Stereotypical Ways Countries Fight Wars
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 06. 2024
- We would like to extend a huge 'thank you!' to Opera for sponsoring today's video! Please click our link: opr.as/Opera-browser-Simple-h... and download Opera today FOR FREE for a faster, safer, and smarter way to browse the web. In a digital age of invisible threats, use a browser you know you can trust.
Inspired by the Mitsi Studio video: • How Countries Fight Th...
Thanks to everyone on our Simple History Patreon! Become a member today and help us in our mission to provide fresh, regular content!: / simplehistory
Check out our other Channel: / @simplehistorylive
Discord server: / discord
Become a Simple History member: czcams.com/users/simplehistory...
Copyright: DO NOT translate and re-upload our content on CZcams or other social media.
SIMPLE HISTORY MERCHANDISE
Get the Simple History books on Amazon:
www.amazon.com/Daniel-Turner-...
T-Shirts
teespring.com/stores/simple-h...
Simple history gives you the facts, simple!
See the book collection here:
Amazon USA
www.amazon.com/Daniel-Turner/e...
Amazon UK
www.amazon.co.uk/Daniel-Turner...
/ simple-history-5494376...
/ simplehistoryyt
Credit:
Show Created by Daniel Turner (B.A. (Hons) in History, University College London)
Script: Robert De Graff
Narrator:
Chris Kane
vocalforge.com/
Thank you to Opera for making today's video possible! Please click our link: opr.as/Opera-browser-Simple-history to download Opera FOR FREE! Trust Opera as a faster, smarter and more secure way to browse the web. Sponsorships are so important in allowing us to continue our mission of providing unique content for you, our fans. We really appreciate your support!
how does he use those emojis
Would be real nice if you guys gave SOME sort of credit to mitsi studios for yhe countries intros
Do a video on war TACTICS TOUSSAINT LOUVERTURE..
Can you stop showing your face in every video
Why are you promoting Opera? It's literally CCP spyware, really irresponsible promoting it as a _trustable_ browser when it's anything but that.
Mitsi Studio Joined The Chat
I was just about to say that they did it better
I think they both did it great not one is better they have the same quality but i do think its a bit rude not Crediting Mitsi for the Countries introductions
Bro didn't even try to hide it
I don't know who Mitsi is but I doubt the topic started with them.
Haha
The overwhelming american firepower to take down the chinese weather balloon had me dying 🤣
"Weather balloon"
They got money to spend.
Well, there's a saying. When the enemy is in that direction, "Roger sir, eliminating that direction."
Right? The results of a bloated, runaway military budget.
I had to pause the video immediately and went straight to the comment section when I saw that clip. 😂
"It's all fun and games until the trees start speaking Vietnamese"
*This words never gets old 🗿*
uhm, actually🤓it's these words, not this words
@DarkIsToNight
That would have meant war with China.
@DarkIsToNight Which they never did kekw
Now..
It's fun and game until stones and sand dunes start speaking Arabic.. 🗿
@DarkIsToNight Never said it wasn't
I used to be a GI like you, till I got yeeted by a talking tree
Hi
Hi
COMRADE SCROPO.
Eyyy comrade! You here😅.
priviet comrade
Napoleon's main strengths in war was speed.
The French army nowadays utilizes speed.
"Ce n’es pas au vieux singe qu’on apprend la grimace"
In other words : even though this tactic is old, it is still highly effective
In different directions, of course.....jk jk.
@@chatdeblancyou CANNOT do France like that 💀
@@joelsmith3797Ironically, the white flag with Fleur de lys reminds the times when France was a military juggernaut, and when multiples coalitions were needed to confront them.
France: *dominates continental Europe for literal centuries*
Also France: *surrenders to Germany after losing Paris*
The rest of the world for the next 80 years: "Haha, what are you gonna do France? SURRENDER on me?"
surrendering AND collaborating may have meant something you know...
@@animeXcaso yeah because the Resistance wasn't a thing
@@animeXcaso and you aren't educating anyone by blatantly not getting a joke
@@redtube8667 The resistance from abroad lmao
@@stefanogandino9192 the Resistance wasn't from abroad lmao. You can just say you have no idea what you're talking about
"Chinese zerg rush tactics are just a sterotype!"
"We actually sneak up first, and then we zerg rush!"
Стереотип это само глупое что может быть в человеческом сознании, и из этих стереотипов реальность рушиться . вон украинцы поверили в европейские , американские английские танки . но в условиях реальности эти танки выбивают так же как российские .
@@user-ib4wh2yq8dtrue but 2400 MBT?
anyone heard the Chinese battle horn is terrerifiying
@@iaminevitablethanos5168 Both sides in Ukraine have summary 1600-1800 tanks. Where "2400 MBT" you get from?
@@AlexMSQ the first one is about the Russian losses (~2600 Tanks) the third one is the losses of Ukraine (~600 Tanks) both of the links are followed by another article about their bias and reliability I will also add another link for the reliability of the source I’m using for knowing how reliable the others are.
So there’s where I found sources saying Russia took more losses in total.
As a Brit we don’t fight wars
We hire the locals to fight for us 😂 but when it does come down to getting the hands dirty, we send in a couple of Scottish highlanders armed with bag pipes to terrorize the enemy day in and day out and on the second day they can force a surrender 😂😂
"awwwwwhhh but i dont wanna fight a war can we send a puppet state or one of the three countries absorbed into ours after them"
-british embassy
one stack of likes
As a scot I can confirm this 🇬🇧
@@ciaranReal 😂
@@ciaranReal so as a fellow UK resident, can I ask one simple question?… and that is in their right minds would actually want to invade the UK? Our economy is mostly financial so any attacks on our cities would immediately cripple our economy making any vested invasions practically worthless, weve barely got any resources left since we’ve used most of It up so we’ve had to borrow others peoples resources, it rains 70% of the annual year, half of our population are mostly foreigners and those who are native Brit’s are either half drunk or gong to a liberal arts college in order to know that’s the difference between a man or a woman, if the go anywhere further up north it’s freezing cold and if they decided to invade wales, well it’s wales, mud, rain and general discomfort 24/7 and who’s main source of income is sheeps, so again my point still stands.
Why would anyone in their right minds want to attack a country who’s military research and development comes from a middle age man as their sheds, a nuclear fleet of British submarines stationed in Scotland because the UK government hates nukes and wants to scrap their nuclear deterrent program entirely, all the while constantly cutting funds for our military which makes less than half of our annual requirement standards on a yearly basis, two super carriers with a handful of aircrafts that are capable of using them, a population of over 60% who doesn’t identify as British and with a media outlet that hates all straight white males, along with an air force that’s trying to reduce it’s white applicants due to diversity reasons and an economy so scary, Steven king might be able to make a horror movie with it, all the while we have ever increasing inflation and interest rates as well as the fact that we’ve barely got enough money to pay our doctors or house the homeless people already living in the UK, but we seem to have enough money to build shelter and accommodations for illegal immigrants as well as financing a war in Ukraine and the Middle East, all at taxpayers expenses, meanwhile the fat pigs in power are patting themselves on the back thinking that they deserve a 10k pay rise 😂, so again why would anyone want to invade the UK when it’s clearly going to be a waste of time, money and resources.😂
I love how Simple History is straight to the point and delivers it really well
They are simple for a reason
"it's all fun and games until the trees start talking vietnamese" 😂😂
Its good to see that France learn from their mistake of WW2 and now utilise speed and quick decision making, unlike what they did during the french campaign of 1940
What's sad is thatt if you look at Napoleonic war, speed was already a big part of the French strategy.
You're right. They utilize speed while running away from the enemy
@@TheOneManWhoBeatYou «These Frenchmen, under the gallant leadership of general Molinié, had for four critical days contained no less than seven German divisions which otherwise could have joined in the assaults on the Dunkirk perimeter. This was a splendid contribution to the escape of their more fortunate comrades of the British Expeditionnary Force »
- Winston Churchill, The Second World War. vol. II. Their Finest Hour.
@@TheOneManWhoBeatYou ironic you say that when france is literally the most victorious country on earth 🤣🤣
@@MrEviLow Yes that sad but France after ww1 was lead by old almost dead General, 300km away from the front who didn't understand the importance of fast moving offensive, decision making and the intensive use of tank.
When the sky speaks American
The forest must speaks Vietnamese
(No joke, as the Vietnamese and two of my grandfathers were both Veterans, I was well taught how to hide in the forest and how to build basic trap when I was young. Now no one want to play hide and seek with me, especially in the forest or mountain)
This went to a light hearted joke to "i've got no frieeeenddss 😢😢😢😢😢😢" 😂
The sky also spoke Vietnamese. They had many flying aces trained by the Japanese, Soviets, and Chinese.
@@ferretyluvNot trained by the chinese but Soviets and North Koreans. The chinese didn't have enough planes or experiences to be training anyone.
Actually, Soviet instructors taught Vietnamese, comrade.
i was so mad about terrain debuffs in hearts of iron 4, i thought how i can get -50% attack penalty or even -100%, then after watching this video i get it
Fun fact, De Gaulle, before the war, had written a book on new ways to fight a war, especially aggressive and rapid warfare, the germans really got interested in the book and thanks to it, they created the famous Blitzkrieg tactics. France took back the idea after the war, thus explaining those very efficient and precise war tactics
source: ah's left nut
it is just napoleonic tactics brought to 20th century warfare
No. Being german, Brittas boyfriend, there was NO Blitzkrieg tactic, this word was not invented in Germany. It was simply prussian doctrine of ,fight of combined weapons ' enlarged with new , weapons' tank and plane.
@brittakriep2938 oh yeah I know the word didn't exist yet, but since I didn't expect everyone to know that I just wrote it there, but what's for sure is that this tactic originates from Charles De Gaulle
@@brittakriep2938Napoléon 1
For the US military, let's not underestimate the power of Emma with two moms and trying to be gender diverse and inclusive. 🙄
Dont piss off Emma, she will find where you live and press that big red button to drone strike you
You sound like a crybaby. She's probably tougher than you.
Yes, because when Emma and her two moms is the drone operator that’s one button away from wiping out enemy forces half way across the world, sitting in an AC cooled room drinking Coffee and relaxing: you cannot underestimate that 🤫
Nicely done as always Simple History. Keep it up, cheers🎉
Epic concept. Keep up the good work! 💪😀
hey i like ur videos
very epic indeed
There is ma man
1:13 The US throwing everything they have at a Chinese weather balloon 🤣🤣
"Because overkill is overrated and I am the biggest *ahem* in the locker room" 😂
That will teach them to spy on us -Murica 2023
The US is completely over hyping. If China wants to investigate the US border, its Beidou satellite will have a clearer view. There is no more efficient reconnaissance force on the modern battlefield than satellites
😂😂😂
I'm a Canadian veteran and I have seen first hand how the yanks fight. I have personally witnessed shock and awe warfare.
And what is your opinion of the American war machine? How effective is it and what were its weaknesses?
Lol did they invade you thinking you were Russia or something
if you go to new england don't call anyone there a yankee. (New England is Mass, Maine,Vermont New Hampshire, and Rhode Island)
@@luongo7886it's not very effective, it's amazing against poorly equipeed nations or insurgents. Their really war equipment is subpar though, artillery and air defense although advanced and accurate isn't up to the task of a wars quantitative demands. They know theyll never really fight a war so they aren't prepared for one at all. Unless they decide to be really dumb and actually provoke a war in china
May I ask if by yanks you were referring to Vietnamese?
"War's tragedy is that it uses man's best to do man's worst." - Harry Emerson Fosdick
Russians and Chinese: we are the only ones using human waves
WW2 Japanese: you sure?
Chinese: Why don't you take a look at how many people on average have a gun? How many bullets per person on average?
@@linshitaolst4936 one
Russians never used human waves, it literally gets debunked in this video
That hot balloon with Chinese flag quickly made me laugh & getting a btter understanding how the countries battled was good. I enjoyed your graphics
Keep going strong with your vids love them
Finally, someone showed USSR army as not some stupid grunts who rush into battle without weapons.
I appreciate it ❤ subscribed
When you give one guy the gun and the other the bullets. You kind of do it to yourself. Thankfully (depending on which side you're on) Russia is now smarter than that.
I kinda miss those videos from mitsi studios. I hope they made more videos of war fighting techniques of each country because there are a lot of country still left with unnoticed.
Bro did america dirty in the thumbnail 💀
China used the 3-3 tactic on the Korean battlefield, which was very effective. It once only relied on three people to occupy two artillery positions of the Indian army
Everybody talking about the trees speaking Vietnamese, yet they don’t talk about how short the sentences were.
The US Marine Corps rolling up with the M50 Ontos: “Load the Beehives”
A love how much this references the other Viral Video by Mitsi Studio.
ditto.
I really want more videos like this
"After knowing their weakness i sent wave after wave of my own men untill they had reached their kill limit"
- Zap Brannigin
*their
@@ferretyluv DAMMIT
Another aspect of aircraft carriers that people don’t really think about is the American Helo carriers are not technically classified as aircraft carriers under that same statistic. With the marine F 35s, you can successfully launch those off of a Helo carrier. This just further is the point of how much the US emphasizes the aircraft carrier in our military doctrine.
The number of nations small and poor enough to not be able to sink an aircraft carrier is rapidly shrinking. Against any sizeable opponent (say Iran or North Korea) these things are just very expensive targets the US wont't dare to place within 1000km of the country it attacks, which renders them useless.
10th like
You're right, LHA's and LPH's fall into the Amphibious Warfare Category.
Appreciate you highlighting the Army's air components and how big they are. The Army also has a massive surface fleet of boats to (working with the Navy) carry Army infantry soldiers, armor, vehicles, and equipment across seas or littorals. In media, spec ops like Rangers, or even conventional units like Marines, get more attention than the Army or even Army infantry, but the Army is still the backbone of America's military might and does the bulk of the ground combat in any significant conflict.
I'm not sure if You mentioned it, but shout out to the original animations of each countries "intro" would be cool. You know, the one You guys clearly recreated with your own style.
nah, no thanks
They stole it off of mitsi studios cause they are dry on ideas
finally somebody said it! i thought i was having deja vu or something, credits to Mitsi Studios!@@circle2121
@@circle2121 thats not stealing they made it with there own style
@@KhanzadaGaming03 The intro to when nations are introduced is identical to Mitsi Studio's "How countries fight wars" part 1 and 2, so think again buddy
I honestly think that the Vietnamese military could benefit from using tunnel systems. It could really throw off enemy armies.
Edit: Those tunnels would probably just cause minor inconvenience for soldiers. Same could probably be said for the booby-traps.
i think the bombs and radars and everything else we got would make them a lot less effective
Nowadays there are powerful bunker buster bombs that can penetrate deepest tunnels
@@CCP-Lies$500 tunnel housing dudes in flip flops and rusted ak47 vs $1,000,000 bunker busters. That's not economical at all.
@@user-hr849gfj7udj7hdh for the US, it's not a problem
Sponge bombs now plus god knows what else. You think the US just sat around after that problem and didn't think of some things?
Part 2 please!
Expecting for part 2
"There cant be a balloon in the sky if there is no sky" - America probably
In the US we also utilize small and fast moving squadrons butt with the help of overwhelming power if necessary otherwise the squadrons would help themselves
5th like
Nice World at war reference 13:22
please do a video on these
(this is a copy and paste list for a few channels)
units and tactics/evaluation of loadouts of troops (from different jobs (and other branches)
like the 82 snd 101 airborne units
or infantry tank units, (or when tanks were assigned a infantry unit like i think earlier war Russia then all tanks were formed into there own units wich meant the infantry no longer knew the true strength of there own tanks but alowed tank units to fight more efficiently)
the tank doctrine of countries
evaluation of tank veiw ports
evaluation of tanks/armored vehicles of different countries
evaluation of aircraft types of different countries,
different between navil and army/air force fighters
logistics units of the axes and allied powers in ww2
ww1 estern front tactics
Russian Civil war tactics and strategies
navil ship cross sections (all the rooms and how it all works)
evaluation of types of ships
or evaluation of navil warfare
air craft carrier strike group formations exsamples (from different countries)
ancient persan ships,
ancient veneti ships (gauls that fought ceaser)
ships used by genoa and the vernesain republic
the vernesain republic government
all sailing ships, (i know theres many on yt but some contradict each other and i think theres more left out)
cast vs welded vs rivited tank armor
2b9 vasilyok morter
tactics used so far in the Ukraine war,
better for squads to be 2 teams of 5 or 3 teams of 3,
and probably the easiest, better to keep troops well feed or starved like an animal
how dose age effect comsnders eg napoleon got older so took less risks,
ancient urban warfare
ww2 tactics in Asia, tactics in the Chinese age of warlords, (and Chinese civil war)
tactics in the ruso jap war
cold war navil tactics,
Korean war tactics,
strange tactics or unque battles from the American war of independence and America civil war
how were 17th centry sailing ships build
types of bombs lunched by drones
comands given on sailing ships (like ease the sheets and get ready to chine, or slack n beases, basically things you hear movie capitns say)
why did the nazis never return (or a video on best occupations)
why did the Japanese empire fall, dont just say "America" like things like how there army and navy argued alot
alot more on the Polynesians and māori, but please learn pronounceations if you do this
Can you make a simple history video of the Sino-Vietnamese War (the 3rd Indochina War)? Not a lot is covered in that war compared to the 1st and 2nd Indochina Wars.
Lịch sử đơn giản là trung quốc và Mỹ bắt tay nhau tấn công Việt Nam
Love simple history!
Bro really did USA dirty at 1:15 💀
Why ? That's exactly how the US conducts itself.
They bring a bazooka to kill a fly.
This video is like a more in-depth version of Mitsi Studio's "How Countries Fight Their Wars" videos.
Let's go simple history and Sometime I'm going to get a video on the same second it releases 8 hours ago that's the earliest I've got on simple history I think
we need other videos like this !
United States: "I'm more like 50 war tribes in a trench coat with a defense budget big enough to fight God"
Afganistan 🤣😂😂😂😂😂
this is a lot like the video that mitzi studio made but more deeply explained
I live this channel ❤
Let's be honest, During the Korean War,
1.compared with the Chinese army, 12 countries United Nations army had 30 years advanced weapons and 10 times the firepower and ammunition.
2. The Chinese army has very less tanks, no aircraft, no artillery. But UN army had them
3. The Chinese army wore thin clothes in the winter and had insufficient food supplies. Many soldiers died of freezing and starvation.
But China still win Korean War with death ratio 1.2 : 1 to UN army
ok i biased
a bit too much
Well not quite right, key thing is that China fielded 300k in a short time. After UN troops were already fighting north Koreans for 2 years.
China's initial purpose was to maintain the 38th parallel north. China warned the United States not to cross the 38th parallel enter North Korean, but the United States refused to listen and was pushed back at the Chinese border.
Vietnam War, China warned the United States not to enter North Vietnam, because of the lessons of the Korean War, this time the United States obeyed China's orders
Maybe the real _nation at war_ is all the friends we made along the way.
Saw the Vietnam thumbnail, and I unironically bumped into an article on the disguises of Vietnamese rangers in modern times in 2 minutes, and for some reasons, one of the picture having them jumping through a fire loop.
I mean, I'm a Vietnamese, but the coincidence.
Bn đang bắt chước cách ghi của họ 😂😂😂
Its called three-three technic which a platoon of solders can fill the whole hill, not the human waves like the Battle of Verdun (meat grinder). Three solders form a battle team, then three battle teams form a small battle group. Supersession fires are not effective again the battle group. Also, certain division of Chinese solider were fight under different banners in the revaluation war and performed very poorly. Once they swapped the banner and fighting the invaders for the nation, they became fiercesome and earned reputation in the battles.
Mitzi studios did this. Yours is just narrated and detailed.
I think Mitsi Studio and Simple History are gonna get alomg just fine
I was about to say the same thing.
I don't think so. Simple History is much less biased.
Romania: maybe performs poorly then switches sides
This is a genius tactic and strategy and I like strategy and tactics so you gave me a idea to win a war
Everyone is talking about the Mitsi Studio video. Its in the description as inspired by the Mitsi Studio video.
I love how they took "Inspiration" from mitzi studios there is a reason why the "inspiration" is in air quoats
glad im not the only one who noticed. There's decent content on this channel but damn can it be clickbaity and too much on the meme-ish side.
Ну странный обзор.
Не упомянута одна из самых сильных сторон американцев - высокая подготовка сержантского и младшего офицерского состава .
"Human wave" это не китайское изобретение и к Сун Цзы не относится, а английское, Первой Мировой Войны. К китайцам попала через адаптацию к японской тактики. И осуществлялась иначе - это были несколько ложных атак с ложными отступлениями, в ходе которых китайцы не брезговали притворяться мертвыми. И когда вскрывались все огневые точки обороняющихся, происходило огневое подавление их и атака.
Атлантический Вал - это агония немецкой тактики, а не вершина. Вершина - это блицкриг во Франции и прорыв к Москве. Первый раз что-то против блицкрига смогли придумать при обороне Киева, а окончательно сломали в Битве за Москву. Самое уязвимая часть блицкрига - это отрыв частей прорыва от тылов, именно в эту щель, как в зазор между чешуйками дракона и вонзили Жуков и Тимошенко ударное копье танковых дивизий Ватутина.
Ну и наконец, основа русской и советской тактики - это в первую очередь сочетание скорострельной и дпюальнобойной артиллерии на поле боя, создающей огневой вал перед наступающими и обороняющимся. Если у немцев тылы врага кошмарила авиация,рубежи атаки обстреливала гаубицы, танки ждали на прямой наводке, а вблизи встречали многочисленные пулеметы пехоты, то русская атака на дальню диснации начинала с 152 мм, на средней били 122 мм, на прямой наводке 76 мм работали там где у других уже был пулемет, и под таким огневым валом пехота с криком "ура" врывалась во вражеские окопы, огневой вал переносился на следующую линию окопов, а бойцы, вооруженные скорострельными ППШ (1000 выстрелов в минуту, калибр 7.62) в коротких схватках или врукопашную уничтожали врага (ППШ весит 4.5 килограмма, в руках какого-нибудь двухметрового сибиряка или Балтийского матроса даже без патронов можно ломать правильные арийских черепа в штальхельмах)
Самая важная богатырская наша сила - это умение красиво скоммуниздить что-нибудь хорошее, доработать напильником и умело применить против оппонентов. Началось ещё с периода образования государства, успешно сработало во времена татаро-монгольского ига и так и продолжается до сих пор. Касательно того же блицкрига - как только его вскрыли и научились ему противостоять, тут же начали его применять с ещё большим успехом, применяли излюбленную немецкую тактику окружений, постоянно наращивали темпы механизации армии по примеру Вермахта. А настоящим блицкригом заткнули немцев за пояс во время Манчжурской операции против Квантунской армии.
Need to do Britain and the individual commonwealth states next. Maybe Rhodesias fireforce would be a good one aswell
Can you make a part 2 i would like to see more
Я ВАС ОБОЖАЮ. ВЫ ПЕРВЫЕ КТО ГОВОРИТ ПРАВДУ О ВЕЛИКОЙ ОТЕЧЕСТВЕННОЙ ВОЙНЕ НА ЗАРУБЕЖНОМ ЮТУБЕ
Я бы сказал, что автор в основном рассказывает о военных доктринах, разных стран. К примеру он взял такие конфликты, как вторая мировая война, война за объедение Китая и некоторые современные конфликты, что произошли не так давно. Но информация была подана объективно, что не вызывает никаких сомнений в её достоверности.
@@adbler6602 ну просто хорошо что автор в этом плане объективен
Лучше пускай иностранцы думают, что русские умеют только бегать на штыки с одной винтовкой на троих. Нам же проще будет их уничтожать, когда начнется очередная глобальная мясорубка.
Hey @simpkehistory I think you made a mistake at 5:51 showing British soldiers having German G98 guns.
the intro of each country on a small platform reminds me of the video by mitsi studios
"Its all fun games until the trees start speaking vietnamese"💀
So basically, the US can drop about 4 carriers and about 4000 aircraft, and we are STILL on top.
My tax payment would LOVE that.
Not for long. China is quickly catching up.
I swear this was at least partially inspired by Mitsi Studios' "How Countries Fight Wars" animations
10th like
4:20 i thought he said he said "*cowardly,* the majority of US Force work in logistics, not active combat." Had to turn on subtitles to see that he said "currently" lmao.
This video is literally an animated straight up copy of Misti studios‘ „How Countries Fight Their Wars“
For the first time in these videos someone explained the details behind all these stereotypes about the Soviets! Great rep to the author!
The British: Are we a joke to you?
The british use the same tactic as americans and you will understand why
@@UxhatUs
Pretty similar to America, except the stereotype says the British relies more on the Royal Navy than the Americans relies on the Air Force.
@@dylanbilson4271ok
" when the sky speaks american, the forest must speak vietnamese"
- ho chi minh
As a Russian, I will add about the army of our country. Yes, we do not have such technological and advanced equipment and weapons as the United States, but nevertheless, its difference from American equipment and weapons lies in its simplicity, reliability and mass production, which allows us to quickly and efficiently service weapons and equipment, as well as produce them in large quantities. We are a simple people, and our tools should be the same - simple and effective. We also use a huge number of artillery guns, which allows us to replenish the enemy's manpower. The reliability and mass availability of equipment, huge firepower, as well as a huge number of soldiers ready to die for the Motherland - all this was reflected in the main tactics of the Russian army: suppressing the enemy with the density of fire. It is worth saying that the Russian army relies not on quick and accurate maneuvers, but on the destruction of the enemy with strong blows of an iron fist. Thus, thanks to the above factors, the Russian army is capable of waging protracted wars.
Therefore, if you come to imagine an image that personifies the Russian army, then imagine a massive and stubborn and armored giant, who, walking slowly, sweeps away all obstacles on his way to the goal, and who can hardly be stopped.
thank you holywhood and usa for speading so much b-s in our minds with your huge movie production.
When one imagines the USA going to war they immediately think of friendly fire incidents 😂
Obviously not funny when lives are lost tho. Apologies for offending anyone.
You mispelled russia
@@laernulienlaernulienlaernu8953 it sounds like people don't really think at all then, as compared to the British, the US friendly fire rate is considerably lower.
@@DirtyMikeandTheBoys69 it was a joke. Friendly fire, as terrible as it is, is just an unfortunate accident and if soldiers die I bet the ones who were responsible live with the guilt for the rest of their lives.
Unfortunately, that's one of the many sad things about war. 👍
@@laernulienlaernulienlaernu8953 joke or not, it's a very real idea among the British that the Americans are out to get them, when the reality is they have a statistically higher chance being taken out by their own than the Americans.
Nice touch with the paratrooper Vespas
Nice video
Mitsi studios anyone?
As far as I know, mitsi studio is just cute, funny art. This was actually informative
Russia's current tactics does in fact involve human wave tactics.
Evident from the ukraine war!
Sometimes the soldiers aren't even well equipped!!
@@omygod8637, Russia's tactic in the Ukraine war is just camping.
Yes, but it's usually Storm-Z, criminals conscripted from prisons. Their service conditions are basically "survive this, and we'll let you walk away with a pardon". Normal draftees and the career military is busy entrenching themselves and camping.
Это не так. Если посмотреть по внимательнее, то увидишь что воюют в основном малыми группами.
source: Ukrainian government
why are you lying? Where is evidence or logic behind your clam???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
I appreciate your appreciation for France. Kudos also for showing a French tank turretvrepurposed as a German WW11 defensive bunker.
The rest of the countries: historical examples of the application of specific strategies, real facts. USA: I have a lot of money, so TRUST ME, if necessary, I can beat anyone, 100%
“War! Oooh, yeah! What is it good for absolutely nothing?” Edwin Starr
United Kingdom: Britain is a fortress and we have the largest fleet in the world. We have nothing to fear.
Ever heard about planes?
Brittany is an island just good for invading countries where no army awaits them, just kangaroos and penguins
@@bramijdema759Ever heard of the battle of Britain?
Largest Fleet of what? China has the largest naval fleet, then russia, north korea, and the US.
Had*
0:28
5:07
7:46
10:39
14:05
17:10
I lobe your videos man, do Britain PLEASE
I love USA.
Agreed.
The best offense is fast and unstoppable, the best defense is immovable and build to withstand the entire world at once.
"Chao Ling takes power"
"257 million perish"
First off great as always. One question about Russia/USSR how does the current Uko-Russo war change that opinion what factoring in the Story Z units. Captives tell they were sent out with one or two mags some water and that's about it. That seems to me to be analogous to a meat assault, just waves with little intend but to waste the other side's ammo stockpiles.
First, not everything a captive says on the camera is factual truth. Especially when at mercy of those who don't even consider that captive a human being.
Second, reports of Russian troops having way too few supplies in the early stage of war are true, but stem from an entirely opposite reason: strategists at Kremlin didn't expect to face resistance. It was meant to be over in just a few days, with government in Kiev intimidated into signing whatever Russia proposes them to sign.
Outrageous naivety with catastrophic consequences.
@@user-co3uc8vt7ei would disagree, they had plenty ammo and supplies
It’s just when they came in a faced resistance, lack of proper command structure completely ruined the whole op
They broke in, had Kiev in a semi circle but after that it was a now what situation and command was lacking
@@Radbot776
Because the initial battle plan didn't include taking of Kiev, as far as I can conclude.
They exist some videos where "russian soldirs" talk how they was used as storm Z tropps but some videos was proved as fake because russians find the social media accounts of the soldirs and they was ukraniens. If we talk about all the storm z tropps did they have an 20% death rate (source prigozihin) also compared to the ukranian prisoners did u hear after 2 months nothing anymore of them what obviously is clear they all dead
@@Radbot776what semi circle? They dropped 4 thousand vdv troops into the whole kiev region. And that was done so that huge mass that was frontlining the donbass would pull back. It’s called a fake out
I believe that it is impossible to conquer Russia by conventional means. Germany came closest, but was defeated because they were outnumbered, and suffered from ramshackle logistics system. But unless you're prepared to use WMDs Russia will win in the end.
No they wont . Germany lost cause they were fighting multiple other nations and because hitler ignored his generals advice.
I heard it was more that hitler wanted to capture oil in Kiev and his army wanted to go for Moscow but hitler ultimately decided.(wrongly)
Germany had bigger numbers and good logistics at first. Later on, their numbers dropped and logistics fell apart because of lack of oil and too many different machine parts
@@ollyx2they would have still lost either way, they just didn't have the resources
Even though it might be difficult to make, i would like to see one of this video with spain, for example in the midle ages
I love the old style...
Nostalgia 😢
Germany : Blitzkrieg - Vietnam : In the Trees - America : Explosions Galore - Russia : Human Waves - China : Also Human Waves
Pretty much.
France - retreating
And France 🏳️ 😂
Russian is HIGH QUALITY human waves.
@@GameprojordanAverage Virgin Cringe Brainless Fatherless Anti France Troll Fanboy taking Copium over here ⬆️
Simple history: Dont bully the french,there the best!
Also Simple History: lets put a french a surrender flag,idfc if they get mad
Edit: I liked my comment lolol
it’s to show the stereotype bro no way you missed the point
germany: outlasts you with sheer firepower
vietnam: crawls out of a pringles can "DID YOU FORGET ABOUT ME?!" rapid AKM fire noises
Russian Air Force is big, but when your most modern fighter jet is the Sukhoi fifty seven built in the seventies…..
You aren't going to be first, im stopping all the same of your kind to be first
2nd
Bro nobody actually cares about being 1st this isn't kindergarten grow up
@@Bandyboo322 fr
that trend is becoming annoying & needy quickly. Some are so needy they ask to be pinned 🙄😮💨
@@Bandyboo322 well, you never can be too sure
The last time France ever won against a near peer adversary was 200 years ago.
WW1 was not 200 years ago.
@@thibaultsardet7399 france didn't win ww 1.
@@MrErdem95 Of course they did...
"The Victory of the Entente in 1918 is the Triumph of the French trucks over the German railways " _ Erich Ludendorff.
" Without the French army, Germany would have been victorious"_ Kaiser Wilhelm II.
@@thibaultsardet7399 Entire world ganged up on them but they still held on for 4 years on French soil. It was not a French victory at all.
@@MrErdem95 France or not, Germany was just only on the defensive after the failure of the spring offensive. It was a matter of time before they broke.
Multiples coalitions were formed against France in Absolutism Age, or Revolutionnary and Napoleonic periods, so in your logic, no one won the last two coalition Wars between 1813 and 1815, because they ganged up ?