WALTHER CCP M2 380 - Still Relevant? 380 ACP Soft Shooter
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- The original Walther CCP came out about 7 years ago, then they came out with the M2 version which made the takedown a lot easier for cleaning. Then they came out with the 380 ACP version, which is what we review today on the table.
9mm Walther CCP: • Walther CCP
Please check us out on:
Facebook at: / hammerstriker
Patreon at: / hammerstriker
Twitter at: / _hammerstriker
Instagram at: / hammer_striker
Utreon at: utreon.com/c/H...
Our new web page at: www.hammerstrik...
See the Affiliates page for other useful links.
Hey, it makes a hole on a criminal attacking you, it’s good. Hell, a classic J frame with 5 rounds is still relevant. It’s a matter of practice and a trained user.
Hello Mr. Hammer,
I am back looking at this again, compared to the new PD380 now out there. I know there different, but this firearm is a better choice for me.
Thanks again
Been on 2 shootings as a Emt/firefighter..
Both people defending themselves with a 380 against 3 attackers…
All 3 attackers were hit with 1 shot each, and all 3 attackers went down w one shot….
Don’t overlook a 380…
Is it possible to pull the slide back far enough to load a round but not quite far enough to cock the striker like in the 1st Gen CCP models? Can you test this so we know if they fixed this safety issue
Man if Walther would make an M3 version with all the PDP improvements and a double stack mag I think they’d have the industry leading pistol
Instead, Canik listened to all the comments begging for one and came up with the MC9. I am so fed up with Walther ignoring the obvious.
Or, even easier, just release a PDP chambered in 380
But they had to make the oddball hammerfired PD380 single stack for… reasons?
@@garrettlundy3959 I assume that they are able to make the the PD380 more cheaply than a proper micro PDP. It's weird though because apparently the gun is a tilt barrel design vs. blowback and the slide is steel, so I'm not sure where the cost reduction is coming in. I do like that it has a paddle mag release. I thought Walther had given up on that. Of course it's stupid to push something on the American market that they don't like, and it will likely negatively impact sales.
@@garrettlundy3959 Ugh, it has no slide release and a magazine disconnect. What little interest I had just evaporated, never mind the cost of 380 ammo.
Excellent video!
Thank you.
Great review as always.👍🏼
Thank you.
Thanks for the video. Very thorough review. Not a fan of the magazine disconnect though. I carried as my service pistol an HK P7 M13 for about 14 years. That pistol was of a gas delay design in 9mm with the squeeze cocker mechanism. I’m surprised they didn’t adopt the side operated take down “button” which was easy to do I doubt whether it’s still under patent. But I’m sure they had their reasons. Thanks again.
I like the idea of the gas delayed design in 380 acp and the low pricepoint but the low capacity for its size and not as good trigger made me skip it. I feel like the Walther P22 is the best Umarex design they have (although the PK380 is nice too).
Also the CCP isn't a true Walther. It's made by Umarex in their Arnsberg plant, and the substandard quality shows in the design of the internals.
There’s a lot going for the CCP - particularly the ergonomics.
But the right-hand only safety and no optic support is a deal killer.
For another around the house gun, I'll grab a Ruger Security 380 instead. Double the capacity. When it comes to double stack 380s, it's only competition is the Bersa Thunder Plus. Glock is slackin
Thanks for the informative & insightful review.
You had mentioned that the Walther has a relatively light slide, however, you had also mentioned that it wasn’t the lightest-which concealed carry pistol(or pistols)have you found to have the lightest slide?
I assume that the S & W EZ would be one of them.
Thanks again❗️
Very nice presentation. I wonder how it stacks up against SIG P365-380.
Actually more interested how it stands up to the Ruger Security 380.
Thank you - we will be doing comparisons against its competition and the two mentioned in the comment/reply are on the list.
These mid-size high capacity.380's have appeal but I've become dependent on my LCP Max; 11 rounds, super light and I barely notice it in my pocket.
@fallensummit it’s definitely snappy compared to full size 9’s, but not overly unpleasant/painful to shoot. The fatter grip makes it a lot nicer to shoot IMO when compared to the single stack 380s.
Any video showing how to swap out the front site? Heard some came with the wr9ng front site replacements.
For dry fire you can just hold the slide stop with your thumb.
Guess nobody had the Communist China Party in mind when they named this.
If they get this , what will they want next?
I really like Walther and own several of them in different calibers but this gun does not impress me at all. It looks cheap and I definitely don't like the trigger. I own the 22 version of this and that fixed barrel design is a pain to breakdown and put back together.
HK P7 series has a much much simpler take down method than the CCP
Loks like there's a big dent in the crown of the barrel
It is just glare from the studio lights and that specific angle.
How many and what gas-delayed pistols have you seen ?
It is not a common system in pistols, the entire CCP line is gas-delayed. The H&K P7 and a few more obscure one such as the Steyer GB.
...its beautiful.😢😰😥😫🤤🤧
Glad it’s a easy rack but why complicate the take down if you can’t clean it pretty much useless simple is better imo is Walther making these or are they farming it out
wanted a CCP M2 380acp at one point ...
Sights look like they are Glock compatible