Idiots In Cars 199
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 12. 2023
- Idiots In Cars - Idiots In Cars Compilation | Idiots In Cars 199
Idiots In Cars / Idiots In Cars ~ Idiots In Cars Caught On Dash Cam
We believe this footage can be used as an educational and informational guide for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations to prevent any future incidents or mishaps! The purpose of this video is to raise awareness and learn from other's driving mistakes. Also, only a small percentage of people that watch my videos are actually subscribed so if you end up liking this video consider subscribing it's free and you can always change your mind. Enjoy the video.
Submit your dash cam footage / contact for removal: whtdashcam@gmail.com
Special thanks to:
Ivan Ch.
Foqsi.
Jerry Dodge.
Jourdan S.
Front & Rear footage of getting rear ended - • Oct 15 Car Accident
Car accident heading to work - • Video
Dash cam Highway 17 crash in the rain - • Dash cam Highway 17 cr...
T-bone collision! - • Ridgeline T-BONE COLLI...
Almost sideswiped on I-495 North in Andover Mass - • Almost sideswiped on I...
Work van runs red light - close call - • Work van runs red ligh...
Bad Driver in Cleburne, TX - • Bad Driver in Cleburne... - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Thanks for watching and drive safely!
Submit your footage: whtdashcam@gmail.com
Last clip gotta love the inbreds that honk at you for getting cut off
If this gets 50K views, this is our celebration!!!🎉🎉🎉
@DashcamNation1 idiots in cars 198 isn’t on your channel. how come? what happened? did you just forget to post it??
It’s always funny seeing certain cammers send in their videos thinking we’re going to agree with their recklessness or idiocy!
Which one in this video are you referring to?
@@kirkmooneyhamIt’s none particularly that bad in this video (just 2:05 being a a-hole), but in general it’s always a cammer or two who’re in the wrong, but send videos here thinking we’ll agree with them when in actuality, they’re in the wrong!
This video actually lacked entitled cammers, I only saw one or two that I’d say were wrong.
@@limitedreach4446I agree she was saying he had enough room to back up and he wanted to cause a scene.
@@limitedreach4446 The laws can be weird though. In the accident his car was not in motion at all, in this case he'll almost certainty not be found guilty, but if his car was in motion I could see how some poorly written law could get him in trouble. I've had an almost identical accident happen to me in a parking lot, I didn't have anywhere to go and laid on the horn for 5 full seconds until the idiot caved in my front right fender.
So in that instance it has also been my personal experience that when someone is backing up and is so oblivious that they don't stop to look when another vehicle is honking constantly it doesn't matter how far back you go they are going to hit you anyway.
“Should I take any action at all to avoid this very slow moving vehicle rolling towards me?
Nah, that would be too sensible.”
-redrum
the guy in the car in front sounds high AF, to me he would have continued to roll back no matter the distance. Also, what if there were other cars behind that could have blocked cam car from backing up?
There's a reason "idiots in cars" is plural
@@sam.ramphall the girl was saying that there was no one behind the cammer
Seriously. When he didn't move, I thought that surely, there was another car right behind him that was preventing him from moving. But then Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb proceed to have a forever argument and we don't see another soul getting impatient with them or working their way around, so i guess not.
He should let her drive, she has more sense.
2:11 my dad is this kind of driver and it's so frustrating to deal with. he would rather get in an accident and be right than prevent the accident all together. Really scary to be in a car with this type of driver, and I hope the girlfriend/wife dumped him.
I can understand what you mean but you can't say because of this one, 1 mph clip that the cammer is a maniac on the road that will get into a crash just to be right.
We don't know what is behind the cammer. He honked, so he *did* try to avoid it in some sort. The car in front hit HIM, can't really expect cammer to be the worst out of the 2.
Also looks like an insurance fraud anyway.
Saying you want his relationship dissolved because he has a fucking spine and didn't knuckle under to what was clearly an insurance scam is unhinged and you deserve what you're wishing upon him instead for it
It’s like these guys forget that they were taught to be defensive drivers in drivers ed. If the damage on his car is enough to warrant a trip to the mechanics then his insurance will probably argue that he didn’t try to avoid the accident because he was half-heartedly honking and his gf or wife literally said he had plenty of room to back up. Being right shouldn’t come at the cost of a pointless confrontation
In the UK at least it is illegal. Cam car was just as much in the wrong as he did not prevent the accident when he could have done.
2:09 - That is the sound of irreconcilable differences, my friends.
yeah, i wouldn't want to be with someone who seeks out conflict over something stupid and avoidable
Exactly my thoughts. I hope she makes the right choice. You woulnd't want to have that as the father of your child.
jfc you guys are making moral conundrums for this couple on a 60 second clip of a little bumper tap.
@@jessicabecause3717It’s the fact the guy never acknowledges his wife and what is she is saying. Like at all. Just 100% focused on being right.
ya especially if one is a scumbag and the other(cammer) is some self righteous douche
1:40 "We'll let the customer work out the bugs" This guy deserved it
Todd Howard at the wheel.
I thought so at first but I think it was the guy on the phone that said that.
2:41 what an idiot he had plenty time and room to back up yet sit there like a deer caught in headlights 😬
I drove a stick shift for years. If you can't feel that thing rolling backwards you probably shouldn't drive one. I see this all the time now.
There is no way you see this all the time. Less than 5% of the country drives manuals. Also, correct that he should've felt it moving.
@@dae57 I watch a lot of these wreck videos. I have seen 5 or 6 of the exact same incidents in the last month or two. I have had it happened to me twice in my life. So maybe a lil hyperbolic.
I agree with the passenger; she literally asked him why he couldn't just back up, and he refused because he WANTED the guy to hit him.
BTW, in most states a vehicle that's reversing has the Right-of-Way. Notice that the cammer got a ticket for Following too Closely.
@@dae57 average american forgetting other countries exist
@@charlieschuder9976 Is that with the reverse lights illuminated or do those rolling in reverse through neglect have the right of way? I mean if you're rolling or intentionally reversing is it the law 3 or 4 cars behind the reversing car must simultaneously and in sync reverse because the reversing driver has the right of way?
Is that it? Help me understand.
2:11 Dude, why didn’t you back up? Sounds like you could have but chose not to: why?
I wouldn’t be surprised if the clueless one would have kept rolling backward and hitting them anyway.
the woman is clearly the brains in that relationship
@@spyderborg lol as I see more and more women are more commonly the brains in the relationship, sad how stupid men have gotten
If they had pursued in insurance claims, the cam driver would definitely be at fault for the "Last Clear Chance" which would consider which party had the last opportunity to avoid the accident that caused the "harm". Even with audio on as well, clearly the woman knew what to do which doesn't help his clip if he sent it in
@@ichiroudesu_. You could probably argue it either way, but I'm not sure a last clear chance rule really applies in this case, since the car in front was the only one moving.
2:50 in the cammer saying several times ""let him hit me" and taking no evasive action will instantly screw you with insurance companies
@2:11 some people are too caught up in “right”. I remember a professor telling us that she missed the light near school because a line of people ran the red light and then her light went red. One student said she had the right to go in that situation so she should have just went and the professor said she’d rather not have a wrecked car just to be right.
I’ve been in a similar situation to this guy and it was actually the reason I bought a dashcam. The guy backed up past the crosswalk but didn’t get out of reverse. Out of caution I backed up as far as I could and as soon as the light turned green, the guy backed up to where my car previously was. If I hadn’t moved I would have been hit.
Just because you have right of way doesn't mean dealing with the aftermath is worth it.
Plus in some places the moment anyone hears "i'm gonna let her hit me" its automatically a 50/50 fault. You are supposed to drive to avoid a crash, even if you wouldn't be at fault. If you intentionally let a crash happen when you could have easily avoided it, then some places will give you partial fault as well.
True that, but if you have the video to prove it was the other person’s fault, more times than not, their insurance will reimburse you for whatever expenses you get as a result of the accident. So it sort of creates an impetus for people with brains to not make dumb mistakes like that guy in the clip.
Without a dash cam, at least 9 times out of 10, the cops will say it was the cammer’s fault. In which case, the exact opposite result happens………
Seriously, if he is determined to be such an idiot, he should let her drive; we'll all be safer. If I were the insurance, I'd put half on him because he had plenty of opportunity to avoid it.
"Out of caution I backed up as far as I could"
Yeah and what is cammer couldn't? Or if it was just a tiny bit and the car kept rolling into him anyway?
Why blame the cammer when we don't know the entire surroundings. After all, the car in front should have just paid attention and stopped.
@@Re69. probably because everyone with functioning ears heard the girlfriend/wife yelling "back up" and cammer saying "no im gonna let him hit me". Not "there is no room", not "I cant react in time", just him saying he will let the other car hit him.
2:13 "Let him hit me" pretty sure the insurance will actually find you at fault since you had AMPLE time to react and avoid it. Nice job. and bro started getting nasty. Seems like a real nice person to be around.
Exactly. If you see danger and have plenty of time and space to do ANYTHING, and don't do it to get hit, you are not getting insurance...
But, then the guy that hit him started acting like a republican and blamed it on the other guy.
@@lylejohnston4125 Get the political pandering outta here. People of all shades behave this way.
@@lylejohnston4125Well he wasn't exactly wrong.
@@LeScratch89so that makes it right? Y’all aren’t the smartest…
1:55 Dude, a broken bumper isn't worth the fucking moral victory here. Just because you're right, it doesn't mean you aren't being stupid.
You really think that little kiss broke a bumper?
4:05
that dude in the Honda musta clenched so hard...
yikes
2:38 "i've gotta camera" biggest mistake in the video... why give them that information?
Exactly
Not actually a mistake- just trying to solve a problem -If it goes to insurance or even court, the footage will be shared anyway... So how is it a mistake
Big mistake for the camer! He had plenty of chance to back up and didn’t. He specifically said he wanted to be hit. That means he violated the last chance doctrine.
@@tomr3422 Usually the other person goes from being on the offence with insurance and being entitled, to being highly defensive, trying their best not to loose, knowing they can’t win.
People tend to lie to their insurance as well. You can use that to your advantage when you can prove to insurance they’re lying. They tend to stop defending their customer at that point. You gain *nothing* by sharing your hidden cards (bar th he opportunity to gloat “I have you on camera!”). You gain the potential for the idiot in the wrong to dig their own grave.
There’s plenty of examples of people trying to steal or break people’s phones/cameras because they don’t want to be filmed doing something wrong, but I’ve seen at least one example of someone try to break into the car they hit, to take the dash cam. I’ve seen a few examples of people doing it to motorcyclists. So there’s an argument not to share the camera, for your own safety.
The final reason, similar to the first, if you’re actually the one found to be in the wrong… you could be digging your own hole by sharing that you filmed your own idiocy. There’s plenty of people sharing clips of the POV driver complaining, feeling entitled, when the comments section is ripping the driver a new one.
A lot of people beep instead of reacting and avoiding a wreck.
honestly. That dude should;ve listened to his girlfriend. She sounds smarter than him lol
@@McSquirts not sure you replied to the right comment
Don't know which youre specifically referring to, but theres plenty of cases where seeking to avoid a wreck is worse than just honking. In cases where people merge into your lane, there isnt always time or space to avoid. Best to let the offender hit you and get an insurance claim.
In a lot of cases people brake and honk and the same time.
Facts
@@Goldfish_Vender best is avoid if possible. Unfortunately most bad accidents both parties aren’t aware of a wreck prior to happening. Glad most here are minor without serious injuries. Wrecks are a scary thing.
5:30 why is there unlit trucks parked on a highway exit??
That seems extremely dangerous!
Probably sleeping, but yeah this is dumb af.
I watched these with my dad and he loves yelling at the people thinking he can change time 😂
One of my best friend's most-used lines around me: you know they can't hear you, right? 😂
I literally spend half my time watching these videos muttering, "Fucking IDIOT..." as if I was the driver and this was happening in real-time. lol
@@SeahawksFTW2014 that’s what I say and he just gets angry and goes silent
2:00 either insurance fraud or the reason why you should not be on your phone in the car. Because you won't notice you're rolling.
Feels like insurance fraud though, that dude is such a douchebag.
Cammer and roller BOTH seem like douchebags!
The woman screaming at the guy to back up is amazing, I hope she dumped him for not listening. What the heck was he thinking? I'm still trying to figure out what he was trying to accomplish there.
Cammer was already at a complete stop, he shouldn't have had to back up just because the guy in front of him didn't realize he didn't have his foot on the brake.
I’d have backed up. I don’t wanna get any damage on my car. If there was a car behind me I’d have pressed the hooter like nobody’s business
@@N7Crusaderhe shouldn’t have had to but he could’ve
@@N7Crusader Well, considering he knew he was going to be hit if he didn't do something, and he knew exactly what he would need to do to prevent the collision, and he INTENTIONALLY allowed the accident to happen, I think any judge would give the cammer some fault for the accident.
@@squidbadIt's not my job to cater to someone else's stupidity
4:04 must say, that silver car is SUPER lucky!
7:55 probably a hit and run considering the damage in the right corner of their bumper
thats what im thinking, or some jerks joyriding in a stolen car
My first thought was they were inspired by watching Australian dash cams.
Don't play "Race car"
If you see vehicles in ANY lane slowing down = SLOW DOWN
If you approach a curve in the road = SLOW DOWN
if you are driving faster than the posted speed limit=SLOW DOWN
If the road is wet or icy= SLOW DOWN
If it is dark, foggy or smoky = SLOW DOWN
When you approach an intersection = SLOW DOWN
always remember = Just because you think that you have the right of way; does NOT mean that you don't have to yield.
1) Agree
2) It's not a reason to slow down if there are cars in any lane, but I think you explained this wrong.
3) depends on the curve, you do NOT need to slow down.
4) you can drive 5 over the speed limit, cars have speedometer deviation and is also applied on tickets.
5) depends how wet it is, no need to slow down for everything. Icy roads definitely slow down.
6) no need to slow down if it's dark, you have lights duh?? fog depends how foggy it is, no need to slow down for everything.
7) Agree
@@Re69. I reckon that your opinions will change once you have logged many, many more miles. You can also take a quicker route and watch a hundred hours of these "dash cam" accident videos.
Super important that after the first few seconds; you PAUSE the playback and then make a prediction of what will happen next.
I guarantee that you'll never drive through an intersection the same way afterwards.
good luck with your studies-d
@@someguydino6770 I already have a licence, an European one which is more valuable than an American one. I had to spend 3000 for lessons and exams (luckily I passed the exam in 1 attempt) most americans just get taught from their parents, and the same parents are also bad drivers. I have driven many kilometers, that's why I said these things from experience, what my driving instructor told me and what the books actually said. :)
EDIT: You're also not really thinking critically or given any reasoning to why you would slow down like a grandma for every little thing. That's how you also get into accidents.
@@Re69. Just cause you *can* drive the posted limit at night or on damp roads doesn't mean you should. The posted limit is generally the safest maximum assuming good conditions. Any amount of water on the road reduces traction, no matter how small. Visibility is far more limited at night or in any sort of precipitation/fog/smoke than in clear conditions. Both of them affect how quickly you and the machine you're operating can react. And visibility can shift very quickly, especially in fog, going from reasonably clear to whiteout in a few seconds.
You claim to be experienced, but you lack in practical application of that experience. It blatantly shows in how you're resorting to the ad hominem in your edit.
@@LeScratch89
1) I didn't say you should drive the speed limit at night. But driving below the speed limit at night is also not necessary, that's what I'm saying.
2) America has worse infrastructure than Europe so I can understand you should slow down when it's wet sometimes. European roads you can still drive the speed limit and take corners when it's wet. The only time you should slow down is when you it's raining really hard or when you see loads of water laying on the road, our roads are just designed better for rain.
3) Like I said it depends on the fog, there is fog and you can still see traffic from 2 miles in front of you. No need to slow down for fog or rain.
I'm not disagreeing with everything, but yall are being too extreme.
Poor old gentleman probably has no one in his life to give him a ride 😢 4:40
I am glad that the dude with the dash cam stopped, I'd hate to imagine what would have happened the the older gentleman if he hadn't gotten help.
I HATE that this clip is on “Idiots in Cars”!
7:05 Beward a car with a different coloured corner body panel. The driver has no idea where the corners of their vehicle are and have damaged them enough times that they've given up on keeping them the same colour.
And especially beware those cars in Walmart parking lots
Your video helps me be more vigilant when participating in traffic. There are very unexpected situations on the road so I think everyone should go more carefully.
Dash cams make drivers more reckless. Half of these are easily avoidable accidents if you’re actually paying attention. Weather you’re in the right or not.
1:58 Cammer is an absolute goofball. Some much pride but not enough common sense.
Edit: And people need to stop playing the victim card like this person, too. If you can do something about it, then do something.
Edit 2: The problem with footage like 1:58 is that they don’t provide enough information of the incident or dash cam footage, which leads to too much speculation as brought up by another commenter. I still stand by what I said, but understand that, by the camera person, it would be best to not do anything if there was potentially traffic behind them.
We don't know what's behind the car. Maybe he couldn't back up, and if he could perhaps very little bit. Then the car would have still bumped into him ...
It is highly possible that the cammer believe it would be better to let the front car hit him, rather than hitting the car behind.
@@Re69.his wife or girlfriend said he had plenty of room to back up 2:12
So illegally back up into traffic?
8:31 they often only look in 1 direction, but which direction did this guy even look at at all??
Ugh and also the audacity to honk back.
0:08 why didnt he slow down right away?
Not paying attention I assume!
Because he's a dipsht
Oh my gosh, this video is a rollercoaster of emotions!
half hour special for episode 200???
7:00 that is the like 3rd time that same pole has been hit lol
At 1:40..."We'll let the customer work out the bugs." Sounds like the cammer would have deserved that side-swipe "bug" they almost experienced.
2:00 why does he not smash his horn? The one time someone is in a situation in which that kind of horn use would be appropriate,and he just half hartedly slaps it a few times.
Because he's a garbage human being looking for money
Cmon the horn isnt to prevent accidents - Only to show how hurt your feelings are
almost episode 200! yessirrrr!!
0:45 wanna bet both these idiots were saying "oh my god he almost hit me" to each other? TWICE?
0:48 three seconds of honking before the bump... how completely oblivious can one be of what is going on in front of you? too bad there is no rear cam on that one...
At 1:10, that is not hydroplaning, that's worn tires on a low grip surface. You need standing water (puddling water) to hydroplane.
1:46 red truck didn't even care to merge back. Then, he also cuts off that truck!
1:55 If there was enough damage to require taking it to a shop for either vehicle, the cammers insurance is going to be on the hook for doing nothing to avoid the accident. It also wouldn't shock me if the cammers significant other dumps them in the very near future for being such a block head.
That blue blazer in the thumbnail was at my local Walmart here in Topeka
It was even posted on Topeka bad drivers
5:40, it was their responsibility to get up to speed but cammer should have moved over to let them in
Either that or just slowed tf down
Here in the UK we have a law that you have to stay in the inside lane of a motorway unless you are overtaking,is there no such thing in the US.?
They have this "Keep your lane" thing I think.
It's extremely dumb tho it's messy and doesn't work at all.
0:35 "braked too hard"? They braked enough to not hit the car in front of them. That's too hard? They should have just hit the person in front to prevent the rear hit? That caption isn't particularly well-written.
They were very slow to react though. Could've avoided it if the cam car was paying attention
Cam car shouldnt have sped up like that
idk man maybe the caption writer expected you to be able to see the video and put two and two together on distracted driving and slamming on the brakes at the last possible second lmao
1:55 might be that very rare cause when laying on a horn may be helpful.
And it happens to be the one time the person doesn't
0:47 Wow, two idiots in one shot!
I would say it was three idiots!
7:49 - I recognize I-95 anywhere, especially the stretch between DC and Richmond. >_
Anyone else still thinks it's a good idea to let 16 YO get their driver's licenses and NEVER have a follow-up course???? Good job, America...
7:04 You can't park there 😂
People out there driving like it's GTA V.
Be the better driver by assuming everyone else is the worst driver.
Assume they're going to merge without warning, assume they can't see you, assume your own brakes work, and pretend you don't have a dashcam.
You'd rather have it and not need it than need it and it's out for lunch, so just drive like you can't prove anything.
4:02 Were your lights off and you turn them on just before impact?
Cuz thats on you if so.
Yep
@0:44 god I hate this exit ramp so much
It makes no sense
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations what do you mean? One lane goes one way and the other goes another way, how does it not make sense?
@@PkPvre Because the right lane just goes off out of nowhere although there was probably some signage further back. However, there's a similar one near me where it has two exits at the same time that the road turns and it's very confusing.
@@OCC_Plumbing_and_Restorations I would also assume the signage is adequate. If it wasn't then I'd agree with you.
Didn't think I'd see okc on here lol but tbh that stretch of the i40 is really chaotic with a lot of dumb drivers
1:13 You cannot hydroplane when there is no standing water on the road.
I feel like that clip from Dayton explains why I75 North can't go a week without collision-induced standstill traffic.
If you just call it North florida or as some still call it Ohio - its self explanatory
The dude casually listening to an Alan Watts lecture while driving through chaos is my favorite 1:29
*8:00** What did it take a picture of?*
4:26 Two idiots in this clip. Rear driver is indeed at fault, but the pickup truck carries some blame too. He was practically in the intersection when he stopped, so he clearly should have braked way sooner.
as far as i' m aware you need to be able to stop safely in front of a yellow light, that was clearly not the case. he went full emergency stop and didn't even stop in front of the intersection. the car coming up behind him was probably not paying much attention because he basically failed to even slow down
this channel is the reason i got a dash cam for christmas lol
ALMOST EPISODE 200
Dude that second video with I-95 and the US 3 exit that whole merging system sucks. I've seen a few close calls there myself
0:44 had me giggling
8:00 I remember someone doing this as I was going through a light that was out and when I got school I had to make sure my front bumper wasn’t scratched because of how close they got to this day that is probably the closest I’ve gotten to getting into an accident
LETS HOPE WE CAN GET EPISODE 200 BY THE END OF THIS YEAR
6:26 how?
I don't know if anyone else realized, but this video was supposed to be the ''Idiots in cars 198'' instead of 199, and every other next video is supposed to have one number below.
can we agree that these drivers sticking in the left lane are the root cause of some of these accidents.
4:24 can't really see the light so can't know who's at fault.
If the light just turned yellow, you're supposed to continue
If the light was yellow for a long time, then the silver car would have ran a red light for sure
The silver car is obviously at fault and you have to be really freaking stupid to think otherwise.
I watch this to go to slee☺😊
They said im bout to go to warrrrrrrr, bout toooooo
"I'm gonna let them hit me"
Well there goes any chance of getting insurance to cover. That's why you never have your mic on until after the incident
5:51 Oklahoma City. I had an accident in just about that same spot almost 30 years ago. My fault. I was distracted by a driver behind me and I rear-ended a car in front of me. His car barely had a scratch, but my front end was really messed up.
5:55 Is this a trick of the cameras, or does that one car just have some really obnoxious brake lights?
It's the camera. LED lights will look like this on cameras due to the way they are powered in cars. They're not constantly powered, they're flicked on and off very fast to look smoothly on to the human eye, but on a camera they will flicker.
I don’t think videos of medical emergency situations should be on here tbh😬
@0:45 8DDF 60 looks like the plate. And go call it in. A person can be held 100% responsible for a wreck they caused but were not directly involved in.
seems like cammer in the first clip wasn't paying attention too
Some of these drivers make SpongeBob look like a competent driver-
0:44 The camera car driver was not who I expected to get hit, but with how they rushed up behind the Camry that didn't cause the slowdown and then mashing the horn, I actually find it humorous.
It's concerning you think the camera car is in anyway in the wrong
except the unexcept when driving espically in florida@@KaiNausicaa
What do you mean "didn't cause the slowdown"? Are you blind?
@@PkPvreAre you? Did you see the Volvo that went straight from the right lane?
@@Tripsaas01 I mean, the Camry was definitely to blame as well with almost coming to a full stop. But yeah the Volvo definitely was the main culprit, just both fucked up hard :s
4:15 breakneck speeds
Guy in the Honda needs new pants.
1:54 I want to say this is why we own dash cams, but I can't. We own dash cams to send video to our insurance company. This is just a mild annoyance, but it annoyed me way more than it should have lmao
Very first one: this has nothing to do with the cammer getting rear-ended, but don't enter an intersection unless you can clear the intersection.
Too many people are more focused on slamming their horn than to actually attempt to dodge or brake.
These drivers had a perfectly good reason for speeding through lights. Haven’t you guys seen Speed? Shit happens more than you think.
If someone wants to go first I don’t care. Go first. Just don’t hit me.
That guy who slowly rolled back had to of been illegal, trying to get some insurance claim scam shit
1:53 - could just have been all avoided if the dude behind him was trying to avoid it. People used to look out for each other back in the day. I guess its not like that anymore
7:40 Racing or mutual high speed road raging. Either should be a one year license suspension for the first offence.
i feel so bad for the cammer in 0:54
anyone know the song at 3:48?
Darude-Sandstorm. It’s a classic
6:47 on xmas eve
2:29 i have dealt with this same car at least once, they live in my old neighborhood and can't drive... typical for utah
@6:07 Shoutout to fellow GVF fan
Next part is 200!
4:22 😂😂 chsm viste?
Holy shit at 8:02 is my town!!!
0:50 License plate looks like it is 8D0F 60, 8DOF 60, or 8DDF 60. Possibly the 8 could be a B. If I can tell that from the video, cammer should be able to as well. If they can tell the make and model of the car, there's probably only 6 options for what the license plate could be.
Doesn't even matter. Dashcammer had a valid reason to perform an emergency stop. Car behind him was either not paying attention or following too close and is therefore to blame.
Dashcammer will be compensated even without getting the volvo's info.
@@BDM276 True, but maybe the Volvo could have gotten a ticket.
4:25 even if they did give enough time, the person wasn’t paying attention because their reaction time on braking was really slow. Anyone who was paying attention would have been able to stop in time.
That truck is already completely in the intersection the entire thing. Even if its red he should have kept going to get out of the intersection. Guy behind him was obviously not paying enough attention, but still both are bad.
5:55 greta van fleet