[4k, 60 fps] Apollo 16 Lunar Rover "Grand Prix" (1972 April 21, Moon)
Vložit
- čas přidán 17. 02. 2020
- An upscaled and resounded version of Apollo 16 mission "Grand Prix" part:
FPS boosted to 60 frames per second;
Image resolution boosted up to 4k.
You can reach me here:
💌 shir-man.com
Source for upscaling:
• The Apollo 16 LRV Gran...
______
Please, keep in mind that 4k resolution playback mostly not available on phones.
#Moon #Upscale #1972 - Krátké a kreslené filmy
![[60 fps] Laborers in Victorian England, 1901](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5HbElEqm1TQ/mqdefault.jpg)
1911 to 1972 Is all the time it took to go from people still traveling by carriage to landing on the moon. That’s just 1 life span
The damaged parts of the tape are when the aliens ran in front of the camera.
i think it's was
flies
I would imagine it's for something they didn't want us to see, props, a bird, a plane etc
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 direct evidence this shit is a bunch of bologna
/s
It wasnt tape. Film
@@Carl_Aznable disagree
2020: *turning old footage in 60 fps 4K*
2200: *turning modern footage into a fully interactive hologram*
in 3-4 years we will see this again in 4K live-streamed from the moon
Paying billion of dollars to play Mario kart on the moon. Thats what i call a job
Now is time for some JFK footage
CIA did it. He didnt want to run wars for money.
Jacek M CIA covered it up, they hired mob hit men
JFK? How about some Eisenhower footage. The guy that created the space program.
back and to the left.
9/11? Would be cool to upscale the only known footage of the first plane hitting.
"Ok max stop!"
"Ok I dont wanna do that."
"Ok excuse me."
I would a been like, “Yo man it’s my turn now!”
That moon dust is so fine. I imagine it would get everywhere and ruin all modern electronics.
It DID get everywhere. It's fine and sticky and clung to their space suits. They had to brush it off before climbing back into the LM, but they never managed to get rid of much of it. A real mess.
@@MrWhipple42 Also inhaled it after coming back inside and some of them got a lunar "fever". Not good for the lungs.
@@GoldenPrune *I understood that reference*
One would think with the lack of gravity the space dust cloud would become massive and blur out the entire surrounding area but instead it gently splashes back down around the wheels almost like earth gravity in slow motion ... but what do i know ...
@@moonwvlf6919 They're on the Moon, you dolt. There is gravity, roughly 1/6th that of Earth's... But what do I know?
I watched much of this live in black and white when I was a kid. Still amazing to watch today!
ok boomer
Absolutely incredible, can you imagine the Apollo film that could be made if this was done to all the footage, unreal!
There isn't that much that was shot on film. The film reels were fairly short. The Apollo 11 EVA shot from the LM was set to one frame per second to allow for a longer film.
Most of the videos from Apollo that you see are shot on video so don't look nearly as good as the ones shot on film.
The human race, first time landing on something that isn't earth... rips skids in a space car.
5th time landing.
1st time? Lol
Its fake bro
@@ChuckBeefOG You're a fake bro
I'm pretty sure the first thing they did was draw a penis on the moon's surface but it wasn't filmed. I mean, I would.
Plz! Upscale METROPOLIS!. And now is copyright free!.
There's already a HD transfers out there. You could interpolate it though
@ECHO-IA2 行列ガーリー120 Hz Thats rite!
Yes, PLEASE! Apparently they also found some long lost footage a few years back.
Some machine learning upscaling
Apparantly the metropolis film was made in an previous era of humanity, the stories of it being made in 1929 are just that, stories.
Moon looks like a desert
What a fantastic restoration to a 50 year film. Kudos to whomever done this
It's funny how people are making this awesome remasterizations of historical videos while there are others on Instagram making they high quality 4K perfect focused and stabilized videos look like old vintage crappy clips by adding filters. People are weird.
Amazing how they all managed to fit in with the car in the tiny lander.
It folded up. www.collectspace.com//review/ap15-S71-31409.jpg
Yeh it folded up like a little meccano car and the wheels where wire wound, I think it was great engineering feat but ultimately pointless more of a marketing gimmick for tv at the time. The astronauts where never going to go out of sight of the lander as they could of got easily gotten lost on a featureless landscape.
@@gower1973 I assume moving around on foot was pretty difficult for them though, what with the weaker gravity and stiffness of those big bulky spacesuits. At least the buggy mitigated that issue.
@@gower1973 Not likely with two excellent reference points available, the sun and the earth.
Спасибо за качественную обработку. Теперь вообще хорошо видно, что там сидит кукла с неподвижной и неестественно застывшей левой рукой:)
У таксистов точно так же бывает, выствит локоть в окошко и ездит! И не шевелит!
Who came here to read the comments?
Amazing how you've interpolated so much information from the original footage, Denis. Felt really immersive.
How did they fit the buggy onto the capsule?
You can request next video for an upscale in this thread ✨
Apollo 11
Hindenburg
"modern time "
"voyage sur la lune" Georges Méliés
Жду апскейл картинок на DTF
Thank you for doing this. It’s incredible.
Amazing your work on upscaling these videos. Good job
Tape damaged I'm pretty sure is when the astronauts said something like
'Holy fucking shit dude we're driving a go kart on the fucking moon'
Your channel is truly incredible, Denis.
Excellent, the stabilization made this the best example of Apollo footage I've seen. The landscape was the clearest I've ever seen it! Thanks!!
all i saw previously was a pixelated retro video, which i also had uploaded to one of my Docu channels. but your video is just on another level, this is stunning work and amazing piece of history on so many levels. THANK YOU lol, guys appreciate this !!!
Anyone fakers noticed that the gravity is SLOW here? 😂 The dust is settling far slower than expected on earth 🌍. So either they really were on the moon or just tuned down the gravity in that studio!
That, and it doesn't linger in the air as dust does on Earth... Because there's no air to linger in, since the Moon lacks an atmosphere.
@@NoelistAvenger or slow down the tape
I was today years old when I found out that humans drove a car on the moon. Why don't people talk about this much?
Looking at this make me realize how crazy this must have felt......to be the first human or living being in general, to stand on this moon. The first time to stand on solid ground, while also not standing on earth.
Driving on the fucking moon, how did the public back then got bored of this?
"Okay Max stop!" .. "Ok I don't wanna do that" .. "Okay excuse me" lol
It's incredible how much fun he's having lol
you're onto something with these improved videos! don't stop...more plz :)
Эх... сейчас бы сесть в свою космическую девятку, включить M83 на полную и проехаться по родным необъятным просторам Луны...
Или Кавинского )
Автомобили портят экологию! Нужен лунный велосипед!
Хмм, почему не догадались велосипед на луну взять?
В Космича надо садиться, в космича!
@@Delv.Kosigan надо тогда горный брать
@@Delv.Kosigan правильно! Нечего лунный вакуум выхлопами загрязнять, там и так уже дышать нечем)
There were folks driving around on the moon on the day I was born. My mind just made a backflip.
Great work! Thank you. Love how chill John Young is and also the contrasting enthusiasm of Charle's Duke.
FYI, during the launch of their Saturn V, Young's heart rate was at a steady 70bpm. Charles Duke's was 144bpm.
Why you know things? Embrace the void and infinte nothingness. Be still. Quiet. It's best.
Young must've had nerves of steel; if I was sitting on top of a giant missile about to be shot into space, I certainly wouldn't feel very calm !
Almost as if they're in a comfortable safe sound recording studio.
@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 If your heartbeat reaches 145bpm in a "comfortable safe sound recording studio", you'd better go see a cardiologist.
This is amazing ! Thanks a million 🙏🏻👍🏻
2:43 Посмотрел в конце сравнение с оригиналом, думал там шакалы будут, а они 40 лет назад сняли лучше, чем сейчас некоторые снимают.
А вообще молодцы, J-mission это конечно важно, но покатушки на вездеходе никто не отменял)
Хасселблад норм камеры, че сказать)
40 лет назад?
Ну так это миссия стоила огромных денек, поэтому и сняли хорошо
@Zephir2000 Надо ещё раз слетать, срочно в 8к переснять :)
I watched them land on the moon in 1969 when I was eleven yrs. old on my grandma's tv live with the rest of the world, never forget it. Saw JFK get assinated on live tv when I was 5 yrs. old on the same tv. Sad.
I would prefer if you didn't add music and it was just the original audio.
LOL. Good one.
@@mada1241 ?
The music makes it almost unwatchable.
Why does every video maker feel that there must be music under everything? Original audio is much more interesting.
So well edited. Thank you
I didn't know they had music on the moon
It's blackspeech. From the same artist that played the universe.
Well, firstly, how come do you figure out that is on the moon but not just in the desert in the moonlight?
You don't know alot about the moon
@@anastasiakudrina9150 You can figure that out on it's own by the fact that we see no stars or blue colours in the sky despite there being absolutely no light pollution in a desert.
@@anastasiakudrina9150 weaker gravity
"Wanna turn around John?" Charlie Duke thinking, "Please don't hit the freaking Command Module."
Being able to watch this historical tape with such quality really astonishes me.
Estupendo trabajo Denis. Gracias!...
This is incredible! My congratulations for such a beautiful job!
Amazing job!! Loved it! 👏
Как было бы прекрасно, если Луна бы была второй Землёй. Смотрели бы друг-друга в телескоп, летали бы туда-сюда кто имеет деньги.
Your videos are fascinating, I'd love to see an old London upscaled, that would be fantastic.
Thank you keep up the marvelous work!
Keep this content coming!!!!
Damn, the new Space Engineers update looks so cool! Nice work Keen!
Bealtifull! Awsome! Incredible! I was out of breath 😱 It is interesting how it shows in detail, 4k and 60fps, the man in -Area 51- Moon🌜
Здорово видно, как реголит с колес сыпется при малом движении и когда ускоряется выбрасывает в луносферу:)
I have no words... just thanks!
Look closely at the regolith pulled up by the rear tires of the lunar rover and you will see the 'fanning' or 'feathering' effect that could only occur in a low gravity environment like the lunar surface. Pretty cool!
This is wonderful. Such a great piece of history to upscale. Bravo!!!
I love Kubrick films!!
magic10rm
Me too. SO why did you bring that up? Seems kind of random.
@@tqnohe It's an old joke. _When NASA realized they couldn't land on the moon, they hired Stanley Kubrick to film a fake moon mission. Unfortunately for them, Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he insisted they film on location._
Laughing Gravy
I know the joke. And the BS moon landing deniers’ claims.
The the very fact that Neil Armstrong apparently flubbed his big line show it wasn’t Kubrick. That guy would have done 50 takes to get it right.
I am Armstrong. No l am Armstrong. No I am Armstrong...........etc. .
@@tqnohe That's a very good point actually, I'll make sure to remember that whenever I see another one of those "fake dis wuz filmd by stenly rubik!!1" guys.
Those pitch black shadows (due to lack of atmosphere) fascinate me every time I see a footage of moon.
Beautiful. I'm so upset that so much original footage was overwritten.
I hope we get to see the next moon/Mars landing soon. We should really be working toward it harder as a species.
Martin C
NO original footage was overwritten. LEarn something.
@@tqnohe Was it even magnetic tape that could be over written? I thought it was good old celluloid. Can't overwrite that.
@Some One Film? The footage I'm talking about was recieved via radio signals and recorded onto analog magnetic data tapes. The magnetic tapes can be degaussed and magnetically reset to be reused.
@@curicmc The only think over written was the slow scan (10 frame per second) black and white video from Apollo 11. But nothing was lost since all of it was recorded after being converted to standard NTSC for broadcast.
The video shown here was shot on 16 mm color film.
Thank you very much for these wonderful videos.
14 seconds in, and i'm already in awe
It was an electric car with an electric motor in each wheel ! 🤯
Dust lolzzzzzzz NASA is fake
guy on comms: make a sharp turn!!
john: i have no desire to make a sharp turn
lmao this is amazing
Спасибо, более отчётливо видно, что пыль затормозившись об атмосферу, падает вертикально вниз. И в конце видно как воздушным потоком, пыль увлекается следом за ровером. На Луне таки есть атмосфера ! Нобелевскую премию мне, срочно.
А ты покажи как на каком нибудь ралли пыль ведет себя так же.
WOW! Simply amazing fantastic cosmic colors!
This is extremely nice. "A long time coming" but it's very nice this was made. A large improvement of what people are used to seeing and have seen!! (the 're-sounded' part is good...delightful...and the camera in the hand movement parts are good as well!!)
спасибо за отличное видео, искал старый футаж который удалили с ютуба, а теперь он мне рекомендует это видео - чудеса.
Awesome sauce!!!! Thanks much for posting!!! :) :) :) :)
Fantastic work! Keep doing it!
can you do WW2 footage upscale?
And name a good reason for that? Just one?
@@agerven Curiosity
@@IntelTV Curiosity can be satisfied by the huge amount of footage available (which i confirm should be preserved in some digital form, although most already is).
agerven What would be a reason NOT to? Im curious.
@@smith507 Anything WWS2 related It's the content what matters, as long as its a good recording of audio and video. I'd directly go for an autited improvement in case audio was inaudible or incomprehensible.
I just found your channel, and I feel like I have to tell you that this gave me chills and that I'm crying from amazement. It was so clear. The view point, camera and resolution are all so perfect to where I felt like you could bend down and pick up a rock. I never knew it was so totally dusty and sandy. I know it's silly, but if you had water you could probably build a sand castle on the moon. Just imagine being there. In all my 22 years, I've never saw a POV video of the moon. Really if we wipe away all our cultural notions, its quite ugly land, gray and almost nothing but dirt, not even rocky land. But it's so beautiful how it's a dead massive rock floating around our planet. That we worked hard enough and got enough money to send regular but smart people to this massive orb in our sky. That every foot print will always be there. That all those prints the moon buggy made in '72 are still there.
It's fascinating how quickly the dust falls back to the ground in the vacuum.
Lol
@@ph.d.r3334 So...dust falling quickly in a vacuum because there's no air resistance is...funny?
@@blue3media I thought it should fall like in slow motion
@@blue3media Gravity on the Moon is 6 times lower, so yeah, it's funny to see how they try to pass it off as real Moon, not some Airforce depressurized dome on Earth.
Okey Dokey.
Wow! Love your stuff
Millions years of evolution;
Tens of tousands of men involved;
The most incredible acheivement in human history;
The rise of AI technologie;
And after all that, all the sacrifices, all the time spend, all the efforts done...
CZcams randomly shift the vid to 144 for no god damn reason.
Evolution.
This is your daily dose of Recommendation
Apollo mission footage upscaled Interpolated
Amazing! Magical! Subscribed.... 😎
Driving around in the moon must be so fucking dope
Technically he's not even off road since roads only exist in earth.
The logistics involved in getting the rover from Earth to the moon is something I can’t fathom but it’s a true sign of ingenuity!
Love these old films being upscaled! Imagine if we had the technology we have today back then...
Look at how the texture of the ground immediately changes from detailed in the fore, to fuzzy (low resolution) in the background.
how the F u get all this old ass videos man btw i like them man they some kind of chilling and knowing how the early lifestyle was is awesome thx for the uploads.
I'm glad Alan Watts got to see humanity go to the moon before he passed away in 1972
Amazing work. 👍👍
This is so amazing. Thank you
на луне дорог как не было так и нет!😁
The most expensive kart racing in history.
US 60s technology at the best generation, piece of cake to drive on moon.
amazing!
I don't get how people can say that this footage "looks fake" when the way the dust behaves (falling back down immediately instead of staying up in the air) would only be possible in a place where there's no air at all... Such as the Moon.
Or maybe under water?
People don't say that the footage is fake, they say that it wasn't filmed on The Moon.
Take some heavy-particle dust (like powdered iron or rust) and see how it behaves in Earth's atmosphere. It'll settle down even faster than the one on the video.
BUT.
The thing is - it shouldn't fall down faster than on Earth in the first place. It should stay airborne LONGER than on Earth, and it has nothing to do with air pressure, but with gravity.
Moon's gravity is 17% of that on Earth. So if you take a ball of lead and drop it from 10 feet on Earth and on Moon, it will take 2,5 times longer to fall on the Moon. That's because S=a*t^2 formula, which nixes the difference pretty hard.
But 17% comes into full play when it comes to negating inertia of upward-bound objects, like dust that's being thrown from under rover's wheels. It takes SIX TIMES as long for dust to start falling down on Moon than on Earth. So the wheels should produce veritable fountains of dust riding with such speed.
When we compare fountains, we can pretty much ignore the atmosphere factor. While it helps particles stay afloat longer, it also hampers upward movement; thus, for fountain's longevity, it can pretty much be ignored.
@Mark Aim They didn't "lose" the tech as in "whoops, we don't know where the blueprints are, bummer !", it's lost because it's outdated. Seriously, it's already been explained several times; it's 70's tech we're talking about, what would be the point of building a 70's rocket today instead of starting from scratch to develop something safer, more advanced and adapted to today's standards ?
Those guys explained it better : www.quora.com/How-is-it-that-NASA-lost-the-technology-to-go-to-the-moon-It-blew-my-mind-when-NASA-said-this
@@Inieel
The dust is going up real high to me.
it looks like they can fall off the edge the blackness is spooky as hell
This channel is cool as hell man
Breathtaking!
Beautiful.
this is so cool!
Cool channel you have here, Denis. I just subscribed. 👍
Thank You!