Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Nuclear War Simulator ~ WARNING ~ Very Confronting!
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 02. 2023
- WARNING: The theme and subject matter of this video is very confronting.
Nuclear War Simulator is a very real simulation of what could happen if nuclear war broke out. It is not a game but covers very important subject matter.
If you enjoy the content, Subscribing and liking the video will help me a lot to promote the video on CZcams. Clicking the notification bell (next to 'Subscribe') should mean you don't miss out on any of the videos.
Please support the channel on Patreon: / dastactic
Buy me a coffee: ko-fi.com/dast...
DasTactic Nexus Games Store: nexus.gg/dasta...
Merch: shop.dastactic...
My EXTRA Channel: / dastacticextra
Discord: / discord
Regular Livestreams on Twitch: / dastactic
#DasTactic #NuclearWarSimulator
I have no confidence the people in charge will stop this from happening.
they have managed to keep it under control for almost a century, why would they act differently now?
@@User-jr7vf it's playing russian roulette, sorry about the pun. Sooner of later the bullet is going to go off. We have had many numerous close calls and not the situation is at it's worst. I am 67, this is the worst it has ever been.
@@valhala56 I see. I'm 27 and this is the first time in my life that I witness the world facing such a possibility.
I'm 70 and this time I see it coming. It's not a joke.
@@User-jr7vf : They absolutely will NOT stop this from happening considering that a nuclear exchange covers up 1) Economic collapse (USD collapsing under multidozen trillions in debt) 2) Depopulation (WEF & Georgia Guidestones agenda) 3) Excess mortality "Died Suddenly" IF the US/EU/NATO manages to win that exchange they take apart Russia like a chicken and then use all those stolen resources to "build back better"
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play
That is the reality of also it IRL.
As true now as it was then.
Unless you could erase russia without them retaliating, that would be a win.
@@-Markus- If one nation had that power, would the others sit and wait and hope it wasn't used on them? More likely they would they pre-emptively strike, just in case.
@@-Markus- "erasing" 140 million Russian citizens is genocide, not a win.
I misread the title as "Very Comforting" and was, needless to say, very confused for a moment
Don't matter how raw it is, every single person needs to know about this type of simulation. And the reality of nuclear war.
Greetings professor Falken, would you like to play a game?
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
The reality is horrible, the simulation is hilarious. "Can you have Russia nuke your neighbours barking dog without being impacted yourself" - this game finally allows me to find the answers to the questions I seek!
Here's hoping enough soldiers continue to have a level enough head to do what needs to be done to prevent this IRL.
I think this simulation is so focused on the worst possible out come that the designers forgot to ask the questions how would people on the ground respond and would a nation chose to use a surface burst if they did not have to. to quote nuke map "A surface burst means the nuclear weapon is detonated on or very near the ground. An airburst means that the weapon is detonated high enough that its fireball does not touch the ground. They have somewhat different acute effects, and very different radiological effects (e.g. fallout is primarily from surface bursts)." also gave me this message "Modeling casualties from a nuclear attack is difficult. These numbers should be seen as evocative, not definitive. Fallout effects are deliberately ignored, because they can depend on what actions people take after the detonation. For more information about the model" though the link is dead"
and honestly I am more scared of chemical weapons since you cant see them, they kill in less than 120 seconds with a drop, and they will persist for months. did you know gulf war syndrome it was caused by chemical weapons made air born from detonated ammo storage.
the majority of my source is hypothetical history's videos on both types of weapons. and i think every one should watch both the most neutral and informative on either subject
Here is the Savior
YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
I think this sim is the modern equivalent of death traps
this is a quote from the authors site about him self
"My background
My name is Ivan Stepanov, I am a simulation engineer and the developer of The Nuclear War Simulator. I was born in the city of Semipalatinsk, Kazakhstan which is known for the fact that the Soviet Union was testing most of its nuclear weapons on a test site just 150 km away. Everybody in my family has experienced atmospheric or underground nuclear weapons tests. One of my family members was constructing the tunnels for underground testing for several years and another one was evacuated during one of the early atmospheric tests. I have no formal education in the area of nuclear weapons, however, I was collecting and reading resources on this topic since I was a child. I was collecting books, and newspaper articles about the victims of the test site, and spent a lot of time in the library which had a whole section dedicated to the nuclear weapons test site.
I now live in Germany, I did a Ph.D. in experimental physics at the RWTH Aachen University working with lasers, semiconductors, and high-frequency electronics. At the moment I am working as a simulation engineer modeling laser sensors and generating synthetic sensor data for self-driving cars’ AI. In my free time, I am working on this project."
"and honestly I am more scared of chemical weapons since you cant see them, they kill in less than 120 seconds with a drop, and they will persist for months."
The area of effect for chemical weapons is _neglibible_ compared to the fallout area of a nuclear war.
Defcon is very good. And is a game and also points out nobody wins. But its just a game.
Needs a wargames mode where the graphics look like the movie
I have fond memories of playing Introversion's "Defcon", but it spooked me out playing it.
This is too much for me though, as a kid that grew up in the 1980s, the spectre of nuclear war was a constant nagging terror, and I'm not sure I really fancy living through that again.
@@MaJetiGizzle nah, nukes are old tech now, nobody can use them for fear of the new stuff. Also Frank Zappa's quote still applies
@@MaJetiGizzle true it's still there and it looks to be heating up. The technology is getting more and more accessible.
Guys, Here is the Savior
YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified/Pierced for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF”
From the Ancient Egyptian Semitic:
"Yad He Vav He" is what Moshe (Moses) wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3)
Ancient Egyptian Semitic Direct Translation
Yad - "Behold The Hand"
He - "Behold the Breath"
Vav - "Behold The NAIL"
Welcome back to possible nuclear war
The reason why there is little ot no fallout in some cases is that those explosions may be air bursts which don't cause significant fallout. I wonder how did they came to the amount of soot. Modern buildings contain flammable materials but the very structures forming majority of the mass are made out of concrete and bricks and these don't burn.
But people do
Yes we love the heat. Fire it up, fire it up, fire it up.
💯☢️
they should change the profile pictures to match their injuries haha
A haunting simulation to be sure, yet all its intricate calculations still cannot depict the true extent of the suffering such a disaster would entail. Power and clean water would be cut not just to the affected areas but entire nations. Public order would collapse, as would most people's food supply. Even those unaffected by the direct effects of the blast and the radiation would struggle to survive in a bleak new world where everyone has to fend for themselves with zero support. No medical care, either: You step on a rusty nail, contract a bad cold, or get an infected tooth? A slow, agonizing death awaits. And if you're not growing your own crops or keeping livestock, prepare to starve or fight your neighbors over dwindling scraps. Whatever lifespan you have left will be spent constantly thirsty, hungry, and sick of dysentery or other diseases. The true extent of the damage to most of humanity would only become evident after months and years. If your side is flirting with the idea of starting a nuclear war then you need to start asking yourselves if you're really the good guys. Stop the madness.
The moment you consider using the damn things...you deserve to lose.
Why would clean water stop flowing in far away countries? same goes for food suply, medical assistance and electricity. The only thing far away countries would have to deal with, is those countries that are dependent on exports from affected nations, would suffer. Also, the global economy would suffer. And thirdly, countries that are far away may face a flood of "nuclear refugees".
@@User-jr7vf Here's the thing, the economy is global. *Everyone* to some degree is reliant. Especially the Global South. Most places cannot feed themselves on their own food production, because a global economy allows the best areas to be used for food and allowing other areas do what they're good at.
That is why Russia can't be allowed to simply "get away" with this. It has threatened the world's stability, and its food supply, all for a vainglorious war of conquest that it *clearly isn't even good at.*
@@RaptorJesus Russia, USA, Ukraine, NATO, et cetera.
Still only putin(g) the blame on Russia? To choose the comforting lies over the unpleasant truths... Wowie.
@@jocundus4088 If Russia didn't act in ways that made their neighbours all want to join NATO, all their neighbours wouldn't join NATO. This is a problem solely of their own design, the consequences of their own actions.
It's the 2020s, not the 1820s. You don't get to say "sphere of influence" and that magically justify a war off imperial conquest anymore.
I remember this one nuclear war simulator game game called "defcon" you can literally battle people online.
This is really terrifying. It's one thing to read about the devastation of nuclear war, quite another thing to see it visually in this manner. To think that this is the best the human race can do to keep some peace... risking such catatrophic destruction. It's disturbing to contemplate what our odds are.
15:00-15:35 that makes you human Das not a wuss, but human. This is a sad reminder of the world we live it and what could happen if things keep going downhill. Life is too short as is. Love while you can and be kind to each other is what I get from this
"Confronting". Some of us grew up under this threat.
we're still under this threat to this day. obviously nuclear arsenals are smaller now but all out nuclear war could kill millions anyway
Cheers, mate, great simulation! I think I'll buy it.
Thanks for the warning and everything, but we could all tell you were pretending and were really just playing Dwarf Fortress the whole time. Strike the earth!
at least we stopped global warming
in terra invicta there is the feature that a nuclear power once attacked will retaliate with nuclear forces. it seems we forgot about it since the 90s.i remember the nuclear angst in germany in the 70s and 80s. so i dont need a simulation about this.
This is more likely now than it was in the Cold War era. We are concerned about plastic bags and gender norms, but the probability of a nuclear war has never been greater than now.
"would you like to play a game?"
Let's better play a game of chess
Where’s China - you missed like one of the biggest nuclear bomb makers.
Where do you get it
I'm curious what would happen over time in more remote places like the hawaiian islands or madagascar. Nuclear winter is spooky.
That part of the simulator is still under construction but coming. And the Hawaiian islands are not remote at all. In almost every scenario Oahu and other islands take an absolute pounding (Naval fleet HQ, Schofield barracks, Kanehoe Bay and other installations)
@@brandonbowerstx idk why i said hawaii lol but i guess i was thinking tropical. Like, what would happen to the amazon?
How do you buy the simulator?
9:36
Simulation starts @4:52
GREETINGS PROFESSOR FALKEN
it looks like a damn game
Why does Germany get attacked so much in the European scenario? Are any nuclear weapons stationed there?
They have a few dozen American-made nuclear aviation bombs that can be released for use at US discretion.
@@crowe6961 thank you
As part of the NATO alliance of course. There used to be a lot more during cold war. When i served i was stationed next to an old abandoned nuclear weapons storage facility. Today they do rave events there.
They're integral to NATO, both from a positioning perspective and from a military-industrial perspective. They also used to be the frontline between NATO and the Warsaw Pact.
Do you just like to hear yourself
The war that stops wars is what this simulates. I don't know a country who probably wouldn't use these if they were loosing. I'd personally would throw everything and the kitchen sink.
The war that stops wars is a new sentence to me, and I like that. It describes well what a nuclear war is.
I’m terrified 😴
Dont ,its goes fast lol 🤩☢️
11:00 i think this is how to look at it.
I dont think the game is trying to be offensive, it's merely showing the harsh reality of just how dangerous this sick game that Russia is playing could be, and how easily it could all spiral out of control during a single day, before we've even seen the news on TV, ICBM's could be flying in the air.
Sometimes you have to face the horrors of what could happen, to make everything to ensure it doesnt happen.
In the sense that, if we dont KNOW how bad it can get, we wont avoid it.
Now, what can we do as civilians? Almost nothing.
And certainly not enough time to have a grass roots anti-nuclear movement that would affect Putin in any way.
But if we get out of this, perhaps, at least we'll gradually morph geopolitics into a non-nuclear future.
(not energy tho, we need nuclear power more than ever)
And just food for thought, if anyone thinks tactical nukes arent as bad.
What USA dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki are the same sizes we now classify as "small tactical nukes".
Hardly small by any sane definition.
Stop listening to that mind poison.. i.e. Mainstream media
only if Ukraine is stupid enough to launch an attack into Russia proper and threaten the existence of the state. Russia has been quite clear on the nuclear use protocols. They existed before this war and have not changed because of this war.
==
"According to a Russian military doctrine stated in 2010, nuclear weapons could be used by Russia "in response to the use of nuclear and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies, and also in case of aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the very existence of the state is threatened".[41][42][43] Most military analysts believe that, in this case, Russia would pursue an 'escalate to de-escalate' strategy, initiating limited nuclear exchange to bring adversaries to the negotiating table. Russia will also threaten nuclear conflict to discourage initial escalation of any major conventional conflict.[44]"
yeah must be russia.. what level of propaganda have you been watching where you think its just "russia BAD", if you paid even just a little attention you would know its nato that is the side pushing us closer to a nuclear exchange.. its the west that has decided we need to go to economic war and now close to literal war to prop up one of the most corrupt and repressive governments in the world
Placing the entirety of blame on solely Russia is bold.
@@pacer2310 but... it is? This entire situation wouldn't even exist had Russia not broken the treaty it made with Ukraine and invaded them back in 2014.
@@danielm.595 and exactly who sponsored a coup in Ukraine in 2014..? that would be the USA.. which sparked a civil war of sorts. the USA's finger prints are all on that.
Ukraine also broke or never had any intention of following the Minsk 2 agreement in 2015. Angela merkle even admitted that Minsk 2 was used to stall for time in order to arm/train Ukraine's military . I believe she said this in nov or dec of 2022.. Germany and France was the witnesses to the agreement. Russia entered the agreement in Good faith. Ukraine & Germany did not. Russia will not trust the western governments again and rightfully so, especially since the April 2022 negotiations in turkey was also used to stall for time by Ukraine and /or was nixed by Boris Johnson at the behest of the USA. That deal was a good deal too. Ukraine should of took the Minsk 2 or the turkey deal in 2022. Both where very reasonable and was far better than the USA would of offered if the rolls where reversed
I think you need to do further research on the causes of the war.
Where can we find this program?
Steam
Steam and Matrix/Slitherine
Wow you people are still afraid of Japan that much.
Who is afraid of Japan?
Need to get to the point and heart of the matter, less jabber jabber over nothing.
I highly recommend this for the whole "you can survive a nuclear war, its not so bad" crowd.
Yeah, not for me either. I think those faces will be AI generated.
This thing was marketed very poorly with wish-washy language that implied it was a game of some sort. It is not. It's a pretty half-assed attempt at a better Nukemap (free) that costs 30 dollars. It's also horrifically bug ridden. They are probably, if I had to trust my gut, getting every 3rd or 4th copy sold refunded. Slitherine and the dev seem to be hoping institutions will want it, but in the time being they are making a couple of dollarydoos off kids on Steam who see the word "game" multiple times in the description and eagerly bought it only to find out that it's about as entertaining as accounting software and prone to breaking and giving garbage results.
This game is for nuclear weapons what DCS is for combat aircraft. The difference is that this is a wind up toy that you set in motion, like an all AI video game
Sont the russian said they have automation called dead hand?!?!? I mean he said it loud and clear they dont need to push the button all it has to hapend is on icbm falls in russian city or military base un federation to start so!?? Wtf
"Fail Deadly" is the term.
@@brandonbowerstx Yes, but that's a term for everything you design specifically to go off when it fails. In this case, the Soviet/Russian automation itself is called "Dead Hand". It reminds me a lot of the "Doomsday Device" from Dr. Strangelove.