Andrew Wilson vs Woke Feminist: Is Ab0rti0n Murder? (HEATED)
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 05. 2024
- 🔗 Full video: • Andrew Wilson vs. Coll...
📅 Dating Talk is LIVE every Sunday & Tuesday 5:00 PM Pacific Time
▶️ WATCH LIVE: czcams.com/users/whatever?sub_...
💎 Join: czcams.com/users/whateverjoin
📺 Patreon: / whatever
👕 Merch: shop.whatever.com
💵 Tip Jar: paypal.com/donate/?hosted_butt...
🎥 Equipment: amazon.com/shop/whatever
📘 Facebook: / whatever
🐦 Twitter: / whatever
📷 Instagram: / whatever
👾 Twitch: / whatever
👽 Reddit: / whatever
🏴☠️ Brian: / bd_atlas
🌴 Linktree: linktr.ee/whatever
🎧 Listen: anchor.fm/whatever
Pretending that a fetus is not a baby while pretending that a man can be a woman. Psychosis.
Not really. A fetus and baby are used separately because they're separate things. Same thing for cis and trans people. The only people who don't understand they're different are the ones too stupid to learn.
All fetuses IDENTIFY as BABIES ... checkmate lunatics, lol.
You nailed it! 👏
I don’t subscribe to the trans crap but I am pro choice. You can call it a fetus, a baby, or whatever you want. It doesn’t actually matter. Abortion is about bodily rights. No one has the right to use your body without consent which includes a fetus. Let’s say that a 3 year old was in need of part of a kidney transplant. Should we create laws that “force” the mother of that child to give part of her kidney? I realize that most mothers would willingly do this but thats beside the point….. I’m asking if we should “force” the mother? Because you seem to be in favor of forcing the mother to allow a fetus to use her body….. so shouldn’t the 3 year get the same right?
Most accurate comment I've seen all day💯
Pro Choice is a euphemism for -“don’t want to be responsible for my choices.”
And pro life is a euphemism for I want to control other people’s lives while making no financial contribution to it… also don’t raise my taxes.
Worse they want to be applause for it , heck they don't even want to be question for it . If you do your the monster
You had your choice 9 months ago (SA excluded)
Nah, it's none of your business. It's just that simple
these bithes crahzy
Andrew does not give up, he pushes and pushes until they're in a corner and look ridiculous.
He's so fun to watch
100%
Andrew is a douchbag!
This girl deserves to think about her horrible position.
"Not one step back"
agreed. pulling the roots out for everyone to see.
He should've just pointed out that murder is defined as taking the life of a "human", not the life of a "person".
He could have pointed out that the two have been synonymous for all of history until psychopaths realized they lost the abortion argument to science. Now, they are using the communist tactic of changing the definition to fit their narrative. You can’t simply remove their human sacrifice ritual.
her argument is completely pathological.
She's sick
unbelievably narcissistic. That we can murder babies... even at 42 weeks if the child's birth is delayed she's saying that it would be right for abortion.
definitely not , i don't agree with her standards BUT , the reasoning hold the line . if it's in abortion range it's not murder even in criminal cases . so in short her statement is "not born" not a human (yet) , since murder concerns human, her reasoning is totally logical . So the main problem here is "the abortion range", and the crossing line about it . "a human being regarded as an individual" (took the definition from a dictionnary)
@@gabrob3449 She just allowed herself to be trapped into a corner. No consistency at all. She lacked the maturity or intelligence to engage in any nuanced analysis whatsoever. So the child doesn't exist at 41 weeks (one week over) but is yet to be born.? But exists one minute after birth? Nonsense argument. Also she wouldn't consider it murder if someone deliberately injured a pregnant woman so the baby died? Doesn't she understand that might embolden some exboyfriends not wanting to pay child maintenance. Of course its murder. Because of her inexperience, immaturity and lack of human awareness, she highlighted the dangers of being an ideological zealot. I don't think its a sickness. Its just ignorance and brainwashing.
@@gabrob3449 She tried to pretend that her view will never lead to abortions up to full term. But we know in other countries its already up to 30 weeks and they're wanting to extend it. And abortions do occur. Its all about her being so obsessed with her ideology, that she refuses to connect with real people and the real world. Her thoughts are more important than people.
Again another video showing why certain demographics shouldn't vote.
Well you know who they voted for and look where we are now
White people?
They really shouldnt. Individual women can be smart but when groups of women get together they become children. Allow them to vote but disallow any women-only institution. This murderous ideology only came abiut from privileged women insulated in colleges in civilized areas. If a man isnt there to ground them they will come up with such selfish and destructive philosophies
Yeah it shouldn't be based either on man or woman or just being alive. There is a couple of good ways I think. If you're a tax payer IE putting more into the system than taking out you can vote. If you work in the public sector or government no voting for you. This goes for teachers, non-profits, government workers or contractors like working for DoD or any alphabet agency no voting for you.
She can't even defend her opinions. She just has her opinions for no reason. I would hope that she wasn't my lawyer if we ever went to court because she couldn't defend a fart in an elevator.
It's really insane that all of the abortion dialect boils down to people just wanting sex without consequence...
And women wanting sex without consequence just translates into them wanting to be men.
HER IGNORANCE IS MIND BOGGLING
It's not ignorance, it's psychopathy. I've had this debate many times over with women. They know it's killing but do not want to give up the power they have over life and death.
I'm not religious like Andrew but, that woman is pure EVIL.
I think she is brainwashed and thinks she is the righteous one here. You shouldn't call her evil. There is an element of puritan about her. But she speaks like a zealot that can't properly answer questions unless she can frame all the answers according to her ideology. She seems nice enough, but so adamant to stand by her ideology that she can't answer a basic moral question. No different to fanatics that join cults and think and do all these crazy things. I reckon in the future if she has kids and matures she mightn't be too proud of what she's said. The brainwashing is obvious in her, because she's young and inexperienced. She's struggling to answer basic questions and struggling to fit them within her ideology, instead of actually answering a fundamental human rights and ethical question.
totally agree!
This woman is a monster and heartless.
@@alantriplett304 I think her views are monstrous. I think she can't see or care about the human impact of all her theories. It may be immaturity or perhaps there is a sociopathy. I can understand your heartless comment. Its all about her theories first and foremost. Real life and people seem to get in the way and aren't as important to her. So probably a narcissist and lacking in humility. But monster is a bold claim.
@@Yum676 I wouldn't say evil. But the consequences of her actions are the issue. Her ideology is the most important thing for her. There isn't any caring about the impacts on humans. She can't and won't remove herself from her strictly applied theories on life. Like a fundamentalist zealot she can't relate to the real world and instead parrots views to maintain her ideological stance. Sad really. For her and others.
"you have to draw the line somewhere" and she draws the line at whenever is convenient to her, rather than what's logical.
Amen this woman is either a bad troll or really that dumb 😂
I was going to say the same thing.
hey if children have to die in the process... so be it! I mean does she look like she cares?! Of course not... its only children after all.
You have to draw the line somewhere, what about drawing where a new life with new unique dna different from the mother and the father is formed ?
Satanic satanic satanic. Call them out on what it is. It’s satanic. Period.
She's pure evil.
""As an ob/gyn physician for 31 years there is no medical situation that requires aborting / killing the baby in the third trimester to 'save the mother's life,'" Koning reportedly wrote. "Just deliver the baby by c/section and the baby has 95+% survival with readily available NICU care even at 28 weeks. C/section is quicker and safer than partial birth abortion for the mother." ,Lawrence Koning, MD, FACOG
So, are there any real cases where abortion is necessary to save the woman's life? I personally think that women needing abortion to save their life is really hyped by the MSM.
Facts don't affect people with this level of delusion and immorality.
how are other women okay with this? wtf?
It's not murder the day before birth? It's okay at 9 months?
this is scary times we live in smh
If I didn't know any better, I'd say they love having these procedures to give them a feeling of power, whether it's over a child's life or in the name of "fighting the patriarchy" in order to spite the child's father. There's 12 methods to stop pregnancy, and apparently they never use them, which is why this is always such an issue.
No one taught them about consequences so they don't think about this when they let Chad and Tyrone rawdog them.
Her feelings are far more important that objective fact.
other women are not only ok with this but pushing this agenda forward... you all think women are these pure innocent creatures when this literally couldn't be further from the truth. They will kill their own children in order to make their own lives easier and they will try to sell you the idea of 'Ohhh I did it because I was thinking of the child!'
Some women aren't interested in pregnancy or childbirth.
This woman's position is absolutely unbelievable. I have nothing but contempt for her ideology.
I'd argue it's not "her" ideology. This mentality has been peddled by degen ideolgues for decades.
They have no shame
Why is it unbelievable?
It's right there in front of you to witness, how do you not "believe" something that's right in front of you?
She really did say the things she said and she really acted the way she acted, there's nothing to "believe", it's a fact.
The face of evil
You are a man. You don't understand women's lives and shouldn't try to.
Andrew's SA question broke her illogical brain, and it was glorious to watch
*_She is admitting she is a Satanist without actually using the words "I am a Satanist!"_*
Communism is that with an economic/scientific wrapping. Feminism is the women's branch. And the greens are wrapped in a flowery cloak. But it is all the same religion.
Yep, he just shifts your focus to completely only caring about yourself. She thinks she cares about other women, but she doesn’t, she only cares about the women and people that confirm her same viewpoints. Satan came after women in Eden and he’s doing it again.
I actually kept thinking you have to be indwelled by an evil entity to utter what she is uttering
Young and dumb.
...young? She looks like 45
@@HaoPieldeosolol. Gen-Z is aging like milk.
And full of c**
She won't concede the point and that shows she has no credibility.
but she's pretty
Eh@@johntsingis
nor humility
@@johntsingis so she should stick to what she's good at.
It's akin to arguing with the devil about life.
This woman is delusional how in the HELL is dismembering a 9 month old baby not murder!!!
That doesn’t happen. An abortion at that stage of development is nothing to do with killing and all to do with separating.
"You have to make a distinction somewhere"
Yeah, that distinction is at conception when a new life is formed. Simple.
Correcto
Yes
She doesn't think killing a pregnant women and her unborn child a double murder??? How convenient.
Especially at close to term. That's how far this argument was stretched.
So why does the law see the death of the unborn baby as murder in one situation but not in the other.?
@@davidmoore2308 Because it's arbitrary /sarc.
@@davidmoore2308 Cause u can "see" that a pregnant woman is pregnant (most of the time) so it's a worse crime, and maybe to condamn efficiently illegal abortion ? Good question anyway , and this point should be discussed in order to make valid laws on that matter .
@@gabrob3449 so if you can see a women is pregnant that makes the baby a person.
The amount of times this woman contradicts herself is staggering.
She’s a monster, and she doesn’t even know it.
She's a minion. The monsters are the ones that got her to think this way and actually beleive its virtuous
What kind of woman would kill her own child? What kind of woman would sacrifice her own child to save herself?
A feminist woman.
Empty. Bereft. NPC.
Most modern young women. And most of the ones that wouldn’t are too cowardly to condemn it.
All the selfish people in the world.
100's of thousands of morally bankrupt woman a year.
It's murder because you are killing a person with seperate and unique dna.
Would you consider the morning after pill murder?
@@dream6562 The morning after pill kills a person with seperate and unique DNA. So yes, that is murder.
@@dream6562 Purely on a moralistic argument (so, separate from any legal precedent), my thought is you're facilitating the circumstances to minimize the chance of the fetus' survival. In essence, the comparison in my mind (were we speaking of an infant) would be finding the child left outside somewhere with just a wool sheet to keep it warm...and removing the sheet. You're not snuffing the life out, no, but you're demonstrating intent to prevent survival.
@@dream6562If the zygot has been conceived, then yes. Your actions are deliberately stopping the unique life continuing to gestate.
@@vajoynus idk personal level, I'm ok with it unless it's past 1st trimester
Yep… she’s evil.
It boils down to this; "I want to do whatever I want and I don't care who it harms."
I agree with Andrew 100%
Me two! 😂lol.
Classic Democratic/feminism logic….”It’s not murder the day before, because I said so.”
That is literally what she said. I will draw the line with no explanation whatsoever.
"It's not mur der the day before, because I want to do it." That is what she means but will not say. When she says, "You have to make the distinction somewhere", the distinction she makes is based solely on what is convenient for her. Ultimately, no moral, ethical or biological considerations seal the deal: what she wants is the determining factor. This is, indeed, the epitome of D fem "logic".
This woman is without a soul. Pure evil.
I don't think she actually thinks, she was taught something she believed blindly because it sounded good at the time. You can tell when people are thinking, this girl doesn't do that.
The mental gymnastics is unreal
The last 2 minutes was horrible for her. Self defeating in every aspect. The baby has its own heart beat pattern, responds to pain, touch and sound. That child is fully alive inside the womb. I hope she has a change of heart one day.
Most of them are like that.🤣
If she was the pregnant woman, one day before her baby was to be born (due date), and she was assaulted, resulting in the baby’s death, you can bet the farm that she would want the charge to be murder….
She already has a change of heart. It's obvious she knows it's murder. She's just doing the teenage "it's not my problem" routine.
Hopefully she isn't presented with the choice to act on her denial until she matures a bit more.
She says "you have the draw the line somewhere". No lady. You dont. Stop drawing lines. Life begins at conception. Theres your line. Dont cross it.
So wait, if I pay $200 I can interrupt a conversation with any drivel?
Sick young woman...I pray she changes her views before she brings children Into the world
Sounds like she already got rid of a few.
@@kgar5String it's very possible. May be why she won't concede she is scared to think she has murdered her own child/children. Very sad
I hope she has none
This is highly likely. She just gas light herself into thinking she did no wrong.
"It has to come out to be considered a person." Wow, so even if an unborn child possesses all signs of life the day before delivery, she doesn't think the kid has the right to be assigned personhood? WTF
Like the guy said personhood in the first place is a nothingburger word. It's just a tool to conveniently make their point when they deem it convenient
Arguing that unborn children do not have a right to life because they are not persons is literally the same argument they used to justify slavery. Personhood is a legal standard. Not a biological one. There was a time in this country when black people were not legally considered persons. This logic is morally disgusting
She says "I think..." so many times. She has no evidence, no facts, no understanding of the law, and of human development.
This woman is pure Evil. I do not understand how one can justify the killing of another person, just to put a line, in order to legislate the abortion. This is a life of person and one must take it seriously.
She just wants to be liked
People without children should not decide when life begins.
God is the one who decides when life begins, people should decide how the baby gets there and stop that process before it happens.
@@kgar5String Huh?
@@lesterven1847 He's arguing for control by the church.
What an absolute slap in the face to parents and especially the women who mourn a miscarriage or stillbirth. I cannot wrap my head around the thought of someone who is pro-abortion, genuinely empathizing with those mourning after a miscarriage, as they don't see the loss of a person/human being at all. If someone who is pro-abortion is consistent in their belief, then they'd say that there's no need to mourn over a clump of cells; a non-person. They genuinely cannot be a safe place for mourning parents.
Taylor Swift you are making yourself look bad! Just shut your mouth!
More like Taylor Slow.
@@DestroyerOfWombs Nice one!😆
HAHAH
@@DestroyerOfWombs ayooooo, ALSO THAT NAME HOLY.
When it comes to higher education I hope she kept the receipt.
What a waste of money and time.
Well, sleepy Joe is going to forgive her student debt soon.🤣
@@salguodrolyat2594 as I said to an ex who was convinced that their would be “forgiven”
Wish with one hand and shit in the other, see what one fills up first
@@focusedonfuture3255 🤣👏
These pro abortion people never want to discuss how abortions can negatively affect the mothers health too.. abortions aren’t a simple procedure by any means
Or how the baby got there
The one thing that was never said is that about every state will charge a drunk driver with double vehicular murder if he kills the mother and unborn child.
The lady is embarrassing herself here. The minute before the child is born it doesn't exist according to her. But the minute after it does. What sort of morality or intelligence is that. Children can live from 24 weeks. She is such a zealot with her ideology that she can't even navigate a fundamental question on the value of life and provide an ethical answer for the human rights of the unborn. It just exposes her and other zealots for having no reasoning behind their position. Its all ideology and no morals, ethics, intelligence or about being human.
She's so awful; she agreed with being ignorant on all the definitions that mattered and still wanted to die on the hill. She's a solipsist. People like her are beyond immature.
If you pause the video and look in her eyes without listening to the conversation, you can see the void. No kindness there at all.
Her argument made my head hurt. How can you base an argument on personhood but not define or classify what a person is? Make it make sense!
It is impossible to argue rationally with a woman arguing emotionally.
You don't give rights to non-persons???? In many places, ANIMALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN PEOPLE!!!!!
This is just a joke, people like her state the case for an abortion.
The way people will just vehemently defend an argument that has been debunked 4 different ways is just wild.
I don't understand why none of the women on @whatever can't just shut up for a minute, sit back in their chair and say
"You know what? You've given me a lot to think about. I'm going to spend some time considering my opinions more carefully before I debate them."
It's like they're incapable of admitting they're wrong, ill informed or just don't know. There's nothing wrong with being wrong as long as you learn from it.
This young lady without probably being conscious of it, is borderline evil
Absolutely
Borderline? She is.
Just evil. Not borderline. Her saying it nicely and couched in PC terms doesn't change the evil.
The fundamental point is the denial of what is a human. All the arguments they bring forth is to avoid the main question of when is it a human.
She keeps saying:"we have to draw the line somewhere". Why? Why should we draw the line? Just because you could feel slightly better with yourself killing your own child out of absolute self-interest? Disgusting
She keeps saying "child"
I wouldn't even argue with someone like this.
“And it was not Adam who was deceived by Satan. The woman was deceived, and sin was the result.”
1 Timothy 2:14 NLT
Adam’s sin wasn’t any better. He also tried blaming the woman AND God after he willfully disobeyed despite Adam being the one having received the direct order to not eat from the tree so he knew better. That’s the difference. Yet sin is sin. All disobedience is a sin
“It’s better to live alone in the desert than with a quarrelsome, complaining wife.”
Proverbs 21:19 NLT
@@shayalynntouched female emotions there lmao
In order for an organism to be considered alive, it must be able to grow maintain homeostasis and respond to stimuli, an embryo does all these things
Great point! If the “pro abortion logic” isn’t backed by religion OR science, then what is it backed by? Selfish peoples opinions?
An embryo only maintains homeostasis from its mother, it consumes nutrients through the the umbilical cord that the mother gives. If the embyo is removed it is not a viable any longer. Living things grow, mantain homeostasis on their own, and reproduce. Embryos cannot do that on their own.
She has no idea what the basis of her opinions are. Her ego has adhered to some ideology that can only be defended with arbitrary definitions, and nothing convincingly rational.
Why do people get put on trial for double murder when a woman is murdered while pregnant?
Doesn't matter what... her whole point is to unalive the baby no matter what...
Ask her the same question when she is 9 months pregnant!!
She’d give the same answer, or change it and say, “well I wouldn’t do it but it is (insert leftist my body my choice garbage).
Can't you post any news article where woman get a 9 month abortion?
She will have that abortion at nine months easily and not lose any sleep over it. But a year later, she will definitely blame the father for it.🤣
@@javierarce86the Montreal Gazette and the Denver Times both have articles about women having abortions at 32 weeks and 35 weeks. Google it.
@@javierarce86yt strikes again.
The Montreal Gazette and the Denver Times both have articles of women going through with it at 32 weeks and 35 weeks.
There is a good term for her position. It isn't that she is uninformed,unsure,uncomfortable,or unaware. It is that she is evil.
The mental gymnastics that they have to do to rationalize/justify abortion is stunning.
What if an ex boyfriend causes injury (and the baby dies) so he doesn't have to pay maintenance. The girl is saying that he should just be charged with assaulting a pregnant woman? Where is the human rights there? Protection of the mother? Protection of the baby? Womens rights? How absolutely horrendous the outcomes would be with that law change. She has no thought or intelligence.
Her whole argument - You have to draw the line somewhere. Nuts to hear her twisted logic.
It would be "distasteful" to kill a baby 1 day before birth but not murder. so stupid.
Yeah we draw the line at conception lol
All women have this twisted logic.
So you cannot kill a "person," but can kill a "human?" What kind of crazy is this?
i'm flabbergasted. She's complete lost and deceived.
We're fucked
The donation voice is extremely annoying and intrusive. Really. Bryan needs to fix that crap
That was a BRILLIANT question
Literally what delusional insanity looks like
She said you just have to make it up.
I think Andrew is the new Jordan P of debating facts these days.
This guy slays and cooks big time. Indeed. A heavy weight champion. Beacon of rationality. So eye opening how far he can go.
Absolutely insane what people will convince themselves is okay
She doesn't even believe her own logic. Her reasoning drips of the understanding that abortion is murder, but she won't say it because it takes away her ability to absolve herself of responsibility.
Her face says it all.
She's defaced her body with tattoos. I think the tattoos show that she is not of a sound mind.
2:41 lmfaooo andrews face
So kill no persons, but we cant define person. Also, ban assault weapons, but we cant define assault weapon...
This is what happens when one thinks they are philosophical and rational just to excuse responsibility.
The devil comes with a sweet smile👹👹👹
I can’t even listen to what she’s saying!!
I know a big part of her heart and soul has died while trying to answer some of these questions in order to save her disgraceful face.
Agreed
I love when he does these head to head arguments; and I really appreciate both sides and their stances and how they justify their responses
4:06 what about c-section babies.. aren’t they a person.
If a babys heart is beating, is that not a human being.
Life begins at conception. Saying a 3 month old inside the womb means less than a 3 month old outside of the womb is idiotic. Same baby...different stage of development. When a person feels this way then they are saying that a 2 year old is less significant than an 18 year old. Same human....different stage of development. Each stage is necessary to reach the next. You cannot bypass one stage to get to a stage where abortion supporters feel that the human is actually a human. Stopping development at any stage is murder. Fyi...all babies must be delivered. To purposely end that life in the case of the mother's health is not necessary.
The SA question that he threw back at her was brilliant. No amount of word salad or mental gymnastics could rescue her from her glaring contradiction in morality.
I am changing my existence calibration, I was born in November but that government has no right to tell me that my existence is only valid from birth. I am 9 months older than my birth, I have been a human for 9 months longer than my birth. I hate my birth date because it is a false age, it is not my real age.
This girl is sπupid
No. She's smart. What she is, is an evil monster.
Causal talking about killing a baby is sickening. Even worse I women who celebrate it. I hope this young women learns and grows. It’s not women’s rights, it’s human rights!
I had sever preeclampsia and was told that if I didn’t birth my child, I would probably die on the operating table but my son would live….I chose my son and yes I got close and lost a lot of blood and so on but I chose my child. A good mother will ALWAYS chose her child. Now I have a beautiful and healthy baby boy and I’m great too.
This woman is making such insane and stupid points.
It's an evil world out there.
Wow. Does she not remember that a certain demographic used to not be considered full persons? 😂 she'd fit right into the confederate South
I appreciate how Andrew employs logic to skillfully reveal that these women are not fully informed on the topics they are discussing.
Personhood is a dehumanizing term.
Crazy!!! Killing a baby A day before the baby is born is not murder because she doesnt view the baby is a person? This is absolutely insanity
She needs to stop saying "I Think"
Because she clearly does not.