Newark Airport DC10s & MD11s (2001)
Vložit
- čas přidán 31. 05. 2019
- Back in the days where Continental had a major hub at Newark Airport and was operating a bunch of DC10s and some of the other airlines who operated them as well including Citybird who operated a pair of MD11s on behalf of Sabena. The Newark, La Guardia, JFK Airports 2001-05 are loaded with incredible memories featuring 6 hours of video and more than 150 airlines! You don't want to miss this!
FILM INFO
www.justplanes.com/NYC.html
FILM VIDEO TRAILER
• NEW YORK AIRPORTS JFK ...
When subscribing to our channel make sure to click the bell to be notified when we post new videos. Thank you!
FOLLOW US
JUSTPLANES www.justplanes.com
JUSTPLANES TV www.justplanes.tv
FACEBOOK / justplanes
INSTAGRAM / thisisaviation
#newark #dc10 #md11
It's weird that footage from the 2000's looks like it's from the 80's.
Why though
its because we have become visually accustomed to higher quality content now. but back in 2001 this was HD
This does not look like 80s footage. This looks like high quality 2000-2003 footages huge difference between 80’s or even 90s. I take it you are a child maybe.
That's probably because home video quality didn't improve much from the 80s to the 00's. Wasn't until digital cameras and later cellphones that we saw a huge improvement.
Just the classic.I miss those Tri-Jets.DC-10 and MD-11 flights are among my most loved.So much space and comfy seats and the power of those engines on take off...truly unforgettable
I like seeing these old videos a lot! Very good quality for 18 years ago!
Thanks very much!!
That unmistakable engine roar. I love the DC-10/MD-11, their shape was awesome. I miss flying in those fatboys, my favorite airliners. Great memories, thanks for the video.
Wow, and the twin towers in the background. Great footage
I sure do miss the 90s and early 2000’s. My favorite is the Northwest DC-10 I’ve flown so many and worked so many while I worked for Northwest. I miss flying on them you don’t get much widebody service to the West Coast any longer. The red eyes to Minneapolis in Detroit from LA were especially nice.
Noting the
board flat
straight horizontal wings
Such a departure from where we are now...
True
This video makes me so happy.
Wow, that Sabena MD-11... Definitely a relic.
The DC-10 seen at 4:00 is N303FE, 46 years old and impressively still flies to this day!
really havent seen em in a whiile
I worked on it in Newark a few months ago
What airline does it fly for now? Cargo i imagine, but who?
Sigge Steen still with FedEx
Almost as old as FedEx’s “Joey” N365FE which was retired last March
WOW!! you're on fire, every few moments you're pouring out content...very good...
Haha thank you. With 30 years of footage we feel we have to post a little more 😁✈️
@@justplanes ,
Wow. Love the DC-10 and MD-11 👍
I still still see Continental planes and their white and blue livery when I come across United jets today.
I’m from Belgium so I’m really happy that you included a Belgian airplane🙌
Very sad though that Sabena doesn’t fly anymore😕
Waarom heet je KLMgames?
T B geen idee eigenlijk, heb klmflyer als username op spellen (kwam ineens in me op)
I miss these days
A classic!
Since THAT year, the aviation has changed forever !
William Aguiar Aviation didn't change forever since 2001. Airport security was stepped up and planespotting became suddenly difficult in the United States. That's about it if you ask me. Today more and more people fly and continue to fly.
AMS Flyer It also caused Boeing to cancel their sonic cruiser which would have changed aviation forever
The engines sound is beautiful
I love the MD-11
Amazing footage! Loved it!
Love the horizontal stab dihedral. Dig the old EWR tower.
Awesome. Thanks for this. :)
Excellent video 👍 Thanks
Thanks very much!
Scary to think this hreat video was filmed just prior to 9/11.
Cool planes!!! Md-11 and DC-10 are super cool
TANAY.NICE GLAD TO SEE SOME MEMORABLE DC10 .MD 11 BOTH THIS PLANES DEZINE ARE SAME BUT LITTLE SIZE DEFFRENCE BACK WHEN AIRPORT LIKE FULL NOISE WITH PLANES 2001 MY CHILDHOOD.
Best looking commercial aircraft of all time IMHO!
MD-11 the most beautiful plane ever!
Very nice video.
FedEx N303FE is still in service.
Nice catch on Continental go around.
Great shots of the DC-10, MD-11 and twin towers👍
3:45 man that's a PERFECT LANDING
DC10s only do butter landings here!
Those big trijets are like two planes one above the other..
Era padre ver los dc 10 en vivo volar desde los aeropuertos 1970-2010.
DC10 and MD11 were faster at landing than other planes.
Wow. So many three-holers.
The old Newark airport control tower!
Lived near ewr back in 2007, Used to see these fly in and out
GOD DAMNED GORGEOUS
Wow so nice video
Thank you!
I miss continental
Continental Airlines at its best
2:08 I had a heart attack cause I thought that plane was a delta plane but I actually had to pause it and play it frame by frame before I realized it was an Air Canada DC-9 😂
3:00 do I see the gorgeous tween towers in NYC? ??
Wow. . 😭😔
Yes you do
Ich habe diese flugzeuge geliebt 👍😉
Three holes, as God intended
Amen. :)
I see what you did there
Who remembers Emery Worldwide 5:15
Sean Mitchell me
Im sorry, this is a very silly question, but, what are the differences between DC 10/MD 11?
2:53 - What is going on here.. aircraft going around, because another plane is landing on the intersecting runway.. was that how it was back then? Just open up every single runway!?!?! Woah!!
In my 67 yrs on this earth, this is the first Continental DC-10 I have ever seen.
They were a major DC-10 operator. Where have you been? lol
@@lelekoJumboJet 😁😁😁
Gotta Love the Death Cruiser 10 and the L-1011. MD-11 is just more airworthy than the DC-10 😂💯👍🏼
Right now it's doing better then the 737 max
Nice
Thank you
Avation wont never been the same again,
0:06 I have a model 727 of that one
Wow this had to be early on in 2001 with the towers standing in the background.
I wish WN would fly these. They would look great in Southwest Airlines colors
40 years ago, 25/5/79 American Flight 191 took off from Chicago O'Hare bound for LAX. It never made it. On takeoff one of the engines of the DC-10 detached and sent the aircraft into a 90 degree bank. Poor maintenance was to blame for the 273 fatalities.
@1LuckyGuy 40Ladies reminds me of United Flight 232 on July 19 1989. Here again a DC-10 crash-landed at Sioux City, Iowa, after suffering a catastrophic failure of its #2engine, which led to the loss of the hydraulic system.
@@vieuxbal1253 Thank heavens they don't put large engines on the tail of commercial jets these days! An uncontained fan blade ejection would rip the horizontal and vertical stabilizer to shreds resulting in inevitable loss of control. Remember Turkish 981? Cargo door blew open and put the DC-10 in a nosedive. 346 fatalities. RIP
@@luckyme4136 very true.
Of all all the plane crashes I've studied, Flight 191 (1979) is by far the worst one of the lot. The worst part was that the takeoff was shown to the passenger cabin on screens. They watched their own deaths.
@@AlonsoRules I wonder if the passengers onboard the disaster prone MAX witnessed their own death on the IFE monitor? The romance of air travel. 🤪
Wow MH in EWR 0:50 ‼️
I miss the old New York
2:56 is that a near runway incursion?
Flying together
Swissair🇨🇭 😪
7:32 Nice Fedex DC-10-30 takeoff
Just a little while after this was shot, the world suddenly became not fun anymore.
Bring back the tri-jet. With engine efficiency now, imagine what a beast of an aircraft you could get in airborne with, for example, 3x GE9X. Make it about 1.7 times the length of an A380, but shorten the rear, top floor a couple meters to make room for a giant, fuselage shaped, S-duct to get enough air to the rear engine. The top of the duct would be flush with the fuselage width and go half way around the top, making it sleek and with the most efficient utilization of shape and weight. Bring the wings back to keep the AOA proper and make them folding like the 777X. The result could be the most efficient, longest range commercial aircraft... ever.
Why don't you show us a rendering of your aircraft 😊
@@vieuxbal1253 Thanks, and I wish I could draw, but imagine a totally flush, fuselage shape until the last 2 or 3 meters of the back, top half, drop off with about a 2' clearance, exactly half way around the fuselage. My theory is, that shape would accomplish saving weight, allowing enough air for a GE9X to reach the rear engine, and keep the sleek look of the plane whole, but having the top of the duct the exact same shape as the fuselage. Then calculate the total thrust of 3 of those bad-boys and figure the wing loading and MTOW capability, and build a HUGE aircraft accordingly, with one shortened version for an "LR" type. 500+ people, SYD to JFK with added space for commercial cargo, conservatively.
@@BayAreaLen the problem is that Airlines' bean counters don't want more than 2 engine in order to cut costs.
BayAreaLen Classic Airbus has announced the end of the A380 programme. I think it's clear the world doesn't want an even bigger aircraft.
@@AMSFlyer absolutely
before the 911?
Yeah..you can see the twin towers at 3:02
Pretty somber knowing it’s 2001 and those towers are still standing. Great classic plane footage…
It takes them quite some time (and runway lenght) to get airborne. Though I like the old three-engine layout, DC10s are odd.
At least the passenger ones they're Intercontinental flights for sure, so they are bound to have high take off weights. In fact the DC-10 had more pounds of thrust per pound of weight than the 747.
Look at the 747-100 and 200.
@@mirrormirroronthewall1905 There is nothing to look at if you don't know what the take off weight is at any given time. Simple math will give you the answer. Add the maximum thrust of the engines, and divide typical MTOW by that figure. For a typical DC-10-30, it would be 570000 lbs TOW divided by 150000 lbs of thrust; for a 747-200, with the same GE engines, it would be 810000 lbs TOW divided by 200000 lbs of thrust. That will give you the ratio of power vs. weight. Then get familiar with the TO Flex feature of the DC-10; you enter weight, temperature, wind and runway length in the computer, and it will give you the thrust that you need for a successful take off. Taking off at 97% N1 instead of 100 or 105% will save tons of money in engine wear and tear and maintenance expenses.
I meant their performance at near MTOW like using most of 11000 ft runways but thanks for the lecture anyway, and your absolutely right about considering their TOW and thrust.
When Continental retired DC10s?
7 days after 9/11
Maybe I'm the future??
Guess who flys md-11s
My dad!
What is different between DC 10 and Dc 11 ? I want to know..
Compare the Sabena MD-11 with any of the Continental DC-10s. The MD-11 has a longer fuselage, the tail end has the shape of a slot screwdriver (like the B777), the stabilizers are smaller and most visible, it has winglets that the DC-10 does not have.
@@sobelou thank you..i understand
Did United just decide to buy Continental but keep Continental's livery?
When the jets said Continental! Not United.
Indeed
Concorde killers lol
Concord was already a failed project by the time it crashed in 2000 🤦
The DC-10 is known as a problem aircraft and when you remember that an DC-10 was fault for the Concorde crash in Paris
I watched the tv series Mayday and I saw an episode about the Concorde crash where a Continental Airlines DC-10's debris was a contributing factor to the engine explosion
@@diegofuentes6639 yes. I exactly mean this continental DC-10
@@tymgames8307 Its sad that a DC-10 unintentionally cast a stain on the Concorde, because before this accident, the Concorde had a stellar safety history with absolutely no serious accidents
@@diegofuentes6639 yes, indeed
That whole thing was negligence from the start. Continental maintenance used an improper part to repair an engine nacelle on the DC-10. Air France maintenance forgot to replace an axle spacer on the starboard landing gear leaving the wheels wobbling. Witnesses saw flames from that landing gear long before it hit the metal strip. And the plane was veering left and unable to gain speed... almost hit a 747 waiting to take off! I find it difficult to find fault with the DC-10 or Concorde for that terrible tragedy. The combination of a couple of apparently small maintenance errors proved deadly.
لف سش
DC-10 the most dangerous plane in the history
The DC-10 story reminds me of that of the 737 MAX. Both had MAJOR teething problems to say the least. I just can't get over the fact the DC-10 outsold the L1011 TriStar a far superior aircraft. 🤔
@@vieuxbal1253 Probably because the TriStar was expensive, *very expensive.*
@@dave_riots The DC-10 suffered three major accidents when it began to fly. American Airlines 96 with no fatalities, Turklish Airlines 981 with 346 fatalities and American Airlines 191 with 273 fatalities , making it the worst air disaster in US history
Once they fixed the cargo door issue and got airlines to stop cutting corners on maintenance, the DC-10 went on to be one of the safest planes ever built. The DC 10-40 has a perfect safety record!
@@Dana_Danarosana That is true, ever since there have been no more accidents that have cast a stain on the DC-10's reputation, except the crash of United Airlines 232
SABENA = "(S)uch (A) (B)ad (E)xperience (N)ever (A)gain..." lol....
Ugly ass 3 engine planes, nice video though
What a terrible safety record!
What a terrible aircraft!
Should have been scrapped decades ago.
Passenger versions are scrapped already...
Old plane lover : you are enemy of the people