The Gospel of Peter (Akhmim)
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 04. 2013
- There are many ways you can help me to bring this message to the world. By subscribing to my channel, along with liking and sharing these videos, you are helping this channel to grow.
SUBSCRIBE HERE: / apocryphile1970
My book, The Super Gospel, A Harmony of Ancient Gospels, is available for purchase below. This is not a work of fiction, but a genuine Gospel harmony, comprised of over a hundred ancient Christian sources, laid out in chronological order from the history of Jesus’ parents all the way through his post-resurrection teachings and ascension. The mere fact that it can be done at all is momentous. The fact that it can be made to be so beautiful and fascinating and intricate is a testament to the pure genius of God. A link to the full version, compiled, integrated and read by myself, is available here for your listening pleasure: • The Super Gospel, by R...
I also make the pdf available for free at www.scriptural-truth.com
If you wish to support this channel, please consider making a donation:
/ apocryphile1970
To Purchase the Super Gospel:
www.amazon.com/Super-Gospel-H...
or:
fifthestatepub.com/2011/the-su...
Website:
www.scriptural-truth.com
The Scriptural-Truth website is run entirely by CZcams user JesusLove723.... Any donation to the site will help to defray his costs. ;)
Gospel of Peter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search Gospel of Peter
Date Second-half, 2nd Century AD
Attribution Saint Peter
Location Syria?
Sources Early Passion Stories, Canon Gospels?
Manuscripts 8th or 9th century
Audience
Theme first-hand account
The Gospel of Peter (Greek: κατά Πέτρον ευαγγέλιον), or Gospel according to Peter, is one of the non-Canonical gospels which were rejected by the Church Fathers and the Catholic Church's synods of Carthage and Rome, which established the New Testament canon, as apocryphal. It was the first of the non-canonical gospels to be rediscovered, preserved in the dry sands of Egypt.
A major focus of the surviving fragment of the Gospel of Peter is the passion narrative, which is notable for ascribing responsibility for the crucifixion of Jesus to Herod Antipas rather than to Pontius Pilate.
Authorship
The Gospel of Peter explicitly claims to be the work of the Apostle Peter:
"And I with my companions was grieved; and being wounded in mind we hid ourselves:" - GoP, 7.
"But I Simon Peter and Andrew my brother took our nets and went to the sea;" - GoP, 14.
However scholars generally agree that Gospel of Peter is pseudepigraphical (bearing the name of an author who did not actually compose the text).
The true author of the gospel remains a mystery. Although there are parallels with the three Synoptic Gospels, Peter does not use any of the material unique to Matthew or unique to Luke. Raymond E. Brown and others find that the author may have been acquainted with the synoptic gospels and even with the Gospel of John; Brown (The Death of the Messiah) even suggests that the author's source in the canonical gospels was transmitted orally, through readings in the churches, i.e. that the text is based on what the author remembers about the other gospels, together with his own embellishments.
Ron Cameron and others have further speculated the Gospel of Peter was written independently of the synoptic gospels using an early proto-gospel. A consequence of this is the potential existence of a source text that formed the basis of the passion narratives in Matthew, Luke, and Mark, as well as in Peter. Origen makes mention of the Gospel of Peter as agreeing with the tradition of the Hebrews. The relationship to the Gospel according to the Hebrews becomes more clear when Theodoret states that the Nazarenes made use of the Gospel of Peter, for we know by the testimony of the Fathers generally that the Nazarene Gospel was that commonly called the Gospel according to the Hebrews. The same Gospel was in use among the Ebionites, and in fact, as almost all critics are agreed, the Gospel according to the Hebrews, under various names, such as the Gospel according to Peter, according to the Apostles, the Nazarenes, Ebionites, Egyptians, etc., with modifications certainly, but substantially the same work, was circulated very widely throughout the early Church.
All audio read by myself, Robert C Ferrell. All Rights Reserved.
A Public Domain Text is available at:
www.earlychristianwritings.com...
Phewwee, I thank the good Lord Jesus for your voice. I clicked and clicked until I found your channel. No fancy music, no opinion, just the documents themselves. People need to hear these for what they are and how they were written without
pre- interpretation for even music will change your train of thought.
Thank You thank you 😘👀🙏👀✝️❣️👑😘📯🎶🎶🎵📯✝️❣️👑
This is also amazing. All praise and honor to The King of Kings! Come Lord Jesus.
Oh geez...
Thank you for this reading, it connects the dots for me.
"Serapion of Antioch (c. 205) records that ‘an odd writing called Petra’ was in presbyterial use during his time but later, according to Eusebius (d. 339) it was ‘withheld’ because ‘it contained some heresy’. That ‘heresy’ was the fact that Apollo was the god mentioned in that Gospel, not Jesus Christ, and the latter’s name was written over Apollo’s name in more modern times." Apollo was later changed to Our Lord.
Thanks for reading this.
Chapter 5 is interesting. “It was noon, and darkness came over all Judaea: and they were troubled and distressed, lest the sun had set, whilst he was yet alive.”
I found it a little suspicious at the end in verse 14 when he refers to 12 deciples when Judas had already hung himself
I knew this gospel, I remembered now.
Babbu celeste di u celu più altu per piacè perdonami tutti i mo piccati. Crea in mè un core novu, una nova creazione, una nova nascita. Per piacè stà in u mo core, scrivite e vostre lege è vuluntà in u mo core. Aiutatemi à camminà in i vostri modi di santità è di ghjustizia. (Vai è immergetevi in una piscina d'acqua è umilmente dichjarà à u Signore Diu Ghjesù è u Signore Ghjesù vi mandarà un rigalu, Spìritu Santu) U Spìritu Santu vi insegnerà, vi guidarà di i modi di u Signore Ghjesù. Benedettu sia u Signore Diu Ghjesù.
My power, my power, thou hast forsaken me?
Gnostic crap.
@@Angelotube5000 Gnostics don't believe Jesus is the Messiah.
@@Angelotube5000 How so?
It was cuz he had to take the drink
@@AverageAmerican uhh wrong. Their whole belief system was based on Jesus
Hey Sis. It's just the name of the town in Egypt where this was discovered. There are many other manuscripts that have been found there such as the Apocalypse of Peter. ;)
Apocryphile1970 what are your thoughts on this text?
Can you list the writings that Peter has written, even the ones that are controversial. I'll use discretion
Where’s the rest of it??????
@@Norriswheaton7 it's only a fragment.
@@EugenioTC 1 and 2 Peter were not written by Peter
If I recall the Akhmin fragments of the Apocalypse of Peter was one of the early books some communities read as scripture along with the Apocalypse of John. The book seemed to also be an early Christian work advocating for universal reconciliation.
The banned books and texts excluded from the Western cannon form a body of books, the Rejected Testament.
A r k o f the C o v e n a n t Tablets of the Law & Aaron's rod & mana
O l d Testament = Tablets otL
Old & New Testament. = Aaron's rod (cane or cannon)
[Tested over the Age of Darkness then bares fruit]
Rejected Testament = the hidden mana
Can u give me a list of books that havent been put in the bible that u posted on youtube please
Pretty sure he's got them on his website (scriptural-truth.com)
Apocraphile1790
To tell you the truth I want the rest to be free. But hey it’s your voice. Thanks anyway.
The Greatest Sin before God..
Once again, excellent work! I'm soaking up every word of your Apocryphal readings like a sponge. It would love it if you could read the Apocalypse of John and re-post, because the computer voice from that video is illegible to me.
This sounds credible to me.
why is this not complete
It was discovered in Akhmim, Egypt, already in a fragmentary form. We know that it was a story gospel like the four canonical gospels, but it's up in the air whether it told the complete story of Jesus or was just a passion narrative.
@@matheno9494 they wouldnt just wrote a passion without an origin 🤡
This was not composed by Simon Peter.
Care to elaborate?
@@dangenovese8905 It's a mid-second century work. Peter was long dead.
Nor were 1 and 2 Peter, And Mark was not written by Mark nor Matthew by Matthew nor Luke by Luke nor John by John
@@HistoryandReviews Tell another joke, my dear friend.
Why would the cross be placed in the tomb with Jesus?
The cross is following them. Its a cross of light, I presume, not material. Please find in the acts of John more about this light cross. Simply explained, its like in function, parallel with the Holy Ghost.
Clearly a forgery... Not even found in the Nag Hammadi library just in some "monk's" grave in Akhmim...
Bishop Serapian was called out as a heritic. Also, the fact that the text says that he felt no pain is a clear indication that of Docitisim. Clearly trying to say this was a spiritual body...
Whom the lord.... whom the lord what? ☹️
It's a fragment and that's just where it ends. A plausible continuation might be [...called at the toll booth], but it is just as possible that it says something else. No one will ever know unless a more complete fragment is found.
You put a lot of heretical garbage on your channel, when falsehood influences souls you are partly guilty for displaying it without any disclaimer that it's not true. This is a serious thing and you need to repent.
Funny talk for one following the faith of the whore of Babylon, who has laid down with the gods of other peoples and allowed herself to be defiled with the practices of pagans
The gospels aren’t legitimate either
Gospel Go spell
Sun son
God Gawd
😬
Evil Devil