British Marine Reacts To USA vs CHINA - Military / Army Weapons Technology Comparison
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 02. 2024
- British Marine Reacts To USA vs CHINA - Military / Army Weapons Technology Comparison
Original Video: • USA vs CHINA - Militar...
Hello, and welcome to my channel! In this video, we delve into [Brief Description of the Video Content]. If you enjoy the content, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe for more engaging videos.
Stay Connected & Support:
Join my Telegram community: t.me/+EyuspUUHNzQ4MjQ8
Support my work on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=571382...
Become a CZcams Member: / @ryanforrest1664
Explore my content on Rumble: rumble.com/c/GenDitCommando
Don't Miss Out:
Make sure to hit the notification bell so you never miss an update. Your support means the world to me, and I appreciate each and every one of you. Thank you for being a part of this community!
Content Disclaimer:
All content on this channel is meticulously reviewed before release. It is created with the utmost respect and consideration for our audience. Any reaction videos are carefully curated, featuring original commentary to offer unique insights and perspectives.
Copyright Notice:
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of - Zábava
Sir………. I am so sorry that it has been three months.
Obviously nobody respects‘Infographics’ but it was good to see you are still blogging.
Sir…….. I would run through a wall for you. But not for Infographics 😅🤣😅
Ryan! You “Rock” dude! Always live and be well!
Thank you for the video and your response.
X-62 vista AI piloted F-16, MQ-28 ghost bat, MQ-20 avenger, MQ-8c fire scout, MQ-25 stingray, XQ-58 valkyrie, Roadrunner, Roadrunner-M, Orca autonomous submarine, perdix micro drone swarm, LRUSV, Hermeus, Task force 59 tests autonomous surface vehicles and underwater drones. Manta ray UUV.
So what I'm seeing is. Teen agers in pajamas at the computer waging war.
Royal marines rock. They are our marines grandps
I'm sorry, and this will anger a few. but when it comes to full drone/AI armies in war. i am completely against it. if you take out the human element, you take something of extreme value from that field. yes, any death in war is horrid. but thats the key issue. removing consequences of war. if we go full robotic warfare. the " W " word becomes a lot less scary and easy to toss out there when the only loss is a few dollars and not a tangible life.
Also the AI will turn on the masters
@@charlesmaurer6214it’s already happened they have our drone wingman set up on a point system every kill equals a point during testing they’d set target then remove it a the drone attacked the pilot they fix that and try again it then attacked com systems so the target couldn’t be removed keep man in control of the equipment were on the brink of I robot being a thing
Ryan, did we work together in Iraq? You do look and sound very familiar besides from this.
Are you trying to say all the brits look and sound alike! Because that's racist. 😑 absolutely kidding BTW.
@@donowen5889 HAHAHAHAHAHA! Hey, I’m from Philadelphia, and we all DO sound the same!
@@katarn0476 That jawn is facts. Powered by Wawa, a promise, and plans for summer in Wildwood. What's up, Philly?
@@Enceladus... Not the Eagles this year!
Unmanned ships can be MUCH smaller and therefore much cheaper and numerous. They could also loiter in some area for extended periods. They might deny or at least deter other Navy’s from entering the area.
Also, why would you risk sending a manned ship to fight an unmanned ship?
You are a British Marine! Nobody wins in a war. Our parents in WWII who thought they were winners, weren't ready to hear that.
Bunch of dead guys would disagree. They all wanted to win.
Keyboard general big tough guy
when i was in the Army i remember thinking about whether war is a winnable thing because i remember that coming up with family discussions sometimes. after thinking about if thats true that nobody wins in a war here is my opinion.
in the traditional sense of winning like in a sport event or game of chess the game is over when there is a winner. in chess if i checkmate the king the game ends. but WAR is different because war is driven by the politics and the times. In the movie Crimson Tide there is a scene where the XO says to the captain that in war the true enemy cant be defeated because the true enemy of war is WAR itself.
But i would say the military and the soldiers we win and find Victory when we accomplish the missions we are tasked with. and so if the mission is to defeat the eney and we accomplish that mission . Hell yes we win the battle we acomplished the mission together as a team. so there is winning and losing victory and defeat, mission accompished and mission failures.
war itself is driven by politics but the military can win and lose and can find victory and defeat.
@@JasonVanderwyk-91Bravo Thank you for your service. You have given this topic a good think. War itself is the ultimate enemy we don't know how to beat ;-(. But tasks can be worked, as a team, day by day. That is how it was when I was an embedded civilian contractor at our garrison medical facility ... for 22 years. Our team faced several big challenges that we overcame.
Just to show you how far ahead the United States is Vs China. We could give China ALL of the designs, blueprints, and engineering notes for the F-22, and they couldn't build one in 30 years. The technology, the software, and microprocessors are 50% of the equation. They can't figure it out.
And it took over a week to strip the chineese parts to allow 2 F-22 to come into strike range of a single China spy balloon. Two earlier flights were forced to turn back as the planes started to shut down.
@@charlesmaurer6214 I see..., you're a moron.There are very few fighter jets that can fly at 60,000 feet.
China believed that if they kept those balloons at an altitude of 60,000 ft, the United States wouldn't be able to shoot them down with a fighter jet. They were wrong. The United States shot three of those balloons down. One over the United States, one over Canada, and one off the coast of Alaska.
Most countries don't have fighter jets that can fly at 60,000 ft. The United States has three different types of fighters that can reach that altitude.
God bless ya
@@charlesmaurer6214 There are very few fighter jets that can reach 60,000 ft. In the United States, the F-15, F-35, and the F-22 can easily reach 70,000 ft.
The United States shut down three of those Chinese balloons that were at an altitude of 60,000 ft. One over the United States, one over Canada, and one off the coast of Alaska.
China didn't think the United States would be able to shoot their ballons down at 60,000 ft, they were wrong.
The prior 2 flights I mentioned were f22s, the electronics were shutting down due to kill switches in the chinese parts. Internal audit shows 80% of all chips in us equipment comes from china with hardwired kill switches controled by china.
2023 Bakhmut not matter
2024 Avdeevka not matterr
2025 Kyiv not matter
2026 Whats Ukraine?
15:20 He explained that AI could scan areas in combat for human faces quicker than a human could.
Don't let anyone kid you if America releases a new airplane it is probably obsolete in 5 years that's how advanced our military contractors are.
Ultimately it all boils down to the willingness of each combatants, again the USA wins In terms of quality as well as a much larger standing army than the PLA, that being said, wars are never just a numbers game in which it may sound great on paper, but in reality it’s a very different story, again take the infamous German tiger tank, being the ultimate tank of WW2 or even the Russian T34, which again both were pretty overpowered on paper, but in reality, the tigers were massive and were an absolute nightmare to get them anywhere via a train , their running gear was weak and tended to snap, it drank more fuel than a construction worker at a Christmas works do when the boss is buying all of the alcohol😂, it’s armor and cannon was absolutely insane, however it was very expensive to produce and due to the overly complex running gear and the tanks suspension being that of overlapping running wheels which helped support its immense weight, but was a massive pain in the ass for any poor bastard having to repair the suspension system or replace one of the running wheels because if one were to be damaged or destroyed, then the three other wheels would also have to be removed in order to get the one damaged one out and replaced, as for the T34, as much as people like to praise it for its sloping armor and cheap costs, but considering that Russian metal technology tends to be subpar to most other western countries in terms of purity or even quality, many T34’s were built to such a staggering levels of standards where, one tanks frontal armor might be too soft in which case a tank round would simply pass on through, or the armor was too brittle causing the armor to basically explode like a massive fragmentation grenade, much like whenever you see a smashed vase or a smashed cast iron bath tub and so on, again just because an army or piece of tech may seem superior on paper doesn’t necessarily equate it’s overall combat effectiveness in full scale warfare, not only that but you’ve also got to consider that the PLA relies more on lighter vehicles and equipment due to chinas mountainous terrain
Thank you 🙏🏾
Yea, the idea of a drone based off of the F-16 is just fecking scary. That airframe can take far more g-load than a fleshy pilot, so a drone can turn and maneuver far more aggressively than a piloted aircraft.
Look into the X-36, MQ-28 ghost bat, XQ-58 valkyrie, MQ-8 fire scout, MQ-20 avenger, MQ-25 stingray
China has absolutely no chance against the United States when it comes to technology within the military aspect..
Sanctions are only a slight upcharge currently. Export laws mean nothing when 1000s of Chinese citizens are crossing the southern border. Those people will have whatever they need if they find themselves in a position to be of value. Accepting things like freedom of movement aren't acceptable. This isn't just a fact of what has to happen now or how things are. You have to stand hard and not comply.
Something this video does not touch on much is that isn't just the USA vs China. We have technologically advanced allies in Europe and Asia; China does not.
Hi🎉
26:40 - Espionage and just plain copying is the reason.
Edit: Exactly
The US military is always researching New technology and keeping track of other countries tech
I'm getting Vietnam
deja vu.
If one knows where leaders are you also know where headquarters are and where their troops are, think lower ranking than generals - maybe for bombing missions or for knowing when and where troops are moving. Russia is now using satellites to find gatherings of troops for missions launched in minutes for drone attacks or missles.
Let's not forget the US military's focus on teaching the troops to improvise and adapt to developing situations. It's a part of our culture of creativity which China lacks. Regardless off the assets, how well will chinese soldiers be able to adapt when perfectly laid plans fall apart?
Sir, aslong as I know Luke from outdoorboys responds anymore. I might be wrong but I saw a video he said he no longers responds
The USA as they use more modern chips developed in the Netherlands.
The Netherlands produces the machines, Taiwan has the advanced infrastructure/chip factory, the US has the best architecture/design engineers for the layout of advanced chips. The US invented the microchip and has always been ahead in the architecture and design of chips. Chip factories are presently being built in Texas and Ohio so the US will no longer be dependent on foreign labor and supply (they will still require the machines from the Netherlands though).
A quid is how much us dollars?
I find it ironic that nearly every pioneer or exceptional mind that has helped pave the road toward AI, after doing so has gave us grave warnings and tried to sound the alarm, and is either laughed at as a genius whos mind has burned out and is now a coocoo, or whos words are drowned out/silenced once their usefulness has expired. The last words i remeber were those of mr musk saying something to the effect of: i trued to warn them, they wouldnt listen, there was little else i could do but plant myself in a position so as to influence the direction we are heading into a more favorable outcome (i am very roughly paraphrasing).
rule of thumb with american mil. if you know about it, it's cause they got something better.
Why the Chinese cartoons have European eyes !!!
FAFO🇺🇸🦅
Mars will never be inhabited, it’s absolutely inhabitable.
Isnt the UK the most watched country? Or did that recently change
I'd rather listen to you. Take a look at what's going on on the Indian and Tibetan border.
China is about 10-20 years behind us Mil Tech.
usa is easily winning best country of all time🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
The US had higher tech quality, however the Chinese wins in tech quantity, being more than capable of reverse engineering other countries tech and equipment more cheaply and just as effective as their competitors, again in the case of china, all they need to do is see or want the end results and work backwards from that, vs the US where it’s all about the means in order to achieve the end results and by that I mean, take the US humvee or Russian technical, or even that when automatic French 150mm artillery truck the Chinese copied, granted it does have a few minor modifications and changes, but the end results are still the same
The Hummer is solely owned by china, first thing the Union ownership did was sell Xi the entire millitary division.
How long until AI cures cancer?
The cure for cancer exists already. It's not a good business model to let the peasants know, though.
Already did. Problem is the who and medical complex wants people sick cause they can make more money that way.
This presupposes that China can survive the coming civil war. Peter Zeihan, not always right, but, China is facing some real problems, finanicially, and globally. They've got real problems. One must also understand, that the ONLY delivery systems right now that China could possibly use against the US or anyone else, is based in its ability feed its people, employ them, etc. This ability is quickly going away. Many chipmakers have already left China. Their Navy is insignificant. They also have a very large and real problem. Should they choose to become agressive, it wouldn't take much to destroy nearly half the nation, with a very small (relatively speaking) attack on the Yangtze Dam. more than 400 million people live in the path of that water, should the dam every be removed. Xi seems to be woefully underinformed about his own nation, and its capabilities. I wouldn't worry to much about china in the coming decades. They are going to be too busy just trying to survive, let alone try to attack another nation such as Tiawan.
The problem for China, is that they need two things to continue as they are. Food, and Energy. Currently, Russia supplies a great deal of both to China. This is why its important to support Ukraine. The conflict in Ukraine drains Russia of the resources (people) and as we have seen this past winter, they do not have the infrastructure to wage a long term war without a huge human cost. It also starves China of both energy and fertilizer, which they need to grow food. It should be noted as well, that China is badly situated for climate change. The over production of housing would seem good to an American, meaning cheaper housing, and more plentiful housing, however, that ruins the idea that real estate is a good investment. China continues to produce money, much as America does, but their currency is nearly worthless on a world scale. In sum, in many ways, China has isolated itself. Its populace is already restive, and as jobs dry up, and consumption goes down, so to will their ability to produce a cogent military strategy. Only the future knows what will happen in china, but I'm willing to bet good cash, that they will cease to be a world player within the next decade if Zeihan is correct. If we are going to worry about a country with global aspirations, it would probably be India, which surpassed China as the most populous country on the planet a few years ago. As China had over reported their own population.
Usuk fr
Capitalism is all about disruptive technologies. Capitalism is “creative destruction.”
Them balloons China deployed over the east coast of America or at least Michigan had one of those balloons floating over its airforce base selfrige air force base I wonder what type of information they pulled from that
Nancy Pelosi made like $10 million of Nvidia after the chips act.
Just remember Chinas tech is only as good as the country it stole it from. It doesnt innovate it steals and translates towards its own vision. It can never be better, simply on par at best and that's if it steals everything it can all at once which isn't happening. The US has been working on AI for well over a decade and change and has spent billions. They wouldn't make 5k+ AI controlled drones until they fully understood AI and made it applicable to the tech, so if they ordered them to be made they cracked the code for the AI. Mind you all this new AI software is coming from almost 20 year old military work and people already advanced it 10 fold in only a year, imagine what the military and billions did with it over 15 years. China already lost that race, best the can do it hope to steal it before they start their war. US already caught 5 spies this year, who knows how many more there are.
China has the advantage
Playing at home
Hypersonic missiles
Organized
Better educated
More of them
Getting ahead in tech
An producer of the majority of parts for even US equipment with built in kill switches Xi controls to the order of 80% of every microchip used by the US millitary. The first f22s sent to attack the balloon began shutting down as hardwear kill switches shut them down.
@charlesmaurer6214 you can bet your ass that is being or already is remedied.