Conservative Student SCHOOLS University Professor and students the 2nd amendment
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 06. 2024
- Conservative Student SCHOOLS University Professor and students on the 2nd amendment
full 1 hour video live stream: • Soc 119 Live Stream - ...
Timecodes:
00:00 - the intro
00:21 - WHY DO YOU OWN GUNS?
03:37 - My Thoughts
05:12 - WHY DO YOU OWN GUNS? part 2
9:25 - My final thoughts
All clips used in this video are protected by the Fair Use Doctrine within Title 17 of the United States Code.
This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review and news reporting.
Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a "fair use" of copyrighted content. The videos and this CZcams channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a "fair use" of copyrighted content. The videos and this CZcams channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Thank god there is at least one college student left that hasn’t been brainwashed.
their out there just do not fit narrative so you wont see them
Well she thinks trump is pro 2A automatically disqualified.
There are more like her than there are woke college students. The media want you to believe they are less like her and more with the woke mindset. It's just like the alphabet mafia when you watch these videos you would think it is half the country when in reality it's the minority with the loudest voices. That needs to change.
AMEN TO THAT!!!! Also thank heaven there is at least one professor that hasn't been either!
Only problem is... they are going to fire him. Look what they did with JP.
Hahaha guns are outlawed in Colombia yet gun violence is out of control .
Samething in Brazil, my country.
Mexico is one of the most restrictive on guns on earth.
....and so is Mexico.
Yet democrats seem to think criminals will just stop getting guns of law abiding citizens are barred from owning guns. Our constitutional rights are not up for negotiation
They won't tell you just how many "illegal" guns are on the streets in Australia.
All the ban did is create a black market.
You can get anything STILL
if you know the right guy you can get a bazooka or a mini gun
I'd rather have it, and NEVER need it, than to NEED IT, and not have it.
Just like Snow chains - better to have and not need ...
Listened to an interview on NPR today of a teacher who survived the mass shooting in Uvalde. He instructed the students in the classroom to hide under tables when the shots began ringing out. Did the same himself. He got shot twice and his students are dead.
Seemed like a real nice guy. Wonder if he will go get some training.
@@Exxeron-ob3tv Hate to break it to you bud, but that never happened. It's another campaign just like in 2012.
@@lanthanumlanthanium6373 What never happened? The shooting, the interview, the Mt Saint Helens eruption?
Confucius say -"Vagueness is not a virtue."
@@lanthanumlanthanium6373 YEP!
The main point she neglected to bring up, when asked about restrictions on gun ownership, is the fact that criminals ignore ALL laws, including gun control laws, and it’s only law abiding citizens that are realistically kept from acquiring guns, leaving them at the mercy of criminals.
Other than that, this young lady did an incredible job.
Yah I was hoping she'd bring that up too.
I was thinking the same thing. Criminals don’t care about laws.
She failed miserably on the “assault weapons” thing. Otherwise, I agree with your assessment.
Aka minorities
An armed society is a polite society
Censoring and suppressing replies is also impolite.
@@Aard-Vark >> No, that’s why gun ownership should be mandatory!
@@Aard-Vark The southern states, yes. Yankees don't own guns like us in the South.
In many scenarios, an armed society is more peaceful. Polite might be a stretch. However, when muggers and robbers know that there is a chance the random citizen right next to them is carrying a weapon, they would be less likely to threaten that person or another innocent person within their view. The problem with America is people are growing up not learning that actions have consequences, and instead are learning that if you follow the right ideology and say the right words, you can get away with anything that would not be true on the opposite side. People lack introspection and don't know how to put themselves in the other person's shoes. And quite frankly, people have become extremely sociopathic and self-centered. America doesn't have a armed society problem, they have a mental health problem. National crisis levels of that problem.
@@Aard-Vark It ws before the marxist takeover starting in 2008
The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting! It is every American’s right to keep and bear arms! FJB!
It's every human's right. Rights are universal. Natural. By birth.
And responsibility in my view. I don't mean to put down anyone, But those who do not have since lady passed off the hastaff their responsibility to others well lay themselves benefit while simultaneously mocky those who have assumed they're duty.
If Christopher Columbus “discovered” America back in 1492,
how are the people of the Mayflower or any of the 13 United Colonies of New England (now styled as) THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY citizens be the Americans?
Regardless of the Unconstitutional 14th Amendment (Naturalized) citizen process!
By way of the foreign Declaration of Independence of the Europeans forefathers, they freely gave up their Laws, Flag, Nation, Nationality, and Motherland.
Which made them Outlaws; outside of their own law!
Now, your “Lost At See” by way of the Pope’s Decree!
Meaning: Stateless Person.
Any U.S. CITIZENS claiming to an American is Birthright Thief; Genesis Ch 10:6-20; Public Law 97-280.
And 1836 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and the Moroccan Empire, resigned every 50 years; in force today.
Not to be confused with the Kingdom of Morocco that was established in 1956.
It has nothing to do with protecting yourself from criminals either. It's all about protecting yourself against governments and invading forces
@@goofyfoot2001exactly to protect all the rights you have from any govt foreign or domestic
An ARMED person is a citizen. An UNARMED person is a subject. I am not a subject. 2A protects all the other rights we have.
Right....like the US Army or SWAT or even regular police couldn't take out you and your gun within seconds with still vastly superior firepower and training. You're still a subject. And I'm pro-gun to protect ourselves but don't kid yourself that you're some special citizen above all these subjects simply because you have a gun.
1000%
And an armed citizen is also a potential protector. An unarmed citizen is a potential victim.
It is the most scrutinized amendment too. Constantly under attack and we all know why. The first lately is also under attack.
If those two go all of them can go.
A citizen by definition is a subject to the jurisdiction thereof
It's so refreshing to see a professor who isn't a full blown Marxist and is willing to listen to both sides of a discussion with an open mind. Also I'm pleasantly surprised by the audience. The listened intently and didn't stand up and try to cancel the conversation, as is the norm on today's college campuses.
Betcha he’s still quite Marxist in a lot of ways…
Leftists only try to cancel conversations because they know they can’t win the debate. That’s the ONLY reason to shout someone down and prevent others from hearing their viewpoint. If the viewpoint is invalid, then why are they so afraid to debate it? It should be EASY to defeat.
You'd be surprised how many professors are like this if you actually saw what is going on in a lot of schools instead of just listening to what talking heads tell you.
@@matthewdennis1739 you'd be surprised how many are not like this
8:11 You DO NOT OWN AN ASSAULT RIFLE. You own a semi-auto rifle.
Exactly, most don't know AR actually doesn't stand for "assault rifle", it's the abbreviation of the company the Armalite.
@@markb9896 Armalite Rifle was invented and release to the general public in the late 1950s. Its a civilian grade all purpose rifle used in hunting, target shooting and self defense. Its semi auto only and it look style and how it handles inspired the US military to invent the M16 and use it in Vietnam. It is the most popular rifle used in NA and only counts for 2-3% of all violent crime. Of course I know you know this but this info is what I repeat to idiots who thing the "Assault Rifle 15" is some evil mass murdering super weapon when its not. They also don't know the difference between a rifle and assault rifle. SO I usually explain that to and they call me names and so I want people to be not alived. These people are insane.
Assault rifle is a term that the woke/liberals use for fear mongering.
And a fyi... AR means they're built in Arkansas and AK is from Alaska. 🤣🤣
@@marcfilms999Its so funny that those same people argue that rights are being taken away, but support the side of the government that wants to destroy our right to fight that exact same tyrannical government.
You don't know this. She's from PA. She ery much could own a class III
The professor allowed the conversation. Good for him.
Of course he did. The stereotype of the indoctrinating liberal college professor doesn't happen as often as people think.
but he also tried to make her look like a fool in front of her" peers" prior to the debate
@@lpha420 he was joking around and being playful. He didn't call her an idiot or anything.
The professor actually encouraged this talk and chose ,maybe, the brightest student to have it
@@mdmyer
False projection much?
CZcams has millions of hours of video that disprove your bullsh1t statement.
You go Girl! We need more like her willing to stand up for our Constitution in all walks of life.
That is one extremely good professor. He's showing the students how to properly use critical thinking skills. When we are able to reason properly, it becomes more difficult if not impossible to be manipulated by others. Critical thinking skills are essential.
Yes, my goal as an educator is always foremost teaching my students how to think, not what to think.
Major props to that professor. That's what college is supposed to be about.
He's encouraging "thinking.". These instructors are few and far between today.
I was thinking the same thing. I also loved that the other students seemed to at least be into hearing the discussion.
I went back to college in my late 20s and got my BS. I went to an EXTREMELY liberal college and as a Conservative, I gotta say, it was bad. I had ONE openly Conservative professor in 5 semesters before I graduated and he was the only one who actually wanted his students to think critically. All the others had such a liberal agenda, I swear to you, I felt like an undercover spy in a Nazi propaganda school. My last semester I took an Advocacy & Argument class and my group had to debate gun control. Thankfully, we were the final debate and I was the pro-2A advocate. I researched for a month to get it perfect: I crafted my debate specifically to get the entire room engaged & set them up for to trap them in my point. I even researched the points the other side was most likely going to try to use to leverage my plan so by the time they got to it, I had already hit the 3-pointer from mid-court. It was brilliant and by the time I was finished, almost every liberal in that room had this look on their faces like they just discovered they'd been lied to their entire lives. Did I change anybody's opinion? Probably not. But at least I was able to make those kids think critically.
I think the professor is anti-gun, but I do agree that he did a good job allowing both sides to be heard.
Exactly! My sociology professor at USC, who was a liberal, Jewish, NYU educated woman was fantastic. She would bring up big picture issues all the time and make students team up and argue ideas opposite their own, from across the political spectrum. It was really fun and I’d hire a million teachers like her.
There's no such thing as an assault rifle.
It's a political buzzword.
A assault rifle turns in to a a defensive weapon when we are in are retreat
Incorrect. The Military uses them. I.E. M16, M4 etc. They are Select Fire weapons that can shoot semi-auto, like an AR15, or Full-Auto (or 3 round burst) .
Assault WEAPON is the made-up buzzword.
Correct. All weapons, even a stick, are an assault weapon
@@joshuathered1100 this. As a tin foil hat texan comic, everything is an assault weapon... there is absolutely no better reaction than being at work and telling the boss that my coworker extended his assault tape measure at me while his assault pencil was in his other hand so i threw some assault sawdust in his boot.. truly everything is an assault weapon.
@@mstover2809 She said, "I have an assault rifle." I wonder, does she have one of those??
I am a true American Patriot. I grew up in the 1950s and 60s in a working class family in rural Michigan hunting, camping, fishing, trained in firearms, archery, and throwing knives…and reading books! I am a graduate of PENN State, career U.S. Army officer 24 years retired from active duty. I am blessed to be a husband, father, brother, uncle, and have many friends. I am an educator, a global traveler, and an amateur historian. History fully documents every failed civilization with a population that did not and could not defend and protect their freedoms. To wit, present day China and Russia. Adherence to the Constitution and Bill of Rights (obviously to include the 2nd Amendment) is crucial to the future and survival of the United States of America.
You're not a critical thinker, mr. historian. Of course failed states couldn't defend their "freedoms" (I would argue way of life not freedom) otherwise they wouldn't be failed states/overthrown.
@@Redandranger What? That was a really pathetic response to a true patriots definition. Get your free needle and go back to your tent. Zipper it up too.
Yeah, true American patriot. Thanks for your service.
But your generation gave up OUR right to keep at bear arms, first with the 1934 NFA, and then the GCA.
At least us young "non-true American patriots" are taking our rights back.
Thank you and bless you, true American patriot!
@@Redandranger Crack open a few books and research some example histories of Napoleon, Genghis Khan, even the Roman Empire. Another even more credible source is the Holy Bible and/or Tanakh (Hebrew Bible). Those who did not take a stand or defend, if possible ran away - the ancestral fight or flight reaction. Either way, all were left to face their demise. Brings to mind the question, is war a part of human instinct therefore a part of humanity? Greed for power and wealth certainly is. Strongly suggest staying away from movies and gaming and be sure to use your ‘critical thought’ process - Ha!
I'd like to give a shout out to this girl's parents. WELL DONE!!!!
I'm starting to agree with the "My body, My choice" thinking now. It's my body so it's my choice to protect it with firearms. So keep your bans off of my choice!
That's just called "property rights." You own your body, so you own your labor, and the product of your labor. Voluntary trade of your labor and the product of your labor is the basis for all economics.
"My body my choice" is a false claim that a baby that you voluntarily put in your body is your property. A child isn't property, and you can be criminally charged for not properly protecting them.
Agreed
The "My body, my choice" claim for abortion is false since what they wish to kill is another human's body.
PS That argument doesn't make any sense about abortion, either.
@@logangodofcandy ""My body my choice" is a false claim that a baby that you voluntarily put in your body is your property".....that is your opinion, not a fact. Being criminally charged for not properly protecting your child is an irrelevant point because that is a post-birth issue. And just a side note....you could be charged for neglect/abuse, not for improperly protecting. They are not the same.
Guns are like EpiPens. You hope you never need it, but prepared when you do.
good analogy
A lot of people don't get the depth of need. That's why they don't understand semi-auto rifles and carbines. They don't understand that to hit three armed men breaking down your door with a six shot revolver is damn near impossible unless you train constantly and are just naturally cool under pressure.
For normal person who goes to the range every couple months or less, the only gun that's going to work there is something with a large capacity, multiple points of contact so you can keep it steady while you're trembling and have an easier time aiming. That's an AR-15 or a pistol caliber carbine. A high capacity semi-auto handgun is bare bare minimum for home defense. Shotgun is better if you're well trained. Semi-auto rifle or PCC best. You can spaz 10 shots out & still have 20 in the mag once you calm down a bit.
So well said.
Not a good analogy...a great analogy.
@skydave792unfortunately syringes do . Cops never wore glove before and now
Very refreshing conversation. This is what college should be. She represents 99 percent of responsible gun owners. Knew her stuff and stats. Love to see it! Great job.
I have to applaud this professor. Regardless of his stance on the second amendment, he allowed the respectful exchange/discussion without much steering or direction.
As for the student, she’s a reason for hope for the next generation.
When you Outlaw guns only the Outlaws will have them.
This is exactly what happened on my country Venezuela. Criminals don’t follow the law. Is law abiding citizens are at the mercy of armed xriminals
@@chocolantrosa same thing in Brazil.
the truth is that outlaws is going to do what outlaws do even if they dont have gun.
having easier access to gun only increase your risk because outlaw will also be able to obtain them much easier.
@@PeterKong609 Making it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to posses firearms doesn't hinder criminal activity in any way. It only puts good people in more danger.
A college professor who is engaging in an open dialogue about guns. Give him a raise.
maybe not a raise, depending on the pay structure, BUT give him more access to students
He is actually a brilliant professor from the videos I've seen of him. I haven't seen him express his opinions but rather he questions his students as to what THEY think and why it is they have come to that conclusion. In my book, that's exactly what a professor should be doing!
@@patriot9455 He had a crazy amount of students in his class already....That was probably more than three of my lecture hall classes put together, lol!
Yeah, never mind the fact that he belittled a student in front of the rest of the classroom before the conversation....
@@curtisjordan9210 wdym
Props to the professor for not taking sides. That’s not how I thought the conversation was going to go. This type of grounded debate is what this country needs instead of the yelling that I normally see about topics like this.
That took a lot of balls to get up in front of all those people, good on her!
The pro-gun student is spot-on. She was articulate. She was calm. She had very clear answers to each of the questions.
I'm pro-gun but she sounded like a fool
She had very bad statements that fell directly into the anti-gun agenda. Especially to claim she drinks alcohol then shoots guns.
@@Leadfoot19Like a fool? Nope. she may sound like her thoughts are based on her age and experience. Her reasoning, calmness and ability to hold an adult conversation in a rational and respectful way is what we need from everyone these days.
@@benerval7also pro gun, she was wrong a lot and missed on a lot of easy points. good for her standing up for her rights tho
I’m sure she doesn’t own any “assault rifles” since they’ve been banned in 1986 and anyone that has a tax stamp for one is well into the $30k to $50k and up. Semi auto rifle not assault rifle
As an Australian who’s been in the USA for 24 years, I fully support citizen’s 2nd amendment rights, for many reasons.
Look at the Covid lockdowns in Australia. Australia was very close to having concentration camps in 2020-2023. If they all had been armed, there is no chance that those folks get pulled out of their houses and put into camps like they did.
Our Emu's are currently in office 😬
The battle of Athens Tenn. Aug. 1&2 1946. A stolen local election caused a 6-hour gun battle & use of dynamite at a police station, to retrieve stolen ballot boxes & brought justice in 1946 TN & America!! Involved 2-300 local residents & many were veterans of WW 2, against 2-3 dozen cops mayor & police chief in the police station!! A 1992 movie on you tube titled An American Story & 3 books since 1987!!
They are not 2nd amendment rights. They are 2nd amendment PROHIBITIONS on government from interfering with a right that existed before the government. Don't feel bad, most Americans don't understand and don't care either.
The main reason for the 2A is to protect the citizens from government corruption and a tyrannical government.
She needs to say, "If you want to lower crime you don't take guns away from the law abiding, legal gun owning citizens. You want to take the guns from the criminals, not honest law abiding citizens."
And the firearm possession charge is almost always the first dropped in the plea deal. At least where I am.
Got a 10.5 AR in the trunk, a beretta m9 on my hip and a smith and wesson shield in the center console. God bless 🇺🇸
My hat's off to the professor for allowing both sides to talk.
that's the whole point of his class, to allow people to hear all sides and use critical thinking skills to make up your own mind
Finally a true professor!
Yeah, I've seen other videos from that same professor. He's a true liberal. One that encourages debates and critical thinking.
A college in America allowed this debate ? How Anti-Communist this is …. I’m sure he will not be allowed to have open, honest debates anymore in his class, if they still allow him to teach there!
@@richardkrause9296 You'd be surprised if you actually sat in on some college courses. He's not a unicorn.
this girl is a keeper!
If I was in my 20s, I'd take Emily to the range for a date!
How do you know she plays Quidditch?
She’s wife material
@@spetsdod >> Now, THAT’S funny!
you bet your ass
This professor actually did a great job. We need more of these types of people, who can encourage and maintain a civil conversation. As a "debate" moderator, it is extremely notable that I couldn't really detect his attitudes on guns, and gun control. He asked some very good questions, listened carefully to the answers, and let both sets of students talk and ask and converse. And then pointed out a very important question that was missed - thus dispelling at least one very pervasive (and inaccurate) stereotype. If the moderators of the last few national presidential debates could match his professionalism, that would be a win. But they can't resist the biased spin, and I can't bring even an ounce of respect to the table for these journalistic pretenders. Kudos to the professor.
That was refreshing to hear a university professor to have open dialog in his class
Controlling legal guns will never stop criminals from obtaining firearms, always remember that 🤷♀️
Ask the question - who insists that others cannot have a gun? Those who are surrounded with body guards like Obama and Biden.
@@BernhardSchwarz-xs8kp so true. If "We The People" can't have guns then their body guards should immediately give up their guns.
An armed society is a polite society.
By that logic murder shouldn't be illegal, because laws will never stop murders from happening. Stop signs are useless, since people run them anyhow. Essentially you've made a case for no laws at all.
Literally too much or too little of anything can kill. That's why we have laws controlling how most everything is used. Tap water? If you have enough, you have to build a fence around it. Bread? Well, you can makke your own bread at home, but if you start mass producing it there are rules controlling what you can put in there. Electricity? Again, you can shock the shit out of yourself in private, but if your use of electricity endangers others, there are laws governing how it can and can't be used.
You want a special exemption for guns? They're just allowed to be completely out of control, unlike tap water, bread, and everything else we can name?
Everyone has a right to self-defense. End of story. If the tyrants in the government can have guns, so can citizens to protect themselves from tyrants.
She is on point, God bless her and her parents for teaching her
She really wasn’t. I’m super pro 2nd amendment but she says a lot of things that raise concern. Mentioning drinking and shooting guns as a “fun time” is horrifyingly irresponsible, labeling AR-15s as “assault rifles”, that pistols are more for self defense than any other type of gun, not knowing gun laws, just to name a few.
He was so respectful and gave her a platform whether or not he agreed with her position.
I like how she closed that answer with "protect myself from government" , cause that is the core of the 2nd amendment , for the People to defend themselves from a tyranny should one arise, and to keep one from arising
If a criminal breaks into your home, they won't respond to "Go away, pretty please and leave me alone"
If they break into my house, they definitely won’t walk away!
No but their response to a load of 00buck will get their attention..
sounds like a fly over state person part of the great unwashed........you remember where food comes from
"If someone breaks into your house and you don't have a gun, how are you going to shoot them?" - Dale Gribble, thank you!!!
One of the best quotes I ever read. “The 2nd Amendment Does Not give me the right to bear arms. The 2nd Amendment prevents the government from infringing on my God given right to bear arms!”
Which god is it? Be so kind and cite, please. 😮
@@hanswurstdoppeleiit’s a born right, read the damn preamble….all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights……no need to cite a god…..it’s whatever you believe in….shitty try at a gotcha moment on your part.
Rights are not given, by anyone or any god. Rights are rights specifically because they are NOT given.
Actually rights are given. As in nature, you have none. You aren't guaranteed anything but death in life. A right is something guaranteed by a higher power, often on moral grounds. God gave you these rights because it IS right. Nature cares nothing for morals. That is why the founders said "that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness..." None are guaranteed by nature, only by a personal God.
Current meaning:
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
right
/rīt/
noun
plural noun: rights
1.
that which is morally correct, just, or honorable.
"she doesn't understand the difference between right and wrong"
Similar:
2.
a moral or legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way.
"she had every right to be angry"
verb
3rd person present: rights
restore to a normal or upright position.
@@zackiebullock3614 None of those things define the term "right" as in your right to self preservation. 1. this is a synonym for correct. 2. this is a statement of position; the validity of a position or action. 3. physical manipulation.
If a right is something guaranteed by a higher power, it can be taken away by a higher power, and thus it is not a right, it is a privilege. Your statement about moral grounds is an appeal to authority, and assuming that a god is what is moral and thus the authority for the right. The founders said "endowed by their Creator" but they did not say god. No where in the US Constitution does it say god.
Claiming that a god gave you your rights because they are right is circular. Is the right valid because a god said it is valid? Then it is not a right, it is a privilege. If a god says that the right is valid because it is already valid, then a god is not required. You have the right to believe in a god if you so choose. You also have the right to believe that your rights are derived from some other authority. My rights are inherent and not dependent on someone else to approve them.
Unalienable means cannot be taken away. If your rights are granted by an external agent, they can be taken away. This contradicts the definition.
I wish my college experience would have been like this, where the professor is teaching critical thinking skills instead of preaching dogma. They’re supposed to teach you how to think as opposed to what to think.
Agree with her 100 💯
Gen X Grammy here. My father was a Marine and Police Officer. I've NEVER lived in a house without a GUN, NEVER WILL. I sleep with one under my pillow.
princess and the PP7
Oh my goodness grandma, what a big pillow you have.
@@robertwormley4294 Wait until grandkid finds the gun under the pillow.
@@Redandranger it was a joke. 🤣 This isn't. ➡️ Then get them some of their own. They deserve to be able to protect themselves as well. Plus it's a great sport. It's kinda amazing how when having instruction even a kid can learn. I can't imagine sleeping without something real close. Some reason most people don't hear about defensive use?
Gen X Marine her. There is literally not a room in my house without a loaded firearm. So I’m with you.
As far as children shouting themselves as one of the people asked here in the comments. If you teach them young they respect them. My children had their own cricket from the age of 6. It was in the safe but it was theirs. They shot pop bottles full of water with their little 22’s and they saw the damage it did. They were smart enough to understand.
This woman is so perfect for a college class. She is young, attractive well spoken knowledgeable and most of all passionate about her rights.
Pervy
@@zzzwy777Gotta be attractive. Otherwise, what's the point of home defense?
@@Noconstitutionfordemocrats1 A zero post. Nothing about the history of gun laws, and genocide and democide. Nothing about FDR refusing to save any Jews and starving Americans, and punishing farmers who did not help him starve people. FDR was the first to go after white Americans' guns. Hitler took the Jews' guns. When told about the German deathcamps, FDR screamed he was sick of the crying of the Jew babies. All in history books and told to my class by World War two vet teachers. FDR starved more Jews to death than America's 120 million gun owners ever will. FDR also starved Americans.
What does being attractive have to do with being fit for a college class?
@@zachattack_the_imperialist6065 Glad you asked, since it is important for psychology we should delve into it. First, the labeling theory (All gun supporters are fat country slobs and uneducated or loner military nerds, that's the stereotypes that need countered.) Two, if it didn't matter at all then the opposite would be true too, that a highly unattractive person wouldn't get noted on their looks. So a man scratching his rear, spitting tobacco, cussing, with infections on his face would be fine. Except, in this experiment he would not be. You'd note it. The third topic I will address is the confirmation bias. Many attractive women are dissuaded by the fact that few of their demographic support any conservative belief, and that's damaging.
So yeah, there are 100 legitimate reasons to note her beauty. All these social justice losers like zzzwy777 are just man shamers and pathetic.
This professor has my respect. Every video I've seen on him demonstrates what we truly need in higher education.
That woman is a blessing. We need more women like her.
I have a friend who was a dentist in the DC jail . He asked a burglar,what would keep you from breaking into my house ,and his reply was if I know you have a gun and might be home ,I ain’t going in.
I have always said, let's pass a law that gives the controllers what they want. Then we amend a part that makes the bill only apply to them in a public register along with their home address and picture if they have advocated for the gun control or been affiliated like been part of a party that advocates for it in maybe the last 5 years. See how well they react to that, if it adds protection to society, they should have more of that protection first.
The battle of Athens Tenn. Aug. 1&2 1946. A stolen local election caused a 6-hour gun battle & then a use of dynamite at a police station, to retrieve stolen ballot boxes & brought justice in 1946 America!!
A nra sticker is probably more effective than an adt sticker.
@@AverageJoe-12 Yeah, that's fundamentally unconstitutional and isn't how laws work, but interesting idea.
This professor is why I am proud to be a PSU alum. In my four years there (PSU '78) I never ran into a professor who had his students thinking about issues rather than pushing a liberal agenda. And props to the student. Very difficult to stand in front of a large group and defend your ideas. We need more young Americans like her.
Not a single student is taking notes. They're not learning anything. They're in a Oprah studio.
This professor is excellent. He wasn't schooled by anyone. He's great at delivering facts and challenging students misconceptions and misinformation. Independent thinker and tries to generate more informed, critical thinkers.
I see a bright future for this young, confident, and charismatic student as a news anchor!
My favorite current anti-gun comeback to home protections is "So you've decided that your stuff is more important than their life." Because the answer to that question is "No, but they decided my stuff was worth more than their life and I've decided my life is more important to me than theirs, so the math checks out."
My response would be, "Yes. I worked hard for my stuff so my life is wrapped up in the stuff I own, and they are taking my life from me. My life involved with that stuff is obviously far more valuable than their entire life has ever been."
I would say if you read the NO TRESSPASSING sign outside and still chose to tresspass, then you have consented to what happens next.
I'm using this
@@Noconstitutionfordemocrats1 Far Cry 2 had very explicit signs around every encampment:
"Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again." 90's games still had some balls.
@@tapiolautavaara9532 90s? Far Cry 2 came out in the 2000s, like 2008 or something like that.
You can tell this girls Father is in her life .
First thing that came to my mind
Which of her attributes led you to think that?
@@alleynejoelle Everything
@alleynejoelle the way she articulates words and can form full sentences
@@kalebball5144 But is there a trait that shows her father is in her life? As a woman whose father was barely in her life who relates to this woman, here I am forming full sentences. So I'm trying to understand your observation of which traits she has that indicate her father is present.
I wish more colleges would have a conversation like this in classes
What an intelligent young lady! Very knowledgeable and well spoken.
"An ARMED society is a POLITE society." - Robert Heinlein
If that were true the US wouldn't have one of the highest rates of gun related deaths in the world dude. And the most school shootings period.
No mate "an armed and dumb society is an American society!"
i made the same comment, its true
@@mikatu by your comment you aren't an American, we dont care what you think. most likely british or australian by the use of mate. stay out, if you dont like it
@mikatu ever read the quote by Thomas A Watson, "an armed man was a citizen, an unarmed man was a subject." Which one are you, citizen or subject?
The initial design of the American citizen was to be completely independent. To grow your food and use your land to produce the necessities of life. Not to sit on you thumbs and wait for a free handout.
Independence means that YOU are the provider of your own safety, the protector of yourself and your family. Not the government and not the police.
The purpose of government is clearly outlined in the constitution to provide for the common good and protect the borders AND to protect our individual constitutional rights.
Unfortunately our government gradually became corrupt and became about money rather than meeting the needs of its citizens. The founders would be disgusted with what has happened to this country.
Yes!
The purpose of industrial society is so that 80% of people aren't stuck farming.
Good video. Liberals generally don't understand that disagreements are ok. This prof may not agree with firearm ownership, but he allowed questions to start good conversation. Nice job.
Some don't, but conservatives aren't always guiltless either. I don't find it's useful to stereotype based on political ideology.
Having an open mind and critical thinking are skills that need to be taught, they aren't usually inherent and that applies equally regardless of political leaning.
Congratulations to the students in this class. They have an excellent professor.
thiose who dont want the guns surround themselves with walls of people with guns.
It's ironic you say that, since I'm terrified of the dufus next door constantly cleaning his AR just on the other side of these paper thin walls from my family. Surrounded by walls of guns is right, but it's not the comfort it might be in theory.
@@rbarrett111👈Always terrified 🤣
@@rbarrett111those walls must be thin if you can see him cleaning his gun. Have you ever talked to him, express your concerns? I wouldn't expect him to give up his rights, but talking to him might ease your fears. If he's actually crazy then your concerns might be valid, but hopefully he's safe and so are you
@rbarrett111 you sound like a peeping tom, he probably is doing that to keep you away from him.
Judging by what you have let everyone know, I don't blame him.
I would hate to live next door to some lunatic constantly looking in my backyard and my windows.
He should actually report you.
Celebrity libs love their gate guards and armed security.
I've been shooting guns since I was 13 and now I'm 44. Gun training and responsible starts at a young age. Look we teach our kids at a young to learn how to the cross the road or watch for strangers why won't it be any different with guns. It's all about the training just like with this young lady.
Same here . All of our kids are avid hunters and that builds character and it allows them to live in the real world . Not a phone screen
EXACTLY
folks need big daddy government to TAX/THEFT them %100 these days
There weren't many school shootings when gun safety was taught in schools and there were gun clubs in schools
What do you need weapons for? This is the kind of thing that no one but people from the US understands.
Criminals or soldiers need weapons. Nobody else. And if criminals can't get their hands on weapons, the country will be much more safer. See the whole world except the USA, Honduras and Haiti
Heck, at 16 we turn kids loose with cars which are a lot of responsibility, much more than arms in many ways. It's easier to be safe with a arms with little experience, driving a car is much more complex. And we don't limit the kids to subcompact cars, a kid can drive a 6,000 pound SUV if he and/or his family has the means to purchase one. And at 18 a person can drive a big rig that weighs 80,000 pounds in state and and 21 drive that truck interstate. Think about that, but the idea of arms in the hands of the same person sends people into a fit in so many cases.
This professor is awesome. We need more debates like that so people can stop thinking that "All X are Y" and engage with them in a factual way.
This was a respectful, open discussion.
Good on the professor for promoting the discussion. This is what academia should be.
Guns are either very difficult to get or totally outlawed in major Democrat cities but that is exactly where most gun violence occurs.
Bingo! Like criminals give a damn about gun laws. The universities are turning out brainwashed sheep.
I read that if we would remove the top 6 or 8 cities with the most strict firearms laws, all those cities being deocrat controlled, we would be on the very bottom end of what anti gunners call "gun violence "in the world.
@@DrH-rc7yp 60% of our gun deaths are suicides and the vast majority of the rest are gang violence and happen in the ghettos.
If you live anywhere decent, gun violence if fairly rare.
Also, millions of lives are saved each year with guns. So removing our guns would literally result in millions more than the relatively few deaths today
We must be able to protect ourselves against BIG BROTHER or RUN-A-WAY Government.
That's the democrats agenda . . . only " Outlaws " will have guns . What was the absurd accusations coming from Wacko Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot's
administrations council - commission . Right -Wing undercover agencies' were leaving cars to be stolen that were full of guns to arm gangs in
Chicago that's why Chicago averages over 35 shootings per week. The Democrat party is full of Lunatics that are destroying America with their BS
agendas . . . Period !
Refreshing to see a level minded professor.
I love this professor and he is how professors should be rather than indoctrinating kids to one side or the other. Let critical thinking and reason prevail in healthy debate so each person can judge and decide for themselves without ridicule or punishment.
That said, the student didn't school anyone in the second amendment nor what it even brought up what the amendment was for. The 2nd amendment was for protection against a tyrannical government, NOT for self defense (though that is a great byproduct as well). The founding fathers knew first hand what a tyrannical government was capable of and wished to protect the people from being subject to the same and saw that rights were needed to be able to protect against that and fight back if the government became an oppression of their rights and liberties. I love the 2nd amendment!
He may be liberal, but honestly, he is a great professor for allowing open discussion.
That’s how liberals used to be.
He's a classical liberal.
Commie
As a Canadian I agree 100% with the 2nd amendment. Why is it only the criminals get to have guns?
That's why they're criminals. They don't give a damn about what's legal.
Agreed
As a fellow Canadian i couldn't agree more.
Because that's the way democrats want it in the US
What does agree 100% mean? Completely unregulated? Why would only criminals have guns? No one is trying to banish all guns. It’s not even remotely possible at this point.
Well regulated. Not kinda regulated. Not heavily regulated. Well…. Regulated.
It’s easier for criminals to own/acquire a gun , than a law abiding citizen. Criminals don’t need to go through background check. Law abiding citizen is a must.
I am a DAV wia in VietNam 1969. the 2nd amendment is of course one of the things I fought for. Our right to have a gun if we choose. I do not carry or hunt but do have a few guns in my house and I do support maintaining our rights as American citizens.
James Madison put that 2nd amendment in the Bill of Rights to defend all other other rights--2A is not for only hunting or self defense: it's to dissolve the current government when it becomes the tyrant and oppressor.
But how does that work when the government has bigger guns? And why not simply vote them out?
better than rocks and sticks.........you ASSUME the govt has bigger guns......basements...barns....caves....backyards ......home made guns ....tanks.....drones....hope we never find out...never ASSUME
@PJRayment Britian had the most powerful army and navy on the planet and yet the colonialists still won against them. Guerilla tactics and attrition has worked in the favor of the underdog numerous times throughout history. The strength of the US military is not justification to abandon the right of self-preservation through the ownership of firearms.
@@PJRayment You may want to look at Afghans. They have multiple empires, including the US, occupy them over the years and the Taliban is still in power there. Power isn't the only way to fight a war.
@@PJRayment Yeah, vote them out. How'd that work out in 2020? 81 million "votes," my rear. All the states shut down simultaneously -- even though they were in, I think, FIVE different time zones.
Hats off to this professor to have open conversations like this. We absolutely need these types of conversations in our school systems
What about belittling her in front of her classmates at the beginning?
@@curtisjordan9210 He didn't
@@curtisjordan9210 He was just pointing out he bona fides. She wasn't just the closest to the argument or most right in the class or something but advocated for it openly. Calm down. It would be like asking someone that is an alphabet and they had pink hair and rainbows over everything. Like "Oh, you are passionate and will represent"
@@curtisjordan9210 He wasn't, quit being so sensitive.
Can you imagine how many of the countries that were taken over by socialism and communism what would have happened if guns weren’t banned and confiscated before being taken over!
Fidel Castro, came to power on Jan. 01-1959 in Cuba!! On Jan 02-1959, he started gun confiscation in Cuba & in an early speech to the Cuban people was "why do you need guns"?? Then he seized everything from the Cuban people & this caused a mass exodus migrating to America!!
Thank god for this professor for not pushing an agenda!!!!! Let them talk, think and figure it our for themselves!!
he said in columbia no one has guns...lol thats a hoot
Well,... no one LEGALLY owns guns in Columbia.
He's the biggest idiot I have seen
Haha except the cartels
The criminals do
Colombia* he wasn’t talking about Columbia, SC.
Best comment ive heard, was when feminists said .. if you dont own a womb, you have no right to have an opinion on abortion. Then gun owner said, if you dont own a gun you shouldnt be allowed an opinion on gun ownership. Rather have one and not need it than need one and not have it.
You know your position kind of sort of makes child support extortion.
But there is a tad bit of difference you are comparing apples to puppies.
There is a second amendment.
But seeing as that there was not a mainstream abortions when the Constitution and among the religious population (98% of the populace at the time) it would be very presumable that abortions would not have been looked at kindly in the late 1700s, those people would most certainly considered it murder and very much immoral.
@joeyl.rowland4153 the father probably would have had the right of revenge against mother for infanticide.
And that moment when they slip up and say that guns end lives and abortion don’t 🤣🤣
@@bradyharvey1023 and guns kill less kids , even if illegally obtained, unlicensed and in the hands of illegal immigrants with cartel connections that drug and sex slave kids, are on benefits vote, and live higher than a taxpayer trying to support their family legally. By family I mean traditional blood related family, not gangster families.
Open dialogue....defuses so many issues. If every person could watch this and make a decision, no matter which way they go, it's immensely healthier than "guns are bad, amen". One sided rhetoric only divides...and that's just what they want right now
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them." Richard Henry Lee was A founding father from Virginia.
Another thing to point out is when your country is under attack, you will be armed and ready to defend. Just look at how much money/artillery we sent over to Ukraine to help their citizens defend.
This is a fair point, it's unfortunate the day-to-day cost we pay for such readiness. It feels like there could be a balance between having a protected populous and children being killed in schools. . . I have NO CLUE where that line is, however.
Wake up dude.
@@mikebaldI see what you mean, but in reality, there will NEVER not be evil people who seek to do evil things to others. The deterrent is not laws, rather a victim who is not defenseless.
Schools in the US are, by and large ‘gun free zones’ which only (just like locks on your door) keep honest people honest. If you are a person who is determined to bring harm to others, you will seek out soft targets that you know are defenseless.
Statistically speaking, in the US, CCW permit holders have and do commit far fewer crimes than even police. You don’t ever need to fear the law abiding citizen who carries to protect themselves, their family and others, but you do need to fear the unhinged who wants nothing more than to bring pain and suffering to others.
If we are unable to fix the problem with people wanting to hurt others, we should be emboldened to protect ourselves by any means necessary.
For when seconds count, the police are minutes away. Never rely on the government to protect you, for they do not have your life nor your best interests at heart.
@@Brian-dh9lpwake up? Do you know what Japanese military officials said about the US during WW2 in regards to invading? They dared not because they knew the populace was armed. You say what you do now because you have likely grown up in a time when there is peace and no imminent foreign threats, unlike our predecessors who lived under threat of Communist takeover, should we lose the fight.
Learn history.
@@mikebald That number is incredibly small. Besides, those schools are government run... the same government that's allegedly going to protect you if you can't protect yourself and you see how well they do with that.
I’m loving how uncomfortable most of the class is during this while actually listening and not screaming her down. Then you catch a few fully engaged and interested. This, ladies and gentlemen, is what university should look like.
ONLY and BIGGEST MISTAKE the young lady made was the part about drinking beer and shooting live ammo!
On my range (yes I have a private range on 20 acres) if you are or have been drinking YOU WILL NOT TOUCH A FIREARM!
@@trinity0844 Fair enough. Definitely an unnecessarily risky combo.
This professor has definitely been fired from multiple places before landing here.
I was sad to see how many were uncomfortable. They understand what country they live in, right? I feel much safer around people with guns than not.
@@Nosferata138 oh, I agree with you that it is unfortunate how many people vilify those that don’t agree with their perspective. But like I said, the fact that no one is shouting her down is at least more positive than the norm we’ve become accustomed to seeing.
It allows women to defend themselves more equal to a man.
If she owns an assault rifle she has an FFL (federal firearms license) and pays a significant fee because assault rifles can fire fully automatically as opposed to one round downrange with each squeeze of the trigger. Neither AR-15 nor SKS (civilian version of AK-47) can do that.
Truth but, most people consider every gun (long-short- military style) as assault rifle.
I live-in an open carry state. I own a gun. Most people i know own guns. When people know you could be packing, they tend to leave you alone.
My friend Brandon was driving and keeps his gun on him at all times. He pulled up at a stop sign and some giy and his friend tried to car jack his car. He just pulled his gun and said "Wrong car buddy". They ran.
It confuses me how poeple can ask a question with such an obvious answer. Guns help protect you from other people.
If only that were the only thing they were used for, and not mass shootings, school shootings, domestic violence, and suicide.
@@chessenthusiast Most domestica violence deaths are caused by HANDS............. You think all hands should be removed? Hands, knives, bats anything can be a weapon . The problem isn't the tool it's the HUMAN HEART. You don't have a cure for that in all your idealic BS.
@@chessenthusiast and yet people will use machetes and other weapons for that as well. It's almost as if someone is motivated to do that stuff, they will. You can also get all the materials to make a boom boom and people use that for those as well.
@@chessenthusiast and the mass shootings mostly occur in "GUN FREE ZONES".
I live in a constitutional carry state and we hardly ever have any shootings in the area I live in. Actually I can't even recall a single shooting that has happened around here at least not in the last 15 years since I've been here. And you have 16-year-olds that drive to school with rifles in their truck because it's a hunting area and they learn young how to use their guns.
Love her last words " ...people, animals, 'Government' "
You know I'm also a proponent of the right to self-defense. If the US ever allowed me into the country (legally), I would be a die hard 1st and 2nd Amendment guy. But I've always had this question; people say they need guns to protect themselves from the Govt, but in this day and age wouldn't you always lose that fight? I guess what I'm really asking is HOW would one protect themselves from the government? What would it entail? I understand forming a militia starting a revolution against a tyrannical state but even then, you'd be outgunned and outmatched because you'd be in the minority while the Govt. has nukes, drones and what have you.
That is what people thought prior to the American Revolution, but we know how that went.
Sure they have nuclear weapons but what would they gain from nuking their own people and land?
What would a tyranical government gain from killing their people? Nothing, because they need those people. What would the people gain by killing a tyrannical government? Everything, including freedom.
You don't need fighter jets, nuclear bombs, or military fatigues to fight against a tyrannical government.
Also, remember that the vietcong didn't have the weapons and technology we did, the Taliban and Al Qaeda didn't have tanks or helicopters, and the American revolutionnaries didn't have warships..
Guerilla warfare is very effective even against those technologically superior. Read about various wars through history and you would see what you're saying means nothing in the grand scheme of things.
@@TurretSyndromethat’s what the Brit’s thought
That is literally why we are a country.
@@TurretSyndromeI'm glad you asked. So, if we have no guns, a tyrant could just send a squad car to your house and take you to jail. If we have guns, the tyrant will have to be careful. Is he willing to kill us? How many of us? What level of Aggression is the tyrant willing to command against his people?
It's not that we are planning to win a battle, it's that we hope to never need to do battle.
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.” “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”……
Thomas Jefferson
I have to commend the professor for not only being impartial, but for keeping a topic, known for generating heated exchanges, fun and lighthearted.
Yes, I was impressed with that as well.
@@christophervalery6795 Sad that it has become so impressive to do what they claim they have always done.
@AverageJoe-12 I agree. Unfortunately, we all know that this isn't typical behavior when it comes to teaching.
Good for him for actually having a conversation. This is what America needs.
Glad she wasn't afraid to step up and have the discussion. Glad the professor was willing to allow and participate in the discussion. The only issue I have is that she shouldn't be mixing alcohol and firearms.
I fired a handgun for the first time at the age of 5 with my father behind me assisting me. I received my first rifle for Christmas at the age of 10. My brother and I use to get ammo in our stockings growing up in the state of KS. No big deal at all.
I have to say I'm impressed that the prof. didn't have an agenda. He was light hearted and not the angry, leftist types that I encountered when I attended UC Berkeley, where I was a rhetoric major. The worst grade I got in my major was a B- in Rhetoric of the Bible. I was the only student that made any orthodox biblical arguments and was extremely well versed in scripture.
In Advanced Argumentation, my leftist, liberal lesbian professor said she was going to give me a D after I argued against abortion. I told her if she gave me a D I would file a complaint with the campus ombudsperson, so she gave me a C-. Frankly I deserved an easy A as I was well educated on the subject and was a member of Operation Rescue.
The best grade I received was in Rhetoric of Poetry. In that class I pretty much kept my mouth shut so that the professor wouldn't know I was (and still am) a constitutional conservative. Our entire grade was based on one paper. Mine was 40 pages long and was titled: "The exploitation of women in 17th century poetry. I got an A- in the class.
Emily is a tribute to why America is the greatest country in the world.
She left out a very, very, important point about the NRA, they are all about safety first! I'm 81 and my Uncle Earl was a NRA instructor in the early 50's. He taught me many safety tips when I was a teenager growing up in Central N.Y. The early NRA taught Yankee Union soldiers about firearms during the American Civil War.
The AR in AR-15 stands for Armalite Gun Company, not assault rifle. It founded AR-15's in the mid-fifties.
Who should own a firearm, everybody! The citizens of Switzerland have very low crime rates because just about everyone is"packin'". If you are confronted by some bad guys, police will never get there in time. I'll have my Smith & Wesson M&P Shield out in seconds to defend myself. Young Americans, use some common sense and find alternate news sources besides the main stream brain washing media and your "Liberal" professors. Good luck and stay strong for our beloved America.
USAF Vet
Gary Flagg Buffalo, N.Y.
Right on brother. I am also a veteran. Great point about Switzerland.
I learned ' studying WW2' that Hitler's Generals advised agains the invasion of Switzerland because every citizen not only was required to have a firearm but was required to regularly train to use them, Thus the blitzkrieg went around Switzerland. 😊
So the professor thinks nobody in Columbia, "especially in Bogata", owns guns? He needs to change the brand of weed he's been smoking.
College professors are so arrogant.
🤣🤣
Legally owning a gun in Columbia, versus illegally obtaining is totally different. Professor said "own"...
Ever since 1991, it is illegal to carry AND own in Columbia, without express written permission from Columbian gov't, which is extremely rare for citizens.
I'd like to have your stash, my friend😂.
@@darbllirdod5723 Ownership is not dependent on the legal system protecting that ownership.
@@darbllirdod5723 C'mon man, we all know - or should know - the difference between legally owning vs obtaining! Go to 1:11 and listen again. He didn't say "own", he said "HAS".
As in "because I know, basically nobody in Columbia HAS guns"..."it's impossible to GET a gun in Columbia". If he had put the word "legally" at the end of those sentences, then all is good, but he didn't, and I think it was on purpose, intended to mislead his uneducated audience. In this context, it's an important distinction, it's not just semantics.
You wish you had some of my stash! 😎
We need more professors like him. A professor should strive for objectivity.
Australia likes to show gun crime stats going down after their ban. Even stats such as "car theft" or "home robbery" went down. But that is because they separately measure crimes such as "knife crimes" or "Car-jackings" or "Home invasions". If you plot "Home Robbery" and "Home Invasions" over time, you find that the total number is similar (and slightly more). The change is that criminals that previously waited until homes were empty before robbing them can now do home invasions (robbery when the residents are home) because they are not worried about getting shot. Same with "Car theft" going down in favor of "car jacking" when the car is occupied. Thieves would rather have the driver hand over the keys or have the home owner open the safe. The only reason they did it without the home owners before was because they didn't want to get shot. Of course, there was no "non contact" form of rape, so that is just up across the board, although the rapists often use a knife. When Australia shows you the stats for car theft going down even though they know that car jackings are up to make up for it, they are just lying to you about the effect of gun control.
And now, thee are actually MORE guns in Australia than before the ban.
Phenomenal professor allowing this topic of discuss to happen and proceed forward with meaning
Shoutout to this professor, I’m sure he disagrees with several points but he still allowed the conversation and encouraged the discussion on both sides! That’s rare these days
At least the professor came at the topic with genuine interest and hearing both sides. Too many liberal professors have an agenda to push.
I assume he’s left leaning but only because he’s a college professor. I’ve seen several of his podcasts casts and haven’t seen him making any statements that are solidly leaning either way - I think he does a good job of being impartial (never entirely possible but he does a good job of being fair) he will hold conversations based on reality and stats not how he what’s people to blindly follow. I feel we need more profs like him
I was thinking the same thing. He let all three of them speak and engage in a civil debate. That's what we used to have in this country: civil debates. There are too many people who are so emotionally attached to their beliefs that they won't even acknowledge someone who disagrees. The professor was fair to them but I thought he was trying to single out that young lady and embarrass her. He probably didn't expect her to handle herself as well as she did.
No idea if he is left wing or not, but if you happen to have seen a lot of this professor's videos he pushes back against a lot of left wing narratives. He has all sorts of students that advocate for all sorts of cliche ideas and he forces them to show their work and explain themeselves and most of them fall apart.
You've heard that liberal professors are pushing an agenda and you've probably seen phone recordings of a handful. Do you actually know what % of them are pushing an agenda? Is this a feeling or an assumption of abundance based on a few examples?
When I went to college, I had professors tying themselves in knots to avoid showing any political bias. Out of the dozens of teachers, I only had one that looked and acted like someone that fell out of tantrum that Hillary lost meme. The most common political assertions I saw were in the science departments making fun of young earth creationism.
One day we will get a person that says “well actually we already have to have background checks to buy a firearm so not everyone can own a firearm legally and subsequently we have more gun violence now then before the government infringed on our God given rights to own a firearm and protect ourselves.”
Have completed done a 180 on this issue & the 2nd amendment. Born and raised in Canada, growing up, went shooting with my Dad (he was RCMP) fairly often. In my late 20's, moved overseas and lived in Taiwan, S Korea, Ireland where gun crime was nonexistent. Became scared about living in the States (as my husband is American) and knew we would be settling there for his job. After three years of living here, we both wanted our concealed carry permit so began taking firearms training classes. Still of the opinion that people should need a background check and to have a training course before even purchasing a gun. Realize this means that the gov't may need to subsidize this for people at FPL (federal poverty level). Gov't has paid for crazier things - currently paying for gender affirming "care", and the sterilization, medicalization, and mutilation of minors, so, figure they can pay for a citizens 2nd amendment right.
We're seeing countries around the world now (for example, Sweden) that took away their citizens' rights for self-protection. Girls getting raped and beaten in society. In these countries, guns are being smuggled in by gangs and illegal immigrants. Over time, the countries that celebrated their low gun crimes, only the "bad guys" will have the guns.
This gives me hope. Mad respect for a teacher letting the conversation happen in his class and to the students who were respectful enough to remain silent and listen.
In Canada , the PM has said that you don't have the right to protect yourself in your own home .
Also, I believe Canadas PM Trudumb banned/restricted handguns sales, purchases and transfers.
What wrong with the PM? Then when or where do you have the right to protect yourself?
I bet he's protected in his home. I've noticed that leftist politicians always have a strong security detail. Rules for the peasants, not for the ruling class.
@@MergedElement We don't. Full stop. That's what the police are for. HAH!!!!!
Hopefully y’all wake up and vote differently and get him out.