DALL-E is coming... World-changing AI image generator
VloĆŸit
- Äas pĆidĂĄn 27. 08. 2024
- OpenAI just announced a new AI Text-to-Image model based on GPT-3 called DALL-E 2. It is capable of turning a text description into a unique image or work of art that has never been seen before.
#ai #tech #TheCodeReport
đ Resources
DALL-E openai.com/dal...
Announcement Tweet / 1511724264629678084
Sam Altman Blog blog.samaltman...
đ„ Get More Content - Upgrade to PRO
Upgrade to Fireship PRO at fireship.io/pro
Use code lORhwXd2 for 25% off your first payment.
đš My Editor Settings
- Atom One Dark
- vscode-icons
- Fira Code Font
đ Topics Covered
- How does AI generate Art?
- What is DALL-E?
- How does DALL-E Work?
- How does GPT-3 Work?
- What is the future of AI?
I have the feeling that in about a month or two, you'll release a video revealing your past month of uploads was generated automatically, that you trained an AI to mimic your personality and editing style and made videos with it.
He already declared that if you watched "This video is made with Code but how?"
I had this exact thought earlier today before I even saw this video. I was thinking to myself.. how does his voice sound so human, yet so robotic? OMG he talks like that so we'll never know it when he seamlessly switches out his actual voice for an AI version of it. But seriously, his voice is way too predictable to be real. We're already being duped.
ahahahah except that would require a shit ton of everything, for training and use, as every good ai does
NileGreen is a parody channel of NileRed that has studied NileRed's voice and uses AI to make it say anything in his voice. This has been going on for years now
I'm convinced that Two Minute Paper's voice is AI generated, if you go back a few years in their upload their intonation is fuller but recent uploads specifically the "and"s feel and sound exactly the same to me.
Fireship has become my favorite news source. 100% satisfied I subscribed.
Two Minute Papers makes a lot of content like this (including on this topic a few years ago). Recommend you give them a look.
Already subscribed
@@Jacodoodle "Hold on to your papers!"
Lol đ can't wait to see ai become my wife
Same. I've learned so much. Insta-sub
For a company called âOpenâAI has the most restrictive projects ever
This kind of technology would be pretty dangerous in the hands of spambots, scammers and trolls, so they kinda have to restrict it for now.
"""Open"""AI only cares about corporate interests, they don't care weather there are "bad actors", they give their tech to some of the most evil companies such as Microsoft. They should really just change their name to something else.
They were open AI in the beginning. Then they changed to 'for profit ai' and sold out to Microsoft. GPT-3 licenses were expensive and hard to come by until competition forced them to open it up two years later. Expect the same with Dall-E 2.
@@michaelnurse9089 Initial access to GPT-3 never cost money but otherwise yes
@@Flackon This technology is already widely available and open sourced. VQGAN+CLIP, Dall-E one, Pytti 5, Disco Diffusion, Glide fine-tuning, and an open source implementation of Dall-E 2 will soon be released. Almost all of this has existed for years with "little" negative impact.
*"a ship sailing through a sea of fire"* was actually a really cool image, I wish I could see it in a bigger image
As a software engineer, I get nervous sometimes when I think about AI taking over my career (or my girlfriend's business as a photographer!). But realistically, if government policy keeps up with the pace at which companies are rolling this stuff out, this is actual better for humanity. I'd rather write little games and algorithms in code in my free time then program dumb angular components for a business. Really what I should be worried about is the things that AI is actually going to cause harm... like Tiktok and Facebook AI's manipulating entire generations of people on geopolitical matters.... YIKES! Good stuff though. Makes me think :P
Government policy? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH........
AI could save government a lot of money, I don't think they would fight against progress
People will keep blaming capitalism for losing jobs even though AI is the main reason for it.
Don't worry! An army of big-ai lawyers will swiftly kill or water down any such legislation as they did to every climate change policy, worker rights, and more.
@@rumplstiltztinkerstein Don't blame me for tax fraud! The pen was the main reason!
No AI can make code reports like these, they just keep getting better, well done
who's going to tell him?
Never say never - Justin Bieber
How do you know?
We're pretty much f*cked already.
LOL It's not too long now before an AGI will be able to do this...
The human factor in creating things is still relatively far from machines and AI to accomplish, the uncertainty and randomness of the human nature still can't be teached, maybe we will see it in our life time but using it to its full potential outside of the "tool context" shouldn't be a thing to worry about yet. Although it is scary what is being showed already.
This is truly fascinating. I agree with your initial thoughts, although I am curious to see what this tool can do in the hands of the right people. Think of the enormous amount of creative possibilities of being able to combine all these different parameters together. This technology can be frightening because it can threaten peoples jobs or companies, but it could lead to a whole new era of creative freedom.
The creative potential is amazing
I could finally make my own anime! ... probs not tho ...
Imagine for indie game development, where there's just one dev that know how to code and create everything that requires programming, like the mechanics and gameplay, and even things like the history, but sucks a drawing and design the characters and other visual elements of the game.
Until it falls in the hands of the wrong people
Open AI needs to be stopped
Those results are so much more clean, natural, and accurate than I thought was even several years out. Transformer models never cease to amaze with their ability to scale with data
Damn..! Imaging giving your night dreams as text and generating an image
I think this will break reality
Try to formulate a dream. We're safe.
@@leoingson Nope. Japanese scientist (if I am correct, I seen visuals, not sure what country/an asian one) have been working on a brain scan which translates it into visuals. They could see glimpes of what people were dreaming/thinking about.
@@manoukirishanning DALL-E works on text. That was the point of my smirk ;)
Check out 2 minutes paper. He covers this quite extensively. CLIP and GPT-3 were already a breakthrough technology before, now that DALL E 2 has come existence and unified both as we as its own tech. This is insanely powerful
Canât wait for the season finale reveal that Jeff has been an AI sent back in time to cover itself being developed over the years just to meme on us.
Extra creepy watching this video now as I am halfway through Season FOUR of Person Of Interest (when [spoiler] is completely in control of [spoiler]!)
There is no "Maybe", we WILL see you in another Code Report. This was so good!
So far, AI is really, really, really good at taking a prompt and interpreting it with a data set (like most computer programs, in general). And if it keeps on in that direction, I think itâs gonna be an insanely scary way for machines to do every kind of input-output work (art, music, code, etc)
But I donât think this is anywhere close to AGI, if we think of AGI as a machine that can learn for itself or have any awareness of what itâs doing.
Just wait for AIs to start feeding one another their creations. Not even LSD will give you that ;)). Being serious, AI is good for stuff where there is large error margin allowed and nothing more. We are still better at avoiding errors, magnitudes better ...
@@swojnowski453 but how long will that lasts...
Agree, but also, AI can't _actually_ code. Like, at all. Unless your standard for 'coding' is 'copying and posting snippets from SO' but we all know how _that_ goes.
@@Rokinso Eliminating those marginal errors is extremely difficult. The reason is there is very few data on them, so AIs can't learn from a proper data set. The whole thing is even harder to crack because nobody know what's going on in the black box the AIs are. Even small AIs pose this problem. So what's the solution? Do not wait for things to happen quick. They won't.
@@NilesBlackX true, I mean i could see AI doing it, but not in the way that we usually approach AI problem solving (give it a dataset and let it run). It's gonna need a way more modular and strict way to turn prompts into code
Wow... As a developer who hates to draw images I was waiting for something like this! Probably it's also very useful for illustration in web pages. I can't wait. Is there any way to join the beta?
pay people ffs
@@immurecreations yeye cause that's something everyone can do for every project, it's always worth paying someone to do it instead of using free tools at your disposal to do it yourself.
â@@immurecreations When industries change you can only rely on that sentiment for so long. Video stores lasted for years after better video serving models emerged, but one by one they closed until none left. There will be a version 3 of Dall-E that can give you a set of files (for $5...) - fonts, clipart's, logo, web elements etc that normally get from a developer.
@@immurecreations I stopped paying for horse carriages too
@@dylanclarke9497 if you donât want to pay, do it yourself on all the free software out there. These tools will be the downfall of actual skill.
Artists are already struggling to survive these days, this is the start of killing them off
I loved this channel since I joined about 4 years ago and I still loved it, especially with the addition of news
I was using copilot for a project and I was working on a feature and I was thinking about how to implement the feature and suddenly copilot showed me the whole implementation, I was blown away. Even though I had to make few changes to its suggestion. It was impressive.
Best part about this is probably that authors will use this to create their illustrations of textbooks/workbooks/novels/comics. And looking at tech such as the one nvidia used to render 2d images to 3d scenes, we can probably create concept art a lot faster and better.
You can create custom art to hang on your walls - one of a kind!
there goes my dreams and work to become a concept artist
edit: though realistically, i can say it could actually cut a good portion of my work.
and the ai also probably wouldn't have creativity.
because to be honest most jobs I've had rely on you knowing what you're doing.
a lot of the times the customer/commission/art director would ask you to do one thing but in reality they really need something else that they just don't have enough experience in the skill set to know yet.
so probably fine actually.
@@coins_png As a multimedia designer you can focus on UX.
That was my first thought: Light Novel Illustrations.
I wonder if the AI can stick to a consistent style.
I just love the way the content is mixed with a sense of strong humor đ
He just nervous laughing because very, very soon this AI will start CZcams channel dedicated to fast food videos of firebase, the N new JS framework and some similar non sensing things ;)
@@vasiovasio đ
I have to wonder just how this will affect copyright. It's like... is a creative work even mine when I just had an AI create it for me? Are the rights owned by the AI developer? A mix of both?
Since the AI uses work of other people its more like you would have to credit everyone who made the pictures that the AI used to learn
@@rafradeki Sounds a lot like what humans already do for "inspiration"
@@rafradeki I think that would be ridiculous. It's using 40000 years of art history that part would have to be taken care of for you as part of the generated image or not at all, I'm sure there's hundreds of images it'll "use" a pixel from, I wouldn't expect to have to credit someone for that.
The test is not whether it is 'yours'. If you draw your completely 'original version' of Mickey Mouse it is copyright infringement. Like all copyright it is going to depend on the enforcement power of the plaintiff and who is the enforcer. Do some Disney/Marvel AI pics and put it somewhere visible and see what happens next - the will come after you with lawyers. If you have millions you can fight them and then a judge may get to decide.
@@michaelnurse9089 Yeah that's a situation on the opposite end of what I was saying, you're saying if someone plagiarises a picture they can get in trouble for it, which is pretty obvious to me. I'm saying that that if it uses 10000 different images to make mine, that's in essence the same as an artist using parts of everything they've ever seen as inspiration to draw something. Purposefully drawing something to the same/similar to an already copyrighted material is wildly different than using those materials to create something new and original.
2:38
How many times have humanity said AI won't do a certain thing but end up completing that task in a few years or decades
the opposite has happened constantly as well
@@fedyx1544 ay fair point
i love the end lmao "I will see you at the next one, maybe..." xd
As a graphic designer and illustrator I have never felt uncomfortable as I have felt after learning about this technology. It feels like this will make our jobs easier at first, but then with general artificial intelligence, all humanity will be obsolete.
AI will eventually replace all jobs so humans can just focus on existing and being happy. There is really no escape
The ship sailing through a see of fire image was awesome!!
Man I still got 6 years of education to go through and when I'm finished everything will be replaced by AI or a nuclear landscape
Why 6 years?
@@Chni-3andk2 years of High school + 4 years of Software engineer in University
Honestly, this is terrifying.
Many people derive their sense of meaning from their work. This is quickly being taken away.
Peope spent years shaping their skills and now an AI can do it much better. I wonder what this means for humans on a larger scale.
Yeah sorry for being a downer but these times are coming more quickly than imagined.
you dont even know a thing about ai. go back watching your average hollywood movie that tells you that robot bad because rebel
Meh, I'm always on the side of making more things possible through technology. For every person displaced countless others are enabled to do better cooler things.
that's just imposter syndrome.
there will always be someone out there doing things you are doing, only much better.
always has been. if you let that define you, it's on you.
Isn't telling the AI what to do is a work of art? I mean AI can't do sh*t if you didn't describe what you want to get.
@@taktuscat4250 for now -
AGI would probably be here sooner that we think as well
Seems like a super easy tool to mass generate NFT of a single theme or maybe a more useful purpose of creating art assets references for games etc.
this.
so, when are you fully automating your channel using voice cloning, Remotion + Copilot, GPT-3, and DALL-E?
This is the best series ever
AI has already made many jobs obsolete and is well on its way to replacing pilots doctors soldiers and "of course us programmers.
"Future: AI is hiring human engineers
Hmm I wonder if that's possible. Like genuinely interested in making an AI that can hire people.
Then we can rest and let them do the work
@@Kyle-xk2rb we kinda have, you just give it some criteria and base on those it gives you the result
i also have seen ai recruiting agencies, they simply analyze your video call interview
@@yaverjavid not really, companies would still be in hands of rich people, they wouldn't have used AI and machines if they wanted to give away their money. It is just another way of greed and poor people like us would still have to figure out a way for making money while "almost" every job position is occupied by AI.
AI would only hire AI not humans lol
how do we know you're not an AI already? :O
how do we know you're not?
@@theterribleanimator1793 i successfully clicked all the crosswalks in the captcha
@@_ZeroCool_ Good enought, welcome to the resistanceâą brother.
Fun fact: because no human created the image, copyright doesnât apply and all images generated by this program are in the public domain. Copyright requires human involvement.
Wait until these companies change the copyright laws so it also applies to AIs
Crazy time to be alive. We might actually live to see AGI
Imagine a speech to text to a series of corelated image generation giving instant AI movie pre-viz just by narrations
With such a big image set wouldn't it be possible for the AI to accidentally violate copyright on images that are marked incorrectly as non-copyrighted?
2:50 the beat switch
My mouth was open throughout this entire video
Humans now: AI is going to replace us in every job.
AI in future: We are growing some humans, they can replace us in every job.
If that happens we will be stuck in an endless loop like Ouroboros
That's almost the Matrix.
There will still be a market for genuine, human-made content, just like there being a market today for homemade items after the machines automated production.
True. But a corporation doesn't care if their logo designer has a beating heart. I highly doubt human appreciation of art pays the bills just as well. We need to start fighting for UBI now, so in 3 years we won't starve thanks to another research paper.
đđđ
@@rkvkydqf As i said, the market will be like homemade. Coporations will seek automation, and some humans will keep tradition alive. Yes, we need a UBI Now.
Great video! Love how straight to the point they are. Just a side note - there's a small typo error on the thumbnail. Thanks for your work!
No one cares about that damn typo :P
@@thecoolnewsguy bruh man was jus trying to help a creator out. Iâm sure fireship probably cares
I like your sense of humour đthe way he's about to say terrifying but quickly switches to amazing
As a time traveler, can confirm
wow AI is improving so much. maybe in next 50 years, people from google will be able to use AI to stop all these spam on yt that literally copy a channel owner's name and add a random string next to it and write the same crypto crap msg million times.
@Deborah Hearne maybe they are just stupid
That "maybe" at the last hurts the mostđ„
Wow, that one in the middle is heavenly 1:05
In terms of the 18+ issue, I swear I remember reading that OpenAI removed all adult images from any training data to make sure it can't generate them (because it has no knowledge of things like that). It was either in the paper or the announcement article.
Yes, you're right.
"Preventing Harmful Generations
Weâve limited the ability for DALL·E 2 to generate violent, hate, or adult images. By removing the most explicit content from the training data, we minimized DALL·E 2âs exposure to these concepts. We also used advanced techniques to prevent photorealistic generations of real individualsâ faces, including those of public figures."
It can be reintroduced using fine-tuning on your own dataset.
@@eldendoge2302 Well, yeah, assuming they offer fine-tuning for DALL-E.
@@IceMetalPunk There is already an open source implementation of Dall-E one with fine-tuning. And the Dalle-2 research paper is currently being implemented. Glide had fine-tuning as well. Self supervised learning with Gen rep can also be used to bolster training with just the model weights. It is a possibility that in the next rendition of the paper they offer zero information about the architecture or changes from Dall-E 2 to prevent fine-tuning or implementations.
As exciting as developments like this are, the human race is nowhere near ready for something this powerful to be made publicly accessible. This tool could be manipulated into a dangerous misinformation machine, and there's plenty of appetite for alternative facts right now.
There are already some app free to make those picture, i used them to make bunch of art i post in instagram
Stable Diffusion seems to be running now...and it's awesome đđŒ
I'm loving the new frequent code reports
Recently I read an AI that can construct faces of a person from voices, i forgot the name of it, someone mention it if you know. It was in research phase.
Two Minute Papers
@@watchocho2660 yes but how's the fucking paper called
@@crispinotechgaming Go find the video, he always links the papers
@@crispinotechgaming google
@@justitgstuff5284 yea but how's the video called
DALL-E is the same as Copilot in the way that it gets the job done until a certain extend. In the end, nothing beats a real human with a ton of experience.
this is probably better than human
No, humans also process data thay have gathered through experience. Creativity is making best combination out of it. With a computer doing that, even picaso should be worried!
@@abhinavmishra9323 well said
Most people, even artists, don't create images that are half as good.
This isn't like Copilot though. This is about art, art doesn't have to be perfect. It just has to look appealing.
If you don't like an image that was generated, you tell it to generate another. Or just tell it to make a thousand images and pick the one you like.
" Maybe!!! ". the ending was priceless lol
Am I the only one who kept checking the upload date to see if it was uploaded April 1st and even though it kept saying April 7th was waiting for the "April fools" at the end???
Copilot is awesome except when itâs not..
I really hate the term AI for this technology.
They are not artificial intelligences, but rather "II" intelligent imitators.
But still very cool
Facts
That's a very interesting description of what humans are: intelligent imitators.
This depends how you define intelligence, I think that by any reasonable definition this is "real" intelligence, whatever that means
@@circuit10 Very well said.
And yes I do define it somewhat strictly. And the TLDR is, I don't think that general purpose AI will be ever build. Not that it will be impossible, but because it's not what we are trying to build.
But again you are right and this might just build down to definitions
An impostor per say, a sussy one
Well everyone out to the farming fields its time to pick crops and plow by hand. Ngl this sounds đ„ for greenhouse emissions
Don't worry, we still got Arnold to fight against the machines!
OpenAI banned the creation of explicit content btw. They didn't include training data for it and also applied many filters. They mentioned so in their blog on Dall-E.
They always publish the BEST-looking results!
Remember last time when they said âGPT-3 can write whole articleâ. Well that was true but the sentences didnât show a bigger context for the reader.
GPT-3 is just lorem ipsum on a new level. Wow đ
like a fine wine it gets better over time... for writing code it's already superior
It really isn't. I've used it. It's not absolutely crazy, but it is insanely good especially at using factual context and actually "knowing" things too.
Doesn't matter at all. The AI can generate thousands of images rapidly. It doesn't matter that some of them look bad, it doesn't even matter if most of them look bad. There is no loss to it.
I see that you've changed the miniature. Good job, this one is way better!
That Anne Curtis pic surprised me. Haha. Great vid
Great news for rule 34 at least... i guess
Man of culture đđ»
AI will never be able to replace software engineers who do more than just coding
but it will definetly replace programmers .
Yep! I recently got to the end of the Copilot waitlist, and my disappointment was immeasurable. After it being hyped up as my AI replacement, seeing it forget variables, dream up methods, or copy-paste incompatible code snippets temporarily cured my imposter syndrome.
Agi will, given the whole point of it is that it can do anything a human can do better
@@rkvkydqf Human brain is way to awesome for technology to imitate, yet
Never is a really long time frame. A future where you state the problem you want to solve and AI comes up with the optimal solution both in software and the underlying hardware, including a process to spit out the required hardware in virtually no time, isn't that far fetched. A human engineer would just get in the way.
I mean, that's pretty much the fundamental concern with AGI.
"I'll see you in the next one, *maybe!*"
This video was released exactly two years ago. Now we have DALL-E 3 and Midjourney and Stable Diffusion, we have Claude 3 Opus and a million open-source Llama derivatives. There are AI bfs and gfs, we can duplicate a speaking voice with a snippet of audio, etc etc. That's in two years. See you back here after an equally big leap in another two years...or more likely one year.
absolutely incredible art made by AI lol
This is why I believe that as a student, the future of my career is in hardware, not software.
At some point, with like 500 user stories given as input, some model like the transformer shown in the video will be able to build an entire mobile app, and will probably even be able to explain the entirety of the (optimized, mind you) process with perhaps something like backward chaining or whatever AI techniques we have these days.
I don't see the future of software developers to be as good as it is today, with all the no-code stuff we have and AI tools that can replicate human conceptual creation and reasoning, the only world in which AI is not taking over is the physical one, for now that is.
While the software world grows at a much faster pace than ever before, the world of hardware can barely follow.
The demand for computing power is huge and still growing, yet the supply is low (graphics cards and recent chip shortage are an example) and without much competitivity in the market since like 4 big companies produce hardware components at best, meanwhile the number of software-driven companies grows exponentially.
If AI can generate code for a website, can't it generate a schematic for a chip? Google was already using AI when designing its chips.
This is what I spend 6+ hours a day thinking about.
As a self taught programmer me seeing these tools gives me so much joy knowing how it can help me as a novice
But then I think about all the hard work I put into learning a new skill that is progressing become more available
Ultimately
I decided to focus more on Solididy and.................đ„đ„đ„
HARDWARE HARDWARE HARDWARE
@@rkvkydqf they can and do make new designs for chips, those designs still need Fabrication process, Q&A plus shipping and distribution
The hardware can use AI FOR NEW designs but CAN NOT complete the product life cycle.
Putting future growth more so in the hardware aspects of Computer Science
No matter how complicated stuff, there's no way AI can beat human stupidity. There is always some edge cases that AI cannot solve and sometimes those are critical ones. Therefore it will still need a human developer to guide in decision making.
@@rkvkydqf Yes, but there is more to a chip than just logic design. Obviously when it comes to logic optimization, AI will beat humans, there's always gonna be someone pulling out a hyper optimized algorithm for such applications.
But when it comes to physical implementations, I don't think so, or at least I am not aware of something like that.
This channel is incredible
This was a great summary!! I will using this in a future class.
I love how people think AI will replace programmers, it's very funny. Kind of like thinking the industrial revolution would replace mechanics and engineers.
Who creates AI? -> Yep.
In order for AI to replace programmers, it has to be able to create _better AI,_ from scratch (zero user input). And at that point, we've reached AGI, so it's not programmers that are obsolete, *it's all of humanity.*
Now low effort, low skill programming tasks? Yeah, those are constantly being made obsolete, with or without AI, but then that's true of all low effort, low skill work.
This A.I can already replace artists. If programmers will continue to be fcking dumb and invent better and better A.I, what makes you think the A.I won't be smart enough to take any kind of job? Honestly I don't get it, why are we inventing stuff that will take jobs of millions of people?
@@netanelaker4437 Most work in the world is done not because people enjoy doing it but because the work needs to get done. Saving people from having to endure shitty jobs is a great thing if the wealth generated by AI is actually shared by society as a whole. That being said, there's been almost no progress towards AGI recently. All the recent progress in AI has been in narrow domains. So we can automate away specific parts of jobs or even entire jobs if the job is simple and repetitive enough but entirely replacing human labor is many decades off at least.
@@netanelaker4437 you are so misinformed. AI will not take every job that exists on Earth. Programmers are not even responsible for regulating that. They are not "fcking dumb"
@@ooo8188
It's very simple:
Programmers creating tools that will make jobs like artists and musicians obesalete - malicious.
Programmers creating tools that will make other programmers and might make even them obesalete - dumb.
Like, why? Why would you do that? Who need an artist who spend their life honing their skill if I can just write some text and get the same result?
@@TheRyulord .
I have a very hard time imagining the wealth generated by A.I will get redistributed in a capitalist society.
to everyone who is worried that AI might take over their jobs, simply we all will switch to making AI as our new jobs, its like ur doing ur old job but faster and easier
Edit : the end is near
Sadly I'm not smart enough to make AI... And some people isn't neither. I think we will just starve with no job got.
troopers! we must protect this man at all costs
I played around with the currently existing image generation models but this is a whole new level. This makes human art completely obsolete and it's only 2022.
Glad I decided to leave traditional and digital art for coding. I mean, coders are gonna be replaced as well eventually, but I just simply know for a fact artists won't get any dime when an AI can create the same kind of work in a matter of seconds. People are already stingy a.f. when commissioning artists, it'll only get worse when they "can get an AI to make the same thing for free/cheaper and instantly" :(
I think the only way for coders to be replaced is by creating AIs that can code better than humans instead of copying code from the internet (which ironically a lot of developers do). The AI needs to have the ability to improve itself, becoming more and more close to humans in terms of learning, and at that point, the AI will be so powerful that will be the end not only for programmers, but for humanity in general
Agree,I was doing both art and coding till now but I think I'm gonna start focusing on coding now T-T
This comment makes me kinda sad. ):
when AI generates AI, I hope that future will be blessed and not terrible at all
in terms of using the ai for generating explicit images, they have made it so that you cannot do that unfortunately
by not only using automated and human filters, but also by limiting the explicit data
so not only you're not allowed to tell the ai to generate that, but the ai has no idea what that means
You can finetine the model on your own dataset to reintroduce types of images of your choosing.
@@eldendoge2302 the fact that you can doesnt mean you can
"unfortunately" lol
Eh, that still might not be a good enough fix. If I type "Omni-man meme but with children" you could still get explicit content generated since there's such a grey area.
Not to mention that people can insert images that could be explicit and just have the AI enhance that.
This so cool and yet scary at the same time.
Am Michael fron Rwanda tho bros I do enjoy watching your video keep up with the good work
I'm gonna be honest i hate this with a burning passion. Whilst yes it is freaking cool this could remove any ostentatious design, peoples jobs, and quite alot of creativity.
Lets take game development companies for example - they would no longer need artists if ai like this could provide 3d models (or if they go 2D), they most they'd need is animators and programmers - say somehow those are replaced too (programmers i'm doubtfull on - since you'd still need a team to make the code but github copilot does worry me) whats to say any person with access to this couldn't make a game solo - then what happens to the line between good and bad content if anyone can make anything.
Then you've got the other side aswell - still sticking with game dev - if this software is only available to companies who can afford it whats to say indie game devs aren't crushed by better tech than them - what's left of creativity is pumped out over the course of 1000 games by companies thus even possibly devaluing video games as a whole.
But that's not just applicable to game dev itself but the medium of art among possibly hundreds of other things - i mean if a computer can do a better job then you then is your art coined bad by everyone else?
I don't know i'm just spitballing here - haven't fully thought all this out but regardless - me no likey.
Interesting thoughts
AI is coming to every industry sooner or later. Unlike early hyperbolic reports of imminent AGI takeover it is going to take minimum 10 years for most industries to see some carve out effect. Economists reckon that pre-ai there is enough work in the World for 40% of people - this will drop to 30% or even 20%. We will have to find ways to adapt as government regulation of ai is not going to work.
@@michaelnurse9089 I'm imagining people (solo) will have to be working as hard as hell in their medium to provide better content than the ever evolving ai - and since this is hard given when the ai evolves their methods may have to aswell and of course as you said the lack of government regulations - I'm imagining 2 things might happen
1 people quit their job and have to change - leaving them to maybe even quit it as a hobby
or 2 people of the same medium form huge indie groups to make a single project - but i can only see this working for a few things
what's even more (unlikely i know but still) if the groups form large enough what's to say they don't just think heck if you can't beat em' join em' - which would be the worst since the group would split and be more likely to just fade away all together
The only real way i can think to stop it is to get people to pay towards anyone but the companies - but that's hard to do.
I miss when it was only this man
"i'll see you in the next one, maybe" đ€Łđ€Ł
The computer started firing everyone
-mike judge
A friend of mine would say that this is absolutely GEISTERKRANK!
Love how I will never use these cool stuff before they replace us because I existed wrong :/
much love yo
These are some great insights! I wonder how image generating AI's like Bluewillow would affect the art industry.
The flashbang at the beginning đ”âđ«
dall-e 1 was awesome can't wait for this one.
wow its insane how real some of those photos look specifically the shiba with the beret I could 100% see that being posted by some shiba instagram account
Give this man likes he deserves, people!
I see no reason to why technology couldn't replace any person. In a sense we're working to make ourselves obsolete, even in things as beautiful as art. We're working on killing the currently thriving art community, on purpose no less.
I know it's supposed to be exciting, but really I can't bring myself to be excited about it. I can't really express how much it saddens me, actually.
It's not exciting. It's cancerous. The world will be oversaturated with worthless computer generated art that took no effort to make, because everyone can now make it with the press of a button. May these automation monkeys rot in hell. There's no way I'm going to buy art in the future, because some monkey might try and and scam me with their pathetic ai generated art.
They are going to make so much money on this. Stock imagery is no longer needed.
this thing can solve all google captchas for sure
the release of dall-e 2 after gpt-3 proves that computers will rule us someday
Does a business using an AI-powered resume sorter qualify as machines ruling over you?
@@rkvkydqf not exactly, here I mean extraordinary rule, full power.
AI should only be used as a source of references to inspire your own art.
This could be an amazing tool for things like police sketches, as well as people with types of memory loss.
Great video! Super short and to the point as always! Keep making this great content:)
I recently got copilot and was surprised by what it could generate with a linked config file of 2 lines
art is about conveying emotions of the artists, i dont know if open ai can reach there. maybe but lets see
read an article on it yesterday and now you post a video about it damn
I like the "maybe" at the end xdd
This is huge. I'll dare to say it might burst the NFT bubble.
Disco Diffusion, Dall-E One, Pytti 5 are already being used to develop a significant portion of NFT artwork
I just saw it on Hacker News yesterday