Magic Hexagon - Numberphile

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 25. 08. 2014
  • Dr James Grime talking Magic Hexagons (and magic squares).
    More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
    Support us on Patreon and get extra stuff: / numberphile
    James Grime: singingbanana.com
    Support us on Patreon: / numberphile
    NUMBERPHILE
    Website: www.numberphile.com/
    Numberphile on Facebook: / numberphile
    Numberphile tweets: / numberphile
    Subscribe: bit.ly/Numberphile_Sub
    Numberphile is supported by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI): bit.ly/MSRINumberphile
    Videos by Brady Haran
    Brady's videos subreddit: / bradyharan
    Brady's latest videos across all channels: www.bradyharanblog.com/
    Sign up for (occasional) emails: eepurl.com/YdjL9
    Numberphile T-Shirts: teespring.com/stores/numberphile
    Other merchandise: store.dftba.com/collections/n...
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 817

  • @superj1e2z6
    @superj1e2z6 Před 8 lety +909

    At least it is not a Parker hexagon

  • @SpeeDim
    @SpeeDim Před 9 lety +542

    I just love James Grime

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  Před 9 lety +89

      SpeeDim so do we!

    • @andrew_cunningham
      @andrew_cunningham Před 9 lety +13

      There's just something about him, isn't there...

    • @uselesssanity
      @uselesssanity Před 8 lety +5

      Andrew Cunningham perhaps its his little professor

    • @gavs928
      @gavs928 Před 8 lety +12

      maybe it's just because he's British and I'm not, but he seems like he'd make a great doctor who

    • @alfredomoreno8516
      @alfredomoreno8516 Před 8 lety +10

      Yes he conveys so much enthusiam

  • @sethgrasse9082
    @sethgrasse9082 Před 6 lety +180

    That size 1 magic hexagon blew my mind

    • @TrimutiusToo
      @TrimutiusToo Před 4 lety +23

      Yeah,not to mention the rigorous proof that it is indeed magical

    • @yusuf-5531
      @yusuf-5531 Před 4 lety +18

      He didn't mention that an n=0 hexagon also works

    • @TrimutiusToo
      @TrimutiusToo Před 4 lety +14

      @@yusuf-5531 diagonals in n=0 hexagon aren't well defined so it is way too hard of a proof for this video

    • @Triantalex
      @Triantalex Před 9 měsíci

      ??

  • @elwynbrooks
    @elwynbrooks Před 9 lety +119

    His enthusiasm makes me so happy :D

  • @Maninawig
    @Maninawig Před 5 lety +29

    8:33 When you're a Maths teacher and your student asks you to prove why 1+1=2

  • @AlanKey86
    @AlanKey86 Před 9 lety +415

    Does anyone have wood?
    I'll give you 2 wheat for 1 wood...

    • @CraftQueenJr
      @CraftQueenJr Před 6 lety +10

      AlanKey86 yep, do you have 1 sheep? I’ll give you two wood.

    • @Maninawig
      @Maninawig Před 5 lety +2

      Awkward for any guy to hear.... Odd glances everywhere

    • @MisterHunterWolf
      @MisterHunterWolf Před 5 lety +12

      *rolls seven*

    • @jacobr7729
      @jacobr7729 Před 5 lety +1

      But I have all the ore....

    • @TrimutiusToo
      @TrimutiusToo Před 4 lety +2

      I have wood for sheep

  • @SimaanFreeloader
    @SimaanFreeloader Před 9 lety +47

    James Grime is so great. I always know it is going to be good when it is a video with him.

  • @wmconorbrown
    @wmconorbrown Před 9 lety +91

    "Let's count that to make sure." Very difficult math I see it is to check the other 1 magic hexagon.

  • @swarm9582
    @swarm9582 Před 9 lety +28

    Thank you for being colorblind friendly in the animation because I had no idea what you were talking about with the shape grouping until that point.

    • @wolfiksk123
      @wolfiksk123 Před 9 lety +1

      What does it look like. You can only see... Gray? Ha?! No? :(

    • @steinardarri
      @steinardarri Před 9 lety +4

      wolfiksk123 It he means that the red and blue ones look too similar

    • @SnakeBiteScares
      @SnakeBiteScares Před 9 lety +11

      steinardarri Not exactly, it depends on what type of colorblindness he has, I myself am colorblind and found it difficult to distinguish the blue and the pink. Colorblindness is where you find it difficult to distinguish between certain colors

  • @8bit_pineapple
    @8bit_pineapple Před 9 lety +276

    James: "What I have here is..." --- Me: "A poorly designed Settlers of Catan Board?"

  • @ragibhasan5745
    @ragibhasan5745 Před 3 lety +3

    1:44
    Its the cutest "why" I have ever heard!

  • @vsauce4678
    @vsauce4678 Před 4 lety +14

    This guy has so much passion for what he loves and it shows in his videos

  • @Azmarith
    @Azmarith Před 9 lety +141

    What's got 6 sides and isn't here any more?
    A hexagone.

    • @Triantalex
      @Triantalex Před 9 měsíci

      ??

    • @Azmarith
      @Azmarith Před 9 měsíci

      @@Triantalex A hexagon has six sides. But it's gone. So it's a hexa-gone.

  • @firstnamelastname-oy7es
    @firstnamelastname-oy7es Před 8 lety +77

    Incredible! It looks like all the other Hexagons have Hexa... _Gone_!!!
    I'm sorry for that.

    • @thisisrtsthree9992
      @thisisrtsthree9992 Před 8 lety +2

      +Bungis Albondigas shame

    • @thepip3599
      @thepip3599 Před 8 lety +2

      Sometimes I really wish there was a facepalm emoji. Just, so, so much.

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 Před 7 lety +2

      that was a parker square. You still get a cookie :3

  • @jacderida
    @jacderida Před 9 lety +94

    Numberphile2 would have been a nice place for the full solution :).

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  Před 9 lety +25

      Chris O'Neil there are some small extras from this video coming to Numberphile2 - but not that solution I'm afraid.

    • @EebstertheGreat
      @EebstertheGreat Před 9 lety +2

      Numberphile
      Is the solution really that tedious?

    • @joaomelo7538
      @joaomelo7538 Před 9 lety +5

      EebstertheGreat Its just solving five variables system, nothing big...

    • @EebstertheGreat
      @EebstertheGreat Před 9 lety +3

      João Melo
      There's a lot more to it than that, though. That just tells you the sum of each color.

    • @joaomelo7538
      @joaomelo7538 Před 9 lety +10

      yes, that's my point, if haven't understood I was being sarcastic. A five equation system takes too much time for a video

  • @DouglasZwick
    @DouglasZwick Před 8 lety +37

    Oh man I laugh out loud at 1:50 every time

    • @BattousaiHBr
      @BattousaiHBr Před 6 lety +7

      i cant even understand what he's saying
      "if you want to edit and cut to xxxxxx" ?

    • @EchoHeo
      @EchoHeo Před 6 lety +6

      BattousaiHBr thats the point

  • @McJaews
    @McJaews Před 9 lety +7

    Thank you Brady:) It's always great hearing Dr Grime talk about math. I did, however, notice a distinct lack of prime numbers in this video, and was wondering if there were any interesting mathematical things going on with geometric shapes that have a prime number of sides. I find it hard to imagine that there isn't.

    • @PC_Simo
      @PC_Simo Před rokem +3

      Well; the regular pentagon has a prime number of sides (5); and its diagonals bisect each other in the golden ratio, which is very much related to the Fibonacci numbers; and the Fibonacci numbers seem to me to contain relatively more primes, than any old random sequence; which, I guess, makes sense, given that the golden ratio is kind of like the most irrational number there is; so, if I expected primes to show up anywhere, it’s definitely in the Fibonacci sequence 🤔.

  • @SaveSoilSaveSoil
    @SaveSoilSaveSoil Před 3 lety +1

    Nice! I never paid attention to these magic n-gons! Thank you for raising my awareness!

  • @burpie3258
    @burpie3258 Před 9 lety +131

    1:52 can't stop laughing

  • @neelmodi5791
    @neelmodi5791 Před 9 lety +29

    Exponentiation of each number in the hexagon leads to a magic multiplicative hexagon!

    • @AuroCords
      @AuroCords Před 8 lety +1

      +Neel Modi please explain 0.0

    • @pokestep
      @pokestep Před 8 lety +6

      +Auro Cords I believe what they meant is that if you had a magic hexagon (or a square, works there too) with any number to the power of numbers in the magic square (or a hexagon) and you multiplied them within rows, you'd get the same number! Observe:
      For the usual 3x3 magic square, with rows of (6,7,2) (1,5,9) (8,3,4), if instead you had numbers like (2^6, 2^7, 2^2) (2^1, 2^5, 2^9) (2^8, 2^3, 2^4), which equals (64, 128, 4) (2, 32, 512) (256, 8, 16) and multiplied them (rows, columns, diagonals), they'd give you the same number! (2^15 or 32 768).
      The reason this works is because of the way exponentiation works - if you multiply numbers, such as a^b and a^c, the result is a^(b+c), you get the sum of the powers! (Observe: 2^2*2^3 = 4*8 = 32 = 2^5.) This works for any base number (i.e. you can have 3^x, 10^x is especially nice because you only add 0s, e^x... it's up to you!).
      Hope that helps and answers your question!

    • @AuroCords
      @AuroCords Před 8 lety +1

      Amazing!
      I had forgotten about that property, I guess the original comment should have said "Exponentiation *to* each number in the hexagon..."
      I didn't quite get the last part of what you said: " (i.e. you can have 3^x, 10^x is especially nice because you only add 0s, e^x... it's up to you!)."
      Thank you =]

    • @pokestep
      @pokestep Před 8 lety +1

      +Auro Cords You're welcome! What I meant by that part is that it doesn't need to be powers of 2 like I showed you, but it can also be powers of 3, powers of 10 (especially nice because then you're only adding 0s to the numbers, i.e. you get (100,1000000000,10000) (10000000,100000,1000) (1000000,10,100000000) I think), it can be powers of e - that is totally up to you! The sum of exponents during multiplication applies to any number. :)

    • @AuroCords
      @AuroCords Před 8 lety +3

      Ah yes, that's what I understood but wasn't sure.
      This is why I love maths, gotta get some practice tho to keep the brain slick. tx again!

  • @General12th
    @General12th Před 8 lety +12

    Brilliant video! Brilliant explanation, brilliant subject, brilliant professor. Simply intelligent.

  • @hiwadwardak2410
    @hiwadwardak2410 Před 8 lety +44

    8:35 to 8:44

  • @daggawagga
    @daggawagga Před 8 lety +107

    10:00 are Grime's birthmarks the vertices and center of an equilateral triangle?

    • @aves8964
      @aves8964 Před 8 lety +26

      Illuminati confirmed.

    • @daggawagga
      @daggawagga Před 8 lety +16

      ***** if it was an equilateral triangle, it would be all of them! (I loved that one video)

    • @NoriMori1992
      @NoriMori1992 Před 8 lety +11

      +Daggawaggaboof It looks like it _is_ an equilateral triangle!

    • @jacecockayne2054
      @jacecockayne2054 Před 6 lety +7

      What an awesome birth mark

    • @mclam168
      @mclam168 Před 4 lety +4

      3 zeros in the time stamp. 3 side in a triangle. Illuminati confirmed.

  • @johnkat4391
    @johnkat4391 Před 9 lety +3

    Numbers that can't be in the same row in a 3x3 magic square:
    1,2
    1,3
    2,3
    7,8
    7,9
    8,9
    7,4
    3,6
    Also, 4 needs to be in a row with 5 or 6. 5 with 4 or 6. 6 with 4 or 5.
    There are probably other numbers that can't be together or have to be together, but this is what I've found so far.

    • @johnkat4391
      @johnkat4391 Před 9 lety +1

      Sorry, let me correct that. (I am on mobile so I can't edit it.)
      A 3x3 magic square where you can only use numbers 1-9 and the answer needs to be 15.

    • @johnkat4391
      @johnkat4391 Před 9 lety +1

      Another correction! You can only use each number once.

  • @LLHLMHfilms
    @LLHLMHfilms Před 8 lety +70

    Now I want to play the settlers of catan

  • @abigailcooling6604
    @abigailcooling6604 Před 2 lety +1

    I'm sure Matt Parker will create another magic hexagon that *almost* works. You've always got to give things a go!

    • @svz5990
      @svz5990 Před 8 měsíci

      You mean a Parker hexagon?

  • @awaiskhan_47
    @awaiskhan_47 Před rokem +1

    Another James Grime classic!

  • @najiali1068
    @najiali1068 Před 9 lety

    I love the way counting the sum of all numbers in one hexagon.
    Very nice video. I like your way of clearing up things.
    Thank you.

  • @Richard_is_cool
    @Richard_is_cool Před 9 lety +22

    Thank you! Also, will there be a Mandelbrot Set continuation? It's been more than a month. :)
    Keep up the good work!

  • @frawding9438
    @frawding9438 Před 6 lety +24

    Any Parker hexagons?

    • @rewrose2838
      @rewrose2838 Před 3 lety +1

      120 of them
      all got rejected at the end in the favour of the correct one 😂

  • @KunamaElgar
    @KunamaElgar Před 9 lety

    While I enjoy numberphile videos they usually go right over my head! I actually understood this video and followed his thinking all the way through so I really liked it.

  • @MKWKezer
    @MKWKezer Před 9 lety +1

    Very nice and not too hard either!
    You should do more videos, I love them, James :)

  • @Ollervo100
    @Ollervo100 Před 9 lety +1

    James you are awesome! Keep up the good work!

  • @jsunny22
    @jsunny22 Před 4 lety +1

    The magic hexagon is in the shape of the flower of life.

  • @jsnadrian
    @jsnadrian Před 9 lety +2

    Having Dr Grime must be such a fun lecturer to have

  • @venweera4516
    @venweera4516 Před 8 lety +15

    @8:33 there is a slight addition error, happens to the best of us

  • @creature_from_Nukualofa
    @creature_from_Nukualofa Před 9 lety +1

    I get the same feeling as reading a chapter by Martin Gardner.
    thanks Brady, thanks James for the wonderful content!
    ND

  • @7777stine
    @7777stine Před 9 lety

    8:22 That Smile!!! LOL! This guy loves numbers clearly

  • @LesMiserables999
    @LesMiserables999 Před 8 lety +8

    You're my magic hexagon James...

  • @gregotox
    @gregotox Před 8 lety +9

    he`s so happy about it! :D

  • @liamogrady5868
    @liamogrady5868 Před 2 lety +2

    "And the diagonals too!"
    Matt Parker: what.

  • @robzwolf
    @robzwolf Před 9 lety +1

    Really good video. Great chromakeying with the blue writing too, and very interesting to watch. Love it! :-)

  • @lejink
    @lejink Před 9 lety +1

    Dr James Grime is my favorite :)

  • @AlbinosaurusR3X
    @AlbinosaurusR3X Před 9 lety

    Love your show, Numberphile.

  • @leonhrad
    @leonhrad Před 9 lety +17

    I want a t-shirt with a magic hexagon on it

  • @YindiOfficial
    @YindiOfficial Před 9 lety

    James' videos are my favorite tbh.

  • @zerid0
    @zerid0 Před 9 lety +112

    Poor empty hexagon, he didn't even get mentioned :'(

    • @ZardoDhieldor
      @ZardoDhieldor Před 9 lety +8

      Yeah! And what about n=-3! :(

    • @louisng114
      @louisng114 Před 9 lety

      Zardo Schneckmag n = -3 would make the denominator 0; better make it n = -2.

    • @ZardoDhieldor
      @ZardoDhieldor Před 9 lety +1

      louisng114
      n=-3 would make a denominator of -5. A denominator of zero never appears.

    • @louisng114
      @louisng114 Před 9 lety +1

      Zardo Schneckmag Oops, I mean "makes the denominator -7."

    • @ZardoDhieldor
      @ZardoDhieldor Před 9 lety +1

      louisng114
      Yeah, whatever! :D I'm used to calculate with 2n+1 more than 2n-1.

  • @natereniger8773
    @natereniger8773 Před 9 lety

    Dr. Grime is so fun to listen to... I wish I could do my whole undergrad over again where he teaches every class.

  • @nonitta
    @nonitta Před 9 lety

    This is Amazing, I find this so interesting! Thank you for teaching me something new!

  • @dominikf.1409
    @dominikf.1409 Před 9 lety +1

    I love the singing banana

  • @Radii_DC
    @Radii_DC Před 8 lety +15

    0:58 NICE! :D

  • @brandonhorvath5881
    @brandonhorvath5881 Před 9 lety

    Thank you for blowing my mind once again.

  • @thermotronica
    @thermotronica Před 9 lety +1

    Beautiful video!

  • @jlolme
    @jlolme Před 9 lety

    I'M CRYING AT BRADY'S EDITING

  • @BiffTech05
    @BiffTech05 Před 5 lety +2

    8:31 The Highlander magic hexagon

  • @moppop275
    @moppop275 Před 3 lety +2

    when he checked the magic hexagon of n=1 I died.

  • @christianavery5518
    @christianavery5518 Před 9 lety

    Reminds me of a game we used to play in maths class called 'Nubble'. The maths of the game has nothing in common with the video but there were numbers in hexagons which formed a large hexagon.

  • @DreamFreeFPV
    @DreamFreeFPV Před 9 lety +21

    Not going to lie. My interest in watching this was to get better at settlers @numberphile

  • @quaironnailo
    @quaironnailo Před 8 lety +2

    This is entirely based on the fact that it has to use every single number from one to the number of hexagons (19 in this case), which is not a condition for a magic shape.

  • @TheConnor12500
    @TheConnor12500 Před 9 lety +7

    Could you perhaps do a video on slide puzzles? I've been doing lots recently and can never do a scrambled 4x4 in less than around 60 moves, is there a number of moves all can be completed in like Gods Number, and how about for a nxn puzzle? Love the videos!

  • @kattay11
    @kattay11 Před 9 lety

    This went whoosh, over my head. But I love his dimple

  • @TimmahDee
    @TimmahDee Před 9 lety +70

    Not sure if editing humor at 1:52... or just mistake during editing...

    • @choco_jack7016
      @choco_jack7016 Před 6 lety +5

      I think it says "sort of edit and cut to hoint (idk) with theee so..."

  • @thrillscience
    @thrillscience Před 9 lety +15

    Sorry, James! That's not the only magic hexagon. I have one just like it here!

  • @Ahov
    @Ahov Před 9 lety

    Wow, grats on 1m subs!

  • @MrCyanGaming
    @MrCyanGaming Před 7 lety +9

    In the video you never mentioned that the Magic Hexagon must be made of consecutive numbers. Since you can just multiply all of the Numbers in the Hexagon shown in this video by 2 and get a new Hexagon that Works. (MAGIC NUMBER: 76)
    If you want a Magic Hexagon in it's simplest form, you can take the Hexagon shown in the video and Add 8 to the Pink, then Add 16 to the Blue and Center. This will give you a new Magic Hexagon in it's simplest form. (MAGIC NUMBER: 70)

    • @migorpresents8991
      @migorpresents8991 Před 11 měsíci +1

      Thanks for the explanation. I couldn't figure out what was going on at 2:34

    • @yatra6110
      @yatra6110 Před 8 měsíci

      Magic number 76 works as well as other multiples of 38 . The array of numbers for M 76 are consecutive even numbers! These magic hexagon 1-19 numbers x3 =114 should work but they r not consecutive numbers..
      and for 70, I tried but it’s not working for all rows..

    • @MrCyanGaming
      @MrCyanGaming Před 8 měsíci +1

      @@yatra6110 Add 16 to the center instead of 8, that's mb

  • @CodyBenson13
    @CodyBenson13 Před 9 lety +1

    Very interesting. I have to say though, I only really watch when James is in the videos.

  • @dr-baboul3077
    @dr-baboul3077 Před 9 lety

    Good work !!

  • @xvipes
    @xvipes Před 9 lety

    Welcome back James

  • @TheSleepingAsian
    @TheSleepingAsian Před 9 lety +3

    Kept seeing the "Settlers of Katan" board when I saw the Hexagons, haha.

  • @MartinMllerSkarbiniksPedersen

    Fantastic. Thanks a lot.

  • @ultravidz
    @ultravidz Před 9 lety

    Great one!

  • @acediamond5399
    @acediamond5399 Před 9 lety

    Amazing! Great video. Seems a bit miraculous that even the 3-layer hexagon works.

    • @leonardomona9376
      @leonardomona9376 Před 8 lety +1

      +Ace Diamond theres nothing miraculous about it, its just a coincidence, things would be different if the numbers used is base 6 not base 10

    • @acediamond5399
      @acediamond5399 Před 8 lety

      Well yeah, that's kinda what I meant, not a literal miracle, lol.

    • @acediamond5399
      @acediamond5399 Před 8 lety

      But, besides the point, this concept is base-independent.

  • @Tobis0x00
    @Tobis0x00 Před 9 lety

    Dr James Grime said "There can be only one..." He's my new hero. The Highlander of Hexagons!

  • @brankodimitrijevic382
    @brankodimitrijevic382 Před 9 lety

    Great videos watching from Serbia!

  • @TheDiggster13
    @TheDiggster13 Před 9 lety

    This is great! I really love proofs like this. Has it been used for anything practical yet or is it still just in the realm of recreational mathematics?

  • @BLiZIHGUH
    @BLiZIHGUH Před 9 lety +1

    5:24 and then James Grime sets the hexagons on fire

  • @boilpoil
    @boilpoil Před 9 lety +57

    I like how Numberphile finally touched on Magic Squares :)
    Also, every comment (except Brady's) below me has nothing to do with the video. Lol.

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  Před 9 lety +30

      boilpoil we've done magic squares before!!!

    • @boilpoil
      @boilpoil Před 9 lety +8

      Numberphile Really? I only subscribed a few months ago, at the video about -1/12 xD

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  Před 9 lety +28

      boilpoil better get into the back catalog!!!!

    • @Kram1032
      @Kram1032 Před 9 lety +29

      boilpoil boy got you some work ahead of you

    • @grandexandi
      @grandexandi Před 9 lety +1

      There already is another video about magic squares.

  • @Zack0ry
    @Zack0ry Před 9 lety

    its cool how you just added his handwriting instead of a preset font :)

  • @hawaianico
    @hawaianico Před 6 lety

    Great video! Thanx, im now thinking aboyt it in dozenal would be the formula nicer

  • @maxor669
    @maxor669 Před 5 lety +2

    No one tell Matt this is the only one and let him "have a go at it" XD

  • @constantinefreeman1637

    Awesome video! Will there be anything on Klein bottles?

  • @skhalid360
    @skhalid360 Před 9 lety

    For a moment, when James started adding the numbers 1 + 2 + ... + nn, I was lost. But then I remembered that a magic square must be made of all the numbers up to and including nn.
    Also, are there any other magic hexagons if we remove the constraint that the numbers have to be from the set {1, 2, 3, ..., 3n(n -1) + 1} only? Like, could we use distinct whole numbers not necessarily from that set to fill out the honeycomb, and still get this effect?
    It seems to me that that problem would have a much more involved and non-elementary solution than this one.

  • @aurabozzi228
    @aurabozzi228 Před 7 měsíci +1

    This is a beautiful proof!

  • @rywilk
    @rywilk Před 8 lety +1

    Very cool! I'll have to give this a go in my spare time =p

  • @Nami-x
    @Nami-x Před 9 lety

    Numberphile If I get this right, the definition of a magic hexagon is to use each number once. If you allowed that rule, you could create infinite magic hexagons by simply adding 2 to all outer numbers, 1 to all middle ring numbers and 0 to the central number (in this example they all add up to 44 then (you take 3x the number you added to the outer ring)), however in my workings you do get the number 5 three times.

  • @Mustardear
    @Mustardear Před 9 lety

    Perhaps it would have been a little clearer if the coloured hexagons were turned over during the section from about 9:00, to make it clear that we don't know where all the numbers should be yet. Just a suggestion in case you do a similar video in the future, great work as always!

  • @JoshDan12
    @JoshDan12 Před 9 lety +3

    YES!

  • @willtang2314
    @willtang2314 Před 9 lety +1

    Amazing!

  • @tedchirvasiu
    @tedchirvasiu Před 9 lety

    Awesome!

  • @hezronzimba763
    @hezronzimba763 Před 6 lety

    YOU ARE THE BEST

  • @drorfrid
    @drorfrid Před 8 lety +1

    At the end, I have checked why it is the only magic hexagon, and I didn't understand why Y is even, smallest possible

  • @jimbo-fk4dq
    @jimbo-fk4dq Před 7 lety

    Numberphile should get a show on PBS. Preferably PBS, because it's too smart for cable TV. I'd love watch it.

  • @TheEternalHermit
    @TheEternalHermit Před 9 lety

    Question, you have a 8 1 6 | 3 5 7 | 4 9 2 magic square as mentioned in the video, it would seem to me that if the magic hexagon has to be able to work from any angle with any number of hexagons then why doesn't the magic square have to say add up to the magic number when you take say 1 from the top row middle column and 7 from the middle row right column?

  • @iisnothere
    @iisnothere Před 2 lety

    I do love that this mathematical phenomenon created the entire genre of “hex bingo”

  • @Adamantium9001
    @Adamantium9001 Před 9 lety +7

    What if you remove the requirement that the numbers in the cells have to be 1 through n?

  • @TheAAMoy
    @TheAAMoy Před 9 lety

    FYI, this fucking ROCKS!

  • @dans5606
    @dans5606 Před 7 lety

    Sitting here watching videos about magic squares, and just noticed Matt Parker's "Magic Square Party Trick" for the 34 magic square! Oh, you guys.

  • @TakeWalker
    @TakeWalker Před 9 lety

    That was really fun. :D

  • @karlkastor
    @karlkastor Před 9 lety

    That's great. Magic Squares are to mainstream, so it's good to have this. Very interesting that there's only one possible way to do it.

  • @hornick18
    @hornick18 Před 9 lety

    Lol, when Brady edited. That was hilarious