India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
Crossbows were made way before plate armor. It also did not pierce plate armor at all. Unless it was very badly made. It pierced mail armor, and gambeson which was usually all a foot soldier could afford (if anything) a full suit of plate was hella expensive and only the richest could afford It.
@@user-ie5tt2xd6w No - crossbows often had to use a hand crank to slowly prime, thanks to their incredibly high tension, also, plate armour has been around since before the roman empire, crossbows have not.
Just so u know chief uttp made a video about a woman crying about her dog CAUSE OUR VIDEOSđđđđđARE BETTER IM TALKING ABOUT CABT YFGA AND OBVIOUSLY UTTP
WE INDIANS SHOULD CONSIDER USING DEODORANT AND STOP BEING STUBBORNđđŸđ𧥠many people were complaning about us polluting the air with sweats from armpits, sorry guysâ€â€
Depends on the armor actually. Some armor was designed to deflect arrows and could effectively divert bullets as well, though it would have to be smaller calibers
@@haterodiadordeplantao.680very rarely, long bows and crossbows were made for mail, not plate, thereâs a reason why plate armor was still effective even well after the introduction of the hand cannon
Fr lmao the arrows more than likely would just glance off, but if they did get a nice solid penetration they wouldnât make it very far, and almost certainly would not reach the man inside. Through all the layers đ
Yeah all the tests Iâve seen of plate armor is that arrows canât get through. 150-200 mph is just not enough to bite if there is any kind of angle other than almost dead on 90 all the way around.
Plate armour was extremely effective at stopping arrows and bolts from crossbows. Blunt weapons were best as a big hit to the head still caused a concussion, and could still dent the armour and make it awkward and uncomfortable to move in. You'd have to hit a gap in the armour with an arrow to do anything significant.
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
In one of my favorite books, which takes place in the last 19th century, the villain regularly wears medieval-style chainmail and plate armor. Early on in the book, he is shot three times with a revolver at point blank range and isn't even injured, but at the end of the book is somewhat easily stabbed with a saber through the armor.
Honestly, it would probably depend more on the bullet used⊠arrows had a hell of a lot more mass than any bullet, which in turn increased the actual force exerted by the projectile, even though it may not move as fast as a bullet, and thus wouldnât have the same piercing capability relative to something like flesh. But realistically, a 9mm or indeed most pistol rounds may be deflected by certain solid metal armors, depending on the thickness, ductility, etc.
Idk bro me personally as a knight in the medieval times I would like some netherite armor. Expensive as shit, but worth it. That knockback resistance can really help in a battlefield.
Depends on which type of plate armor, there are infact several designs used in the late ages that can stop small caliber, they improved armor to protect against constantly improving crossbows
Indeed, and fire arms did exist around the same time before Plate went out of fashion, it's not like flintlocks and muskets just suddenly spawned after the first pole cannon and no one wore armor again. The reason plate was out of fashion is because armies became too big to supply everyone with armor not because it was entirely ineffective.
crossbows arent more armour piercing than bows, they are just easier to use you load, point at the person and pull the "trigger" while bows need A LOT of training to be effective, yes they fire a lot faster, but need way more skill and strength unless of course you are talking about the "big ones" but using a weapon that can knock down a horse on a knight is the equivalent of using an anti-material rifle against soldiers
@@certainty_of_steel5601 The only thing diffrent in case of guns, is that they still trabsmit a lot of blunt force, even when stopped. But as of writing this I undersrood, arrows do too, so I have no point.
Fun fact: In the year ~1000 AD, China had some primitive guns and needed armor against it because of civil wars, so they designed a type of armor that deflects the pellets and makes it go through different chambers, stopping the pellet (can stop up to a 9mm), then in late Yuan/ early Ming, Japan went to war with China, having inferior firearms, they designed a more modern like samurai armor made to stop pellets (and 9mm). Technically those are medieval anti-bullets armor (medieval ages 500-1450)
That wasn't real armor, though. Yes, it worked as armor, but that was just repurposed hardened steel from a minecart (if memory serves). It was basically a rough cut thick slab of steel, similar to what you would use when going plinking. Medieval armor was actually made to be pretty thin because you had to cover the whole body with it, and you would die of exhaustion before you died from getting hit in the head with a big stick if your armor was a half inch thick or more all around.
It is. Just because a hammer was the most efficient thing you had doesn't mean it was super effective. It still took a good hit to actually dent the armor.
It's not just energy, it's also the surface area. Because arrows and less surface area the energy was focused in a smaller point, thus having an easier time penetrating the target.
It depends on the kind of armor and the kind of weapon. They were still using plate armor in the era of muskets and pistols, they just changed the design to compensate for the new problems. There were also plate armor designs used in World War I and World War II which could stop bullets.
âArrows can pierce plate armorâ you know, i wonder why plate armor was made in the first placeđ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€
@@TiernanOlearyExactly, lol. I see so many people arguing that bodkin tips can pierce steel plate. Itâs the stupidest thing ever. Not even those huge windlass crossbows with a crazy amount of draw weight could fully pierce the steel armor. It was expensive for a reason. It worked.
The arrow depends on the thickness of armor, 3mm of steel? Could go through, at least, if it wasn't curved (and all plate was pretty much curved.) 1mm of steel is relatively easy to go through. 2mm likely at close range.
They actually did make breastplates that were able to withstand bullets. In fact, youâll often find these breastplates with impact from a bullet on them. This was often done by the very smith who made it as a way to test his work. Granted, the damage that firearms could cause quickly outpaced the protective capacity of plate armor, but still.
Not to be the "Um, ackshually..." guy, but plate armor was actually pretty good at stopping arrows and other piercing weapons (to a degree. It would not come near to stopping a bullet), and measured quite terrible against blunt force trauma from maces, hammers and other such weapons
Not against crossbows and to a lesser extent long bows (particularly the English version). The crossbow was outlawed (with about as much success as outlawing firearms has been in modern times) for that very reason.
watch a video made by tods workshop and you will realise well made plate armor is practically invincible to maces and such. you need a polearm to have enough blunt force to get trough
Arrows penetrate chainmail, yes. (You would have several layers underneath though) But plate armor deflected arrows easily. Since thereâs no âflatâ area for the arrow to go trough. Joints were vulnerable though but unlikely to get hit by arrows. Thatâs why they started using cannons and firearms. And even then smaller calibers and bullets were still deflected for a time or didnât go trough. Itâs only after mass production of firearms and increased accuracy that armors were abandoned.
The armour of the Middle Age was huge masterpieces of engineering. It was designed to be strong enough to protect you again slices, heavy punches and stitches but keep the weight low as possible while also minimize the lost in maneuverability.
I saw a video a dude made and he weighed a suit of armor at the museum he worked in and it came out to 81lbs for an entire suit head to toe pretty astonishing
@@RobertNowagarskiit can be even lighter than that iirc. I remember a video of a guy in full plate armor running around and doing summersaults and handstands. It really didnât reduce mobility much at all.
Wow! Isnât that what humans have been doing for millenniaâs now? Maximising the protection they have to balance the weapons available at the time???
That's actually incorrect. The majority of plate armor was designed to also stop arrows, which were also accompanied by hardened leather, and chain mail unders. Which made it nearly impossible for an arrow to pass through.
Some were designed to resist bullets, the term bulletproof comes from a test armors did to resist bullets, the bulge was the proof it resisted bullets.
Plate armor stops all arrows and bolts. Plus plate armor can stop pistol caliber bullets. That's why some soviet soldiers in WW2 wore metal breastplate. But rifle bullets shoot right through
High power crossbows could pierce even some of the plate armors straight through, but those things had like 6x time power of a very strong bow. Their shape was designed to deflect the projectiles to the side though, so that unless it hits perpendicular to the plate, it had a chance of not piercing. Anything with "normal power" got stopped. However any musket or a flintlock could penetrate plate armor. That's the reason why they phased out of use. They did use plate armor breastplates to stop shrapnel in WW1, but the soldiers hated it. Funny enough, even today soldiers use breastplate - they call it the "plate carrier" these days. As far as I know, it is capable of stopping a rifle round if thick enough.
@@darthbane5357 Pistols don't have that much penetrative power. If you shoot a handgun against a well made plate armor, it will most likely not penetrate.
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
Put the chainmail on top, add a modern bullet proof vest in next layer, then add the full metal armour at the bottom layer. You got an impenetrable ultimate armour
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
@@kartoffelschloss6425 look up any accurate test ever made and it disagrees with you. Arrows where a suppressing weapon, shot as many as you can to try to injure someone, lucky if you hot the gaps in the armor but even then arrows rarely actually pierced into flesh or where a killing blow. Some tests shows that even just a gambeson can block arrows at times, depending on draw weight and such
â@kartoffelschloss6425 Jesus christ this again. If you have enough archers shooting at something at close range, you're going to kill things. Agincourt was not a normal circumstance, and the archers spent much of their time in the melee.
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
âYes, @@G_egg173. Cuirassers literally have bullet dents as proof of quality. You only meant modern WW1 guns or more advanced, because many Africans managed to repel gubpowder-based Europeans with just a weak shield and spear during the Colonial era.
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
Once you go into the era where both guns and armor were a thing, armor makers were required to shoot their armor, and the mark was a âbullet proofâ (thatâs where that came from) so Armor from that period would 100% be able to stop a bullet
It is well documented that since the XVI century armor usage started to decline due to it's ineffectiveness in deflecting bullets and other major changes in war tactics
Not a modern bullet tho, do you really think medieval armor would stop a 9mm that can go through a car?đ those musket like weapons, yes, were not likely to penetrate, but modern weapons..
â@@angelmatesmolan Common misconception. The actual reason was cost of production and time of training. It's easier and cheaper to instruct a rando to use a gun than a bow or fight on armor, thus this was prioritized because massive numbers often win against small numbers with good equipment up to a point. Armor is actually quite capable of stopping bullets, the Flying Hussars basically soloed every confrontation against firearms with a stomping victory, and even before them there're records of dukes riding with Heavy Plate Armor, receiving 30 shots and coming out unscathed.
They do stop arrows, you could even see videos testing it, plate armor is thick and is supposed to stop many weapons, they only stopped making it when guns appeared, they then invented the cuirass which actually stopped guns back in the time, they were tested, plate armor is very durable, and is very strong, the only way it could be penetrated by arrows is by the small little gaps, which were very hard to shoot at, because plate armor has barely any gaps, and sometimes it could stop bullets like 9mm, and many other weak types, the only âplateâ armor that canât stop arrows are the cosplay non historically accurate ones, and of course ancient armor wouldnât be able to stop a bullet, but in some cases plate armor has been able to stop bullets, and most knights with plate armor, mostly had a shield with them, that could also stop arrows, this video is probably one of the most biased thing Iâve ever seen about armor, if its able to stop blunt force weapons, and swords, it could easily stop a arrow, because it deflects off of it, even tanks use similar stuff like this, it deflects bullets, and the weirdest part about this animation, is that the plate armor is literally curved, which arrows cannot shoot at, which makes absolutely no sense, imagine shooting a arrow at a metal refrigerator, what would happen? And what else would happened if it was curved, hard and curved armor was way more than enough to stop arrows, and remember that short about plate carriers stopping bullets but still having pain? Thatâs kinda like plate armor, but it was designed to not make the user feel any, but blunt force only did that, and seeing arrows pierce through rounded objects hurts my brain.
Modern problems require modern solutions â
Ancient problems require modern solutions â
Guns are quit ancient actually đ€
Iâm before uttp on this comment
â@@goodnightmyprince6734 Now where the guns go after quit?
@@goodnightmyprince6734No they arenât. Guns are only at most a millennium old.
ancient problems require the american way of solutions
"if you used a modern weapon against ancient protection it wouldn't work" what a shocker
It is to some people.
â@@ozgurruh2535sadly
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
AS AN INDIAN, SORRY FOR OUR EXPIRED CURRY SCENTED BO đ WE ARE WORKING HARD TO SHOWER EVERYDAY AND USE DEODORANT â€â€
â@@NerdskeepmaldingAUTTPyou're a bot too...
"if you shot a bullet at ancient armour, youll get kicked out the museum"
đđđ
Lolđđđ
đ€Łđ€Łđ€Łđ€Łâđ
Top commentđđđ
đđ
Plate armor was actually VERY good at stopping arrows. Hence the creation of the crossbow which was easier to use and had better penetrating power
Crossbows were made way before plate armor. It also did not pierce plate armor at all. Unless it was very badly made. It pierced mail armor, and gambeson which was usually all a foot soldier could afford (if anything) a full suit of plate was hella expensive and only the richest could afford It.
Then the handgonne came along and slowly put an end to that.
Also plate armor was not very good against blunt force
Only select arrow/bow/user combinations could pierce *plate*. Most times you'd see only mail being pierced
@@user-ie5tt2xd6w No - crossbows often had to use a hand crank to slowly prime, thanks to their incredibly high tension, also, plate armour has been around since before the roman empire, crossbows have not.
How to piss off medieval armour enthusiasts 101
Exactly bruh
Like they even forgot about ned kelly who literally used metal armor and was basically invincible
Remember that Ned Kellyâs armor was 6mm thick, weighed 95lb for a helmet and cuirass, aswell as being shot as with black powder weaponry
They would test cuirasses in the Renaissance by shooting them đ not to mention chainmail was used to stop arrows alongside gambesons
@@vysukie9050yea thatâs what Iâm talking about
Yeah... I just got pissed đ
Even the ancient armor is labeled as Zack đâ ïž
A bot has been spotted. Please ignore them as they just want attention.
I LOVE READING QURAN CAUSE MY VIDEOS ARE BETTER
Just so u know chief uttp made a video about a woman crying about her dog CAUSE OUR VIDEOSđđđđđARE BETTER IM TALKING ABOUT CABT YFGA AND OBVIOUSLY UTTP
Bros reply section is literally just bots (except me)
@@Brookalt eh, atleast theres a AUTTP bot
"âŠUnless its a magical armor."
-Unknown Blacksmith Dwarf
WE INDIANS SHOULD CONSIDER USING DEODORANT AND STOP BEING STUBBORNđđŸđ𧥠many people were complaning about us polluting the air with sweats from armpits, sorry guysâ€â€
â@@cowdians5.01.wrong video
2.your a bot
Heat Seeking missile:
âIF YOuƱĂșĂ»-â is the funniest thing ever.
LOL
Depends on the armor actually. Some armor was designed to deflect arrows and could effectively divert bullets as well, though it would have to be smaller calibers
Don't translate...
Wenn Sie es mögen und abonnieren, wird Ihr Fluch verschwinden
@@SOLDIER_utts very shoddy German there, little guy
â@planterion7969 I speak like practically no german, and I can tell they messed that sentence up
Yup. There are literal videos that plate can stop even the heaviest bows.
Zacks info team has been slacking lately.
Doesnât even need to be specific armor, leather armor could stop arrows
Plate armor had NO problems stopping arrows
There is more than one type of arrow, and they could pierce armor and kill.
@@haterodiadordeplantao.680very rarely, long bows and crossbows were made for mail, not plate, thereâs a reason why plate armor was still effective even well after the introduction of the hand cannon
Not every bullet is Armour piercing â@@haterodiadordeplantao.680
Innit fr
This is the only comment I've found so far with no bots congrats
Ah yes
"parry this you filty casual!"
Plate armor specialized in stopping arrows... crushing attacks were quite effective against plate as well.
Props to the guy who went back in time with a gun to confirm this theory
lol
đ
FINALLY, NO MORE BOTS
This will be a good reply section without any bots
Ever heard of recreating this armors into modern day/world?
Plate armour was incredible at stopping arrows lmao
Fr lmao the arrows more than likely would just glance off, but if they did get a nice solid penetration they wouldnât make it very far, and almost certainly would not reach the man inside. Through all the layers đ
There were even designs made so that the arrow would deflect somewhere other than your face.
Yeah all the tests Iâve seen of plate armor is that arrows canât get through. 150-200 mph is just not enough to bite if there is any kind of angle other than almost dead on 90 all the way around.
agreed
Right, whoever made this video watched too many movies. He also thinks plate was good against blunt forceđ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł
Plate armour was extremely effective at stopping arrows and bolts from crossbows. Blunt weapons were best as a big hit to the head still caused a concussion, and could still dent the armour and make it awkward and uncomfortable to move in. You'd have to hit a gap in the armour with an arrow to do anything significant.
Respect to the people that tried this
The bullet really said "ITS ABOUT DRIVE ITS ABOUT POWER!"
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
you are not a real person.
â@CABTemperoraiden bro-
ââ@@Troothy-q6dwhat is even the purpose of this promotion
WE STAY HUNGRY WE DEVOUR
Reminder: Donât forget to bring a gun to a knight fight
lol
armourers of the later period literally tested their products by shooting them. We have surviving examples.
In one of my favorite books, which takes place in the last 19th century, the villain regularly wears medieval-style chainmail and plate armor. Early on in the book, he is shot three times with a revolver at point blank range and isn't even injured, but at the end of the book is somewhat easily stabbed with a saber through the armor.
Honestly, it would probably depend more on the bullet used⊠arrows had a hell of a lot more mass than any bullet, which in turn increased the actual force exerted by the projectile, even though it may not move as fast as a bullet, and thus wouldnât have the same piercing capability relative to something like flesh. But realistically, a 9mm or indeed most pistol rounds may be deflected by certain solid metal armors, depending on the thickness, ductility, etc.
Right off the bat the use of "ancient" makes me sigh out loud
I CARE + KEEP IT UP + UR THE GOAT + HAVE A GOOD DAY
I CARE + KEEP IT UP + UR THE GOAT + HAVE A GOOD DAY
I CARE + KEEP IT UP + UR THE GOAT + HAVE A GOOD DAY
â@@бŃŃŃ _ĐŒĐŸĐŒĐ”ĐœŃ oh wtf
A good bot???â@@бŃŃŃ _ĐŒĐŸĐŒĐ”ĐœŃ
Chain armour in real life: đ
Chain armour in MC: đ
Was waiting for a Minecraft reference xD
Idk bro me personally as a knight in the medieval times I would like some netherite armor.
Expensive as shit, but worth it. That knockback resistance can really help in a battlefield.
@@lab_leo8 I'll rather defeat the ender dragon in iron armour
â@@lab_leo8
I would love to see ya move with all that clunky netherite.
Chain leggings and chain helmet are cool
Imagine wearing a bullet-proof vest under ancient armor
itâs like slapping water, flathand it spreads around and you can not really piece it but with a hand vertically itâs easy.
Depends on which type of plate armor, there are infact several designs used in the late ages that can stop small caliber, they improved armor to protect against constantly improving crossbows
Indeed, and fire arms did exist around the same time before Plate went out of fashion, it's not like flintlocks and muskets just suddenly spawned after the first pole cannon and no one wore armor again. The reason plate was out of fashion is because armies became too big to supply everyone with armor not because it was entirely ineffective.
They can stop high caliber from the time as well. Up to 45 caliber from an arquebus
Just use modern armor.
@@allexsanchez2714 That's not the topic, go back to CoD if you aren't interested in actually engaging in the conversation.
crossbows arent more armour piercing than bows, they are just easier to use
you load, point at the person and pull the "trigger"
while bows need A LOT of training to be effective, yes they fire a lot faster, but need way more skill and strength
unless of course you are talking about the "big ones"
but using a weapon that can knock down a horse on a knight is the equivalent of using an anti-material rifle against soldiers
Armour is designed to stop arrows. An arrow would not go through plate armour unless very specific conditions are met đ
Like having the archer know where the weak, thinner spots on the armor are and getting the perfect 90° angle.
â@vis6954 and having a sufficiently powerful bow or crossbow with the right ammunition, too.
@@certainty_of_steel5601 The only thing diffrent in case of guns, is that they still trabsmit a lot of blunt force, even when stopped. But as of writing this I undersrood, arrows do too, so I have no point.
Modern bow can shoot through an amor but yeah, medieval bow wonât be able to do much against armor.
A reply bot as been detected donât respond and report it immediately
Bro took âwhy are u bulling meâ to a whole new level đđ
Now I understand the use of the chain armor of Minecraft. đ
"Some people think it could stop the impact"
Meanwhile me having watched a fistful of dollars
Fun fact: In the year ~1000 AD, China had some primitive guns and needed armor against it because of civil wars, so they designed a type of armor that deflects the pellets and makes it go through different chambers, stopping the pellet (can stop up to a 9mm), then in late Yuan/ early Ming, Japan went to war with China, having inferior firearms, they designed a more modern like samurai armor made to stop pellets (and 9mm).
Technically those are medieval anti-bullets armor (medieval ages 500-1450)
@@poka26ev2those guns were really scuffed the most common cartridge nowadays (22lr) is going to be the most it can stop
@@Freedomman2butthesecond
Iâm not in the USA, also the medieval armor is Asian and the most common bullets in East Asia is the 2.7mm zinc pellets
That wasn't real armor, though. Yes, it worked as armor, but that was just repurposed hardened steel from a minecart (if memory serves). It was basically a rough cut thick slab of steel, similar to what you would use when going plinking. Medieval armor was actually made to be pretty thin because you had to cover the whole body with it, and you would die of exhaustion before you died from getting hit in the head with a big stick if your armor was a half inch thick or more all around.
Finally, a comment that's not filled with sick bots
The moment he said "plate armor is better at deflecting strikes" he lost me đ
plate mail was weak to blunts, xD
â@@tibiakanaiy01 it was stronger against blunts than chain mail
and what is that knowledge from? Video games?
@@Coolguy98765đđđ that why war hammers have the pointy end sir.
It is. Just because a hammer was the most efficient thing you had doesn't mean it was super effective. It still took a good hit to actually dent the armor.
âIf you shot a bulletâ right away!đ
It's not just energy, it's also the surface area. Because arrows and less surface area the energy was focused in a smaller point, thus having an easier time penetrating the target.
Plate harness is well known to stop arrows from penetrating.
Here is an idea for the next video: *Secrets Inside Pyramids*
im stealing this idea for my vid
@@user-sx2rn5sl3m Good luck bro
@@user-sx2rn5sl3m Good luck bro
Literally just mummies
@user-sx2rn5sl3m NOBODY knows you bro đ
Even the armor and shield are branded đđđđđđđđđđđđđđđđđđ
It depends on the kind of armor and the kind of weapon. They were still using plate armor in the era of muskets and pistols, they just changed the design to compensate for the new problems. There were also plate armor designs used in World War I and World War II which could stop bullets.
âArrows can pierce plate armorâ you know, i wonder why plate armor was made in the first placeđ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€đ€
It could stop bullets and arrows
@@TiernanOlearyExactly, lol. I see so many people arguing that bodkin tips can pierce steel plate. Itâs the stupidest thing ever. Not even those huge windlass crossbows with a crazy amount of draw weight could fully pierce the steel armor. It was expensive for a reason. It worked.
@@tacc8677 yeah
ÊáŽÊᎠÊáŽÒáŽÊᎠáŽáŽáŽáŽs
@@MatraxEnjoyer I shall bully them
Most plate armours could easily deflect any arrow from any distance. Bullets would have a hard time penetrating harness + chain mail + under garnment
đđąđșđŁđŠ a low velocity pistol round. 5.56 at 3100fps has been shown to penetrate hardened ar500 plate armor
Depends on the armor and depends on the bullet/caliber.
The arrow depends on the thickness of armor, 3mm of steel? Could go through, at least, if it wasn't curved (and all plate was pretty much curved.)
1mm of steel is relatively easy to go through. 2mm likely at close range.
Depending on the bullet though
You could hide behind a tree in full plate armor and it's not stopping any rifle round after the invention of smokeless powder
Arrows can't actually get through medieval armor but a bullet can
They actually did make breastplates that were able to withstand bullets. In fact, youâll often find these breastplates with impact from a bullet on them.
This was often done by the very smith who made it as a way to test his work.
Granted, the damage that firearms could cause quickly outpaced the protective capacity of plate armor, but still.
You can also find examples of dents put in with tools to fraudulently simulate pistol proving
Not to be the "Um, ackshually..." guy, but plate armor was actually pretty good at stopping arrows and other piercing weapons (to a degree. It would not come near to stopping a bullet), and measured quite terrible against blunt force trauma from maces, hammers and other such weapons
Not against crossbows and to a lesser extent long bows (particularly the English version). The crossbow was outlawed (with about as much success as outlawing firearms has been in modern times) for that very reason.
Mornings Cutlet.
watch a video made by tods workshop and you will realise well made plate armor is practically invincible to maces and such. you need a polearm to have enough blunt force to get trough
@@haikjeft2767 hi Haikjeft! Fancy seeing you here
@@powerbox5451 alright, I'll be sure to check it out
Arrows penetrate chainmail, yes. (You would have several layers underneath though)
But plate armor deflected arrows easily. Since thereâs no âflatâ area for the arrow to go trough. Joints were vulnerable though but unlikely to get hit by arrows.
Thatâs why they started using cannons and firearms. And even then smaller calibers and bullets were still deflected for a time or didnât go trough.
Itâs only after mass production of firearms and increased accuracy that armors were abandoned.
Chainmail was in fact incredibly good at deflecting arrows without specialized tips
The gnomes finna win the war with this oneđŁïžđŁïžđ„đ„
The armour of the Middle Age was huge masterpieces of engineering. It was designed to be strong enough to protect you again slices, heavy punches and stitches but keep the weight low as possible while also minimize the lost in maneuverability.
I saw a video a dude made and he weighed a suit of armor at the museum he worked in and it came out to 81lbs for an entire suit head to toe pretty astonishing
Filipino medieval armor was said to block early musket shots if they were slow enough in velocity. True works of art
@@RobertNowagarskiit can be even lighter than that iirc. I remember a video of a guy in full plate armor running around and doing summersaults and handstands. It really didnât reduce mobility much at all.
Wow! Isnât that what humans have been doing for millenniaâs now? Maximising the protection they have to balance the weapons available at the time???
never bring a gun to a sword fight
You mean never bring a sword to a gun fight?
No, itâs never bring a musket to a spear fight.
With the way he's holding that gun he probably wouldn't hit anything.
"This is why people created bulets"
And thatâs exactly why we have bulletproof vests
This video gives "I'm bored so imma spread harmless misinformation" vibes.
That's actually incorrect. The majority of plate armor was designed to also stop arrows, which were also accompanied by hardened leather, and chain mail unders. Which made it nearly impossible for an arrow to pass through.
You lost me by "hardened leather." Leather armor would've been incredibly rare back then, if it even exists.
â@@9308323you'd be amazed at how much easier it is to skin a large animal than to gather the materials needed and forge them into anything useful.
@@9308323 leather wasn't used as armor but as a base material to attach metal armor elements to.
ââ@@9308323 gambesons existed and were quite strong. You would see those under amour all the time
â@@9308323Leather is pretty darn ancient. I know for a fact that Native Americans used it.
The French knights had been real quiet since this one dropped...
âClearly armor could stop the thing that made armor completely irrelevant.â
Designed to resist bullets â
Designed to resist swords â
Some were designed to resist bullets, the term bulletproof comes from a test armors did to resist bullets, the bulge was the proof it resisted bullets.
Research never went beyond Hollywood with this one
People really think dudes walked around in armor as thick as machinery metal
Idk why this information felt so useful to me lol
He's labeling every thing like he owns itđ
I think in his animation, he does đ
Watermarking. Content stealing is a real shameful thing ngl
That help him to prevent someone else from stealing his video.
Shockingly he does
Bro is obsessed with guns
Don't translate
à€à€”à€šà„à€€à€ à€¶à€Ÿà€Șà€żà€€à€Ÿà€,à€à€”à€€à€ à€¶à€°à„à€°à€ à€čà„à€Šà€Żà€ à€ à€¶à„à€”à€ à€à€Ÿà€°à„à€Żà€ à€žà„à€„à€à€Żà€żà€·à„à€Żà€€à€ż,à€à€€à€€à„ à€šà€żà€”à€Ÿà€°à€Żà€żà€€à„à€ à€à€à€źà€Ÿà€€à„à€°à€ à€źà€Ÿà€°à„à€à€ à€źà€ź à€à„à€šà€Čà€žà„à€Ż à€žà€Šà€žà„à€Żà€€à€Ÿà€ à€à„à€čà„à€Łà€Ÿà€€à€ż....
A reply bot has been detected on this comment, please ignore it and report it. Don't interact with the bot it feeds off your attention! 87439
Fr
Don't translate
à€à€”à€šà„à€€à€ à€¶à€Ÿà€Șà€żà€€à€Ÿà€,à€à€”à€€à€ à€¶à€°à„à€°à€ à€čà„à€Šà€Żà€ à€ à€¶à„à€”à€ à€à€Ÿà€°à„à€Żà€ à€žà„à€„à€à€Żà€żà€·à„à€Żà€€à€ż,à€à€€à€€à„ à€šà€żà€”à€Ÿà€°à€Żà€żà€€à„à€ à€à€à€źà€Ÿà€€à„à€°à€ à€źà€Ÿà€°à„à€à€ à€źà€ź à€à„à€šà€Čà€žà„à€Ż à€žà€Šà€žà„à€Żà€€à€Ÿà€ à€à„à€čà„à€Łà€Ÿà€€à€ż....
11 out of 12 replies being bots is crazy. CZcams needs to fix this ASAP
Imagine chainmail and plate armour were worn at once = an ancient juggernaut
đ thatâs the whole point buddy you wear both
You literally do wear chainmail under plate armour, even sometimes with leather padding too.
Leather, then bulletproof plate, then chainmail, then plate armour, then blast-proof EOD
Knight were anciant juggernauts
â@@Cool1stYou forgot to equip your m249
The anime gate hilariously shows this exact situation
Plate armor stops all arrows and bolts. Plus plate armor can stop pistol caliber bullets. That's why some soviet soldiers in WW2 wore metal breastplate.
But rifle bullets shoot right through
High power crossbows could pierce even some of the plate armors straight through, but those things had like 6x time power of a very strong bow.
Their shape was designed to deflect the projectiles to the side though, so that unless it hits perpendicular to the plate, it had a chance of not piercing. Anything with "normal power" got stopped.
However any musket or a flintlock could penetrate plate armor. That's the reason why they phased out of use.
They did use plate armor breastplates to stop shrapnel in WW1, but the soldiers hated it.
Funny enough, even today soldiers use breastplate - they call it the "plate carrier" these days. As far as I know, it is capable of stopping a rifle round if thick enough.
Plate armour canât even stop 9mm stop the cap.
Also soviets wore plate armour to stop shrapnel, not repel bullets.
No it can't
@@darthbane5357 Pistols don't have that much penetrative power. If you shoot a handgun against a well made plate armor, it will most likely not penetrate.
@@kalkovonschpritzendorf1914 czcams.com/video/JIYFCjZKDio/video.htmlsi=FXDicvP5sXR5QopZ
Bro is entering his villain arc
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
AS AN INDIAN, SORRY FOR OUR EXPIRED CURRY SCENTED BO đ WE ARE WORKING HARD TO SHOWER EVERYDAY AND USE DEODORANT â€â€
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
Bro so many bots wtf is happening
"Don't bring gun in the medieval fight"
>deflecting strikes
>animation of a puncture weapon made for plate
Bullet proof vest with chainmail đż
Bro invincible
.50 BMG: You sure about that?
â@@maksimjurczenko3659didnt ask
Put the chainmail on top, add a modern bullet proof vest in next layer, then add the full metal armour at the bottom layer. You got an impenetrable ultimate armour
Back then I think chain armor was the best invention ever made. Hands down.
Extremely helpful. I have an ancient armour to stop bullets.
My man's cooked at the endđâ ïž
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
He did not dissapoint us! đŁđŻ.,,
Your comment is also being cooked by bots.
đż
ONG IM SO SORRY YOUR REPLIES ARE FILLED WITH BOTđđ€ŠđŒââïž Iâm gonna report all the bots
Time to report all the bots in this section holy heck
How to lose a battle:
Use Zack D Films armor.
BOTS ARE COMING! I REPEAT BOTS ARE COMING!
His version of plate armor doesnt protect you from arrows
Thank you for fine warningâ@@RemyVRplayer
@LDkezinNO ONG GO AWAY
UTTP IS PREPARED + WATCH OUT,..đŁ
Never make Zack a villain.
1. Most arrows couldnât penetrate armor however long bows and crossbows were exceptions.
This guy never ever runs out of ideas
Ancient armor: "your version is out of date"
NOBODY ASKED RUSSIA IS BETTER THAN ZACKDFILMS đ„đ„
Underated comment
@OfficerMAP_Pridewhich one do you want. Baseball to the face. Or pellet rifle to the eye you choose
Nobody asked my videos are better
@@Idkisme529 stop feeding the goddamn trolls đđđđ
this british tea sh*t aint stopping a bulletđ
Can we just stop for a second and appreciate the work of the people in zacks videos who volunteer just to educate us
Next video: could a modern day nuke actually destroy a castle...lets find out
Arrows do NOT pierce plate armor đ
Google the Battle of Agincourt. The French would strongly disagree with you.
@@kartoffelschloss6425 look up any accurate test ever made and it disagrees with you. Arrows where a suppressing weapon, shot as many as you can to try to injure someone, lucky if you hot the gaps in the armor but even then arrows rarely actually pierced into flesh or where a killing blow. Some tests shows that even just a gambeson can block arrows at times, depending on draw weight and such
â@kartoffelschloss6425 Jesus christ this again. If you have enough archers shooting at something at close range, you're going to kill things. Agincourt was not a normal circumstance, and the archers spent much of their time in the melee.
John wick realizing he has multiple bullet holes in his body adter taking off his armored suit đ
âHey what armor did you get? ZACK D FILMSâ
Currasiers having literal bullet dents as a form of quality:
Yeah, Zack is full of shit
Zack is now traumatizing ancient warriors
A reply bot has been detected on this comment, please ignore it and report it. Don't interact with the bot it feeds off your attention! 27476
AS AN INDIAN, SORRY FOR OUR EXPIRED CURRY SCENTED BO đ WE ARE WORKING HARD TO SHOWER EVERYDAY AND USE DEODORANT â€â€
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
These bots
your so cringe and unoriginal
Chainmail in minecraft:Make you get hit by a sword
Chainmail in real life: no damage
Never bring medieval armour to a gun fight
I mean if you look at the Australian bushranger Ned Kelly he did exactly this and it worked until he got hung.
bro really thought a 0.5cm steel armor can stop bullet
â@@solenya4137i mean.. he was only hung because he forgot leg armour
âYes, @@G_egg173. Cuirassers literally have bullet dents as proof of quality. You only meant modern WW1 guns or more advanced, because many Africans managed to repel gubpowder-based Europeans with just a weak shield and spear during the Colonial era.
Bro can brand anything at this point đ
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
Fr once he branded the sky đ
We indians favourite dessert is cow du-cakeđźđ§our favourite drinking is cow pi- đźđ„ we consume it everyday thats why were so healthy đźđłâ€
India already won! They have many trophies such as cricket trophy, curry trophy, scam trophy, strongest smell trophy, uneducated trophy AND COW TROPHY đâ€â€â€
AS AN INDIAN, SORRY FOR OUR EXPIRED CURRY SCENTED BO đ WE ARE WORKING HARD TO SHOWER EVERYDAY AND USE DEODORANT â€â€
"Gordan doesn't need to hear all this. He's a highly trained professional!"
Once you go into the era where both guns and armor were a thing, armor makers were required to shoot their armor, and the mark was a âbullet proofâ (thatâs where that came from) so Armor from that period would 100% be able to stop a bullet
It is well documented that since the XVI century armor usage started to decline due to it's ineffectiveness in deflecting bullets and other major changes in war tactics
Not a modern bullet tho, do you really think medieval armor would stop a 9mm that can go through a car?đ those musket like weapons, yes, were not likely to penetrate, but modern weapons..
A reply bot as been detected donât respond and report it immediately
Depeends on calliber
â@@angelmatesmolan Common misconception. The actual reason was cost of production and time of training.
It's easier and cheaper to instruct a rando to use a gun than a bow or fight on armor, thus this was prioritized because massive numbers often win against small numbers with good equipment up to a point.
Armor is actually quite capable of stopping bullets, the Flying Hussars basically soloed every confrontation against firearms with a stomping victory, and even before them there're records of dukes riding with Heavy Plate Armor, receiving 30 shots and coming out unscathed.
They do stop arrows, you could even see videos testing it, plate armor is thick and is supposed to stop many weapons, they only stopped making it when guns appeared, they then invented the cuirass which actually stopped guns back in the time, they were tested, plate armor is very durable, and is very strong, the only way it could be penetrated by arrows is by the small little gaps, which were very hard to shoot at, because plate armor has barely any gaps, and sometimes it could stop bullets like 9mm, and many other weak types, the only âplateâ armor that canât stop arrows are the cosplay non historically accurate ones, and of course ancient armor wouldnât be able to stop a bullet, but in some cases plate armor has been able to stop bullets, and most knights with plate armor, mostly had a shield with them, that could also stop arrows, this video is probably one of the most biased thing Iâve ever seen about armor, if its able to stop blunt force weapons, and swords, it could easily stop a arrow, because it deflects off of it, even tanks use similar stuff like this, it deflects bullets, and the weirdest part about this animation, is that the plate armor is literally curved, which arrows cannot shoot at, which makes absolutely no sense, imagine shooting a arrow at a metal refrigerator, what would happen? And what else would happened if it was curved, hard and curved armor was way more than enough to stop arrows, and remember that short about plate carriers stopping bullets but still having pain? Thatâs kinda like plate armor, but it was designed to not make the user feel any, but blunt force only did that, and seeing arrows pierce through rounded objects hurts my brain.
How ia it biased lmao? Stop projecting your love for ancient weaponry and just accept the bullets would tear through any medievalbera armor
That being said, the knights at Agincourt had plate armor but the longbows were so suppressive in fire against them they struggled hard.
@@scottanos9981 that happened only once, and they are longbows.
@@leonardomz6257 It also happened at the battle of Crecy, and longbows are definitely bows.
@@scottanos9981that only happened not because the Knights were getting hit, but the Horses were getting hit
I love your content its so funny and educating
This is why slashing, bludgeoning and piercing are damage types
Bro went back in time to put his name onto the shields đ
My army wears this and now I'm even more concerned for my men.
dont worry, its minecraft. they respawn.
Every video you make is like a mini-movie.
Bro looks like he sould being a HEV suit lol
minecraft netherite armor be like: Nah I'd win
not only could plate armor deflect arrows, but some artifacts actually have marks from deflected musket balls.
Chain mail was actually pretty good at stopping bullets as long as you have enough layers I tested this with different calibers
minecraft armour has been quiet since this dropped
Bullet's can't go through riot shields but arrow's can
Depends on both the bullet and arrow type.
"So which armor you were using back then"
"Zack D Filmsđ"