@@JakesMathLessons So if given everything plus the height you would just do the exact same process? For example if the height given is 12 nothing would change about the answer?
@@deadlift5008 correct! Since a cylinder has perfectly straight vertical sides all the way up, the height of the cylinder doesn’t impact the answer when talking about the rate of change of the height. If it were talking about how fast the volume was changing or if we had a cone instead of a cylinder, the height would matter.
Thank you very so much for this video it helped me a lot❤
Thank you very helpful
You’re welcome, happy to help!
Thank you for posting! Good explanations for everything, it definitely helped me with my homework!
You’re welcome, I’m glad it helped!
really helpful going in depth, you deserve more subs
Thank you! I’m glad it was helpful!
Thank you very much. Gracias!!
You’re welcome!
Thank you. This video was good.
You’re welcome, I’m glad it helped!
Thank you so much I was struggling with this now I understand it a lot better
You’re welcome, I’m glad it helped!
Thank you Jake! My teacher wouldn't help because he's evil.
You’re welcome!
Would you do the same thing if given the height
Yeah that would work pretty similarly. You could use the height to find the radius instead.
@@JakesMathLessons So if given everything plus the height you would just do the exact same process? For example if the height given is 12 nothing would change about the answer?
@@deadlift5008 correct! Since a cylinder has perfectly straight vertical sides all the way up, the height of the cylinder doesn’t impact the answer when talking about the rate of change of the height. If it were talking about how fast the volume was changing or if we had a cone instead of a cylinder, the height would matter.
Nice thanks! Just reviewing. I'm in II now we're emptying it lol.
You’re welcome! Good luck!