WICKED MOVIE TRAILER Reaction and Breakdown
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 06. 2024
- Dorothy, is that you...? The Wicked movie trailer is finally out for the joy (and despair) of the theatre community. But which is it for me? hehehe Hit that play button to find out!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
❤ PATREON especially for you: / barbara2_0
📷 Instagram: @thatbarbara2.0
/ thatbarbara2.0
🐤Twitter: @that_barbara
/ that_barbara
------------------------------------------------------------------------
👀 UPCOMING REACTIONS - add your favourite shows: / barbara20is. .
***Copyright Disclaimer: none of the songs in this video belongs to me. This is a non-commercial video for entertainment purposes only.
#wicked #movie #reaction - Hudba
What I heard from a reaction on another channel is that this first trailer is showing footage from both movies just to hype us up for the whole franchise, then as time goes on and we get closer to release time, we'll get more Part 1-specific trailers. That's why you see Dorothy and all the things that happen in act 2 in this trailer
same i heard that too 😂 must be talking about the same one i saw lol
@@Isaiah-io4ud I've honestly seen so many at this point I don't even remember which one it was
That makes sense. As a fan of surprises, I wish they hadn't done that though hahahaha
Yes because it doesn’t indicate that this is part 1
this is a teaser for wicked overall. so that’s why you see scenes from both parts in this teaser. as we get closer to part 1, we will get a trailer for part 1
I understand where you're coming from with the visuals not being different, but I also think that Oz itself has a very distinct aesthetic that hasn't changed much since the 1939 movie. Plus the fact that they do also want to market to a more general audience that hasn't seen or heard the musical, without other context the visuals are a good way of conveying that it takes place in the world of Oz
But that's precisely why I was hoping they would be a bit more out of the box with it. It's a whole new generation, it's an adaptation of a musical that already dared to look at the story from a different perspective, why not hold on to that? If you ask me, there was no better time to reinvent the "Oz aesthetic" than with this movie
@@Barbara2.0 They already changed Oz from being Art Deco to Art Nouveau tho, like that's *very* different. Less decadent opulence and more fairy tale heavenly city
The reason a lot is confusing is your going off the musical and all though this is taking the songs from it the plot is from the book
Dorothy s timeline is a part from when Alphaba and Glinda become established adult witches in their separate regions, remember in Act 2 when Elphaba and Glinda fight each other after Fiyero choses to be with Elphaba and Morrible sends the tornado to kill Nessa Rose (Dorothy's house)
I feel like end of movie 1 ends with defying gravity and post credits scene is black and white camera rising showing Dorothy holding Toto from behind and a tornado in the distance
My prediction is that Part 1 will have Elphaba flying into the camera, Ala Harry Potter in the Prisoner of Azkaban, after that scene of flying up the tower.
You’re the first person I see having a positive view on the new riff, that’s hella refreshing
Big fan of fresh choices and reinvention
I'm confused about what the fuss is about tbh. I feel like people upset about the changed riff have only listened to the original broadway recording cos every Elphie has her own spin on that final phrase.
I agree! I think the shot of galinda’s wedding is from Im not that girl. I actually think the shot of fiyero is from the lion cub scene cause it looks like Elphie’s hand in what may be her Shiz uniform’s shirt. Either that or a new scene added to the first film to pad the time a little for a full feature based on act 1.
It's based on Wicked the book and musical. So it'll be darker in part two and possibly one, since the book is pretty dark ~
I love that they finally made Dorathy’s shoes finally the right color.
MGM owns the copyright on the ruby slippers so I don't think they even could do that if they wanted to
Regarding the shot at 3:35, I have three different theories as to what it could be; either, as you said, a moment during "not that girl", or a potential graduation ceremony that could be very briefly shown at the very end of the movie (assuming it ends right after "Defying Gravity", this could be part of a montage to prime us for where we'll pick up in part two) OR, and I would love this, it could be a call-back to the novel where there was a scene in which Madame Morrible gives Glinda and Elphaba magic visions of what they could achieve if they were to join the wizard and his regime. The scene is written from Glinda's pov and it shows her being married to a handsome, obscenly rich guy. Depending of how much book-only-content they wanna include in the movie, this could fit this moment quite well, too.
Edit: Or, as someone else in the comment section rightly pointed out, they simply did include scenes from Part 2 in this trailer already to spike our interest. Still. I'd love for a few more book-inclusions. ^^
Really enjoyed your commentary and energy! I was wondering if you ever considered watching the trailer for the first time without pausing, so it's a reaction. Then going through it and breaking it down after. When searching for reactions to something and finding a channel for the first time, pausing on the first watch turns away a lot of viewers. Regardless, really like your vibe:)
Thanks for the feedback and kind words, appreciate it! 🙂
The trailer is not just of part one or two, it’s a combination of both movies. So no need to be confused on the time line until it comes out.
We’re seeing a big mix from the musical, book, and the mgm wizard of oz movie
I THINK this is shots from BOTH movies. Because the title just says Wicked. No part 1 that i can see anywhere
perhaps the dorothy scene is from the start? like showing them going home and then the rest of oz celebrating elphaba’s death - then flashing back to show what happened before?
I am hearing that since both part 1 and 2 are filming back to back the trailer is showing moments from both movies.
The most shocking thing to me was that there was zero tension between Elphaba and Galinda. I think bc it was for the Super Bowl this was just the “big tent” trailer to get ppl hype about a “new” Wizard of Oz, the actors, and show off the cinematography.
Maybe it was because they're only seen together for all of 5 seconds in the trailer?
the trailer is showing both act 1 and act 2 mixed up
Hey girl, looks like I might be the first to comment. We'll see. Anyway, I think you might have forgotten about wickedness must be punished. When the wizard sent out the witch hunters.
But that didn't include Dorothy, right? 😅
@@Barbara2.0 technically she'd have been off screen 🤣
I totally agree about the aesthetic. It feels too Wizard of Oz instead of Wicked. Wizard of Oz is about an outsider coming to Oz and seeing it for the first time; its magical, whimsical, optimistic, imaginative, it's somewhere over the rainbow. Wicked is about people who are FROM Oz, who see past the emerald facade to what it really is. It's gritty, dark, politically corrupt. I enjoyed seeing the poppy fields but I hope the actual movie doesn't lighten the themes too much
This is such a great point!
Its a first look into both films!
this is a trailer for Wicked the whole musical, not just part one
as i understand it the trailer has footage from part i and ii so maybe that’s why the timeline seems confusing
Yes it’s gotta be both Act 1 and Act 2
If you haven’t heard it you should listen to Epic the musical it’s unfinished, but absolutely amazing
I have some hope for the film since Jon Chu (director of In the Heights 2021 film) is directing this adaptation and Cynthia Erivo (Elphaba) is a powerhouse! Check out her performance of The Color Purple 2016 revival from the Tony ceremony which earned her a Tony.
My only big gripe is why are the making this into a two-part film? If they are adding stuff in the novel, I would understand, but there is not much reason to market the film as such. Always love hearing your thoughts, Barbara :)
Yeah people seem very polarised about it being two parts, and although I do believe it's partially for the money, I kinda like the idea of having more time to explore the meaning ful themes and relationships in the story, if they're seeing this as an opportunity to do so, that is
Ok, Now that I have seen the trailer a Million and One times, gone frame by frame and over analyzed it, I believe this teaser has parts of both films. I think the frame with Elphie & Fiyero is from the scene where they rescue the Lion cub. The Wedding Scene could possibly be Glinda's I'm Not that Girl (Reprise) where Elphie crashes the Wedding and Fiyero leaves her at the alter but it could also be in Glinda's Imagination in Popular where she tells Elphie that she and Fiyero are getting married. Now Dorothy. Right After Elphaba and Fiyero sing As Long as you're Mine, That's when the Story of The Wizard of Oz starts to Overlap with Wicked. During No Good Deed, Elphaba turns Fiyero into The Scarecrow. Hope I could provide some context.
What I really want to know is what they're going to be adding from the books. It's been over a decade since I last read it, but from what i remember that could go absolutely anywhere from silly little details to deeply scarring even if we just stick to what happens in the period Act One takes place in. I mean, arguably particularly then considering That One Thing. 😂
Yeah I've heard the book is pretty wild but, to be honest? Looking at this trailer I wouldn't keep my hopes up for a lot of book content, it doesn't look like the audience they're trying to reach
If you haven't heard it already you should really listen to "The Color Purple" broadway cast recording. Cynthia Erivo - Elphaba - plays the lead, Celie, so you can get a grasp on her (incredible) voice, and overall it's just an amazing musical. You should also watch her perform "I'm Here" live, 'cause it is amazing.
I don't thinking they will mix both acts, I believe that this first look is just like the first "Deathly Hallows" trailer. It was announced that it would be 2 parts but the first trailer showed footage of both movies. Later they had trailers for each part. Here is the same. Dorot3and the gang will appear only in the 2 movie. But I suspect that the hat shot in the beginning of trailer and Glinda in the bubble shot is probably the the beginning of the first movie, while there's the overture. And then the flowers field with people running will be they singing "good news! She's dead!".
you are funny😂.....they showed scenes from part 1 AND 2😉
I don’t understand the confusion. Dorothy goes to see the Wizard and he tells her to kill the wicked witch and she does, bringing back her broomstick. That’s the story of the Wizard of Oz and the framework for the second Act of Wicked.
I may be wrong but in the show Elphaba locks Dorothy up before she has a chance to meet the wizard, right? Or does that happen after Dorothy has been sent by the wizard? But then, why would the scarecrow (aka Fyiero) be there? Sorry if I'm getting my facts wrong, it's been a while since I saw the show and even longer since I watched Wizard of Oz
No it happens after Dorothy meets up with the wizard. In the show, we never actually see this meeting (this must be a new scene added for the movie). Everything happens exactly as it does in The Wizard of Oz (broadly at least). Fiyero is turned into the scarecrow before Dorothy arrives and they meet as they did in Wizard of Oz. The implication (I think?) is that Scarecrow (Fiyero) doesn't follow Dorothy to go see the Wizard in search of a brain but secretly to find Elphaba.
Ok that makes more sense. I haven't seen The Wizard of Oz since I was a child so didn't remember much. Thank you!
People need to calm the f*** down about that riff lol. Every single singer I've ever heard performed defying gravity, unless they are a pedantic purist, does their own thing with the role and the riff. Not you too😢 ( for clarity I'm not outright attacking you or anything. I love that you have an opinion and aren't afraid to say it. I just don't agree with every one of them when I first saw the trailer I was turned off too because of just general things. But the riff didn't annoy me. At all.)
yea i just feel like people need to accept that this is not the broadway show
Indeed, I have seen 7 different Elphabas on Broadway and there were really only two of them that did the riff "as written" as it were. Idina Menzel and Ana Gasteyer. Everyone else did things differently with the most different coming from Eden Espinosa and Shoshana Bean. Cynthia Erivo is an astonishing artist and I have all confidence that all will grow to love this riff like we have celebrated the different riffs of all the others.
@@garylife5320 Erivo's voice in the trailer does nothing at all for me. But that doesn't mean she won't be great in general. Just that she may not be for me personally when the time comes.
Now Shoshanna? Yesssssssss hehehe
Oh the riff doesn't annoy me at all. I have full confidence in Cynthia's skills. I was just surprised they were brave enough to change it because from what I've heard, Wicked, as a musical, is historically known for being quite rigid with some of the performance elements, and that's a big moment
@@leadingblind1629 it's a trailer, she's been phenomenal in every show she's been in.
Pleaseeeeee react to epic the musical 🩵💫🩵
The movie will make, I def fate, will never dies 😊
Ahhhh they had the chance to make Fiyero native as he was in the books and give him his Tattoos back and they didnt do it😢😢
Rewrite the riff - within a pitch key that makes sense - is it ok to say it feels off? It almost feels like a person falling from a great height rather than a person claiming their identity and purpose.
I heard they are gender swapping, Dr. dilliamond, but theres also rumors it could be idina or kirsten playing him
Erivo is wrong for the part, period.
This trailer makes me incredibly skeptical of how much I will like this movie. If I don't find the 1st movie up to my expectations since it's one of my favorite musicals, I won't see the 2nd. The ending riff of DG is terrible. I know every witch does it their own way on stage, but I feel like this version doesn't work for me. Even though I love Cynthia, she's too old to play Elphaba. I say this knowing that older actors play the characters on stage, but for screen it's more obvious they aren't 19 yrs old in act 1. I'm doubtful Ariana can pull off the emotion and strength needed for Thank Goodness, and I personally don't find her that great of an actress compared to Cynthia. I'm too in love with the details of the musical and the book series to accept some of the changes we can see. That's my problem I know. Unless they're using the combination of every version of the story created, including the book which is way more adult and dark, not to mention adding more songs, I don't see how it will work as 2 whole movies. I haven't been happy with the musicals turned movie musicals that have come out in the last few years. I guess we'll see how the other trailers make me feel. I know I'm in the minority with this opinion. I'll try to be more flexible in my expectations and criticism, but like so many others, I have been waiting for this movie for a billion years and I dont want to be disappointed.
Great. Easier to get a parking spot at the theater........... Basing a complete judgement on a small trailer is so logical. Again, do not take the chance to be disappointed. Some people give the "vibe" that disappointment is somehow deadly...... or something. Only go for the "sure thing". And you comment gives the impression that you know a "sure thing"....... or not.
@@donny1960 Finding parking at a movie theater is never hard. Everyone makes judgments, just like you made a judgment about me. That's how life works. You have an opinion and I have mine.
@@Emilaria I knew that before I posted. But thanks for the reminder. Giving me semi-permission to express an opinion is mighty good of you. Also, finding parking at a movie theater is sometimes hard. And that is NOT an opinion. It is a fact.
@@donny1960 I'm not giving you semi-permission to express your opinion. You don't need permission from anyone to do anything. That's a fact. I simply stated we have different opinions. I feel like you're being defensive and possibly snooty for no reason. That's obviously a judgment I'm making from your text since I can't hear the tone of your voice through your computer lol I think we're proving the point of difference of opinion and interpretation of what we see and hear. Have a good one. I hope we can both enjoy the movie when it finally comes out.
@@Emilaria it's literally just the first teaser...