SUGGESTIONS 1) use an intense UV light source to leverage the photoelectric/photoconductive effects to increase the supply of conduction band electrons in the metal 2) a helmholtz coil would provide a more uniform B field 3) use multiple layers and be mindful of the thickness for the skin effect 4) don't use any ferrous metal - you just end up spending energy fighting the remanence of electron spins 5) off-load all the heavy bits and only 'fly' the layers because the weight loss, if any, could be too small at first and having the lightest-weight components on the scale might give clarity to what's going on with the weight (EXAMPLE: a guy shows up for a physical exam at his army base in an M1-A2 Abrams tank. "Doc, I want you to get my body weight by weighing the entire tank with me inside, then we'll subtract off the weight of the tank to get my body weight"). It would be encouraging to discover a small effect that could be built up. I know you guys already know all this stuff but thought to mention it. It was a good demo. If it's not working as the inventor claimed, might be worth it to get creative with the design and testing to try wringing out an effect. .
I, for one, am not well versed in this but find it fascinating as hell. I appreciate you taking the time to share your insights as it adds to when I can take away from this video.
@@allhonesty848 Like Falcon Space and several other participants, our small group creates test devices that attempt to concentrate an artificial gravity field - the equation for magnetic field (B field) strength is: *B = uNI/L* where u = magnetic permeability (ability of the material to be magnetically polarized), N = number of turns of wire in the coil (electromagnet), I = current applied to the wire, and L = length. Length "L" being in the denominator is (conceptually) crucial for an artgrav test device. If your test device is too spread out physically, it reduces the intensity of the field. Notice that if "L" increases, the equation shows that the B field (magnetic field) is reduced. So you want to concentrate the effect you're creating. There are three ways to boost artificial gravity: 1) increase the density per unit volume of space of the field - for a magnet, you'd need "L" to be a tiny as possible (example: if Earth was cut up into lots of small pieces, we could all become weightless; Earth concentrates its gravity field) 2) use a high-magnetic permeability, low-hysteresis material (Metglas is perfect) for each layer of the device 3) create coherent accelerations of the charged particles in the layers A helmoltz pair of coils oriented vertically,, one on top, one beneath a small multi-layer test device, and eddy current coils to induce current flow at 90 degrees to the B field, creates coherent accelerations of the charged particles in the layers by way of the Lorentz force. If you look at the photo of the 1952 UFO at Barra da Tijuca, you'll see a circular ridge in the hull conceivably covering a large coil (see www.openminds.tv/ufo-photos-captured-in-barra-da-tijuca-brazil-may-7-1952/24334 for example). Metglas can flip magnetic moments of the charged particles in the test device layers with the smallest hysteresis. Metglas is amorphous metal created by thin film deposition (sputtering, vapor deposition, etc). Falcon Space uses vapor deposition to create their layers. The amorphous metal does not form a crystalline atomic lattice structure and unlike ferrous materials (iron, nickel, cobalt, or alloys of those), when very high frequency coherent accelerations are applied to the charged particles, they will spin-flip quite easily, at least compared to ferrous material. The magnetic permeability of air/space is only 0.0000012566. The magnetic permeability of sputtered Metglas is 1.25, which is one million times greater than air. The ARV also has a large coil producing a vertically-oriented magnetic field, and layers of non-ferrous metals its lower level. May not be coincidence. .
Don't use any ferrous metal for induction? Do you not know how an electromagnet works? If you just use copper your only going to get a one way effect. Which is not a push pull polarity. What you suggest is. A pull pull polarity which will actually make it gain weight. Pushing it down into the ground. You know nothing
@@TheTruth1sPower The Truth - my gawd we need more of that these days. I encourage you to spread the truth as far and wide as you're capable. We use aluminum foil. We have some disdain for wasting energy fighting the remanence, the hysteresis of the iron atoms in ferrous metals. The wasted torque, the heating up, is reduced with remanence out of the way, by using non-ferrous metals. We use store-bought aluminum foil, 0.0008 inch thickness, which indicates a drive frequency of 16.28Mhz relying on skin depth, in one of our devices. I seriously doubt the graviflyer relies on hysteresis or remanence. If you think about how a secondary in a transformer only briefly registers a current when the primary magnetic field changes, that's a physical indication that the remanence/hysteresis in the transformer core does NOT help in the persistence of the induction, ie. changes nothing about how long the induction lasts. All those spin-aligned electrons in the ferrous core serve is to increase the volume of the dielectric affected by the pulse of current put through the primary winding , but not the persistence (ie. how long the induction lasts). The dielectric quenches away the 'shock wave' effect imposed on the secondary winding by the briefly-aligned dipoles in the region of the dielectric adjacent to the transformer windings. The dielectric very quickly re-randomizes the dipole constituents of the dielectric. As to knowing how electromagnets work - we had to figure out the dielectric (aka 'empty' space) before we started building devices, in order to know the medium we were trying to manipulate. To manipulate the dielectric - which is what the graviflyer attempts to do - without knowing the makeup of it - to us, it felt like trying to design a submarine without knowing what its medium (seawater) was.
One thing that I find a bit weird when i looked at the videos that charles sent me was that apparently theres more than 10Kv supposedly on the plates but somehow the guy is able to grab the wires and/or plates without any problem. Even if it were a small current you would stil expect something to shock you a bit. Also in a few vids he puts a ring over but its out of shot...
@@Insanity_Demon The +/- 10kV is only on the two rotors. He doesn't touch those. The Tesla coil is very high frequency AC Voltage, it doesn't give a shock when you're touching it, anymore than a radio antenna.
@@ToddDesiato Oh I thought he did touch those plates, ill go look at it again, are the motor shafts insulated? Even at HF and HV you would still expect to receive a shock but it would be on the surface of your skin which is more of a burn at those frequencies, I'm assuming 2MHz range.
I think you should consider balancing the disc by repositioning the magnets or adding small weights. Alternatively, you could try using a pre-made disc that's already professionally balanced like a gear, pulley or flywheel or something.
People want to believe in something bigger than themselves. They want to be able to help all of humanity. Whether it be riches, fame, or position of power, this desire stems from the need for God created in every one of us. This device is fascinating. It is the outward manifestation of an inward heart. To be a part of an earth-changing life-saving reality.
Hey Mark, have you connected with Nam Tran any time recently? He has four gravitator-type device videos on his channel and it might be good to get his input since it looks like he’s getting thrust from them. I’ve been considering recently that you might want to try dielectrics with electron tunneling capabilities, with the idea being you want some electrons to pass between plates (for quantized inertia effects).
Could you not replace the spinning motors (with permanent magnets) with 6 electromagnets and create rotating fields top and bottom? Would be much easier to tune with same effect..
Why don't you send a trusted colleague to meet with Alexey Chekurkov in Russia to see if this device really works before spending so much time and money testing something that you've only seen on video (so easy to fake nowdays).This would be money well spent and you would know for sure . Still I love your dedication to exprimenting.
@MyTBrain @AlienScientist @AidanShaffer some things I noticed. 1) You have the middle plate upside down you want the lip facing downwards in the flow if air. 2)Also have to run fine sandpaper over the metal disks and then poor hydrogen peroxide on the metal to make micro pits in the metal on all 3 disks as they have to be treated. 3) You will find this info interesting: czcams.com/video/pPLhMLWn-GI/video.html
Wow thats a nice unit, looks kool too and thanks for making the video.... But are you sure the Graviflyer actually works? Cause when I watched the vid at :15+ seconds in the video, im looking at monofiliment line or some type of wire at the left side then top of the screen for the first video of the red one.... I mean why would there be any type of almost invisible line in a video that ur tryin to prove antigravity, and its way too thin n small to be a power supply wire or sumpn.... I dont know man, i jus wanna make sure uv seen that and then made judgement on whether or not to build this thing. Peace n Blessings All
Wouldn't it be better to put the high voltage on the central disc? Wouldn't making the high voltage going to the discs with the magnets make them lose their magnetism due to the heat of the spark? Another thing is that if the two discs with the magnets rotated in the same direction and the central disc could also rotate, but in the opposite direction of the magnets, wouldn't it make the speed difference greater and the induction effect on the central aluminum plate increase, and thereby also increasing the chance of the equipment becoming sustained in the air?
I'm seeing the same thing with this project as the last one I commented on. With some adjustments to my last comment, this is just a copy and paste from my other comment from the other project as all the same principles apply to this project as well. How well-balanced are all of these components? A deviation as small as Just a few thousandths (0.001) of an inch tolerance or in terms of weight, a few thousandths Gm/milligram (0.001) or in some cases (0.0001) can be enough to cause unwanted artifacts in the desired/necessary balance/resonance frequency especially when there are this many moving parts. Something as small as just a slip yoke in one or multiple of the drive shafts being "out of tune/unbalanced" can cause a failure. This is also true when building high-horsepower race motors, clutches, pistons, and shafts which are in my case about 100x the weight of this contraption you have here. I would imagine the margins can be smaller in a model this size. Just some food for thought. Hope this helps in some way. BTW Lubrication is also vital with these types of things. You might want to keep track of the weight of the lubrication/oils you test. I also heard you saying something about Stronger mounting for the main motor. If the tolerances are loose enough for that type of vibration to occur, you definitely need to balance every moving part. You can get that thing cooking pretty fast without it shaking at ALL if you take care of these things and hopefully get rid of the bigger swinging motion.
Ahi solo se ven dos volantes de inercia que van en sentido opuesto, hasta ahi muy correcto, lo que no se es pk dopais los volantes de inercia con exceso de electrones. vale le subis y le bajais la inercia con exceso de electrones y teneis volantes de inercia mas ligeros para los estabilizadores. vale ya se va entendiendo mas. Pero me puede alguien explicar donde estan el resto de los estabilizadores y pk no habeis diseñado un sistema de modulacion del alto voltaje para poder subir y para cambiar de direccion y manibrar? Lo teneis todo delante pero no lo estais entendiendo !!!!!!
Remove the magnets from the bottom (what's on the disc)they do not have any function (they create vibration), the disks should be placed (spinning) closer, so it was in the drawings.Schauberger) but I think it's all fake)
werent the rotating plates on the original closer together? It´s hard to believe that no one can get this darn contraption to do what its supposed to do. Ive listened to the theorists and I dont think there reasoning is correct with this. Anyways you get 11 out of 10 for trying.
NOT! That Russian guy is laughing his ass off right now! How many Americans does it take to make a juicer?!!! And they forgot the tall grass. You gotta have the tall grass and trees in the background!😂
Exactly. The russian guy was fun and all with his props and hanging bread toaster, but for the life of me I cannot understand why replicating such a dumb mockup. Those fellows have machines, but obviously skipped their Science lessons, laws of Physics can’t be broken unless you’re at the quantum level. But as a clickbait yes, the mission is fulfilled.
This looks like a typical "mad scientist" operation: * Camera work all over the place * No explanation FIRST of what is trying to be done or achieved * Zero explanation of the eccentric "mechanical" rubbing/scraping noise when the first motor fires up and it never goes away, just gets worse * Loads and loads of interplay chat without a single word of explanation of what is being discussed or done or why * Continual zooming in/out waving the camera around like it's a rag in the wind Verdict? 100% uninformative! UTTERLY useless in every way! 🤔😢👎
I can tell by the design and electrical supply setup that whoever built this has no idea what they are doing. Stop trying to explain it when it doesnt even work. You make yourself look crazy. Boy who cried wolf
And have fun spending thousands on the correct type of metals you need for this. I took the plunge. It all arrives next week im so excited. This is my moment in time. Not yours.
That is not as good as the Russian guy Graviflyer , and his is very quiet yours makes a racket very noisy you need better motors and the metal you use is not correct .
you used maybe one thing Alexey used and I don't think you really used even one. why does everyone think they can do something someone else has done and not do exactly what he did and used. Alexey had 2 different fans, pezo and he used a car battery not some big ass mega KW machine. you guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill. Make one with the same parts and set up like Alexey did. I have his parts list with everything he used with links straight to where to buy everything. it came from one of his kits. you will never get that thing up in the air and if you do how are you going to run all them fancy machines in a field? get back to the basics like Alexey was using.
very good experiment that shows no weight loss. No. 2 this is not how graviflyer works in Alix's design. No. 3 you must hire a monkey from a zoo and let him work in your lab. Something will happen. One thing for sure is remarkable is the replica of graviflyer but it did not work.
I stand the hell up and salute you guys for having the Guts to actually build something and test it. Well Done !
That's a good way to loose an eye!
I’m afraid you guys got bamboozled 😆
SUGGESTIONS
1) use an intense UV light source to leverage the photoelectric/photoconductive effects to increase the supply of conduction band electrons in the metal
2) a helmholtz coil would provide a more uniform B field
3) use multiple layers and be mindful of the thickness for the skin effect
4) don't use any ferrous metal - you just end up spending energy fighting the remanence of electron spins
5) off-load all the heavy bits and only 'fly' the layers because the weight loss, if any, could be too small at first and having the lightest-weight components on the scale might give clarity to what's going on with the weight (EXAMPLE: a guy shows up for a physical exam at his army base in an M1-A2 Abrams tank. "Doc, I want you to get my body weight by weighing the entire tank with me inside, then we'll subtract off the weight of the tank to get my body weight"). It would be encouraging to discover a small effect that could be built up.
I know you guys already know all this stuff but thought to mention it. It was a good demo.
If it's not working as the inventor claimed, might be worth it to get creative with the design and testing to try wringing out an effect.
.
I, for one, am not well versed in this but find it fascinating as hell. I appreciate you taking the time to share your insights as it adds to when I can take away from this video.
@@allhonesty848 Like Falcon Space and several other participants, our small group creates test devices that attempt to concentrate an artificial gravity field - the equation for magnetic field (B field) strength is:
*B = uNI/L* where u = magnetic permeability (ability of the material to be magnetically polarized), N = number of turns of wire in the coil (electromagnet), I = current applied to the wire, and L = length.
Length "L" being in the denominator is (conceptually) crucial for an artgrav test device. If your test device is too spread out physically, it reduces the intensity of the field. Notice that if "L" increases, the equation shows that the B field (magnetic field) is reduced. So you want to concentrate the effect you're creating.
There are three ways to boost artificial gravity:
1) increase the density per unit volume of space of the field - for a magnet, you'd need "L" to be a tiny as possible (example: if Earth was cut up into lots of small pieces, we could all become weightless; Earth concentrates its gravity field)
2) use a high-magnetic permeability, low-hysteresis material (Metglas is perfect) for each layer of the device
3) create coherent accelerations of the charged particles in the layers
A helmoltz pair of coils oriented vertically,, one on top, one beneath a small multi-layer test device, and eddy current coils to induce current flow at 90 degrees to the B field, creates coherent accelerations of the charged particles in the layers by way of the Lorentz force.
If you look at the photo of the 1952 UFO at Barra da Tijuca, you'll see a circular ridge in the hull conceivably covering a large coil (see www.openminds.tv/ufo-photos-captured-in-barra-da-tijuca-brazil-may-7-1952/24334 for example).
Metglas can flip magnetic moments of the charged particles in the test device layers with the smallest hysteresis. Metglas is amorphous metal created by thin film deposition (sputtering, vapor deposition, etc).
Falcon Space uses vapor deposition to create their layers. The amorphous metal does not form a crystalline atomic lattice structure and unlike ferrous materials (iron, nickel, cobalt, or alloys of those), when very high frequency coherent accelerations are applied to the charged particles, they will spin-flip quite easily, at least compared to ferrous material.
The magnetic permeability of air/space is only 0.0000012566.
The magnetic permeability of sputtered Metglas is 1.25, which is one million times greater than air.
The ARV also has a large coil producing a vertically-oriented magnetic field, and layers of non-ferrous metals its lower level. May not be coincidence.
.
Don't use any ferrous metal for induction? Do you not know how an electromagnet works? If you just use copper your only going to get a one way effect. Which is not a push pull polarity. What you suggest is. A pull pull polarity which will actually make it gain weight. Pushing it down into the ground. You know nothing
@@TheTruth1sPower The Truth - my gawd we need more of that these days. I encourage you to spread the truth as far and wide as you're capable.
We use aluminum foil. We have some disdain for wasting energy fighting the remanence, the hysteresis of the iron atoms in ferrous metals. The wasted torque, the heating up, is reduced with remanence out of the way, by using non-ferrous metals.
We use store-bought aluminum foil, 0.0008 inch thickness, which indicates a drive frequency of 16.28Mhz relying on skin depth, in one of our devices.
I seriously doubt the graviflyer relies on hysteresis or remanence.
If you think about how a secondary in a transformer only briefly registers a current when the primary magnetic field changes, that's a physical indication that the remanence/hysteresis in the transformer core does NOT help in the persistence of the induction, ie. changes nothing about how long the induction lasts.
All those spin-aligned electrons in the ferrous core serve is to increase the volume of the dielectric affected by the pulse of current put through the primary winding , but not the persistence (ie. how long the induction lasts).
The dielectric quenches away the 'shock wave' effect imposed on the secondary winding by the briefly-aligned dipoles in the region of the dielectric adjacent to the transformer windings. The dielectric very quickly re-randomizes the dipole constituents of the dielectric.
As to knowing how electromagnets work - we had to figure out the dielectric (aka 'empty' space) before we started building devices, in order to know the medium we were trying to manipulate.
To manipulate the dielectric - which is what the graviflyer attempts to do - without knowing the makeup of it - to us, it felt like trying to design a submarine without knowing what its medium (seawater) was.
Guy's, I'm really starting to believe this whole thing is a hoax, and we all fell for it.
One thing that I find a bit weird when i looked at the videos that charles sent me was that apparently theres more than 10Kv supposedly on the plates but somehow the guy is able to grab the wires and/or plates without any problem. Even if it were a small current you would stil expect something to shock you a bit. Also in a few vids he puts a ring over but its out of shot...
@@Insanity_Demon The +/- 10kV is only on the two rotors. He doesn't touch those. The Tesla coil is very high frequency AC Voltage, it doesn't give a shock when you're touching it, anymore than a radio antenna.
@@ToddDesiato Oh I thought he did touch those plates, ill go look at it again, are the motor shafts insulated? Even at HF and HV you would still expect to receive a shock but it would be on the surface of your skin which is more of a burn at those frequencies, I'm assuming 2MHz range.
Do you know what current he uses on the TC?
Im not certain yet. But i am glad i concentrated on other things.
Their are a lot of moving parts.
More then id like to be working with
13:27 "anger voltage" thats pretty metal
Just subbed 💥
Crazy !
Really great, the first video I watched, I do not know
I think you should consider balancing the disc by repositioning the magnets or adding small weights. Alternatively, you could try using a pre-made disc that's already professionally balanced like a gear, pulley or flywheel or something.
It’s alive!
your goal should be to create a stable resonence and genrate a uniform arcfield. You need a high conductivity center plate. Platinum would be ideal
People want to believe in something bigger than themselves. They want to be able to help all of humanity. Whether it be riches, fame, or position of power, this desire stems from the need for God created in every one of us. This device is fascinating. It is the outward manifestation of an inward heart. To be a part of an earth-changing life-saving reality.
Hey Mark, have you connected with Nam Tran any time recently? He has four gravitator-type device videos on his channel and it might be good to get his input since it looks like he’s getting thrust from them. I’ve been considering recently that you might want to try dielectrics with electron tunneling capabilities, with the idea being you want some electrons to pass between plates (for quantized inertia effects).
I would at least use a plexiglass shield or something in front of the spinning magnets.
Is this based on the Alexey C invention? Alot of parameters to control and finding the right combination could take a long time. Good luck!
Yeah. This is cool stuff. Watch your results when you get lift-off.
here can I find the textured aluminum disk? Please help.
Maybe having metal shavings in a dielectric like oil is like a rouge series of Casimir cavities.
Could you not replace the spinning motors (with permanent magnets) with 6 electromagnets and create rotating fields top and bottom? Would be much easier to tune with same effect..
Why don't you send a trusted colleague to meet with Alexey Chekurkov in Russia to see if this device really works before spending so much time and money testing something that you've only seen on video (so easy to fake nowdays).This would be money well spent and you would know for sure . Still I love your dedication to exprimenting.
Agree. Replicate his device exactly before changing anything.
@MyTBrain @AlienScientist @AidanShaffer some things I noticed.
1) You have the middle plate upside down you want the lip facing downwards in the flow if air.
2)Also have to run fine sandpaper over the metal disks and then poor hydrogen peroxide on the metal to make micro pits in the metal on all 3 disks as they have to be treated.
3) You will find this info interesting: czcams.com/video/pPLhMLWn-GI/video.html
The first i would have ensure was du balance the rotors !
What exactly is the theory of operation?
Wow thats a nice unit, looks kool too and thanks for making the video.... But are you sure the Graviflyer actually works? Cause when I watched the vid at :15+ seconds in the video, im looking at monofiliment line or some type of wire at the left side then top of the screen for the first video of the red one.... I mean why would there be any type of almost invisible line in a video that ur tryin to prove antigravity, and its way too thin n small to be a power supply wire or sumpn.... I dont know man, i jus wanna make sure uv seen that and then made judgement on whether or not to build this thing. Peace n Blessings All
Congratulations!
You have invented the spinning top.
😂😂it’s crayz how people think that it will actualy fly
+1 Darwin award for not wearing goggles - but still good stuff though 😅
Wouldn't it be better to put the high voltage on the central disc? Wouldn't making the high voltage going to the discs with the magnets make them lose their magnetism due to the heat of the spark?
Another thing is that if the two discs with the magnets rotated in the same direction and the central disc could also rotate, but in the opposite direction of the magnets, wouldn't it make the speed difference greater and the induction effect on the central aluminum plate increase, and thereby also increasing the chance of the equipment becoming sustained in the air?
Spin the disk at Realvistic speed and it will rise off the table. Roughly 1.2 million rpm
No bearing budget?
I'm seeing the same thing with this project as the last one I commented on. With some adjustments to my last comment, this is just a copy and paste from my other comment from the other project as all the same principles apply to this project as well.
How well-balanced are all of these components? A deviation as small as Just a few thousandths (0.001) of an inch tolerance or in terms of weight, a few thousandths Gm/milligram (0.001) or in some cases (0.0001) can be enough to cause unwanted artifacts in the desired/necessary balance/resonance frequency especially when there are this many moving parts. Something as small as just a slip yoke in one or multiple of the drive shafts being "out of tune/unbalanced" can cause a failure. This is also true when building high-horsepower race motors, clutches, pistons, and shafts which are in my case about 100x the weight of this contraption you have here. I would imagine the margins can be smaller in a model this size. Just some food for thought. Hope this helps in some way. BTW Lubrication is also vital with these types of things. You might want to keep track of the weight of the lubrication/oils you test. I also heard you saying something about Stronger mounting for the main motor. If the tolerances are loose enough for that type of vibration to occur, you definitely need to balance every moving part. You can get that thing cooking pretty fast without it shaking at ALL if you take care of these things and hopefully get rid of the bigger swinging motion.
I can't tell if you guys are perpetuating the practical joke, or if you have just fallen for it...
Do you have a planes is it?
I'll like of make is it.
Hoax or not, this is a learning curve for everyone involved.
Ahi solo se ven dos volantes de inercia que van en sentido opuesto, hasta ahi muy correcto, lo que no se es pk dopais los volantes de inercia con exceso de electrones. vale le subis y le bajais la inercia con exceso de electrones y teneis volantes de inercia mas ligeros para los estabilizadores. vale ya se va entendiendo mas. Pero me puede alguien explicar donde estan el resto de los estabilizadores y pk no habeis diseñado un sistema de modulacion del alto voltaje para poder subir y para cambiar de direccion y manibrar?
Lo teneis todo delante pero no lo estais entendiendo !!!!!!
Not seeing it take off, it seems to be heavy
Yeah, I am sure that is the problem and the fact it is based off a Hoax has nothing to do with it.
Remove the magnets from the bottom (what's on the disc)they do not have any function (they create vibration), the disks should be placed (spinning) closer, so it was in the drawings.Schauberger) but I think it's all fake)
I saw alexey used Ultrasound machine, Tesla coil and battery. He has now deleted some of the videos on his channel.
I cant believe people have been this suckered in by a hoax.
Said the guy who has no clue what hes talking about.
Has anyone actually built or seen a working model? Where is the inventor? He is strangely quiet, which is not normal.
Just wear safety goggles next time. If that thing explodes in your face, you'll never forgive yourself again!
werent the rotating plates on the original closer together? It´s hard to believe that no one can get this darn contraption to do what its supposed to do. Ive listened to the theorists and I dont think there reasoning is correct with this. Anyways you get 11 out of 10 for trying.
NOT! That Russian guy is laughing his ass off right now! How many Americans does it take to make a juicer?!!! And they forgot the tall grass. You gotta have the tall grass and trees in the background!😂
LOL, and don't forget the anti-grav mono filament and piano-wire supports!
Exactly. The russian guy was fun and all with his props and hanging bread toaster, but for the life of me I cannot understand why replicating such a dumb mockup. Those fellows have machines, but obviously skipped their Science lessons, laws of Physics can’t be broken unless you’re at the quantum level. But as a clickbait yes, the mission is fulfilled.
Why would anyone think that this would work?
Un employed people
This looks like a typical "mad scientist" operation:
* Camera work all over the place
* No explanation FIRST of what is trying to be done or achieved
* Zero explanation of the eccentric "mechanical" rubbing/scraping noise when the first motor fires up and it never goes away, just gets worse
* Loads and loads of interplay chat without a single word of explanation of what is being discussed or done or why
* Continual zooming in/out waving the camera around like it's a rag in the wind
Verdict? 100% uninformative! UTTERLY useless in every way! 🤔😢👎
????
I can tell by the design and electrical supply setup that whoever built this has no idea what they are doing.
Stop trying to explain it when it doesnt even work. You make yourself look crazy. Boy who cried wolf
Unbalanced Centrapedal thrust and oscillation
And have fun spending thousands on the correct type of metals you need for this. I took the plunge. It all arrives next week im so excited. This is my moment in time. Not yours.
Что за бред я только что посмотрел.....
это попытка реплики аппарата Алексея Чекуркова
That is not as good as the Russian guy Graviflyer , and his is very quiet yours makes a racket very noisy you need better motors and the metal you use is not correct .
It's a hoax. Graviflyer is a bust. Anyone surprised?
you used maybe one thing Alexey used and I don't think you really used even one. why does everyone think they can do something someone else has done and not do exactly what he did and used. Alexey had 2 different fans, pezo and he used a car battery not some big ass mega KW machine. you guys are making a mountain out of a mole hill. Make one with the same parts and set up like Alexey did. I have his parts list with everything he used with links straight to where to buy everything. it came from one of his kits. you will never get that thing up in the air and if you do how are you going to run all them fancy machines in a field? get back to the basics like Alexey was using.
Have you tried building one yourself? I'm interested in getting one of Alexey's kits with a part list. Do you have a website?
The only thing I see is someone delusional belief that he thinks he knows what he's doing.
very good experiment that shows no weight loss. No. 2 this is not how graviflyer works in Alix's design. No. 3 you must hire a monkey from a zoo and let him work in your lab. Something will happen. One thing for sure is remarkable is the replica of graviflyer but it did not work.
everything is "optional" in this trash experiment hahahahahahahahhahahah im dying