Why the TECTOR STAR DESTROYER is my favorite Star Wars ship!

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 13. 03. 2020
  • 🔶 Charlie finds out his favourite Star Wars Empire at War ship, the Tector Star Destroyer! Watch to find out why!
    Star Wars Empire at War Fall of the Republic is a Star Wars Empire at War Clone Wars mod and is one of the Empire at War Expanded series. It is a mod from the creators of Thrawn's Revenge, takes a modern look at The Clone Wars series, with new factions, new ships and new types of gameplay. Along with a whole new take on the Skirmish Mode & Galactic Conquest. This is NOT a Thrawn's Revenge 2 and is it's own mod.
    -----
    🔸===== FEATURED =====🔸
    🔹 Editing by The Family Bovine | / thefamilybovine
    🔸===== ASSETS =====🔸
    🔹 Intro/Outro Music | Home - Resonance
    🔹 Outro meme'd by | / freightmytrain
    🔹 Music by DOMINANT | bit.ly/eckstoomusic
    =====Tags=====
    #StarWars #EmpireAtWar #HowTo
  • Hry

Komentáře • 48

  • @EcksToo
    @EcksToo  Před 4 lety +23

    Hey all, Charlie here. I know there has been a lot of solo-Charlie content lately. But rest-assured there will be more Eck content very, VERY soon!
    In the mean-time, my question to you all is, what is your new favourite ship from the update? You certainly know mine 😉
    - Charlie

    • @MrMustang1945
      @MrMustang1945 Před 4 lety

      DId you guys use some voice clips from Battlefront 2 (2006)? I swear I heard some nostalgia in there.

    • @ryankaiser2702
      @ryankaiser2702 Před 4 lety

      They have imported sound clips from Star Wars battlefront and Star Wars Galactic battlegrounds I am definitely hearing imperial / republic Boat noises
      If you don’t know what galactic battlegrounds is it’s basically age of empire except it’s Star Wars

  • @jam7923
    @jam7923 Před 4 lety +15

    I haven’t actually played with the Tector in fall of the republic, however I have in thrawns revenge, let’s just say the don’t work nearly as well there as they do here, the same goes with the praetor, I have played as the new republic and used two Mc 90’s and at most 5 support ships , and I have easily taken down a praetor, victory, and a acclamtor. So I’m pretty sure they praetor either needs a huge buff or the mc 90’s need a nerf. However if we are talking about tectors, I do think they are food ships they just really need quite a bit of fighter support.

    • @darman12able
      @darman12able Před 4 lety +2

      If I’m right I think they removed the longer firing distance the Praetor’s guns had in 2.1 which did hurt it a good bit from the bit of 2.2 I’ve played. That sort of artillery like role it had made fill a quite useful role in a fleet as instead of spamming smaller capital ships like the ISD you could throw a Praetor in and focus on a more varied and flexible support fleet to back it up.

    • @zbynekkowalski2202
      @zbynekkowalski2202 Před 4 lety +2

      There's actually no reason for buffing Praetor II. They were sort of upgraded Praetor I, which was build under Ruusan reformation limits, so it was tanky, but lacked a lot of firepower and speed

  • @Duchess_Van_Hoof
    @Duchess_Van_Hoof Před 4 lety +8

    I heard someone mention the Tector? A very underappreciated ship.

  • @evilcoleslaw
    @evilcoleslaw Před 4 lety +37

    Better pair them with some carriers though.

    • @EcksToo
      @EcksToo  Před 4 lety +9

      Definitely, with Acclamator being in Tech Level 1 now, I think that should not be too difficult!

    • @CTViewer07
      @CTViewer07 Před 4 lety +3

      Just take the page from the US Navy’s playbook 😉.

    • @ru6en800
      @ru6en800 Před 4 lety +4

      Tectors are good anti capital/space station but no fighter and low point defence is definitely a big weakness

    • @emperorflare8911
      @emperorflare8911 Před 4 lety +2

      Of course. A fleet is one strong unit, and ships shouldn’t be operating alone. Using effective combinations of Carriers to accompany the tectors would make them devastating.

  • @irampagingrhin0399
    @irampagingrhin0399 Před 4 lety +13

    Nice vid man.
    I am going to have to disagree with you, the tector for me is maybe 3rd favourite ship.
    I would have to put the Victory 1 as the best, in my opinion, gained at tech 3, huge damage output for its size and looks sleek.

    • @Duchess_Van_Hoof
      @Duchess_Van_Hoof Před 4 lety +2

      Ah, the Victor. Easily my favourite Star Destroyer. Far more practical than the ISD.

    • @Erolsaurus
      @Erolsaurus Před 3 lety

      What about the victory II, the poor man's equivalent to the Imperial?

  • @guardsmenmrdew4286
    @guardsmenmrdew4286 Před 4 lety +4

    I got six of them in 6 weeks in game once i was cheering mate : )
    Great video keep it up mate : D

    • @EcksToo
      @EcksToo  Před 4 lety +1

      Thanks for the kind words!
      - Charlie

  • @sayerglasgow115
    @sayerglasgow115 Před 4 lety +9

    Venator's design: Primary focus is fighters, but can also serve as a battleship, and carries large amounts of ground forces, complete multirole ship.
    ISD's design: Large focus on maximizing firepower to serve as a battleship, still carries some fighters, as well as lots of ground forces.
    Tector's desing: MoRe GuN
    Which is a pretty dammed good design philosophy. Battle carriers are bad enough, but what bright spark in the star wars universe decided it was a good idea to jam every battleship with a ground invasion force as standard equipment?

    • @stablernose7203
      @stablernose7203 Před 4 lety +1

      Well the empire wanted to occupy most planets and having a rickety 30 year old acclamator deliver the troops defeats their fear doctrine

    • @sayerglasgow115
      @sayerglasgow115 Před 4 lety +1

      @@stablernose7203 Then make a big troop transport that's black and covered in skulls, I don't care. I mean, I can ALMOST see it making sense with the empire, since their ships were acting more as platforms for the occupation of planets than as ships fighting a real war, and there weren't really any ships that could challenge an ISD in a straight up fight. But they should have ditched the ground forces when they had any expectation that they might be going into battle with a decently armed foe.
      And the Republic really has no excuse. There is no reason that those venators needed to be packed with ground troops and armored vehicles while engaging enemy ships.
      Just imagine how much more effective these ships would be if they swapped out all the tanks and landing barges in their hangers for more fighters.

    • @Nidhoggrr
      @Nidhoggrr Před 4 lety

      @@stablernose7203 It had nothing to do with the age of the ships and everything to do with the Emperor not wanting ANYTHING to remind people of the Republic when they thought of the Empire.
      To that end every single thing that did was disposed of as fast as possible even though all of it could have been used for decades to come. He throws away and replaces an entire military in just a couple years in order to achieve this.

    • @emperorflare8911
      @emperorflare8911 Před 4 lety

      I agree. Destroyers are not meant to be equipped with such equipment. In a combination with carriers, a tector would be an amazing asset.

    • @Erolsaurus
      @Erolsaurus Před 3 lety +1

      For instance, how am I gonna stop a big mean mother Hubbard from tearing me a structurally superfluous new behind?
      The answer is it's a gun, and if that don't work, use more gun

  • @keatonburton6064
    @keatonburton6064 Před 4 lety +4

    Was that Justin's voice saying, "We'll deploy those mines." when you pressed the button to deploy the interdictor mines?

    • @EcksToo
      @EcksToo  Před 4 lety +2

      Yeah that's mine

    • @keatonburton6064
      @keatonburton6064 Před 4 lety +1

      @@EcksToo I thought that was your voice on the Pelta support ship. Very cool.

  • @pierceplaysstudios245
    @pierceplaysstudios245 Před 4 lety +3

    i love your vids so much also eaw is so cool

    • @EcksToo
      @EcksToo  Před 4 lety +1

      Thank you pal, means a lot!
      - Charlie

  • @pogwog5309
    @pogwog5309 Před 4 lety +5

    tector is better than eck's puny nebula

  • @kylelantan9220
    @kylelantan9220 Před 4 lety

    I didn't look into the exact patch notes on the Acclamator 1's but the carrier lost significant firepower, which is fair in my opinion. Before the only difference between the assault and the 2 was fighter composition and missiles. The carrier used to have 4 quad turbolasers, which had it been left like that for a tech 1 ship would have been overpowering.

  • @P3ndragon-232
    @P3ndragon-232 Před 4 lety +1

    Venator

  • @Lordinventar
    @Lordinventar Před 4 lety

    after rebalance yes
    gunships seem to be better than carrier now, and tector is a pure gunship with high dps and shield
    send a carrier lucrehulk vs a bb lucrehulk and you see what i mean
    acclamator are still good i would say
    i use assault acclamator because of beeing a jack of all trades

  • @Nidhoggrr
    @Nidhoggrr Před 4 lety

    I do think ships should get more engine hard points based of how big or how many they have.

  • @LiliaArmoury
    @LiliaArmoury Před 4 lety

    does fall of the republic have a galactic conquest mode?

  • @xaviorpeters5972
    @xaviorpeters5972 Před 4 lety

    Hey Eck. Just so you know you have to activate those mines manually

  • @ceilyurie856
    @ceilyurie856 Před 4 lety

    Were those early model TIEs? Huh.

  • @crimson1427
    @crimson1427 Před 4 lety +2

    I have a Galactic Vs idea The Flood Vs The Emporium Of Man

  • @ryankaiser2702
    @ryankaiser2702 Před 4 lety

    Isn’t a tector class star destroyer just a star destroyer optimized for ship to ship combat with no hanger bays

  • @ru6en800
    @ru6en800 Před 4 lety

    Despite a tector easily being able to beat venetor I won't say a tector is better. The tector doesn't have fighters and - being a isd variant - don't have any major anti fighter defence wear as the venetor is a muti purpos/carrier/support vessel

    • @emperorflare8911
      @emperorflare8911 Před 4 lety +1

      ru6en Which is exactly the point. The venators and secutor are better as carriers than warships. The Tector is a pure destroyer; accompanied by Venators and secutor, the ship would be extremely effective at offensive operations.
      No ship should ever move without escort. The fact that each ship is specialized makes a fleet much more versatile and offers more tactical options. The Tector doesn’t need any kind of fighter support, because there’s already ships to do that for him, and it brings firepower Venators/Secutors/Victory’s could never bring. It only became useless in the imperial era, because the empire didn’t make much use of carriers.

  • @avgjoegaming8271
    @avgjoegaming8271 Před 4 lety

    Dont like changing stuff just to slow down games. Balance sure but doubling high end ships making you almost not buy them seems weird. You saved up money for 5 minutes and couldn't even get a praetor

    • @EcksToo
      @EcksToo  Před 4 lety +1

      I do not mind the changes on first impression. It will be exciting to use these new changes with potential new maps that allows to source large amounts of income safely.
      - Charlie

  • @overphoenix2394
    @overphoenix2394 Před 4 lety +1

    Traitor