MARY POPPINS RETURNS vs Mary Poppins (1964)
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 07. 2024
- Does Emily Blunt & Disney's Mary Poppins Returns live up to Julie Andrew's original 1964 Mary Poppins movie? Here's all the new songs, characters and easter eggs in the Mary Poppins sequel compared!
6 Ways Mary Poppins Returns Ignored Mary Poppins (1964) ► • 6 Ways Mary Poppins Re...
Mary Poppins Returns Easter Eggs & Things You Missed ► • Everything YOU MISSED ...
Subscribe for more! ► bit.ly/FlicksSubscribe
Connect with Jan on Twitter ► / jan_gilbert
RELATED VIDEOS
--------------
Mary Poppins Returns Behind The Scenes Movie B-Roll & Bloopers ► • Behind The Scenes on M...
Bohemian Rhapsody vs Queen's True Story ► • 6 Ways Bohemian Rhapso...
Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again vs Mamma Mia ► • Mamma Mia vs MAMMA MIA...
PLAYLISTS YOU MIGHT LIKE
------------------------
Movie & TV Comparisons ► bit.ly/MovieComparisons
Ending & Post Credits Scenes Explained ► bit.ly/MovieEndingsPostCredits...
Easter Eggs ► bit.ly/EasterEggVideos
Movie Deleted Scenes & Rejected Concepts ► bit.ly/MovieDeletedScenes
Movie & TV Theories ► bit.ly/FilmTVTheory
Plot Holes & Movie Mistakes Explained ► bit.ly/MoviePlotHolesMistakes
Amazing Movie & TV Facts ► bit.ly/ThingsYouDidntKnowVideos
Marvel ► bit.ly/MarvelVideos
Fox Marvel Movies ► bit.ly/FoxMarvelVideos
DC ► bit.ly/DCVideos
Disney Animation ► bit.ly/DisneyAnimationVideos
Pixar ► bit.ly/PixarVideos
Star Wars ► bit.ly/StarWarsVids
Game of Thrones ► bit.ly/GameOfThronesVideos
SOCIAL MEDIA & WEBSITE
----------------------
Twitter ► / flickscity
Facebook ► / flicksandthecity
Google+ ► google.com/+FlicksAndTheCity
Website ► FlicksAndTheCity.com
Featured on flicksandthecity.com/mary-popp...
DISCLAIMER: Any audio-visual content and images used belong to the respective copyright holder and are used under fair use rules for the purpose of criticism and review.
"Sunrise" music by Nicolai Heidlas from HookSounds.com used under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license creativecommons.org/licenses/...
In Disney’s Mary Poppins Returns, an all-new original musical and sequel, Mary Poppins is back to help the next generation of the Banks family find the joy and wonder missing in their lives following a personal loss. Emily Blunt (“A Quiet Place,” “The Girl on the Train”) stars as the practically-perfect nanny with unique magical skills who can turn any ordinary task into an unforgettable, fantastic adventure and Lin-Manuel Miranda (“Hamilton,” “Moana”) plays her friend Jack, an optimistic street lamplighter who helps bring light-and life-to the streets of London.
Mary Poppins Returns is directed by Rob Marshall (“Into the Woods,” “Chicago”). The screenplay is by David Magee (“Life of Pi”) and the screen story is by Magee & Rob Marshall & John DeLuca (“Into the Woods”) based upon the Mary Poppins Stories by PL Travers. The producers are John DeLuca, p.g.a., Rob Marshall, p.g.a. and Marc Platt, p.g.a. (“La La Land”) with Callum McDougall serving as executive producer. The music score is by Marc Shaiman (“Hairspray”) and the film features all new original songs with music by Shaiman and lyrics by Scott Wittman (“Smash”) and Shaiman. The film also stars Ben Whishaw (“Spectre”) as Michael Banks; Emily Mortimer (“Hugo”) as Jane Banks; Julie Walters (“Harry Potter” films) as the Banks’ housekeeper Ellen; Pixie Davies, Nathanael Saleh and introducing Joel Dawson as the Banks’ children, with Colin Firth (“The King’s Speech”) as Fidelity Fiduciary Bank’s William Weatherall Wilkins; and Meryl Streep (“Florence Foster Jenkins”) as Mary’s eccentric cousin, Topsy. Angela Lansbury appears as the Balloon Lady, a treasured character from the PL Travers books and Dick Van Dyke is Mr. Dawes, Jr., the retired chairman of the bank now run by Firth’s character.
#MaryPoppinsReturns #MaryPoppins #Disney - Krátké a kreslené filmy
Mary Poppins Returns, y'all! 😀
*Watch ALL NEW Mary Poppins Returns videos here!* ► czcams.com/play/PLi8DA5V4mmme10QBLNTlG58R9iJ5oBoZJ.html
Tough call, can anyone be better than Julie Andrews?!
BOTH!
Julie Andrews
Emily Blunt does a fine job but NO ONE will ever be able to touch Julie Andrews performance.
Have not heard the new songs. But each one from 1964 makes friends, family and kids sing along. Feed the Birds makes me cry in a good way,. Jolly Holiday, Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious and Spoonful of sugar are just amazing
My mom took me to see Mary Poppins in 1964. I was 10 and mom was 34. I took my mom to see Mary Poppins Returns. She is 88 and I am 64. We had a very happy but emotional day , recalling all the years that have passed by. I am so glad we had the chance to see both movies together. Both movies are beautiful and so unforgettable.
@Debra Brown
what a nice story.
So sweet!!
You are so lucky
Wow, I love your story! That’s a beautiful bond you share with your mom.
My mum took me to see the original when I was 5 My daughter has just taken me and my granddaughter to see the new film. I was worried I wouldn't like it as I'm a huge Julie Andrews fan, but I loved it. It made me quite emotional. And when Angela makes an appearance that was the icing on the cake.
when there s a cake, there s a teapot nearby !
Julie Andrews is unbeatable
And so are her breasts.
You know, I would have loved a cameo Of Julie Andrews - perhaps at the end, on a cloud somewhere, where they both land, (Julie's and Emily's) the original and the new, great each other with: " Hello Mary" (Julie) - "Mary" (Emily) - with both then looking at the camera saying - "We never explain anything." A coven of Marys flying through the sky helping children in need.
Course, I'm sure this couldn't be done, breaks with the books to be sure.
You are so clever that's a really good idea! that would have been a really good way to do that.
I would have loved the cameo being the reflection of Julie Andrews’ Mary Poppins on the balloon at the end when Emily Blunt’s Mary sees herself.
Emily Blunt does the best job in stepping into Julie Andrews place. Moreover, she renews the character of Mary Poppins. Quite an accomplishment. Congratulations!
I have loved Mary Poppins for my entire life. The Mary Poppins returns movie is tear-jerking and incredibly sweet. I was brought to tears 3 times, Where the lost things go and its reprise, and the conversation. Were it not for Topsy-Turvy and Trip a little light fantastic, I would have left very sad. I left in love with this movie as much as the original!
same!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Same here too
THANK YOU GUYS, all of you
I m glad to be back among you english speaking people, even those who didn t like the film (I liked it but I respect you guys) because we can discuss it as respectful adults, NO INSULTS and no spelling mistakes
I went to watch the trailer in other languages just to read the comments (some won t like my answers and I expect insults in my mail box soon)
you should see what they write in italian and others and especially FRENCH and how they still despise everything disney (and hate uncle walt) even nowadays when all the bad rumors have been proven wrong
@@ginauccelatore3002 I agree with everything on the video here. I was absolutely delighted by how much I loved the film. Mary Poppins was released when I was a child, so I have sweet, sweet memories of our whole family seeing it together. I thought there would be no way I'd be just as touched by MP Returns, but I was!
wendy I love your first name ! and arrington like pollyanna harrington
when I met artist brian froud who did the preliminary paintings for dark crystal and labyrinth at a convention, his wife wendy froud was there and nobody paid much attention to her even though she designed all the puppets
I got up and asked HER a question "were you named after wendy in peter pan"
she said yes and she grew up thinking she was THE wendy and believed in fairies and ended up making them as puppets
later that day, waiting in line for their autograph, two french girls behind me, probably jealous I could speak english and discuss with them, noticed my disney bag and clothes and started to make anti disney remarks "laburinth, now that was a good movie, unlike all that crap from disney" loud enough so I could hear
so I asked them "how is your son toby froud" (who played the baby in labyrinth)
they said "he s not here with us because he s in new york working on all the giant puppets for the lion king broadway show"
so there ! you can like apples and oranges, same family! no doubt they re mary poppins fans
Emily blunt is good, but nothing beats the original...
Agreed
*deadpool smh*
I agree, but not because of Emily Blunt. I thought she was one of the great things about the movie. The script and the songs on the other hand. Ugh. I knew exactly where the certificate was the moment we saw it on screen and was just waiting the entire movie for the father to finally find it. Also, my toddler got bored at around the Topsy scene so it was even harder to stay engaged in the tired plot line. lol
I saw it with a friend and her three children, a toddler (who applauded at times!), a pre teen '(my star wars friend who helps me with the new toys because I have no patience with legos and never was into it before) and a teenager pretending to be bored but actually liked it
it was a premiere show with special activities like decorate your own kite (and keep it), have your picture taken with the original mary and bert (really cinema clerks) and received commemorative buttons, and balloons we all had a lot of fun
then I went to see it again alone and that s when I cried and cried
two very different experiences
like star wars, it was great to pass it on to a new generation accepting to turn off their I pods to watch a movie and be as thrilled as I was in 1964
Very well said
I watched the original Mary Poppins just a few days ago, just so I wasn't confused on what was going on. For me, nothing can compare to the original, but Mary Poppins Returns definitely was amazing.
Jeremy Stone lol what drugs are you on ?
@@Teddy-iv2sc what attitude you learn from school 🥺🥺
Have seen the new Mary Poppins and yes Emily Blunt is very good. Quite different to Julie Andrews but a very enjoyable movie
Good to hear you enjoyed it! Yes, really rather different but still enjoyable, as you say. :-)
as a christian ,I love the spirituallity in it, from the moving lullaby to the balloons taking you UP and even michael's song "the conversation"
being one of the sadly numerous movie goers who have recently lost a loved one, the film really helped me deal with it and released the tears locked inside
did a much better job at it than the otherwise excellent "nutcracker and the four realms"
which shows it from a different angle so you can t really compare
welcome instrumental cameos from the shermans
two generations of wonderful composers meet and complete each other
thank you for the picture of carrie fisher as mary poppins, she would love that ! (she liked my alice outffit at the comicon)
may the (God's) force be with you everybody
Maty poppins 2018 all the actors were perfect
all from elderly (but not old!) angela lansbury and dick van dyke to little georgie in a movie for the first time
👍
What a breath of fresh air. Not only was this film rejuvenating, but the nostalgia was absolute. I will watch this again, and again. A lot of life lessons to be learned. Perfect for the new generations, and those to come.
I wonder when _Mary Poppins Forever_ or _Mary Poppins Begins_ arrives in theaters?
2073 and 2128
"Mary Poppins Forever" gave me chills
Life-Row-Toll Groan..
What about the Mary Poppins/Nanny McPhee crossover?
@@Keznen bruh nanny Mcfee hit different
I absolutely loved it. I went and saw it this past Sunday with my dad and my grandma. We had an absolute blast. The Easter eggs were through the roof.
Thank you for creating your video comparisons.
I have lived by Mary Poppins rules (and sing every song front to back) my whole life and was thrilled to get another cinematic taste that not only honored the first movie, but made Mary more like P.L. Travers had written her...more sternly. I can imagine yet another movie with yet another actress playing her for another generation...continually making her life lessons relevant to multiple generations. If you think about it, every reader pictures the author's story in their own heads as they read, and multiple Mary's helps her never age. Love the first, love this one. No need to decide which masterpiece is better, enjoy both over and over again...after all, Pamela wrote 8 different books with lots of stories. Hopefully more movies are to come.
I asked a younger acquaintance of mine several years ago (before I knew there would be a new Mary) if she had grown up on Mary Poppins, and the answer was no. Nor had she shared the former film with her young children. I immediately sent her a 40th Anniversary DVD. (It has more background material.)
I was nervous this new film would fall flat by trying to copy the former. Like any piece of art, it ain't art if it's a copy, so I am thrilled by the new film and it's new cache of delightful songs to add to my repertoire. I've seen it 4 times already, and I adore all the loving references (easter eggs) made to former cast members and relationships to the first movie. Gorgeous! The cover is not the book!
Took my boys yesterday and we absolutely loved it. I must admit, I got choked up on more than one occasion.
Mary Poppins left a lifelong impression on my childhood. Took 7 year old daughter to see it. Amazing!!! My daughter said she wishes Mary Poppins was her teacher and that she was nice and didn't take no mess. Rare to see movies like this where an adult runs the show and not the children. A great sequel in a time where sequels fall short but this was an amazing movie
E C3 I’ve never seen a musical or kids film in the cinema where the toddlers and young children were sat on the edge of the seat and could barely move. I was extremely impressed with this musical film. Last film that I was extremely impressed by in the musical genre was Chicago. The kids were in awe Of the imagination, choreography, and sheer energy that came with the film. For me it doesn’t actually for sure anyway because of the attention that they gave it and what it did to the children who were in the screening.
@@SmallGirlBigJapan I totally agree it was good to see a movie that captures what imagination is about. It was good to see behaved kids and someone that was an authoritative adult
Same here.. my 7 yo daughter loved it.. my 3 yo son tho found some of the scenes scary..I prefer the 1964 version.. my dd remarked that I always prefer the originals..like willy wonka.. I'm both dreading and excited to see remakes of Aladdin and lion king coming out...
I refuse to choose who did it better. Both Julie and Emily are fantastic and have their own flare that they brought.
The last time I was this excited for a Disney movie, was the 2017 Beauty and the Beast. I’m beyond excited to see this! Every time I see a trailer for this movie, I can’t help but smile.
I can t wait to see dumbo
Miranda Miller well said both are amazing in there own ways and fantastic films loved each film the sequel was brilliant and yeah more emotional than the first
I think it would have been lovely if the new movie had included the song “through the eyes of love” which was written by the Sherman bros for the first film but was eventually cut from the final version
The sequel will never be as good as the original
Well of course not, but it's nice they brought a sequel in, times do change
Sylvia Pingleton yes, you’re right. But i do not like how they made Mary Poppins look. They made her more sharp and less charming. She comes over as judgemental, which she wasn’t in the original.
@@juliev9942 Well guess the times have changed, perhaps everyone was nicer then ya think, and movies perhaps were softer then now it's like they are larger than life if you know what I mean, not like Wizard of Oz, soft and sweet, not like we were over 20 years ago, also I'm going tomorrow to see this and perhaps I'll let you know what I think, as I myself do judge, so thanks for your reply let you know
Sylvia Pingleton thank you!
Julie's Mary just had a certain poise about her. She was clever, polite and you knew she had her own thoughts and reasons for doing things...like when Michael said, this ones sneaky, lol.
Emily seemed to be to joyful and was oddly quiet. More like banny McPhee? I don't know, just totally different.
Jan, I went to watch “Mary Poppins Returns” last Christmas and I loved it so much! It especially put a smile on my face!
Loved it! The song that Michael Banks sings about his wife that ends "Where did you go"? was the most touching...because that's how all of us feel when we loose someone.
Just saw the new one. It just doesn't compare. The original is one of my fav films
Sarah J.R. U can’t compare these films both are different loved the sequel and fantastic storyline having the kids all grown up guess we can’t please everyone each to their own opinion
Better than original
alistair gunn-malcolm ok I won't compare. But regarding the new one..for starters there was no mesmerizing catchy good music. The music was not good. It was meh. The original -I loved every song and after watching it the first time around as a kid walked away singing the songs. Mary Poppins was more gentle -I loved her interactions with herself in the mirror several times. She was funny, witty, warm, motherly. Great voice, beautiful. I can go on. Also in the original she was more intimate with the kids (singing them to sleep). That song was great. I love Emily as an actress and have seen her in many things but didn't connect with her as Mary. I know she was trying to be more like the book but she was TOO stern looking. No gentle sweetness like Andrews. The kids in the original were sweet and memorable. They had more lines and character. Jane was cute and sweet, Michael had funny faces. I loved their song for the perfect nanny. In this one-nothing. None of them stood out. Not memorable. The little girl played her part well I guess. Lin-Manuel-awful for the part. I didn't like his little rap sequence for a Mary Poppins film. They tried to make it too modern. It didn't fit and I didn't like him as the character, sorry. He had no charisma or touching scenes with the kids, mary such as the first did. There's lots more...I just love the original.
Another thing is they did it too much with the cgi-whatever you call it. The ocean scene, the cartoon scene was too much. The original had as well with the green screen in everything but they did a great job. It just fit and their cartoon scene was everything with the painting, and the carousel horses that went off track. And the dancing penguins. One of my favorite scenes and songs -a jolly holiday with Mary. It's just epic. I watched it again the other night after watching the new one. It made me want to go watch the original. That movie is so nostalgic. I am sure it is different to anyone that didn't see it as a child and are now seeing it as an adult. I am also sure the new one is good to kids these days. Not saying it's not.
Not comparing Julie to E. Blunt, but Julie will be forever Mary Poppins. A sequel 50 or so years later?? Julie is unbeatable ❤️
I love both Mary Poppins and Mary Poppins Returns they both brought tears to my ears and both were practically perfect in every way!!
Saw the movie last night and it was wonderful. Left with a smile and a tune. Didn’t compare movies, it held its own! Can’t wait to buy it so I can watch it again and again.
No one can replace my "practically perfect" magical nanny.
the old mary poopins ALL THE WAY
Mary Poopins?
Definetly best ever the original
This was a DELIGHTFUL sequel. The original was and is AMAZING and can obviously never be outdone. Had you any inclination that it could be? The awe-inspiring imagery, the catchy little tunes and stunning visuals had me smiling in my seat like at little child at the carnival. I went in wanting to enjoy it (instead of judge it) and that's exactly what I did.
What a wonderful break from the usual film fodder and the drudgery of our current affairs in this country. It was downright delicious to see Black characters spicing up scenes in this film too.
Seeing our own Dick Van Dyke was a rare and unexpected treat! When he got up and danced atop that desk, I like to have slipped out of my seat. FABULOUS! He still has The Moves! I do not think Julie Andrews would have detracted or distracted from the film in anyway. I rather think her awesome presence would have enhanced the enchantment of this adorable film...in a most delightful way. I smiled and giggled through the entire film like a child...PRICELESS!
I plan to take my mother, young niece and nephews to see Mary Poppins Returns soon. By the way, the original Mary Poppins was the first movie in a movie theatre that my mother ever saw when my father took her on her 1st date over 50 years ago. Their marriage didn't last, but the magic of Mary Poppins lives on!
BRAVO!
I recently saw it with my little sister and I wonder if they will make a continuation of it. More Mary Poppins adventures will be just great!
Julie Andrews the Best Mary Poppins !!
Julie Andrews Practically Perfect in every way!!
Absolutely correct
Julie Andrews: "Screw it! I'm not gonna make a cameo in Mary Poppins Returns, I'm gonna voice a sea monster in Aquaman!"
It's because Julie didn't want to take any attention off the new Mary.
Julia andrews wasnt asked
I read she turned a cameo down because she thought attention should be on Emily Blunt. Where did you read/hear she wasn’t asked?
right after seeing aquaman, I wanted more underwater fun and stayed in the theater and went to see mary poppins a third time
Sean OBrien she was, she just didnt want to take any attention off Emily
It's not a competition. Julie Andrews and Emily Blunt are actors -neither one of them is a fictional nanny. The sequel doesn't alter one frame of the 1964 film. It's possible to love them both. Unless, of course, you're stunted in the love department.
Absolutely, Dan! I loved both their performances - Emily Blunt was exactly the right person to carry Julie Andrews' Poppins torch! :-)
Spoken as a true member of the everyone-gets-a-goodie-bag generation.
@@mckenna8663 A) I'm considerably older than the generation you snarkily refer to.
B) Why is negativity your default? Who damaged you so?
C) I sincerely hope you find a way to heal from whatever it is that's happened to you that's made you such a jackass. Mary Poppins ( the fictional character) is about finding joy. You desperately need her. I hope you find her.
I must be stunted in the love department then. I loooooove the 1964 version. I merely like the new one.
@@danieleduchene-alessandrin6959 The OP didn't say you HAD to love both...just that if you somehow felt that it's impossible to do so, you're stunted in the love department.
Mary poppins julie andrews always my nanny for mary poppins no other
A Spoonful Of Sugar- Can You Imagine That
Jolly Holiday- The Royal Doulton Music Hall
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious- A Cover Is Not The Book
Stay Awake- The Place Where Lost Things Go
I Love To Laugh-Turning Turtle
Fidelity Fiduciary Bank- the scene where Mary returns Michael’s briefcase
Chim Chiree/Step In Time- Trip A Little Light Fantastic
Let’s Go Fly A Kite- Nowhere To Go But Up
no,both ''jolly holiday'' & ''supercalifragilisticexpeilidocious'' are "a cover is not the book" because jolly holiday features a scene that bert is dancing with the animated penguins
I loved the movie so much growing up and when i was sitting in the theater and it the movie does a upward camera pan of london and focuses on st pauls cathedral, and i thought "this looks as beautiful as my imagination made the first movie look when i was a child".
I love Mary Poppins Returns. It blends something new while showing respect to the original. One thing not mentioned in this clip that impressed me was that the surviving Sherman brother, who wrote the music for the first MP, was a consultant for this movie.
YES!!!!!!! and you can see and hear him at the piano at the end of "christopher robin"
I love the first and I love the second. I’m a grown woman who watched the first with my children 20 years ago and now I’m enjoying watching the new one on my own.. So many insightful lessons for life. Love love love the second in a different way than the first. Both are masterpieces in my book!!
I must also say: it fills me with hope and encouragement that this movie was honored with a sequel in this day and age.
I absolutely loved the movie, and so what if it is different. Flicks and The City did not even mention my favorite song, There's No Where to Go But Up! Many new classics in this movie as well.
Amazing job!!!! I loved the whole movie. I was crying and laughing.
Great job, Jan! This was really comprehensive. Mary Poppins is my favorite Disney film, so I wasn't sure what to expect when I saw Mary Poppins Returns. I found the movie really charming. Watching your video has made me appreciate the movie even more. They did a great job - big shoes to fill. I, too, enjoyed most the number about the book and the cover. My favorite scene was inside the porcelain bowl. I particularly was excited to be taken back to that world - early 20th century London. Thanks for posting! :)
I’m glad P.L Travers book has influenced Emily more than Julie. We love Julie’s but this would’ve pleased P.L more even though they made a sequel against her will and the animation sequence is used other than that she would’ve liked it.
But considering this is a sequel with a slight difference this proves Mary is a timelord it explains the face switch and different attitude lol.
I'm glad someone else sees that as well!
I keep saying that!
They did have to get approval from Travers' estate.
She’s a better 13th Doctor than the 13th Doctor
Sonicguy001 I agree
Welp, to be honest I thought the new version was just ok. The anachronism of BMX bikes in 1930s London was a bit much, and although the new score is energetic, it just doesn't have the wit in the lyrics that the original Sherman Brothers score had. I will say that the first glimpse of Mary silhouetted against the sky did make me tear up a bit, and I absolutely adored seeing Dick Van Dyke in his all singing all dancing glory, along with the throw-back to the wooden leg joke. I think that the original had a lighter touch - this felt a bit like the script was trying to hit you over the head with just how magical everything was going to be, and some of the numbers could have been whittled down a bit. It is refreshing to see 2D animation back up on the big screen where it belongs, tho' so bravo to all the artists involved. Truth time - I used to work for Disney, and I met Julie Andrews while on the job; fortunately saw her coming my way, had a moment to internally prepare while silently squeeing OMG it's Mary Poppins, so - she's always going to be my Mary. She was my childhood and it was such a mind blowing experience to meet her at a time in life when I could absolutely appreciate the moment as it was happening.
Here here! I feel ya.
My thoughts exactly. This script followed the original to a fault, like an annoying young sibling trying to copy their older sibling but not doing a very good job at it. I mean, it's cute, but not great. This was especially apparent in the wanna be Chim Chimney/Step in Time sequence and the Topsy scene. Two scenes that just seemed wedged in their for no other purpose but to follow in the steps of the original. My big question is, are the kids ever going to get their mother's bowl back from Topsy now that Mary's gone? lol
@@crimsonruv5693 Jack knows the way to the shop. Topsy was a character in the original books.
Yes. All of it well said. From the bmx to I know a man with a wooden leg....lmao, loved that scene! The movie needed more of those moments!
You said almost word for word what I was thinking when watching the movie.
Both movies are “Practically Perfect In Every Way!”
I didn't care about Van Dyke's bad British accent. I just loved his energy and dances. In this movie he still has so much energy that I still love. God bless this man!
Wyn Neal I keep hearing how bad it is. But I don’t think it’s that bad. Better than I could do.
We like both Mary Poppins and the kids really enjoyed the movie. They both said that Marry is very magical.
Excellent comparison! Thank you so much! ❤️
I have to say, I think "Mary Poppins Returns" could be the greatest movie I have ever seen. Brilliant and breathtaking from start to finish. I loved the original, too, but for me, overall, the sequel is actually even better. I could watch it a thousand times!
I'm 60 and a lover of Mary Poppins and Julie Andrews in general, as her 3 famous movies exhibit a great role model for young women- smart, assertive, fun, confident, growing.
Saw Mary Poppins Returns and was impressed! It hit all the marks- no ones voice will ever compare to Julie Andrews-but that's Ok! I loved the subtle connections to the original movie, made my 21 year old daughter and me laugh and tear up. I'd like to buy a set of the original and new as my old VCR MP movie just broke last night:(
lie, but ok
"Cover Is Not The Book" felt like a Gertrude Lawernce and Noel Coward number "Has Anybody Seen Our Ship?" .... Ironically, Julie Andrews played Gertie Lawernce in the movie STAR!
I’m glad someone else has noticed this - and she slips to Cockney. Is this Poppins’s true accent, l wonder?
We finally watched it this last weekend and absolutely loooved all of it, choosing a favorite part is nearly impossible but I’d have to pick the Royal Doulton China Bowl sequence.
The soundtrack is great also!!
Saw the movie today and thought they did a fantastic job of it to make sure the magic continues on into the future.
It was surprisingly good! I loved all the references and Easter eggs, it was definitely made with love.
Finally a good sequel!
Loved it!!! Beautiful!
Mary Poppins Returns exceeded my expectations. I can't wait to see it again and I'm obsessed with the soundtrack. I think they went about it all the right way and although the original will always be so special, the sequel feels like a gift. I wouldn't want to see a third movie in the future because I think it would take away each of those feelings.
Agreed!
It's hard to imagine what they would do in a third movie to make it stand out from the first two.
Look, in strict rigor Mary Poppins returns is simply a sequel, it is not a remake, it does not pretend to replace or be better than the first one. This just plans to continue the story.
It is exact same story as the original though, so technically it is also a remake
Mary Poppins has always held a dear place in my heart. Emily did her such justice and as Rob says, there’s no one else who could’ve filled Julie’s shoes better than Emily has. The two movies are so different from each other, yet the parallels, the songs, the animation etc give it such a nostalgic and magical feeling. I cried so much before, during and after having seen the film! I enjoyed it so much I’m going back tomorrow!!! This movie really deserves all the buzz it’s getting and I hope they get that well-deserved Oscar nom!!!
A few years back, I heard Julie was pushing for Anne Hathaway to play MP. I wonder if there was any truth to that.
@@kenfrancisworld8720 To be honest I don't think that's true! It's been said that Julie has been nothing but supportive and enthusiastic about Emily playing Mary! She apparently also tried to keep her hands off the project as much as possible! And Julie herself would've known an American playing the iconic Brit that is Mary Poppins would've never worked!
The sequel was so good. I was impressed, it was a lot of fun. I really appreciated the hand drawn animation and twist on the costumes. There were so many nods to the original - it was great!
I watched it yesterday and I prefer the old one
Me to nothing can beat julie andrews no chance
I thought Emily did a wonderful job as Mary Poppins. But one thing took me out of the film a few times with her performance ... There were a number of times where Emily was smiling so broadly that you could tell she was having a fantastic time making the film. But I don't see that as the Mary Poppins character. Even when Julie Andrews was happy and smiling in the original film, it was a very controlled happiness. Emily's Mary seems to be bursting out of her skin-happy. I would be taken out of the film-magic each time that happened; thrilled to see and share Emily's exuberance, but no longer seeing Mary Poppins in her.
Thank you!! I think they got it all wrong when they said Emily's Mary is closer to the books. Julie's Mary was sterner, as you said, even when she was smiling it was a very controlled happiness and when she was doing something fun she did it "under pressure". Emily's Mary is very joyful, it seems like her sterner side is mostly a very slim charade and inside she obviously is full of love and joy.
I was beaming during the whole movie.
A perfect fantasy escape.
So happy you enjoyed it so very much, Barbra! Me too! It's just a wonderful feel-good film. :-)
Agreed!!!
My wife and I just saw it last night. It might have been a good film if the original hadn't existed, but the longer you watch Mary Poppins Returns, the more you will find you had just rented the original instead. On just about every point you can name, especially with the songs, the original beats the new one,
The problem is that Mary Poppins Returns is supposed to be a sequel, but it mirrors the original film in so many ways that it seems like a remake, and that is the real reason for its downfall. You don't learn anything more about Mary Poppins than you did before, and the film doesn't go into any new or unexpected directions.
If you have kids, by all means, take them. The theatre is was in was full of kids and they loved it. But if you've seen the original, don't bother.
I appreciate your comments here. I was eager to see the film. I remember seeing Mary Poppins the day it was released. I saw the movie in the theater six times.
I was crazy about it. I had the album of the songs, which I played constantly. I drove my parents crazy singing them. I had high hopes for this newer version. Sadly, I left the theater feeling disappointed. People on here say one shouldn't compare the two. How can we not? Mary Poppins Returns is nothing short of derivative, and it comes off as a pale imitation of the 1964 film. I appreciated some of the sly references to the original Poppins movie. In fact, some of them caused choked me up because they reminded me of something in the original. I didn't know that Dick Van Dyke was in this version...I just about lost it when he came on the screen. Chuckling and tearing up at the same time. I wondered if the word scramble of his name in the end credits would replicate the end credits of the original. I was not disappointed. There were so many references that I felt like I was playing a game trying to catch all of them.
Just about every song was a pastiche of the Sherman brothers' work. Julie Andrews, in particular, was known for her impeccable articulation--and in her version, we could understand every lyric. That's one of the reasons why were remember them so well. I think some of the MPR numbers were just fine. The orchestrations did seem rather loud--so much so that I couldn't hear the lyrics. Many of the sly adult references seemed ill advised.
I was surprised that at certain points, I was getting bored. The film didn't know what it wanted to be...original or homage. It's hard to be both. I got the sense that the production team of MPR didn't trust themselves to do something completely different and fresh. I felt the whole experience felt strained. It not only invited comparisons to the original--it demanded it. This did not serve them well.
It's a children's film first and foremost. Kids will love it. From an artistic perspective, I think they were crazy to think that MPR could ever be on par with MP 1964. But the movie will make money. There aren't many movies made for kids these days. Those who remember the original will be curious. It had an impressive cast. But that doesn't naturally make it a good film.
Wonderful! When Dick Van Dyke walked in I was shocked! It was amazing to see him dancing and singing again!
Where the Lost Things Go was my fav song I think, very sweet!
Overall I think they did a great job. Magical in it’s own way while still holding true to the original.
Mary IS a Time Lady! I knew it! 😍
Loved it warmed the heart it didn't try to copy I was afraid of that but after seeing Mary popping returns it was wonderful 😊
Hi, I'm from Malaysia.I just watch this movie in cinema this morning.I like this movie also 1964 version because of Julie Andrews.Actually I'm not really know actors in 2018 version cause I'm not always watch English movie.But I really like their act in this movie and song's and dance are very nice 😍
KATE WONG Wong watching at Mary poppins sings Pink Floyd
I dont think we should compare them. Its not fair to the actors or to the spirit of this great story. I thought Mary Poppins Returns was fabulous, loved every minute of it, the actors were superb, the music wonderful. I think it will take a while for the new songs to be remembered because those old songs had such distinctive, pronunciation and unusual words. Nevertheless less this new movie made me cry, smile and left me with the desire to see it again. Emily Blunt was superb.
Tap left , Tap right how about Mary poppinz I'd tap that 😂
On godah
Great movie!!! I saw the original movie when I was 4 years old and many times after that. This is just as incredible return. We have seen the movie twice. Loved the Vaudeville act with its tongue and cheek humour. I believe the movie should get a number of Oscar nods and Emily Blunt and Lin-Manual should get the Oscars for the performances.
Great movie! When they say you might shed a tear. Well that's an understatement...its nostalgic
Well done review !
Saw Mary Poppins Returns & Emily was Excellent.
Excellent analysis.
Mary Poppins 1964 is still the best.. It is very rare at that time to see a movie like that. Nothing can beat an original movie
This channel basically disappeared from my recommends I guess because I haven't been seeing as many movies lately and didn't want to be spoiled by some of your latest videos. Still, I've hit the notification bell so I don't lose track of this channel again.
Thanks so much for hitting the bell. I understand about the spoilers, what you can do if YT recommends you a video but you don't want to watch it is add it to your "Watch Later" playlist. I think you can do this directly from the home page if a video is recommended there.
4:10 such a sweet glance
I haven't seen it, but you did an excellent review. Love it. As a MP fan, can't wait to see it.
It definitely does!! I am totally smitten with it! There is much to inspire as well as to lift spirits. Love the music, dancing, characters and a show that reminds and helps us reclaim 'magic'. It needn't be left behind in childhood. It's as if the whole movie reminds us of the sweetness of us all and bids us all 'remember'
Love both movies equally
Saw the film last night and really enjoyed it, as did the rest of the full house as there was applause at the end. I agree the best song/dance number was The Cover is Not the Book. Emily Blunt was practically perfect in every way.
Absolutely practically perfect...I loved it.
Julie andrews practically perfect in avery way more than anyone she is the best mary poppins in a full life time
Since it's such a classic, I think that it's perfect that they made a return instead of a remake!
I really enjoyed it 😊
*This is Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious! :D*
Older original is nuch more better
Awesome video
Thanks so much! :-)
I have not seen Mary Poppins returns yet, hopefully see it by the end of the year but because all of the clips and trailers, it looks very good
Fingers crossed you have a lot of fun watching it when you get a chance, Harrison! :-)
@@FlicksAndTheCity OMG! I can't believe you just replied to me. I love your videos and one day could you do a video about the avengers Endgame trailer
@@harrisoncoxon4144 I should have some new Marvel videos in the new year at the latest by the time of Captain Marvel!
Wow I didn't knew that them actor who play Jane in the 1964 version had a camo wow. It is sad that the boy who played Michael from the 64 version couldn't be in it, cause the actor who played Michael in the 1964 version died. He did a great job playing that part and he will be sadly missed.
Mary Poppins Returns is incredible 😭 agree with every word u said 🙏🏼
I seen Mary Poppins Returns yesterday and it was extremely good
Me too 😁😁😁😁😀😀😀😀
Took my nine year old daughter and six year-old son it too. Great movie! They enjoyed it and so did I. Both movies are great.
I just watched it for the first time today and I wish I had watched it sooner! I am in love with the character of jack I think it’s amazing
Also trip a little light fantastic is my favourite song it’s stuck in my head
I saw it yesterday and found it to be delightful. I had hoped that at least one song would have carried over from the first film but all of the new songs are quite good. My favorite was Trip a Little Light Fantastic.
At this point anyone who plays Mary Poppins is fine by me. The most important thing is that she has come back 💖🌂 But seriously Emily Blunt has done a really great job in this movie.
Yes, she's really excellent in the role, totally agree, Nathan! :-)
Nathan Piscopo desef
really enjoyed the movie! emily Blunt was brilliant! x
Dick van Dyke's affected accent in 64 was practically perfect in every way!
As he recounts, he worked on the film with over a dozen accomplished British actors, costarred with Andrews and had a voice coach, well Pat O'Malley. NOBODY corrected his over the top Cockney accent.
To be fair, Andrew's flowergirl accent in "My Fair Lady" on stage was pretty well over the top too.
Does anyone know where to find those lyric videos... I know there are lyric videos but those are gorgeous
I think you got it all wrong when you say Emily's Mary is closer to the books. Julie's Mary was sterner, harsher, even when she was smiling it was a very controlled happiness and when she was doing something fun she did it "under pressure", coerced by the children or Bert. Emily's Mary is very joyful, it seems like her sterner side is mostly a very slim charade and inside she obviously is full of love and joy.
I like both takes on the character. I prefer Bert over Jack, the new actor is half as good. The movie arch is okay. The animation was very refreshing and very well done. The songs are not as catchy as the ones from the original movie.
D-did you j-j-just say, Jack was h-h-alf as good as b-bert?? *HAMILTON FANS TRIGGERED*
I agree totally. I liked Emily and all the wonderful graphics, but the songs were blah to me and as much as I like Lin Manuel Miranda, I found Jack to to a pointless character that could have been omitted altogether without losing a beat. In fact, I wish they would have, then maybe the movie would have been a much more palatable length. The songs weren't catchy enough for this movie to be as long as the first one! lol
I never liked the movie and didn't understand how everyone thought Mary Poppins was a great nanny. I thought she was mean and rude, plus very annoying with those songs. Children need discipline but I always felt like Mary Poppins was sadistic and secretly hated children.
Jack82 My reaction right now. How could you not love Lin-Manuel’s performance??
I have to agree, the EB MP was smiling more than the JA MP and the vision by PT of her creation has JA closer to it than EB.
Dick van Dyke's manner of speaking has such a high nostalgic value to me that I didn't even realise people found it a bad accent. Dick has Dutch blood but I have no idea that's part of the 'problem'. I loved his manner of speaking and gave him so much character
I Just saw the first one liked it very much. Looking forward to see the next because of the next one I saw the first one.
I was overly joy when they announced Emily Blunt as Marry Poppins. She is a great and charming actor
I loved this movie. It's "practically perfect in every way."
Original is still the best!