Neil displayed an embarassingly grotesque unscientific attitude in this interview. To think that he is as Astrophycicist and finds the possibility of alien visitation exceedingly boring is amazing. "Call me when you talk to the aliens.." he should be ashamed of himself.
@@ishwarkshirsagar6793 It's simple. UFO doesn't mean aliens. Alright? It can be a drone, a Russian spy flying object or it can mean anything. But it doesn't necessarily mean aliens or lives from outside the earth. Alright?
@@chingo3387 And just because of that, you jumped to conclusion that it's alien spaceship? 😂 Come on bro As long as it's not proven, it can be anything. Yeah it's advanced af but still can be anything.
It's like in almost every religion: The religious UFO fundamentalist attack everyone who doubts their religion. Rationality doesn't mean anything to them.
We are the most intelligent form of life in our known solar system, in our known Galaxy, which is a very big deal.. Think of our ancestors and how limited their understanding of the world was, think of how they struggled to survive because they lacked what later Homosapiens have developed all these hundreds of thousands of years later. Big brains got us to where we are today. Its why we have the medicine to extend our own lives well beyond the normal life-expectancy from even a hundred years ago. We've been to our moon, we've launched satellites into space, we've explored a small portion of our deepest Oceans, and we continue to learn, understand and develop new theories about how the Universe works. I'd say that's pretty intelligent, it may not be what other Civilizations somewhere in the cosmos have achieved in comparison (granted they've had several millions of years to develop compared to us) but I think its a good start.
I think it is a proper scientific response to stay close to the actual evidence, the phenomenon itself, before we claim that we understand it all. It's certainly better than coming off like you know everything and expect people to nod their heads in agreement because you wear a white coat. I think what he is trying to say, however awkwardly, is that he not only doesn't know what UFOs are, he doesn't know how to go about investigating them. He does know how to investigate other phenomena, so he prefers to study those things, not UFOs. He said more than once that he has no problem with other people studying UFOs. It's unfortunate that he clowns it up so much. He sounds like he dismisses the whole phenomenon as a joke. I don't think he is. If he's got a message here it's "Let's not get ahead of ourselves and over-interpret what these observations mean." I have no problem with that.
Actually every scientist ever. This means that I get to investigate this phenomenon, that none of us can describe. Maybe I have a chance to discover a phenomenon nobody else knows about. I could be the next Einstein, or the next Feynman.
What about the Oregon sighting where five guys ( cops) saw a giant ship moving slow over the town. How much more credible can you get that something strange is happening in our skies.
The government shows a moon landing video. Conspiracy theorists: It's a fake! The government lies! The government shows an unidentified flying object video. Conspiracy theorists: Aliens exist! Government confirmed that!
@@reyalexandro Neil is probably a disinformation agent. It's obviously working, look how many smartasses think UFO can mean anything if it's not identified, but everyone knows it means alien spacecraft.
He understands that this craft, to him, functions as though it is either a God or under the control of a God. He’s a narcissist but it’s hard to fill that self against such an almighty craft and piece of technology. Okay, so. He elaborated when he suggests “he’s not allowed to go outside the cosmos”.. either this is a subtle Freudian slip suggesting he can’t really dismiss or otherwise criticize something beyond his realm of understanding - or literally, he can’t.
"The UFO phenomena is there to remind us of what we don't know, its there to humble us, to shake our faith about our perception of Science." - Terrence McKenna
The truth? The truth is that no one knows. The truth is that their is no concrete physical evidence of Aliens, we haven't found anything, we haven't dissected any alien corpses (despite what Area 51 conspiracy nutjobs believe) and we haven't recovered any crafts of any kind. The Scientific community remains "skeptical" because its not prudent to believe everything you see, despite what others choose to believe. If someone says "UFO," its just another unfounded, bizarre, often ridiculous story about some sort of "alien visit" that would be the equivalent of telling a spooky story over a campfire. In the end, you need something more interesting then anecdotal evidence to support your theories, you need some actual proof, you need collateral in a way. If I told you that two days ago, an alien appeared at my house, showed me a vision of the future and how we should all stop buying Pepsi or we're all going die, would you believe it? I think its more skeptical to insult the intelligence of rather brilliant people that have designed such advanced technology that we accidentally perceive these contraptions as being "from another world" on occasion.
@@swahiliranger1022 How are you so certain that nobody knows? How do you know an alien corpse has never been dissected? How do you know nothing has been found? There's a lot of credible people who say different. I dont pretend to know either way but it sure seems like something has been going on for a long time.
swahili ranger but you sure sound like you know lol where did you get your PhD?and what are your credentials? Experience? Expertise?...or just a opinion?
@@swahiliranger1022 I hate to break it to you, but you don't have a clue about this subject matter. The evidence is overwhelming, but I won't get into that. What all I will say is this video alone, when analyzed properly, is enough to formulate a conclusion that this is technology beyond our wildest dreams. I recommend you listen to LT. David Frevor, Luis Elizondo, Bob Lazar and Jeremy Corbell on these objects capabilities.
that's what i noticed too , he didn't want to engage at all about the object or the tremendous speeds it was doing or the fact the people identifying it are skilled military personnel who kind of know their shit tbh , he just spent his time joking and coming across as pretty dumb i'm afraid.. :(
Neil deGrasse : " it's a flying object and we don't know what it is" 1:42 😂 - Nervous as Hell Bob Lazar : it's a flying object and i have already told people what it is
@@Haveablessedday820 really? Lazar converted his car to run on hydrogen. Also worked at top aero space facilities. So exactly what did DeGrasse do apart from talking a lot?
No, he says exactly nobody knows what is and you can speculate but it is worth nothing. Knowledge and speculation are 2 different things. You need data. The data is very poor here
Well, when knowledge fails, the imagination has to take over and theorize. Apparently most of the naysayers here have zero ability to think outside the box.
The investigators at the DOD have the data. And they're virtually concluding that it isn't manmade. If it's not manmade the alien hypothesis makes logical sense. Why resist this with pompous stubbornness? This theory can be rescinded if later shown to be wrong.
@@shepherdbook8783 Well I lost my part of my family to not visiting me after an demonic attack that the late Lorraine Warren (author of Amityville Horror knew about because I was a walking atheist, I was like a werewolf, face changed too and realized that the Holy Bible is real and not only real it burnt like crazy.
@@shepherdbook8783 God is real and I could tell what was blessed and wasn't. I tell you this..they hate us a million fold. Two the Catholic Church has the realm of the Holy Spirit surrounding each and every one of them.
Imagine an undiscovered tribe in the Amazon, back in the fifties, watching an airplane fly over for the first time ever, and the tribesmen who saw it, asking the smartest man in the tribe to explain it to them. And, then imagine what he would have probably told them. That's our scientists today trying to explain these UAPs.
@@ralphholiman7401 the story really happened though.. www.messynessychic.com/2019/02/14/somewhere-on-a-remote-volcanic-island-american-soldiers-are-worshipped-like-gods/
He may be a NASA or Pentagon "puppet" just like Carl Sagan. Governments are well aware that these "UFO's" have been visiting us for decades. But now, with the internet, video recorders on cell phones and people buying high-powered telescopes and software, how much longer can they keep this from the world's populations? If you believe that we are the only intelligent life ANYWHERE, than you needs to go back home to your cave. It's impossible, that we're the only planet that hit the jackpot.
There is no such thing as an expert of interplanetary space travel especially from Earth to Mars - they haven't done it. Who could definitively explain extra terrestrial life or their Earth visiting intentions?
@Yesmer They can totally say they did it for us. The Orson wells radio hoax was a test to gauge peoples reactions to hearing about aliens and the possibility of invasion.
Oh you silly conspiracy theorists, the earth is flat, and "space" isn't what they teach us. There can be no "aliens". Also, Jesus never mentioned them, and he wrote the Bibble! Answer THAT and stay fashionable, smarty trousers!
@@Bhatt_Hole Come to threads like this so you can feel superior to people huh? The sad thing is, you are still a loser. Noone said flat earth. We said the government is lying. Grab a twinky, food never makes fun of you.
A good scientist should be skeptical, not overtly dismissive. He says he is "cool with not knowing"- which is fine, as scientists need to feel comfortable with "not knowing" and suspending judgment/conclusions all the time. But why doesn't this make him curious??? We know 22M is nothing considering the DOD budget- it's the fact that the DOD is acknowledging the event.
Před 4 lety
he's insincere , or he doesn't know shit about warp drive physics.
To me this guy's know what they are up to... How on earth can the most brilliant minds spend much their efforts trying to convince us not not look at the broader picture?
@@Dr.Cosmar Aye....Scientists are the *MOST* uncomfortable not knowing why/how/what something is....thats uh...thats what drives most of scientific study.
@@rpscorp9457 I see your point for sure, that's relatable when I look at the state of oceanic discovery. I feel fear, and I'm not even the one down there. Discomfort is secondary almost lol. I do have to ask though, isn't the point of being a scientists to attempt an explaination of the unknown with science? It seems rather silly to choose a proffesion where you would have to face a personal discomfort reluctantly, especially if you are sensitive to that. I wouldn't think just being a scientists somehow aligns you to be uncomfortable approaching the unknown, you ARE given the tools to do so. Unless you staked your life on assuring everyone you know everything (which isn't ok, as a trusted academic professional we rely on them to be prove their assertions, if no one is proving something with pier review they shouldn't be acknowledged). Of course, if you have no discomfort (of the unknown) or if you are prepared to face it (for one reason or another), Then you wouldn't have a problem rolling up your sleeves and hitting the blackboard. I would also like to point out how much fear (similar to "discomfort) has pushed back scientific progress before. In my own opinion, if you are scared too unformfortable to attempt an explanation, you should not be an academic voice of reason. Subject matter at hand, it's unreasonable to accept an extraterrestrial origin of any UFO(unidentified is kinda it's schtick). That's a given, it would be assuming way to much, and scientific discover is not based on assumption ( at least GOOD scientific discovery). To assume it's not ET would be equally falice. Because, in support of that, no nation has stepped forward and claimed it as their own, there is so little we know about our universe, and 65% of the earth remains unexplored. It is alien (Oxford definition) for sure, top secret maybe, staring at the video is not going to help much though. However, this shouldn't be dismissed. The world wants to know "just what the hell goes on in the vast sky above?". I think the first steps to that; stop being dismissive...figure out where it was going, what might be a destination, where it could have started at, gleam all the information you can, do real science work before we discuss something no one will ever possibly know without the object and potential passenger directly in front of you on a tarmac. Sorry, I talk a lot buddy, if you read all that, thank you and let me know what you think. EDITs: Grammar, punctuations, don't know why I kept running with "fear", but it was easily exchangable without compromising the integrity of my comment.
@@Dr.Cosmar Youre in the right direction. Until we have star trek-like scanners though, i dont think we are ever going to learn anything. Plus, who knows what the pentagon has in its investigations. What they release is only the bare minimum. If an independent science organization makes a groundbreaking discovery in any number of fields, its usually immediately classified by the parent government anyway.
@Jon Doe if it's emitting no heat signature how is it showing on FLIR? Also, FLIR doesn't measure velocity. All its telling you is its _angular_ velocity, which could be a fast object far away, or a slow object close by.
@Jon Doe You obviously have no idea how an ATFLIR targeting pod tracks contacts. You've made up your mind that this is Xenu from Blargglar and are building everything from that presumption.
@Jon DoeThere's nothing suggesting that this has to be anything extraterrestrial, but you want to believe so bad that you're willing to fool yourself by presuming that it is
Correct. he is not authorized, because he is federal government scientist... & NASA has been lying, hiding, & discreetly avoiding UFOLOGY from public consumption......mortally afraid of possible consequences, if US DEFENCE forces take on UFO'S who seem to have technology way ahead of our own.
Why is Neil so evasive about this? The implications of this are tremendous in the science community. If there is no apparent thrust from these vehicles then how are they propelling themselves? What physics describes how the vehicle is being propelled? Surely these vehicles are not using Tesla batteries. Therefore, what energy source are they using? The answers to these questions could change the course of humankind and Neil seems disinterested and wants to leave those kinds of questions to the military to research? Neils response was about as alien as what he was talking about. Sure hope others pressure him and other scientists to give more scientific responses to what is being seen in the video and explain how much money and effort the scientific community are spending on acquiring this technology? Fossil fuels could be a thing of the past as well as man-made climate change.
@joseph orste, the fact that the pentagon spent $22 mils over 7 years to do research on this, it means they taking this very seriously!! and so should the scientific community.
Joseph Oreste I agree. Here is a short excerpt of an interview with Luis Elizondo, a former CIA officer who headed The Advanced Aerospace Identification Program at the Pentagon. "In my opinion, if this was a court of law, we have reached the point of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. I hate to use the term UFO, but that’s what we’re looking at,” Mr Elizondo told The Telegraph. “I think it’s pretty clear this is not us, and it’s not anyone else, so one has to ask the question where they’re from.” Mr Elizondo told the newspaper there were geographical “hot spots” - sometimes around nuclear facilities and power plants - which emerged during AATIP’s investigations, as well as common factors between UFO sightings. He said: “It was enough where we began to see trends and similarities in incidents. There were very distinct observables. Extreme manoeuvrability, hypersonic velocity without a sonic boom, speeds of 7,000mph to 8,000mph, no flight surfaces on the objects. A lot of this is backed with radar signal data, gun camera footage from aircraft, multiple witnesses.
bighands69 i guess you’ve figured it out partially as well, that its actually not them moving, which does explain their energy source, why they have little to no friction, and how they can pass speed of light easily. Even with a gravity engine tho, they can still hit stuff so that can cause accidents. Or the engine can overload and destroy itself.
Neil is just being cautious, but you have to ask, "what flies 15,000 mph?" it buzzed away, it jammed the F18's radar, it was 40+ feet long, Oh and did I mention it flew away at 15,000 mph without burning up in earth's atmosphere. I'd like to sit down with Neil and SHOW him the evidence, Neil would change his mind.
the Navy and other countries' Navies have tracked with cutting edge solid state radar and other satellites and sensor data these nonhuman in origin craft going over 280,000 MPH, and doing perfet 90 degree turns & instant stop/starts at over 46,000MPH or way more, and with no noise, no heat signatures, & can go from orbital space to 0 ft above the ocean in less than 0.78 of a second, and can go deep underwater at faster than the speed of sound. Even the former head of the French spy agency said they're being recorded going the speed of sound or faster underwater, and that's just the tip of the tip of the iceberg for the latest high level admissions from all over...the Navy is tracking 10,000 or more of them per day just around US waters alone...absolutely 1 trillion % fucking nonhuman in origin..and that doesn't even include the millions per yr of civilians and govt/military personel saying they've definitely been abducted or manipulated/contacted/had contact experiences with nonhuman entities...just barely scratching the surface of what's going on here..and don't forget about the millions per year globally who go missing without any trace and a big % of those have absolutely no scientifically plausible explanation at all for their disappearances...
Isn’t this the same guy who claims curiosity to be one of the main driving forces of the scientific process? And yet he doesn’t seem too interested in confirmed objects that defy our common understanding of physics.
He said he was happy the Pentagon is investigating it. That shows curiosity right there. That he doesn't want to investigate it personally doesn't mean he lacks curiosity. One can only take on so many projects in a lifetime. You have to choose the ones that interest you most. He's likely not trying to learn bassoon or find the city of Atlantis either.
Před 4 lety+4
According to 2 long time government theoretical physicists who worked on directed energy weapons and advanced propulsion for decades, the physics are understood now, and no new physics are required to understand it. It's permissible under general relativity, and they are trying to get their theory good enough to build one. They're Eric Davis and Hal Puthoff. They currently work with Elizondo and To the Stars Academy and worked with NIDS and government agencies. Why the networks keep calling in idiots to act as experts on this, , well it's beyond stupid. Tyson's performance showed he didn't do any homework.
Bill Katakis Eric Davis and Hal Puthoff should have been the ones interviewed for this. But the press only goes to the celebrity mouthpieces in science. I know all about these guys and their study on this subject. Your comment should draw a hundred thumbs ups. This is baffling that the serious comments aren’t acknowledged here.
Benji exactly, imagine seeing a flying saucer right in front of your face and you're convinced it's an alien. In reality there are many possibilities as to what it can be and an alien is the least likely. The only reason you think that the ufo has aliens inside is because of Hollywood and such.
@@realkushman That's not the point, he does not say we need to invesigate what they are, alien or not! In fact he says he's alright withouth knowing nothing about it, wich it's ridiculous...
I love how a flying ship breaking all our laws of physics isn’t alien. Then what will it be? We none of us no country knows how to make something to break the sound barrier without a sonic bomb
How does he not even talk AT ALL about the video? All he does is say oh I don't know, that's not my business, let someone else look into it. Does this guy not know about physics to talk about how the object is rotating and flying?
MegaMattjb I know right he totally proves that he is not that person who wants to be in the forefront of science. - He’s like you go research that shit and then when it’s all facts i’ll make a TV-show about it. He’s def not up there with Einstein or Tesla. He knows it so he’s a entertainer.
Best part is "they don't come for fuzzy videos, they'll do something that everyone will notice" As camera quality improves, those videos become less and less and the remaining are still blurry.
I'll tell you why. It's taboo in his social/academic circles and if he were to take this seriously, there goes his grants for research or another invitation to host a television series like Cosmos. That's why.
@@silversurfer4441 You're probably more right than you know about that. I mean, look what happened to Bob Lazar when he spoke out. His Academic record is all but erased and they threatened to murder him.
@@SniffHeinkel, ETV illustrator, Mark McCandlish, also told of someone who'd successfully made an Anti - gravity device and he and his audience were severely told by the military and/or a govt. agency rep. to destroy all evidence of it, not to speak of it and forget about the whole thing!!!
You don't respect him, not because he doesn't immediately validate the existence of aliens, but because similar to Bill Nye, Tyson's political opinions contradict yours. Don't worry, thankfully he doesn't need your approval to continue his work.
While I respect Mr. Tyson's viewpoint & skepticism, I don't like the way he conveniently dismisses the phenomenon. To hear him say he's not interested, that's a bit disappointing. Not sure if he's just caught up in the moment or not but it's not something I can cosign.
He knows he can't know the answer, and he knows that there's a really high chance that we'll never know the answer. To give it an answer for conveniences sake is no better than accepting your own ignorance. Sometimes, the answer that we don't know is far better than substituting something we think we know in there. Also, honestly, the phenomenon might just be that humans like to blame the unexplained on...something that we can't prove exists one way or the other. I mean, isn't that weird, that so many people can just accept that this is aliens, something we don't conclusively know exists at all? I say that's weird, when I think about it, it's the exact same thing Religious people have done for millennia, blame something that we can't explain on God, something we can't conclusively know exists at all as well...maybe it's not even a phenomena, just something we humans have done and always will do. Just need a different name for the blank to blame it on. Edit: I should make clear, we might one day know conclusively that aliens exist. We won't know that aliens were the cause of the UFO in this video. That's what we don't understand.
Teh Architek Unfortunately he's not just caught up in the moment. He gives this answer all the time on this subject.The guy from the DOD program said this is not technology of this world so whose is it? It deserves more than a casual dismissal. You would think he would be a more reasonable guy but it's like he doesn't want to hear about it at all.
The lack of interest is the nail on the head. Sure we don't know what it is, but arent scientists supposed to be interested? Take dark matter, very very interesting for many scientists although it has never been seen and possibly doesn't even exist. UFOs on the other hand have been spotted and do exist obviously (whatever they are) yet most scientists just ignore them.
You are completely missing his point. Its called the argument from ignorance. He's not saying it is or isnt, hes stating that we dont know, therefore we can speculate, and to do so is an argument from ignorance. Another form of this is "the god of the gaps" which states that when we dont know something, people insert god as the answer; its the same thing with UFO's, we dont know, therefore it must be aliens. Thats not how it works. It works as the following: You see an object and you dont know what it is, so you hypothesize that it could be aliens. That is where most people stop, but dont realize that "its aliens" is a hypothesis, and now you must collect evidence to prove its an alien. That is what Neil is talking about, you cant just say "I dont know what that is, it must be aliens", it doesnt work that way.
@@smashexentertainment676 I only have my cell phone. Im just a regular person. However I am a Christian with A few spiritual gifts but I recently discovered I can contact UFOS. Or When I pray to God he allows me to see them.
@@MrTonyMeadows ahahaha, nice) Btw, UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object. That could be a bird, a frisbee, a missile, a drone, a spacecraft, pterodactyl etc.
@Wayne Gale Where did you get those numbers from? From the videos, it doesn't seem like they were hovering in mid-air and then speeding up to those speeds. If we're using logic and reason, I believe that broken equipment or a more common phenomenon to be more likely than a highly advanced alien civilization that we haven't heard from. I believe that it would still more likely to be a natural phenomenon that's not identified, rather than aliens, even if the natural phenomenon was unheard of. The premises for the unheard natural phenomenon would just be that the phenomenon appears under conditions that are rare and that those conditions are met. For aliens, you would need an exoplanet that supports life, life to thrive on said planet, life to develop intelligence on said planet, and life to develop space travel, that life not sending us any signals of their existence, civilization not dying out, all while flying in the airspace of our planet for unknown reasons. Occam's Razor would suggest that the natural phenomenon would be more likely to be true, than the assumption that aliens exist. Because it's an unidentified object, we cannot even say if it has mass or not. For all we know, it might just be a reflection of light. Because we can't tell what it is, we would need irrefutable evidence of aliens existing in order to assume that it could be of alien origin. Because we can come up with other explanations for the UFO, we can't just assume it's aliens. Even once we have proven that aliens do exist, we cannot simply state that the UFO is of alien origin. However, now we can consider it as a viable option among the others.
@Build a Reef Aquatics TLDR: The information in the video is not from a reliable source. I do not believe that the video you linked is from a reliable source. Looking at what the channel has posted in the past, they seem to rely on clickbait a lot, with the common theme being the idea that a single video could change your life into a successful one. Recently, they seem to have focused more on conspiracy theories. While clickbait may not necessarily be an indication of lying, it is still a scummy practice. Using clickbait on a video that is trying to talk about real information is not the best idea, as it gives off the impression that without the clickbait they wouldn't get as many views. If the message in the video was truly as important as they claim, you wouldn't need to have to promote it that way. Dr. Steven Greer appears to have been a real physicist, though he is currently retired. In that sense, his views could be considered to have some credibility as he has worked in the field. However, we can't say that they are superior to the scientific consensus as a whole. On his website, he lists a few of the experiments on new energy. I will only be taking into account the "Kowsky-Frost Experiment" as that seems to have demonstrated the nullified mass property. The PDF file which discusses the K-F Experiment mentions that it was from keelynet.com with the site owner's permission. However, based on a WhoIs lookup, we cannot check what kind of site keelynet.com was, as the site is set to reject any requests to access it. The University of Pennsylvania has archived multiple years of the Science and Innovation magazine, which allows us to conclude that the experiment shown is the same as the one in the archived versions of the article. However, now we face a problem. Dr. Greer stated that the PDF file was the scientific paper for the K-F experiment, but it was just an article discussing the experiment. It was not written by the original authors of the experiment, but it's a paraphrased version of the text. For the sake of the argument, let's give it more credibility by assuming that it is a perfectly translated version of the one released by Radio Umschau, rather than a translated paraphrased version of a paraphrased version. This still doesn't help Dr. Greer's case, as we've proven that he has misinformed us, but we could still continue and doubt the credibility of the article further. As a source, the article mentions Radio Umschau as a reliable source. However, they are referring to an article released on the first of April. The implication of the date should make you doubt anything you read or hear from that date, as jokes and hoaxes are often put among the reliable information. Comparing it to the rest of the articles in the "Science and Innovation" -magazine, the K-F experiment doesn't mention any names. While the magazine does have articles that don't mention who wrote the article, all of the articles related to discovery or invention made by someone mention the full names of the people involved. For the K-F experiment, the discoverers of the phenomenon are just referred to as "Dr. Kowsky and Engineer Frost". From the lack of information, we can't really figure out who these people were or if their results are true. The only way for us to confirm the experiment would be to perform it ourselves. However, we do not have access to the paper. Merely a paraphrased version of it. The results of that are mentioned do not state that the quartz block became massless. They only refer to the block having negative weight and that the current made it counteract the force of gravity. When you measure the weight of an object, you're actually measuring the force of gravity that acts on the object. The force of gravity acting on it is the standard gravity times the mass of the object when on earth as according to Newton's second law. The scale measures the strength of that force and tells you the weight of the object. The scale will give you a completely different answer if you went on a different planet. Your weight might decrease or increase depending on the force of gravity, but your mass would remain constant. Even if you were to experience no gravitational force, you would still have mass. Using Newton's second law, we can say that in order for the Quartz block to float, the total amount of force acting upon the block has to be zero vertically. That can be achieved by applying a force that is equal to the gravitational force, but in the opposite direction to it. Increase that force, and the object goes up. Decrease it and it goes down. The article doesn't mention if it is indeed the mass that's being decreased, or if the force of gravity is simply nullified by another force. What Dr. Greer has given us on the topic is information that is dubious at best. Not only that, but the channel that the video was uploaded on seems to use clickbait a lot and make videos disclosing the secrets behind success and how anyone can gain wealth easily, or how certain frequencies have peculiar properties.
This scientist is talking in riddles and when the interviewer tried to ask him direct questions about aliens, he tried every way to avoid answering by using humour to make light of it or directing the conversation onto a different question.
science explainer and fool, we are far ahead of his crap. theres more then enough evidence..he is too far behind if this is how he thinks what a fool lost a fan ..sad day.he doesn't even care about objects speed or characteristics some kind of scientist...... WTF.
He’s bullshitting He’s only saying what they allow him to say in front of the public. He’s a scientist.. you damn well he’s been believing since he was a child.
lmfao the same person who belive in evolution and that humans came from f is and everything came from nothing 14 billion years ok lmfao dosent belive in aliens oh there's no proof for aliens exsists such i don't think there is but says there's proof for something that happend 14 billion years ago lmfao no there's not proof for that neil
I mean UFO doesn't instantly mean alien spacecraft but in the footage presented I don't think there are many things of this earth that can be compared to it. All we can do is theorise and for now "Aliens" might be the most relevant explanation.
Plus it matches up with earlier accounts that have been witnessed and recorded countless times before (these accounts go as far back as the earliest recorded history by the way). I don't think we have had anything close to that capability except for maybe the last 50 years or so. In retrospect it becomes the most plausible answer because the alternatives become ever increasingly stranger. Personally once you accept it it's not really that big of a deal anymore and I don't get why skeptics would rather believe anything but alien spacecraft. It's like as long as it's a naturalistic explanation (whether it makes sense or not) they automatically just accept that as the default. I've literally seen them take the explanation of these being just birds as a rational option, as if an experienced Navy pilot would ever make that mistake. As if a veteran Navy pilot has never seen such a thing while flying before. Bring this up and they shut you out like any other person they actually know how to debunk properly. Most of the time they are right, but confront them with something they cannot explain and they become exactly like the true believers they argue with. The modern skeptical method is sound for the most part, but it also has its own flawed and biased reasoning in some circumstances. They all know our knowledge is far from complete, yet still take everything modern physics says as holy writ. It's incredibly close minded and hypocritical in my opinion.
Exactly! And it’s totally normal to speculate “alien” for now; it’s totally human. But this seems to offend scientists even if we admit that we’re postulating and aren’t concluding that what’s observed “must be” alien.
@@DeathBYDesign666 You really trust the accounts of desert dwelling goat herders and literal primordial colonies of ancient civilizations? Why? What do you think they knew back then that we don't know now? Their are people who actually believe ALIENS built the pyramids of Giza, but that's not true (turns out it was the Egyptians the whole time). You think the ancient Mayans ACTUALLY saw UFO's? How about comets, eclipses, strange phenomena in the sky that they couldn't explain. They didn't understand what they were looking at, and even more to point every Civilization made mock-ups or caricatures whenever they met other races, so who knows? Maybe those who journeyed across the ocean looking all crazy weird and different from the Mayans themselves were the ones they were referencing.
@@swahiliranger1022 No I don't necessarily trust their accounts at face value actually, but I think there's more than enough evidence to know that they could tell the difference between stellar phenomenon and flying craft. Columbus also allegedly saw these things in the middle of the ocean and he navigated by the stars. I myself have also seen objects that defy all known laws of aerodynamics and modern technological capabilities. On their own they don't add up to much, but when you put them all together a pattern starts to emerge. I'm not a huge advocate of the subject either, but I do believe there is a bit more there than most skeptics will acknowledge. I think it's a bit more foolish to just dismiss it out of hand, it's not like we know all there is to know enough to do so.
I really liked Neil but this is face palm worthy. The news anchors are trying to have a serious discussion about whats going on and the science guy they bring on just clowns around every step of the way. I m sorry but he needs to get a clue.
David Whitenack What he’s saying is we can’t jump to a conclusion, we have to use the scientific method before proving it a fact. And we can’t do with minutes of footage
Jesse Music Here is a short excerpt of an interview with Luis Elizondo, a former CIA officer who headed The Advanced Aerospace Identification Program at the Pentagon. "In my opinion, if this was a court of law, we have reached the point of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. I hate to use the term UFO, but that’s what we’re looking at,” Mr Elizondo told The Telegraph. “I think it’s pretty clear this is not us, and it’s not anyone else, so one has to ask the question where they’re from.” Mr Elizondo told the newspaper there were geographical “hot spots” - sometimes around nuclear facilities and power plants - which emerged during AATIP’s investigations, as well as common factors between UFO sightings. He said: “It was enough where we began to see trends and similarities in incidents. There were very distinct observables. Extreme manoeuvrability, hypersonic velocity without a sonic boom, speeds of 7,000mph to 8,000mph, no flight surfaces on the objects. A lot of this is backed with radar signal data, gun camera footage from aircraft, multiple witnesses.
David Whitenack exactly... he's just another Bill Nye.. making jokes n being a dick when people are asking serious questions.. disinformation pawn. I used ta like him too and any type of phenomenon shit he's gotta clown around.
But that's the thing. This isn't a serious discussion. The whole idea is just drowned with pseudosciences, narcissistic bullshit, hysteria, and conspiracy that any seriousness that it may of had left ages ago. So I wouldn't blame poor Tyson for laughing so much, because the idea itself is riddle with unscientific bullshit and hysteria.
He is out of his league with everything. He is just a token intellectual. The media wanted a minority scientist and he just got lucky to be there when they needed one. I guarantee you that he ranks among the bottom as far as intelligent physicists.
The most important part of this segment, "Everyone has cameras on them now, but there are no more videos than there were before the cellphone"... paraphrasing from another interview he gave.
It could mean that the hypothetical aliens are being more cautious now and that somehow, they are able to see uploads to the internet to measure their...publicity.
@@ex0stasis72 if they were that smart then why haven’t they done anything considering the giant blow up of “publicity” recently. You’d think they’d be concerned if they can see what we’re saying.
@@Natureguy-le8pl Not to take this too seriously, but to further the thought experiment, I was referring to the “close encounter” reports from random people from decades ago. The hypothetical aliens may have stopped with the close encounters or have been doing a better job at covering up than before. This recent “publicity” is hypothetically of their air/space craft from far away and reportedly sighted everyday for years by the military. But they go ignored, so they continue doing what they’ve been doing.
Strange how Neil deGrasse Tyson seems to have so little interest in these unidentified aerial phenomena. You’d think as a professional he’d be fascinated and trying to figure out what these things are. But he says he is not interested.
Why can't he at least look into the 1000's of reports from people who have had experiences with intelligent. He won't it's his job to spread disinformation..that's his role.
@@adithyay328 That's the problem with society.. We are so quick to adhere to anything people throw in our faces. You are a puppet being led on a string. "Human testimony is an unreliable source of evidence in science". What phrase can be so conveniently worded to discredit anything anyone has to say about Alien life. You are quoting a man that does not have the authority (as he stated in an interview on a news show) to reveal anything about intelligent life. Your argument is baseless.
@@tyroneadams8706 I mean, it seems pretty simple to prove to me. An example: You ever watch a horror movie, then over-react and think that every small sound, every dark hallway is an indication of the thing you are afraid of being there? I know I have. It's your brain preemptively increasing the level of anxiety to protect you from threats in the near future. What I'm getting at is that the human brain is perfectly capable of, and does, modify what it perceives based on what it deems is important information. When a human reports ANY incident, what they saw or experienced is influenced both by what they actually perceived, AND their mental state, and other factors affecting their perception; how tired they were, etc. As well, humans skew what they perceived based on what they WANT to perceive. This is backed by a well known and proven psychological occurrence called "confirmation bias": humans tend to recall, interpret, or favor information that conforms with what they want to see and what their word view is. Of the people out there LOOKING FOR UFOs and aliens, the majority WANT to see a UFO. So when they see something that could, BUT MAY NOT BE A UFO, their brain will subconsciously skew what they saw to support their assertion. Then, later, when they recall the information, they subconsciously SKEW what they saw to support their claim, which makes their evidence useless to anyone. This is why I agree with his statement regarding the irrelevance of human testimony. Citations for the theories invoked: Anxiety as a response to perceived stressors: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181681/ Confirmation bias: psy2.ucsd.edu/~mckenzie/nickersonConfirmationBias.pdf
@@adithyay328 Well written, and I understand your argument, however, I cannot undertake dialogue with someone who believes we are alone in the universe. As Neil Degrasse stated, it would be unbelievably egotistical to think we are alone in the universe.
These sightings have been reported since cavemen times and are featured in cave art, legend and lore.. The cases most fascinating/believable are those which took place prior to mankind taking flight, before we had anything in the sky that we could confuse with something extraterrestrial!.
I myself have done extensive research including the baffling nuclear weapons connection with Robert Hastings, would you mind providing me some links on this cave art?
The universe is infinite therefore “aliens” must exist. It makes no sense that we are alone. Also most scientists base the universe off of our own knowledge. We literally know nothing about this universe.
He says this all the time. He believes aliens exist. The probability is pretty good. The problem is that we have NO EVIDENCE that they are close enough or intelligent enough to enter our atmosphere.
Alyssa I believe we get evidence all the time. I think a lot of what’s known about other life forms isn’t projected to the public. Maybe people wouldn’t know how to handle it. Or maybe they don’t want to be seen but rather observe us as we observe ants.
First of all. There are alot of fake videos on the Internet. Some of them look really real to make us believe. But you are kinda right. Every thing that is on this earth. Came from space. But there is no such a thing us aliens coming to us. Like comon ALL of the vidoes on the internet were filmed by one person. Not from other users that had to encounter them. I dont think aliens came to earth But aliens or other life does exist in any shape or form.
None is saying aliens don't exist, but you have to be realistic when thinking about aliens. 1. It's probable that if aliens do exist , that they are so far away from us that we would never detect them. 2. Humans have lived a blink of an eye in comparison to the universe, so in order for us to discover aliens , they must also live within that blink of eye (which would be highly unlikely)
He's a scientist, just trying to find the most reasonable explainable reason behind it and I get that. But to me, this at least points to technology that might be well beyond his or the rest of the scientific community's knowledge. To just laugh it off is kind of strange to me. I get not putting all your eggs in the aliens basket but geez Neil
@@aeropostale101nw That's not good enough based on what's been confirmed that these crafts are not … if they're not our earthly technology, as the AATIP investigators virtually concluded, then what many other explanations can they speculate about?
Yes guitar junkie, the guy is so arrogant he just baby talks to everyone else because he has such a superiority complex. Like the rest of us don’t know what the plain English words, “unidentified flying object” means
xAlerick: you must be the only one that understood him this way, it sounds like to everyone else that he is being completely dismissive and that he is implying that people are being deluded By ordinary phenomenon.
@@aeropostale101nw That's poor explanation for someone who should know something about theory of probability in context of cognitive issues. There is WAAAY bigger probability for someone want to hold that hoax (UFO) for money $$$, because majority od people live in fear of the unknown mixed with incompettence, and this topic making them super-duper noisy online/tv/radio/media. USA is a mother of marketing. They even changing definitions of concepts just for beeing spotted as "not-so-bad" so yeah. Congrats. Love when someone explaining me that #sunisshining, that #seasarewaving and have that excited face with huge eyeballs.
As a scientist, I wonder why he wouldn't be interested in a vehicle that can maneuver faster than any known man made vehicle at right angles with this being confirmed by government pilots? Unless... he is privy to some knowledge that we aren't. Maybe I should change the "known" to "publicly known".
You are completely missing his point. Its called the argument from ignorance. He's not saying it is or isnt, hes stating that we dont know, therefore we can speculate, and to do so is an argument from ignorance. Another form of this is "the god of the gaps" which states that when we dont know something, people insert god as the answer; its the same thing with UFO's, we dont know, therefore it must be aliens. Thats not how it works. It works as the following: You see an object and you dont know what it is, so you hypothesize that it could be aliens. That is where most people stop, but dont realize that "its aliens" is a hypothesis, and now you must collect evidence to prove its an alien. That is what Neil is talking about, you cant just say "I dont know what that is, it must be aliens", it doesnt work that way.
@@Mercplx Right!! The level of density I see in the comment section takes the crown from Osmium. Because someone says it's not Aliens he is a shill... even though he never denied it's Aliens he is just saying wtf is the likelihood of you seeing something you don't understand and it actually being an alien is ridiculously low. If you take a flashlight back a few hundred years they would think you are a wizard.. He is not a shill.. simply a scientist who will not accept anything without evidence that has been tested and proven through the scientific method.
@Mitch Swanson So a scientist.. is not jumping to conclusions about something he doesn't have enough information on.. So he is a shill right? Or he is simply using the scientific method to verify what he believes to be factual. Something he has been doing his whole life. He didn't deny aliens. He is quoted saying "It would be extremely arrogant to assume we are the only ones out there" Not verbatim but you get the idea. He is not a denier. Simply someone who needs evidence that's tested and proven before he makes a claim like "thats an alien craft" How does this not compute? I would love for it to be Aliens. How amazing would that be. We just can't claim that because we don't understand something therefore aliens. Its a flaw in human thinking going back to our origins.
neil degrasse tyson why son? A part of my inner scientist died today. As a astrophysicist you just played yourself. You chose laughs and giggles over a chance to introduce science and mathematics into a subject that rarely gets it in the public eye. Not cool
Před 4 lety+1
AMEN to that, , he shit on science with this interview.
Before you read on, everyone in this comment section is or has gone to Harvard, Yale, Columbia and Ivy league schools. Everyone has a phd in theoretical physics and knows everything about aliens. You can carry on now.
Steeb You don't have to go to Harvard to know this guy is full of shit . All he's doing is trying to down play the UFO enigma just like the government has been doing for the past 60 something years..Who are you , are you a UFO expert ?
I have an alien story when I was 12 my brother was at his friend house on Easter during eggs that same night I went to sleep at my house and had a dream about seeing flashing lights in the sky that could move really fast when my brother got home he told me that he saw what he and his friend thought was a ufo and explain what it was like the weird part was that it was exactly the same as the dream I had the same night.
All Neil does is regurgitate information he read and then acts like he found it. Also why couldnt this interview be informative? I thought he was a scientist not a comedian...
PickleNick - of course genders exist one produces babies and the other doesn’t right? Aliens and UFO’s are completely different. If there able to travel all the way to our galaxy and visit our planet don’t you think that they would be much more technologically advanced than us? Wouldn’t they cloak themselves to be invisible, only be seen as inferred objects or make themselves look like clouds or something completely unrecognizable to us so not to get our attention? How many people actually look to the sky for anything at all? They can be right above us at anytime and we would be oblivious to them. All of the skeptics are doing exactly what they want us to do - staying ignorant to there existence.
Kaizaro123 - just be observant to the facts that are out there Kaizaro 123. Over the years I have seen plenty of shows that state undisputed facts on this. I’ll list a few. 1) the structures on the moon and Mars alone. 2) The surveillance from the ISS and space shuttles showing Disc shaped craft leaving entering and orbiting earth. 3) Military surveillance of flying crafts entering and exiting the oceans at a tremendous speed. 4) Plus the mere fact that science has proved that there are trillions upon trillions of galaxies out there each galaxy containing billions of stars. 5) How can earth be the only ONE planet with intelligent life? 🤷♂️. That would make no sense right? Wouldn’t that be a huge waste of space for all of it to stay empty and void of life for eternity? 6) Nature is not just on planet earth the whole observable universe and beyond it is part of nature as well.
You are completely missing his point. Its called the argument from ignorance. He's not saying it is or isnt, hes stating that we dont know, therefore we can speculate, and to do so is an argument from ignorance. Another form of this is "the god of the gaps" which states that when we dont know something, people insert god as the answer; its the same thing with UFO's, we dont know, therefore it must be aliens. Thats not how it works. It works as the following: You see an object and you dont know what it is, so you hypothesize that it could be aliens. That is where most people stop, but dont realize that "its aliens" is a hypothesis, and now you must collect evidence to prove its an alien. That is what Neil is talking about, you cant just say "I dont know what that is, it must be aliens", it doesnt work that way.
He's right on how we can't make any conclusions on whether they're aliens or some random plasma balls generated by reasons beyond our knowledge. What he should be interested about, is the way how these objects move. The object can sit still in 120 knot wind (the audio in the original clip, material here: www.navair.navy.mil/foia/documents) and fly at ridiculous speed - unaerodynamically - against the wind, while turning in a very awkward way. Another video released by pentagon "FLIR" shows how the object escapes the locked camera - which should not happen. The object zips suddenly on the "bottom left corner" and returns immediately back where it was. Then it smoothly slides away from the lock of the camera. According to Cmdr. David Fravor (one of the witnessing pilots), told in his interview that the velocity of that object was beyond our present technology as far as he knows. As a cosmologist, Neil should be interested of the way how these objects maneuver. If you have ever seen one with your own two eyes, I can tell you, it looks as if "they're defying the laws of physics(as we know them)". It's a biggest jaw drop your life. I'm not the only one who has seen these things. Also, I'm not one of those cooks who think anything that moves in the sky is an "alien ufo". What comes to the "ufo videos" here on youtube. They're crap. The only reasonable ufo videos I've seen, are these three videos released by pentagon. The maneuvers seen in the FLIR video is something I've seen myself.
ALIENS as we bluster about them with characteristic nonchalance,...may actually be living with us for thousands of years now, given their superior capabilities....... NASA must be hiding away everything.........these scientists are vouched to secrecy.....
@@suryanarayanabegur2026 If we take a step back and think about what we really know about aliens, is that our knowledge is based on pop-culture (hollywood movies), some ambiguous people who claim to "channel" alien information and pictures of an alien autopsy which can't be proven true or false. It's just a picture. Then we have ancient cultures telling stories of strange beings, but that's not enough to tell there are aliens here on earth. In order to say the UFOs are aliens or that aliens have been (or are) here on earth, we need a lot more than what we have know.
Agreed. His total lack of curiosity confused me. He did not show up to discuss how this is an interesting sighting no matter what it is (atmospheric phenomena, foreign or domestic aircraft, little green men, etc.). He just laughed it off! Strange...
myself being a believer(saw a very large black triangle around 2007. ~400 ft. directly under it), has to conclude he knows something and somebody told him its an important secret. His overly dismissive attitude is kind of a tell that somethings is off. Could be wrong i suppose, but thats what it seems like
@@Hairysteed that is because they keep putting labels on something that only needs to be called a disk or a craft. The inter dimensional beings don’t give them names like linear space craft that’s what it is, it is a math term; it was made up by the ones in power
@@Hairysteed they only say unidentified because they couldn’t comprehend how things like that is flying around and need physical names and science to figure that out when all you have to except is, craft of the inter dimensional beings that is powered by white gold and platinum. They are also not always piloted by them. They can operated elsewhere as a probe. The white gold and platinum part, and the fact that they can also manipulate the air molecules around the craft the craft to zip through air pockets in the atmosphere, is why they don’t make any sound.
@@serenemountain6769 Continue to share the gospel of Christ. Here are the facts: The people perish because of ignorance/lack of knowledge. There have always been spiritual life before the creation of earth. The Creator God, His Word(Christ). His Holy Spirit. His innumerable angels. His heavenly creatures. His heavenly vehicles(cherubim). His saints,the 24 Elders. His warrior angels. His heavenly hosts. There are also "the fallen/satan and his angels(now called demons)who roam the lower heavens, the skies, the earth, under the earth, in the seas, and roaming also back and forth from the bodies of the wicked and ungodly humans, creating havoc, hate, abomination, chaos, evils, crimes, wars, etc on earth. The world is being presently ruled by the 6th kingdom(king, empire, world power). Rome was the 5th kingdom. After the 6th, comes the seventh kingdom. Who will rule the world next? The Antichrist will appear some time during the 7th kingdom(king,empire,world power) rulership. One day during the antichrist's rulership, Christ will return. We don't know specifically when, because Only God knows the exact date and time, but it is prophesied of Christ's imminent return. There are innumerable terrestrial beings out there, aka satan and his legions of demons. Some of the most realistic things are the things that cannot be seen. It is written, that "God did not give us a spirit of fear, but of Love, Power, and a Sound Mind." Fear is a tactic of satan(who is the temporary unofficial god of this earth, which he stole the ownership from Adam). However, there is One who is greater than all of satan and his minions combined. The Creator God, is Greater, Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and who will one day come in the clouds, with His innumerable heavenly hosts/warrior angels to rage war on satan, demons, sin, death, hell, and the grave. There are no such things as aliens, there will be no alien invasion, that's a fact. However, Christ is coming back to take what is rightfully His. Amen! No one will be able to prevent or stop Christ's imminent return. All weapons will be like toys against Him. No space force will be able to intercept Him. He will defeat all with just His words. If you can believe in aliens, who don't exist, then you can believe in what I just told you. If you have not accepted Christ as your Lord and Savior, you should while you still have time. USA is that present empire. When her reign is finally over, as predestined. The next king/kingdom/empire will arise. Who will reign as the next world super power? I don't know. We will see. Secure you future in Christ, the giver of eternal life, salvation, where there is no sorrow, no pain, no sickness, no disease, no wars, no hate, no death. Only Christ's Kingdom will rule on earth, as it is in heaven, for all eternity. in The New Earth there will be no suffering. Only Christ's Kingdom will be the only Kingdom that remains from everlasting to everlasting. When you have come to the Truth, share these words.
@@annmyann437 tl;dr but I've seen you said something about fallen angels... angles who rebelled agains omniscient and omnipotent god... ye... that makes perfect sense...
i think most people are shit scared to imagine this is actually for real. Is it? I have no clue. But from what the pilot and other credible people on this mission said, it could well be true.
He is clearly nervous. The unknown is no reason to joke. The object is there. It's real. It has no known propulsion system, it flies faster than any human machine. What's so funny about that? This is serious. Very serious.
There are thousands of sightings a year. Hundreds of videos. They exist. Maybe you're not looking for them. Or you're just dismissive of what you do come across.
@@AnunnakiAaron Nome of them are real and notice how there’s so many but no actual alien videos and plus aliens can’t get to earth is psychically impossible by laws of psychics.
3:25 have you ever tried to zoom your iPhone camera on something in the sky? A plane or a kite flying around? Fuzzy and shaky. It doesn't matter how good your phone camera is. There are plenty of crap phone videos of these phenomena.
Nah, he's just a useful idiot. The government did seem to have a hand in that in general though. For example, guess who once bought up a run-down regional newspaper and turned it into a national tabloid running *preposterous* articles related to the UFO phenomenon? Right, a CIA psychological warfare agent who renamed it The National Inquirer. And that is just instance of the government working to discredit the phenomenon. Internally (i.e. the military etc.) there is even more direct evidence than that.
"The government is paying him to make fun of UFOs" Of course. He is also on Reptilians and Illuminati payroll. There are rumours that Aliens are giving him a big amount of 24-carat gold they've harvested for him in Universe as well.
@@Julie.Canada Except the pilots who witnessed it first hand and filmed it...ofc the official report will remain PC and neutral...they don't want to create panic and seem utterly incapable against these things.
@@anthonyw9129 Hi Anthony....sorry please correct me if I’m wrong, but I think you’ll find that the jury’s still out on that point. We in the UFO community (if you want to call it that) are still waiting some sort of announcement from government possibly along the lines that the US is in possession of material ‘not made on this planet’ or words to that effect. Dr.Eric Davis may or may not be playing a part in this. So far Dec 2020 it still hasn’t come. There could well be a report from senate intel committee coming in 2021. I saw a saucer in the 7o’s so I KNOW there’s meat on the bones of all this...however as of now it is fair to say that the ‘Phil Larson declaration’ issued out by Obama/Biden administration in 2011 has not been overturned yet.
He isn’t not too afraid to look stupid or bending to social pressures; it’s called enacting proper skepticism. He’s not saying that there’s no alien carbon-based life out there; he’s merely waiting for independent confirmation of what these objects are...and that’s the correct thing to do
Don't know if its alien or not but realize the military is always 30-40 years ahead in technology then what the American public knows about. Just try Googling "Skunk Works" to see what I mean.
I would bet you a million dollars that if a real alien spacecraft were to be captured by 4K cameras up close then most people who'd see that footage would say "HAH!! That's the fakest bullshit I've ever seen in my life. There's no way that's real."
A mysterious aircraft does not equal evidence of a Alien though does it, tons of secret aircraft were worked on during the Cold War and we now know that US intellegence planted a few UFO stories to cover projects they worked on then, no reason to believe that doesn't happen today.
This is the perfect example of how social pressures hinder scientific progress.
The New Talker Guy, true. They’re too afraid to look stupid
Alien VS human predator
Or he doesn't commit the "argument from ignorance" logical fallacy.
100% correct. Bob Lazar is the real Scientist here.
Very well put
Disappointed Neil did not try to talk about the aerodynamics and physics of the object in the video.
Again the poor journalism askinkg the wrong questions...
This dude is the biggest science media mouthpiece Ive ever seen, he's so in deep state its not even funny hahaha
He is a SHILL... Isn't it obvious
Neil displayed an embarassingly grotesque unscientific attitude in this interview. To think that he is as Astrophycicist and finds the possibility of alien visitation exceedingly boring is amazing. "Call me when you talk to the aliens.." he should be ashamed of himself.
Exactly... this guy is truly an idiot
Anyone here after pentagon confirms the program? xD
yep
I am sharing this video to everyone who is sharing the ufo photo or video
@@ishwarkshirsagar6793
It's simple.
UFO doesn't mean aliens.
Alright?
It can be a drone, a Russian spy flying object or it can mean anything.
But it doesn't necessarily mean aliens or lives from outside the earth.
Alright?
@@norpriest521 the ufo was defying the laws of physics so a drone or a Russian spy flying object is out of the picture Alright?
@@chingo3387
And just because of that, you jumped to conclusion that it's alien spaceship? 😂
Come on bro
As long as it's not proven, it can be anything. Yeah it's advanced af but still can be anything.
This man is full of himself, I can’t watch this for even a second more.
What else is he supposed to be full of if not himself?
He has become a clown show
Ask yourself a question. Why is NGT famous? I think most people know exactly why. Because we all know he isn't famous because he is smart.
let us know, if u caught big foot.
It's like in almost every religion: The religious UFO fundamentalist attack everyone who doubts their religion. Rationality doesn't mean anything to them.
"Who defined us as intelligent?.......we did".
Well than we fucked up if we all decided that
we need not define ourselves intelligent....but intelligence did.?
Pride is the Downfall of every Civilization!
We are the most intelligent form of life in our known solar system, in our known Galaxy, which is a very big deal.. Think of our ancestors and how limited their understanding of the world was, think of how they struggled to survive because they lacked what later Homosapiens have developed all these hundreds of thousands of years later. Big brains got us to where we are today. Its why we have the medicine to extend our own lives well beyond the normal life-expectancy from even a hundred years ago. We've been to our moon, we've launched satellites into space, we've explored a small portion of our deepest Oceans, and we continue to learn, understand and develop new theories about how the Universe works.
I'd say that's pretty intelligent, it may not be what other Civilizations somewhere in the cosmos have achieved in comparison (granted they've had several millions of years to develop compared to us) but I think its a good start.
@@swahiliranger1022 facts!!
"We don't know what that is, and I'm cool with that." - No Scientist Ever.
G MinK LOL SO FUNNY
I think it is a proper scientific response to stay close to the actual evidence, the phenomenon itself, before we claim that we understand it all. It's certainly better than coming off like you know everything and expect people to nod their heads in agreement because you wear a white coat. I think what he is trying to say, however awkwardly, is that he not only doesn't know what UFOs are, he doesn't know how to go about investigating them. He does know how to investigate other phenomena, so he prefers to study those things, not UFOs. He said more than once that he has no problem with other people studying UFOs. It's unfortunate that he clowns it up so much. He sounds like he dismisses the whole phenomenon as a joke. I don't think he is. If he's got a message here it's "Let's not get ahead of ourselves and over-interpret what these observations mean." I have no problem with that.
Exactly can't be a scientist if he doesn't want to know. But when you find out what is really going on you'll kind of wish you hadn't.
Actually every scientist ever. This means that I get to investigate this phenomenon, that none of us can describe. Maybe I have a chance to discover a phenomenon nobody else knows about. I could be the next Einstein, or the next Feynman.
What about the Oregon sighting where five guys ( cops) saw a giant ship moving slow over the town. How much more credible can you get that something strange is happening in our skies.
Came to this after the Pentagon released the UFO videos
hella
Bonjour
Ola
@@someonesomewhere9254 you got a snap???
Yeah - NDT is undoubtably intelligent but also HUGELY arrogant and dismissive. I hope he's as quick to admin he was wrong.
The government shows a moon landing video.
Conspiracy theorists: It's a fake! The government lies!
The government shows an unidentified flying object video.
Conspiracy theorists: Aliens exist! Government confirmed that!
🤯
Both cases are real
Anyone who thinks moon landing is fake should be publicly executed on worldwide television, alongside flat earthers
@demi glas, plus 4 a.lovely lady What word you don't understand in "unidentified flying object"?
demi glas, plus 4 a.lovely lady making fun of conspiracy theorists
He’s definitely covering for his other alien counterparts.
Alien VS human predator
You'd be surprised how many of our smartest people in aeronautics etc. are in with the government selling the theory aliens don't exist.
Lol
@@reyalexandro Neil is probably a disinformation agent. It's obviously working, look how many smartasses think UFO can mean anything if it's not identified, but everyone knows it means alien spacecraft.
@@reyalexandro Agreed. CNN is platform in which the system use to mislead, fake news indoctrination.
He seemed extraordinarily nervous to be talking about something that he totally doesn’t believe in.
@ Jon Fleck-My sentiments exactly...
He’s arguing with two idiots that never took a science class in their lives.
Kaizaro123 Exactly!
He understands that this craft, to him, functions as though it is either a God or under the control of a God. He’s a narcissist but it’s hard to fill that self against such an almighty craft and piece of technology. Okay, so. He elaborated when he suggests “he’s not allowed to go outside the cosmos”.. either this is a subtle Freudian slip suggesting he can’t really dismiss or otherwise criticize something beyond his realm of understanding - or literally, he can’t.
Its literally a "psyop" to prevent the rise of anti-semitism.
Gotta' learn what empathy is, everyone. We could be so far along...
"The UFO phenomena is there to remind us of what we don't know, its there to humble us, to shake our faith about our perception of Science." - Terrence McKenna
And to fart in the faces of atheists and agnostics alike 😂🤣
@@Swarthy144k shut the fuck up
@@Swarthy144k religion is a cancer.
@@Swarthy144k the difference between an atheist and believer is that atheist isn't afraid to admit that they don't know something
Same argument could apply to the Holy Ghost... if you don't know, then that's your truth, but don't go persecuting a witness.
There is no way that he has no interest in those videos. He probably already knows the truth.
The truth? The truth is that no one knows. The truth is that their is no concrete physical evidence of Aliens, we haven't found anything, we haven't dissected any alien corpses (despite what Area 51 conspiracy nutjobs believe) and we haven't recovered any crafts of any kind. The Scientific community remains "skeptical" because its not prudent to believe everything you see, despite what others choose to believe. If someone says "UFO," its just another unfounded, bizarre, often ridiculous story about some sort of "alien visit" that would be the equivalent of telling a spooky story over a campfire. In the end, you need something more interesting then anecdotal evidence to support your theories, you need some actual proof, you need collateral in a way. If I told you that two days ago, an alien appeared at my house, showed me a vision of the future and how we should all stop buying Pepsi or we're all going die, would you believe it? I think its more skeptical to insult the intelligence of rather brilliant people that have designed such advanced technology that we accidentally perceive these contraptions as being "from another world" on occasion.
@@swahiliranger1022 How are you so certain that nobody knows? How do you know an alien corpse has never been dissected? How do you know nothing has been found? There's a lot of credible people who say different. I dont pretend to know either way but it sure seems like something has been going on for a long time.
swahili ranger but you sure sound like you know lol where did you get your PhD?and what are your credentials? Experience? Expertise?...or just a opinion?
No cap
@@swahiliranger1022 I hate to break it to you, but you don't have a clue about this subject matter. The evidence is overwhelming, but I won't get into that. What all I will say is this video alone, when analyzed properly, is enough to formulate a conclusion that this is technology beyond our wildest dreams. I recommend you listen to LT. David Frevor, Luis Elizondo, Bob Lazar and Jeremy Corbell on these objects capabilities.
Few people enjoy the sound of their own voice as much as Neil deGrasse Tyson
I was literally thinking the same thing. 😂
He “joked” a bit too much. Diverting questions.
he's high on energy drinks or something, and himself...hormonal imbalance..
He's trying to not say what he is thinking (most people are idiots).
@@earthcomedy Spot on ! the guy is full of himself and played at being the relaxed knowitall.
that's what i noticed too , he didn't want to engage at all about the object or the tremendous speeds it was doing or the fact the people identifying it are skilled military personnel who kind of know their
shit tbh , he just spent his time joking and coming across as pretty dumb i'm afraid.. :(
He wants to be a fucking celebrity he sucks...He fucking sucks
Why would they interview a scientist that doesn’t care about the topic you want to discuss. Seems like a pointless segment 🤷🏽♀️.
Pushing a narrative.
Neil deGrasse : " it's a flying object and we don't know what it is" 1:42 😂 - Nervous as Hell
Bob Lazar : it's a flying object and i have already told people what it is
Exactly!
Lazar is a fraud
@@Sam-xu3xq I would say that that bumbling idiot Neil De Grasse Tyson is a fraud
@@charlescarabott7692 yet he is way smarter
@@Haveablessedday820 really? Lazar converted his car to run on hydrogen. Also worked at top aero space facilities. So exactly what did DeGrasse do apart from talking a lot?
basicaly, he stated he is not qualified for such interview because he does not care about this subject...
No, he says exactly nobody knows what is and you can speculate but it is worth nothing. Knowledge and speculation are 2 different things. You need data. The data is very poor here
I hope people stop asking him, because I don't want this jackass messing with this subject, anyway
glambor1 just as you are for being so naive
Well, when knowledge fails, the imagination has to take over and theorize. Apparently most of the naysayers here have zero ability to think outside the box.
The investigators at the DOD have the data. And they're virtually concluding that it isn't manmade. If it's not manmade the alien hypothesis makes logical sense. Why resist this with pompous stubbornness? This theory can be rescinded if later shown to be wrong.
Arrogance runs strong in Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Ken Hawk How about misdirection...
Yes , he's full of shit ... He knows....
And he's a bit of a dick...
Beyond shameful. "Top scientist", pffft, more like "Condescending pseudo intellectual prick". Pitiful
where did all you guys get your science degrees?
This guy Neil..he's so smart that he is ignorant. And did I forgot to mention arrogant to say the least.
Bro sees alien come out and abduct him. "Well I dont know. It doesn't mean aliens"
You know he's keeping his mouth 😑🤐🤫 shut so he don't lose his access pass to privy information on UFOs & UAP....👽🤫
What makes him ignorant?
@@shepherdbook8783 Well I lost my part of my family to not visiting me after an demonic attack that the late Lorraine Warren (author of Amityville Horror knew about because I was a walking atheist, I was like a werewolf, face changed too and realized that the Holy Bible is real and not only real it burnt like crazy.
@@shepherdbook8783 God is real and I could tell what was blessed and wasn't. I tell you this..they hate us a million fold. Two the Catholic Church has the realm of the Holy Spirit surrounding each and every one of them.
That laugh..! He doesn't wanna talk about it seriously
Imagine an undiscovered tribe in the Amazon, back in the fifties, watching an airplane fly over for the first time ever, and the tribesmen who saw it, asking the smartest man in the tribe to explain it to them. And, then imagine what he would have probably told them. That's our scientists today trying to explain these UAPs.
@@ralphholiman7401 great way to put it man
@@ralphholiman7401 And that's why he's the smartest man. He admits he doesn't know what it is.
@@ralphholiman7401 the story really happened though..
www.messynessychic.com/2019/02/14/somewhere-on-a-remote-volcanic-island-american-soldiers-are-worshipped-like-gods/
@@unitedetonator Good find!
My respect for DeGrasse just plummeted astronomically. Lamest denial since "swamp gas" Pew Neil
He may be a NASA or Pentagon "puppet" just like Carl Sagan. Governments are well aware that these "UFO's" have been visiting us for decades. But now, with the internet, video recorders on cell phones and people buying high-powered telescopes and software, how much longer can they keep this from the world's populations? If you believe that we are the only intelligent life ANYWHERE, than you needs to go back home to your cave. It's impossible, that we're the only planet that hit the jackpot.
There is no such thing as an expert of interplanetary space travel especially from Earth to Mars - they haven't done it. Who could definitively explain extra terrestrial life or their Earth visiting intentions?
@Yesmer They can totally say they did it for us. The Orson wells radio hoax was a test to gauge peoples reactions to hearing about aliens and the possibility of invasion.
Oh you silly conspiracy theorists, the earth is flat, and "space" isn't what they teach us. There can be no "aliens".
Also, Jesus never mentioned them, and he wrote the Bibble!
Answer THAT and stay fashionable, smarty trousers!
@@Bhatt_Hole Come to threads like this so you can feel superior to people huh? The sad thing is, you are still a loser. Noone said flat earth. We said the government is lying. Grab a twinky, food never makes fun of you.
A good scientist should be skeptical, not overtly dismissive. He says he is "cool with not knowing"- which is fine, as scientists need to feel comfortable with "not knowing" and suspending judgment/conclusions all the time. But why doesn't this make him curious??? We know 22M is nothing considering the DOD budget- it's the fact that the DOD is acknowledging the event.
he's insincere , or he doesn't know shit about warp drive physics.
To me this guy's know what they are up to... How on earth can the most brilliant minds spend much their efforts trying to convince us not not look at the broader picture?
Guys arrogance to dismiss because he can’t explain it. He’s a tool
"It is the circle of knowledge that we have and beyond that circle is the unknown."
Yeah, this guy is just full of bullshit gems like that.
@@Dr.Cosmar Aye....Scientists are the *MOST* uncomfortable not knowing why/how/what something is....thats uh...thats what drives most of scientific study.
@@rpscorp9457 I see your point for sure, that's relatable when I look at the state of oceanic discovery. I feel fear, and I'm not even the one down there. Discomfort is secondary almost lol.
I do have to ask though, isn't the point of being a scientists to attempt an explaination of the unknown with science?
It seems rather silly to choose a proffesion where you would have to face a personal discomfort reluctantly, especially if you are sensitive to that. I wouldn't think just being a scientists somehow aligns you to be uncomfortable approaching the unknown, you ARE given the tools to do so. Unless you staked your life on assuring everyone you know everything (which isn't ok, as a trusted academic professional we rely on them to be prove their assertions, if no one is proving something with pier review they shouldn't be acknowledged).
Of course, if you have no discomfort (of the unknown) or if you are prepared to face it (for one reason or another), Then you wouldn't have a problem rolling up your sleeves and hitting the blackboard.
I would also like to point out how much fear (similar to "discomfort) has pushed back scientific progress before. In my own opinion, if you are scared too unformfortable to attempt an explanation, you should not be an academic voice of reason.
Subject matter at hand, it's unreasonable to accept an extraterrestrial origin of any UFO(unidentified is kinda it's schtick). That's a given, it would be assuming way to much, and scientific discover is not based on assumption ( at least GOOD scientific discovery). To assume it's not ET would be equally falice. Because, in support of that, no nation has stepped forward and claimed it as their own, there is so little we know about our universe, and 65% of the earth remains unexplored.
It is alien (Oxford definition) for sure, top secret maybe, staring at the video is not going to help much though. However, this shouldn't be dismissed. The world wants to know "just what the hell goes on in the vast sky above?". I think the first steps to that; stop being dismissive...figure out where it was going, what might be a destination, where it could have started at, gleam all the information you can, do real science work before we discuss something no one will ever possibly know without the object and potential passenger directly in front of you on a tarmac.
Sorry, I talk a lot buddy, if you read all that, thank you and let me know what you think.
EDITs: Grammar, punctuations, don't know why I kept running with "fear", but it was easily exchangable without compromising the integrity of my comment.
@@Dr.Cosmar Youre in the right direction. Until we have star trek-like scanners though, i dont think we are ever going to learn anything. Plus, who knows what the pentagon has in its investigations. What they release is only the bare minimum. If an independent science organization makes a groundbreaking discovery in any number of fields, its usually immediately classified by the parent government anyway.
Hi Where could I buy the tie as the same as Neil’s ? I really need it.
This guy is soooo full of hot air....
@Trevor Honer exactly education just takes a level of passion and memory to "be smart" in most peoples eyes. and being able to research into things.
This guy has become a caricature of himself, hard to take him seriously. He is just out to sell books.
This guy is a paid disinformation specialist.......wake the “F” up...people
FACTS........!!
Wake up people it's us human's where in that craft no bull remember solar warden
JIMBOB JONEZ what exactly has he lied about? Please provide proof or examples, just one.
Brennan Kline
And, no answers.
it was surely flying at 10times faster than the hornet jets ..
How do you figure?
@Jon Doe if it's emitting no heat signature how is it showing on FLIR? Also, FLIR doesn't measure velocity. All its telling you is its _angular_ velocity, which could be a fast object far away, or a slow object close by.
@Jon Doe You obviously have no idea how an ATFLIR targeting pod tracks contacts. You've made up your mind that this is Xenu from Blargglar and are building everything from that presumption.
@Jon DoeThere's nothing suggesting that this has to be anything extraterrestrial, but you want to believe so bad that you're willing to fool yourself by presuming that it is
@Jon Doe You're arguing from ignorance: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
Neil deGrasse: "We don't know what UFOs are.....so we just dismiss them altogether and look into deep space to try and find microbial life instead.
Yep, the guy is an arrogant tool
He's not authorized. That was the only straight forward thing he said.
And that bitch he was talking to acted like she is authorized...
Agreed
Correct. he is not authorized, because he is federal government scientist... & NASA has been lying, hiding, & discreetly avoiding UFOLOGY from public consumption......mortally afraid of possible consequences, if US DEFENCE forces take on UFO'S who seem to have technology way ahead of our own.
True
Exactly
Why is Neil so evasive about this? The implications of this are tremendous in the science community. If there is no apparent thrust from these vehicles then how are they propelling themselves? What physics describes how the vehicle is being propelled? Surely these vehicles are not using Tesla batteries. Therefore, what energy source are they using? The answers to these questions could change the course of humankind and Neil seems disinterested and wants to leave those kinds of questions to the military to research? Neils response was about as alien as what he was talking about. Sure hope others pressure him and other scientists to give more scientific responses to what is being seen in the video and explain how much money and effort the scientific community are spending on acquiring this technology? Fossil fuels could be a thing of the past as well as man-made climate change.
@joseph orste, the fact that the pentagon spent $22 mils over 7 years to do research on this, it means they taking this very seriously!! and so should the scientific community.
Joseph Oreste I agree. Here is a short excerpt of an interview with Luis Elizondo, a former CIA officer who headed The Advanced Aerospace Identification Program at the Pentagon.
"In my opinion, if this was a court of law, we have reached the point of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. I hate to use the term UFO, but that’s what we’re looking at,” Mr Elizondo told The Telegraph.
“I think it’s pretty clear this is not us, and it’s not anyone else, so one has to ask the question where they’re from.”
Mr Elizondo told the newspaper there were geographical “hot spots” - sometimes around nuclear facilities and power plants - which emerged during AATIP’s investigations, as well as common factors between UFO sightings.
He said: “It was enough where we began to see trends and similarities in incidents. There were very distinct observables. Extreme manoeuvrability, hypersonic velocity without a sonic boom, speeds of 7,000mph to 8,000mph, no flight surfaces on the objects. A lot of this is backed with radar signal data, gun camera footage from aircraft, multiple witnesses.
People are making an assumption that the object is actually moving.
bighands69 i guess you’ve figured it out partially as well, that its actually not them moving, which does explain their energy source, why they have little to no friction, and how they can pass speed of light easily. Even with a gravity engine tho, they can still hit stuff so that can cause accidents. Or the engine can overload and destroy itself.
@@masterpepe3641
That is a lot of assumptions on your behalf.
Neil is just being cautious, but you have to ask, "what flies 15,000 mph?" it buzzed away, it jammed the F18's radar, it was 40+ feet long, Oh and did I mention it flew away at 15,000 mph without burning up in earth's atmosphere. I'd like to sit down with Neil and SHOW him the evidence, Neil would change his mind.
the Navy and other countries' Navies have tracked with cutting edge solid state radar and other satellites and sensor data these nonhuman in origin craft going over 280,000 MPH, and doing perfet 90 degree turns & instant stop/starts at over 46,000MPH or way more, and with no noise, no heat signatures, & can go from orbital space to 0 ft above the ocean in less than 0.78 of a second, and can go deep underwater at faster than the speed of sound. Even the former head of the French spy agency said they're being recorded going the speed of sound or faster underwater, and that's just the tip of the tip of the iceberg for the latest high level admissions from all over...the Navy is tracking 10,000 or more of them per day just around US waters alone...absolutely 1 trillion % fucking nonhuman in origin..and that doesn't even include the millions per yr of civilians and govt/military personel saying they've definitely been abducted or manipulated/contacted/had contact experiences with nonhuman entities...just barely scratching the surface of what's going on here..and don't forget about the millions per year globally who go missing without any trace and a big % of those have absolutely no scientifically plausible explanation at all for their disappearances...
@@johnmuzic3475 Yep, something is happening, it's all over the news AND the internet. Phew John, just hope they are friendly! Stay safe.
When I encounter with an alien I'm going to take a selfie with it.
Isn’t this the same guy who claims curiosity to be one of the main driving forces of the scientific process? And yet he doesn’t seem too interested in confirmed objects that defy our common understanding of physics.
Did you notice this clown never debates anybody
He said he was happy the Pentagon is investigating it. That shows curiosity right there. That he doesn't want to investigate it personally doesn't mean he lacks curiosity. One can only take on so many projects in a lifetime. You have to choose the ones that interest you most. He's likely not trying to learn bassoon or find the city of Atlantis either.
According to 2 long time government theoretical physicists who worked on directed energy weapons and advanced propulsion for decades, the physics are understood now, and no new physics are required to understand it. It's permissible under general relativity, and they are trying to get their theory good enough to build one. They're Eric Davis and Hal Puthoff. They currently work with Elizondo and To the Stars Academy and worked with NIDS and government agencies. Why the networks keep calling in idiots to act as experts on this, , well it's beyond stupid. Tyson's performance showed he didn't do any homework.
Bill Katakis Eric Davis and Hal Puthoff should have been the ones interviewed for this. But the press only goes to the celebrity mouthpieces in science. I know all about these guys and their study on this subject. Your comment should draw a hundred thumbs ups. This is baffling that the serious comments aren’t acknowledged here.
Neal ""refuse"" to lose his privy privilege card to the shadow government by any means necessary 👽🤫🤐🤔👀
So basically he proved he does not care about having evidence or not. Great! What a scientist!
He was saying the evidence wasn't indicative of the fact that aliens have visited Earth. He addresses the evidence directly
Benji exactly, imagine seeing a flying saucer right in front of your face and you're convinced it's an alien. In reality there are many possibilities as to what it can be and an alien is the least likely. The only reason you think that the ufo has aliens inside is because of Hollywood and such.
@@realkushman That's not the point, he does not say we need to invesigate what they are, alien or not! In fact he says he's alright withouth knowing nothing about it, wich it's ridiculous...
Fabricio Pereira leave the astrophysics to the astrophysicists. If you think you could do a better job as a scientist then do it
@@realkushman Tell that to the program that invited an astrophysicist to talk about it in first place...
I love how a flying ship breaking all our laws of physics isn’t alien. Then what will it be? We none of us no country knows how to make something to break the sound barrier without a sonic bomb
so many things they do, that our aircraft can't. Silly to just dismiss the alien possibility.
@@AnunnakiAaron michio kaku said it's very reasonable to believe it's ETs.
I feel like Niel got paid to be a ufo skeptic
How does he not even talk AT ALL about the video? All he does is say oh I don't know, that's not my business, let someone else look into it. Does this guy not know about physics to talk about how the object is rotating and flying?
well yeah except he does not have anything to say about it other then its clearly a ufo.
He and Michio Kaku are scared to admit anything in the realm of ETs because they are already fighting for credibility from the religious folk.
MegaMattjb I know right he totally proves that he is not that person who wants to be in the forefront of science. - He’s like you go research that shit and then when it’s all facts i’ll make a TV-show about it. He’s def not up there with Einstein or Tesla. He knows it so he’s a entertainer.
MegaMattjb
Fake news, fake video, fake reality
WhirlOmar
Hmmmm but are you a fan of CNN tho?
Now that they showed a ship across mainstream media and played dumb about it, Tyson is nowhere to be found to comment on the subject.
Best part is "they don't come for fuzzy videos, they'll do something that everyone will notice"
As camera quality improves, those videos become less and less and the remaining are still blurry.
I love how she threw in the "God Bless You" in the beginning.
goddess by the fake as aliens and shut
1:15 he says he's not authorized. I'm sure he wasn't kidding. As an astrophysicist how can you not be interested in what it is?
I'll tell you why. It's taboo in his social/academic circles and if he were to take this seriously, there goes his grants for research or another invitation to host a television series like Cosmos. That's why.
@@silversurfer4441 You're probably more right than you know about that.
I mean, look what happened to Bob Lazar when he spoke out. His Academic record is all but erased and they threatened to murder him.
Sniff Heinkel that poor man I love bob for what he did, I consider him a hero
@@SniffHeinkel, ETV illustrator, Mark McCandlish, also told of someone who'd successfully made an Anti - gravity device and he and his audience were severely told by the military and/or a govt. agency rep. to destroy all evidence of it, not to speak of it and forget about the whole thing!!!
I once respected you.
now you don't because he doesn't go along with your beliefs? grow up
science is based on proof, not speculations
@Multorum Unum lol you just got pwned breh.. Set your self up for that though, was a pretty stupid comment.
You don't respect him, not because he doesn't immediately validate the existence of aliens, but because similar to Bill Nye, Tyson's political opinions contradict yours. Don't worry, thankfully he doesn't need your approval to continue his work.
@@AmieB2005 exactly!
Getting a Neil deGrasse Tyson ad after this video is marketing at its finest
The whole question of alien existence feels like an episode of The Twilight Zone.
While I respect Mr. Tyson's viewpoint & skepticism, I don't like the way he conveniently dismisses the phenomenon. To hear him say he's not interested, that's a bit disappointing. Not sure if he's just caught up in the moment or not but it's not something I can cosign.
No that's Neil! I've been viewing this attitude on this subject for years.
He knows he can't know the answer, and he knows that there's a really high chance that we'll never know the answer. To give it an answer for conveniences sake is no better than accepting your own ignorance. Sometimes, the answer that we don't know is far better than substituting something we think we know in there.
Also, honestly, the phenomenon might just be that humans like to blame the unexplained on...something that we can't prove exists one way or the other. I mean, isn't that weird, that so many people can just accept that this is aliens, something we don't conclusively know exists at all? I say that's weird, when I think about it, it's the exact same thing Religious people have done for millennia, blame something that we can't explain on God, something we can't conclusively know exists at all as well...maybe it's not even a phenomena, just something we humans have done and always will do. Just need a different name for the blank to blame it on.
Edit: I should make clear, we might one day know conclusively that aliens exist. We won't know that aliens were the cause of the UFO in this video. That's what we don't understand.
Teh Architek Unfortunately he's not just caught up in the moment. He gives this answer all the time on this subject.The guy from the DOD program said this is not technology of this world so whose is it? It deserves more than a casual dismissal. You would think he would be a more reasonable guy but it's like he doesn't want to hear about it at all.
The lack of interest is the nail on the head. Sure we don't know what it is, but arent scientists supposed to be interested? Take dark matter, very very interesting for many scientists although it has never been seen and possibly doesn't even exist. UFOs on the other hand have been spotted and do exist obviously (whatever they are) yet most scientists just ignore them.
Perhaps he needs his own experience to convince him.
Sheesh... talk about protecting your credibility.
You are completely missing his point. Its called the argument from ignorance. He's not saying it is or isnt, hes stating that we dont know, therefore we can speculate, and to do so is an argument from ignorance. Another form of this is "the god of the gaps" which states that when we dont know something, people insert god as the answer; its the same thing with UFO's, we dont know, therefore it must be aliens. Thats not how it works. It works as the following: You see an object and you dont know what it is, so you hypothesize that it could be aliens. That is where most people stop, but dont realize that "its aliens" is a hypothesis, and now you must collect evidence to prove its an alien. That is what Neil is talking about, you cant just say "I dont know what that is, it must be aliens", it doesnt work that way.
Exactly. He's clearly hiding information. I contacted UFOS a few times already. Everyone knows that they are here.
@@MrTonyMeadows where's your high definition videos of aliens?))))
@@smashexentertainment676 I only have my cell phone. Im just a regular person. However I am a Christian with A few spiritual gifts but I recently discovered I can contact UFOS. Or When I pray to God he allows me to see them.
@@MrTonyMeadows ahahaha, nice) Btw, UFO stands for Unidentified Flying Object. That could be a bird, a frisbee, a missile, a drone, a spacecraft, pterodactyl etc.
Y’all trippin. He is literally saying we don’t know what it is.
Pentagon confirmed the object was "made not on earth"
@@kentolope1252 Could you provide a link to the statement by the Pentagon? I'm curious how they came to the conclusion that it's not made on earth.
@Wayne Gale Where did you get those numbers from? From the videos, it doesn't seem like they were hovering in mid-air and then speeding up to those speeds.
If we're using logic and reason, I believe that broken equipment or a more common phenomenon to be more likely than a highly advanced alien civilization that we haven't heard from. I believe that it would still more likely to be a natural phenomenon that's not identified, rather than aliens, even if the natural phenomenon was unheard of. The premises for the unheard natural phenomenon would just be that the phenomenon appears under conditions that are rare and that those conditions are met. For aliens, you would need an exoplanet that supports life, life to thrive on said planet, life to develop intelligence on said planet, and life to develop space travel, that life not sending us any signals of their existence, civilization not dying out, all while flying in the airspace of our planet for unknown reasons. Occam's Razor would suggest that the natural phenomenon would be more likely to be true, than the assumption that aliens exist. Because it's an unidentified object, we cannot even say if it has mass or not. For all we know, it might just be a reflection of light. Because we can't tell what it is, we would need irrefutable evidence of aliens existing in order to assume that it could be of alien origin. Because we can come up with other explanations for the UFO, we can't just assume it's aliens. Even once we have proven that aliens do exist, we cannot simply state that the UFO is of alien origin. However, now we can consider it as a viable option among the others.
@Build a Reef Aquatics TLDR: The information in the video is not from a reliable source.
I do not believe that the video you linked is from a reliable source. Looking at what the channel has posted in the past, they seem to rely on clickbait a lot, with the common theme being the idea that a single video could change your life into a successful one. Recently, they seem to have focused more on conspiracy theories. While clickbait may not necessarily be an indication of lying, it is still a scummy practice. Using clickbait on a video that is trying to talk about real information is not the best idea, as it gives off the impression that without the clickbait they wouldn't get as many views. If the message in the video was truly as important as they claim, you wouldn't need to have to promote it that way.
Dr. Steven Greer appears to have been a real physicist, though he is currently retired. In that sense, his views could be considered to have some credibility as he has worked in the field. However, we can't say that they are superior to the scientific consensus as a whole. On his website, he lists a few of the experiments on new energy. I will only be taking into account the "Kowsky-Frost Experiment" as that seems to have demonstrated the nullified mass property.
The PDF file which discusses the K-F Experiment mentions that it was from keelynet.com with the site owner's permission. However, based on a WhoIs lookup, we cannot check what kind of site keelynet.com was, as the site is set to reject any requests to access it. The University of Pennsylvania has archived multiple years of the Science and Innovation magazine, which allows us to conclude that the experiment shown is the same as the one in the archived versions of the article. However, now we face a problem. Dr. Greer stated that the PDF file was the scientific paper for the K-F experiment, but it was just an article discussing the experiment. It was not written by the original authors of the experiment, but it's a paraphrased version of the text. For the sake of the argument, let's give it more credibility by assuming that it is a perfectly translated version of the one released by Radio Umschau, rather than a translated paraphrased version of a paraphrased version. This still doesn't help Dr. Greer's case, as we've proven that he has misinformed us, but we could still continue and doubt the credibility of the article further. As a source, the article mentions Radio Umschau as a reliable source. However, they are referring to an article released on the first of April. The implication of the date should make you doubt anything you read or hear from that date, as jokes and hoaxes are often put among the reliable information. Comparing it to the rest of the articles in the "Science and Innovation" -magazine, the K-F experiment doesn't mention any names. While the magazine does have articles that don't mention who wrote the article, all of the articles related to discovery or invention made by someone mention the full names of the people involved. For the K-F experiment, the discoverers of the phenomenon are just referred to as "Dr. Kowsky and Engineer Frost". From the lack of information, we can't really figure out who these people were or if their results are true. The only way for us to confirm the experiment would be to perform it ourselves. However, we do not have access to the paper. Merely a paraphrased version of it.
The results of that are mentioned do not state that the quartz block became massless. They only refer to the block having negative weight and that the current made it counteract the force of gravity. When you measure the weight of an object, you're actually measuring the force of gravity that acts on the object. The force of gravity acting on it is the standard gravity times the mass of the object when on earth as according to Newton's second law. The scale measures the strength of that force and tells you the weight of the object. The scale will give you a completely different answer if you went on a different planet. Your weight might decrease or increase depending on the force of gravity, but your mass would remain constant. Even if you were to experience no gravitational force, you would still have mass. Using Newton's second law, we can say that in order for the Quartz block to float, the total amount of force acting upon the block has to be zero vertically. That can be achieved by applying a force that is equal to the gravitational force, but in the opposite direction to it. Increase that force, and the object goes up. Decrease it and it goes down. The article doesn't mention if it is indeed the mass that's being decreased, or if the force of gravity is simply nullified by another force.
What Dr. Greer has given us on the topic is information that is dubious at best. Not only that, but the channel that the video was uploaded on seems to use clickbait a lot and make videos disclosing the secrets behind success and how anyone can gain wealth easily, or how certain frequencies have peculiar properties.
what are the names of those anchors?
This scientist is talking in riddles and when the interviewer tried to ask him direct questions about aliens, he tried every way to avoid answering by using humour to make light of it or directing the conversation onto a different question.
Because he doesn’t know what it is. Will you be happy for him to lie, just so
The lie is in line with your personal preference?
He's really not that smart for an astrophysicist.
He said he doesn't care even about the possibility of aliens visiting Earth...doesn't sound like any human I know, or would even want to know.
science explainer and fool, we are far ahead of his crap. theres more then enough evidence..he is too far behind if this is how he thinks what a fool lost a fan ..sad day.he doesn't even care about objects speed or characteristics
some kind of scientist...... WTF.
Evasius are you suggesting Neil Degrasse Tyson may... in fact be an extraterrestrial?
He’s bullshitting
He’s only saying what they allow him to say in front of the public. He’s a scientist.. you damn well he’s been believing since he was a child.
ROBO 24 are you hurt?
Evasius he didn't say that, I watched the video.
It’s like a professor teaching elementary school students.
lmfao the same person who belive in evolution and that humans came from f is and everything came from nothing 14 billion years ok lmfao dosent belive in aliens oh there's no proof for aliens exsists such i don't think there is but says there's proof for something that happend 14 billion years ago lmfao no there's not proof for that neil
@@rejected4760 lmfao what that dosent make any lodgicoly since
I mean UFO doesn't instantly mean alien spacecraft but in the footage presented I don't think there are many things of this earth that can be compared to it. All we can do is theorise and for now "Aliens" might be the most relevant explanation.
Plus it matches up with earlier accounts that have been witnessed and recorded countless times before (these accounts go as far back as the earliest recorded history by the way). I don't think we have had anything close to that capability except for maybe the last 50 years or so. In retrospect it becomes the most plausible answer because the alternatives become ever increasingly stranger. Personally once you accept it it's not really that big of a deal anymore and I don't get why skeptics would rather believe anything but alien spacecraft. It's like as long as it's a naturalistic explanation (whether it makes sense or not) they automatically just accept that as the default. I've literally seen them take the explanation of these being just birds as a rational option, as if an experienced Navy pilot would ever make that mistake. As if a veteran Navy pilot has never seen such a thing while flying before. Bring this up and they shut you out like any other person they actually know how to debunk properly. Most of the time they are right, but confront them with something they cannot explain and they become exactly like the true believers they argue with. The modern skeptical method is sound for the most part, but it also has its own flawed and biased reasoning in some circumstances. They all know our knowledge is far from complete, yet still take everything modern physics says as holy writ. It's incredibly close minded and hypocritical in my opinion.
Exactly! And it’s totally normal to speculate “alien” for now; it’s totally human. But this seems to offend scientists even if we admit that we’re postulating and aren’t concluding that what’s observed “must be” alien.
@@DeathBYDesign666 You really trust the accounts of desert dwelling goat herders and literal primordial colonies of ancient civilizations? Why? What do you think they knew back then that we don't know now? Their are people who actually believe ALIENS built the pyramids of Giza, but that's not true (turns out it was the Egyptians the whole time). You think the ancient Mayans ACTUALLY saw UFO's? How about comets, eclipses, strange phenomena in the sky that they couldn't explain. They didn't understand what they were looking at, and even more to point every Civilization made mock-ups or caricatures whenever they met other races, so who knows? Maybe those who journeyed across the ocean looking all crazy weird and different from the Mayans themselves were the ones they were referencing.
@@swahiliranger1022 No I don't necessarily trust their accounts at face value actually, but I think there's more than enough evidence to know that they could tell the difference between stellar phenomenon and flying craft. Columbus also allegedly saw these things in the middle of the ocean and he navigated by the stars. I myself have also seen objects that defy all known laws of aerodynamics and modern technological capabilities. On their own they don't add up to much, but when you put them all together a pattern starts to emerge. I'm not a huge advocate of the subject either, but I do believe there is a bit more there than most skeptics will acknowledge. I think it's a bit more foolish to just dismiss it out of hand, it's not like we know all there is to know enough to do so.
How about "angels" or some other form of "spiritual" entity? 🤔
I really liked Neil but this is face palm worthy. The news anchors are trying to have a serious discussion about whats going on and the science guy they bring on just clowns around every step of the way. I m sorry but he needs to get a clue.
David Whitenack What he’s saying is we can’t jump to a conclusion, we have to use the scientific method before proving it a fact. And we can’t do with minutes of footage
Jesse Music Here is a short excerpt of an interview with Luis Elizondo, a former CIA officer who headed The Advanced Aerospace Identification Program at the Pentagon.
"In my opinion, if this was a court of law, we have reached the point of ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. I hate to use the term UFO, but that’s what we’re looking at,” Mr Elizondo told The Telegraph.
“I think it’s pretty clear this is not us, and it’s not anyone else, so one has to ask the question where they’re from.”
Mr Elizondo told the newspaper there were geographical “hot spots” - sometimes around nuclear facilities and power plants - which emerged during AATIP’s investigations, as well as common factors between UFO sightings.
He said: “It was enough where we began to see trends and similarities in incidents. There were very distinct observables. Extreme manoeuvrability, hypersonic velocity without a sonic boom, speeds of 7,000mph to 8,000mph, no flight surfaces on the objects. A lot of this is backed with radar signal data, gun camera footage from aircraft, multiple witnesses.
David Whitenack Dumb questions, dumb answers even from an esteemed scientist.
David Whitenack exactly... he's just another Bill Nye.. making jokes n being a dick when people are asking serious questions.. disinformation pawn. I used ta like him too and any type of phenomenon shit he's gotta clown around.
But that's the thing. This isn't a serious discussion. The whole idea is just drowned with pseudosciences, narcissistic bullshit, hysteria, and conspiracy that any seriousness that it may of had left ages ago. So I wouldn't blame poor Tyson for laughing so much, because the idea itself is riddle with unscientific bullshit and hysteria.
Neil deGrasse Tyson is completely out of his league
I don't think he knows what league he's in but based on the comments section I think he's getting a pretty good idea.
like you are any good you did you eveng et wha the said stupid
@@Mark-Wilson if you can't structure a sentence together, then you should refrain from calling anyone stupid.
@@jeremyvoel-pel357 hahahaha, exactly.. "burb durp, eh uhhhh, beep boop, poopoo" That's how my brain processed that sentence.
He is out of his league with everything. He is just a token intellectual. The media wanted a minority scientist and he just got lucky to be there when they needed one. I guarantee you that he ranks among the bottom as far as intelligent physicists.
Neil: I know it looks like a cat and moves like a cat but it’s actually a tree.
hey this is all the footage that was just released how did you get this in 2017?
Anthony Monforte the footage was just *officially* released and confirmed, but is been out there since 2017.
The most important part of this segment, "Everyone has cameras on them now, but there are no more videos than there were before the cellphone"... paraphrasing from another interview he gave.
He said it, he has the right. My god
It could mean that the hypothetical aliens are being more cautious now and that somehow, they are able to see uploads to the internet to measure their...publicity.
Correlation does not mean causation. However, he's made a salient point.
@@ex0stasis72 if they were that smart then why haven’t they done anything considering the giant blow up of “publicity” recently. You’d think they’d be concerned if they can see what we’re saying.
@@Natureguy-le8pl Not to take this too seriously, but to further the thought experiment, I was referring to the “close encounter” reports from random people from decades ago. The hypothetical aliens may have stopped with the close encounters or have been doing a better job at covering up than before. This recent “publicity” is hypothetically of their air/space craft from far away and reportedly sighted everyday for years by the military. But they go ignored, so they continue doing what they’ve been doing.
Strange how Neil deGrasse Tyson seems to have so little interest in these unidentified aerial phenomena. You’d think as a professional he’d be fascinated and trying to figure out what these things are. But he says he is not interested.
Why can't he at least look into the 1000's of reports from
people who have had experiences with intelligent. He won't
it's his job to spread disinformation..that's his role.
@@JamesTKirk-vs4bb he mentioned in other talks that human testimony is an unreliable source of evidence in science, so your argument fails.
@@adithyay328 That's the problem with society.. We are so quick to adhere to anything people throw in our faces. You are a puppet being led on a string. "Human testimony is an unreliable source of evidence in science". What phrase can be so conveniently worded to discredit anything anyone has to say about Alien life. You are quoting a man that does not have the authority (as he stated in an interview on a news show) to reveal anything about intelligent life. Your argument is baseless.
@@tyroneadams8706 I mean, it seems pretty simple to prove to me.
An example: You ever watch a horror movie, then over-react and think that every small sound, every dark hallway is an indication of the thing you are afraid of being there? I know I have. It's your brain preemptively increasing the level of anxiety to protect you from threats in the near future.
What I'm getting at is that the human brain is perfectly capable of, and does, modify what it perceives based on what it deems is important information. When a human reports ANY incident, what they saw or experienced is influenced both by what they actually perceived, AND their mental state, and other factors affecting their perception; how tired they were, etc.
As well, humans skew what they perceived based on what they WANT to perceive. This is backed by a well known and proven psychological occurrence called "confirmation bias": humans tend to recall, interpret, or favor information that conforms with what they want to see and what their word view is. Of the people out there LOOKING FOR UFOs and aliens, the majority WANT to see a UFO. So when they see something that could, BUT MAY NOT BE A UFO, their brain will subconsciously skew what they saw to support their assertion. Then, later, when they recall the information, they subconsciously SKEW what they saw to support their claim, which makes their evidence useless to anyone.
This is why I agree with his statement regarding the irrelevance of human testimony.
Citations for the theories invoked:
Anxiety as a response to perceived stressors: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3181681/
Confirmation bias:
psy2.ucsd.edu/~mckenzie/nickersonConfirmationBias.pdf
@@adithyay328 Well written, and I understand your argument, however, I cannot
undertake dialogue with someone who believes we are alone in the universe.
As Neil Degrasse stated, it would be unbelievably egotistical to think we are
alone in the universe.
These sightings have been reported since cavemen times and are featured in cave art, legend and lore.. The cases most fascinating/believable are those which took place prior to mankind taking flight, before we had anything in the sky that we could confuse with something extraterrestrial!.
I myself have done extensive research including the baffling nuclear weapons connection with Robert Hastings, would you mind providing me some links on this cave art?
He asks why aren’t there videos. He just watched a video.
The universe is infinite therefore “aliens” must exist. It makes no sense that we are alone. Also most scientists base the universe off of our own knowledge. We literally know nothing about this universe.
He says this all the time. He believes aliens exist. The probability is pretty good. The problem is that we have NO EVIDENCE that they are close enough or intelligent enough to enter our atmosphere.
Alyssa I believe we get evidence all the time. I think a lot of what’s known about other life forms isn’t projected to the public. Maybe people wouldn’t know how to handle it. Or maybe they don’t want to be seen but rather observe us as we observe ants.
First of all. There are alot of fake videos on the Internet. Some of them look really real to make us believe. But you are kinda right. Every thing that is on this earth. Came from space.
But there is no such a thing us aliens coming to us. Like comon ALL of the vidoes on the internet were filmed by one person. Not from other users that had to encounter them.
I dont think aliens came to earth
But aliens or other life does exist in any shape or form.
Exactly
Time and space is eternal
That means....................
None is saying aliens don't exist, but you have to be realistic when thinking about aliens. 1. It's probable that if aliens do exist , that they are so far away from us that we would never detect them. 2. Humans have lived a blink of an eye in comparison to the universe, so in order for us to discover aliens , they must also live within that blink of eye (which would be highly unlikely)
NDT talks so much but says so little. He didn’t even give an explanation of the video/pentagon budget if its not “aliens”...
He's a scientist, just trying to find the most reasonable explainable reason behind it and I get that. But to me, this at least points to technology that might be well beyond his or the rest of the scientific community's knowledge. To just laugh it off is kind of strange to me. I get not putting all your eggs in the aliens basket but geez Neil
Comiccon joke was amazing lmao
not really
I don't need NDT to explain what "unknown" means. She's literally just asking what you think it is.
If it's "unknown" there are endless possibilities for what it could be. That's what he's trying to explain here.
@@aeropostale101nw That's not good enough based on what's been confirmed that these crafts are not … if they're not our earthly technology, as the AATIP investigators virtually concluded, then what many other explanations can they speculate about?
Yes guitar junkie, the guy is so arrogant he just baby talks to everyone else because he has such a superiority complex. Like the rest of us don’t know what the plain English words, “unidentified flying object” means
xAlerick: you must be the only one that understood him this way, it sounds like to everyone else that he is being completely dismissive and that he is implying that people are being deluded By ordinary phenomenon.
@@aeropostale101nw That's poor explanation for someone who should know something about theory of probability in context of cognitive issues. There is WAAAY bigger probability for someone want to hold that hoax (UFO) for money $$$, because majority od people live in fear of the unknown mixed with incompettence, and this topic making them super-duper noisy online/tv/radio/media. USA is a mother of marketing. They even changing definitions of concepts just for beeing spotted as "not-so-bad" so yeah. Congrats. Love when someone explaining me that #sunisshining, that #seasarewaving and have that excited face with huge eyeballs.
In the first 5 sec you can figure out that this is another attempt to ridicule the whole matter. I am not a fan of smartass Tyson anyway.
Would love to see Neil talking with Bob Lazar
4:21 u saw that particular gesture?...😯The second one was the cover up
????
As a scientist, I wonder why he wouldn't be interested in a vehicle that can maneuver faster than any known man made vehicle at right angles with this being confirmed by government pilots? Unless... he is privy to some knowledge that we aren't. Maybe I should change the "known" to "publicly known".
Ikr? what scientist would not be interested? it's kind of sad seeing him saying that considering how respectable he is
There is an assumption that the object is actually moving and that it is not a incident of view perspective.
@@bighands69 it was witnessed and followed by the gunship pilot who's observations were backed up by radar evidence from the ground.
Tyson, is obviously, trying to debunk the UFO phenomenon and doing a bad job of it.
What's to debunk here? Lol! All the trained observers, all the Detailed Sensor Data. This is no fluke. No hoax. No misunderstanding.
You are completely missing his point. Its called the argument from ignorance. He's not saying it is or isnt, hes stating that we dont know, therefore we can speculate, and to do so is an argument from ignorance. Another form of this is "the god of the gaps" which states that when we dont know something, people insert god as the answer; its the same thing with UFO's, we dont know, therefore it must be aliens. Thats not how it works. It works as the following: You see an object and you dont know what it is, so you hypothesize that it could be aliens. That is where most people stop, but dont realize that "its aliens" is a hypothesis, and now you must collect evidence to prove its an alien. That is what Neil is talking about, you cant just say "I dont know what that is, it must be aliens", it doesnt work that way.
@@Mercplx Right!!
The level of density I see in the comment section takes the crown from Osmium.
Because someone says it's not Aliens he is a shill... even though he never denied it's Aliens he is just saying wtf is the likelihood of you seeing something you don't understand and it actually being an alien is ridiculously low.
If you take a flashlight back a few hundred years they would think you are a wizard..
He is not a shill.. simply a scientist who will not accept anything without evidence that has been tested and proven through the scientific method.
@Mitch Swanson So a scientist.. is not jumping to conclusions about something he doesn't have enough information on.. So he is a shill right?
Or he is simply using the scientific method to verify what he believes to be factual.
Something he has been doing his whole life.
He didn't deny aliens. He is quoted saying "It would be extremely arrogant to assume we are the only ones out there" Not verbatim but you get the idea.
He is not a denier. Simply someone who needs evidence that's tested and proven before he makes a claim like "thats an alien craft"
How does this not compute?
I would love for it to be Aliens.
How amazing would that be. We just can't claim that because we don't understand something therefore aliens.
Its a flaw in human thinking going back to our origins.
I can easily debunk it since I have 5 reasons that are actually logical
He believes in aliens but doesn’t wanna talk about it publicly cause people will come after him. He doesn’t want the drama
Maybr
Yes i think so
No, no, no, you fucking idiots!
_Unidentified_ means *_UN-FUCKING-IDENTIFIED!!!_*
I'm curious what the next segment was that they decided Niels time was up.
neil degrasse tyson why son? A part of my inner scientist died today. As a astrophysicist you just played yourself. You chose laughs and giggles over a chance to introduce science and mathematics into a subject that rarely gets it in the public eye. Not cool
AMEN to that, , he shit on science with this interview.
How did he played himself? Because he didn't say what you wanted to hear?
Before you read on, everyone in this comment section is or has gone to Harvard, Yale, Columbia and Ivy league schools. Everyone has a phd in theoretical physics and knows everything about aliens. You can carry on now.
Absolutely
Highly educated people don't watch CNN, lul.
Steeb You don't have to go to Harvard to know this guy is full of shit . All he's doing is trying to down play the UFO enigma just like the government has been doing for the past 60 something years..Who are you , are you a UFO expert ?
SummerNights & Neon lights
You seem to be
+Noud Janssen I know more then the average person.
0:56 yeah... That makes sense
I have an alien story when I was 12 my brother was at his friend house on Easter during eggs that same night I went to sleep at my house and had a dream about seeing flashing lights in the sky that could move really fast when my brother got home he told me that he saw what he and his friend thought was a ufo and explain what it was like the weird part was that it was exactly the same as the dream I had the same night.
All Neil does is regurgitate information he read and then acts like he found it. Also why couldnt this interview be informative? I thought he was a scientist not a comedian...
They pay him to say bullshit why do you think he’s on all these fucking game shows he can’t stay off of TV with his dumb ass he’s a dumb scientist
@@bigdaddyromeo9631 FACTS !! THAT'S SO TRUE
How exactly do you expect him to be informative about something nobody knows anything about?
Jesus christ how tight is your tin foil hat buddy? 🙄🙄🙄🙄
It’s amazing how someone that’s so intelligent would make such silly comments. Maybe he knows aliens are real but is being paid to down play it.
@Kaizaro123 you need to thoroughly investigate this topic then you wouldn't be asking these questions
Kaizaro123 - just watch Tyler’s CZcams channel called “Secure team”
The information he’s putting out will be all the proof you need.
PickleNick - of course genders exist one produces babies and the other doesn’t right?
Aliens and UFO’s are completely different. If there able to travel all the way to our galaxy and visit our planet don’t you think that they would be much more technologically advanced than us?
Wouldn’t they cloak themselves to be invisible, only be seen as inferred objects or make themselves look like clouds or something completely unrecognizable to us so not to get our attention?
How many people actually look to the sky for anything
at all? They can be right above us at anytime and we would be oblivious to them.
All of the skeptics are doing exactly what they want us to do - staying ignorant to there existence.
Kaizaro123 - just be observant to the facts that are out there Kaizaro 123.
Over the years I have seen plenty of shows that state undisputed facts on this. I’ll list a few.
1) the structures on the moon and Mars alone.
2) The surveillance from the ISS and space shuttles showing Disc shaped craft leaving entering and orbiting earth.
3) Military surveillance of flying crafts entering and exiting the oceans at a tremendous speed.
4) Plus the mere fact that science has proved that there are trillions upon trillions of galaxies out there each galaxy containing billions of stars.
5) How can earth be the only ONE planet with intelligent life? 🤷♂️. That would make no sense right? Wouldn’t that be a huge waste of space for all of it to stay empty and void of life for eternity?
6) Nature is not just on planet earth the whole observable universe and beyond it is part of nature as well.
You are completely missing his point. Its called the argument from ignorance. He's not saying it is or isnt, hes stating that we dont know, therefore we can speculate, and to do so is an argument from ignorance. Another form of this is "the god of the gaps" which states that when we dont know something, people insert god as the answer; its the same thing with UFO's, we dont know, therefore it must be aliens. Thats not how it works. It works as the following: You see an object and you dont know what it is, so you hypothesize that it could be aliens. That is where most people stop, but dont realize that "its aliens" is a hypothesis, and now you must collect evidence to prove its an alien. That is what Neil is talking about, you cant just say "I dont know what that is, it must be aliens", it doesnt work that way.
You know what happened when Bob Lazar saw a UFO he wanted to know how it flew now that's a real scientist who got balls
Bob Lazar is NOT a scientist
He's right on how we can't make any conclusions on whether they're aliens or some random plasma balls generated by reasons beyond our knowledge. What he should be interested about, is the way how these objects move. The object can sit still in 120 knot wind (the audio in the original clip, material here: www.navair.navy.mil/foia/documents) and fly at ridiculous speed - unaerodynamically - against the wind, while turning in a very awkward way. Another video released by pentagon "FLIR" shows how the object escapes the locked camera - which should not happen. The object zips suddenly on the "bottom left corner" and returns immediately back where it was. Then it smoothly slides away from the lock of the camera. According to Cmdr. David Fravor (one of the witnessing pilots), told in his interview that the velocity of that object was beyond our present technology as far as he knows. As a cosmologist, Neil should be interested of the way how these objects maneuver. If you have ever seen one with your own two eyes, I can tell you, it looks as if "they're defying the laws of physics(as we know them)". It's a biggest jaw drop your life. I'm not the only one who has seen these things. Also, I'm not one of those cooks who think anything that moves in the sky is an "alien ufo". What comes to the "ufo videos" here on youtube. They're crap. The only reasonable ufo videos I've seen, are these three videos released by pentagon. The maneuvers seen in the FLIR video is something I've seen myself.
ALIENS as we bluster about them with characteristic nonchalance,...may actually be living with us for thousands of years now, given their superior capabilities....... NASA must be hiding away everything.........these scientists are vouched to secrecy.....
@@suryanarayanabegur2026 If we take a step back and think about what we really know about aliens, is that our knowledge is based on pop-culture (hollywood movies), some ambiguous people who claim to "channel" alien information and pictures of an alien autopsy which can't be proven true or false. It's just a picture. Then we have ancient cultures telling stories of strange beings, but that's not enough to tell there are aliens here on earth. In order to say the UFOs are aliens or that aliens have been (or are) here on earth, we need a lot more than what we have know.
We need a new astrophysicist...
Yeah, one that doesn't follow the scientific method and will immediately say "ALIENS' when he sees something he doesn't recognize in the sky.
Acting like a jackass is following scientific method? I miss Carl Sagan
How is he acting like a jackass in this video?
i like NDT but he displays an unusual lack of curiosity when it comes to this subject.
Because he knows something....
Agreed. His total lack of curiosity confused me. He did not show up to discuss how this is an interesting sighting no matter what it is (atmospheric phenomena, foreign or domestic aircraft, little green men, etc.). He just laughed it off! Strange...
myself being a believer(saw a very large black triangle around 2007. ~400 ft. directly under it), has to conclude he knows something and somebody told him its an important secret. His overly dismissive attitude is kind of a tell that somethings is off. Could be wrong i suppose, but thats what it seems like
PArAdoX your first few words is all I need to estimate your IQ
He's a scientist, he can't do anything with the video. No one can.
The craft that we see is being thrown in our faces at how far behind we are, where we are supposed to be with technology.
Oh, so it's a _craft_ now?
Say it with me: *Unidentified*
@@Hairysteed that is because they keep putting labels on something that only needs to be called a disk or a craft. The inter dimensional beings don’t give them names like linear space craft that’s what it is, it is a math term; it was made up by the ones in power
@@Hairysteed they only say unidentified because they couldn’t comprehend how things like that is flying around and need physical names and science to figure that out when all you have to except is, craft of the inter dimensional beings that is powered by white gold and platinum. They are also not always piloted by them. They can operated elsewhere as a probe. The white gold and platinum part, and the fact that they can also manipulate the air molecules around the craft the craft to zip through air pockets in the atmosphere, is why they don’t make any sound.
@@hawaiiman33 omg you _still_ don't get it! Instead you keep making _even more_ assumptions about this thing you know nothing about!
@@Hairysteed it’s not an assumption they communicate with me, they’ve been in my house, and I communicate my Guardian Angel through mental telepathy.
“Unidentified flying object” that’s what they want him to say🤔
who are they 'they'?
koralite the government
Where did they go ?
What do they want from us ?
How strange that all of that information is in the Scriptures!
@@serenemountain6769
Continue to share the gospel of Christ.
Here are the facts:
The people perish because of ignorance/lack of knowledge.
There have always been spiritual life before the creation of earth. The Creator God, His Word(Christ). His Holy Spirit. His innumerable angels. His heavenly creatures. His heavenly vehicles(cherubim). His saints,the 24 Elders. His warrior angels. His heavenly hosts.
There are also "the fallen/satan and his angels(now called demons)who roam the lower heavens, the skies, the earth, under the earth, in the seas, and roaming also back and forth from the bodies of the wicked and ungodly humans, creating havoc, hate, abomination, chaos, evils, crimes, wars, etc on earth.
The world is being presently ruled by the 6th kingdom(king, empire, world power). Rome was the 5th kingdom. After the 6th, comes the seventh kingdom. Who will rule the world next? The Antichrist will appear some time during the 7th kingdom(king,empire,world power) rulership.
One day during the antichrist's rulership, Christ will return. We don't know specifically when, because Only God knows the exact date and time, but it is prophesied of Christ's imminent return.
There are innumerable terrestrial beings out there, aka satan and his legions of demons. Some of the most realistic things are the things that cannot be seen.
It is written, that "God did not give us a spirit of fear, but of Love, Power, and a Sound Mind."
Fear is a tactic of satan(who is the temporary unofficial god of this earth, which he stole the ownership from Adam).
However, there is One who is greater than all of satan and his minions combined.
The Creator God, is Greater, Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and who will one day come in the clouds, with His innumerable heavenly hosts/warrior angels to rage war on satan, demons, sin, death, hell, and the grave.
There are no such things as aliens, there will be no alien invasion, that's a fact. However, Christ is coming back to take what is rightfully His. Amen!
No one will be able to prevent or stop Christ's imminent return. All weapons will be like toys against Him. No space force will be able to intercept Him.
He will defeat all with just His words.
If you can believe in aliens, who don't exist, then you can believe in what I just told you.
If you have not accepted Christ as your Lord and Savior, you should while you still have time.
USA is that present empire. When her reign is finally over, as predestined. The next king/kingdom/empire will arise. Who will reign as the next world super power? I don't know. We will see.
Secure you future in Christ, the giver of eternal life, salvation, where there is no sorrow, no pain, no sickness, no disease, no wars, no hate, no death.
Only Christ's Kingdom will rule on earth, as it is in heaven, for all eternity. in The New Earth there will be no suffering.
Only Christ's Kingdom will be the only Kingdom that remains from everlasting to everlasting.
When you have come to the Truth, share these words.
@@annmyann437 tl;dr
but I've seen you said something about fallen angels... angles who rebelled agains omniscient and omnipotent god... ye... that makes perfect sense...
i think most people are shit scared to imagine this is actually for real. Is it? I have no clue. But from what the pilot and other credible people on this mission said, it could well be true.
Government just said it is true so there's that
@Yesmer Proof?
He is clearly nervous. The unknown is no reason to joke. The object is there. It's real. It has no known propulsion system, it flies faster than any human machine. What's so funny about that? This is serious. Very serious.
Tyson brings up a good point, “Everyone has a camera” so why don’t we have more self shot footage from civilians?
There are thousands of sightings a year. Hundreds of videos. They exist. Maybe you're not looking for them. Or you're just dismissive of what you do come across.
@@AnunnakiAaron I need 4K color and up close, not grainy footage and 2-10 miles away. I don’t think that’s an unreasonable ask. 🤷🏻♂️
@@AnunnakiAaron Nome of them are real and notice how there’s so many but no actual alien videos and plus aliens can’t get to earth is psychically impossible by laws of psychics.
@@sha3755 why would it be impossible by the laws of physics?
@@sha3755 and why would there be "alien" videos?
3:25 have you ever tried to zoom your iPhone camera on something in the sky? A plane or a kite flying around? Fuzzy and shaky. It doesn't matter how good your phone camera is. There are plenty of crap phone videos of these phenomena.
That was taken by the government
@mal m I don’t know your dad
The government is paying him to make fun of UFOs
Nah, he's just a useful idiot.
The government did seem to have a hand in that in general though. For example, guess who once bought up a run-down regional newspaper and turned it into a national tabloid running *preposterous* articles related to the UFO phenomenon? Right, a CIA psychological warfare agent who renamed it The National Inquirer. And that is just instance of the government working to discredit the phenomenon. Internally (i.e. the military etc.) there is even more direct evidence than that.
"The government is paying him to make fun of UFOs"
Of course. He is also on Reptilians and Illuminati payroll. There are rumours that Aliens are giving him a big amount of 24-carat gold they've harvested for him in Universe as well.
palmhillvilla1 Yet someone allowed the release of the DOD video in the first place? Those 2 things don't go together
maybe it's UFO paying him :P
Instead of asking ¿Is out there any intelligent life besides us?, I may ask instead: ¿Are “we” intelligent enough to ask that?
This was great. He basically laughed at alien believers
Niel’s number one rule? Never let anyone else talk.
Pretty funny the Navy just proved you wrong
Except they didn't...they just said it was "unidentified" you loser.
@@Julie.Canada no now they're"off planet" loser. Lol
@@Julie.Canada Except the pilots who witnessed it first hand and filmed it...ofc the official report will remain PC and neutral...they don't want to create panic and seem utterly incapable against these things.
@@anthonyw9129 Hi Anthony....sorry please correct me if I’m wrong, but I think you’ll find that the jury’s still out on that point. We in the UFO community (if you want to call it that) are still waiting some sort of announcement from government possibly along the lines that the US is in possession of material ‘not made on this planet’ or words to that effect. Dr.Eric Davis may or may not be playing a part in this. So far Dec 2020 it still hasn’t come. There could well be a report from senate intel committee coming in 2021. I saw a saucer in the 7o’s so I KNOW there’s meat on the bones of all this...however as of now it is fair to say that the ‘Phil Larson declaration’ issued out by Obama/Biden administration in 2011 has not been overturned yet.
Journalist Question: What do you think there is intelligent life out there?
Neil deGrasse Tyson Answer: I would first start that question on earth.
nattiy 535 ... based on the majority of the comments posted here, I'd say "No!"
Judging by the comments on this video I'd have to agree with Neil here
aliens probably visited us before there was life here and they thought it was boring and are never coming back
He isn’t not too afraid to look stupid or bending to social pressures; it’s called enacting proper skepticism. He’s not saying that there’s no alien carbon-based life out there; he’s merely waiting for independent confirmation of what these objects are...and that’s the correct thing to do
Don't know if its alien or not but realize the military is always 30-40 years ahead in technology then what the American public knows about. Just try Googling "Skunk Works" to see what I mean.
no no no, its aliens 'cause I've seen 'em in movies and that's what I wanna _believe_
real life is boring
sarcasm ^
XIPHIASCDXX
Stupidity^
Carlton Banks
lol, yes you do appear to be stupid. Good job!
XIPHIASCDXX Hello friend!
So the military spent 22 million to identify their own aircraft?
Actually there are some good phone videos that captured aircraft that's pretty clear. And mass sightings of witnesses, like the Arizona lights ufo
There are tons of clear footage
Justin Norton yeah but this conceited prick wouldn't dare view any of that evidence.
I would bet you a million dollars that if a real alien spacecraft were to be captured by 4K cameras up close then most people who'd see that footage would say "HAH!! That's the fakest bullshit I've ever seen in my life. There's no way that's real."
+Julianne Mc I totally agree. Well said.
A mysterious aircraft does not equal evidence of a Alien though does it, tons of secret aircraft were worked on during the Cold War and we now know that US intellegence planted a few UFO stories to cover projects they worked on then, no reason to believe that doesn't happen today.
Didnt the pilots say that the objects move at inhumane speeds and turn in physically impossible ways
Why are you asking him ?
Even he doesn't know.
He should try to know ♥️
Isn't he a "physicist"
Now what he will say?
He dont know anymore than you and l and that's Nothing about UFOs