites on it. Bhedowin buildings 300 years old at the oldest. No pottery, no agricultural evidence, soil that straight up couldn't sustain farming no matter how much water because of the volcanic heat that would have been there. It's a volcano that is ingrown and bubbled up but the upper earth was stretchy enough to hold the magma force and become a bubble that then collapsed.
But do you remember the tar fields with the bubbling ground in land before time? The lush forest gave way to natural tar fields?
That's what the richat structure was before the underground volcano blew causing the shape we see now.
If it existed it's most likely in the now lost doggerland.
But I believe it's far more logical that earthling from earth is synonymous with Atlantan from Atlantis. The flood is globally agreed on. Aboriginal languages in new Zealand, rapanui, reunion island, Hawaii and several more in south America share many of the same words for the same things. All these island places have similar languages and much of the land around them was above the sea before the geologically proven global flood... Weird.
Atlantis= Earth itself. The entire globe is Atlantis. The capital city might have been what Plato was talking about but maybe he just couldn't conceptualize a global flood and thought the translation must have been wrong.
@@aftersexhighfiveswooah cool comment!! Ty
Atlantis was an island
Truly,how do you know its Atlantis? You only think you know and that don't mean nothing. Besides, Atlantis has not been discovered yet, just a few boneheads that think they have and that too don't mean nothing
@@Jay-pj5tg its not a wooah? cool comment. Its a stupid thing to write. Wake Up to yourself
If the Eye of the Sahara, is widely thought to be the product of erosion, how do they explain the nearly perfect, concentric rings that comprise the structure? Erosion could not, therefore, be a viable explanation for such a feature.
I vaguely remember something to the effect that it's also surrounded by flats containing large quantities of sea salt. Possibly supporting the claim that it was at least connected to the ocean. I could be wrong in my memory though.
The Richat Structure is regarded by geologists as a highly symmetrical and deeply eroded geologic dome. The wikipedia article is actually quite good.
Atlantis was in Spain.
And a volcano older than 10.000 years can also make glass.
So sure?
Nice explanation about sahara
SCIENTISTS claimed on the Discovery Channel that lightning strikes is the cause of the Sand Glass
Thanks. It seemed pretty obvious that lightening was a strong possibility. Unsubscribing.
Also the "glass" they mention, isn't glass. It's quartz crystals. West coast of US is east coast for some reason.
Fantastic video
Enjoyed the video but what was the 'terrifying' discovery?
Great Video !!!.
Excavating graves is just wrong.
Egypt is the first example that I have heard about and now this...
omg!!! I started laughing so hard I farted when homeboy said ufo thumper aren't scientists.....
Could Atlantis just be a story Plato wrote?
First time I've ever heard the Pacific states referred to as "eastern", especially since the are on the West coast...
This is better than history channel. Much more logical and real
As a professional salesman, I can verify this is aliens
Those few eastern states, California, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. You need to turn your compass 180 degrees.
Ever cast molten metal? When it cools and solidifies, it forms concentric circles. I believe these were put to good use as marine barriers to form a unique harbor and city-state. The entire region is like India in that it pushed into Africa and closed the channel to the east and then rose upward. All geologic processes. The Atlas Mountains are to the north just like Plato relates.
There are a lot of stuff under the Sahara!!
And the “terrifying” part is...??
I hope the space videos about planets and black holes and cool stuff isn't going away.
I wonder if the glass in lybia isn't caused from a huge lightning storm.
atlantologists....
heck, if we're giving ourselves titles,
i am a twinkietologist.
nice thumbnail bro!
0:58 there was no space station in orbit in 1965. The first was in 1971.
I remember Skylab when I was child.
Very interesting Mr Anderson
Interesting, thanks from Australia
Atlantice is exactly what that circular land mass of rings is. It’s insane to think it’s anything but human made.
Why do you depict earth as round, when we all know it's flat?
Excellent video
Narrator: 100,000
Screen: shows 10,000
Destiny: UFOlogist aren't real scientists
UFOlogist: am I a joke to you??
Not joking but, you can say the same about astrophysicists and cosmologists, I used to watch a lot of documentaries on that stuff until I realized everything was theories, speculation and hypothesis. Not a shred of evidence or proof to back any of it up.
3:40. please I need to know where this sound originates from.
Oh no they found my illegal parked spaceship, I'll beter move it before they put a ticket on my window
A) NOT even remotely terrifying
B) DiscoverIES. Plural.
C) What a way to completely gloss over any details and just casually talk very briefly about ancient extinct civilizations. With each topic, I feel like we were just getting to the good part - then the topic would quickly and unexplicably change to a completely unrelated topic
This is esentially just a teaser to a longer and more thorough, albeit non-existent documentary. If you ever make the actual documentary and go into more detail about each subject, I'd be glad to watch
As for this nonsense, please stop teasing and foolling us with the equivalent of a middle-school quality essay backed by good editing, high-def imagery, and an amazing voiceover
"No one is hated more than he who tells the truth" - Plato -
It looks like a landing site of a mother ship, its very extra terrestrial.
Ok so what was so terrifying about all of this?
Whats terrifying is that the supposedly most intelligent creatures ( us ) on the planet are engrossed in it.
any links with the stories or scientific journals of the content u used ? google is kinda useless
Iridym door you know That the holy Stones in mecca are the same then in creta and Delphi nice doc yunis
Amazing history…
I've got a 2.1 m tall friend and he is not even the tallest in his family, he is tall but doesn't look completely out of place with other people as is depicted here.
At 6:47 you said 100,000 years ago and your number says "10 000 years ago".
Just an fyi
Love your videos keep them up.
about the Libian Glass, there are a couple of papers written about it; i found one quite interesting from 2009, it name is "Libyan Desert Glass: has the enigma of its origin been resolved?", can be found on Sciencedirect; but that paper and others that i found, dates the glass 28 million years ago not several thousand years
You just destroyed ever ufologist by saying now let's see what the real scientists say. Lmao
real scientists theories are constantly being disproved, things like the earliest humans, the age of the sphinx, and the gunun padang pyramid are examples of their theories being disproven
California, Nevada, Washington and Oregon are in the WESTERN United States.
Explain to me why it is "terrifying"...
Eastern states... California, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. LMAO
5:56 - WOW 🤩
Years ago I was in google earth looking at the sahara desert and notice by the eye of the sahara. There was lots of stone circles and other shapes like if there was a gient mother ship park there and all the tribes people were building stuff around the mother ship .there was a acent alian war .
Ancient Civilizations. What's the big mystery. We all know it already...
"Eastern" states? Lol
6:46 - narrator says the glass is 100,000 years old and the graphic says it's 10,000. Are the people behind this channel even trying?
ikr.
Sahara desert used to be part of the ocean that’s been pushed up from the sea level.
I don't want to say its aliens, buttt....
I love this
It's fascinating.
Another banger lets GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
THANK YOU I ENJOY IT.