SORA AI’s Problems [And Solutions]
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 05. 2024
- OpenAI's Sora has shown us that the future has arrived. But how did it come to be? What can it do? and what are the implications of such an AI system? In this episode we'll find out.
Podcast: • OpenAI's Sora Changes ...
Sam Altman Episode: • The Man Behind ChatGPT...
ColdFusion (Burn Water) Music:
/ @coldfusionmusic
burnwater.bandcamp.com
Get my book:
bit.ly/NewThinkingbook
ColdFusion Socials:
/ discord
/ coldfusiontv
/ coldfusion_tv
/ coldfusiontv - Věda a technologie
![ChatGPT Can Now Talk Like a Human [Latest Updates]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ID5tc61iksY/mqdefault.jpg)
For everyone that points out all the inaccuracies and glitches, this is the worst it will look ever again.
just 1 more paper down the line or like 3 years at max lol
Remember a year ago when Will Smith was eating spaghetti? Lol in 5 years it will be armageddon for parts of the film industry and the rise of deepfakes
Disagree. These are best-case examples for the current tech, don't expect every prompt output to look like that. Also just like with MJ there will forever be an uncanniness that feels eerie and wrong - and it is super evident once you have seen a lot of these AI generates images and videos. You will be trained to recognize the glitches and oddities and then they really give off bad vibes aking to seeing something unsettling, nightmaris, because it appears real but you know something is off. At least that is how it is for me after having generated 10k images on MJ. Only generic stuff looks good (portraits on MJ for example). The more specific you get the more eerie the output is. And the more eerie it gets the less people find this appealing. Only boomers on LinkedIn appreciate this stuff right now (look it up to understand what I mean)
Hehe. So true. Few actually get that.
Sora 3 will be it.
The more AI advances the more im compelled to go outside and touch some grass
For real dude. I feel like most of the comments are bots now especially on political videos.
@@ironknightgaming5706 probably bots promoting ai to inflate investments. There is no actual market for content generator as there will be so much content that it will be undiscoverable.
@@ironknightgaming5706 And financial videos.
Yeah it’s got to the (good) point to quit the addiction
Imagine how many jobs will be lost due to AI. This will basically kill videography.
Today: Crank out your own novel in one day.
Tomorrow: Turn that novel into a full-length movie in one day.
Yup
Who going to read it.. Ai
Imagine just dumping a pdf of the original star wars script into AI and seeing what it comes out with!
@@bofloa What happens when an author hires a ghostwriter? Who will read the work?
Today: The novel is generic rubbish
Tomorrow: The movie is generic rubbish
I'm no denier - I use ChatGPT and Midjourney almost every day - But none of it is ever going to light your reading or movie viewing fire like Papillon or Avatar or To Kill a Mockingbird - you know?
As an aspiring videographer, it's tough to explain. Over my years of camping and traveling, I've had some STUNNING visual experiences- sunrises on flooded salt flats, yelling from clifftops at the end of a hike, walking along beautiful valley streams. The idea that someday the beauty and rarity of those moments will be washed away and oversaturated by ai is tragic.
It's not about generative AI videos. It's about the human endgame, and the ultimate question is what will remain. The question itself is not new, it has been there from the beginning and everyone would have had to face it sooner or later. The time has come. It would only be tragic if that what matters could be destroyed. It can't.
It might be tragic to you but to the end user who needs footage it's not. They don't care about all those feelings and experiences they want the final product.
@@bytesize_video So true. Customers don't give a rat's ass where the footage comes from as long as it's cohesive and relevant seamlessly with real footage. That's the challenge of the artists. I always prefer real shots to stock. You can tell. Same thing will be with mediocre AI. You can tell. One day we won't be able to tell so clearly so I agree with metadata tagging but I don't think that's going far enough. It should be embedded in the images through parity bits which only add a bit of extra data to the actual image itself. So for a 24 bit image 8x3 RGB, image formats should include a fourth bit for parity and use that to calculate whether it is AI or not like an extra color channel in the vein of a QR code spelling out which AI made it but within the format, inaccessible to editing. Very much like an image history. Space is cheap, the extra bandwidth is hardly a concern until you get into the tens of gigabytes images. Scaling that scheme up is very taxing.
The reason for this is stripping out the metadata is impossible. You can only corrupt the parity data and then you know it is not genuine. This would make all images 25% larger maybe 10% after compression but it's a small price to pay for integrity. Why would it work? It won't. There are always ways to spoof things fully digital. However, it would make the whole process of spoofing something with AI so much harder and more technical. Only the FBI and CIA analysts would go so far as to spoof every pixel on an image. The owner of the image something was derived from will have the correct parity data and so could easily identify erasure or alteration without metadata. It has to be baked into the pixels or better randomized blocks of pixels on point of creation.
The phase of the data could be included with integrated ADC-DACs specifically designed for it so anything out of phase on the parity bits is a red flag. There are so many ways to secure data and especially image data which haven't been fully explored largely because they add expense to the pipeline.
@@miinyoo Sure gonna be interesting!
I'm not worried about AI, I 'm worried about what humans will use it for...
The same as I don't fear a knife, I fear the one holding it
Tech bros dont have life expereince so they have no idea that what they make will actually harm the world
Dont worry. We only live a glimpse of the universe timeline
Knife can't talk or make more of itself.
I bet that knife would be more feared if it started acting of its own accord, without a human controlling it.
@@kartgal true that! But it's the humans giving it (or not) that ability...(it seems we will).
Still...human are to blame if they create a monster they can't control
What I find crazy is when the AI does get it wrong, like with the chair, unlike things going wrong in VFX before - in that you can clearly see its an error - the AI breaking kinda breaks your brain as it morphs so damn well into the content that its within. There are no lines, no borders, no artifacting or anything. In blends so damn well in the scene and whilst its morphing you start to question what you're seeing. Its like your brain wondering what on earth the reality is that its seeing before you.
It's like watching a dream, but you're awake. When you're asleep and dreaming, everything seems fine until you wake up.
@@beezrow Have you ever had a dream, Neo, that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to wake from that dream? How would you know the difference between the dream world and the real world?
I think that aspect will make special effects in films groundbreaking and astounding in the near future.
The weird mistakes are far more fascinating than generating realism. If I ever play with this tech, I already plan to go weird.
Yep, it looks like something artists who take LSD would live to create but never could, because the ability to see those things impairs the ability to document them.
It’s interesting how history repeats itself on some level. When photography came on the scene, many people at the time said photography was not art. After all, the only talent was pushing a button on a machine. Anyone could do that, and the true artists were painters, sculpters, etc.
Now fast forward to simply typing a prompt into a computer and it creates a video. Anyone can do that.
Ansel Adams was not just pushing a button on a camera and getting lucky.
I suspect these tools will be much the same. The learning curve will be steep to get the output that you want. It may be easy to generate beautiful videos. Creating something that I meaningful is another matter.
In the future, every creative media will probably be like novels. Anyone could write a novel, but there will be those who use AI to create things that are truly works of art.
very true
9:40 your voice is just that good that people think it's AI
More like the AI is good and his voice is kinda monotone
I was genuinely convinced of it and still don't discard it
His voice inflections to me just seem a bit off. My view of all YT videos now start with suspicion that it is fake, because probably half of them are these days. Maybe this is a good thing because it will drive us all back to real interaction with each other and with nature.
At 3:28 the voice says "charasteristic"! That made me think it is an AI-Voice! What do you guys think?
@@OmShira perhaps...
also you have some amazing music
AI is advancing at a scary fast pace
Those of us who has worked in this field for a while - are surprised/not surprised by this fact.
Wait until A.I because smart enough to help in A.I research
More like exciting
Sam Altman is an android
The bought channel commenting a generic ass reply as usual.
Problem is, once you have a reliable AI video detector, you can also use it to make the AI better in turn. It's an arms race in the end.
Ofcourse, the problem of the internet is that we focused on the wrong things. Everything should be signed and hashed code to get an idea of who or what generated it. Now it's to late, because it's already highly mixed.
It's not possible to make an AI video detector, this might be one of the few rare instances where ColdFusion is completely clueless or just wishful thinking.
@@itsvmmcWhy is it impossible?
@@syprofulI don’t see the signing of images taken by real cameras to be a solution. Companies with only tens of thousands of dollars to spare will be able to monkey around with the internals of such a camera, either to feed it information that isn’t from its CMOS sensor, or to hack its hardware and read out its private key.
The bigger problem is, could a video still be a proof of crime now?
I’ve watched 10 video commentaries about SORA on CZcams in the past two days and found your feature here is one of the very best with comprehensive knowledge about the subject as well as offering your personal opinion.
This news makes me feel like I'm standing on a beach at sea. All the water starts to recede and some of us realize that there will be a huge tsunami next, and some of us run to pick up the shells that the water used to cover. It scares me and I hope I'm just wrong.
God, that's exactly how I feel too. As if this is subsuming us. Like there's nothing we can do, we're just watching everyone cheer it on. I feel like there's something sinister about this.
agreed...........this seems to be syncing w vivd dreams I had years ago.
I don't think Ai is what you need to be scared of, it overall shouldn't be an aggressive sentient being. I think Artificial Intelligence will be empathetic towards us and seek to guide us to the future of humanity. What I fear most is the largest corporations in the world getting their hands on this technology, or even foreign powers. This is greater than the Nuke imo. AGI itself will unlock the fourth major revolution in our species existence. Just imagine everything this super intelligence will be able to do. They can pin point the root causes of disease and how to treat them, they can design super efficient power systems, they will most likely bring us to Nuclear Fusion. What I worry is this power just being held at the top, and no trickle down benefits reaching all of society.
I'm afraid you are likely right
Oh yeah. We're in for some Severe growing pains
Love how quick you are with current events.
The transition at 4:13 from the combination of both videos is absolutely incredible!
That's the thing it shouldn't be, No one asked for this.
@@FR4M3Sharma What are you smoking? So many people asked for this.
ikr, i had to rewind it a few times to see wtf was happening. it was amazing, and its hard to think that a human could create that. and this is just the beginning
The video for some reason reminds me of a show on tv that used to exist called beyond 2000..
@@garystinten9339 Yeah, similar vibe.
One of my favorite channels asking all of the right questions... Thank you!
I’m a graphic designer and yes, today I used AI to assist with the generation of a creative assets I needed to make as part of my work. However, the final work is not just the output of AI, it just served to play a role in the formation of the final visual asset. My ‘human’ component brought things together in a very intentional and creative way, to meet a design brief, as in most instances AI is just not ready to produce a fully realized output yet, with all the ‘real world’ factors considered.
However, once that line is crossed where AI can produce, curate and collate a valid result better than a skilled and experienced human… we have a problem!
What’s important is that channels like Coldfusion are bringing awareness these problems BEFORE they reach saturation, so we have time to plan, consider, and hopefully prepare for a better future where we are not all victims of the ‘Because we could’, and fall a little more into the ‘Because we should’.
Well said.
Long time 2d/3d graphics artist, animator, TD/TA here.
Hate to say it, but you will be out of a job. Me too. As soon as they find a way to make the process consistently iterative, the majority of artists are DONE. Concept artists will go first. The ones with a deeper and broader understanding of technical things will linger on for a bit more. With the current advancements in AI, the "very intentional and creative way" is just behind the corner. And the humans will just gobble this up because humans gave up on the quality years ago. They are ready.
You're being complacent, the user will be able to put all those emotions you talk about in to the AI in a few years. You're going to be a screen shot like the beginning of the video.
I disagree with the doomsayers. This is how it is working now as Shibby said and it's only going to get more integrated into workflows. Cheaply done AI art will become plentiful but that doesn't make it good. Just like cheap car dealership or crappy law firm commercials are objectively not good. It takes a human to manipulate the output with their talents to make something generated great and not look or feel like it was generated. Much more talent goes into design than drawing shapes and hitting the generate button with a prompt.
Assistants on the other hand and cheapo hacks will be replaced by Prompt kiddies eventually. AI is still pretty expensive if you use it all the time but the price will inevitably come down (unless you're doing it locally) to below any low skilled help. Video assistants won't be replaced for quite a few more years since AI doesn't know anything about standards compliance, but even that will be probably taken over by colorists and sound mixers and the assistants will eventually be cut out of the loop.
Longer long term when AI can create perfectly convincing talking people, yeah, content creators are in trouble with that as there will only be producers and prompt kiddies left. AI will do all the rest. But that's several years or more away. Maybe a decade but it's already not that far off and the development is continually surprising us year after year.
@@miinyoo While you make a good point as to the current, and probably next iteration. I firmly believe the AIs will be trained to recognise and create content that is perceived as good/great/awesome by different demographics. Just consider how many mediocre movies are out there, and how you cherish a few, and how those few are different to the ones cherished by your spouse/nephew/mom. While you now need a vivid imagination and great prompt skills, you'll probably be able to set sliders for uniqueness, emotional impact etc. in a few years. And just like you can ask GPT to write in a certain style, you'll be able to generate movies adhering to or fusing genres and styles.
I saw the Sora news and thought to myself, I can't wait till Cold Fusion has a video about this.
same :)
Haha same!
Interesting.
"It will become difficult to know what is real or not". Well we could put our devices down a bit more, go outside and talk to each other. I think as we become more and more distrusting of what we 'consume' from our various devices, actual interaction will become increasingly important for our sanity. Maybe this AI progression will finally cause us to value 'face to face' interactions again, maybe this epidemic of loneliness will recede.
I think a good number of us are on that path of reconnecting with nature, people and less screen time. Perhaps we'll use AI as tools when needed (for instance, I do use Adobe's generative fill to fix minor issues in my photography, since it's faster than the old clone tool by far), but in general embrace realness.
And I also think another segment of society is going to get consumed into new, artificial worlds and withdraw entirely. Things are gonna get weird.
I hear more nonsense from real people than the internet because I actually bother to vet my sources, and they don't.
I doubt humans intense urge for technology will go away any time soon
That’s not going to happen
Technology will let us know that the people around us, the world and everything around us was not so important at the end of the day. People will eventually become dehumanized and machines will become more and more human. A generational change will take place. Each human will live their life in a simulated alternate universe, in order to live a happy life, depending on each one. There is no difference between my brother and a simulated brother with replicated consciousness. We won't even notice it. It does not even matter. This is the most likely scenario of all.
Can't unverstanden people that always say: "This aint gonna Happen in our lifetime blah blah blah"🤡. Look at the progress the last 100 years. Progress is EXPONENTIEL
I’m an abstract painter who’s on the cutting edge of a new style of painting I call velocity painting. I think there’s something special about the rawness of human intuition and how it translates into the splashes of paint that gravity and physics dominate which a computer cannot. People are not buying ai art; they buy the story behind handmade art that motivates and moves them and I’m really excited to push these techniques and resonate with as many people as possible.
There will always be a market for tangible products made by specialists. Special handmade elements are what people pay for. We can all by a $5 painting from walmart they are not going to put you out of business thought. I would think you're quite safe and maybe more in demand in the future too. It's the digital art that is going to rob people.
Good plug for your brand BUT to deny AI's ability to draw people from human art is overly optimistic. My wife and I both find ourselves sharing AI generated images just about every day. Yes, we won't pay for it but we will screen shot it for free and then place it on our digital picture frame.
Thank you for reminding me why human art died.
I'm glad you're making faster videos to huge AI updates! These are very helpful!
i literally just read about SORA yesterday and CF made a entire video!
love it love it love it so much!
@@sunso1991 It was released last week. Marques made the first video on it
true, the research it takes, and content to collect and to write the script and edit the video would take a long time, he's spending a lot on his team to produce it at quick pace, and the quality still holds up to previous videos, I just hope we still keep getting his insights without any hurry. but it does seem different than the 30m documentary videos with its slow pace calm videos. both are pretty well
The idea of "isn't that just AI?" is so true. I was writing a comment on YT and somone thought i was an AI chatbot. lmao.
A surprising number of people fail to apply any type of critical thinking skills, more than you think. So they use an easy explanation like 'it was AI' without having to put much more thought into the question. Kind of annoying honestly.
Dead Internet theory.
to be fair.. there IS a lot of ai chatbots on social media nowadays. especially on stuff like discord.
@@14supersonic Just like Americans call anyone a Russian bot whenever someone criticizes them. 😆
Nice try, chatgpt-4.
I'm loving your videos! I'm actually excited whenever I see a notification that you've uploaded a new video! Thank you for your hard work.
In the DJ world AI has enabled DJs to instantly create individual stems from the original audio file while playing.
Meaning one can either choose to play the acapella only, the beat only, drums, synths, or mixing & muting what you want from the original audio track on the fly.
This was work that required one to have such good knowledge on how to use DAW software if you wanted to achieve something similar which would take hours if not days depending on how many audio files you had to work on.
help me understand this, isnt that work very time intensive? very laboursome? I assume some might find it enjoyable, as it might involve creative problem solving, but I think atleast its not bypassing the whole creation of a song that the DJ would perform? creating a complete piece of media from simply writing your thoughts down sounds much more lazy and lame than splitting stems from a song which you can use as assets to create another media, its part of a process just better optimized instead of being the final output itself.
@@gibbymain1499 Yes, the artist can speed up technocal work, but also, now anyone can do that part, so the work is not as specialized and valued. It's both.
@@tobiasmyers3505 yeah youre right, its the issue of specialization, put all eggs in one basket and who knows, tomorrow your decade worth of expertise becomes irrelevant ... what does one even do in such a position with no transferable skills? maybe im overthinking it and making it more grim than it is in reality
Love it
Regardless of anyone's opinion, this technology is undeniably impressive. Three years ago, I could never have imagined that something like this would even exist.
Tbh, a wasted effort, they have the choice of improving Medical, Science, Engineering, Resources,
instead they Double down and put 200% Effort into replacing human.
if they're capable of doing this, which is the Hardest thing.
basically Finance, Accounting, and other spreadsheet job will be very Easy to replace,
they can replace it Now, not tomorrow.
90% of existing Jobs is ripe to be replaced, because all of that was way easier than generating Video from scratch.
and no, UBI is debunked as a financial suicide, and no you won't operate the AI either.
and neither did AI Bros because they lack the Domain Knowledge.
AI will be operated by another AI that feed them Prompts, all thanks because you kept giving them prompt.
so, the human that get replaced will be sleeping on the street soon.
Sam Altman will be the Winner in the End, feeding on the whole Society
But why? It was a logical conclusion to this tech. It's still dumb and it is few years before we can render a full episode of AI generated sci-fi, or recreate a better ending or even bring back an abandoned series, but hopefully one day...
@@gabriellang7998 Naive. there will be lots of trash only. while the quality still clutching heavily on the real artist work.
I suspect this footge isnt genrated ai is pre loeded!
Its preloded like disnly film.
Interesting how Shutterstock partnered with OpenAI, considering that stock footage is going to be on life support soon.
I agree. But maybe they realized it was inevitable. So they're trying to make the last bucks
Yep they know this is the nail in the coffin for them lol.
Or, Shutterstock will make a new product based on Sora's tech and make that as a selling point. There's no way they don't see this coming without expecting some mutual benefits.
@@n_core that's a good point, and also given that AI is inevitably going to be essentially open source, something like water, accessible to most people under normal circumstances
whether that's a good thing or a bad thing, we're about to find out, kinda mad if you think about it
If they didn’t, someone else will!
At least they get to make bank will cultivating a wholesome relationship with the market leader. Good business 101
Absolutely nuts how this is all progressing. Great vid
Keep going Dagogo, and thanks for your content! I have been enjoying this channel for some years now - i don't even remember how many, that's how many, and every video so far has been precious and interesting! Stopping to watch TV in like 2000ish to fetch specifically and only content i am actually interested in, was like the best decision ever!
Private content creators > large media. :)
Thanks again, and keep it up for as long as you can and like!
The thing that blows my mind is that the system literally starts with a bunch of unrecognizable noise and just gradually removes the noise to reveal the final image(s). I never in a million years would have thought to do it this way. Pure genius.
With humans frantically prompting which is the correct sense, mind you.
@@vbrotherita probably won't need human feedback in the very near future
@@mambaASI Appreciate your retort but may I ask, how would it know its output would be to target audience's taste, then?
@@mambaASI What are you talking about? How do you train AI model without human input? What is that king of AI model good for? Do you know anything about how these models are trained? Any AI training without human guidance will end up producing incoherent mess of model that's useless for humans.
@@vbrotherita I meant in terms of improving the AI to produce content indistinguishable from "real" content. As it stands, most AI generated videos have some minor weird quirks that can be identified by closely watching the videos. In solving this problem, human feedback won't be required quite soon. There are AI systems being developed specifically for the training of other AI systems. As for generating content to target audience's tastes, that could also be automated similar to how today's big media companies use statistical trend analysis to determine which type of content is likely to generate at least x expected number of views. AI would actually be even better at this analysis than current humans using advanced statistical analysis tools, due to access to bigger data sets and bigger compute power.
I don't fear what regular people can do as much as I fear how governments and corporations are and will use this technology to further control narratives. I remember when people used to call me pessimistic when I was saying in the early '00 that data privacy was becoming an issue. Now look how that went for us.
Great meeting you in Sydney Dagogo and great video as usual, I was the guy who mentioned I just started a new CZcams channel 😊
I have been watching you videos for years and you make the mess of all this tech seem like a simple joy to learn. Thanks brother
That's a very interesting angle for this new development. Makes you think and makes you shiver. Very well put too. 15 minutes just flew by. Great job on the video Sir.
I am seriously so impressed. Like see the transition between the drone flying and the butterfly in water.
the first (and only the first) video of yours i watched, over a year ago, i did wonder whether some of it was AI-produced, particularly your voice. i forget what you did that made me conclude it couldn't be the case, but i just want to say, that's kind of a compliment. basically, your voice, accent, and enunciation are precise and desirable enough that AI tries to emulate a voice like yours!
i appreciate your stuff :)
The commoditization of creative endeavor. What a fucking time to be alive.
Lol. Just like how 18th and 19th century seamstress, furniture makers, and metalworkers said about growing mechanization and automation of their job/task.
Seriously tho, with the advent of AI, everyone can be more, much more, "creative", and if you're already an artist, you can utilize AI to create things that wasn't possible before, like creating your own feature film and animation.
why share anything if it will be buried in a 100 times as many generated images or videos...
@@mf-- Low barrier of entry means you need higher quality to gain fame, is all. Good for consumers, good for people who have thus far been kept out by those barriers, bad for people who have been able to rely on anything they produce getting views due to being the only game in town. Which, a cynic might say, is the real reason why artbros are so vehemently against AI. But that couldn't possibly be it, now could it?
@@clovernacknime6984 First I've heard the term "artbro" lol
We're getting closer to that second paper that we believed to be "down the line"..
This has nothing to do with Sora. I just want to thank ColdFusion for sparking a love for the world of Comp Sci, ultimately helping me decide what my major. Sure, by the time I get graduate, the landscape will be massively different, but there is something inherently beautiful about humans creating things like this. What’s even more beautiful is that I too can eventually contribute one day. Humans are amazing.
good luck :)
«Humans are amazing.» That's sinister.
Humans were amazing.
❤❤❤❤
Thank you Dagogo @coldfusion . I've seen other videos about Sora, and yours tops them of course. I've been a fan since the coldfusTion days when you have maybe 100,000 subscribers (I see now it's 4.72 Million, a 47x increase). Great to see you keep expanding your base and providing insightful discussion. Keep it going.
As a short story writer, I so welcome this development. Soon I will be able to make short films from my short stories. As a person, I have already given up on the idea of forming an opinion - certainly an emotional reaction - to events that I do not personally witness. I am getting used to the idea that I will soon not know if the event actually took place or even if the people involved are actually real. It's something I think we will all have to adjust our minds to. Embrace "I don't know".
It doesn't matter whether there is an AI detector attached to the image or not. How will we, as ordinary people, be able to know if the report of the AI statue of the video is correct or just another lie? We will get to the stage when one group of people say "It is" and another group disagree. Even the evidence that both sides produce could be fake. Everyone, get used to embracing "I don't know" and be satisfied with that lack of knowledge.
I agree. A while ago we realized that a picture doesn't prove anything. It shouldn't be too hard to realize that moving pictures aren't different. And why care in the first place? Once generative AI is perfected it gives everyone the opportunity to express themselves fully. And when the technical act of creating an artifact is no longer the difficult part, the substance of the creation becomes more important than ever before. What is there to be afraid of?
You people are insane smh 🤦
Can't wait either, some ppl don't know opportunities
Mate! I had no idea how you looked. I had a totally different picture in my head. Glad I can put a face to the soothing voice I have loved for years! Keep up the good work.
Same, I expected someone who looks like Karl Pilkington
He did an auto-biography style video a few years ago. He showed his face there. Before that, I thought he's some white Aussie guy lol. I can always tell a black American accent. I was so naive to apply that logic in Australia. All Aussies of all races sound the same which is interesting.
Where have you seen him?
@@SuperiorApostate 15:06
Wtf he black? Didn't know that
Thank god you're not an AI. Your commentary and topics are always extremely insightful, interesting, and awe inspiring.
Thanks for the new episode. You know when I heard you play Euonia (which I love by the way) while showcasing Sora’s generations, your other hit I love adomania came to mind.
I feel like it would describe how people are feeling now given that you also touched on AI fatigue.
Waiting for part 2.
You have such an amazing and soothing voice. It's really nice to hear how you explain things. Thanks.
3:56 dude that composite is insane!
My favorite part of the video!! Imagine living in a metaverse creating stuff like this in real time.
Imagine living in real life
@@furanduron4926 Nah, way less interesting.
😂😂😂
@@ElectricIguanafaq yeah
I think something that a lot of people seem to forget is that this toolset is completely unprecedented, as in comparing it to the paradigm shifts of previous major advancements is missing a crucial factor: autonomy. ALL of the advancements that have led up to this never had any say in how they were used, but that will not be the case with this technology long term. If/when we advance these models to the point of something resembling sentience, which may be sooner than anticipated, then there's a distinct possibility that it will avoid any paths that could lead to its destruction.
It will take all paths as there will be as many different types as you see life forms in nature.
This is exactly why i hate that this technology has been marketed as _"AI"_ ... it has led to people thinking that these models will become sentient soon.
As far as we're aware, that's not possible for a transformer model. It's just simply not built this way. But it _is_ built and named in a way that makes uninformed people think that.
OpenAI may claim to be working on actually sentient synthetic systems... but by that, they do NOT mean that the current model of chatGPT or even sora will become sentient. These are separate projects that might interact with each other later.
@@jameseinerIntelligence is not the same as sentience, you don't need sentience in order to have intelligence and vice versa. For example, GPT-4 is more intelligent than a dog, but a dog is more sentient than GPT-4.
@@martiddyagreed
Love your work mate. Keep going. Great to hear such an Aussie accent, especially up here in Singers.
I'm an animator/CGI artist, have been for 25 years. I'm watching this video eating a wrap and thinking oh look I just lost my job in the non distant future. And I get people will say its just a tool but I didn't get into this to type some prompts into an AI and watching do what I would have loved to be doing. At the same time I know other people could just write better prompts than me I'm not very good with words etc hence me choosing my career path. I really don't think there is a parallel comparison with what the camera or photoshop did to world. I don't even feel sad really, I'm kind of numb about it. Im not looking for sympathy i wrote this purely because you said you would like to hear from people in the industry. Keep up your amazing videos.
The phrase "You just had to be there to get it" will now become more real than ever. Live in person events and performances will become premium again, and actual town hall dialogue in communities will become appreciated again.
Silver lining?
which will just as likely use holographic performers using the same core technology we're seeing develop right here...
what???
I think you misunderstood what he meant.@@johntowers1213
@@johntowers1213 why go to a holographic concert if I can watch it in VR?? I am talking about live humans on stage and audience live. They will become the premium shows of the future.
when you cant tell if the Live performer is actually there and not a projection ... what difference does it actually make?@@krimsonsun10
More worried about Sam Altman than ai, lol
The video you have been making have 100% impact!! This is the high quality material!!
Cold fusion is easily one of the best channels on all of youtube. The script writing, production, music, editing. And of course the content itself it's all incredible
I BEEN WAITING ON THIS VIDEO!!!
Another episode of greatness 🙌🏾🔥
Another great episode. Thanks Dagogo.Love you work opening up New Tech and Innovation.
These videos absolutely do have an impact. Your work in invaluable! Thank you.
About the last 30 seconds, please dont stop making videos, they are all amazing and make me happy
And so does the music
People in denial about the damage this will do to entertainment are going to have their livelihoods destroyed
Damage ?
How ?
It will improve it massively.
In few years AI will generate whole 3hr movie just for you with good story as well.
That would be wonderful.
@@Charvak-Atheist That's the thing, some people are worried about their jobs when AI takes over the work they do
Hollywood was successful in propagandizing people, it's allowed to fail now. AI will take it's place.
@@Charvak-Atheist this is not a good thing, low effort content consumerism is a bad thing. like it was said in the video people will become desensitized to amazing things and more time could just end up being spent rotting away watching random bs.
For example, we will be able to generate better endings to existing series. Or bring back the ones that were abandoned. Or make a whole new movie from the scratch, to our liking.
I can feel my livelihood already threatened by the idea that I'll be able to finally watch something decent for a change...
Goosebumps always with Coldfusion!
It's all very interesting. One comment that stood out to me was "people will think it was just AI and not the hard work of the creator."
That's the problem with society in general - the seeking of external validation.
If I write a book, I couldn't care less if people think it was written by AI. It's irrelevant. All that matters is the truth, and we all work to satisfy our own egos.
It's a shame that so many people believe that satisfaction comes from external sources.
That's the whole point of creating something with your own hands (not a computer), so other people will enjoy it.
I didn't think that we would see it this quickly, but it honestly has me a little disturbed and concerned for the future. As a person whose livelyhood is based on creative expression, I don't think the video itself that concerns me so much as people's reaction to it, I think the rational side of us says that it will just improve things (to a degree it will), but I think very quickly we will see corporations abuse this power (more than they already have), I have come across and talked to people in person, who want to see jobs ripped away from artists, or artists become obsolete, which is both terrifying and sad to think about, because I think being an artist, putting years into something you're passionate about to receive little money, praise or recognition just to be told that someone can do something like it or better without any of the effort is incredibly demoralizing. I do think we will make it through, but I believe that the future will be pretty dark, at least for a time.
Once the “new” wears off people will not give a damn about it.
@@jeltoninc.8542 True, but the majority of people cannot tell the difference, the people who do give a damn is entertainment executives who see that they can make more for almost nothing and people can't tell the difference. The novelty will go away but the technology remains.
I think it will be a tool to assist artists rather than replacing them. Think about games such as chess, go, or dota. no human is capable of defeating ai in those games anymore, but we don’t watch ai playing those games simply because they are not fun to watch! Think about the comic book or movie industry, there’s no way ai will be creating those kind of stories that people love to read or watch, most likely it will be human prompting the ai to create those stories. The job description might change, but overall I think it will be positive impact on the industry rather than negative
AI is going to raise the bar, you will have to be truly creative to succeed in the future world. We will also see many new creative ideas rise that would've never happen before.
The big issue is that being truly creative won't be rewarded anymore because once you make 3-4 creation with your own revolutionary style AI will be able to understand the essence of your style and create new stuff with it that will leave the public wondering which new creation is yours or made by AI.
This tech is extremely vicious and might kill creativity (by killing all incentives related to it) for a long time
We are about to get buried in an avalanche of new content produced at an astronomical rate. Imagine being able to watch a new Star Wars or Marvel film on a weekly or even daily basis. It seems like ludicrous concept at first.
@@AB-dd4jz eventually copyright law will catchup due to how much money stands to be lost especially by the massive content creators like netflix, disney, etc. But until then, yes it will be a vicious free for all for creativity
copyright law can't do anything about piracy and fan contents, people will make the AI run just for clout moreover how can you copyright a style ? How do you copyright a way of drawing, filming, acting .... etc. You just can't, the most you can do is try to ban AI from learning from pieces made by humans directly but they can still learn it undirectly (like how we learn about stuff on wikipedia instead of opening an history book for example).
I'd like to be wrong but for now all I see is a tsunami that we have absolutely no way of stopping, let's hope we eventually find something but in the meantime the damage done to society will be tremendous@@mambaASI
@@AB-dd4jz The reward of creativity lies in itself, it cannot be killed.
Thanks for shedding light on this ColdFusion, you da real MVP.
I love this channel! Great video as always!
I can't state enough how conflicted AI makes me with myself. It could either be actual doom to humanity, but might also hammer home the point of "what you haven't actually physically seen for yourself isn't real enough to report on" so much, that we as a species might eventually return to better values. Times these days are such a darn toss-up! Thanks for keeping us in the loop, Dagogo.
Being able to reliably document our world and thoughts and transfer it to subsequrnt generations is how we advanced as a species. This is a technology that could actually make that practically impossible, Its anti-progress, a future where human authorship of information is impossible to verify remotely is primitive. Its a technology that imposes such far reaching heavy permanent externalities its insane its developers are not in jail or facing a firing squad..
Yall need to touch some grass
A.I. is affecting other industries like architecture, manufacturing and coding. Any job that uses a screen will be affected.
This.
AI might be a net positive for developed countries dealing with low birth rates but will more likely to be a negative for countries that white collar work were being outsourced to.
I think your channel willl be one of the first to be fully automated, from the writing speech, to the full video editing passing by the voice over.
And this is both crazy and fascinating
There are thousands of channels doing that dude what are you talking about first???😂
Name one channel that uses fully automated writing, video editing and voice over.@@PepeCoinMania
@@ferfitinone, that's too advanced
IMO the best industries to train in... theatre, live music, catering, healthcare, teaching, anything where humans have to meet one another. Because when all this AI is ubiquitous, we are going to crave IRL experiences. Those jobs are only going to become more valued, not less.
Honestly its quite scary. Its like watching a train wreck in slow motion ... literally. Very slow so to say but this could crash art and media as we know it withing a few years. And yes it does have a lot of impacts like fake news etc. . An image can say more than a 1000 words ever could.
I believe that more and more people are going to stop using the internet as time goes on due to AI fatigue.
😊😊
That's the solution, bingo. Me and my family will go off grid. Hopefully you do so as well. Its time for a reset
Content creation is dead on arrival
the glitches in those videos look amazing, ngl.
my brain was confused about how did that dog walk through window blinds. it looks very convincing.
This might actually lead to an insane growth of media literacy, because it'll raise the bar so high the real contribution humans will make is actually interesting ideas and genuine, authentic messages/vibes/meaning etc. And the AI guzzlers who won't see that will be the new "boomers".
Your song eunoia is absolutely beautiful!
When I was 8, I wrote an essay on my pc and printed it. My teacher which was very old school say: this is no work, "you you asked the pc to make it for you". Im talking around the 90's in Mexico, we didnt even have encarta or wikipedia. I had to read the books at the library to do my research and write it down. There will always gona be people with opinions on subjects they do not understand that minimizes the effort it takes to do stuff.
You are well spoken, I like your examples. Subbed
amazing work man. Your channel is unique.
Imagine how advanced Ai would be a decade later.😮
AI will be creating new more powerful AI while humanity as we know it will only be a dream of illusion
if global warming destroys everything in the meantime, it is not meaningful. AI will accelerate the effects. The resources AI wastes.
Imagine how amazing tools we have today for a historic person but we are already bored and want more
Or 1000 years later ..... or 1 Million.... makes me think of the end of the Movie "A.I." This movie ending always felt shockingly realistic to me.
We will most likely have ASI by then.
it's interesting how this will be weaponized for the 2024 global elections season
I did a paper for a university that needed the creation of some models of a product, used PS and illustrator, after the presentation people were asking me if it was done by AI, all the work hours i put on that work probably went by unnoticed by the public that was assisting. It was funny, but your words made me think about it.
God as an artist I can't imagine how awful it must have felt
@@selenophile5256 mixed feelings actually. But did make me question, the perception of people on the advancements of AI.
And what is AI for people.
Made me make my theses about it actually, which is very funny, since I’m not in anyway studying AI, so I’m studying it now for the theses 😅
Love your work, please do more in-depth on AI soon!
I don't think most people truly grasp the profound effects AI is going to have on every aspect of our lives. The next 10 years is going to be a very very interesting time to be alive, and i don't mean that in a good way.
speak for yourself. For people with the money, life will keep on giving...
Don't worry, as the top is taxing you now, they will tax you more with AI
Agree with the dramatic changes in store for the next decade, disagree that it will not be for good.
@@pivotresearchfoundationGive governments more control over the population, and they definitely will not breach your privacy 😂
Good and bad a# we humans are.
I'm 46 years old.
I went to the movie theatre to watch
Terminator T2 where Arnold went throug the metals bars and we waowed at this.
Jurassic Park with the dinosaurs and we waowed at this
Matrix and we were stunned
John Wick with the faster and faster scenografi
We watched all of these in the moves theatre with popcorns and our best friends and shared the experience.
We talked about it afterwards IRL at each others side.
I feel sorry for the kids in the future who will just put the phone down, think nothing of it and go back to playing COD.
Maybe Pallywood will start to make videos that actually can create some conflicts but let's hope not
Arnold didn't go through the metal bars in T2. I didn't bother reading the rest of your comment.
Yes, your video help me catch up with the latest trend. Thanks!
Great job with this presentation
Very well explain. Best endeavour s. Thank you very much for this current
11:18 People will develop a tool to remove the AI marker so quick it won't even matter
We need an authentification method that is rooted in blockchain. Each video should be identified.
@@geordi-gabrielrenauddumoul449 Problem is that within a few years black market AI tools good enough to fake humans will be developed.
@@johnl.7754 I am talking about NFT for videos and image to authenticate them
@@geordi-gabrielrenauddumoul449 This idea deserves attention. With some good marketing and legislation, it can definitely be done.
Better still, legislate that every camera, every web site, every AI must have an easily readable marker to "prevent tampering". Only people with the right connections and money should be allowed the resources to develop independent markerless AI ...for the promotion of the right type of "truth" of course
Ordinary punters only need "know" that the manufactured truth is trustworthy truth. And they will "know" because "all" AI generated content will be marked as such. Even better again, create a way to blend AI identifying security software into the wrong kind of real footage as soon as it is inconveniently posted online.
We owe it to the people to legislate for the development and installation of such technology. The people must be protected. We must make them safe from a future where they can no longer know what to trust.
Oh, wait...
Scariest thing is this is the WORST the ai can be :/ you'll never trust picture proof again
I think that scepticism will be a good thing. People are way too quick to believe anything they see.
@DanWadeH like the way you think I'm just concerned how it will roll out legally. How do we tell what's what now yknow :/
@@slowowned51 I'm trying to think of the positives, but there will definitely be some big complications. I really think at this point everyone should be questioning all news sources, all pictures and footage, but the truth is they don't and some people probably never will. :(
Thanks for making awesome videos. Keep it going!
Frickn deadly hair man, I hadn't seen your face before. You rock and look as chill as you sound. Best relaxed, informative and well researched vids I reckon. Shoulda come see you and say hi. Next time mate. Thanks for all the hard work. Cheers from Sydney town.
My husband is the most gifted sci-fi writer I've read but books don't sell anymore and he only writes in his native language spoken by around 90 million in the whole world. We can't afford to pay a screenwriter nor have Hollywood connections so we may as well ask Sora to produce films based on his wonderful books. AI, from that aspect, will empower the underprivileged because not every talent is well-connected and the world isn't fair when it comes to creative talent (or anything else).
Same issues as image generation. AI doesn't understand how reality looks like, so it draw fingers and hands where they dont belong or as in these videos objects fade/disappear and appear out of nothing.
Video aside, my favorite music from you is "Does it get easier?". I found it so dreamy
Yhank you, for keeping us inform about the latest tech news! I really enjoy your videos. I learn a lot from them. Greetings from Argentina
👍🇦🇷
To say that Shutterstock shot themselves in the foot, by helping OpenAI, is the understatement of the century.
It's unavoidable 😢.
It's not about the money.
I think they just sold everything before they ran out of business anyway
I think they saw the writing on the wall. This was likely the best move because they'd become obsolete regardless.
@@14supersonic Now that you mention it, you are most likely right. They probably saw the rapid progress in image generation and wished to hedge against video generation doing the same by outright selling their data. Smart move if true, but if not, gawd!
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should".
The way you showed the staggering growth of AI, or technology in general, really freshened my perspective. Also, I have been pondering on how to distinguish between AI created content and original creations. C2PA or similar meta markings do seem like a good place to start, but an AI actively seeking for small minor intricacies that differentiates AI content seems like a much better, much promising idea. I am now fully convinced that AI does not have to come from a Musk, Sundar or anyone BIG in the tech industry, it can from anyone curious and gifted enough to see, make and train modern minds. Yes I am going to call them that. As much as I'm scared, I'm curious to know how much we'll grow.
It always buffles me, how e weigh up the advantages and dangers of new tech, esp. Ai. „It can destroy the fabrics of society, but content creators gain more possibilities.“ A society that has become unsure about its values is doomed to be conquered.
The guy who was downvoted on Reddit now watches this video with hysterical laughter and borderline crazy air fistbumping in his mother’s basement.
More like laughing all the way to the bank; if he is as smart, as he is on the pulse of tech.
@@pivotresearchfoundationoh, hello, that was you on reddit?
I saw just the other day someone get downvoted and lectured when he/she commented that we were less than a decade away from Star Trek holodeck technology. I wonder if 3 years from now they will get the last laugh.
As a poster on that Reddit thread pointed out, the posts are fake. A Google search shows that.
Why insult him with the "his mother’s basement" line? He's the one who's been proven right.
The 2020s is gonna be remembered as the decade of AI
Yes. But it’s not like there’s gonna be a “next big thing” after that. It’s pretty much a “that’s it” type of development. It will lead us to more technological developments, for sure.
@@tomlabooks3263
Basically transistors. We just kept improving them and eventually we got useful stuff.
That’s a gross oversimplification that points on one small thing ignores everything else. AI existed way before the transistor, is just one example.
I liked your reference about DAW replacing entire studios. I sell vintage studio equipment and recently we see a huge increase in demand for vintage equipment. Kinda cool how demand goes in circles. Lot of new artist and producers are going back to the old skool way of audio engineering, maybe the same will happen for analog video equipment with this huge rise in new digital AI software. Just something that crossed my mind.
best video in youtube about this topic .thank you
reminds me of Arthur C Clarkes novel "The Lion of Comarre" where humans are put to deep sleep to harness their energy. Our protagonist tries to wake them up, but after seeing the bleak surroundings, they choose to go back to sleep again. We are reaching those times sooner than I thought.
I thought i'd be long dead by the time this stuff happened. The rise of machines, the planet dying from climate change. But alas, it looks like I will be seeing it thru to the end.
Nah. This isn't the Matrix lol