Tactical yellow card, very smart! Also #10 absolutely deserves a yellow for chucking a ball at someone. I'm not sure how a ref could justify letting that go.
@@TheMaulam12345 It's not a law, football rules work differently. When Zizou hit the guy with his head for offending his family, he just got red card like if it was unprovoked. There are no mitigating factors in football rules and referee's only job is to follow those rules, not the law. And the fact he missed doeasn't change a thing. I saw a player deliberetly trying to kick hard his opponent, he missed and it didn't matter, he got red.
@@vilkhunter853 That's not how that works. Yes, it was a frustratingly annoying move by the goalkeeper. And yes, it is understandable to react the way the field player did. And I might agree that it is ridiculous to punish a wild spectrum of offenses equally with a yellow card. Still, there are rules. And it's not how the world works, but in sports the rules should matter. Both should have gotten a yellow card. If you want to talk about changing the rules, that's a different issue.
To clarify even more Feyenoord goalie knows the other team can play the ball right away with him being totally out of position (they dont have to wait for him to be back in the box), number 10 makes things even worst because the whole purpose of that trickery by the goalie was to kill time
how does number 10 makes things worse? he can't do a quick throw in to his teammate to score since the goalie rolled one in already so he chucked it at him out of frustration.
@@uncertified-banger5595 nah he wasn't trying to waste time, it's minute 37... He was trying to get back to the goal without letting them play, which he already did by throwing the other ball in, so the reaction didn't further affect the team
if this happened during open play and we wanted to prevent opponent from scoring can we throw a ball in to interrupt play and hence prevent opponent from scoring too?
if this happened during open play and we wanted to prevent opponent from scoring can we throw a ball in to interrupt play and hence prevent opponent from scoring too?
Hi Tyler, I just ordered some of your gloves from your website. I was just wondering how long do they usually take to arrive from the date of purchase?
nice video, can you make a similar video where dani olmo leaves the ball on the line! I saw a short video where he does it, but it doesn't have any explanation, and I didn't watch the match!
â@@willmcclard206imagine getting payed millions for playing football and not even being able to play proper football so you try to get an advantage by pretending to get fouled. Its actually pathetic
â@@swizaytracks8196ronaldo and messi dive and they're the best players of this generation, its just how football works, if you can get a foul in a good position you go for it
That is sublime...speed of thought is something else, funnily enough he's taken a yellow for unsportsmanship play, however the forward would be have been guilty of it also taking advantage of the keeper who was unable to get back quick enough, it's cheeky at worst...
why shouldn't him take advantage of that? I mean, why would he be stupid enough to wait for the keeper to return to the goal, if the keeper chose to leave the area to defend his attack?
The thing is there are no rules against kicking the ball into an unattended goal. If the keeper was distracted, out of position or outside the box, it's their fault
What he can do better is to pretend that he thought it is their throw in so take the throw in legally. Then the ref has to stop the game to correct the throw in side and then clear the 2nd ball.
â@@epmcgee â card maybe if the ref notice you aren't really injured. But conceding no, because the ref will have to call attention and then you will be allowed to get back to your position.
They could try but when something like this happens in the game like an external interference 99 times out of 100 the ref will stop the game until everyone is ready to play again kind of like a penalty. There isn't enough thought put towards time wasting partly because they can add extra time at the end.
Not me, but when I was younger, my buddy playing center defense got in front of the attacker during a play, then zig-zagged a bunch of times in front of the ball to deter them from getting to the ball so it would reach my box and I could pick it up. He was called for "creative obstruction"
Actually, you can play with two balls on the field as long as there is no confusion about, which ball that is really played with. In this case it should be fairly obvious.
@@Trep3 And preventing a clear goal chance or unsportsmanlike behaviour are red. Are you saying that this is neither of those things? Cuz it sure seems like both of those to me.
@@gurelarikan8498 unsportsmanlike behavior depends, sometimes its a yellow, sometimes a red, sometimes literally nothing, so I doubt its part of the rules preventing a clear goal chance only applies to open play, the play was stopped, or are you saying stopping a quick free kick from being taken in an advantageous position for the opponent should also be a red?
@@Trep3 There are levels to preventing play and this pushes that line. This isn't the same as a player not moving from in front of the ball when someone wants to take a freekick. He does something extra and very unconventional to prevent play. If the freekick is being taken towards an empty goal (cuz the goalie went forward) from (say) 30 meter distance, then sure, it might be a red, depending on the referee's interpretation of "clear goal chance". So, it depends on the level of the advantage. My point is, what the player did might have been seemingly smart but it was also risky to an extent - referees have some room for making judgement calls and this was inviting a sending-off.
Interesting videos you have - which also unfortunately sometimes show your ignorance of the rules. 1) There is no rule that says you can't play with 2 balls on the field. The rule USED to say that - now it specifically says that you "only stop play if the extra ball interferes with play" and you "allow play to continue if it does not interfere with play and have it removed at the earliest possible opportunity" . What the GK did is an instant cautionable offence (unsporting behavior / attempting to delay the restart of play). What the ref should have done is play on ADVANTAGE to the attacking team and then caution the GK at the next stoppage. [It's actually potentially a Red card for DOGSO]. Yes the attacker commits a Reckless (cautionable) offence for throwing the ball with such force at the GK, but if the attacker had been patient, and the ref had done his job correctly, he would have been taking the throw-in and likely his team would have had a goal-scoring opportunity. There is no such thing as "legally cheating" in football. That's an oxymoron. Sadly all there is are illegal actions and incorrect decisions by referees who allow them to go unpunished sometimes. Seriously Mr Goluremi, don't try this when an experienced, knowledgeable ref is officiating your game. You will get a different outcome. :-0)
Such a boomer comment. How games that are considered a higher level than the Eredivisie have you personally reffed? I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess zero. That extra ball 100% interfered with the play since it was thrown exactly where the attacking player was going to throw his ball. Also, there is a 0% chance you could give a potential red card for DOGSO when the ball isn't even in play. It would be like kicking the ball away when the other team is trying to start a quick free kick. Please find me one example where someone got a red card for something like that. And lastly while trying your best to sound like the smartest guy in the room you completely overlooked that there's this thing called "clickbait". That was obviously put in the title to grab attention because it's an oxymoron. Just go back to reffing your Sunday league matches, its a better look for you anyways.
@@kjn3350 letter of the law and all that. Personally I agree with you, but ou can't react like that. It's same as putting a hand on an opposition players face or throat. Red card.
That was the most idiotic thing I've ever seen in my life. Goalie should've gotten a red card, because there's no element of accident in that play. Unlike rough tackle or handball which may or may not be intentional... that was based on pure malice with clear intention of cheating. This was equivalent with biting in boxing or or flipping table in chess. 100% intentional, no accidental nor technical justification for it, should've been a red card. He was lucky he got a wimp referee. A real referee would give a red card; and the title of the video would be "The Dumbest GK Ever".
what he did right there my friend, was time wasting, and it is an actual tactic in most of the sports you have just mentioned, you are to imply that because the goalkeeper tactically wasted time to get himself back to position before the offense could play a fast throw, was deserving of a red card?
â@@dantheman2415 Check Higuita or Denilson. They did time wasting done right. This here, was not tactical time wasting. It was intentional foul based on malice. Example: When Montiel handballed, ref gave a penalty and yellow card. When Suarez handballed, ref gave a penalty and red card. Same offense, same goal denying possibility, same penalty punishment, different card. What gives? Well... Montiel's handball was accidental. Suarez clearly and intentionally stretched his hand to touch the ball. One without malice, yellow card. One with malice, deservedly red card. That's my position. You can waste time. But you can't intentionally break the rule. You accidentally broke rules? Yellow. You obviously and intentionally broke rules? Straight to red.
stopping the restart of play is a yellow, no matter how intentional it is, those are the rules, if the referee gave a red that'd be abuse of power and he mightve gotten punished if it was appealed, this isn't up for discussion if you're proposing the rule itself should be changed, that's a different story, but the ref 100% made the correct decision according to the current rules
@@Trep3 "A red card will be shown to a player who has committed a serious offense, such as violent conduct or an illegal or purposeful obstruction of goal scoring opportunity for the opposing team". The keywords being "purposeful obstruction of goal scoring opportunity". Remember the gk was out of position. That was a purposeful obstruction of goal scoring opportunity. Intention matter. In fact, that's what matter the most. Red card. And btw, that rule wasn't me. That was FIFA.
That's just disgraceful. People will admire that, just like they will admire a last defender slaughtering the attacker to avoid a goal at the last minute of a game. But that's not football, that's just trash.
boohoo, you say that but if you were him and had the opportunity to do that you'd do the exact same thing, the rules allow it so why not take advantage of it?
Somebody tried that in a match involving another Dutch club (PSV), and he will be spending the next 2 months in jail. Plus he's never allowed to enter any football stadium again. Pick your fights wisely
For me this should be red card. Is cheating100%. They should make a rule about that.. Happened something like that with cheating in a Greek Derby a month ago. A player stopped a very dangerous counter attack by entering the pitch while he was out for first aid without asking permission to enter the pitch. For me this should be automatically red card
@@Trep3 I know. But this is huge cheating.. Is like handballing the ball before the ball cross the line. There is stop play in normal situation and stop play intentionally to not score. It shouldnot be the same way penalised
Tactical yellow card, very smart! Also #10 absolutely deserves a yellow for chucking a ball at someone. I'm not sure how a ref could justify letting that go.
justified tbh. put yourself in his shoes
@21stfiction12 its not how law work in most case, they willl consider why he doing that to reduce the punishment also the ball didnot hit other guy so
@@TheMaulam12345 It's not a law, football rules work differently. When Zizou hit the guy with his head for offending his family, he just got red card like if it was unprovoked. There are no mitigating factors in football rules and referee's only job is to follow those rules, not the law. And the fact he missed doeasn't change a thing. I saw a player deliberetly trying to kick hard his opponent, he missed and it didn't matter, he got red.
Bro he was about to kill himđđđđđđđđđđđ
@@vilkhunter853 That's not how that works.
Yes, it was a frustratingly annoying move by the goalkeeper. And yes, it is understandable to react the way the field player did. And I might agree that it is ridiculous to punish a wild spectrum of offenses equally with a yellow card.
Still, there are rules. And it's not how the world works, but in sports the rules should matter. Both should have gotten a yellow card.
If you want to talk about changing the rules, that's a different issue.
Title [NOT CLICKBAIT]
Thumbnail [CLICKBAIT] "Forgot he's a goalkeeper"
That's why i just can't put a thumb up on those type videos
The thumb made me think he was making a side throw like a regular player.
It isn't "legally cheating." It's just that the penalty is worth the benefit.
he's using a loophol, thus he cheated legally
@@aidanjanemcintosh6919 there is no loophole for this--he cheated but was a smart move
To clarify even more Feyenoord goalie knows the other team can play the ball right away with him being totally out of position (they dont have to wait for him to be back in the box), number 10 makes things even worst because the whole purpose of that trickery by the goalie was to kill time
how does number 10 makes things worse? he can't do a quick throw in to his teammate to score since the goalie rolled one in already so he chucked it at him out of frustration.
@@Zycon10 Number 10 caused more time to be wasted by lashing out. Playing right into the keepers hands
@@uncertified-banger5595 nah he wasn't trying to waste time, it's minute 37... He was trying to get back to the goal without letting them play, which he already did by throwing the other ball in, so the reaction didn't further affect the team
@@anotheripodguythatâs why he was trying to waste time, so he could get back to his position without having to stress
@@pyro_life676 he was trying to waste enough* time to get into his goal, every second more wasn't really intended
I have seen big brain plays before, but this is next level.
if this happened during open play and we wanted to prevent opponent from scoring can we throw a ball in to interrupt play and hence prevent opponent from scoring too?
â@@andyng5321that would probably result in a red card
â@@andyng5321 yea but ref probably will give penalty
@@wowok8375 nah won't
the daily dose of goalkeeping
đ
if this happened during open play and we wanted to prevent opponent from scoring can we throw a ball in to interrupt play and hence prevent opponent from scoring too?
yeah but you'll get a bad punishment for that@@andyng5321
I'm a feyenoord fan and i rolled on the floor when Justin Bijlow (our goalie) did this!
Did you later win the away game
We Drew the gameâ@@chibuezenduka628
When your goalkeeper is a chess player.
Iâd be interested if you started uploading and examining short clips like this (similar to Isaac Punts), would live to see more
Dang bro, the content grind is real
Should be having another video out Sunday
@@GKGOLUREMI awesome! Keep up the great work
The guy even had the nerve to get where the ref was and go all "look bro he hit me with da ball, give him a card>:((("
Repeated 10x still laughingđđ€Łđ€Ł, absolutely genius
Hi Tyler, I just ordered some of your gloves from your website. I was just wondering how long do they usually take to arrive from the date of purchase?
Lol no response
đŠđŠđŠ
Are they there yet?
nice video, can you make a similar video where dani olmo leaves the ball on the line! I saw a short video where he does it, but it doesn't have any explanation, and I didn't watch the match!
Very smart! Part of playing the game is knowing the rules. Players do far worse in this sport to blatantly cheat( fake diving, acting to name just 2)
â@@willmcclard206imagine getting payed millions for playing football and not even being able to play proper football so you try to get an advantage by pretending to get fouled. Its actually pathetic
â@@swizaytracks8196ronaldo and messi dive and they're the best players of this generation, its just how football works, if you can get a foul in a good position you go for it
That's what i call quick thinking đ€Ł
Do you know how to do Rene higuitas scorpion kick? If yes can you make a tutorial
just scorpion kick
That is sublime...speed of thought is something else, funnily enough he's taken a yellow for unsportsmanship play, however the forward would be have been guilty of it also taking advantage of the keeper who was unable to get back quick enough, it's cheeky at worst...
why shouldn't him take advantage of that? I mean, why would he be stupid enough to wait for the keeper to return to the goal, if the keeper chose to leave the area to defend his attack?
The thing is there are no rules against kicking the ball into an unattended goal. If the keeper was distracted, out of position or outside the box, it's their fault
Next set piece, that goalkeeper is getting an elbow right through the boat race
That was good I like this keeper, the dark arts of football đ
He's back!!
That's actually very smart / quick thinking
I can feel the anger from #10 đđđđ
Right if have to cheat to win you didn't win
The pass tho đđœ
What he can do better is to pretend that he thought it is their throw in so take the throw in legally.
Then the ref has to stop the game to correct the throw in side and then clear the 2nd ball.
If I'd been a fan of the red team, I'd be furious at the 'keeper. 8-((...
If I'd been a fan of the 'keepr's team, I'd be laughing my head off. 8-))...
Jose Mourinho rule number 1:Cheat or break rules in football if it's necessary
@GK GOLUREMI when u are going long should use a side volley like should u skim midway like usal or sort hit it higher
Nice vid mate
Yeah Some Smart Stuff ..he knew that they would scare
Outstanding move.
Sportsmanship: 0
Thinking on the spot: 100
That was gold
Crazy.
I would have pretend I was injured after the sliding tackle and would return to the box card free
if your off the pitch the game doesnât have to be stopped, and if you slid in you would be far off the pitch like the gk was
@@lol-bg4wh it's in the rules, there's no game without GK and he wasn't out of the pitch after the slide
@@goleiropresba i never heard of that, could be true , too lazy to bother
@@goleiropresba you'd still run the risk of getting carded and conceding.
â@@epmcgee â card maybe if the ref notice you aren't really injured. But conceding no, because the ref will have to call attention and then you will be allowed to get back to your position.
when did this match take place?
It's possible to play with two balls if the second ball doesn't interfere on the game... The #10 was just dumb
Tactical fouls are also a part of the game
This reminds me of when Henry Kessler of the New England Revolution threw a ball into the stands to waste time
The ref will just add time for that
This isn't cheating just 200iq moments
First keeper changed his gamemode to spectator
Is it yellow?
THAT'S NOT CHEATING, THAT'S SMART
It's actually both
The TWE player should also have seen a yellow.
Couldn't they just kick the ball out quickly and proceed with their attack?
They could try but when something like this happens in the game like an external interference 99 times out of 100 the ref will stop the game until everyone is ready to play again kind of like a penalty. There isn't enough thought put towards time wasting partly because they can add extra time at the end.
"If you can't run fast enough to your position before the game started again, them make the game DID NOT start"
~ the goalkeeper (probably)
You can not play if there are two balls on a pitch đđ
200 IQ gameplay
It was a smart move by th3 goalkeeper I would do the same if I was in his place
If its not patched, its a feature
Smartest goalkeeper i have ever seen
Nice vidéo
Glad you enjoyed it
Football IQ
what caused the yellow for the GK?
It would be for time wasting since he intentionally delayed the game
What's the most creative way you guys have stopped an dangerous attack?
Not me, but when I was younger, my buddy playing center defense got in front of the attacker during a play, then zig-zagged a bunch of times in front of the ball to deter them from getting to the ball so it would reach my box and I could pick it up. He was called for "creative obstruction"
Stay in the ground pretending you are injured, there's no game without a goalkeeper, card free solution.
Bundesliga goalkeeper digged small hole by shoes and shooter slided on it.
He is genius
Goal keeping 500 IQ
His move was not legal hence the yellow
Intelligence
How come this is not a penalty!!!
my lastborn brother
I feel like we shouldn't encourage cheating , legal or not , even if it's smart .
i read "the other team can play the ball right away with him being totally out of position " .so much for "fairplay"
IQ 9000
Playing to the rules
đ smart move
Too bad they other team managed to draw the game đ
A point is still better than nothing
And the difference is losing or drawing.
When you a law graduate but goalkeeping pays more
This why is getting born watching These games should been red card
đ
No worse than diving
So now you can score 2 in one goal because there's 2 balls.
How are colourblind fans supposed to tell the teams apart?
Not surprising really. Football is usually won by the side that cheats best.
goalkeeper should be an striker
Actually, you can play with two balls on the field as long as there is no confusion about, which ball that is really played with.
In this case it should be fairly obvious.
Is a red card appripriate?
Yo why does he Get the credit Manuel Neuer did it first vs Salzburg in Champions league his was even more hilarious @GK GOLUREMI
Cause Neuer made the selfish decision to do it in champions league. UEFA would copyright and block that video in a second
Footbal soccer?
How about a red for unsportsmanlike behaviour or preventing a clear goal chance? It is very risky and the color of the card is up for interpretation.
No you do not get a red for trowing a ball in the field. There is no interpretation here.
stopping the restart of play is a yellow, nothing more, you can't make up rules on the spot, not up for interpretation
@@Trep3 And preventing a clear goal chance or unsportsmanlike behaviour are red. Are you saying that this is neither of those things? Cuz it sure seems like both of those to me.
@@gurelarikan8498 unsportsmanlike behavior depends, sometimes its a yellow, sometimes a red, sometimes literally nothing, so I doubt its part of the rules
preventing a clear goal chance only applies to open play, the play was stopped, or are you saying stopping a quick free kick from being taken in an advantageous position for the opponent should also be a red?
@@Trep3 There are levels to preventing play and this pushes that line. This isn't the same as a player not moving from in front of the ball when someone wants to take a freekick. He does something extra and very unconventional to prevent play.
If the freekick is being taken towards an empty goal (cuz the goalie went forward) from (say) 30 meter distance, then sure, it might be a red, depending on the referee's interpretation of "clear goal chance". So, it depends on the level of the advantage.
My point is, what the player did might have been seemingly smart but it was also risky to an extent - referees have some room for making judgement calls and this was inviting a sending-off.
Yzz
Did the guy who threw the ball at him get a yellow card?
no
Interesting videos you have - which also unfortunately sometimes show your ignorance of the rules. 1) There is no rule that says you can't play with 2 balls on the field. The rule USED to say that - now it specifically says that you "only stop play if the extra ball interferes with play" and you "allow play to continue if it does not interfere with play and have it removed at the earliest possible opportunity" .
What the GK did is an instant cautionable offence (unsporting behavior / attempting to delay the restart of play). What the ref should have done is play on ADVANTAGE to the attacking team and then caution the GK at the next stoppage. [It's actually potentially a Red card for DOGSO].
Yes the attacker commits a Reckless (cautionable) offence for throwing the ball with such force at the GK, but if the attacker had been patient, and the ref had done his job correctly, he would have been taking the throw-in and likely his team would have had a goal-scoring opportunity.
There is no such thing as "legally cheating" in football. That's an oxymoron. Sadly all there is are illegal actions and incorrect decisions by referees who allow them to go unpunished sometimes.
Seriously Mr Goluremi, don't try this when an experienced, knowledgeable ref is officiating your game. You will get a different outcome. :-0)
Such a boomer comment. How games that are considered a higher level than the Eredivisie have you personally reffed? I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess zero. That extra ball 100% interfered with the play since it was thrown exactly where the attacking player was going to throw his ball. Also, there is a 0% chance you could give a potential red card for DOGSO when the ball isn't even in play. It would be like kicking the ball away when the other team is trying to start a quick free kick. Please find me one example where someone got a red card for something like that. And lastly while trying your best to sound like the smartest guy in the room you completely overlooked that there's this thing called "clickbait". That was obviously put in the title to grab attention because it's an oxymoron. Just go back to reffing your Sunday league matches, its a better look for you anyways.
I saw this game live đ 200 game IQ
150 IQ probably, better would have been pretending an injury, there's no game with an injured GK...
@@goleiropresba there subbed gk
Smort
The concept "Legally Cheating" is just so stupid
Smartest??? No. This is probably the easiest way to get a yellow card.
feyenoord clear
First
smart
The ref.could've ignored that and let the game go on.
Professional fouls are part of the game, the guy in red should have been sent off for throwing the ball at the keeper though.
Sounds a bit harsh. Players get away with a lot, so a straight red would be pushing it. Perhaps a yellow, but even then he didn't hit him, so...
No
@@kjn3350 letter of the law and all that. Personally I agree with you, but ou can't react like that. It's same as putting a hand on an opposition players face or throat. Red card.
I would have given the goalkeeper a red card first he actually sort of cheated and he denied a scoring opportunity
Then you would break the rules as referee
you can't just give out cards as you wish, there are rules for this, and they say that it's a yellow card for stopping the restart of play
That was the most idiotic thing I've ever seen in my life. Goalie should've gotten a red card, because there's no element of accident in that play. Unlike rough tackle or handball which may or may not be intentional... that was based on pure malice with clear intention of cheating.
This was equivalent with biting in boxing or or flipping table in chess. 100% intentional, no accidental nor technical justification for it, should've been a red card.
He was lucky he got a wimp referee. A real referee would give a red card; and the title of the video would be "The Dumbest GK Ever".
Hahaha demn how dumb can you beđđđ
what he did right there my friend, was time wasting, and it is an actual tactic in most of the sports you have just mentioned, you are to imply that because the goalkeeper tactically wasted time to get himself back to position before the offense could play a fast throw, was deserving of a red card?
â@@dantheman2415 Check Higuita or Denilson. They did time wasting done right. This here, was not tactical time wasting. It was intentional foul based on malice.
Example: When Montiel handballed, ref gave a penalty and yellow card. When Suarez handballed, ref gave a penalty and red card. Same offense, same goal denying possibility, same penalty punishment, different card.
What gives? Well... Montiel's handball was accidental. Suarez clearly and intentionally stretched his hand to touch the ball. One without malice, yellow card. One with malice, deservedly red card.
That's my position. You can waste time. But you can't intentionally break the rule. You accidentally broke rules? Yellow. You obviously and intentionally broke rules? Straight to red.
stopping the restart of play is a yellow, no matter how intentional it is, those are the rules, if the referee gave a red that'd be abuse of power and he mightve gotten punished if it was appealed, this isn't up for discussion
if you're proposing the rule itself should be changed, that's a different story, but the ref 100% made the correct decision according to the current rules
@@Trep3 "A red card will be shown to a player who has committed a serious offense, such as violent conduct or an illegal or purposeful obstruction of goal scoring opportunity for the opposing team".
The keywords being "purposeful obstruction of goal scoring opportunity". Remember the gk was out of position. That was a purposeful obstruction of goal scoring opportunity. Intention matter. In fact, that's what matter the most. Red card.
And btw, that rule wasn't me. That was FIFA.
That's just disgraceful. People will admire that, just like they will admire a last defender slaughtering the attacker to avoid a goal at the last minute of a game.
But that's not football, that's just trash.
boohoo, you say that but if you were him and had the opportunity to do that you'd do the exact same thing, the rules allow it so why not take advantage of it?
Lost me at soccer
If I was a spectator there, I would've run on and punched that keeper in the face for that dirty cowardly play
Somebody tried that in a match involving another Dutch club (PSV), and he will be spending the next 2 months in jail. Plus he's never allowed to enter any football stadium again.
Pick your fights wisely
For me this should be red card. Is cheating100%. They should make a rule about that.. Happened something like that with cheating in a Greek Derby a month ago. A player stopped a very dangerous counter attack by entering the pitch while he was out for first aid without asking permission to enter the pitch. For me this should be automatically red card
stopping the restart of play is a yellow card
@@Trep3 I know. But this is huge cheating.. Is like handballing the ball before the ball cross the line. There is stop play in normal situation and stop play intentionally to not score. It shouldnot be the same way penalised
@@terrydermatas731 maybe so, if it was a red he probably wouldnt have done it, he only did it because he knew he wouldnt get sent off