I’d have liked to have seen what the old set is like now and some close ups of the wood and plastic they said it was built from. They should’ve also shown inside the Queen Vic now.
The new set is absolutely amazing I really like it every still looks exactly the same but when you see the wooden doors they look so much more fresh and modern
I watched this from its introduction in Australia in the 80s to when the ABC took it off. Does it still have the same theme tune, which is inside my head at the moment?
Has anyone done a side by side comparison of the old set and the new set? Either by video or through ariel view still photos. Just curious to see if there are any differences.
Hi Guy's my name is Mr C. T. Boxill-Harris I was wondering, why coudn't you find a nice fresh shiny Leyland Titan B15's and Repaint them to a Grey Green Colour’s just like the original Scania Grey Green's which were in the East London bus route's such as 125, 167, 179, 173, 168, 141, 66, 275, 313 and also the bus route 103, if you guy would like to find about 17 Leyland Titan B15's, please could you Repaint them in the Exact Grey Green Bus Colour’s and put them in EastEnders for all of us because it would be a Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Interesting Buses to see them Repainted to a Grey Green Colours and put them in EastEnders, Because I'am a Big Fan of all of those Leyland Titan B15 Buses 😉😉😉😄😄
Corrie had a new set built in 2014 and, when watching older episodes or archive clips, there are one or two telltale signs of which set they were using at the time. If you know what to look for, that is.
@@stevek6432 The 2014 Corrie set was designed to enable HD filming (which couldn't be done on the old set) and make filming easier for the actors and production crew. It also incorporated a police station, hospital A&E & wards and magistrates & crown court interiors for filming so the whole show could be filmed on one site, making it more cost effective and reducing the carbon footprint.
For example the minute mart or something is not actually set it has always been a real indoor shop on the square but it never used to have heating so with the door left open it be so cold but now it has heating built in
£87 million compared to £10 million for Coronation Street set. It's easy to see who's having to earn their money to pay for the set while the other is paid for by the gullible folk still paying for the TV licence!
We literally saw Steve blow up in a car. It would have been impossible for him to return. He was definitively dead. We never saw Kathy and Den actually die which is why they could loophole around it and bring them back.
They have. They’ve changed some areas near the archers and behind Grays house. They’ve also built new signs and buildings around the set and added a new area outside the Albert.
@@AndrewChapman no idea, bbc not cashing in like itv have? which is daft. i just like the way people ask can we visit like it's a given. if we could visit we'd know we could
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back.
@@mrspotts3480 the tiny percentage of money that this took from each license fee payer (if any) is almost certainly insignificant next to what football costs people. So yeh football did probably cost them more
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back
@@johnking5174 if that’s the cases. Why are we paying license fees. If they are getting money from somewhere else. I don’t believe that for 1 second. Completely rubbish programme and is a waste of money. 86 million for a tv soap set it’s idiotic. They could make film for that and doubled their money. Overrated tv show.
@@soullove763 Hi. I can clarify that the commercial arm of the BBC has been there since the 1950s when the then conservative government felt the BBC could supplement their income from the licence fee by commercial means. Please remember, it is supplementing their licence fee. Now BBC Studios generally reports a profit of around £200 million a year. Bare in mind this is profit, and NOT the commonly reported £1 billion annual revenue. A lot of people confuse revenue with profit. That £200 million is given back to the main BBC. The licence fee is designed to cover the funding of programming that other commercial broadcasters would simply never touch. Production of religious programming. Coverage of parliament. Unprofitable documentaries. Kids programmes.
@@soullove763 All salaries for Eastenders cast are funded from BBC Studios, using their commercially generated financial revenue to fund them. This is the same for ALL BBC Studios productions. The Graham Norton Show for example is produced by So Television for BBC Studios. This is why Graham Norton's salary for his talk show is £3 million as it is commercial money paying it, and NOT licence fee money.
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back.
What a waste of big sum of money of the taxpayers when you can’t even tell the difference. They should just have stuck it out on the old set considering the flop in ratings now! 🙄
I need to clarify this - that £87 million is actually being funded from the commercial arm of the BBC - BBC Studios. Eastenders is produced by BBC Studios, and they use their commercially generated financial revenue to fund that £87 million
@@johnking5174 This information is interesting for these reasons: 1) It maybe BBC Studios who makes EE but they’re budget is allocated to them by BBC Head of Programs that comes from taxpayers licence fees. 2) the fact that BBC ‘s commercial arm BBC studio make stuff to sell overseas means that BBC actually makes money out of the produced stuff made by BBC Studios means that it proves that BBC can make their own revenues and become independent by being commercial & enterprising. So all they need to do is reinvest into the BBC by making programs they want to make without a) annoying their current employers ie the public and be accused of wasting taxpayers money. b) pay however much salary they want to pay their thousands of employees without having to justify it to the angry public. So bottom line is that BBC can obviously be an independent company on its own without having to force and imprison anyone who do not want to pay a money pit draconian institution! It’s the 21st century already in case the greedy BBC refuse to acknowledge that there are other platforms that exist in the real world. BBC model is from the past and has no place in the current digital world of entertainment!
@@chijavier1869 Hi. I can clarify that the commercial arm of the BBC has been there since the 1950s when the then conservative government felt the BBC could supplement their income from the licence fee by commercial means. Please remember, it is supplementing their licence fee. Now BBC Studios generally reports a profit of around £200 million a year. Bare in mind this is profit, and NOT the commonly reported £1 billion annual revenue. A lot of people confuse revenue with profit. That £200 million is given back to the main BBC. The licence fee is designed to cover the funding of programming that other commercial broadcasters would simply never touch. Production of religious programming. Coverage of parliament. Unprofitable documentaries. Kids programmes.
Disgusting amount of tax payers money £87 million just to replicate a set which is almost exactly the same. The show isn’t what it was in the 80s and 90s.
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back
Losing viewers but has 20% audience share which is quite something in this day and age. Even if Eastenders gets cancelled in 10 years time it'll still work out cheaper than filling the 7:30pm slot four nights a week with new content.
Eastenders does not rely on overnight audience viewers anymore. Millions watch it on demand on the BBC iPlayer. In fact a typical episode of Eastenders might get 3.5 million overnight viewers, but within a week that episode would rocket up to 6 million after BBC iPlayer views.
What a disgusting waste of other people's money. £87 million on a show that's had its best days . Just goes to show that it's easy to waste other people's money.
I need to clarify this - that £87 million is actually being funded from the commercial arm of the BBC - BBC Studios. Eastenders is produced by BBC Studios, and they use their commercially generated financial revenue to fund that £87 million.
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back
So 8 months ago it went woke, i will mark it in my diary! Fed up with people saying things have gone woke, but no one actually explains what they mean. From what I can work out, it usually means they dont like seeing non white people and non straight people. Basically I guess they are saying they are bigoted and only want to see white heterosexuality on tv and nothing else! Or perhaps they are not happy there is not enough racism, sexism and homophobia shown to please their bigoted appetites. All I can say is, the "anti-woke" brigade are the biggest moaners and snowflakes going and to need to grow up! "ooooh theres a black person, im scared", "ooooh theres a man kissing a man, disgusting", "ooooh theres a woman in charge of her self, get back in the kitchen!"
I’d have liked to have seen what the old set is like now and some close ups of the wood and plastic they said it was built from. They should’ve also shown inside the Queen Vic now.
there's a few videos online if you look for them
The new set is absolutely amazing I really like it every still looks exactly the same but when you see the wooden doors they look so much more fresh and modern
They've done an amazing job, it really does seem like the same place we've seen on TV over the past 37 years.
bar the fact the sun's in the wrong place as it's flipped 90 degrees, queen vic door used to face west, now faces south
This was so cool. I’ve been watching since this beginning so this is an exciting time for Eastenders.
Can't wait for eastenders episodes next week
Steve owen back from the dead 20 years later
Kellie Bright 😍😍😍😍 I've missed Linda sooooooo much
Kelly Bright? Not so Bright is she? She chose alcohol again over her children, family and her marriage
@@juniourst3ven596 That’s the character, not the actress 🥴
@@juniourst3ven596 Shut your mouth and learn how to differentiate between an actor and a fictional character
I wish they would open the old set to the public so we can tour it before they tear it down.
I watched this from its introduction in Australia in the 80s to when the ABC took it off. Does it still have the same theme tune, which is inside my head at the moment?
Slightly different variation but mostly the same yes.
@@MsPinkwolf Thanks Pesky. Now it's stuck in my head again. Da da da da da dum dum...
Wow so cool
And then as Martin Kemp enters the Vic, Phil appears "What ya doin' back from the dead?! Get out before I smash ya face in again! C'MON OUT!!"
THEY MADE MARTIN KEMP DO IT YESSS BOI
Stacey 😍
Has anyone done a side by side comparison of the old set and the new set? Either by video or through ariel view still photos. Just curious to see if there are any differences.
Love the new set👍🙂
I don't know why they keep playing with Eastenders... that and Killing Eve are the only reasons I pay my TV licence
Had to chew on ice so the heat from your breath wouldn't expose the fact the room was freezing!!
Great video. ☺️
Thanks 😊
Hug 🤗 and the kids are so happy
@@miabrucefan Ur welcome. ☺
ooh
Lol Steve Owen back from the dead
Hi Guy's my name is Mr C. T. Boxill-Harris I was wondering, why coudn't you find a nice fresh shiny Leyland Titan B15's and Repaint them to a Grey Green Colour’s just like the original Scania Grey Green's which were in the East London bus route's such as 125, 167, 179, 173, 168, 141, 66, 275, 313 and also the bus route 103, if you guy would like to find about 17 Leyland Titan B15's, please could you Repaint them in the Exact Grey Green Bus Colour’s and put them in EastEnders for all of us because it would be a Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Interesting Buses to see them Repainted to a Grey Green Colours and put them in EastEnders, Because I'am a Big Fan of all of those Leyland Titan B15 Buses 😉😉😉😄😄
Corrie had a new set built in 2014 and, when watching older episodes or archive clips, there are one or two telltale signs of which set they were using at the time. If you know what to look for, that is.
the corrie set is bigger than the old one, the ee one seems to be the same dimensions, just built as proper building
@@stevek6432 The 2014 Corrie set was designed to enable HD filming (which couldn't be done on the old set) and make filming easier for the actors and production crew. It also incorporated a police station, hospital A&E & wards and magistrates & crown court interiors for filming so the whole show could be filmed on one site, making it more cost effective and reducing the carbon footprint.
Have they rebuilt the interior studio sets too or are they still the same sets?
They could have shown us some of the insides of the sets.
The interiors remain unchanged, based in the BBC Elstree studios. It is only the exteriors that was changed.
@@johnking5174 l meant inside the actual buildings.
I hope to see Linda back ….
Grey’s out of there!!! 👍👍
It cost enough to be built
What did they mean when they said there’s heating in the new buildings? So they did used to use the restaurant outdoor sets?
For example the minute mart or something is not actually set it has always been a real indoor shop on the square but it never used to have heating so with the door left open it be so cold but now it has heating built in
£87 million compared to £10 million for Coronation Street set. It's easy to see who's having to earn their money to pay for the set while the other is paid for by the gullible folk still paying for the TV licence!
Jackie moyler happy birthday 🎈 🎂 15 week Monday EastEnders coronation day 8 click 6pm tonight now EastEnders next week Monday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Friday Saturday Sunday week Monday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Friday Saturday Sunday week kend Monday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Friday Saturday Sunday
I wish they'd brought Steve Owen back when Mel and their son turned up.
Didn't he die?
@@MsPinkwolf Yeah but so did Dirty Den and Kathy and a load more who returned.
@@darkwoods1954 but we didn't see them die and no bodies were found. Steve died in an accident in the middle of the square from what I remember.
We literally saw Steve blow up in a car. It would have been impossible for him to return. He was definitively dead. We never saw Kathy and Den actually die which is why they could loophole around it and bring them back.
@@Becksnnc We also saw Mel get strangled to death but she manages to turn up to her own wedding.
They could've added new areas to the set
I *think* the old set is being demolished and some new areas built over it.
Well there is a little street next to The Arches with a Chinese takeaway at 3:37.
They have. They’ve changed some areas near the archers and behind Grays house. They’ve also built new signs and buildings around the set and added a new area outside the Albert.
@@lew5547 Plus some of the houses on Albert Square now have garages and back gardens.
There shouldn't knocked down the old sets there used it for visitors attractions
What will happen to the old set and where is the set from the 1990s
That area will be demolished, and transformed into new studio space at BBC Elstree.
there's only been one other set which they used from 1985
Can we visit
it's a working tv studio not disney land
@@stevek6432 They have tours on the Corrie set, so why not EastEnders as well?
@@AndrewChapman no idea, bbc not cashing in like itv have? which is daft. i just like the way people ask can we visit like it's a given. if we could visit we'd know we could
When will it be canceled? No one watches TV anymore
No, they're watching it on BBC iPlayer instead😄
Eastbenders. This show promotes immortality and indecency and filth.
It promotes vampirism?
@@VengaboysRbackINtown what are you on about, are you trying to be funny?
@@fehmidabibi5055 Nope.
@@VengaboysRbackINtown well in total this show is Evil just like great dustbin I mean Britain government and its values
Immortality? Most EastEnders characters get killed off lol
& the set cost TV licence payer's an ENFORCED eye watering £85 million !!! ... What a Scam ! You could build a huge housing estate for the same cost.
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back.
I don't care how many times they build an EastEnders set, the show's still SHIT!
East enders should be binned
Ok. They're going to bin it after spending multi millions on a new set because you don't like it. Maybe I can persuade them to bin football.
@@MsPinkwolf Football didn't cost other people £86 million .
@@mrspotts3480 no, it cost them even more
@@obiwankenobi687 No it didn't
@@mrspotts3480 the tiny percentage of money that this took from each license fee payer (if any) is almost certainly insignificant next to what football costs people. So yeh football did probably cost them more
Stopped watching after Oates and Sen got their hands on it and turned it into Hollyoaks.
Sorry for negative view, but £86 million of TV license money what a huge waste on something not really required.
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back
@@johnking5174 if that’s the cases. Why are we paying license fees. If they are getting money from somewhere else. I don’t believe that for 1 second.
Completely rubbish programme and is a waste of money. 86 million for a tv soap set it’s idiotic. They could make film for that and doubled their money. Overrated tv show.
@@soullove763 Hi. I can clarify that the commercial arm of the BBC has been there since the 1950s when the then conservative government felt the BBC could supplement their income from the licence fee by commercial means. Please remember, it is supplementing their licence fee. Now BBC Studios generally reports a profit of around £200 million a year. Bare in mind this is profit, and NOT the commonly reported £1 billion annual revenue. A lot of people confuse revenue with profit. That £200 million is given back to the main BBC. The licence fee is designed to cover the funding of programming that other commercial broadcasters would simply never touch. Production of religious programming. Coverage of parliament. Unprofitable documentaries. Kids programmes.
Who pay’s salaries of the big stars?
@@soullove763 All salaries for Eastenders cast are funded from BBC Studios, using their commercially generated financial revenue to fund them. This is the same for ALL BBC Studios productions. The Graham Norton Show for example is produced by So Television for BBC Studios. This is why Graham Norton's salary for his talk show is £3 million as it is commercial money paying it, and NOT licence fee money.
What a waste of money!! They DIDN'T need the new set did they?
You obviously didn't watch it.
@@MsPinkwolf Why would I watch it recently? It used to be better than what it is now
@@juniourst3ven596 sorry. I didn't realise it was all about you.
@@MsPinkwolf Well, it's all about the BBC
You obviously didn't watch this clip did you? The explained the reason for needing a new set.
cost £93million from YOUR license fee money.
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back.
Eastenders is far too shouty and depressing tbh
Copyright copyright infringement copyright copyright violation copyright copyright ©
Well over 86 million and for what? Improve the sets yes but this money is a ridiculous amount for a overall failing show.
The show isn’t failing at all to be honest.
What a waste of big sum of money of the taxpayers when you can’t even tell the difference. They should just have stuck it out on the old set considering the flop in ratings now! 🙄
You're not supposed to tell the difference. the old set was was deteriating which is why they rebuilt it.
@@Becksnnc It didn't need to cost £87 million. Absolutely disgusting waste of other people's money.
I need to clarify this - that £87 million is actually being funded from the commercial arm of the BBC - BBC Studios. Eastenders is produced by BBC Studios, and they use their commercially generated financial revenue to fund that £87 million
@@johnking5174 This information is interesting for these reasons: 1) It maybe BBC Studios who makes EE but they’re budget is allocated to them by BBC Head of Programs that comes from taxpayers licence fees. 2) the fact that BBC ‘s commercial arm BBC studio make stuff to sell overseas means that BBC actually makes money out of the produced stuff made by BBC Studios means that it proves that BBC can make their own revenues and become independent by being commercial & enterprising. So all they need to do is reinvest into the BBC by making programs they want to make without a) annoying their current employers ie the public and be accused of wasting taxpayers money. b) pay however much salary they want to pay their thousands of employees without having to justify it to the angry public.
So bottom line is that BBC can obviously be an independent company on its own without having to force and imprison anyone who do not want to pay a money pit draconian institution! It’s the 21st century already in case the greedy BBC refuse to acknowledge that there are other platforms that exist in the real world. BBC model is from the past and has no place in the current digital world of entertainment!
@@chijavier1869 Hi. I can clarify that the commercial arm of the BBC has been there since the 1950s when the then conservative government felt the BBC could supplement their income from the licence fee by commercial means. Please remember, it is supplementing their licence fee. Now BBC Studios generally reports a profit of around £200 million a year. Bare in mind this is profit, and NOT the commonly reported £1 billion annual revenue. A lot of people confuse revenue with profit. That £200 million is given back to the main BBC. The licence fee is designed to cover the funding of programming that other commercial broadcasters would simply never touch. Production of religious programming. Coverage of parliament. Unprofitable documentaries. Kids programmes.
What a waste of money
Disgusting amount of tax payers money £87 million just to replicate a set which is almost exactly the same. The show isn’t what it was in the 80s and 90s.
Cry about it
Tax payers? What you on about?
It's license fee money. Don't pay it if you don't want it
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back
It's not tax payers money, it's the gullible people's money who pay the TV licence's money!
Do people still watch this crap
New set same propaganda BS.
Seems a waste of money on a show that's losing viewers.
Losing viewers but has 20% audience share which is quite something in this day and age.
Even if Eastenders gets cancelled in 10 years time it'll still work out cheaper than filling the 7:30pm slot four nights a week with new content.
It has stopped losing viewers, so keep up👏👏
Eastenders does not rely on overnight audience viewers anymore. Millions watch it on demand on the BBC iPlayer. In fact a typical episode of Eastenders might get 3.5 million overnight viewers, but within a week that episode would rocket up to 6 million after BBC iPlayer views.
What a disgusting waste of other people's money. £87 million on a show that's had its best days . Just goes to show that it's easy to waste other people's money.
I need to clarify this - that £87 million is actually being funded from the commercial arm of the BBC - BBC Studios. Eastenders is produced by BBC Studios, and they use their commercially generated financial revenue to fund that £87 million.
This was just waste of tax payers money
Lol. Tv license is voluntary. It's not a tax.
@@MsPinkwolf Yeah, that's why they bully and harass the elderly.
It did not cost the licence fee payers a single penny. The money will be financed through BBC Studios, the commercial arm of the BBC who produce Eastenders for BBC One. Eastenders is sold internationally, and through those commercial sales, the £85 million is brought back
@@MsPinkwolf it's not voluntary it's a legal requirement
@@stevek6432 only if you have a tv. Your choice.
shame they didn't wipe over that ridiculous woke painting of a random person.
Stopped watching when it went all woke. Not seen an episode in 8 months. Haven't missed it.
Define woke
So 8 months ago it went woke, i will mark it in my diary! Fed up with people saying things have gone woke, but no one actually explains what they mean. From what I can work out, it usually means they dont like seeing non white people and non straight people. Basically I guess they are saying they are bigoted and only want to see white heterosexuality on tv and nothing else! Or perhaps they are not happy there is not enough racism, sexism and homophobia shown to please their bigoted appetites. All I can say is, the "anti-woke" brigade are the biggest moaners and snowflakes going and to need to grow up! "ooooh theres a black person, im scared", "ooooh theres a man kissing a man, disgusting", "ooooh theres a woman in charge of her self, get back in the kitchen!"
Copyright copyright infringement copyright copyright violation copyright copyright ©