What has Starmer Done in his First Week?
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 07. 2024
- The first 500 people to use my link will get a 1 month free trial of Skillshare skl.sh/tldrnewseu07241
Buy a copy of Too Long: www.toolong.news
Learn more about Too Long: • Too Long Q&A
After 14 years in opposition, the Labour Party now has the chance to put their policies into practice and change the country. So what changes has Starmer already made? And what does this tell us about how he will continue to govern as Prime Minister?
🎞 TikTok: / tldrnews
💡 Got a Topic Suggestion? - forms.gle/mahEFmsW1yGTNEYXA
Support TLDR on Patreon: / tldrnews
Donate by PayPal: tldrnews.co.uk/funding
Our mission is to explain news and politics in an impartial, efficient, and accessible way, balancing import and interest while fostering independent thought.
TLDR is a completely independent & privately owned media company that's not afraid to tackle the issues we think are most important. The channel is run by a small group of young people, with us hoping to pass on our enthusiasm for politics to other young people. We are primarily fan sourced with most of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corporations, no one telling us what to say. We can't wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, engaging and sharing. Thanks!
Having something like a “What has the government done this week (or month)” as a reoccurring format would be pretty nice I think.
Yes I would welcome this also😊
YES good idea
I AGREE
Big agreed
Yes please.
Trying to figure this out from typical news is really rather difficult when it gets blended in with tons of unnecessary fluff.
"Putting experienced people into government from outside the world of politics" - so basically people who are actually qualified, then? Weird.
No, it means that industry regulates itself
@@JackHawkinswrites except it doesn't.
I know, right? Government competency is strange.
Or those who've donated to him. Eg cronyism. Jobs for mates I think you'd call it if it were tories
@@mrwu2 Did they actually donate to his campaign or are you just making shit up? Genuine question btw
This all sounds really boring and sensible.
More of this please, no more tory showboating
Tory showboating? From TLDR?
@SirSupremmmmmmme sorry that's not what I meant. I mean the politics in general has no more showboating, it all seems down to business. Nothing was meant against tldr
First scandal's gonna be hilarious
Showboating? You mean the media and establishment resisting and criticizing everything they attempt? Don't confuse lack of scrutiny with sensible
@@pevebeyou mean like cancelling the Rwanda policy without anything to replace it?
Sure it may never have worked but even the slightest deterrent is gone, so expect more record migration.
Who'd think of putting somebody in charge of things they have an expert level of experience with instead of some powermad politician.
What a radical idea
@@2n01cal fr fr
Dastardly and maniacal, some might say.
itll be the death of us all it will, actual knowledgeable people in charge...never gonna work
@CedricTheMad Like Starmer not being an expert in beingPrime Minister?
It’s obvious why Starmer chose Richard Hermer. He’s a leading barrister and so is up to date on current law, where as Emily Thornberry hasn’t practiced law for almost 20 years.
Because he's a far left human rights shill who will go about ferrying in illegals?
It’s also a statement that unlike the previous government which appointed someone extremely partisan, who effectively acted to justify the legality of party policy, the new appointee is effectively neutral and can be expected to provide impartial judgement on the legality of policies.
I managed to read that as "He's a leading barista" XD.
@@alansmithee419
A coffee shop employee could have done a better job than any of the Tory Attorney Generals.
possibly also to appease the left of the party since hermer is refreshingly honest about gaza
Putting experienced people in junior roles really helps on the base level, so as to move them up as they make direct change on the floor level
I think it’s really important to have some element of technocracy (supervised by democratically elected leaders of course) involved in government
It’s shocking that it’s considered a “radical” move.
It actually has a negative effect.
@@davstarhow so?
being from the judiciary hes used to bringing expertise in its what is done all the time
"...similarly shocking was his decision to appoint experts to junior roles in the government." This is where the Tories have left us. This should just be how governments operate. So glad we have professionals finally in charge
@@IamGrimalkinexactly!
The uniparty should really do take note of what the uniparty is doing, it's just how they should operate!!!1!
@@pevebe delusional much
@@IamGrimalkin Gordon Brown did exactly the same thing with his "government of all talents"
@@haztec. Ah. I didn't know that. I will delete my comment.
My major concern is that Labour have very much locked themselves into this course of action. They've consistently promised no tax rises and no spending cuts, and reaffirmed that promise after the election. So the only way for them to raise funding is to stimulate economic growth.
If they pull this off it'll go down as one of the biggest economic turnarounds in our country's history. But if they fail and need to raise taxes or introduce austerity measures, nobody will ever trust Starmer again. I suppose we'll wait and see.
Well he said he wasn’t going to raise taxes on working people. Most interpret this as taxes won’t go up for lower and middle class people but will likely do so for the wealthiest.
Great point. In hindsight, it may have been better to promise less because they would still likely have gotten a big majority.
But then again, the vote share was so close that these promises may have been necessary to win (given the voting system relying heavily on centrist swing voters).
I’d be happy if they raised taxes on the owner class (people who own vast swathes of real estate for instance).
@@pepela8214 Yep - 'underpromise and overdeliver' can be a good strategy
As I recall they promised no tax rises in specific areas so they could still increase tax as long as they don't touch those.
in short "They said they'll do this in their manifesto, and they're actually doing what they said they would"
I’ve read that he chose Hermer over thornberry because of his experience tackling tricky issues that plugs the gaps in Starmers vast legal knowledge in a way that thornberrys couldn’t
Those Thornberries are wild
@@superhans85 Who would've thought Nigel would end up where he did
It also acts as a way for the AG to be in a way independent of government / cabinet but especially the labour party. Under last few AG's who were also Conservative MPs they acted as cover for government / party when they were up to something dodgy by saying things they were doing were legal when they were not or finding sneaky workarounds to make dodgy acts not appear so..... With Hermer being brought in like this, not being an MP for the party I think he will being a more "your not going to get away with that here" approach and will not have to yield to party politics.... Role of AG I think should always be independent not only of cabinet but also from party...
Also helps depoliticise the role, which is long overdue.
@@superhans85 She was a thorn in his side..
Wow, Starmer appoints people to positions who are actually qualified to run those positions? It's incredible that this is an unusual thing.
Completely agree, this SHOULDNT be anything extraordinary
David Lammy isn’t qualified to run a bath let alone look after our borders
@@polixthepole It shouldn't be we're used to the Tories and their pseudo-aristocracy behaviour.
First time you vote I bet…
i wonder why this wasnt the norm. i always thought it should be. not really a mystery that the nhs doesnt work when some random MP runs it
I’m glad to see the government investing with the hope of a real return rather than just selling off public assets for essentially nothing
National wealth fund? 😂
Give them time….
Starmer is a Torrie in sheep clothing
That's not a good take, the corporations are surely better at taking money from an industry for no reason
Proof?@@MrIlleism
Feels weird to have a Labour government again. I’m old enough to (vaguely being a kid) remember Labour being in power. But a change of pace and feeling optimistic again is good.
The country felt so grey under the Tories
What on earth is there to be optimistic about?
Don't know if you noticed mate. But the tories had been in power and ruined the country with continuous bad and selfish decisions for 14 years.
@@theantagonist2147Change. Hopefully they’ll see where the Tories doing nothing got them, and they’ll try and actually do something in government.
@@theantagonist2147literally everything, that's what optimism is, it's applicable to anything
WHAT??? Has Starmer gone mad? He is exactly that type of politician who would put a gardener in charge of the gardens, a carpenter in charge of furniture repairs, or an electrician in charge of the electrical installations! Does he not think of any completely incompetent guys whose only advantage is that they know someone who will not get these highly paid jobs now? S-H-O-C-K-I-N-G.
Username checks out
Undemocratic though
Calm down you are simping for a politician
@@e33d90 - No. Starmer just applies something called “common sense” to his policies. Considering that the very application of this “common sense” is so unusual that it is worth being pointed out is not “simping”.
@@mediocreman6323 it is only unusual in the UK
the Rwanda thing is funny because now the spokesperson for the Rwanda government came out and said since the UK government broke the agreement they won't be refunding anything and those houses that had been built would go to Rwanda's citizens 😂😂😂
Just goes to prove what a very, very bad deal it was to begin with.
Those houses were already being used by the government. Months ago. I'm sure you knew that
That's actually good. Rwandans get homes and the UK gets out of a shit deal.
Just chuck that under "Foreign Aid" then lol
and they got 40 million pounds from the Tories 🤣
Tories: "Labour doesn't have a plan!"
Labour: [Start their plan immediately after getting elected]
Tories immediately after they see Labour hitting the ground running: "WOKE. GONNA FAIL. NEVER GONNA WORK. MONEY WASTERS" lol they're coping so hard it's unreal.
@@CGDubz87 Calm down, it's only been a week!
They have to last five years but it will feel more like a couple of centuries.
You should definitely start a series where you update on what the government has done each month. Would be so useful to keep up with what they're doing
A government that does something significant every month is a government that is making far too many changes too fast
@@SmileyEmoji42they have 5 years
@@SmileyEmoji42 It doesn't have to be significant things every month. There are dozens of decisions that have to be made by ministers every month.
Basically they’re doing exactly what they said they’d do. I must say I’m pleasantly surprised.
@sgyrpcommand3778 your confusing them with the SNP
It’s just been a week you are very quick to judge
@@e33d90 first impressions matter.
@@sgtrpcommand3778 but impressions are not measurable results, time will tell if the policies are effective
Let’s just hope we can afford it🤞🏻
Appointing ministers on basis of merit and not their political capacity. Wow, didnt know this was a thing
Like David Lammy? :D
@@poopoppy Lammy gets himself dressed once a week so he's qualified for the job
Starmer is a Torrie in sheep clothing
@@MrIlleism Tories weren't doing anything competent in their 14 years in government so I doubt hiring competent blokes to relevant posts would paint Starmer as a Tory.
@@miguelchristopher7234 14 years and being incompetent. Think about that.
5:25 I think it's clean STEEL.
CLEAN GALVANIZED STEEL
Or maybe they’re being specially sincere, considering they’re taking people’s money to invest in what they want.
@@Edumt91 Oh shove it up ya. Tory coward.
@@Edumt91except the tories just gave everything to their mates
The fact that an essential public asset like steak mills were sold off in the first place was disgraceful, they should of been kept under government ownership and run as businesses
This series is essential for holding every government accountable, ensuring that promised progress is being made rather than just empty words.
maybe they could look at the Scottish government
Never seen the EU held accountable here
Grown up politicians who actually care about their nation.Well done Labour.
The idea of putting experts into junior government roles is interesting. I hope it works and it simply becomes convention.
Hopefully long term they can just do this without having to put people in the lords, would decrease the cronyism
it shouldnt be an exceptional thing if your aim is to improve the country
Many governments have shied away from that, because those top-level roles in the departments and ministries are basically "lobbyists" and "administrators" for those departments and ministries. They obviously have some responsibilities on the subject matter, but their main role is getting things done within their department - and that is a skill politicians usually have, as they know how to, you know, do politics.
So we have to see how this goes - I hope they can have more of an impact and don't drown in the administrative graveyard that you can find in the minefields of whitehall.
Agree! I was thrilled to see Timpson named and I hope this action sets a precedent for future governments.
I have to admit I was disappointed by the Environment/Rural appointment though, I know little of Steve Reed, but from what I've read it seems his work has mainly been in London -- the Tory's poorly served our agriculture sector, and I'm worried that may not change. I hope he's willing to travel to see our countrysides and rivers..
after international backlash, the desk returned to tldr news
They finished moving into their new studios; Rory mentioned it in the comments of a previous video.
Millions cheer
Professionality, dignity, competence. Simple.
Lol your name says it all. Delusional
You say that after just a week, just because the tories were bad doesn’t mean labour cant so anything wrong by definition
So what he’s done so far is allow tens of thousand of illegal asylum seekers in. And then also plans to release tens of thousands of prisoners. NICE ONE 😂
having someone who runs a business that cuts keys, in charge of prisons. Is kind of funny
I was about to say something snarky, but then realised, yes, it is strangely appropriate 😆
Timpson (the key-cutting business) has been vastly run by ex-offenders who have proven to be the most hard-working employees. The CEO of Timpson, James Timpson, has been appointed as Minister for Prisons, Parole and Probation. His ideology is not giving custodial sentences for petty offences to parents who shoplift to feed their children, but rather, to offer them a job at Timpson, where thy can earn a salary, and therefore, have no need in committing such crimes - elevating the issue of prisons being overcapacity. This model is also used in The Netherlands, it is called "Community Sentencing"
Community Sentence Explained:
A community sentence combines some form of punishment with activities carried out in the community. It could mean, for example, that an offender must:
- Carry out up to 300 hours of unpaid work, for example removing graffiti
- Have alcohol or drug treatment to help tackle the reasons why they have committed crimes in the first place
- Keep to a curfew to be in a particular place at certain times - keeps them out of trouble
- Being obliged to live at a particular address
- Being prohibited from travelling overseas
- Undertaking a rehabilitation activity requirement
- Taking part in a programme to help change offending behaviour
- Being forbidden to take part in particular activities
- Meeting an exclusion requirement, which means not being allowed to go to particular places
- Undergoing:
- Mental health treatment
- Drug rehabilitation
- Alcohol treatment
- Alcohol abstinence and monitoring requirement
This punishes offenders, and changes offenders’ behaviour so they don’t commit crime in the future. It also gives back to the community.
More than the tories did in 14 years that’s for sure.
No, it really isn't.
The Tories got a ton done in the last 14 years:
Made their own government collapse multiple times
Held a party at Downing Street in the middle of a pandemic
Gave us a brexit deal that the majority of people hate
Increased income inequality
Wasted time and money on trying to deport people to a country the overwhelming majority of them had never been in
Suck on that, Labour! I bet you won't do any of those things in the next 5 years. 😎
but did you vote ?
more of the same to be exact, just bit different
@@skelluripso not the same then
What? Releasing violent criminals early? Castrating us when it comes to oil supply? Granting 100k illegals the right to apply for asylum?
The first housing minister who has actually lived in social housing! Very exciting
the desk is back, let's gooooo
5:22 I hope you mean "£2.5bn clean STEEL" 😂
I was surprised to see clean STEAL as well; as a non-native English speaker, I have naively assumed that all native English speakers can spell properly smh .
@@nyantakyibannor9328nah English spelling is such a mess it catches a lot of us native speakers out some of the time 😅
@@nyantakyibannor9328 As a non-native English speaker, I spent twenty minutes searching Google because I thought there might be some kind of native trick there that I'm not understanding. :D
There is always at least one glaring typo in a TLDR news video, I'm convinced they're doing it deliberately at this point 🙄
Carbon capture: doesn’t work and proven it doesn’t work
Green hydrogen: hydrogen doesn’t even pollute the planet…
Them: *we are sooooooo eco-friendly*
"clean steal [sic]"
😂😂😂😂
Some things never change 😂😂😂
TLDR editors on meth again 😂😂😂
Freudian slip perhaps? 😂
Just dropping subtle hints that Labour are now tories.
@@matthewparker9276 Uniparty
YOU CANT KILL ME CAUSE IM ALREADY INSIDE YOU SIIIIIIIIC SIIIIIIIIIIC SIIIIIIIIIIC SIIIIIIIIIC
Damn You Autocorrect?
It says a lot that it seems bizzare that the govt have appointed experts in their field to be ministers rather than fellow cronies. That's what 14 years of Conservatives have conditioned us to expect!
Adults in charge again.
My thoughts exactly as I watched.
Yeah, cannot wait to pay £5 a liter for our fuel in 6 months.
You liberals will be crying then...
I really hope so, hopefully talented adults as well
Socialists are big children
I'm not interested in red or blue party politicking I just want to see improvements
Trouble with all the house building is they’ll just be snapped up by investors, rented out, AND it will inevitably come at the expense of parts of our countryside.
Hopefully they try to install some protections against that or enact policies that benefit first time buyers. Otherwise, the UK is cooked
It'l be fine if they actually build enough houses. Investors can't hold on to empty houses forever.
The fact he put actual experts in those government positions deserves a clap 👏👏👏
Maybe their fans and critics should wait 5 minutes? I didn't vote for them but my thought process is "Let's see in 2 years how they have started".
Usually, politicians get a 100 day grace period to settle in (which is already quite short)... But this doesn't seem to apply to this government. Maybe media outlets need to keep the output high just because they were so accustomed to reporting so much about the incompetence of previous politicians.
This is more or less what I was going to say they have done nothing, but they have announced quite a bit, and they can't get anything done until parliament is back.
That's no criticism it's just the way it is.
Because we've waited years for the Tories to do something.
@@SaintGerbilUK
There's lots that can be done, without needing debates and votes in Parliament.
Meeting health chiefs, police commissioners, diplomats, and planning officers, to explain how existing guidance should now be interpreted, makes a huge difference, at zero cost.
@@timowagner1329 Do not take what I say as fact, but over the last few years, I feel that the UK media has become even more right-leaning than before, only asking stupidly easy questions to the Tories, and only asking stupidly hard questions to Labour. I'm not old enough to remember the last Labour landslide, I'm almost a decade too young, but it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that the media aren't being as kind to Labour as they have been for the previous Tory governments.
"2.5 billion in Clean Steal" sounds like something the Tories would do.. ;-) best typo ever
Clean Steel is the thing Labour are investing in.
Clear Steal is what to Tories have been up to basically forever.
I can’t believe we finally have adults in charge
Which country do you live in?
We certainly do not have adults in charge here in the UK.
Rooting for ya UK, love from Brazil ❤
I really appreciate this channel, I'm 17 years old and it's great to get me caught up on my country's politics without having to go looking for trustworthy news sources, it makes it all a lot more accessible! I appreciate how you feel very unbiased as well, so I can form my own opinions on things after getting all of the information :)
No wonder he wants to lower the voting age if you think this is an unbiased source of information
@mrwu2 what makes this a biased source? what bias have they demonstrated clearly in a video? If you can give me a good example of this I will concede my point but back up statements you make.
@@aero42 if it wasn't it would have bought up the negatives
Like....Releasing violent criminals early? Castrating us when it comes to oil supply? Granting 100k illegals the right to apply for asylum and removing the rwanda plan without a current alternative (not saying rwanda was good, but its better than nothing)
Wasting 3 billion on a proxy war?
How about a mention of the return of unelected corrupt blairites?
I've watched many of these guys videos, they are pro labour and left wing. Completely biased
There is certainly a left wing slant to these videos. They're particularly guilty of omitting positives coming from the right and negatives from the left, more so than being deceitful
@@anglonrx2754It would be good if you could provide some examples of this “left wing slant” and “omission of positives from the right”. It would be fair to say that this first week has been a largely very successful one by comparison to much of the chaos of the previous conservative governments. If anything, this channel could have been much more positive about how their week has gone, but instead chose to stay rather moderate. Just because the objective state of things “that Labour is having a good first week” is being described, does not mean it is harbouring a left wing bias.
£2.5B for "clean steal" sounds like it's going in the Chancellor's pocket.
It's about installing arc furnaces.
4:46 'Clean Steal' 😂 You can only hope it's not that.
Hope that Labour will revamp and revitalize the wonky economy and appalling public services of the UK. British people have endured enough excruciating moments in the Tory era.
It should not be shocking that experts get managerial roles 🤦♀
It's insane that putting experts in government is a new thing, glad it's finally happened though, things are looking better already
They will not be building‘Houses’with nice gardens but high rise flats like the rubbish they built in 50s and 60s.Same stupidity all over again.
"None of this should really come as a surprise" I dunno man, I feel like politicians following through on their campaign promises is actually a huge surprise
I like Kiers Tarmer, and I'm glad he is the new PM for the next six weeks.
People insult his lack of personality, but I don't want personality. I want capability!
What do you expect to happen in six weeks, then?
@@annphillips1086 Maybe Liz Truss will come back for a little while.
@@drewlovelyhell4892 Well there's an... interesting prospect.
I prefer Steer Karmer.
It seems that UK has done the right choice to kick Tories out of power after 14 years…
Sending my best wishes to Starmer’s government from Brazil
Done more in 1 week than the last few years of Tory rule.
Brainwashed beyond comprehension
Labor’s plans to ruin the UK countrysides is incredibly unsettling. 😟
Yes, with houses and green energy 🙃
@@8Scientist I'm more worried about the people living in those houses. We all know they aren't British.
Yes because British people aren't anything to worry about but not being British justifies concern. You pillock
@@doszl why would non British people be a problem?
Imagine holding back energy reform for decades because you don't like windmills dotting the landscape. NIMBYism has to end.
This is a good start!
When I stay up till tldr uploads thays when I know to go to bed
This is the news format i never knew i wanted. Please keep doing recap videos like this. Super helpful
In Northampton, the roads are outright dangerous due to the lack of maintenance. Within a few days of Labour being in power I noticed more and more potholes being marked and eventually repaired. Coincidence I think not
It probably is, my local areas gotten worse,😂 they wouldn't have had the capacity to change anything that wasn't already planned in the week they've been in
I'm pretty sure those 2.5 billion are for clean steel, not "clean steal".
A quite funny mistake on this graphic.
I actually was looking for this😂
Appointing EXPERTS to government roles should be standard.
Just like when a person applies for a job they have to prove they are qualified to do that job.
Listening to experts is crucial. Scientific method, peer review etc are the best way to get reliable information.
Builds 1.5 million homes in 5 years, yet will let in 4+million migrants that are not contributing, who got here from safe countries. Disgraceful
So far pretty positive about the changes, though missing a mention thay the Labour governement also immediatly sent additional aid to Ukraine, which is based.
They sound like a competent government so far. A refreshing change from the last 12 years. But we’ll see….
What? Releasing violent criminals early? Castrating us when it comes to oil supply? Granting 100k illegals the right to apply for asylum? Wasting 3 billion on a proxy war?
Let criminals leave prison earlier...
So the government is pushing policies that will encourage the construction of houses. But doesn't say anything about corporations buying up property.
probably more than the tories lmao
Wow original well thought out comment there
@@mrwu2 i know, my mommy says i was born with alot of estrogen like you so we are pretty much the same
@@mrwu2 go to Rwanda
@@mrwu2yeah don’t just insult someone for no reason you knob.
@@GabibboReallyou should receive a medal for bland meaningless comments
I think Starmer is essentially a technocrat and that´s fine, as long as you have some balance in the cabinet. The problem is his cabinet is largely full of Keir Starmer clones, the only ones that are interesting are the prisons minister and the science minister. I think it´s dangerous to fill a cabinet full of people who 100% agree with you.
I think this government will be more competent at running departments etc than the Tories (not hard to achieve), but Starmer doesn´t get that you can´t solve all problems just by running departments more efficiently. Like other Liberal democracies, the UK has a number of huge crises, the first and foremost being wealth inequality and it´s contributing greatly to political instability.
The other one is whether or not we want to have a pause on muliticulturalism or whether we want it to continue. The UK won´t cease to be multicultural and I think most people don´t want a total cease in all honesty, but there is definitely a debate as to if we´re becoming too diverse and having some fragmentation. I tend to be on the more liberal side of that debate myself, but we can´t just wish the issue away, like Starmer wants to, it has to be tackled.
I don´t think Starmer really understands or cares about these problems and it could be his undoing. He doesn´t deal with opposition well either, he just tends to shut people down or kick them out of the party if they disagree with him.
I suppose you could say that Kier is a product of the situation the Labour party has found themselves in.
They want someone who runs a tight ship by not allowing dissent within the party and someone so utterly boring that they will likely not get involved in scandals.
I actually think it's a pretty good strategy for getting into and staying in government.
@@pepela8214 well, they kind of won 2024 by default, the Tories had screwed up so badly that no opposition party could fail to lose that election.
The thing is if Reform hadn´t have run, Starmer wouldn´t have won a landslide, he may have even had to do a coalition with the Libdems.
Likewise, structural stupidity is a real thing and it´s what happens when you have no ideological diversity.
I.e the Tory party went crazy, largely because Johnson kicked out all the Remainers and all the liberal Tories.
I have a feeling the same thing will happen to Starmer´s Labour if he just has a cabinet of fairly hard Blairites and doesn´t consider any ideas from further left.
Might it not be a good idea not to make assumptions about what he does and doesn't know and care about until he's been in office for more than a few days? That's an awful lot of baseless assumptions you're making.
In your last paragraph you wrote "Starmer" but meant Johnson.
@@talideon The assumptions are not baseless.
1)My first paragraph is true, essentially there´s nobody in his shadow cabinet who isn´t from his faction of the party. I suspect he thought even Thornberry might give him some opposition.
Even Blair had people like Clare Short and Frank Dobson in his cabinet. There is no ideological diversity at all. That´s not "an assumption", that´s a fact. All these people have histories you can easily look up.
2) That´s how Starmer has operated during his election campaign, he´s very reluctant to deal with fundamental questions about how the country should actually look.
It´s not part of how his mind works. That´s not a problem if he has people in the cabinet who gets that, but so far he´s filled the cabinet with people who think like him.
3)He doesn´t deal with opposition well. Blair and Brown, whatever their faults, didn´t just shut people down who disagreed with them. They knew how to make their case. Starmer very much does. Plenty of party activists have challenged him publically and he just stared at them blankly and then had them expelled.
4) He may well get re-elected and I suspect he will be better than the Tories, but that might not be good enough in 2029 and the election results show he has a big potential challenge to his left as well as his right. That´s not "baseless", that´s based on information from last election results.
I think a weekly or monthly update on things is actually a very good idea
I'll reserve full judgement, but it's refreshing to see a government appoint people who are expert at their fields, than a sadistic spin the wheel just to keep power. 14 years of trauma
almost as if allowing foreign oligarchs' operations, aristocracy and nonproportional voting were bad ideas
Labour putting people with xp on the gov is such a move
These changes sound incredibly sane. Dare I hope for actual improvement in the years to come?
Recently I enjoy listening to other countries politics rather than my own (US). Seems they made more progress in a week than us in months
As an American “what has the government done this week” has a totally different tone.
I think we need more shoreline protection. The Netherlands did it, and I think we should too.
MORE FLOOD DEFENCES!!!!!
@@Zen-rd9np yes! It’s awful how many places flood from one storm here! Our eastern coastline is eroding at a rapid rate. We should reclaim some land before the British isles become 3 islands!
@@Lemon10.5
Gonna be difficult no?
Britains east coast got some of the most rapidly eroding shorelines in europe cus a lot of it is composed of glacial til (soft rock very easy to weather).
The Netherlands managed it because the flooded area was inland therefore they could dam it up and then go for reclamation.
Defending one area causes problems later on down the shoreline sediment system.
@@Reixuria I was thinking more along h the e lines of putting in tougher rock to protect it. They have already spent money on one part of the shoreline further south, but the higher north you go the less protected.
That’s like your opinion bro
steel surely, not steal 😂
They also banned North Seal oil licenses and retracted coal mine planning perms that were already granted. Maybe don’t try to only give a one sided opinion on the matters
'Labour' have not said they will cancel the Tories 'voucher' scheme.Disabled people are the most vulnerable in society and the Tories 'voucher' scheme has caused the disabled a tremendous amount of stress and anxiety. So I'll reserve judgement on this 'Labour' government.
This seems, dare I say... competent. While I have issues with Labour and Starmer, I'll take them over the Tories any day.
But please tell me how we're fixing the NHS and stopping arms sales to Israel...
No one is pro Palestine except Jeremy Corbyn but they kicked him out
millions of migrants flooding you borders and you are talking about stopping sales to israel. lmao.
Incrementally like everything else, as for Israel it is our greatest ally of democracy in the middle east though losing the propaganda war at current. It is against British and overall democratic interests to prevent Israel attaining needed arms. Not to mention such aid is bargaining power giving influence and in return usually for a myriad of technology made in Israel. If your interests align with Russia, China, Iran and North Korea perhaps you should revaluate them.
I welcome the puddle, and suggest we go further.
NIMBY planning laws might be important but so are environmental considerations especially areas like migration bird landings, and rare flowers; and also food security. These should be done where possible in brown and grey belt land, and areas where there is neither SSSI's or food growth.
The difference between a spoils system and civil service is night and day.
All I can say is the UK will be more closer with the EU as well as changing the Brexit deal, so hopefully restoring the Freedom of Movement
Very unlikely. The EU won't soften, not even with the change of Government. Sends the wrong message to the rest of the member states.
Probably not, but we can hope.
Getting back freedom of movement would be amazing.
Ahhh crap. Not good!
@@pepela8214how so? More burdens on the state?
EU will do nothing for us until we do what we signed up to do, the tories have been deferring
Finally a news video that actually tells us what the government is doing
Rayner as Housing Secretary..the Irony.
Like every other Labour or Tory government, very little for Scotland is you're answer.
TLDR D&D when?
dungeons and dragons or david benioff and d b weiss
@@teelo12000 Yes
What’s with all the new back grounds?
Change is great. Yes, he's looking rather sexual in this episode... 🤣😂🤣
New studio.
Yes, it's weird the government went for new backgrounds like 'scientist', 'lawyer' and 'successful CEO' when there are so many people with tried and tested qualifications like 'went to school with the PM', 'donated large amounts to the party' and 'agrees with everything I say'.
And don't get me started on the new backgrounds in D&D 2024...
Ker is our man hence we unapologetically and unreservedly say whatever he does or doesn’t do, we fully support him. Full stop.
"clean steal" cracked me up
Updating intro anytime soon? Humza Yousaf still in the intro
Appointing people I roles that they know what they are doing is a no brainier
Starmer is a Torrie in sheep clothing
But will they actually do what they are supposed to or just procrastinate? That is the question.
This is really great coverage. Can you do something like this so often just summarising everything the government is doing. Could even be "this month in the government"
Taking bets on how many policies Starmer is going to backtrack on for the Kings speech.
Appointing people who have experience in the job instead of just fellow toffs from Oxbridge who fancy the extra prestige and power!? Well it’s radical, but it might just work…
Starmer is a Torrie in sheep clothing
Imagine a weekly update called 'Gov News: Politics and Shenanigans'-tune in to see what laws they pass and what laws of physics they break!
0:00 *the Table’s back!!!!*
Has it already been a week?
My concept of time is shattered.
What are his plans to eliminate islamic extremism which has risen from practically zero 50 years ago to the massive problem that it is today?
It's not a massive problem. If anything islamophodia is the issue. And if the people of Islam are upset It's probably because we invaded their country.
*Amazing video, you work for 4Oyrs to have $1M in your retirement, meanwhile some people are putting just $10K into trading from just few months ago and now they are multimillionaires*
Hello, I am very interested. As you know, there are tons of investments out there and without solid knowledge, I can't decide what is best. Can you explain further how you invest and earn?
Same, I operate a wide- range of Investments with help from My Financial Adviser. My advice is to get a professional who will help you, plan and enhance your management skills. For the record, working with Barry Silbert, has been an amazing experience.
Hello how do you make such monthly?? I'm a born Christian and sometimes I feel so down🤦🏽of myself because of low finance but I still believe in God
I'm favoured, $90K every week! I can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America,, all thanks to Mr Barry Silbert
Such information we don't get from most CZcamsrs, how can I get to him
Hvala puno za video! 🇷🇸
I haven't made any decision on the 'Labour' Party. We don't know yet. I need a to see a lot more. For me...not a good start.