Inside the D-45 Class Destroyer: Power and Innovation at Sea
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- 🌊🔍 Dive deep into the world of the D-45 Class Destroyer! Discover the advanced technology, formidable armament, and the commitment to crew comfort that make these ships a cornerstone of the Royal Navy. From radar-absorbing design to the Sea Viper missile system, learn how the D-45 Class maintains maritime superiority. Don't forget to like, subscribe, and hit the bell for more military insights! ⚓💥
I see you like removing my comment about the problems with the D-45. Her it is again>
Type 45s have been hit by technical difficulties, with instances of the vessels suffering electrical problems or even loss of power, particularly when operating in hot and humid temperatures such as those found in the Middle East.
It's true; and it's because the Secretary of State for Defence at the time (Geoff Hoon) insisted on going for the Rolls Royce WR21system that used a Northrop Grumman recuperator that would cause so much trouble.
It's true that the Type 45 destroyers have faced technical challenges, particularly with their electrical systems and power supply in extreme conditions. These issues have been well-documented and are actively being addressed. Also, I want to clarify that I don't remove any comments. It's essential to recognize that while the D-45 has faced hurdles, the Royal Navy continues to work on solutions to ensure their operational readiness and effectiveness.
@@Military_Forces_Unleashed Mainly what I am getting at something so serious should of been found out before making them all. The T-45 had a chance to be a great Warship and if they can really fix the problem not just do a patch work it still can!
@@Military_Forces_Unleashed THERE IS NO “D-45”!
@@JoeyRay-fz1qe PIP really has sorted the issue out. Two (Daring and Dauntless) have completed it: two more (Dragon and Defender) are undergoing PIP (Dragon is almost ready); the last two will have the work done in due course.
FFS. You can't even get the name right! It's Type 45, T45, Daring or (VERY rarely) D class.
Thank you for pointing out the correct naming conventions. We strive for accuracy in all our content, and your feedback helps us maintain high standards. We'll make sure to get it right in future references
Garbage design, lacks long range strike capability, cant reload at sea. Cant provide long range ginfire support. Wouldn't survive against Russian Tu26M Backfire bomber attack with the mechanically unreliable QE2 CARRIERZ
Ah, the Arleigh Burke, a 'garbage design' that’s been the backbone of the U.S. Navy for decades. Sure, it lacks long-range strike capability, can't reload at sea, and wouldn’t survive against a Tu26M Backfire. And yet, it continues to dominate the seas, protect fleets, and serve with distinction worldwide. Mechanically unreliable QE2? Now that's a bold claim. Perhaps we should notify the Navy to stop winning maritime engagements and take notes from internet critics."