Well stated: "The standard model is astoundingly successful, but clearly has major esthetic flaws: it has several moving parts, that are tenuously connected; several forces, several kinds of disconnected fermions; has many continuously adjustable parameters." "Some of these shortcoming may reflect pure 'enviornmental accidents', others may reflect selection bias (anthropic principle)." "In those conditions, it may be difficult to maintain the traditional high standards of theoretical physics; we might be reduced to accommodating facts as opposed to constructively explaining them. In particular, in the case of trying to determine the continuous parameters that appear in the standard model."
If R = 0 in Relativity and that is a mistake Einstein later admitted. If there is an Aether and NOT dark matter and energy, If it is a Plasma at different scales of energy in an electric model, you'll never get anywhere until you make an adjustment to by accepting a quantum plasma aether model.
As well as the simple fact the ether has been shown to be false, we now do have evidence of another scalar field it's called the Higgs field but it is has nowhere near the properties that were attributed to the scale field of the aether, they simply have been shown to be completely wrong.
R = 00 in non linear graphic time sections - Plasma scales trivalently when quantum plasma is directly proportional to the square root of the third trimester of nucleon synapsis.
QF could be Aether. However,the SINGLE probability wave function governing everything in the universe, is a good lead from QM, for what we might expect beyond the standard model and the collider physics. There will always a limit to the power of the colliders, that does not expose SUSY or the strings. The lecture did reveal interesting insights into physics beyond SM with interesting insights into black holes.
I remember when I went to a talk by Wilczek when I was an undergrad at MIT. He was more gung ho about supersymmetry than ever. I remained skeptical, but was truly excited by his claims. 5 years later, what has the LHC found? It appears that Garrett Lisi's bet that no SUSY would be found is correct. While Lisi had a TedTalk, most physicists ignored Lisi's work, mainly because he was a young graduate student himself when publishing important work. It baffles me how many high energy physicists are still looking for SUSY, even when it seems clear that they will not be found experimentally.
The standard model does not explain strings or the quantum field (QF), which seems more fundamental and is verifiable/observable (Cashmere effect). Beyond the SM the future seems to rest on QM and QC. The SINGLE probability wave function of QM,governing everything in the universe implies fundamental reality. It is just how we view this reality, that will give the next lead beyond SM. Physicists have not yet gotten around what the call 'observer's role' in QM. Here is a suggestion: Just like phase transition transforms non-life matter into life,due to self-organizing and self-simulating property of matter, similarly QF may provide a higher level of phase transition that self-simulates intelligent conscious 'observer', collapsing the field into fine tuned particles, leading to elements, molecules, organic compounds etc., that creates life and human consciousness, settling the Anthropic question. Man and god maybe entangled.
"Axions are almost forced to be an important component of the dark matter if they exist at all." According to Kroupa, dark matter particles are unlikely to exist - instead the dark matter problem seems to indicate that something is wrong with Newtonian-Einsteinian gravitational theory. Google "kroupa milgrom" for more information.
Fluid theory (Reproduction/Feed/Reasoning) decanted selfmultidimentionalover... The polydynamics of the movement generates pseudo-autonomy as material property, of the autogenous phenomenon; existing.(...) Simultaneous as my unidimensional variability... unidimensional variability = live-beings
Brilliant! TY for the post :)
Well stated:
"The standard model is astoundingly successful, but clearly has major esthetic flaws: it has several moving parts, that are tenuously connected; several forces, several kinds of disconnected fermions; has many continuously adjustable parameters."
"Some of these shortcoming may reflect pure 'enviornmental accidents', others may reflect selection bias (anthropic principle)."
"In those conditions, it may be difficult to maintain the traditional high standards of theoretical physics; we might be reduced to accommodating facts as opposed to constructively explaining them. In particular, in the case of trying to determine the continuous parameters that appear in the standard model."
Good one, Frank.
I simply love his nerdy humor.
His laughter at 2:45 is scary and frightening!
Mohammad Karaki what he was laughing ABOUT is even more frightening
I 💗SO(10)
Hard to keep up for a intermediate in particle physics but good talk.
If R = 0 in Relativity and that is a mistake Einstein later admitted. If there is an Aether and NOT dark matter and energy, If it is a Plasma at different scales of energy in an electric model, you'll never get anywhere until you make an adjustment to by accepting a quantum plasma aether model.
Yeah except we have proof why such a model is ludicrous, we do not see any monopoles....
As well as the simple fact the ether has been shown to be false, we now do have evidence of another scalar field it's called the Higgs field but it is has nowhere near the properties that were attributed to the scale field of the aether, they simply have been shown to be completely wrong.
R = 00 in non linear graphic time sections - Plasma scales trivalently when quantum plasma is directly proportional to the square root of the third trimester of nucleon synapsis.
QF could be Aether. However,the SINGLE probability wave function governing everything in the universe, is a good lead from QM, for what we might expect beyond the standard model and the collider physics. There will always a limit to the power of the colliders, that does not expose SUSY or the strings.
The lecture did reveal interesting insights into physics beyond SM with interesting insights into black holes.
What "part" of physics, i.e., what field of physics interests you the most? By the way, thanks for uploading these lectures.
Thanks for the comment! I'm interested in mathematical / theoretical high energy physics, which is exactly the content of this channel. :)
GraduatePhysics Awesome! Keep uploading these amazing lectures! Thanks a lot
Gas clouds can use Electricity to coalesce like dust bunnies, it doesn't have to be ONLY gravity as in relativity.
I remember when I went to a talk by Wilczek when I was an undergrad at MIT. He was more gung ho about supersymmetry than ever. I remained skeptical, but was truly excited by his claims. 5 years later, what has the LHC found? It appears that Garrett Lisi's bet that no SUSY would be found is correct. While Lisi had a TedTalk, most physicists ignored Lisi's work, mainly because he was a young graduate student himself when publishing important work. It baffles me how many high energy physicists are still looking for SUSY, even when it seems clear that they will not be found experimentally.
Even Sheldon Cooper could tell you super symmetry was bogus
And where's Lisi's theory now? Even he admits it has problems
Dang Witten, hogging the mic.
Witten went full autist at the end smh
I know it's not very important, but sometimes I think it would be a good idea if universities pleasured their guests with some wardrobe advice.
I only ask that they give free haircuts
The standard model does not explain strings or the quantum field (QF), which seems more fundamental and is verifiable/observable (Cashmere effect). Beyond the SM the future seems to rest on QM and QC.
The SINGLE probability wave function of QM,governing everything in the universe implies fundamental reality. It is just how we view this reality, that will give the next lead beyond SM.
Physicists have not yet gotten around what the call 'observer's role' in QM. Here is a suggestion:
Just like phase transition transforms non-life matter into life,due to self-organizing and self-simulating property of matter, similarly QF may provide a higher level of phase transition that self-simulates intelligent conscious 'observer', collapsing the field into fine tuned particles, leading to elements, molecules, organic compounds etc., that creates life and human consciousness, settling the Anthropic question.
Man and god maybe entangled.
"Axions are almost forced to be an important component of the dark matter if they exist at all." According to Kroupa, dark matter particles are unlikely to exist - instead the dark matter problem seems to indicate that something is wrong with Newtonian-Einsteinian gravitational theory. Google "kroupa milgrom" for more information.
Not necessarily, but an interesting thought to explore and make sure either way
Nobel Prize winning physicist spends 50 minutes expounding a theory, Witten BTFOs him in 5.
No he didn't, don't be a clown.
this guy is more painful to listen to than kip thorne... aaahhhheeetttt
The ''pain'' is well worth.
Fluid theory (Reproduction/Feed/Reasoning) decanted selfmultidimentionalover...
The polydynamics of the movement generates pseudo-autonomy as material property, of the autogenous phenomenon; existing.(...)
Simultaneous as my unidimensional variability...
unidimensional variability = live-beings