How to Make $100 a Day Playing Poker (SIMPLE STRATEGY!!)
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 08. 2024
- Do you want to make $100 a day playing poker? In today's I am going to show you step by step how to make $100 a day with poker.
My free poker cheat sheet:
bit.ly/3i49sSv
BlackRain79 Elite Poker University:
Learn EXACTLY how to start crushing small and mid stakes poker games, play semi-pro or even full time pro. Use my proven elite poker strategies to start winning fast.
bit.ly/3xmQsX7 - $100 OFF WITH CODE 100OFF
My Best Selling Poker Strategy Books:
Learn my PROVEN poker strategies to crush all your opponents in small stakes poker games.
bit.ly/3vWrSJm - 20% OFF WITH CODE 20OFF
The PokerTracker HUD I use:
bit.ly/2AKdMQs
First of all, you are going to need to play in some decent stakes games, like $100 or $200 buyin cash games or $10 or $20 buyin tournaments.
Secondly, in order to make $100 a day in poker you are going to need to learn to beat both the recreational players (fish) and the good players (regs).
In today's video I am going to walk you through a hand versus a good player and how I extract the absolute maximum against them to win the most.
Do you make a $100 a day playing poker? Is this a goal of yours?
Let me know in the comments below.
Instagram: / officialblackrain79
Twitter: / blackrainpoker
Thank you for watching.
Please SUBSCRIBE for new poker videos every week!
bit.ly/3kLxYrn
All the best at the poker tables :)
DISCLOSURE: Some of the links above are affiliate links, which means, at no additional cost to you, I may earn a commission if you decide to make a purchase and/or subscribe. Affiliate commissions help fund videos like this one.
The poker strategy advice in this video is for educational purposes only. If you choose to play poker for real money, please always play responsibly and within your limits.
Do you make $100 a day playing poker? Also, check out my other new video on how to make $50 a day playing poker: czcams.com/video/6rhAuVKzi3o/video.html
The title could also be: How to overplay AA deep stacked like an amateur...
Ive been burned bad doing the same.
or, 'how trip jacks crack your aces'
how would you have played it?
Against AA always wipe outs my buy ins
These videos where you walk us through your thought process are soooooo helpful, it teaches me how to think about the game not just what to do in what situation
Thanks Logan, I appreciate it. I will try to make some more vids like this!
Are we assuming that pocket 10s are out of 4 bet range for this opponent? It seems believable he could have 10s with the ship on the turn rather than a straight imo.
Exactly this!
I would argue that perhaps he considered shoving turn to rep QQ which is what a lot of poor(?) regs would also do. Telling a believable story that vil has a strong overpair with an open ended draw and that if hero wants to continue chasing with any weak pair or draw also it'll be expensive.
Of course with our AA it'd still be a call but villain can't know that.
Hi Nathan. This is great info. But modern day casinos only spread 1/2 NLHE with max $40.00-$80.00 buy-ins. So, what kind of strategy do we use for THIS!!! This isn't poker..it's something else. It must be purely mathematical, so if all players are short stakced, now what? I can't find any strategy info on this ANYWHERE.
a video on how to play pocket aces???
I somewhat disagree with your titles on videos like this. There are a lot of videos called "How to make X in X time period". I understand you have to do what you have to do to get views but the title is a little off to me.
The video is really educational but your viewers are kinda left to figure out the point of video is. From this video you explain a lot about 3-4 bet pots and the range of your opponent which is great to learn but I feel like viewers would benefit more from having the lesson of the video in the title to reinforce the point.
Great video as always though. There is fantastic information in here it's just a little tricky to figure out what we're learning sometimes!
I am just trying out some different titles to see what works and what doesn't. It gives me data to use for future videos. Titles like this simply outperform more boring titles by a wide margin. That is why they are widely used.
Hi Nathan,
Don’t you think 3betting though has expanded fairly consistently these days? 3betting at this level prob represents a solid 8-10% of many players ranges so a 3bet doesn’t have to be a super tight range as 3betting %s increase.
That's true in general, but not in this case given HJ 3betted UTG reg with 4 players still left to act. The ranges here are almost always going to be premium only unless all 4 players behind are very passive nits unlikely to interfer and UTG reg folds enough to 3bets to justify a polarized 3betting range that will include bluffs.
If hero was BU 3betting HJ then 8% would make more sense.
He can definitely have KQs in his range as it is often used as 4bet bluff in this positions
and now we know how to play it for max value, shark with aces never folds
Lol no one uses KQ as a 4 bet bluff
@@henster305 Not true...since KQ blocks KKs/QQs, the hand can credibly rep those made/nutted hands a portion of the time.
You would have to know the player, as the guy in the video obviously did. Your play drastically changes when playing against certain people.
Really love your content, keep up the good work!
Thank you sir!
I think the biggest challenge is doubting my own range skills, everytime I trust my instincts and knowledge of ranges I do well, everytime I let irationality kick in and play like a "gambler" I lose money, who knew lol
Do you guys keep notes on the other players? I need to incorporate that and pay more attention better. I know I play too many tables and sometimes not mentally present like I should be
You forgot sets JJ which would be in his range.
Yeah I was thinking this... 10-JJ are all reasonable 4 betting hands.
That's true but I believe the check on the flop into the turn shove makes it highly unlikely. Somebody trying to extract value from a top set wouldn't usually try to represent a straight draw like that unless they are prone to pulling off "fancy plays" like that.
What website is he playing on?
Very usefull analysis..
Thanks Nathan.
After doing all that...Queen comes on the river😂....that's what happens to me every time 😂. Opponent hitting the gut shot or the one outer on the river on bigger pots
Thank you! This is a great walkthrough of identifying an opponents range.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Damn, but what if he had AKh and you got murdered by the 3 h that dropped? you had no blocker, so its def in his range. I would make the call, but I would also be crushed when I saw the 3h
Against AKh, they have 13 outs for about 26% chance of winning. Still a call. You'll lose about 1/4 time but it's still the right call. Part of the game
Amazing video mate, best poker video I have seen
Great video, thx! Which poker sites do you recommend? Thx!
What about jj or 10s
You said he could have it preflop.
If so he could have set of jj or 10 s
Please advise
"Never in his range".
As someone that plays loose and like to semi-bluff and have my opponent questioning if I'm value of block betting, I will say that I would totally play a king queen that aggressively..
I watch all your videos and find them really useful.
But your advice is always restricted to the tactics and strategy of that particular hand.
How would you play hands where despite everything it is a 50/50 tossup as to whether you are winning or not - in other words how much uncertainty would cause you to fold? In most hands - especially on Zoom - everyone folds after the flop and very little money changes hands. The big money changes hands when 2/3 players have big hands - and this is not often. As a result the 50/50 tossup situation occurs quite frequently and has a large effect on your win rate. I suspect your answer to this question will be - the more hands you play the less the uncertainty will be!
So in a future video can you provide an idea of the hours per day required to make $100 per day for a professional level player playing Zoom and how many names would he be playing under?
Thanks for the feedback Will, I will keep trying to mix it up with these vids.
So are we willing to live with them having a set of J’s, 9’s, and 10’s? I feel like even at micro levels players are playing those cards that way pre-flop more than AK.
I've never seen 9s or 10s played this way by a "bad reg". JJ maybe sometimes but that's one good hand he has and the rest are bluffs.
Pocket rockets should always be played agressively and raise 10x atleast the bigblinds.. better to win small amount than to lose big amount of your stacks coz you slow play your cards..
lol
Go to bed dude
what site you play on blackrain?
so what you are saying is we should ship if we have a straight or a set of jacks because you wouldn't be able to fold aces... thanks
If u have straight you are a loosing player is what he says and if you have JJ its a bad beat.
The goal of poker is to have your opponents trying to read you like Helen Keller falling down the stairs in a washing machine.
How come the 8 and the Q always seem to drop when I’m playing :)
If he is a decent player, his 4bet range will be wider than mentioned. AA,KK, QQ,JJ, AQo, KQs, KJs, KTs, AJs, ATs ,A5s all with some frequencies
He did mention that it was a bad reg, so maybe the hud had a pretty tight 3-4bet range? Would like to hear that from Nathan, as it's a pretty important consideration
A5s is definitely not in his range
@Oleg So, you say UTG 4bets only with a linear range AA,KK,QQ, AK in this spot ?You might be right. This is player dependent. But the fact is If someone constructs his 4bet range only linear, then it s not a good strategy.
@@colin6673 Definitely it is. At least it should be
I've seen this a couple times now, why is A5s a 3 or 4-bet hand, but people never say A4s, or A3s, as a 3 or 4-bet hand.
That was one of the best videos I have seen in a while.
I could have shipped it all in preflop. I like the rest of explanations.
Are HUDs still allowed on the more popular poker sites?
Not understanding why he couldn’t have pocket Jacks or even pocket 10s based on his betting. Preflop you have home beat. But, they end up beating pocket Aces on flop or river due to the set they obtain. Then he just lures you to bring in more money!
Always heads up!!!!
Not sure why he'd go al in with nothing after you called his 4 bet, knwoing that you would have something pretty strong? I woild think he'd be pretty sure you had a strong pocket pair at least? Seems he would check to,you, then thunk about folding if you went all in, likely revealing that you had strong pocket pair, or hit trips? Or made a straight? (Though he likely wouldn't think you'd call a 4 bet with k-q) his AK would be at best a bluff catcher at the turn.? I don't think I'd go all in when someone called 4 bet indicating strength to begin with?
Rule one, click "dont show any content from channel" next to his channel and learn poker from someone who wins at poker.
Man I guess I give my opponents' too much credit. I always like to try to figure out what they have and when they went all in I immediately assumed they had QQ. With a board having 9, 10, and J, the top of the open-ended straight draw plus overpair was the only thing that I thought was in their range where the semi-bluff seemed like a good play to me. But actually they had an even worse hand than that. The good news for me is that, expecting a QQ, I'd still call.
What app / site are you playing on?
can you tellme what you do when you are not delt good cards for very long and your luck doesnt seem to change. should i just quit for the day? or wait for the nutz folding a lot
Depends on your mental
Great stuff
I don’t really understand the guy could’ve easily had pocket eights or king queen suited where do these guys play where do you guys play that people play like this tell me where is so I can go
At the turn, why he is not saying that he has 3 jacks or 3 tens?
Okay I read your article on why PokerStars is not rigged and I generally agree with all your comments but I would tend to say that from my experience and of course this is not a sample satisfactory enough it begs a question whether the down swings and up swings in the hands do not promote depositing money to the account again by players thus driving profit. Yesterday and today I played something around a 200 hands sample which we know from the statistics 120 sample is enough for some normal distribution to be tested by the T-student or other Gauss based methods. I played some super solid poker and had good reads, seriously. I got tilted 7 (seven!) times in a row by a river card forming a set of 3s, 5s or 7s and the likes. That doesn't mean PokerStars is rigged, but I think it promotes major swings so that you spend money and go all in and you keep on playing. Otherwise half a billion dollars profit every year would not happen if the losers always lost and the winners would always win. The popularity of such a platform would quickly diminish and we all know addressable market and ranges are super important. You need volume of players and games, tournaments, hands to make profit. This is how the propagation works and there has to be a sense that everybody can win which we know is not true. So not to say that PokerStars is rigged, but I would err on the side of doubt that it is purposefully skewed so that it is interesting, there are major swings in the hands artificially amplified and everybody can win, even the stupid players against the odds. For your benefit, money was not involved, I was simply training in poker tokens, not real money. What is the probability that a river card beats a higher hand 7 times in a row? Simplified math says 2/52 (assuming no one folded the fourth set forming card) to the power of 7... which is circa 4%^7... I should play bingo or lotto perhaps, but I say it is so unlikely that I don't think this is an incidence and blind RNG. It is so skewed AF. To conclude, your article has all the right arguments why PokerStars is not rigged, but it doesn't answer the key question are the hands generated there not skewed. I suspect they might be to promote volatility. Theoretically if we believe they provide accurate data sets we could download all the history and check probabilities versus reality and check the variance. But they don't even react to the hands where I pinpointed errors (I had a hand when I lost with a set against a straight, the only problem was the guy did not have a straight and the system generated some stupid comment that the opponent won with a straight 9 to Ace which is absurd).
I've been playing online poker since 2001 and I can tell you it is rigged for the exact reasons you listed. Sometime around 2008 the software across the industry became a lot more sophisticated and it became less easy to win. My general estimate is it is connected to deposit/withdrawal/win/loss/time played/hands played and the "random deck" pops the river to the assigned winner by the algorithm. Previous to roughly 2008 it was a lot more random but these days if you play long enough online you will see the patterns. The software has only become more and more sophisticated as time has passed. One day it will probably come out.
Could easily have JJ or TT
Another solid video! Loved the AK ship repping nothing lol.
What if the River had been a Queen? Those are the bad luck that happens to me.
Great content thank you
Glad you enjoyed it
Set of Jacks or a set of 10's easily could be in his range. Pocket Queens could have made that play, as they have an over and picked up an open-ended although the Queens probably lead out on the flop. I'm actually very surprised that he showed up with AK after calling the flop.
What are the best online poker sites in America to do this? Because some of them are different than others
hi , did you find out ? i really like to know too
@@love_the_greatests7426 they need am episode of unsolved mysteries to find this out.
You need to play 20 ten dollor tourneys with a 50% roi to make 100 a day on average its just a math problem 😊.Love the example thx
50% roi is unrealistic though, even though there are 10 dollar mtts i think , am I wrong?
@@jb-rx2ig For most yes but its just a example.
@@jb-rx2ig talking the same thing
and how did you know he was not holding a jack set on the flop?
pocket Jacks or even 8's are still able to call this.
Cool advice thanks
Thanks Darren!
If we assume he is incapable of reading ranges, why are we so certain he isn't "value betting" a set? I have seen players do this numerous times when they turn their miracle set. I mean I'm still calling every time with the aces. But I don't feel that great about it tbh
He can certainly have JJ, but that's only three combinations out of all the ones he can have.
What do you guys think of a small re raise to $88 at 7:05, impossible for him to fold to such a small re raise.
It's always possible to fold. AK is a good candidate to fold there, you only have 6 cards you can consider outs. And if the opponent has AA you have no outs :)
But he could had TT right?
I play $.25/.50 and I’ve basically given up on ranges. Ffs today a dude opened 3bb UTG and got 2 callers, I raised to 20bb from the CO with KK. Flop comes down J 4 7 with 2 diamonds. I fire a cBet of 25bb and dude calls. Next card come 7hearts. I jam for 3/4 pot and dude calls - beats with with 7-3 offsuit. He called a 20bb 3bet out of position with 7-3 offsuit. How the hell do you play ranges with shit like that going on?
On those stakes you have to adjust your strategy by overfolding, if its +EV. Usually someone that plays 73o isnt gonna be able to bluff you to exploit overdolf.
Also, realize that over the long game, your move was a +EV, he just got lucky.
Still its frustrating af, but you can adjust.
Or anyway, thats my experience after learning from higher level players and then playing microstakes / low stakes.
My theoretical understanding is pretty good, but my in-practice play consistently undercuts my ability. How can I best translate my knowledge into practice, and not let external factors affect this process?
Number one thing is to recognize when you are on tilt and to stop playing.
Watch your play, review your hands before sitting down to play, and pick out one area you want to improve on and just focus on that.
Take care of your body and mind before hand - exercise, eat well, sleep well and meditate before you play.
I agree. I feel like you have to focus on one or two things. I feel like you are in a good spot with preflop ranges and continuation bets than you move on. For me, it’s working on 3 betting for values and the occasional bluffs. Calling 3 bets. Handling river bets
thing is... couldn't a bad reg that doesn't understand ranges 4-bet on KQ exactly because he's a bad reg? I can see a bad reg overplaying their hand and/or thinking KQ is better than it is. there's a lot of bad info on poker out there and people will follow it. thank you for all the videos!
Maybe, but the fact that they do this in early position having otherwise normal stats makes it unlikely that the player is "that bad". Somebody who values KQ so high would probably have looser stats in general.
@@jeffsfrozenjoghurt4773 that's a very good point. hence HUD info being so important. thank you for the reply.
you said yourself he may have pocket jacks so why did you say you are still in good position?? heck he may have had suited cards and that would be enough to make such a pre flop bet so that flop is scary
Who else came to this video after looking up how andrew tate makes hes money 🤣
No way. Any reg or rec or pro would never jam all-in on that board. Never. When you call $44, your opponent is putting you on a pair like JJ, 10s, 9s, 8s, or even QQ. So this is a totally fictional fantasy that a player would jam overbet all-in with AK and give all his money away. Would never happen in real life. Just a ridiculous example if u ask me. (But I still like your videos.)
Yes, I was just wondering what site he is playing at. I've never seen anybody do that, even at 25nl.
He literally says it's from a game online. This shit happens all the time. I had a guy chase me down for $1000 with nothing but a gutshot. I've seen bluffs like this one. People are idiots out there
@@fundyspokerblog This does not happen all the time. You are lying. Very rarely would this happen. It makes no sense. Therefore, its a totally moronic example to teach on. He is basically teaching: if a really bad player ever makes an incredibly bad play all-in overbet, and you have Aces, you should call. Who needs a video on that dumb advice? Everyone already knows that. Duh.
@@chitownlew What possible reason could I have for lying? I've seen it. People think they need to be all fancy because they've seen it on TV and like he said, people don't consider what ranges their opponent is putting them on.
This kind of bad plays do happen, but it can happen more often depending on what site you use.
vs. AA everyone looks like a bad reg...
When I play, the opponent will have 8-2 off and win. :)
You can win with a crap hand you just have to play the odds and long term you'll win, you just have to take the Ls when you get them.
App name????
I don't think it works that way
Good thing he didn’t have pocket J
You need to work on your. Bluffing range. Your opponent should not be able to assume aces if you 5bet pre. You don't need a lot of bluffs but just adding AK and Aks would help
My man, I have a question for you.
Do you think is harder to be profitable at really low stakes like 10$ than it is at medium as 200$.
My idea is that I should not go on upper stakes until I become profitable at lower stakes (cause I'm thinking it's gonna be even harder)
But, sometimes it gets me crazy when I see what kind of hands I got called with.
Or what kind of hand people think should go all in with at 10$ stakes...
I feel like at least theplayers gonna be more responsable at higher stakes, but I'm not sure. I might just not play well enough.
I’d recommend loading in 300$ for 30 buy ins in 10nl .. 0.05$/ 0.10$ is low enough for a beginner. And winning in 10nl is a good stake to make a nice chunk of change each month. Don’t start in 2nl. They aren’t all that much different. Try to grind that up. Then once you hit 30 buy ins at the next stake (750$) take a shot with 3 buy ins. If you lose that in 25nl (75$) move back down. Grind it back up and try again. Always move down if you get to 30 buy ins at the previous stake. If you can’t beat 10nl you need to study. If you don’t move back down when you lose the 3 buy ins for your shot at the next stake, you will go broke. That’s my advice. Nathan doesn’t really respond. I’m certain black rain would agree with this.
Whats going to happen is youll hit a bad beat and loose your buy in 90% of the time. If you can be the first one to never get a bad beat you will make money in poker haha!
$100 a day? Over how many hours? $100 dollars a day for a one hour session may be okay but if you're putting in many hours that's hardly worth you're time.
Unless you're living in a cheap country where 3k a month allows you to live really well. Probably beats most jobs for most people.
@@virtualsnake1994 not in the US then.
3k $ is a lot of money in 90% of countries
Thanks for the video man
No prob Kylin glad this one helped!
Problem Is when they 4bet you with 89off and then flops straight and your AK gets cracked Just cause their story Is too good but in another planet. You can't Imagine how they're so trash to understand ranges and they still keep winning huge pots. If i throw away my Money like they do I would be poor in a few days
You didn’t tell anyone how to make $100 a day
Gd day Nathan, do u use Neteller (eWallet); for yur poker withdrawal transactions & is it link to Thailand banks ? Tqvm
11-00: Don't you think that there's a strong possibility that he COULD be 'pulling you in' by how his early bets were, only to 'kick your ass!' once he KNEW he had a straight? Personally, I have seen such a scenario work against me on numerous occasions! ;-)
As Nathan said, nobody would be 4betting pockets 8s or KQ from early position and if they somehow did there would be many, many situations to exploit that in later hands.
@@jeffsfrozenjoghurt4773 Such as ?
Great video! I appreciate the content. I suppose it isn't that likely that he had a set of Jack's. That would be the only hand I would be leary of. But UTG, 4 bet pot is a stretch for Jack's.
Is doing all that not a stretch also with with big slick? I'd say yes. I would not of folded aces here, but I'd at least acknowledge that trip jacks are a very real range for villain. I would be more likely to raise utg with pocket jacks than with AK.
Then he turn over pocket jack and you lost all your money lol
:D I tkink than he ate his laptop after this game :D
At the stakes I play villain would be flipping over 82o and stacking me
Quit it with the loser talk. Bad beats always happen, but you can't let them affect your play (which is what you do subconsciously when you dwell on it like this)
Over time, the 82o 4 better is going to lose. And you will win, if you play right.
Then stop making tiny 3bets . Make them pay properly with your good hands if they are willing to enter with such garbage !!! I would like to play againbst such villain any day of the week
I’ve been playing 2 weeks and I’m at $73/day
Nice one. What's your go to sites?
Nice in theory. But we need to consider many factors: How often is he 4betting from utg? How is our own history with this player? Could this player be on tilt? How often did we fold to a 4bet to him? If he is a decent player depending on our own history with him I wouldn't be so sure to snapcall the turn. He might have 88, 99, KQs, or the Jacks. Sometimes maybe even 77, or Tens which hitted the turn. But I think I would call there, too. I must have very very good reasons to fold my Aces in a pot after called a 4bet preflop. Also the call makes sense. Not only because of his assumed range but also if not more because you represented weakness with your small cbet on the flop. Weaker regs often think that you would have AK and are trying to take away the pot with your small bet. Nice hand! Was this at Zoom or at regular tables? What winrates to you consider achieveable atm? (Zoom, Cashgame on "softer" sites?... Unfortunately cashgame beside Zoom seems to be nearly dead...). And would you call the All In on the turn against a player with a wide 4-bet-range preflop who is pretty good postflop? Or then play the hand differently on the flop (with a bigger Continuation Bet)?
It wasn't a cbet bc hero was the preflop caller. Also, the small size on flop in 4betted pot doesnt represent weakness imo. It's quite standard given the lower stack to pot ration of 4betted pots, meaning hero didnt need to bet big to get the stacks in the middle.
The small size in 4bet pots also glues weaker hands that would fold to bigger sizes, while also leaving villain with enough room to try and bluff us with some of his air (AK), which he wouldn't have otherwise.
We don't need protection here bc villaing only has 1 combo of flush draws (AhKh) and 0 combos of straight draws. QQ and KK have only 2 outs each. Non hearts AK is nearly half of his range and has close to 0 equity on the flop. Lots of our ev comes from not making it easy for Villain to fold AK
@@lucascavalcantidossantos Of course I meant bet and not cbet. But without clear reads on my opponent I wouldn't always give him such a narrow range. Depends on stats, reads and my own "history" against a player. As I mentioned, it depends on reads and the own history against villain. But I wouldn't fold my Pocket Aces here considering the "plan" for the hand which worked perfectly in this specific case. If villain is a thinking player he would know that this isn't a good bluffing spot for him given his stats (as far as we get to know in the video).
Just send the game link why u people like this dont even send a game poker game
Inserzionista a pubblicitario
Please condense your vids. This could be a 7 min vid
so you make 100 a day or 50 ?:)
Where can I play some texas holder online???
Everyone except *cough* mike postel *cough*
10’s or Jacks would open up and 4 bet pre-flop and rags know how to slow play so this is bad advice
You dont. RNG is rigged so you WONT ... 4 million hands played online here ...
6-28: Could he too, not have pocket Aces? ;-)
Yes, but only 1 combo. There are 12 combos of KK + QQ and 8 combos of AK (we block 8 of 16). So he would only have AA 1/20 = 5% of the time if his range is QQ+ ,AK+. If he has anything else, then he would have AA even less often than 5%.
Hold on, on a different vid named how to make 5k a month you suggested playing 100nl, but now on how to make 3k a month you suggest 200nl?
Related question: Im playing 60nl on a phone app filled with whales, my reasoning was that I could easily make 100$ a day on average just playing standard. Am I wrong?
Yeah I noticed that too. Generally speaking, he talks about it as a side income, not full time. I think playing full time at these stakes should net a decent player more money than that? Especially since he mentions in his cheat sheat that live 200nl players earn about $25/hour, and live games are much softer than online ones
Which phone app is it?
excellent.
Thank Jim!
$100 a day would be great if I was living in a hut in Africa. I live in NY. Tell me how to make $1,000 a day
I made a video on that a few weeks ago.
Villain could of easily had pocket jacks and cracked your aces. Weird that you would completely ignore that. Like his range could be low as pocket queens, but never jacks. If villain would bluff all in with big slick after raising out of position utg, then he certainly would do all that with pocket jacks. Just saying.
Total contraction of strategy. He said at the beginning that his range could be 10’s or Jacks… sure enough the flop hits a jack.. he said he is not worried at that point.. even a 10 shows up, which he put in his range and goes all in at that point… which says he might have hit his 10’s and protecting it against a straight… not a great video I’m afraid
Fair points! Thanks for watching my poker videos!
Why does someone have such a night and day difference between live poker and on line play. This is very puzzling to me. My video poker is in the toilet.
11:54 And lets see what he has. Oh ... Hes got 83 ... Well that was not a good example let's try another one :-))
Just kidding. Great video.