It is rare for a person to accurately describe the beliefs and practices of a religious group other than his own. I have had enough family member, friends and neighbors who are members of some of these groups and I have attended the meetings and asked questions of the members of enough other groups that I can say with some confidence that you have generally avoided the temptation to misrepresent groups to which you do not belong. Thank you for that.
@@hosha9 I was born in the Midwest (U.S.A.). I have trouble understanding some people’s English, even the English of many of the people in Maine, where my wife and I live now. I also don’t like dogmatism. I’m 77 and the older I get the less I like it. So it didn’t take me long to give up watching the video you suggested. I do, however, want to thank you for making the suggestion. I have the book The Meaning of The Holy Qur’an - an English paraphrase by ‘Abdullah Yusuf ‘Ali and I have read it. My opinion is that if someone reads the Hebrew Bible first, then the Gospels, then the Epistles and then the Apocalypse (Revelation), he is likely to get a very different understanding of the Bible than if he first reads the Gospels and the Epistles. I think something similar may be true with regard to reading the Qur’an (or, in my case, reading an English paraphrase thereof). It seems to me that some Muslims teach their children the first parts of the Qur’an while not putting much emphasis on the later parts. Conversely, some Muslims emphasize some of the later surahs so much as to give their children a very different understanding of Islam. I’m not promising to read it but, if you have a way of sending a transcript of the video, I may find the time to read at least part of it.
@@EmilyS-gk3st Protestant Traditionalist vs. Contrarianian vs. Reformist Numerous “definitions” of the Protestant Reformation describe it as something that occurred in the sixteenth century. Multitudes of people are content to adopt only those doctrines taught by one or more of the sixteenth century reformers. Let’s call them protestant traditionalists. One Lutheran told me any doctrine not taught by Martin Luther isn’t important. Do you agree that no reforms are important except those adopted in the sixteenth century? Have you read or heard that the Pilgrims who came to North America aboard the Mayflower and settled in what is today Plymouth, Massachusetts adopted several additional reforms? Some people learn about the beliefs and practices of the seventeenth century Plymouth colonists and conclude that the ideal religious perspective is to discard every doctrine of the Roman Church. For our purposes here, let’s call such people “contrarian”. Do you agree with the contrarians? Because I don’t agree with either the protestant traditionalists or the contrarians, I find it difficult to describe my perspective on this subject. I’m considering calling myself a “reformist”. Many people have been taught that Jesus discarded the religious beliefs and practices and prohibitions of the Hebrew patriarchs and prophets of antiquity in favor of an entirely new religious system. I don’t agree with that either. Instead, I think of the teachings of Jesus as building on - even enhancing - the faith of Abraham. I think of the Wesley brothers as building on the faith of Martin Luther. And I think twenty-first century protestants should continue the reformation by building on the reforms with which we agree but without necessarily discarding ALL of the beliefs and practices and prohibitions of previous generations. Most people who agree with me about this will, of course, not call yourselves “reformists”. You probably don’t want to have to explain the sense in which you are using that word. I, for one, am not comfortable with any of the labels with which other people are comfortable. I called myself a protestant for several decades but almost everyone else thinks that means I’m a protestant traditionalist or a contrarian. So far as I know, “reformist”, isn’t a label adopted by someone else. If I do begin describing myself that way, how long do you think it will take for someone else to try to define it in a way entirely different from what I intend it to mean?
@@rogermetzger7335 I was more talking about your original comment on the top, I hardly read what you said in the second one. I watched this video all the way through, and I don't agree with all the doctrines discussed, but I do agree it's more common for people to misrepresent a faith they're not a part of than represent it objectively like they were here. In answer to your questions: 1.-Of course I consider reforms after the 16th century important! I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, which was founded in 1830, but I believe is Christ's original Church restored to the Earth. 2.-I don't know what reforms the early American Pilgrims did, so I can't say whether or not I agree with them. I may look into it! I don't agree that Jesus was tossing aside everything the Hebrews had, either. In fact, in my reading of the New Testament, it seems He had great respect for the Law of Moses. What Jesus didn't have respect for was the hypocrisy that the Jewish leaders of the time had. I agree with you on that Jesus' teachings build on the Law of Moses rather than tear it down!
@@cantona222 that was a single pope who did that and was never part of the church in any way. Theres a lot to critizse catholics on theology, but that's not one of them. Same way no one considers kenneth copland to be a representive of protestants
Was the Pope infallible when he burnt people at the stake for translating the bible into English, when he decreed that Europeans could invade other countries, when he owned slaves? Just asking.
As a Southern Baptist who comes from hundreds of years of Southern Baptists, this guide was a very helpful quick outline that helps me to understand a little bit more about my fellow believers of other denominations! Thanks a bundle, IAYTD!
There was no such thing as the trinity in the beginning Church. The apostles doctrine is all they preached until the Catholic started changing everything.
@@xx_somescenecath0lic_xx888 Catholicism is the falls Church of Rome. They came out after the apostle's passed away. They ran around changing the apostles doctrine to their way of deception.
Not bad for a brief overview! As a Presbyterian minister I would have liked to see more of the diversity of the Presbyterian and Reformed traditions, but a good introduction to most branches, indeed.
Jonathan Barb - I was raised in a Presbyterian church, but the definition/description of "predestination" provided in this video differs from that which I was taught at my church. Since you are a Presbyterian minister, perhaps you can enlighten me. The way I understood it, Presbyterians believe in predestination in the following way (I'll articulate it in my own words and trust that you can place it into context with the official wording) - We are beings with free will. Some will exercise that free will to do good things; others will exercise it to do bad things. But since salvation is determined by faith and acceptance of Christ as our savior, our chosen acts (good or bad) are not determinant. That is, nobody is predestined for salvation based on acts or behaviors. Nor are we predestined at birth. A person becomes predestined for salvation upon accepting Christ and, by extension, accepting the role as a an agent of God. That person, now predestined for salvation, exercises free will. Of course, our savior would prefer for that person's exercise of free will should be to commit acts of good. But whether the acts of this person are good, bad, or mediocre, God uses those acts to bring other souls to Christ. In that way, the predestined soul is an agent of the Trinity. And because he/she has made the conscious decision to accept Christ, that acceptance is what leads to salvation. Is this the way the Presbyterian Church still teaches it? I ask for your input because I have been overseas for almost two decades - far from any Presbyterian congregation. I truly have almost no connection to that church anymore.
If I am born again, saved by faith alone why can't I now spend all my time in a Catholic Church? I am born again and saved right. So now that I am born again why is it ok for me to do NO works and spend all my time in a downtown Bar but not ok to do Good works and spend all my time in a downtown Catholic Church?
@Cerij Andabad The Catholic Church took out hundreds of pages and made up verses that make no sense. At 1 time many years ago, the Catholic Church wasn’t ruled by satanic psychopaths. But that was long ago.
@Krisbugajew11-11 I believe you're confused who said "Follow Jesus Teachings Exactly" if you're referring to achieving salvation well it's not to difficult to understand repent and "learn" of his Teachings
The central thing that is always overlooked in explorations of Christianity is that most people are the denomination they are simply based on what church dominated the country that the majority of their ancestors came from. Only people who take the time to ask themselves "hey...does this denomination REALLY teach what I believe ?" are ones who might switch from what was handed down to them. Either that or they may switch because they married someone from a different denomination, and they just agree to do so to keep the peace with their spouse. Roughly and generally speaking, if the majority of your ancestors came from Ireland (except for Northern Ireland), Italy, Poland, France, Belgium, southern Germany or Austria, Slovenia, Croatia, Czechoslovakia or if you are Hispanic, you will almost always be Roman Catholic and never question it. If they came from Greece, the Ukraine, Russia or Serbia, you will be Eastern Orthodox. If they came from northern or central Germany or the Scandinavian countries, you will be Lutheran. If they came from England or Wales, you will be Episcopalian or Methodist, or perhaps Baptist if you live in the southern states in the US, or you are living in the state of Utah, you will most likely be a Mormon. If they came from Africa and you are Black, you will probably be Baptist, Pentecostal or Methodist. If they came from Scotland or the Netherlands or are Scotch-Irish from Northern Ireland, you will be Presbyterian or Reformed. And so on and so forth. And in almost every case, you will never question if the given denomination teaches what you truly believe.
@@Shindler39 Good on you for continuing to search Shindler. I think of it a bit like a pixelated photo. As the pixels get smaller and smaller, the detail becomes clearer and clearer. Maybe over time, you will add more and more pixels to your photo. That's what Catholicism is for me - a much clearer picture that is simply beautiful to behold and reveals the true glory of God.
@@Shindler39 Yes I have been Shindler. When I was getting married however, my fiancé went to a Pentecostal church (she had been raised Catholic and had been drawn away by her sister in law) so I went along a few times with her. To be blunt, all that seemed to happen was that they sang a few pop songs over and over and over for what seemed an eternity, then they were given what I call an "Amway" sales talk that lasted for forty minutes and that was it. I find it telling that all those churches have a "stage" where we have an altar which to me sums it up. Because she had left the faith, it made me research what it was that they were being taught and why - this was before the internet - so I managed to track down a book called Catholicism vs Fundamentalism which really explained the differences beautifully, including all the scriptural references that the Church draws on to arrive at the Catechism. One of the things that fascinated me was that she had obviously been indoctrinated about all the "evils" of the Catholic church and yet I had never once heard anything "anti Protestant" preached in all my years of attending a Catholic Church, so I was at a complete disadvantage to begin with. All I really knew about Protestantism was that there were a multitude of different denominations and they couldn't agree among themselves, except that they didn't accept the authority of the Pope as head of the Church, they didn't believe in the true presence of Christ in the Eucharist and that some of them didn't believe in the baptism of infants. That was about it really. On the few occasions I had been in a Protestant church (with the exception of the Anglicans) they were very plain and dull and certainly didn't move me spiritually in the way a Catholic church does. While many people criticise the Church for its art, most forget that it stretches back into the dark ages as a way of telling the stories from the bible to people who couldn't read. Similarly, the churches were built by the local people who gave what they could to try to glorify and honour God and looked on it as the one piece of true beauty they could enjoy in their hard life. So while people criticise "the Church" for its wealth, it is owned by the very people who participate and has been accumulated over centuries. When, a few years ago we went to Rome and visited St Peters, I can recall thinking to myself "This is mine!" Who are we to disparage and belittle the faith of those who have gone before us? Beauty is a gift from God, as are our talents. Look at the music that has been written for the Church - it is just one expression of art as sculptures, architecture and painting are all other expressions, equally valid. So by using our talents in this way to honour God to me just makes sense. Lastly, there are now so many really coherent and respectful Catholic apologists you can watch on CZcams who can explain the faith and refute the disinformation (or in newspeak "Fake News") I would encourage you to really research into the explanations they give to Protestant objections. I believe you will discover a richness and beauty in the faith that is there for the asking, which goes back to my original point about the pixelated photo. Why eat at McDonald's when there is a Michelin starred restaurant right next door...
@@Shindler39 If you want to grow as a Christian WITHIN the Church, have a look at all the programmes they have to offer - retreats, study courses, both online and if you are lucky at a physical location near you. There is a wealth of stuff available but sometimes I think the Church has gotten so well organised with it, it is too "corporate" and feels removed from the day to day experience of an average parishioner. It is yours to discover though. For me, it really comes down to a matter of Sanctification. We are on a spiritual journey through our lives here on earth trying to become like Christ. Each time we sin, it slows down our progress towards total holiness. That's why I so appreciate the sacraments the Church offers - Holy Eucharist, Confession and absolution, Marriage - and who wouldn't want to have Annointing and Last Rites? This is all part of the richness of the faith that you simply don't get in Protestant churches. It's a bit the same with the idea of Purgatory, (you know the one - ask your Baptist friends and they will have a heart attack LOL) but I really believe that when we leave this world, as believers, we are drawn to God, but first we are confronted by those things that maybe we never truly repented - pride being foremost among them. This realisation of those transgressions makes us ashamed and gives us the opportunity to truly and fully repent before God. That's what purgatory means to me. The final cleansing before being one of the saints. Therefore the further along we are on our spiritual journey here on earth, the less we have to confront when we finally get to the other side. All the tools in the Church help in this journey and there are so many more of them than what I see in any Protestant Church. It's like trading down from a Mercedes to a Hyundai - they are both cars, but we all know which one we would rather have. Lastly I would say to you, don't let the sin of pride get in your way - if in your heart you are being drawn back to the faith, then swallow your pride and embrace it. You will get even more out of your journey back into the Church having stepped out - just re-read the story of the Prodigal Son. I am praying for you...
This is a fine observation. It seems the younger generation today is becoming more inter-denominational. I think if anything, this is the hope for authentic Protestant unity
@David Ortiz no the term Lutheran came after luther. He did not want us to be called Lutheran. Ps the 2 years ago was the 500th anniversary of reformation was just fun fact not a conclusion
Born/raised Protestant and i find it odd that JWs would be considered under this umbrella. I would feel okayish walking into any of the other denominational churches but I would not a JW Kingdom Hall.
Yeah, neither JWs nor Christian Scientists are considered Protestant. They do not descend from the Reformation. If it were up to me, no Restorationist or Non-Denominational churches would use our Protestant label, either.
I took catholic classes because I thought, if I should begin searching for a church, why not go with the most oldest and ancient?? I learned an incredible amount of wisdom and knowledge from these classes about church history. My exposure to The Father's has given me insight into the legacy and witness all of us receive that has been passed down even to this day.... I just was not sold on the teachings of Mary, the pope, indulgences, and sacramentalism.... I may not agree, but who am I to say God isn't working through those churches???
@@stjepanpalinic3683 It's a religion. Orthodox Christianity, similar to Catholicism but in some ways we both are different(I'm a Catholic.) Whenever you hear the term Eastern Orthodox, it's these Orthodox Christians.
I can understand this from catechism of the reform church....our many churches CHRIST ➕ one church....as well as this verse "there are many ways of serving GOD ➕ as long as the same GOD ➕ is served...meaning FATHER,SON AND HOLY SPIRIT...so watchtower(Jehovah witnesses) definitely not part of christian protestant denomination
Thankyou I went to an unitarian church today- I was brought up roman catholic, my Irish mother is now Baptist, my dad Methodist, my nan was Pentecostal, my uncle Quaker. I am looking to find my way back to god, in whatever way that means to me now.
In other words, all came from the Catholic Church at some point... To me, a Church preceding all other "splits" have to be the one created by Christ originally. Scripture doesn't mention the need for future splits from the existing Church; on the other hand, plenty of warnings against false teachers. _(All protestant denominations have a man responsible for their creations, and most take place in modern days)_ Paul also states that there should _not_ be any schism among the faithful, so based on that, the actions of Luther and other reformers are highly questionnable; God never abandoned his people in times of error; he kept the same order of things but replaced leaders in their office. (Moses, David, Salomon, etc).
I find your statement that Luther, etc...are highly questionnable...because I have come to that same concllution after years of looking at their actions....thanx for stating a similiar position...
@Asaph Vapor Get your facts straight, Asaph. Acts 11: 26 mentions that THOSE in the Church were _called_ Christians (in Antioch). It was in no way the "name" of the Church. *Funny thing though:* The BISHOP of Antioch was Ignatius of Antioch, around 100 AD. He was taught the faith by John the apostle himself... and HE said the following: _"See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is administered either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude of the people also be; even as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. -Letter to the Smyrnaeans, Ch 8, 110~ AD"_ ...The Catholic Church, Asaph, and look at the year it was used. And it also shows an AUTHORITY of the Church, which you deny. (back then THE Bishop was a reference to the Pope) The word means "Universal" in greek, and was already used as a qualifier of the one true Church in the first century whether you agree with it or not. We used this name to identify ourselves, and stand out from those who would "claim" to be the "true church". _(against the docetists, Marcionists, early gnostics, etc)_ If you could talk with Ignatius, Asaph, what do you think he would say to you? Would you debate and deny his insights as well? _(Remember, no biblical canon back then; sola scriptura was not even possible)_
No denominational churches generally de-enphasise contentious issues that other denominations emphasise. They generally don't split hairs as long as you believe in an unearned grace-given salvation through belief in Jesus. Some do lean a bit pentacostal, with some speaking in tongues and emphasis on healing
I grew up going to Pentecostal churches but thankfully never saw anyone handling snakes. I’m also glad that you mentioned that Pentecostal churches vary a lot so not all Pentecostals speak in tongues etc.
I am Pentecostal as well but belong to Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee). The snake handling churches branched off from us in the early 20th century (as well as several other Pentecostal churches). A previous location of my church was about half a mile from a snake handling church but never was tempted to go into one. There are enough snakes in the (collective) church as it is.
JW's believe Jesus was executed on an upright "stake" without a cross beam. This is a major factor regarding them not having any crosses as a part of their faith. I was surprised that this video didn't mention that. I thought I would share.
Im apostolic pentecostal oneness we dont mess with snakes just those that have 2 legs arms and serpent head we cast out demons and preach the gospel we dont drink pioson or handle venomouse snakes thou shalt not tempt the lord thy God suicide is of the devil if you dont obey acts 2:38.you wont go to heaven you will go to hell you must be born again of water and the spirit we believe the whole bible 10 comms, prayer , foot washing, pray for the sick , witnessing worship Jesus our God we dont fallow the trinity
In all my years as a Seventh-day Adventist I have never heard of birthday celebrations being controversial. The majority of us keep Christmas and Easter. There are some dissenters and they are entitled to their opinions. I like the way you described Adventists.
Question: Is it true that your faith teaches that Jesus was crucified on a stake (or tree) like the Watchtower Society does or is that only their doctrine or belief??
@@tarlankasra ~ No we don't. We believe the cross was a traditional cross. As far as I know that is only their doctrine. Thanks for asking. Anything else?
I reckon you could look at what any non-deniminational church states their beleifs to be ( assuming they don't change from week to week) and find that they are already some version of an existing denomination.
Some churches that were of a denomination have dropped the affiliation and become non-denominational, often because of costs associated with the denomination.
The pentecostals can also be divided into two groups: Trinitarians and Oneness Pentecostals (also aka Apostolics). Where the main difference is the use of the name Jesus Christ at the moment of baptism vs. the use of the father son and the holy ghost during this rite.
I grew up in Apostolic movement in knew everybody else was either Catholic Baptist, episcopal, missionary Baptist. Mormon, JW and Calvary chapel, assembly of god monies, Buddhist, Muslims, native American church peyotes eaters atheists non believers communists in Mexico there all mostly RCC and santeria,
The Oneness Apostolic Pentecostal UPCI don't do handling snakes or drink poison, that's false interpretation of the word of God the snake cult is another type of people that lived in Appalachia they may be Jesus only or Trinity true Oneness don't fellowship with these cults
Denominations in Christiany is a sad reality. If Christians claims to worship one true God, Why are they so divided and not only worship as one Church.
One thing that divides denominations is how a pastor comes to serve a congregation. Catholics, Anglicans, and Methodists believe that a bishop should appoint a pastor to serve a congregation. Othe Protestant denominations believe that a congregation should call a minister to the pulpit. There are pros and cons to both ways to pick a pastor.
Its easy! Jesus started the Catholic church in 33ad. In 1517, Luther and protestants have been splintering ever since. Jesus only started one church... Catholic. #TruthBombs
So I tripped over your Mormon video, and couldn't decide whether you were speaking for or against Mormonism. I decided to check out the video regarding my own religion (this one) to see. You are right down the middle. Neither pro or con, just stating facts. I am HIGHLY impressed. You've earned a subscriber.
Matthew 16:18-19 "And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in Heaven.”
@@dumbdog611 yea I can't either. Good thing I have zero problem with any homosexuals at all and good thing I never judged anybody about it at all. Don't really understand what you were trying to get at with the response but if the Bible says homosexuality is wrong why would "followers of Christ" support homosexuality
I don't think it's always a case of supporting it but more a case of just accepting another person's choice. I'm of the opinion that we'll each get judged according to our own life and how we lived it. I don't think God is going to judge YOU based on how Johnny down the road lived his life. I also think having horrible thoughts or opinions about others is not very nice either, it's negative and invites evil.
The Catholic Church has always taught that you can not buy spiritual things although certain clergy at the time of the reformation may have pushed the idea, official Church teaching has always and always will be to the contrary. God gave us one Bread( the Eucharist) and made us one body( The Roman Catholic Church). He doesn’t desire us to not know what the scriptures and traditions teach so he gave the Magesterium to be his voice concerning faith, morals,doctrines, and dogmas (Mathew 18:18).
@kim burley if the church Jesus Christ started was not the Catholic Church show me the church he started historically from the beginning from one century to the next. Remember any Protestant Church started after the year 1520. As far as murder and pedophilia it is much more prevalent in Protestant churches than in the Catholic Church and that you can find that with a simple Google search. Uneducated people like you say such things. Murder and pedophilia is wrong no matter where it's at including the church Jesus Christ started
@kim burley you keep saying pedophile priests insinuating all priests are pedophiles. This shows your nonsense. There is more pedophilia hands-down in Protestant churches. This is fact and can be found by a simple Google search. I asked you to show me the church Jesus Christ started. It isn't an invisible Church. It was very visible starting with the apostles being the first Bishops. The Bible clearly states various churches in various cities. You are the one who is talking nonsense. This church started by Jesus Christ will be protected by him till the end of time. The only church started right from the beginning and can be seen in history is the Catholic Church. All Protestant churches of which you are part of started after the year 1520 because of Martin Luther's heresy. That bothers a Protestant like yourself quite a bit and this is why you say the nonsense you do
@Asaph Vapor the problem is Martin Luther's idea of justification did not come from the Bible but himself. You will not find Bible alone or faith alone for salvation in the Bible. As a matter of fact until the Catholic Church put the Bible together in about the year 400 ad Christian teaching was done by the church through sacred tradition. Jesus Christ never says everything you need to know will be written down in a book nor does his apostles. Faith alone is not in the Bible or was ever said by any of his apostles it always was faith and works together for salvation. Protestants like yourself are taught that Catholic Doctrine is not biblical when in fact everything the church teaches is in the Bible. Martin Luther did no Christian any good by his heresy. He separated Christianity through his Satan inspired idea of justification and you say that is good You are implying that Jesus Christ started a church and then forgot about it till Martin Luther came along 1520 years later. Baloney, he said he would protect it till the end of time and the Catholic church has stood this promise no matter what people like you say. Every Protestant church was founded after the year 1520 and the church you belong to today was founded by a man not Jesus Christ or the apostles. By the way, what Protestant Church do you belong to and why do you think it is the church started by Jesus Christ?
@Asaph Vapor one doctrine of faith that is in the Bible is the authority of the church. The Bible is all truth but is not the only truth it was never meant to be that. You are taught as a Protestant that scripture alone for everything you need to know and you disregard the authority of the church. Martin Luther did the same thing. New doctrines weren't invented. That is Protestant nonsense again something you were taught. I noticed you didn't tell me your Protestant denomination and why you think it's the church founded by Jesus Christ. Instead you say the Catholic Church is not the church founded by Jesus Christ when history shows it was
@Asaph Vapor all authority comes from God. Jesus Christ as God on Earth established his church and it's a visible Church. The apostles were the first Bishops and they anointed their successors who were the Bishops and Priests of the church. The church had structure and this is evident in the scriptures. The apostles defined Doctrine early on and there is an unending chain that can be seen in the Catholic Church which is the universal church. You still did not give me your Protestant denomination apparently you are ashamed of it
Including Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Scientology in Christianity would be like including Buddhism in Hinduism or Islam in Judaism; it demonstrates a categorical flaw in how you approached the study. Aside from that, the video was a really good introduction and I appreciate the work you did to compile and summarize the broad branches of Christianity.
Hi David! I included them because they identify as Christians, even though others may disagree. And I didn't include Scientology, but rather Christian Scientists. Two very different things!
As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints who has been immersed in the religion her whole life, I can say that the religion you called the slang term "Mormon" is very much a Christ-worshipping faith. The term "Christian" defines a follower of Christ, yeah? Well, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints very much encourages following Christ's teachings. Thus it is very much a Christian faith, although it may be a little different from the others doctrinally. If you don't believe me, why don't you look into the religion itself through the scriptures it teaches from? They encourage reading from the Bible. That much you can relate to. The Book of Mormon is about the ancient Americans, and is very much centered around Christ. The things it teaches are very much in harmony with what the Bible teaches.
@@EmilyS-gk3st Not even close. LDS preaches a different Jesus, not the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Following the teachings of Christ is not the belief that makes one a true Christian.
@@joycegreer9391 False. I have read both the Bible and The Book of Mormon. Both preach the same Jesus. I'm guessing you've never read The Book of Mormon?
I am from Catholic Church. We loves you so much. Altough in my country (Indonesia) doesn't have a lot of Orthodox Representation. I see most Orthodox teaching is agreeable in Catholics lens
@JESUS IS COMING SOON Orthodoxs has many common tradition with the catholics. So it's clearly wrong. Maybe in the past there were real Bible believing orthodox churches. But these days they just pray to icons, Mary and dead saints. This is unbiblical...
@@dimitartodorov4826 you obviously don't understand the earliest history, the first Icon was of The Holy Mother of GOD painted by the Apostle Luke, we don't worship Saints we venerate them , the Saints are our brothers and sisters in CHRIST, thy are family, yes we ask them to pray for us, do you ask people to pray for you ? do you not have pictures of family that you look at with love ? Do you know the first New Testament wasn't compiled until just after the year 400 by the church? Was the Church JESUS'S Apostles built wrong until Martin Luther came along ? People think they can understand the Bible with their own rational logic , while not understanding the mysteries of GOD , this is why branches have broken off and splintered into 10's of thousands of groups, I hope you search & find truth GOD BLESS 🙏
Seventh day adventists and JWs are not Protestant or Christian denominations. They are separate cults. Christians believe in salvation by grace through faith alone. Seventh Day Adventists have works based salvation and Jws have a completely rewritten Bible and belief system all together.
Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father (God) except through Me (Jesus). - John 14:6 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. - John 3:16 That if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. - Romans 10:9 Then Peter said to them, "Repent (turn away from sins), and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. - Acts 2:38 But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; - 1 Peter 2:9 For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39 Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord, shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' And then I wll declare to them, 'l never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!" - Matthew 7:21-23 And He said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect în weakness." Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. - 2 Corinthians 12:9 If you want to accept Jesus as Your Lord and Savior, say this prayer: Dear Lord Jesus, I know that I am a sinner, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe You, Jesus, died for my sins, are Lord, and God rose You from the dead. I turn from my sins and invite You to come into my heart and life. Jesus, I want to trust, accept, and follow You as my Lord and Savior. In Jesus's name, amen.
@الدين القيّم Mohammed will lead you to hell. Islam commands to kill unbelievers, christians and jews. Mohammed lived 600 years after Jesus's resurrection but he claims that Jesus didn't raise from the dead. Not today false prophet Mohammed!
@@wfalgo1 It doesn't need to be that specific prayer. Just sincerely believing the Gospel and trusting in Jesus as your Savior and Lord. You can do your own prayer.
Dude. Where are you getting your info? Catholics don’t and never did teach that indulgences were a way to “buy” your way into heaven. Nor that you can buy your salvation from works. Luther didn’t teach salvation by faith. He taught salvation from FAITH ALONE. The Catholic Church also never said that the Bible could only be read in Latin. In fact, Luther wasn’t even the first guy to translate the Bible into the vernacular (German). There already were MANY translations done by the Catholic Church in German. What the Church did say is that the scriptures must be proclaimed SPECIFICALLY IN THE LITURGY in Latin. Get your facts straight dude.
Hi there! That text was all provided by a Lutheran seminary student who volunteered their time, so I apologize if it's a little off. Maybe in an effort to break it down into laymen's terms it lost some of its clarity.
Indulgences definitely were a thing. The Church needed money and they took advantage of people by selling them. The idea was to reduce the punishment for your sins so you would spend less time in Purgatory when you died. The very sale of these indulgences went against God's words and against the teachings of the Church for years before that point. Luther had a very legitimate complaint about it.
I grew up Southern Baptiat in NY. It was a small church. IDK what the Southetn part stands for. One set of my grand parents were of the " Bretheren". It was very different going to their church and I have no idea what it was about but children were kept in a seperate room. There were silent prayers and a lay preacher but different speakers at rge same time.
The difference between the Baptist and Southern Baptist churches was their stance on slavery and segregation. Want to take a guess which one was which?
@David Ortiz uhh no. God can heal, he can bring freedom from unclean spirits and the Holy Spirit gives the gift of speaking im tongues. Its not all God can do, he ccan do much more miracles, who are we to limit what wonders he can or cannot do
The Presbyterian and Calvinist Church of Scotland took the concept of Protesting to its logical conclusion and have had many, many schisms over the years. While some have re-united or merged with different branches over the years, have currently have The Church of Scotland (the National, but NOT established church), The Free Church, The Free Church (Continuing), The United Free Church, The Free Presbyterian Church, The Associated Presbyterian Churches, and The Reformed Presbyterian Churches. That's before you include the Scottish Episcopal Church - the only church in the Anglican Communion that is not a daughter church of the Church of England, but instead stems from parallel movements within the Scottish church when James VI ascended the English throne as James I. We also have two slightly distinct groups of Roman Catholics. Lowland Catholics, mostly descended from 19th Century Irish Immigrants to the big cities (though added to by Italians, Poles, Lithuanians, and Others over the decades) and Highland Catholics who are the last vestiges of Pre-Reformation Scotland. Because of the highly-Centralised nature of the Catholic church, the distinction is more cultural among the people (though most share the same Football team) We've quite a lot going on, especially considering only around 52% of our ~5M population identifies as Christian (going by 2011 census)
Really the only one is Johava witness because they deny our lord and savior. The majority of sects disagree on minors and agree on the majors. A few oddball that claim only thier sect saves but honestly those are cults and should be avoided. If you're interested I would suggest checking out a nondom go to a Bible study and see what Christian are really about. We are heavily misrepresented in media and the world. We just people that love God and love our neighbors.
If you are willing to take the time, I would reccomend buying a MacArthur study bible and reading it for yourself, seeing how it all connects. The Bible, being the core of Christian faith, would give the most straightforward account of Christianity.
To any Jehovah’s witness I ask how does Daniel 10:13 effect the way you see Jesus? The verse says: “But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.” So is Jesus just one of the chief princes? I encourage you to read this verse, in context, and understand who and what Jesus really is. Colossians 1:16-17 "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.” This verse shows that even Michael was created by Jesus. I pray that your eyes will be opened to who He is.
But the Father is greater than Jesus, meaning Worship should only be to the Lord of Lords which is God. By this, it only makes sense than Jesus is not God as God is the most high.
Thank you for not representing nontrinitarian viewpoints unfairly. Interestingly, the Church of Christ, Scientist is also nontrinitarian. I personally am a nontrinitarian Christian who is a member of the Disciples of Christ, a denomination that takes no stance on the trinity either way. Since every translation of the Bible has some verses that are clearly nontrinitarian and some verses that are clearly trinitarian, I believe that we should all be able to be considered true-believing Christians.
To be fair to Catholics, the Pope does not decide Catholic doctrine and he cannot change cannon law even if he does make an "ex cathedra" statement. (Only happened 5 times ever) Also, inferring Catholics place human authority as higher than the Bible is a mis-representation of their theology. I'm Protestant, but we need to stop mis-representing Catholics or putting words in their mouth based on our perceptions of them or "what a Catholic I know told me". Also, Lutheran's do not believe communion is literally the body and blood of Christ (transubstantiation). Luther taught consubstantiation, that Christ was spiritually present "in, under, and through" what continued to be bread and wine. So that was inaccurate as well.
I find it interesting that you state in the beginning that there are too many branches of Christianity, yet you throw in two non Christian faiths (Jehovah’s witnesses and Scientology). Why even have them in the video?
Hi Brian. I don’t include Scientology, I include Christian Scientists. And I’m including those faiths because THEY classify themselves as Christians. Protestants will always debate which denominations are valid and which aren’t, so I went off whether they consider themselves Protestant.
I Am Your Target Demographic ah ok. Overall I thought it was a good overview. Just hate it when groups that don’t believe Jesus is the Saviour are lumped in with Christians.
David Ortiz Mormons are not Christians. Adventist’s are as far as I understand what they believe. Mormonism does not follow Jesus Christ, they follow the teachings of their “prophets” which are in direct conflict with what Jesus taught.
@@joannechisholm4501 I've noticed you on a lot of comments if you find Christianity to be false why do you spend so much time communicating with them? If you have questions on how to become saved I would love to answer them and help lead you to Christ. You like me are a sinner and only he can save you.
saturday me too-a sabbatarian.i also admire j.w.s refusal to celebrate not only holidays, but birthdays. dont agree with their restriction on blood transfusion. always wondered what christian science believed.
While indeed “superficial,” the author entirely gets it WRONG regarding Luther and “indulgences.” In his thesis regarding the central or core issue, he called indulgences “trifles.” * Desiderius Erasmus was the Dutch humanist scholar hired by the Vatican in hopes of assassinating (intellectually) Reformer Martin Luther. Erasmus wrote his Diatribe to destroy the Protestants. Luther responded with his magnum opus Bondage of the Will which stands as the lighthouse of the Reformation. "Now, my good Erasmus, I entreat you for Christ's sake to keep your promise at last. You promised that you would yield to him who taught better than yourself. Lay aside respect of persons! I acknowledge that you are a great man, adorned with many of God's noblest gifts--wit, learning and an almost miraculous eloquence, to say nothing of the rest; whereas I have and am nothing, save that I would glory in being a Christian. Moreover, I give you hearty praise and commendation on this further account--that you alone, in contrast with all others, have attacked the real thing, that is, the essential issue. You have not wearied me with those extraneous issues about the Papacy, purgatory, indulgences and such like--trifles, rather than issues--in respect of which almost all to date have sought my blood (though without success); you, and you alone, have seen the hinge on which all turns, and aimed for the vital spot." M.Luther
Saved by Grace through Faith AND Works. _(the works aren't the main reason for salvation, although they are Biblically _*_necessary_*_ for salvation.)_
Basically they differ in how the church should be governed. But when it comes to salvation we all believe Christ is the key and that His grace is sufficient.
@Asaph Vapor The Protestant Reformation only OCCURED around 1517 or the 15th century. So NO Protestant Church can claim to be the TRUE Church of Jesus Christ since the Reformation only occured around the 1517, while our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and His apostles lived around 1st century AD. Heck Martin Luther and all the Reformers wasn't even alive in the 1st century AD, so how can you claim anti Catholic Prottie that Protestantism with all of 30 to 40,000 SECTS and CULTS is the truth?
The reason we have 40.000 churches and denominations because of rebbelion stiff neck , pride , love of the world , lust of the flesh lust of the eyes harden hearts my way or the highway we cant let go of our sin we love to.party idols the bigest idol is him who looks in the mirror who me and tradition my mother was catholic i wont change ill die a catholic stubborness which is witchcraft
Hmm...this is really an insightful video. I’m a bit disturbed though, especially with what Martin Luther said about how faith alone os one of the keys of being saved. To all Protestants, I want to ask directly does this mean that a sinner who believes in Christ will be saved rather than someone who has done many good deeds, even if the former has not been dedicated to God with his heart????
Yes. That is what it means, I personally do not agree with this. Some churches believe this but others don’t. I believe that yes faith has a big part but also you need to be kind and follow the example of Jesus. It doesn’t make sense to say that you accept god but then go around sinning
If a sinner believes in Christ and accepts His salvation he will be saved an a new creation. He needs to turn from his sinful lifestyle and follow Jesus.
@@EliteGaming110 indeed. You show your faith by your works. Faith without works is truly dead. However, we are not saved by our works, for we cannot save ourselves. We are saved by grace alone.
Accurate video but the Jehovas witnesses do not subscribe to the doctrine of the Trinity. You cannot be a Christian and not worship Jesus as your LORD and savior
Excellent, excellent video. Like others have said I think you did a great job at representing each denomination well and without any bias. Quick question, where does the Mormon Church fit in all of this?
@@joycegreer9391 poor Joyce the troll can’t even get one person to comment on her teachings is here to cry. Learn what comments are nobody watches your crap
@Asaph Vapor Mother Mary is and will be the queen of heaven ! And Jesus is the King ! You ppl cannot demean Mother Mary ! You ppl should give her respect !
@Asaph Vapor Psalm 45:9 - the psalmist teaches that the Queen stands at the right hand of God. The role of the Queen is important in God’s kingdom. Mary the Queen of heaven is at the right hand of the Son of God.
It's so funny that Protestantism started in large part because a Catholic Priest didnt understand the tenets of his own religion, so he started a new one. And then many people didn't like/understand his tenets, so they made a new one. Kinda telling when you think about it.
Wrong during the Middle Ages the Roman Catholic Church held a virtual monopoly of faith in Western Europe. However, between the 14th and 17th centuries a series of Northern European reforms led to what is now called the “Protestant Reformation” culminating in a mass exodus from the near total control of Christianity from Rome. The Reformation began in 1517 when Martin Luther, an monk, nailed 95 propositions to a church door in Wittenberg, Germany. These proposals for reform challenged many contemporary church practices. Committed to the idea that salvation only could be reached through faith and “divine grace”, Luther compiled the list of grievances known as the “Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences” -- The 95 Theses. It started as a movement against what its followers perceived to be errors in the Catholic Church. Protestants originating in the Reformation reject the Roman Catholic doctrine of papal supremacy, but often disagree amongst themselves. Martin Luther intent was to spark a debate within his church over a reformation of Catholicism. Instead, Luther and those who followed him found themselves at the forefront of a new religious movement.
@@Darth_Vader258 No, that is what the RCC did. Luther wanted reforms, not to leave the RCC. The Vatican refused any reforming. Others had tried before Luther and were burned at the stake by the RCC. Does killing those who disagree with you sound like any church that would be of Jesus??
2:04 Protestant does not mean protests the church. It refers to the protestation at speyer, and the protest was against a proscription of the evangelical faith in the HRE.
I AM GODIST. GOD IS LOVE. SO SIMPLE. GOD GUIDES I HIMSELF HIM ME. What A HEAVENLY GREAT break down. No JUDGMENT. Just HISTORY. WHO CONTROLS THE PAST CONTROLS THE FUTURE.
Independent Baptists predate the RCC and therefore all Protestants by MANY centuries...their local churches are autonomous as taught and they believe in the plenary inspiration of the Holy Bible....they separated themselves out from the SBC because the church as Christ established it has no set organization except the Pastor and the Body who all answer to Jesus the Son
The Catholic Church did not forbid the use of vernacular translations of the Bible. The Latin Vulgate was the official translation of the Bible but other AUTHORIZED versions were allowed. Of course scarcely anyone could read before the 19th century. Those that could read, COULD READ LATIN.
ilmaestro, sorry, but you are entirely incorrect. The Catholic church forbade translating, or even reading, the Bible in any other language than Latin, and this, at the pain of death. This is why both Wycliffe & Tyndale were persecuted and burnt (Wycliffe posthumously). It was only when they couldn't beat the demand for a vulgar tongue bible, that they produced the Duoauy Rheims around 1570+-, and even this was translated from Jerome's Latin Vulgate. But prior, any other Bible than the Vulgate was completely outlawed for a century.
I invite you to watch the series "A Lamp in the dark" by Chris Pinto. There are 3 videos available on CZcams and a 4th is coming up next year. Warning! each video is >2h because de necessary evidence to be presented. In addition, videos 2&3 have extra CDs of information but if you want them, you have to buy them from adullam.com
Guttenburg Bible was printed in 1453.......although translations were rare the RCC opposed the printing of the Bible into common tongue so the masses could read it for their own.....King John commissioned the most famous of translations in 1609 from which we get the modern Bible by that name.....the "modern translation Bibles" use a manuscript translated from some of the original scrolls by two Atheists......the KJV translators struggled and prayed with multiple groups to get their wording and meaning right to the spirit of the Bible......anyone using a modern "Bible" is using a counterfeit document MEANT to lead them astray
@@michaelkendall662 There is an error in nearly every sentence of this reply. For a start the English King John ruled during the beginning of the 13th Century. He signed the Magna Carta in 1215. If you respond to this I will go on pointing out your absurdities one by one.
I'm just going type this down. Idolatry, literally, is to not worship other deities. That's it. That means, yes, you can wear a cross or shawl. A cross, shawl or even the star of David, are in fact not idols; their literally by definition symbols not Idols. That's basically saying you can't learn Hebrew because Hebrew letters are actually symbols not letters. Which 96 percent of the entire old Testament, ove 70 percent of the holy bible, is written under. I truly hope people are actually reading this expression very carefully.
Fascinating and interesting video for a non religious person like me to make sense of so many denominations. Really well made. But also fascinating to think some of these beliefs are still taken seriously in the 21st century despite the unparalleled progress made in modern science in explaining the world around us, its really quite bizarre when you think about it seriously.
The hate against JWs. I'm not one and have meet less than 5 but show some respect. If they want to call themselves Christians let them. I'm Mormon myself and refer to myself as a Christian. I believe in Jesus Christ.
They are not Christian and neither are you, but we are both followers of Jesus Christ so I respect you for that and I respect your opinions, however being a Mormon and being Christian are two very different things and I see you do not know much about either if anything at all.
As a reformed Catholic (meaning I no longer have a practicing affiliation with Catholicism) I have much respect and admiration for Luther, but it in the end the spirituality that makes the most sense and has the most meaning for me is Deism/Pan deism.
I grew up Catholic and rejected it when I reached the age of reason but remained essentially Christian. When I was 19 I joined the Unification Church, you know the Moonies. I stayed with them for 3 years. I rejected them as a cult but still thought of myself basically a Christian
Continued- about 19 years ago it came to me as an epiphany - I had realized that all religion was man made and was more or less a method of control , that God created us with the ability to reason. Most religion is based on blind faith and hearsay. I believe in a creator and that if what you do is destructive is a “ sin”. And what is constructive is a “grace”.
I'm from the Philippines and very proud of my Carholic heritage. Roman Catholicism is the greatest legacy of Spain to the Filipino people. Gracias Spaña.
DashikiMe Clothing How can they be apostolic if they teach that *anyone* who believes we are saved by faith alone, a gift from God, through grace and not of our own works IS ANATHEMA? If someone adheres to what Paul wrote to the Ephesians (in chapter 2, verses 8-9), they are deemed accursed by the Catholic Church. Therefore, the Catholic Church cannot be apostolic.
@Asaph Vapor Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura is from Satan himself, and Martin Luther is in Hell. Protestantism is Satanism 40,000 CRAZY FANATICAL Protestants denominations all believing in Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura.
Just now seeing this years later, but @20:42-44 there's a correction to Jehovah's Witness belief. According to their belief, God never had a literal son. God created Michael the Archangel in the beginning, who He sent to earth in and became a physical form. While Michael had a physical body on the earth they called him Jesus and after his death he returned to being Michael. According to the Jehovah's Witness, Jesus was was not the literal Son of God, nor was Jesus God at any point as God never gave birth to anything. It is their belief that there is no trinity of God. One God in 3 forms, Father, Son, the Holy Spirit (or Soul, Body, Spirit). This is paramount in Christianity and any protestant denomination.
Many of these protestant churches work on people's emotions. Bible already prophesied, "For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry". 2Timothy 4:3-5 "if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God,the pillar and foundation of the truth" 1 Timothy. 3:15.
Actually the majority of Lutherans practice Apostolic Succession [not just the Church of Sweden] even in America [ELCA] but Lutherans view AS as a good and historic practice rather than the only way to govern the Church
What do you expect from denominations relying on Sola Scriptura and personal interpretations? Since all "claim" to be inspired, they can pretty much do anything while claiming to be inspired, and without a form of authority to stop them, they will keep doing it, and drag more people in their heresy.
I don't mean to insult anyone but these same mortal human priests also happen to be pedophiles and idolaters. If your teachers and the doctrine they teach bears such wicked fruits, ask yourself if indeed it is The Holy Spirit guiding them. The truth shall set us free. God's word and The Holy Spirit is enough for holiness and righteous life it just takes a believer to submit to God and resist the devil in order to clearly understand and follow God's commands. If the Holy Spirit is you, he will teach you and help you understand God's word including many things your pastor can ever teach you. God does not practice favoritism, he gives freely to everyone who asks him with a pure heart not only to priests or the pope.
@@MystoRobot I don't mean to insult anyone but these same mortal human priests also happen to be pedophiles and idolaters. If your teachers and the doctrine they teach bears such wicked fruits, ask yourself if indeed it is The Holy Spirit guiding them. The truth shall set us free. God's word and The Holy Spirit is enough for holiness and righteous life it just takes a believer to submit to God and resist the devil in order to clearly understand and follow God's commands. If the Holy Spirit is you, he will teach you and help you understand God's word including many things your pastor can ever teach you. God does not practice favoritism, he gives freely to everyone who asks him with a pure heart not only to priests or the pope.
@Lord Farquaad Sorry, youtube didn't send me a notice. Here's my answer: Tell me Farquaad... Wouldn't you want to know *with assurance* how you can avoid eternal damnation, and reach Heaven? Who's insights would you logically consider, then? *The Catholic Church:* 2000 years of documented existence, theological knowledge and unchanging dogmatic practices. Interpretations backed by and shared with the Early Church _(even in the first centuries)._ The New Testament canon was established and declared inspired/infallible through her authority. Sent thousands of missionaries all around the globe to preach the Gospel several centuries before the first ever protestant church even existed. *Joe Smith who lives down the street:* Was born in another denomination which originally spit from X... which split from X... which split from X... which originally split away from the Catholic Church less than 500 years ago. One day though, Joe decided that _HE_was inspired, and not the rest of his congregation. He began preaching on his own, starting a new denomination, calling it something like "New Reconstituted Baptist Fellowship of What Gives", which supposedly holds the fullness of the Truth, even though his teachings doctrinally differs from those of everyone else... and was never preached this way before. Oh, and he uses the Bible, but says the Catholic Church doesn't really understand the book they were inspired to compile. PS: if you're non-denominational, it doesn't change anything: you're just a church onto yourself. I seriously hope you see the God-willed purposed of ONE authoritative Church. *Scripture never suggested or prophesied the necessity for a schism...* though, *PLENTY of warning about false shepherds.*
You notice that everyone considers these as "beliefs?" A belief is different from understanding. Beliefs are feelings, hearsay, and hopeful wishes and not provable. Understanding can be demonstrated, proven, and scientifically explained. There haven't been any religious events that can meet the latter criteria.
That is a great idea, then everyone can learn about Ellen G White who made a bunch of prophecies which didn't actually come true. More 7th day Adventist should learn their church history.
You need to really study that out yourself. The Bible says keeping the law is a curse and it is not of faith. The Sabbath day is supposed to be kept everyday in our hearts not according to the old law.
@@michaelzimmerman8959 read in the Epistles of Paul his struggles with the Judaizers trying to corrupt the recently saved by preaching salvation through the practice of the law rather than faith
@@adancitomaldonado2198 when Jesus was resurrected it was on SUNDAY and thereafter it has been called the LORD's day which is why we practice the worship of His church on that day....the KEEPERS of the law still observe the Sabbath
All of you church leader at every level must begin to repent. Yes, every denomination, every church, every pastor, everyone. From genuine life changing repentance comes the seeking the face of the Lord. From life altering repentance comes the asking of the Holy Spirit to purify your entire being and then dwelling within always. This is when a very real revival can begin. But, first the old dead you must die and become like ash blown by the Holy Winds of God. This must begin in every denomination, every church, every pastor, every theologian, everyone.
What "Speaking in Tongues" originally & actually was & is / mean(t/s) to speak to the Audience in their Tongue; as they speak. That is, in such a way as they would in their own home. And those who have eyes to see and ears to hear in order to, "read the room" so-to-speak, do that more easily. Today, we call that, "Code Switching". Getting up in front of everybody and trying to play Van Halen's "Eruption" on the mouth organ may have a personal benefit and even a social benefit but, that's not what Speaking in Tongues truly is. It is the way in which the Conveyor of the Word is best presented as Shepard and Angel.
The lost man has been found When he spoke it was Like thunder and in the distance a Voice Could be heard the fallen shall no longer be downtrodden They shall be lifted up
It is rare for a person to accurately describe the beliefs and practices of a religious group other than his own. I have had enough family member, friends and neighbors who are members of some of these groups and I have attended the meetings and asked questions of the members of enough other groups that I can say with some confidence that you have generally avoided the temptation to misrepresent groups to which you do not belong. Thank you for that.
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
@@hosha9 I was born in the Midwest (U.S.A.). I have trouble understanding some people’s English, even the English of many of the people in Maine, where my wife and I live now.
I also don’t like dogmatism. I’m 77 and the older I get the less I like it.
So it didn’t take me long to give up watching the video you suggested. I do, however, want to thank you for making the suggestion.
I have the book The Meaning of The Holy Qur’an - an English paraphrase by ‘Abdullah Yusuf ‘Ali and I have read it.
My opinion is that if someone reads the Hebrew Bible first, then the Gospels, then the Epistles and then the Apocalypse (Revelation), he is likely to get a very different understanding of the Bible than if he first reads the Gospels and the Epistles.
I think something similar may be true with regard to reading the Qur’an (or, in my case, reading an English paraphrase thereof). It seems to me that some Muslims teach their children the first parts of the Qur’an while not putting much emphasis on the later parts. Conversely, some Muslims emphasize some of the later surahs so much as to give their children a very different understanding of Islam.
I’m not promising to read it but, if you have a way of sending a transcript of the video, I may find the time to read at least part of it.
I agree with what you said here!
@@EmilyS-gk3st Protestant Traditionalist vs. Contrarianian vs. Reformist
Numerous “definitions” of the Protestant Reformation describe it as something that occurred in the sixteenth century. Multitudes of people are content to adopt only those doctrines taught by one or more of the sixteenth century reformers. Let’s call them protestant traditionalists. One Lutheran told me any doctrine not taught by Martin Luther isn’t important.
Do you agree that no reforms are important except those adopted in the sixteenth century?
Have you read or heard that the Pilgrims who came to North America aboard the Mayflower and settled in what is today Plymouth, Massachusetts adopted several additional reforms? Some people learn about the beliefs and practices of the seventeenth century Plymouth colonists and conclude that the ideal religious perspective is to discard every doctrine of the Roman Church. For our purposes here, let’s call such people “contrarian”.
Do you agree with the contrarians?
Because I don’t agree with either the protestant traditionalists or the contrarians, I find it difficult to describe my perspective on this subject. I’m considering calling myself a “reformist”.
Many people have been taught that Jesus discarded the religious beliefs and practices and prohibitions of the Hebrew patriarchs and prophets of antiquity in favor of an entirely new religious system.
I don’t agree with that either. Instead, I think of the teachings of Jesus as building on - even enhancing - the faith of Abraham. I think of the Wesley brothers as building on the faith of Martin Luther. And I think twenty-first century protestants should continue the reformation by building on the reforms with which we agree but without necessarily discarding ALL of the beliefs and practices and prohibitions of previous generations.
Most people who agree with me about this will, of course, not call yourselves “reformists”. You probably don’t want to have to explain the sense in which you are using that word.
I, for one, am not comfortable with any of the labels with which other people are comfortable. I called myself a protestant for several decades but almost everyone else thinks that means I’m a protestant traditionalist or a contrarian. So far as I know, “reformist”, isn’t a label adopted by someone else.
If I do begin describing myself that way, how long do you think it will take for someone else to try to define it in a way entirely different from what I intend it to mean?
@@rogermetzger7335 I was more talking about your original comment on the top, I hardly read what you said in the second one. I watched this video all the way through, and I don't agree with all the doctrines discussed, but I do agree it's more common for people to misrepresent a faith they're not a part of than represent it objectively like they were here. In answer to your questions:
1.-Of course I consider reforms after the 16th century important! I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, which was founded in 1830, but I believe is Christ's original Church restored to the Earth.
2.-I don't know what reforms the early American Pilgrims did, so I can't say whether or not I agree with them. I may look into it!
I don't agree that Jesus was tossing aside everything the Hebrews had, either. In fact, in my reading of the New Testament, it seems He had great respect for the Law of Moses. What Jesus didn't have respect for was the hypocrisy that the Jewish leaders of the time had.
I agree with you on that Jesus' teachings build on the Law of Moses rather than tear it down!
Proudly a Catholic.. l love those who believe in the birth, Death, and resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.
What about paying money to guarantee heaven. Where do Catholics stand on it now. Genuine question. I'm here to learn.
@@cantona222 that was a single pope who did that and was never part of the church in any way. Theres a lot to critizse catholics on theology, but that's not one of them. Same way no one considers kenneth copland to be a representive of protestants
Was the Pope infallible when he burnt people at the stake for translating the bible into English, when he decreed that Europeans could invade other countries, when he owned slaves?
Just asking.
@@jjpower6769 not Catholic but no, the pope is not always infallible as pope
@@jjpower6769 that is a lie more prot lies you will be Protestants or whiners as. I call you
As a Southern Baptist who comes from hundreds of years of Southern Baptists, this guide was a very helpful quick outline that helps me to understand a little bit more about my fellow believers of other denominations! Thanks a bundle, IAYTD!
Please Please Please convert to Catholicism. It is the one true church.
There was no such thing as the trinity in the beginning Church. The apostles doctrine is all they preached until the Catholic started changing everything.
@@xx_somescenecath0lic_xx888 Catholicism is the falls Church of Rome. They came out after the apostle's passed away. They ran around changing the apostles doctrine to their way of deception.
Michael Zimmerman Why do you rely on your understanding? I would suggest asking God about that
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
Not bad for a brief overview! As a Presbyterian minister I would have liked to see more of the diversity of the Presbyterian and Reformed traditions, but a good introduction to most branches, indeed.
Acts 2:38 is the only doctrine, and nobody can change that. And they all continued steadfastly in the apostles doctrine;
Jonathan Barb I invite you to Catholicism! :D
Jonathan Barb - I was raised in a Presbyterian church, but the definition/description of "predestination" provided in this video differs from that which I was taught at my church. Since you are a Presbyterian minister, perhaps you can enlighten me.
The way I understood it, Presbyterians believe in predestination in the following way (I'll articulate it in my own words and trust that you can place it into context with the official wording) -
We are beings with free will. Some will exercise that free will to do good things; others will exercise it to do bad things. But since salvation is determined by faith and acceptance of Christ as our savior, our chosen acts (good or bad) are not determinant. That is, nobody is predestined for salvation based on acts or behaviors. Nor are we predestined at birth.
A person becomes predestined for salvation upon accepting Christ and, by extension, accepting the role as a an agent of God. That person, now predestined for salvation, exercises free will. Of course, our savior would prefer for that person's exercise of free will should be to commit acts of good. But whether the acts of this person are good, bad, or mediocre, God uses those acts to bring other souls to Christ. In that way, the predestined soul is an agent of the Trinity. And because he/she has made the conscious decision to accept Christ, that acceptance is what leads to salvation.
Is this the way the Presbyterian Church still teaches it?
I ask for your input because I have been overseas for almost two decades - far from any Presbyterian congregation. I truly have almost no connection to that church anymore.
@@davidprugh4190 where are u now ?
If I am born again, saved by faith alone why can't I now spend all my time in a Catholic Church? I am born again and saved right. So now that I am born again why is it ok for me to do NO works and spend all my time in a downtown Bar but not ok to do Good works and spend all my time in a downtown Catholic Church?
Being Christian means you follow exactly what Jesus teaches, it means you follow christ
@Cerij Andabad The Catholic Church took out hundreds of pages and made up verses that make no sense. At 1 time many years ago, the Catholic Church wasn’t ruled by satanic psychopaths. But that was long ago.
Say it louder for the people in the back!! Praise Jesus!! 🙏
Have a personal relationship with Christ👍🏽🙏🙏
yes but my question is what about the things that didnt start or apply untill after his resurrection?
How are u so sure these teaching you following is actually from jesus?!
@Krisbugajew11-11 I believe you're confused who said "Follow Jesus Teachings Exactly" if you're referring to achieving salvation well it's not to difficult to understand repent and "learn" of his Teachings
The central thing that is always overlooked in explorations of Christianity is that most people are the denomination they are simply based on what church dominated the country that the majority of their ancestors came from. Only people who take the time to ask themselves "hey...does this denomination REALLY teach what I believe ?" are ones who might switch from what was handed down to them. Either that or they may switch because they married someone from a different denomination, and they just agree to do so to keep the peace with their spouse. Roughly and generally speaking, if the majority of your ancestors came from Ireland (except for Northern Ireland), Italy, Poland, France, Belgium, southern Germany or Austria, Slovenia, Croatia, Czechoslovakia or if you are Hispanic, you will almost always be Roman Catholic and never question it. If they came from Greece, the Ukraine, Russia or Serbia, you will be Eastern Orthodox. If they came from northern or central Germany or the Scandinavian countries, you will be Lutheran. If they came from England or Wales, you will be Episcopalian or Methodist, or perhaps Baptist if you live in the southern states in the US, or you are living in the state of Utah, you will most likely be a Mormon. If they came from Africa and you are Black, you will probably be Baptist, Pentecostal or Methodist. If they came from Scotland or the Netherlands or are Scotch-Irish from Northern Ireland, you will be Presbyterian or Reformed. And so on and so forth. And in almost every case, you will never question if the given denomination teaches what you truly believe.
@@Shindler39 Good on you for continuing to search Shindler. I think of it a bit like a pixelated photo. As the pixels get smaller and smaller, the detail becomes clearer and clearer. Maybe over time, you will add more and more pixels to your photo. That's what Catholicism is for me - a much clearer picture that is simply beautiful to behold and reveals the true glory of God.
@@Shindler39 Yes I have been Shindler. When I was getting married however, my fiancé went to a Pentecostal church (she had been raised Catholic and had been drawn away by her sister in law) so I went along a few times with her. To be blunt, all that seemed to happen was that they sang a few pop songs over and over and over for what seemed an eternity, then they were given what I call an "Amway" sales talk that lasted for forty minutes and that was it. I find it telling that all those churches have a "stage" where we have an altar which to me sums it up. Because she had left the faith, it made me research what it was that they were being taught and why - this was before the internet - so I managed to track down a book called Catholicism vs Fundamentalism which really explained the differences beautifully, including all the scriptural references that the Church draws on to arrive at the Catechism.
One of the things that fascinated me was that she had obviously been indoctrinated about all the "evils" of the Catholic church and yet I had never once heard anything "anti Protestant" preached in all my years of attending a Catholic Church, so I was at a complete disadvantage to begin with. All I really knew about Protestantism was that there were a multitude of different denominations and they couldn't agree among themselves, except that they didn't accept the authority of the Pope as head of the Church, they didn't believe in the true presence of Christ in the Eucharist and that some of them didn't believe in the baptism of infants. That was about it really.
On the few occasions I had been in a Protestant church (with the exception of the Anglicans) they were very plain and dull and certainly didn't move me spiritually in the way a Catholic church does.
While many people criticise the Church for its art, most forget that it stretches back into the dark ages as a way of telling the stories from the bible to people who couldn't read. Similarly, the churches were built by the local people who gave what they could to try to glorify and honour God and looked on it as the one piece of true beauty they could enjoy in their hard life. So while people criticise "the Church" for its wealth, it is owned by the very people who participate and has been accumulated over centuries. When, a few years ago we went to Rome and visited St Peters, I can recall thinking to myself "This is mine!" Who are we to disparage and belittle the faith of those who have gone before us?
Beauty is a gift from God, as are our talents. Look at the music that has been written for the Church - it is just one expression of art as sculptures, architecture and painting are all other expressions, equally valid. So by using our talents in this way to honour God to me just makes sense.
Lastly, there are now so many really coherent and respectful Catholic apologists you can watch on CZcams who can explain the faith and refute the disinformation (or in newspeak "Fake News") I would encourage you to really research into the explanations they give to Protestant objections. I believe you will discover a richness and beauty in the faith that is there for the asking, which goes back to my original point about the pixelated photo. Why eat at McDonald's when there is a Michelin starred restaurant right next door...
@@Shindler39 If you want to grow as a Christian WITHIN the Church, have a look at all the programmes they have to offer - retreats, study courses, both online and if you are lucky at a physical location near you. There is a wealth of stuff available but sometimes I think the Church has gotten so well organised with it, it is too "corporate" and feels removed from the day to day experience of an average parishioner. It is yours to discover though.
For me, it really comes down to a matter of Sanctification. We are on a spiritual journey through our lives here on earth trying to become like Christ. Each time we sin, it slows down our progress towards total holiness. That's why I so appreciate the sacraments the Church offers - Holy Eucharist, Confession and absolution, Marriage - and who wouldn't want to have Annointing and Last Rites? This is all part of the richness of the faith that you simply don't get in Protestant churches.
It's a bit the same with the idea of Purgatory, (you know the one - ask your Baptist friends and they will have a heart attack LOL) but I really believe that when we leave this world, as believers, we are drawn to God, but first we are confronted by those things that maybe we never truly repented - pride being foremost among them. This realisation of those transgressions makes us ashamed and gives us the opportunity to truly and fully repent before God. That's what purgatory means to me. The final cleansing before being one of the saints. Therefore the further along we are on our spiritual journey here on earth, the less we have to confront when we finally get to the other side. All the tools in the Church help in this journey and there are so many more of them than what I see in any Protestant Church. It's like trading down from a Mercedes to a Hyundai - they are both cars, but we all know which one we would rather have.
Lastly I would say to you, don't let the sin of pride get in your way - if in your heart you are being drawn back to the faith, then swallow your pride and embrace it. You will get even more out of your journey back into the Church having stepped out - just re-read the story of the Prodigal Son.
I am praying for you...
This is a fine observation. It seems the younger generation today is becoming more inter-denominational. I think if anything, this is the hope for authentic Protestant unity
@@elizabethp4064 The early Church Fathers who you were talking about were all SAINTS in the Catholic Church.
I am a Lutheran. I have learned and studied his whole life and infact 2 years ago was the 500th anniversary of reformation.
@David Ortiz no the term Lutheran came after luther. He did not want us to be called Lutheran. Ps the 2 years ago was the 500th anniversary of reformation was just fun fact not a conclusion
Thanks to Luther he made the church very weak now thanks to him it spit 40 ways since Sunday.
@Jim Johnson I agree it will be like 100,000 by next year hahah
Luther preferred us to be called "Evangelicals". The Catholic church called us "Lutherans" in a derogative manner.
Thanks to him he smashed Christianity to pieces
Your Study. & commentary, is remarkable 👌🏽
Born/raised Protestant and i find it odd that JWs would be considered under this umbrella. I would feel okayish walking into any of the other denominational churches but I would not a JW Kingdom Hall.
JW are not Christian's, they are a cult pure and simple.
Yes, same here.
Yeah, neither JWs nor Christian Scientists are considered Protestant. They do not descend from the Reformation. If it were up to me, no Restorationist or Non-Denominational churches would use our Protestant label, either.
This is such a complicated topic, but you did a great job. Much appreciated!
That was very enlightening thank you. You didn't talk down about any group. Very refreshing.
This was an exceptionally sensitive and ecumenical video. Well done.
I took catholic classes because I thought, if I should begin searching for a church, why not go with the most oldest and ancient?? I learned an incredible amount of wisdom and knowledge from these classes about church history. My exposure to The Father's has given me insight into the legacy and witness all of us receive that has been passed down even to this day.... I just was not sold on the teachings of Mary, the pope, indulgences, and sacramentalism.... I may not agree, but who am I to say God isn't working through those churches???
Celtic church long predates papacy
Who ain’t catholic by heart my friend 🙏
Do Orthodox Christianity
What u tryna say
@@stjepanpalinic3683 It's a religion. Orthodox Christianity, similar to Catholicism but in some ways we both are different(I'm a Catholic.) Whenever you hear the term Eastern Orthodox, it's these Orthodox Christians.
@@lordjesuschristhavemercyon3251 what deferences ?
@@stjepanpalinic3683 Views on the Trinity, the role of Pope and his authority.
Lord Jesus Christ have mercy on our souls. There too similar
The most comprehensive video I have ever seen on the topic
This was a great video.
Thank you to Cory and Jayan for proofreading for me!
Very interesting! Thanks for giving us the chance to understand this better 💕
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
I can understand this from catechism of the reform church....our many churches CHRIST ➕ one church....as well as this verse "there are many ways of serving GOD ➕ as long as the same GOD ➕ is served...meaning FATHER,SON AND HOLY SPIRIT...so watchtower(Jehovah witnesses) definitely not part of christian protestant denomination
Thankyou I went to an unitarian church today- I was brought up roman catholic, my Irish mother is now Baptist, my dad Methodist, my nan was Pentecostal, my uncle Quaker. I am looking to find my way back to god, in whatever way that means to me now.
In other words, all came from the Catholic Church at some point...
To me, a Church preceding all other "splits" have to be the one created by Christ originally.
Scripture doesn't mention the need for future splits from the existing Church; on the other hand, plenty of warnings against false teachers. _(All protestant denominations have a man responsible for their creations, and most take place in modern days)_ Paul also states that there should _not_ be any schism among the faithful, so based on that, the actions of Luther and other reformers are highly questionnable; God never abandoned his people in times of error; he kept the same order of things but replaced leaders in their office. (Moses, David, Salomon, etc).
I find your statement that Luther, etc...are highly questionnable...because I have come to that same concllution after years of looking at their actions....thanx for stating a similiar position...
are u from the Church of Christ?
verum, are u from the Church of Christ?
@@lisao5021
Catholic Church
@Asaph Vapor
Get your facts straight, Asaph.
Acts 11: 26 mentions that THOSE in the Church were _called_ Christians (in Antioch). It was in no way the "name" of the Church.
*Funny thing though:*
The BISHOP of Antioch was Ignatius of Antioch, around 100 AD. He was taught the faith by John the apostle himself... and HE said the following:
_"See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is administered either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude of the people also be; even as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. -Letter to the Smyrnaeans, Ch 8, 110~ AD"_
...The Catholic Church, Asaph, and look at the year it was used. And it also shows an AUTHORITY of the Church, which you deny. (back then THE Bishop was a reference to the Pope)
The word means "Universal" in greek, and was already used as a qualifier of the one true Church in the first century whether you agree with it or not. We used this name to identify ourselves, and stand out from those who would "claim" to be the "true church". _(against the docetists, Marcionists, early gnostics, etc)_
If you could talk with Ignatius, Asaph, what do you think he would say to you? Would you debate and deny his insights as well? _(Remember, no biblical canon back then; sola scriptura was not even possible)_
I know im late to comment but thank you for making this. Its very informative
No denominational churches generally de-enphasise contentious issues that other denominations emphasise. They generally don't split hairs as long as you believe in an unearned grace-given salvation through belief in Jesus. Some do lean a bit pentacostal, with some speaking in tongues and emphasis on healing
I grew up going to Pentecostal churches but thankfully never saw anyone handling snakes. I’m also glad that you mentioned that Pentecostal churches vary a lot so not all Pentecostals speak in tongues etc.
I am Pentecostal as well but belong to Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee). The snake handling churches branched off from us in the early 20th century (as well as several other Pentecostal churches). A previous location of my church was about half a mile from a snake handling church but never was tempted to go into one. There are enough snakes in the (collective) church as it is.
A Pentacostal not speaking in tongues is like a salesman who doesn't sell
@@b213videoz fr
Harap perbaiki terj Church of God. Bukan "milik Gereja Tuhan" tapi "Gereja milik Tuhan"
@@b213videoz why?
JW's believe Jesus was executed on an upright "stake" without a cross beam. This is a major factor regarding them not having any crosses as a part of their faith. I was surprised that this video didn't mention that. I thought I would share.
This video is about Protestants.
JW are not papists but are def not considered Protestants
The father is greater than all
Jesus Christ was the father in the flesh, but he said the spirit was greater than the flesh, talkin about his humanity.
I'm pentecostal, and I've never heard of the snake thing...that's just straight up weird...but I don't think that part represents us all.
Yes some pentecoastal churches practice snake handling and drinking poison but most of those churches are located in Tennessee or Appalachian
but did u hear that the pentecostal „churches„ support the lgbtq „rights„ and homosexual marriages?
Part of your history loll
Im apostolic pentecostal oneness we dont mess with snakes just those that have 2 legs arms and serpent head we cast out demons and preach the gospel we dont drink pioson or handle venomouse snakes thou shalt not tempt the lord thy God suicide is of the devil if you dont obey acts 2:38.you wont go to heaven you will go to hell you must be born again of water and the spirit we believe the whole bible 10 comms, prayer , foot washing, pray for the sick , witnessing worship Jesus our God we dont fallow the trinity
Apostolics are for man and a women marriage we dont support LGTBQ WE DONT BEAR ARMS WE BELIEVE IN HOLINESS.
Good job. Tough topic to tackle but you did a great job in a few mins... BRAVO
Thanks for this video. I learned many things I never knew before.
In all my years as a Seventh-day Adventist I have never heard of birthday celebrations being controversial. The majority of us keep Christmas and Easter. There are some dissenters and they are entitled to their opinions. I like the way you described Adventists.
SDA, LDS, JWs , Christian Science are a
anti-Christ CULTS created by Satan in the 1800s
Question: Is it true that your faith teaches that Jesus was crucified on a stake (or tree) like the Watchtower Society does or is that only their doctrine or belief??
@@tarlankasra ~ No we don't. We believe the cross was a traditional cross. As far as I know that is only their doctrine. Thanks for asking. Anything else?
All that matters at the end of the day is that you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour and follow his teachings.
Awesome vudeo btw
I reckon you could look at what any non-deniminational church states their beleifs to be ( assuming they don't change from week to week) and find that they are already some version of an existing denomination.
The apostles doctrine is the only doctrine. Acts 2:38-42
There's no such thing as a non-denominational church.
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
Some churches that were of a denomination have dropped the affiliation and become non-denominational, often because of costs associated with the denomination.
@@joycegreer9391 I troll everywhere because nobody watches my crap
The pentecostals can also be divided into two groups: Trinitarians and Oneness Pentecostals (also aka Apostolics). Where the main difference is the use of the name Jesus Christ at the moment of baptism vs. the use of the father son and the holy ghost during this rite.
Amen! I love apostolics! In Jesus name!
I grew up in Apostolic movement in knew everybody else was either Catholic Baptist, episcopal, missionary Baptist. Mormon, JW and Calvary chapel, assembly of god monies, Buddhist, Muslims, native American church peyotes eaters atheists non believers communists in Mexico there all mostly RCC and santeria,
The Oneness Apostolic Pentecostal UPCI don't do handling snakes or drink poison, that's false interpretation of the word of God the snake cult is another type of people that lived in Appalachia they may be Jesus only or Trinity true Oneness don't fellowship with these cults
Denominations in Christiany is a sad reality. If Christians claims to worship one true God, Why are they so divided and not only worship as one Church.
One thing that divides denominations is how a pastor comes to serve a congregation.
Catholics, Anglicans, and Methodists believe that a bishop should appoint a pastor to serve a congregation. Othe Protestant denominations believe that a congregation should call a minister to the pulpit.
There are pros and cons to both ways to pick a pastor.
Its easy! Jesus started the Catholic church in 33ad. In 1517, Luther and protestants have been splintering ever since. Jesus only started one church... Catholic. #TruthBombs
Satan LOVES religion....he wants humanity worshipping.....he just wants them worshipping the WRONG God/s
So I tripped over your Mormon video, and couldn't decide whether you were speaking for or against Mormonism. I decided to check out the video regarding my own religion (this one) to see.
You are right down the middle. Neither pro or con, just stating facts. I am HIGHLY impressed. You've earned a subscriber.
Matthew 16:18-19
"And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in Heaven.”
I just can't wrap my head around the fact that any person, of any denomination, that claims to follow Christ, would ever support homosexuality.
because it's really really cool
I can’t wrap my head around someone that claims to follow Christ that can’t see past someone’s sexuality and judges because of it
@@dumbdog611 yea I can't either. Good thing I have zero problem with any homosexuals at all and good thing I never judged anybody about it at all. Don't really understand what you were trying to get at with the response but if the Bible says homosexuality is wrong why would "followers of Christ" support homosexuality
I don't think it's always a case of supporting it but more a case of just accepting another person's choice. I'm of the opinion that we'll each get judged according to our own life and how we lived it. I don't think God is going to judge YOU based on how Johnny down the road lived his life.
I also think having horrible thoughts or opinions about others is not very nice either, it's negative and invites evil.
@@eslChelsea well those are 2 different things. We're not talking about "accepting" homosexuals, we're talking about supporting homosexuality.
The Catholic Church has always taught that you can not buy spiritual things although certain clergy at the time of the reformation may have pushed the idea, official Church teaching has always and always will be to the contrary. God gave us one Bread( the Eucharist) and made us one body( The Roman Catholic Church). He doesn’t desire us to not know what the scriptures and traditions teach so he gave the Magesterium to be his voice concerning faith, morals,doctrines, and dogmas (Mathew 18:18).
@kim burley if the church Jesus Christ started was not the Catholic Church show me the church he started historically from the beginning from one century to the next. Remember any Protestant Church started after the year 1520.
As far as murder and pedophilia it is much more prevalent in Protestant churches than in the Catholic Church and that you can find that with a simple Google search. Uneducated people like you say such things. Murder and pedophilia is wrong no matter where it's at including the church Jesus Christ started
@kim burley you keep saying pedophile priests insinuating all priests are pedophiles. This shows your nonsense. There is more pedophilia hands-down in Protestant churches. This is fact and can be found by a simple Google search.
I asked you to show me the church Jesus Christ started. It isn't an invisible Church. It was very visible starting with the apostles being the first Bishops. The Bible clearly states various churches in various cities. You are the one who is talking nonsense. This church started by Jesus Christ will be protected by him till the end of time. The only church started right from the beginning and can be seen in history is the Catholic Church. All Protestant churches of which you are part of started after the year 1520 because of Martin Luther's heresy. That bothers a Protestant like yourself quite a bit and this is why you say the nonsense you do
@Asaph Vapor the problem is Martin Luther's idea of justification did not come from the Bible but himself. You will not find Bible alone or faith alone for salvation in the Bible. As a matter of fact until the Catholic Church put the Bible together in about the year 400 ad Christian teaching was done by the church through sacred tradition. Jesus Christ never says everything you need to know will be written down in a book nor does his apostles. Faith alone is not in the Bible or was ever said by any of his apostles it always was faith and works together for salvation. Protestants like yourself are taught that Catholic Doctrine is not biblical when in fact everything the church teaches is in the Bible.
Martin Luther did no Christian any good by his heresy. He separated Christianity through his Satan inspired idea of justification and you say that is good
You are implying that Jesus Christ started a church and then forgot about it till Martin Luther came along 1520 years later. Baloney, he said he would protect it till the end of time and the Catholic church has stood this promise no matter what people like you say. Every Protestant church was founded after the year 1520 and the church you belong to today was founded by a man not Jesus Christ or the apostles.
By the way, what Protestant Church do you belong to and why do you think it is the church started by Jesus Christ?
@Asaph Vapor one doctrine of faith that is in the Bible is the authority of the church. The Bible is all truth but is not the only truth it was never meant to be that. You are taught as a Protestant that scripture alone for everything you need to know and you disregard the authority of the church. Martin Luther did the same thing.
New doctrines weren't invented. That is Protestant nonsense again something you were taught.
I noticed you didn't tell me your Protestant denomination and why you think it's the church founded by Jesus Christ. Instead you say the Catholic Church is not the church founded by Jesus Christ when history shows it was
@Asaph Vapor all authority comes from God. Jesus Christ as God on Earth established his church and it's a visible Church. The apostles were the first Bishops and they anointed their successors who were the Bishops and Priests of the church. The church had structure and this is evident in the scriptures. The apostles defined Doctrine early on and there is an unending chain that can be seen in the Catholic Church which is the universal church. You still did not give me your Protestant denomination apparently you are ashamed of it
Including Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, and Scientology in Christianity would be like including Buddhism in Hinduism or Islam in Judaism; it demonstrates a categorical flaw in how you approached the study. Aside from that, the video was a really good introduction and I appreciate the work you did to compile and summarize the broad branches of Christianity.
Hi David! I included them because they identify as Christians, even though others may disagree. And I didn't include Scientology, but rather Christian Scientists. Two very different things!
As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints who has been immersed in the religion her whole life, I can say that the religion you called the slang term "Mormon" is very much a Christ-worshipping faith. The term "Christian" defines a follower of Christ, yeah? Well, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints very much encourages following Christ's teachings. Thus it is very much a Christian faith, although it may be a little different from the others doctrinally.
If you don't believe me, why don't you look into the religion itself through the scriptures it teaches from?
They encourage reading from the Bible. That much you can relate to.
The Book of Mormon is about the ancient Americans, and is very much centered around Christ. The things it teaches are very much in harmony with what the Bible teaches.
Actually his video if FULL of flaws.
@@EmilyS-gk3st Not even close. LDS preaches a different Jesus, not the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Following the teachings of Christ is not the belief that makes one a true Christian.
@@joycegreer9391 False. I have read both the Bible and The Book of Mormon. Both preach the same Jesus. I'm guessing you've never read The Book of Mormon?
Excellent quick synoptic of the major denominations.
If it is not clear from this video essay that Sunday is the most segregated day of the week, please pay closer attention.
I'm proud to be orthodox!!
I love the Orthodox Church.
You are one of the originals con grats the rest are just wanna bees
I am from Catholic Church.
We loves you so much.
Altough in my country (Indonesia) doesn't have a lot of Orthodox Representation.
I see most Orthodox teaching is agreeable in Catholics lens
@JESUS IS COMING SOON Orthodoxs has many common tradition with the catholics. So it's clearly wrong. Maybe in the past there were real Bible believing orthodox churches. But these days they just pray to icons, Mary and dead saints. This is unbiblical...
@@dimitartodorov4826 you obviously don't understand the earliest history, the first Icon was of The Holy Mother of GOD painted by the Apostle Luke, we don't worship Saints we venerate them , the Saints are our brothers and sisters in CHRIST, thy are family, yes we ask them to pray for us, do you ask people to pray for you ? do you not have pictures of family that you look at with love ? Do you know the first New Testament wasn't compiled until just after the year 400 by the church? Was the Church JESUS'S Apostles built wrong until Martin Luther came along ? People think they can understand the Bible with their own rational logic , while not understanding the mysteries of GOD , this is why branches have broken off and splintered into 10's of thousands of groups, I hope you search & find truth GOD BLESS 🙏
Seventh day adventists and JWs are not Protestant or Christian denominations. They are separate cults. Christians believe in salvation by grace through faith alone. Seventh Day Adventists have works based salvation and Jws have a completely rewritten Bible and belief system all together.
Would love to see Salvation Army in there.
Do they all continue steadfastly in the apostles doctrine?
Already occurred 2 centuries ago, salvation army became most powerful army in world ever seen when Roma became Christian.
@Casey McCullen The Templar Knight of Justice it is a charity but first and foremost, a church.
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
Thank you this was soooo well created!
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
This is an amazing video. Thank you
Jesus said to him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father (God) except through Me (Jesus). - John 14:6
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. - John 3:16
That if you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. - Romans 10:9
Then Peter said to them, "Repent (turn away from sins), and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. - Acts 2:38
But you are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, His own special people, that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His marvelous light; - 1 Peter 2:9
For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39
Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord, shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. Many will say to Me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?' And then I wll declare to them, 'l never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!" - Matthew 7:21-23
And He said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect în weakness." Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. - 2 Corinthians 12:9
If you want to accept Jesus as Your Lord and Savior, say this prayer: Dear Lord Jesus, I know that I am a sinner, and I ask for Your forgiveness. I believe You, Jesus, died for my sins, are Lord, and God rose You from the dead. I turn from my sins and invite You to come into my heart and life. Jesus, I want to trust, accept, and follow You as my Lord and Savior. In Jesus's name, amen.
What you say is true, Faith Joseph. The only problem is that all Christian churches and denominations agree on everything on your list.
What denomination do you belong to? Why is saying this specific prayer required?
@الدين القيّم Mohammed will lead you to hell. Islam commands to kill unbelievers, christians and jews. Mohammed lived 600 years after Jesus's resurrection but he claims that Jesus didn't raise from the dead. Not today false prophet Mohammed!
@@wfalgo1 It doesn't need to be that specific prayer. Just sincerely believing the Gospel and trusting in Jesus as your Savior and Lord. You can do your own prayer.
Dude. Where are you getting your info? Catholics don’t and never did teach that indulgences were a way to “buy” your way into heaven. Nor that you can buy your salvation from works.
Luther didn’t teach salvation by faith. He taught salvation from FAITH ALONE.
The Catholic Church also never said that the Bible could only be read in Latin. In fact, Luther wasn’t even the first guy to translate the Bible into the vernacular (German). There already were MANY translations done by the Catholic Church in German. What the Church did say is that the scriptures must be proclaimed SPECIFICALLY IN THE LITURGY in Latin.
Get your facts straight dude.
Hi there! That text was all provided by a Lutheran seminary student who volunteered their time, so I apologize if it's a little off. Maybe in an effort to break it down into laymen's terms it lost some of its clarity.
Indulgences definitely were a thing. The Church needed money and they took advantage of people by selling them. The idea was to reduce the punishment for your sins so you would spend less time in Purgatory when you died. The very sale of these indulgences went against God's words and against the teachings of the Church for years before that point. Luther had a very legitimate complaint about it.
@@jacobmuhlenkamp4257 Amen
Beautifully presented!
The reformation was sorely needed.
Absolutely!!
I grew up Southern Baptiat in NY. It was a small church. IDK what the Southetn part stands for. One set of my grand parents were of the " Bretheren". It was very different going to their church and I have no idea what it was about but children were kept in a seperate room. There were silent prayers and a lay preacher but different speakers at rge same time.
The difference between the Baptist and Southern Baptist churches was their stance on slavery and segregation. Want to take a guess which one was which?
Gained a subscriber. All of your videos are amazing.
This was really helpful, thank you.
You forgot to mention at least an approximation of the number of Protestant churches.
I'd say Pentecostal is more common to see Speaking in tongues, liberation of spirits and demons, and healing
@David Ortiz uhh no. God can heal, he can bring freedom from unclean spirits and the Holy Spirit gives the gift of speaking im tongues. Its not all God can do, he ccan do much more miracles, who are we to limit what wonders he can or cannot do
The Presbyterian and Calvinist Church of Scotland took the concept of Protesting to its logical conclusion and have had many, many schisms over the years. While some have re-united or merged with different branches over the years, have currently have The Church of Scotland (the National, but NOT established church), The Free Church, The Free Church (Continuing), The United Free Church, The Free Presbyterian Church, The Associated Presbyterian Churches, and The Reformed Presbyterian Churches.
That's before you include the Scottish Episcopal Church - the only church in the Anglican Communion that is not a daughter church of the Church of England, but instead stems from parallel movements within the Scottish church when James VI ascended the English throne as James I.
We also have two slightly distinct groups of Roman Catholics. Lowland Catholics, mostly descended from 19th Century Irish Immigrants to the big cities (though added to by Italians, Poles, Lithuanians, and Others over the decades) and Highland Catholics who are the last vestiges of Pre-Reformation Scotland. Because of the highly-Centralised nature of the Catholic church, the distinction is more cultural among the people (though most share the same Football team)
We've quite a lot going on, especially considering only around 52% of our ~5M population identifies as Christian (going by 2011 census)
Let me guess before I even read the comments. "This Christian sect is not Christian." Now, I'll read the comments.
Yep. I must be a prophet.
Central Scrutinizer you must have read the comments before you commented because your comment isn’t edited 👎🏾
Really the only one is Johava witness because they deny our lord and savior. The majority of sects disagree on minors and agree on the majors. A few oddball that claim only thier sect saves but honestly those are cults and should be avoided. If you're interested I would suggest checking out a nondom go to a Bible study and see what Christian are really about. We are heavily misrepresented in media and the world. We just people that love God and love our neighbors.
If you are willing to take the time, I would reccomend buying a MacArthur study bible and reading it for yourself, seeing how it all connects. The Bible, being the core of Christian faith, would give the most straightforward account of Christianity.
Sorry if that was a bit long. Praying for you! :)
@@jamesmurphy7281 Absolutely. Best thing to do.
To any Jehovah’s witness I ask how does Daniel 10:13 effect the way you see Jesus? The verse says:
“But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.”
So is Jesus just one of the chief princes? I encourage you to read this verse, in context, and understand who and what Jesus really is.
Colossians 1:16-17
"For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.”
This verse shows that even Michael was created by Jesus. I pray that your eyes will be opened to who He is.
But the Father is greater than Jesus, meaning Worship should only be to the Lord of Lords which is God. By this, it only makes sense than Jesus is not God as God is the most high.
@@esaw7067 Thomas literally called Jesus God. Jesus said him and the father are one
@@xintimidate and Jesus said my father is greater than I. Meaning they are separate and the Father (God) is the Lord while Jesus is his servant.
@@xintimidate how can someone who admits he is lower be considered God?
@@esaw7067 Again. Thomas literally called him God. Read John 1
Thank you for not representing nontrinitarian viewpoints unfairly. Interestingly, the Church of Christ, Scientist is also nontrinitarian. I personally am a nontrinitarian Christian who is a member of the Disciples of Christ, a denomination that takes no stance on the trinity either way. Since every translation of the Bible has some verses that are clearly nontrinitarian and some verses that are clearly trinitarian, I believe that we should all be able to be considered true-believing Christians.
Why is it that only one pope visit Israel to pray at the tomb of Christ. It sounds like Christian antisemitism to me.
To be fair to Catholics, the Pope does not decide Catholic doctrine and he cannot change cannon law even if he does make an "ex cathedra" statement. (Only happened 5 times ever) Also, inferring Catholics place human authority as higher than the Bible is a mis-representation of their theology. I'm Protestant, but we need to stop mis-representing Catholics or putting words in their mouth based on our perceptions of them or "what a Catholic I know told me".
Also, Lutheran's do not believe communion is literally the body and blood of Christ (transubstantiation). Luther taught consubstantiation, that Christ was spiritually present "in, under, and through" what continued to be bread and wine. So that was inaccurate as well.
Very good! The word is protestantism and NOT christanism, as the latter covers even the oriental churches (russians, armenians, etc.)
I find it interesting that you state in the beginning that there are too many branches of Christianity, yet you throw in two non Christian faiths (Jehovah’s witnesses and Scientology). Why even have them in the video?
Hi Brian. I don’t include Scientology, I include Christian Scientists. And I’m including those faiths because THEY classify themselves as Christians. Protestants will always debate which denominations are valid and which aren’t, so I went off whether they consider themselves Protestant.
I Am Your Target Demographic ah ok. Overall I thought it was a good overview. Just hate it when groups that don’t believe Jesus is the Saviour are lumped in with Christians.
David Ortiz Mormons are not Christians. Adventist’s are as far as I understand what they believe. Mormonism does not follow Jesus Christ, they follow the teachings of their “prophets” which are in direct conflict with what Jesus taught.
many branches of Christianity all these denomination has made it very weak every one thinks different that says to me its all fake
@@joannechisholm4501 I've noticed you on a lot of comments if you find Christianity to be false why do you spend so much time communicating with them? If you have questions on how to become saved I would love to answer them and help lead you to Christ. You like me are a sinner and only he can save you.
saturday
me too-a sabbatarian.i also admire j.w.s refusal to celebrate not only holidays, but birthdays. dont agree with their restriction on blood transfusion. always wondered what christian science believed.
While indeed “superficial,” the author entirely gets it WRONG regarding Luther and “indulgences.” In his thesis regarding the central or core issue, he called indulgences “trifles.”
* Desiderius Erasmus was the Dutch humanist scholar hired by the Vatican in hopes of assassinating (intellectually) Reformer Martin Luther. Erasmus wrote his Diatribe to destroy the Protestants. Luther responded with his magnum opus Bondage of the Will which stands as the lighthouse of the Reformation.
"Now, my good Erasmus, I entreat you for Christ's sake to keep your promise at last. You promised that you would yield to him who taught better than yourself. Lay aside respect of persons! I acknowledge that you are a great man, adorned with many of God's noblest gifts--wit, learning and an almost miraculous eloquence, to say nothing of the rest; whereas I have and am nothing, save that I would glory in being a Christian. Moreover, I give you hearty praise and commendation on this further account--that you alone, in contrast with all others, have attacked the real thing, that is, the essential issue. You have not wearied me with those extraneous issues about the Papacy, purgatory, indulgences and such like--trifles, rather than issues--in respect of which almost all to date have sought my blood (though without success); you, and you alone, have seen the hinge on which all turns, and aimed for the vital spot." M.Luther
I am Roman Catholic but its so interesting to see different denominations
Agreed! I am Roman Catholic too.
@David Ortiz Cool dude
@David Ortiz You ever feel like you put more faith in your religion then in your savior?
@@joemerlin152 Here we go.
I was roman catholic untill i read the bible
We are Saved by *GRACE* alone through *FAITH* alone in *CHRIST* alone
Saved by Grace through Faith AND Works. _(the works aren't the main reason for salvation, although they are Biblically _*_necessary_*_ for salvation.)_
What was the works of the thief that died with Jesus ?
Informative.Protestant reformation changed the course of history.It heralded a new era
Another great video!
why so many different points of view for one central belief? 🤷🏼♂️...
Different Apostles of Christ made different teachings I guess.
It’s more cultural than doctrinal
Basically they differ in how the church should be governed. But when it comes to salvation we all believe Christ is the key and that His grace is sufficient.
We all believe the same main thing that Jesus was the son of God and is our Lord and saviour
@David Ortiz that's why I'm not a protestant
If the Bible INTERPRETS itself then there wouldn't be 40,000 Protestants SECTS and CULTS.
@Asaph Vapor The Protestant Reformation only OCCURED around 1517 or the 15th century. So NO Protestant Church can claim to be the TRUE Church of Jesus Christ since the Reformation only occured around the 1517, while our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and His apostles lived around 1st century AD. Heck Martin Luther and all the Reformers wasn't even alive in the 1st century AD, so how can you claim anti Catholic Prottie that Protestantism with all of 30 to 40,000 SECTS and CULTS is the truth?
The reason we have 40.000 churches and denominations because of rebbelion stiff neck , pride , love of the world , lust of the flesh lust of the eyes harden hearts my way or the highway we cant let go of our sin we love to.party idols the bigest idol is him who looks in the mirror who me and tradition my mother was catholic i wont change ill die a catholic stubborness which is witchcraft
Very well explained & elustrated. Thanks.
a great video for someone who gets their understanding of things from Wikipedia.
Please do Swedenborgianism.
Keep up the very well done work !
Hmm...this is really an insightful video.
I’m a bit disturbed though, especially with what Martin Luther said about how faith alone os one of the keys of being saved. To all Protestants, I want to ask directly does this mean that a sinner who believes in Christ will be saved rather than someone who has done many good deeds, even if the former has not been dedicated to God with his heart????
Yes. That is what it means, I personally do not agree with this. Some churches believe this but others don’t. I believe that yes faith has a big part but also you need to be kind and follow the example of Jesus. It doesn’t make sense to say that you accept god but then go around sinning
John 14:6 (KJV)
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
The bible says faith without works is dead faith
If a sinner believes in Christ and accepts His salvation he will be saved an a new creation. He needs to turn from his sinful lifestyle and follow Jesus.
@@EliteGaming110 indeed. You show your faith by your works. Faith without works is truly dead. However, we are not saved by our works, for we cannot save ourselves. We are saved by grace alone.
Accurate video but the Jehovas witnesses do not subscribe to the doctrine of the Trinity. You cannot be a Christian and not worship Jesus as your LORD and savior
@lary Snw Oh yes it is.
Excellent, excellent video. Like others have said I think you did a great job at representing each denomination well and without any bias. Quick question, where does the Mormon Church fit in all of this?
Non-Christian sect or cult.
@@joycegreer9391 poor Joyce the troll can’t even get one person to comment on her teachings is here to cry. Learn what comments are nobody watches your crap
without the Catholic Church you will never know Christianity
@Asaph Vapor Mother Mary is and will be the queen of heaven ! And Jesus is the King ! You ppl cannot demean Mother Mary ! You ppl should give her respect !
@Asaph Vapor Psalm 45:9 - the psalmist teaches that the Queen stands at the right hand of God. The role of the Queen is important in God’s kingdom. Mary the Queen of heaven is at the right hand of the Son of God.
@@justadude7598 Read Jeremiah 7:18
True!
It's so funny that Protestantism started in large part because a Catholic Priest didnt understand the tenets of his own religion, so he started a new one. And then many people didn't like/understand his tenets, so they made a new one. Kinda telling when you think about it.
Wrong during the Middle Ages the Roman Catholic Church held a virtual monopoly of faith in Western Europe. However, between the 14th and 17th centuries a series of Northern European reforms led to what is now called the “Protestant Reformation” culminating in a mass exodus from the near total control of Christianity from Rome. The Reformation began in 1517 when Martin Luther, an monk, nailed 95 propositions to a church door in Wittenberg, Germany. These proposals for reform challenged many contemporary church practices. Committed to the idea that salvation only could be reached through faith and “divine grace”, Luther compiled the list of grievances known as the “Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences” -- The 95 Theses.
It started as a movement against what its followers perceived to be errors in the Catholic Church. Protestants originating in the Reformation reject the Roman Catholic doctrine of papal supremacy, but often disagree amongst themselves.
Martin Luther intent was to spark a debate within his church over a reformation of Catholicism. Instead, Luther and those who followed him found themselves at the forefront of a new religious movement.
The Catholic who founded the Bible not the Protestant
@@censoredquotes3518 But what Martin Luther did is SPLINTER 📴 Christianity.
@@tatumarabaca8231 No, RCC did not found the Bible...lol.
@@Darth_Vader258 No, that is what the RCC did. Luther wanted reforms, not to leave the RCC. The Vatican refused any reforming. Others had tried before Luther and were burned at the stake by the RCC. Does killing those who disagree with you sound like any church that would be of Jesus??
2:04 Protestant does not mean protests the church. It refers to the protestation at speyer, and the protest was against a proscription of the evangelical faith in the HRE.
I AM GODIST.
GOD IS LOVE.
SO SIMPLE.
GOD GUIDES I HIMSELF HIM ME.
What A HEAVENLY GREAT break down.
No JUDGMENT.
Just HISTORY.
WHO CONTROLS THE PAST CONTROLS THE FUTURE.
Good job in such a short time! You could mention the Southern Baptist Convention as a unified body for some Baptists.
czcams.com/video/G5Goz6hfUWA/video.html
Independent Baptists predate the RCC and therefore all Protestants by MANY centuries...their local churches are autonomous as taught and they believe in the plenary inspiration of the Holy Bible....they separated themselves out from the SBC because the church as Christ established it has no set organization except the Pastor and the Body who all answer to Jesus the Son
The Catholic Church did not forbid the use of vernacular translations of the Bible. The Latin Vulgate was the official translation of the Bible but other AUTHORIZED versions were allowed. Of course scarcely anyone could read before the 19th century. Those that could read, COULD READ LATIN.
ilmaestro, sorry, but you are entirely incorrect. The Catholic church forbade translating, or even reading, the Bible in any other language than Latin, and this, at the pain of death. This is why both Wycliffe & Tyndale were persecuted and burnt (Wycliffe posthumously). It was only when they couldn't beat the demand for a vulgar tongue bible, that they produced the Duoauy Rheims around 1570+-, and even this was translated from Jerome's Latin Vulgate. But prior, any other Bible than the Vulgate was completely outlawed for a century.
@David Ortiz Even so O wise responder!
I invite you to watch the series "A Lamp in the dark" by Chris Pinto. There are 3 videos available on CZcams and a 4th is coming up next year. Warning! each video is >2h because de necessary evidence to be presented. In addition, videos 2&3 have extra CDs of information but if you want them, you have to buy them from adullam.com
Guttenburg Bible was printed in 1453.......although translations were rare the RCC opposed the printing of the Bible into common tongue so the masses could read it for their own.....King John commissioned the most famous of translations in 1609 from which we get the modern Bible by that name.....the "modern translation Bibles" use a manuscript translated from some of the original scrolls by two Atheists......the KJV translators struggled and prayed with multiple groups to get their wording and meaning right to the spirit of the Bible......anyone using a modern "Bible" is using a counterfeit document MEANT to lead them astray
@@michaelkendall662 There is an error in nearly every sentence of this reply. For a start the English King John ruled during the beginning of the 13th Century. He signed the Magna Carta in 1215. If you respond to this I will go on pointing out your absurdities one by one.
Wonderful video. The last point of TULIP is perseverance of the saints.
I'm just going type this down.
Idolatry, literally, is to not worship other deities. That's it.
That means, yes, you can wear a cross or shawl. A cross, shawl or even the star of David, are in fact not idols; their literally by definition symbols not Idols. That's basically saying you can't learn Hebrew because Hebrew letters are actually symbols not letters. Which 96 percent of the entire old Testament, ove 70 percent of the holy bible, is written under. I truly hope people are actually reading this expression very carefully.
Not entirely. Idolatry is putting anything before God. Making anything more important to you than God.
Fascinating and interesting video for a non religious person like me to make sense of so many denominations. Really well made. But also fascinating to think some of these beliefs are still taken seriously in the 21st century despite the unparalleled progress made in modern science in explaining the world around us, its really quite bizarre when you think about it seriously.
It's bizarre you would think that. Modern science is nothing compared to God.
The hate against JWs. I'm not one and have meet less than 5 but show some respect. If they want to call themselves Christians let them. I'm Mormon myself and refer to myself as a Christian. I believe in Jesus Christ.
They are not Christian and neither are you, but we are both followers of Jesus Christ so I respect you for that and I respect your opinions, however being a Mormon and being Christian are two very different things and I see you do not know much about either if anything at all.
As a reformed Catholic (meaning I no longer have a practicing affiliation with Catholicism) I have much respect and admiration for Luther, but it in the end the spirituality that makes the most sense and has the most meaning for me is Deism/Pan deism.
I grew up Catholic and rejected it when I reached the age of reason but remained essentially Christian. When I was 19 I joined the Unification Church, you know the Moonies. I stayed with them for 3 years. I rejected them as a cult but still thought of myself basically a Christian
Continued- about 19 years ago it came to me as an epiphany - I had realized that all religion was man made and was more or less a method of control , that God created us with the ability to reason. Most religion is based on blind faith and hearsay. I believe in a creator and that if what you do is destructive is a “ sin”. And what is constructive is a “grace”.
Jehovas Witness is not Christianity and therefore not a protestant denomination. Its an own religion. You should not have had it in this video.
@lary Snw they do not believe that Jesus is God
I'm from the Philippines and very proud of my Carholic heritage. Roman Catholicism is the greatest legacy of Spain to the Filipino people. Gracias Spaña.
Catholic church rocks!! My wife in from Philippines!!!
This confusion confirms my believe that the Catholic Church is the one true apostolic Church of God.
How so?
DashikiMe Clothing
How can they be apostolic if they teach that *anyone* who believes we are saved by faith alone, a gift from God, through grace and not of our own works IS ANATHEMA?
If someone adheres to what Paul wrote to the Ephesians (in chapter 2, verses 8-9), they are deemed accursed by the Catholic Church. Therefore, the Catholic Church cannot be apostolic.
@Asaph Vapor Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura is from Satan himself, and Martin Luther is in Hell. Protestantism is Satanism 40,000 CRAZY FANATICAL Protestants denominations all believing in Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura.
Amen.
You are the church of God not that building.
Just now seeing this years later, but @20:42-44 there's a correction to Jehovah's Witness belief. According to their belief, God never had a literal son. God created Michael the Archangel in the beginning, who He sent to earth in and became a physical form. While Michael had a physical body on the earth they called him Jesus and after his death he returned to being Michael. According to the Jehovah's Witness, Jesus was was not the literal Son of God, nor was Jesus God at any point as God never gave birth to anything. It is their belief that there is no trinity of God. One God in 3 forms, Father, Son, the Holy Spirit (or Soul, Body, Spirit). This is paramount in Christianity and any protestant denomination.
Many of these protestant churches work on people's emotions.
Bible already prophesied, "For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry".
2Timothy 4:3-5
"if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God,the pillar and foundation of the truth"
1 Timothy. 3:15.
6:12 you mention that the Anglican church observes Appostatic succession, this also applies to the lutheran Church of Sweden.
Actually, neither of them do.
Only the Orthodox and Catholic have true Apostolic succession
Actually the majority of Lutherans practice Apostolic Succession [not just the Church of Sweden] even in America [ELCA] but Lutherans view AS as a good and historic practice rather than the only way to govern the Church
@@George040270true
@@dylanfernandez3910true
15:42 ummm that's just straight up demonic
As a Christian that looked weird
What do you expect from denominations relying on Sola Scriptura and personal interpretations? Since all "claim" to be inspired, they can pretty much do anything while claiming to be inspired, and without a form of authority to stop them, they will keep doing it, and drag more people in their heresy.
I don't mean to insult anyone but these same mortal human priests also happen to be pedophiles and idolaters. If your teachers and the doctrine they teach bears such wicked fruits, ask yourself if indeed it is The Holy Spirit guiding them. The truth shall set us free. God's word and The Holy Spirit is enough for holiness and righteous life it just takes a believer to submit to God and resist the devil in order to clearly understand and follow God's commands. If the Holy Spirit is you, he will teach you and help you understand God's word including many things your pastor can ever teach you. God does not practice favoritism, he gives freely to everyone who asks him with a pure heart not only to priests or the pope.
@@MystoRobot I don't mean to insult anyone but these same mortal human priests also happen to be pedophiles and idolaters. If your teachers and the doctrine they teach bears such wicked fruits, ask yourself if indeed it is The Holy Spirit guiding them. The truth shall set us free. God's word and The Holy Spirit is enough for holiness and righteous life it just takes a believer to submit to God and resist the devil in order to clearly understand and follow God's commands. If the Holy Spirit is you, he will teach you and help you understand God's word including many things your pastor can ever teach you. God does not practice favoritism, he gives freely to everyone who asks him with a pure heart not only to priests or the pope.
@Lord Farquaad
Sorry, youtube didn't send me a notice. Here's my answer:
Tell me Farquaad...
Wouldn't you want to know *with assurance* how you can avoid eternal damnation, and reach Heaven? Who's insights would you logically consider, then?
*The Catholic Church:*
2000 years of documented existence, theological knowledge and unchanging dogmatic practices. Interpretations backed by and shared with the Early Church _(even in the first centuries)._ The New Testament canon was established and declared inspired/infallible through her authority. Sent thousands of missionaries all around the globe to preach the Gospel several centuries before the first ever protestant church even existed.
*Joe Smith who lives down the street:*
Was born in another denomination which originally spit from X... which split from X... which split from X... which originally split away from the Catholic Church less than 500 years ago. One day though, Joe decided that _HE_was inspired, and not the rest of his congregation. He began preaching on his own, starting a new denomination, calling it something like "New Reconstituted Baptist Fellowship of What Gives", which supposedly holds the fullness of the Truth, even though his teachings doctrinally differs from those of everyone else... and was never preached this way before. Oh, and he uses the Bible, but says the Catholic Church doesn't really understand the book they were inspired to compile.
PS: if you're non-denominational, it doesn't change anything: you're just a church onto yourself.
I seriously hope you see the God-willed purposed of ONE authoritative Church.
*Scripture never suggested or prophesied the necessity for a schism...* though, *PLENTY of warning about false shepherds.*
Could just be me but annihilation sound pretty good if you ask me
You notice that everyone considers these as "beliefs?" A belief is different from understanding. Beliefs are feelings, hearsay, and hopeful wishes and not provable. Understanding can be demonstrated, proven, and scientifically explained. There haven't been any religious events that can meet the latter criteria.
This is a great and informative video!
I'm a 7th Day Adventist (SDA) it would be cool if you could make a dedicated video about my church's history
That is a great idea, then everyone can learn about Ellen G White who made a bunch of prophecies which didn't actually come true. More 7th day Adventist should learn their church history.
You need to really study that out yourself. The Bible says keeping the law is a curse and it is not of faith. The Sabbath day is supposed to be kept everyday in our hearts not according to the old law.
@@michaelzimmerman8959 Jesus kept the 4th commandment which is to rest on SATURDAY! If he broke the law, our eternity is lost
@@michaelzimmerman8959 read in the Epistles of Paul his struggles with the Judaizers trying to corrupt the recently saved by preaching salvation through the practice of the law rather than faith
@@adancitomaldonado2198 when Jesus was resurrected it was on SUNDAY and thereafter it has been called the LORD's day which is why we practice the worship of His church on that day....the KEEPERS of the law still observe the Sabbath
All of you church leader at every level must begin to repent. Yes, every denomination, every church, every pastor, everyone. From genuine life changing repentance comes the seeking the face of the Lord. From life altering repentance comes the asking of the Holy Spirit to purify your entire being and then dwelling within always. This is when a very real revival can begin. But, first the old dead you must die and become like ash blown by the Holy Winds of God. This must begin in every denomination, every church, every pastor, every theologian, everyone.
What "Speaking in Tongues" originally & actually was & is / mean(t/s) to speak to the Audience in their Tongue; as they speak. That is, in such a way as they would in their own home. And those who have eyes to see and ears to hear in order to, "read the room" so-to-speak, do that more easily. Today, we call that, "Code Switching". Getting up in front of everybody and trying to play Van Halen's "Eruption" on the mouth organ may have a personal benefit and even a social benefit but, that's not what Speaking in Tongues truly is. It is the way in which the Conveyor of the Word is best presented as Shepard and Angel.
The lost man has been found When he spoke it was Like thunder and in the distance a Voice Could be heard the fallen shall no longer be downtrodden They shall be lifted up