Ghazwah al-Hind In The End Times Pt. 2 (Q&A)
Vložit
- čas přidán 10. 05. 2019
- This is Sheikh Imran's first lecture devoted to this topic. He shares his preliminary comments heralding a warning to Pakistan Muslims who believe in the hadith of Gazwatul-Hind to be true.
!["Palestinian leadership are not interested in peace with this country-[only] replacing this country"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cjBa0ot3rpM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
Ram Mohan Roy studied the Vedas and found therein One God. He went on to establish the Brahmo Samaj Movement in Hinduism. The duty of a scholar of the Qur'an is to locate such Truth in the Hindu scriptures and to gently direct the Hindu to the Truth that is already in his scriptures - and is also in the Qur'an. When he does that, it would facilitate eventual Hindu recognition of Truth in the Qur'an and also facilitate the consequent inevitable recognition of Prophet Muhammad as a Prophet of that One True God.
If a Hindu, Christian or Jew chooses to recognize Truth in the Qur'an, and to also recognize Prophet Muhammad as a Prophet of the One God, but chooses to remain identified as Hindu, Christian or Jew, and to follow a sacred law other than that revealed to the Prophet, it is Allah Most High Who will judge him - and not those who follow the Prophet. INH
Prove ur point from the Qur'an , I m ashamed a traditional Muslim scholar can say these words.
السلام وعليكم فضيلة الشيخ لغتي الإنجليزية متوسطة وغيري الكثير من متابعينك لغتهم الإنجليزية متوسطة ، يرجى إضافة الترجمة العربية في المحاضرات القادمة ، فضلاً وليس امراً .
Sheikh Imran Hosein
What a load of rubbish
@@piyushjaiswal9283 who told you lol, you all claim to be Indian by birth and ram born there and you claim that your so called shiv ling is in India , then don't claim your Indian by birth. By the way the hajr e Aswad is a rock from heaven stated in quran which was brought down by angles, don't believe in stories.
Vedas emphasis on an absolute an ultra monotheistic faith which is the most ancient of any religion ever existed on earth. In Vedic religion (Sanatan Dharma) there is no concept of Angels, prophet and demons. Ishwar (God) is all powerful and doesn't need the assistance of angels and prophets etc. We believe that the revelation are eternal, comes in the very beginning of the mankind and never change. Whereas in islam god's word keep changing the respect of time and from one prophet to another which is blasphemous belief.
May Allah bless you sheikh. If we had 5 scholars like you in the world today Islam would be in a way better shape and all fabrications against us would easily be unraveled. But as you often say they're all busy fighting over chicken feet.
It is quite possible that an India-Pakistan war will soon break out. I am doing all that I can to try to prevent such a war at this time; but Ghazwah al-Hind school-boys who cannot see beyond their noses, seem anxious for such a war. It is the same confused and deficient thinking which led them to disaster with their bogus Jihad in Syria. It matters not whether India launches an attack on Pakistan, or whether a 5th column in Pakistan provokes such a war, the stark reality is that Pakistan will have to fight alone with none to support her. The MBS shoe-shine school-boys who now rule over Pakistan have ensured that Iran will not intervene in such a war to assist Pakistan. In addition, China will not intervene unless Russia also intervenes, and Russia will never intervene in such a war. How long will Pakistan last before it is overwhelmed? Will Allah intervene to save the IMF Republic of Pakistan? INH
Sheikh you called 2 hadiths of Sunan al Nasai weak even though they are marked saheeh by sheikh Hajar al-‘Asqalani and reason you gave for considering them weak is that king is mentioned and there are no kings in India today. I don't think you are consistent with your own methodology in this matter. All your life you interpreted these hadiths as symbolic whether it was mountain of gold or interpreting donkey with ears stretched out as fighter air craft but when it comes to this hadith you expect prophet pbuh to literally mention prime minister. I believe you are inconsistent.
P.S. I respect you and I agree with 95% of things you preach. Please correct me. I want to get corrected cos right now I find your position to be untenable and this has never happened before. I've always found all your arguments to be bullet proof.
Sheikh I also think it was a symbolic hadith as you know at the time of Rasool(ASW) there was no prime minister or president's so may be he(SAW) is talking about the Ruler cox there are may name and types for ruling and rulers one of them is King...
There is no reason whatsoever to take Ghazwa-e-Hind hadith literally, none! Just like there is no reason to take hadith of Khalifa dying and three sons fighting over succession literally. Ghazwa-e-hind hadith does mention that Allah swt will forgive the sin of that army, which implies prior to Ghazawa-e-hind that army will have engaged in sinful activity, as no one is free from sin. You have to have peanuts in your head and living in Disney Land to not see the hatred exhibited for Muslims in genocide of Gujrat and systematic relentless oppression of Kashmir and recent events under current Hindutva regime. Giving one off emotional Disney land stories is not going to stop the rise of Hindutva ideology which is a sister ideology to Zionism. They are two side of the same coion! Referring to Syed Hussain Ahmed Madni as "people who knew Islam and lived Islam" whilst these very men were propagating the notion that nations are formed on the basis of geographical boundaries and not on the basis of fraternity of faith in One God and believing in his messenger pbuh is laughable! One just need to see latest statements coming from Dr. Farooq Abdullah who has just realized the mistake of the so "called people who knew Islam and lived Islam". Could the Sheikh tell us on which Byzantinian emperor's invitation did the companion of the prophet pbuh Abu Ayub al-Ansari (Ra) fought against Constantinople alongside other companions of the prophet pbuh and eventually became martyr in the battle? There was no invitation by Byzantinian emperor or its people that would justify the companion of the Prophet pbuh, Abu Ayub al Ansari (Ra) from engaging in a war against Byzantine. Abu Ayub al Ansrari (Ra) was not the only companion of the prophet there were others and individuals from the second generation as well. Nor was there any attack by Byzantine Empire on Ummayad Empire to warrant an Umayad attack on Constantinople. What the Ottomans did was no different than what the Ummayad did before them! If we go by Sheikh’s analysis there can be only two possibilities or conclusions, either Abu Ayub al Ansari (Ra) and others naoozabillah violated the command of Allah swt and hence cast doubts on the teacher himself, the Prophet pbuh, that he failed to teach deen to his companion naoozabillah. Or the explanation & understanding of Quran given by Sheikh is grossly incorrect & inadequate as it has gaping holes and doesn’t fit in a harmonious whole like Sheikh believes.
Regards,
Your humble school boy student who cant see past his nose!
@@sikanderamin6096 exactly!
I don't know why Sheikh ignores this type of questions which checkmate his methodology!
May Allah swt bless you brother imran I’m a BIG FAN of you,your knowledge is beautiful and on point I think 🤔......I pray that you stay in good health and deliver more knowledge to the ummah....Ameen
I'm from India I'm watching this video after the passing of bill against Muslims the CAA and NRC ....😰 tensions were there.... India is protesting daily......may Allah azzwajal save us from the protection
One saint in india tells us to learn the prayers as much as possible...because the time is coming when the religious books will remains in very less number...and only those will be saved who loves the God from the deep of the heart and always acts in the will of the form less, birth less God...others will be washed out either they are muslims, hindus, cristians, sikhs, etc
Imran hosein has a PHD in allegorical understanding of hadiths and yet here he is interpreting them literally. By King, it also means a prime minister, a president, a mayor and so forth.
This hadith says after the conquest of india as the mujahideen will be returning to their homes, they will hear the news that Hazrat Isa has returned and then they will head in the direction of Syria.
This means it is referring to end times. The conquest of Hind means the conquest of the parts that are in current India. So Sh. Imran hosein's explanation is not correct.
It refers to "kings"- multiple rulers of multiple states. India is one unified entity under one prime minister.
Yet their Kings are falling apart in 6 years democratic elections where is King Manmohan Singh now .....I think seheik settled this ..... This hadees if fabrication based ......
I felt the same bro. There s one hadith which talks about khalifa fights for treasure before Imam mahdi. There he translated khalifa as saudi king. 😄
If his adopted father chose for this mighty minded man to go to England to study Law then what a stupendous Lawyer he would have been.
Dear Imran,
I'm from Pakistan and i understand your points that:
why Pakistan don't have Islamic Law and at the current time instead spreading hates againt hindu and Christian, we should be peaceful. And yes i agree with you pakistan should be led by a Muslim not secular but in Pakistan more than 90% people want Islamic law but there are liberals even if they are very few but they're leading the country. Why because of the ulma e islam who taught the people that don't study science etc because it's kufr to study which leaves majority of muslims behind very few liberals.
And I'm also agree with the other point that we shouldn't act hateful because if we follow your point we'll defeat our enemies in proxy war and upcoming war which is being fought on the name of terrorism.
1 request I've do not only criticize but also provide the solutions for Pakistan's people what they should do. think of the people of Pakistan not govt.
Thanks and please continue interpreting Quran and guiding us.
ALLAH may bless u
I absolutely love The Sheikhs passion and enthusiasm!
*Had India been a democracy where people had the right to get what was their right,Indian Occupied Kashmir would be free from its oppression.India has effectively a Kingship disguised as **democracy.To** me this is what the Hadith refers to.*
ASC sheikh Imran well respected may Allah Grant you jannatul fardoos you deliver your messages in diin may Allah reward s inshallah
The alleged Hadith spoke about the Kings of Hind being dragged to Jerusalem after the Muslim conquest of Hind. India, today, has only one King, i.e., the Prime Minister. There are no other Kings in India. If the alleged prophecy is to be applied to modern-day India, to the exclusion of the rest of ancient Hind, then the unitary State of India has to first be broken up into several States with a multiplicity of Kings. It is remarkable how this alleged Hadith has succeeded in transporting so many schoolboys to dreamland. INH
.
Sheikh I can clearly see the wisdom behind what you are doing here with the hadith looking at the current situation and the enormous disaster that is awaiting us if a war broke out between India and Pakistan. It is so obvious you're trying to de escalate that situation in any way possible. Sometimes we have to look at the hints that you give in your lectures and follow them until the right time comes. I have seen your so many lectures where you were hinting and then years later you would reveal the truth when the time was right. I am just surprised why some people even after listening to 1000s of your lectures cant understand that.
REMARKABLE IS THE HADEES SHEIKH JUST WAIT SOON YOU WILL SEE END OF SO CALLED DEMOCRACY IN INDIA AND YOU WILL SOON SEE HINDU INDIA WITH A KING READ ABOUT R S S AND THERE AGENDA AND THERE PLANNING STARTED FROM 1924
The present day situation of India may be correcting this hadith as kings may be it is the raising of hindu radicalism in india.
With due reapect i would like to disagree sir as even of now the geographical hind in the times of Prophet PBUH is not a single entity. India, Nepal, Sri lanka, Bhutan, Burma are already having their own seprate rulers, which were once part of the Hind. So saying Hind only has one ruler seems quite not right. Wallah hu Alam u bis sawaab.
Because it's easier to beat the drums of Ghazwa e hind rather than reform ourselves and be the truthful, respected, integrated, honest people that we were meant to Be! That requires hard work! And this on the contrary requires lip service. The ummah which does not join the imam at fajr , zuhr, asr, maghrib and Isha dreams to join an army from Hind to Jerusalem!
Lots of respect PPL like you can take the religion ahead on rightous. Path . War will lead to own destruction
If u kill a person only on doubt of eating cows meat What u ll get in return? A flower or A slap? I m not explaining no U better understand
*FIRST TO COMMENT TODAY.*
*#LOVE** & **#RESPECT** FOR SHEIKH SAHAB FROM **#INDIA**.*
*I HAVE BEEN STUDYING THESE SUBJECTS ALONE BUT NOW I WISH TO GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU.. PLEASE LEG ME KNOW HOW DO I CONTACT YOU TO STUDY FURTHER.*
Dear Teacher Imran , sometimes it seems that you bypass the methodology of the study of the Quran and Sunnah by taking a verse in isolation etc. You spoke about the leadership of All India Muslim League that they were Secular , but Muhammad Ali Jinnah said we already have our Constitution i.e. the Quran , he was not Secular , he was a great man indeed. But this is not necessary that you accept our view , you can differ with us.
I think you shouldn't think that you are the only man who can interpret the Quran and Sunnah better than any other person in this Dunya. Different people have different expertise. You may be a very knowledgeable person in eschatology but this doesn't mean if you are not able to see something and not able to understand the historical process then that thing is wrong & obsolete.
Pakistan isn't created without any purpose , when it came into being the father of the nation died and Liaquat Ali Khan was killed and power went into the hands of people who were not sincere despite the fact that they passed a resolution called قرارداد مقاصد saying Allah is the supreme ruler and only Allah is الملک & الحکم. But unfortunately they were not sincere and british parliamentary system of government took control which is based on شرک. This is a historical process , Allah in his wisdom wants to make the things clear and to separate the truth from falsehood. Now the people of Pakistan understand that this system based on شرک has failed and is against the foundation of Pakistan.
What I see & others who see with internal eyes with Allah's Grace is that soon this system of british parliamentary democracy will end & will be toppled. And in its place a God fearing & just person بإذن اللة تعالى will take control and will establish the rule of Quran & Sunnah إنشاء الله.
They will also offer peace to all the nation's and they will offer all the nuclear states in this world including Hindus that we need to roll back and destroy / finish our nuclear programs to save the world from nuclear catastrophe but all of them including Hindus won't care and listen to them. This is indeed a historical process. Now you don't ask me a proof that how come I know about that , because I'll say that this is indeed a very great blessing of Allah ( SWT ) which I don't consider myself deserving.
Islam is against wars i.e. purposeless wars and I also think that what Mughals and Ottomons done was against the wishes of Allah and the Quran & Sunnah of our Prophet ( Alaih E Salam ) but was it right for Russians to wage a war against the Muslims of Central Asia and to impose an oppressive rule on them without their wishes.
Is it ok for the Mushrikeen مشرکین of هند to wage a relentless war against the innocent Kashmiris and killing innocent people of Kashmir including women and children and elderly people and raping our sisters in Kashmir. Is it ok that they kept 800 thousand armed forces to oppress the people of Kashmir.
By the way according to Moodi & BJP cow is more sacred than a human being in India when they kill innocent Muslims simply on the suspicion of keeping beef in his refrigerator when actually it was mutton and not beef. & they killed more than 2000 defenseless Muslims in Gujarat India. This is what the Quran speaks about the people who have most hatred towards the people of Islam and Allah knows best.
Brother what you are saying is true.
But how come Allah help a Muslim nation which doesnot care and impose the deen and has interest based economy and no sharia law.
What i think is this ghazwa e hind will be after malhama when Pakistan wont even exist as a state and it will a guerilla warfare.
And hind like sheikh said doesnot mean only hindus
Being a pakistani i belive there will be a ruler who will amerge as a pure islamic leader some say it could be imran khan or the next one after him
Imran khan was doing fine until he met imf now the nation is disappointed most of us want to get rid of this system based on (sood) interest .. Quaid said without the help of Nabi SAW it would not happened
27th of ramazan
And we are the only nation who's enemies are Yahudies and Mushriqs
Allah says in quran they cant be our friends
On 27th feb one pilot was indian other is fron isreal says alot
Internally what i am witnessing that pak ind war is on its way like a hindu pandit said if america lifts its army from afghanistan gazwa tul hind will begin..
They know more than us..
@@chersimerci1626 there was a sincere struggle during zia ul haqs time, after which benazir bhutto wanted to work on this during the end times of her political career and was assassinated, musharaf seriously disrupted pakistans progress by supporting US and causing sectarian violence. After military operations in pakistan were successful, now we wait for another attempt to fulfill karardaad e maqasid.
Haha..lol..bunch of idiots ...keep daydreaming
A person is either your brother in faith, or your equal in humanity.
#Hazrat #ImamAli 💞
Shiekh is definitely right about Pakistans love for money. And also the fact that Allah will not change the condition of people who are not prepared to change themselves. So there elected leader is a reflection of the majority of the population
Sheikh imran hosein can you please tell the answer of this question,(that if a muslim do extention in kalma e tayibah he will remain muslim or not?).Please I want answer quick.I will be more than happy if you answer me.
You said that Allah did not send this Ummah with a mission to RULE the world, but Quran does ask Allah's messenger SAW to to spread his Deen to all over the world until it is dominant (At-Tauba 9:33)
Sheikh I'm sorry but when you simply symbolise the saudi king as Khalifa, who'll die and so a conflict will emerge after his death, why don't you symbolise the Indian ruler as a king? It's not mentioned in a single hadith, but several times in different books of hadith told this event to be occurred...
Saudi Arabia is still a monarchy and has a royal family and king as it's officials. India doesn't.
dear maulana all hindus in India are not against muslims but only a few sects such as RSS. moguls ruled India considering India as their own land and they build structures and developed one of the best economic systems. India was called ' sone ki chidia'. it is the history written british to divide hindus and muslims caused this trouble.
i am not agree with the Hindu King statement in the first question. According to my though, King means here president or ruler of India.
bilal amjad stop sheikh ll be angry 😂 btw the truth is india is again moving towards Kingdom system cuz they Value cow more then Humans and humanity.
I think whoever has differ opinion with sheikh, should email his opinion to sheikh directly.
Kings could refer to as the ruler or the political leader, this may be a symbolic like other Ahadees where khalifa means the ruler...
Or more soo the cast system
Sheikh has been using symbolism for other hadith related to End Times, but choose to view this Hadith as Literal .. why?
I never said that the two Hadith in Nisai were weak. I said that they were fabricated. INH
Your argument however is weak. You said that the Hadith is fabricated because there is no kingship in India.
Yet you agree that the Hadith about 3 sons of a khalifa refers to a Saudi King, even though there is no Khalifa.
Your problem is that you seem to hate Muslim kingdoms such as the Ottoman Empire more than the Christian and Hindu kingdoms. Even though the Western scholars have admitted that religious freedom in the Ottoman Empire was better than Europe.
You seem to be losing your balance, even though the Ottoman Empire was not ruling 100% according to the Quran, it was still much much better than the non-Muslim lands, a fact that I challenge you to dispute.
As Salam sheik..here in India.. Narendra modi is defacto king and are doing attrocities
Shiekh at one point u said if india or america attack pakistan China wont defend pakistan until russia jumps in ...my point is what if America go through war with China first an at same time india n pakistan war starts too because the there is trade war going between China n america already
Sheikh you told that the hadith of ghazwat ul hind when nabi esa a.s returns is fabricated can u state that,is there the situation where in India the increasing of hindutva and radicalism gives results in dictato ship in further time ? It's my question
Sheikh, isnt it a ghazwa is the one in which nabi or imam take part himself. As in the end time imam mehdi will be leading 2 wars at a time which both has equal reward, so ghazea hind has to be in his time. Further another hadith has word sind and hind so sindh will also be conquered. Furher kitab al fitn its there that imam mehdi will send his cousine to lead black flags and that will conquer hind. So it has to be under imam mendi only.
Sheikh Sahab, Asool e Hadith is a huge branch of knowledge, you are giving your verdict of the "fabricated" Hadith (Naoozobillah) without using the basics of Asool e Hadith, instead you are just using your emotions. You are simple using the word, King, to negate a hadith, please tell us the arabic word used in the hadith and what are the several meanings that word entails. Just saying that there are no kings in India makes this hadith fabricated is such a far fetched proposition that it borders a lie. Please use some common sense and give the guidelines and principles on which you are giving out such a bold statement.
Ya Allah, give hidaaya to everyone and stop us misleading one another and if I am wrong, please forgive me.
Sheikh you do realise Jesus was a Muslim as per the Quran. So the followers of Jesus are Muslim.
this scholar is loveable,but in context of india , not satisfied much,,..if we cant decipher a hadith not necessarily mean its wrong, "'being a master of all is unacheivable,""
Thanks for the message of peace for India shekh.. May Allah bless you...
sheikh has spoken the harsh truth.
2002 Gujrat Holocaust.
@Rajesh M it was the strategy of politics in gujarat, first killed there own people then attacked others.
Regarding ghazwa e hind I would prefer orya maqbool Jan's explanation ..
Dear sheikh, tabligh jamaat teaches love and they teach people to understand about the seerah of prophet pbuh and sahaba r. A.
Y r u against them.
I request you to visit nizamuddin and meet sheik saad, just in ur research u hv missed the knowledge and talk of what u hear about tabligh jamaat.
This is the time for u to visit nizamuddin markaz bcos i feel ur view will change
Imran Hussain shb you could not understand the scenario considering ahadees for hind.
Giving mosques away for shirk
worshiping by Allah never
Quick to divert divert divert why? cause im a scholar. End of story. We the ummah will just stay dumb deaf and blind. May Allah protect us from ignorance and arrogance.
if sheikh is wrong he shouldn't mislead the ummah.ogher scholers should correct him and show him the right path!
Dear Shaikh whether Islam permitted to alliance with oppressor. You talk about Hindu. Shaikh you want understand the difference between Hindus and Hindutha movements {RSS, the Bhramins} these peoples use Hindu religion to oppress the Dalith (the indigenous people they lived in India before the Aryan migration) same way zionist use Jewish religion to oppress the palastine people. They hate Islam because of the Islams core values. Islam rejected any kind superiority amongst people by birth or by caste. They believe in caste system. That they created from the head of Brahma. As jews believed they are the chosen people
I agreed your views about Ottoman empire's unjustified war on orthodox Christians.
It is an altogether different matter if he can prove that these hadiths are fabrication
So wrong sheik, India is a kingdom :-), what happened to RELIGIOUS SYMBOLISM,
and there is no democracy in India,
Can a Hindu rss Majority country country elect a Christian PM?
You are contradicting yourself,
Kings as in dictators like modi..and Amit shah..
Big respect Sheikh....I love you....other people in that mosque are complete idiots and that black guy just wasted everyone's time.......should have edited him out
Dear Sheikh, I am not completely impressed by this lecture. You are my teacher and I learned a lot from you specially on the topic of Islamic Scatology, Islam and monetary system and you taught well those, but as you said even a teacher can be wrong therefore I think you are wrong here, by listening at your lecture it looks like you are justifying Indian acts and criticizing Pakistan’s strategy of counterpart. Can you please answer some of my questions?
1. You said that Gandhi reach Muslims for Khilafat movement than why Gandhi got out of the Khilifat Movement when it was at its peak? Don’t you think it was a strategy to sabotage the Khilifat Movement?
2. In recent conflict between Pakistan & India in February 2019 who acted reasonably?
3. Pakistan has announced that in this conflict Israel & USA were also helping India, If Pakistan is acting according to wishes of USA and Israel than why are they against Pakistan and want to destroy it?
4. You said that there are no kings in India now so this Hadees is fabricated right? If this is right than the Hadees of Dajjal riding on the donkey, gold mountain etc. shall also be wrong because there is no such donkey and no gold mountain? Don’t you think meaning of king in this Hadees could be the rulers of India like PM?
5. Do you think what Mughals did in India is a justification for what Indians are doing with the Muslims of India and the terrorism they are doing in Pakistan for last 18 years?
6. When Jihad becomes Faraz on Muslims? Don’t you think it is Faraz now because Indian army is killing innocent peoples of Kashmir? Or the Indians are doing right thing because Mughals did wrong with them?
7. Since January 2019 to date 10 or 11 Indian fighter jets are crashed out of which only 2 are shoot down by Pakistan with the help of Allah, rest are destroyed by Allah, 4 before the conflict and rest after conflict, don’t you think these crashes were the help of Allah for Pakistan and the warning signs by Allah to India that don’t do this?
See the population of Muslims in India vs Hindus in Pakistan u will come to reality . Thats not how God helps u .
I have noticed my times that you are really against Pakistan. Listened to your lectures many times and found u against Pakistan. Its not good sir. kindly dont mind what i am saying but its my own view. Sorry in advance
Sorry don't agree King might Mean pm here just like The mountain of gold !!!
Tabligh Jamath is a Wahabi Jamath.
sultan salahudeen how stupid you are. You don’t even know the difference between tablighi jamat and wahabi. How foolish are Biddati Barelvis are. 😂
@@FaisalAnsari-bf9il don't say every one biddati first know what your forefathers is as Same as yazid did.when iblis was leader of angles he was the one who worshiped allah swt for 60 crore years then when rejected to respect nabi Adam as he said he is made of soil( mazallah ) ,then you must know the consequences that you leader iblis has gone through you are also going to throwed in hell
@@FaisalAnsari-bf9il deobandi ,tabligi, wahabbi,salfi all are of only one akheeda , little kid come with your homework
Before Pakistan dreams of winning war against India first win a cricket match against India in world cup.
With all the respect, Shiekh this is not ur subject, there are holes in ur speech, ur r pretty good on gog and Magog, It's better to leave this subject,
Dear Teacher Imran , I would like to ask you a question as a student of yours but usually you don't answer such questions which are in disagreement with your interpretation of Quran & Sunnah , may be I'm wrong but I felt this thing when I asked questions & you ignored or may be you are busy enough to see comments on your videos.
My question is if the Hadees of غزوة الهند is fabricated which is not in my opinion. At the time of Prophet ( Alaih E Salam ) and ابو هريرة رضي اللة عنه , there were no Muslims in that part of the world , I mean this part of the world which is now comprised of India , Pakistan , Bangladesh & Afghanistan. There wasn't a single muslim in that region then how come the Prophet ( Alaih E Salam ) predicted that there will be a غزوة and Jihad between the Muslims and Hindus and the Hindus will be defeated بإذن اللة تعالى. When all the people living in that part of the world were non muslims then there isn't even a point to speak about a Jihad between Muslims and Hindus but actually the Prophet ( Alaih E Salam ) knew that here in that part of the world people will accept Islam.
Will you please answer that how come the Hadees is fabricated , and if you symbolize a Khalifa to be the King of Saudi Arabia who'll die and then Mahdi ( Alaih E Salam ) will emerge , then why can't in another Hadees a PM of India can be symbolized as a King. The need of Religious Symbolism arises because the audience lived in an era in which they were not able to understand things about modern age properly and the Prophet ( Alaih E Salam ) spoke to them according to their understanding of the world and the physical things they can make image of in their minds , this is the reason Prophet ( Alaih E Salam ) symbolized Aircrafts as a Donkey with ears stretched wide enough as though wings of an Aircraft. Because the companions were able to make an image of a Donkey with ears stretched wide enough and in that case they memorized the Hadees. If the Prophet ( Alaih E Salam ) told them about the actual Aircrafts mechanical systems and seats and Petrol Engines they definitely would have forgot the Hadees and we the people living in the modern age wouldn't have been able to understand the things which we can now Alhamdolilah.
I hope you'll answer my question.
Muhammad Khalid salam aleykum brother, most of the predictions of prophet(s), for example he predicted about mobile , TV, Vehicles etc which was not present during his times. Same thing applies for Ghazwathul Hind. Thank you
Gajva a Pakistan or boluchistan ho raha2020 me 😋😋🇦🇫🇦🇫🇦🇫
Namak haram afghani suver
Tabligh jamaat people have ikhlas which no other organisation has. They do things to please Allah
لیبک غزوه هند
King argument is not valid... but hind is also pak and Bangladesh also those who takes loans from imf can't do it... this argument is still valid. ALLAH subanawatallah don't help these peoples.
Please stop saying ahadees from sahi bukhari and muslim as fabricated. In the times of prophet the only understanding of the reigns was by kings or rulers. So this could be a use of symbolism here in this hadeeth for the understanding of the common people then. Considering yourself 'aqal-e-qul' on such sensitive matters while making a conclusion can sometimes expel you from islam. Please sheikh be careful.
Obviously sitting in England how can you talk about Jihad?
Right
Sheikh imran hosein can you please tell the answer of this question,(that if a muslim do extention in kalma e tayibah he will remain muslim or not?).Please I want answer quick.I will be more than happy if you answer me.